On 07/06/2015 12:43, Simon Poole wrote:
- while superficially the licence of wikidata is claimed to be CC0
That does raise an interesting question - while the source of wikidata
is claimed to be CC0 the source of wikipedia isn't:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Copyrights
A
On 30/05/2015 13:51, Jóhannes Birgir Jensson wrote:
I find it odd that inaction, incapability or incompetence of local
sign installers is a worry for a database of geographical facts, which
OSM is.
Why should it be incompetence? Near where I live there's a ring road
around a local town.
On 30/05/2015 07:59, Roland Olbricht wrote:
I happened to drive through Belgium a few days ago, heading home. A
good approximation of home in this case is name=Köln. Actually, I
found a street sign (150 km away from Köln) that reads Keulen.
Should I have followed it or not?
A name:xx
On 29/05/2015 09:16, David Woolley wrote:
There are ways of reversing changes exactly, but they are difficult to
use if there have been ad hoc attempts to repair in the mean time, as
you have to reverse those repairs first and you need to distinguish
them from legitimate changes that
On 29/05/2015 07:07, Andrew Hain wrote:
Thank you Dave. As a British mapper I am ashamed that some people want
to make the map of my country less useful, and not only to Russian
speakers a long way away.
Hang on, where is _anybody_ saying that? The whole point of the thread
is about whether
On 29/05/2015 12:51, Maarten Deen wrote:
It depends on what you want. When someone asks me to navigate to
Natanzon, Haifa how can I enter it when the only name in the map is
נתנזון, חיפה?
I don't see why the transliterated name is not important.
No-one is saying that the transliterated
On 29/05/2015 12:14, moltonel 3x Combo wrote:
On 29/05/2015, SomeoneElse li...@atownsend.org.uk wrote:
how do we distinguish in the Abergavenny case between the two
established names and the up to 7,000 (but realistically in the short
term a few hundred) translations? That's unfortunately
On 29/05/2015 10:42, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
You don't even need on the ground evidence. You just need someone
... or something ...
with knowledge of Cyrillic and Roman alphabets to be able to transliterate
Abergavenny into the Cyrillic, presumably.
Absolutely.
But leaving aside whether
On 29/05/2015 14:14, moltonel 3x Combo wrote:
I'm not a fan of (un)signed=* (the most common in tagginfo) because
their meaning is not obvious enough. name:signed=en;cy would be a
first and open the multiple-value can of worms. But name:signed=yes/no
has 161 uses in taginfo, and
On 28/05/2015 22:27, moltonel 3x Combo wrote:
You can argue against machine-made non-reviewed translitterations,
because they don't add anything that a data consumer couldn't and
because they likely contain mistakes. But that's apparenlty not the
case of the name:ru changeset that got reverted.
On 28/05/2015 20:12, Colin Smale wrote:
Querying the history on the website just times out so I can't easily
see when it went pear-shaped and how it used to be
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/287245
http://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=287245
shows recent changes to
On 27/05/2015 22:56, Andy Mabbett wrote:
A demonstrator, using Wikidata labels, is:
http://googleknowledge.github.io/qlabel/demo/map/ (choose select
language). Coders might enjoy viewing the source code.
That's interesting, but seems just to do multiple http transactions to
get the names it
On 28/05/2015 11:20, Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
El Jueves 28. mayo 2015 10.59.21 Steve Doerr escribió:
There might be a case for adding pronunciations (of 'difficult' names at
least) to the OSM database. Someone must have proposed a tagging scheme
for this, surely?
Yup.
/globalmap/
To release the map, we need the whole map in Russian, and in English.
For closed beta, we chose to enable a small subset of a map, 80
provinces, for which I manually added the translations:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/30451655
This changeset got reverted by SomeoneElse
On 28/05/2015 16:38, Andrew Guertin wrote:
A quick internet search shows plenty of results for Абергавенни,
including Wikipedia, hotel booking sites, and Harry Potter websites,
and by looking at Google's book results, you can see that it's been in
use since at least the 1800s. And with just
On 27/05/2015 21:29, thomas van der veen wrote:
Hi,
I just did a quick update to a path in Newbury and goes through a
tunnel in a building... but my edit seems to have destroyed the
building and I am not sure how to get it back.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/51.40251/-1.32458
is the
On 19/05/2015 12:13, Dave F. wrote:
Hi
For the past few weeks I've been getting random blue fill at high zoom
levels. Is this caused by the coastline being broken again?
When it happens, right-click the browser and view image. You'll get a
URL something like:
On 15/05/2015 10:22, Jason Woollacott wrote:
Looks like there has been an issue with changeset 30821940 Which
seems to have added the A30 through the whole of Cornwall on an
incorrect route.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/30821940
Didn’t want to back this change out myself, as not
On 12/05/2015 17:28, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
Why not
ref:highway_authority
To keep the tags just a little bit organized?
https://xkcd.com/927/
(sorry)
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
On 12/05/2015 11:22, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
Maybe the tag unsigned_ref is an outcome?
0 uses in the UK:
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/keys/unsigned_ref
There are 86 ref:signed=no (mostly by me, so not a widely used tag)
but that's where something demonstrably is the real
On 12/05/2015 11:30, Andy Robinson wrote:
Where I see these on C/U roads I change the ref= tag to
highway_authority_ref=
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/keys/highway_authority_ref
276 of those - that's one that I wasn't aware of!
Cheers,
Andy
On 12/05/2015 09:52, Bob Kerr wrote:
On residential roads where there has been a ref= added is being
rendered on Mapnik. Is this something new since I have not been
checking recently. This is all over the highlands
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/57.5695/-4.4282
I don't think
On 07/05/2015 12:03, Simon Poole wrote:
I'm really not sure what this discussion is doing on tagging and have
redirected follow ups to talk (it has in the matter of a few mails
already gone substantially off-topic though).
The page in question is actually a fork of
On 04/05/2015 08:35, Graham Jones wrote:
I don't know where the discussion got to, but thought I should point
out that at least one road in North Yorkshire is a C road that is
signposted as such.
The road here does have signs with the C designation.
On 04/05/2015 10:50, Philip Barnes wrote:
In this case if you have surveyed it and it is signed then it would be
helpful if it was tagged as signed=yes, or something similar.
SomeoneElse I think he has used similar tagging for unsigned A roads.
FWIW I've used name:signed=no and ref:signed
On 04/05/2015 11:10, Steve Doerr wrote:
Personally, I quite like the fact that our map has C numbers on where
other maps don't. What I don't like, though, is seeing U numbers for
unclassified roads, which are cluttering up the map of my home area
On 02/05/2015 02:18, Andrew MacKinnon wrote:
The same is true with an amenity=restaurant called Subway, since
it should be amenity=fast_food and any Subway that is not the well
known chain would almost certainly be sued by the well known chain and
forced to changed its name.
I wouldn't
On 01/05/2015 22:18, Robert Banick wrote:
Hi All,
I was reading the below linked article on the BBC today and came
across the map. It looks like they’re using OSM-derived internally
displaced person (IDP) camp data without attribution.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/20039682
Looks like that
On 17/04/2015 02:05, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
On 04/17/2015 02:10 AM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
I propose to use context to determine the meaning, and retag according
to current conventions. For example recycling:excrement at a marina
dock will be assume as a marine sewage pumpout station. The
On 16/04/2015 18:59, Daniel Koć wrote:
Recently I got tired of a caching problem with rendered tiles, which
causes freshly changed tiles to dis- and reappear with no particular
pattern. I wrote about it here:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/955
For me it's very
On 22/03/2015 15:54, Andy Mabbett wrote:
On 21 March 2015 at 21:18, Manfred A. Reiter ma.rei...@gmail.com wrote:
The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 243, is now available online in
English, giving as always a summary of all things happening in the
openstreetmap world:
per la
comunità italiana. Se non è sarei grato se qualcuno potrebbe postare in
un forum più largamente usato.
Best Regards /i migliori saluti,
Andy Townsend (SomeoneElse), on behalf of the OSM Data Working Group
(1) http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/29645361
Regards,
Andy Townsend (SomeoneElse), on behalf of the OSM Data Working Group
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
On 15/03/2015 23:20, Mikel Maron wrote:
On Saturday, March 14, 2015 9:59 PM, Alex Barth a...@mapbox.com wrote:
Yeah, that's just setting up a HOT tasking manager right? Except the
HOT tasking manager will probably choke on one half hour tasks for all
of US :)
Set up multiple projects on the
On 14/03/2015 21:48, Andreas Goss wrote:
Just because people some people make bad decisions when mapping, doesn't
mean that the whole project has to lower its standards.
And some people in this case are what? 99%? I seriously there are many
people who would spend a second though when changing
How about just less chat*, more mapping?
Cheers,
Andy
* endless tagging list discussions, wikivotes etc.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On 14/02/2015 21:30, SomeoneElse wrote:
Hi folks,
Every now and then, not far from null island, some features pop up
in the middle of the Atlantic. One of them's called Cat Forest. You
can see references to it here:
The source of Cat Forest has been found:
https://github.com/hotosm
On 09/03/2015 16:09, Harald Kliems wrote:
Does this sound reasonable? Anything else I should be thinking of?
I'll apologise upfront in case any of this sounds like the bleeding
obvious - I'm sure you'll have thought through lots of this and more
already...
One thing that immediately comes
On 08/03/2015 15:12, Paul Johnson wrote:
If someone pulls the cord or there's someone waiting at it, yes. But
it's not like a bus station where the bus will always stop regardless
of demand.
In the UK customary stops like this tend to get tagged as
physically_present=no:
On 05/03/2015 20:39, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
I'm happy to import *JUST the six notes* if that's preferred, without
any node
Could you have a go at locating these notes a bit better than the
previous reverted import (e.g. put the note for the one that says that
is in the Swan Hotel in Stafford
On 05/03/2015 21:47, stevea wrote:
I add that another, vital, and even preferred approach towards
mediocre or crude data is to contact the editor and offer help
(instruction) in improving them. This really grows the project, too,
when and as it takes. Fixing something myself (and/or with
On 04/03/2015 18:18, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
Ok, making a possibly final call for input on the proposed cluster
mechanical edit:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/Bryce_C_Nesbitt
Just to be clear - you're only removing these tags where they were added
by the original
On 04/03/2015 19:20, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
Andy,
It appears from an audit that there's been a modest amount of
editing,and mechanical copying of the trees affected by
the original import. In the UK that import was reverted, but
worldwide it is messier. The denotation=cluster tag itself is
On 25/02/2015 08:51, Tobias Knerr wrote:
On 25.02.2015 02:58, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
It is apparent that a number of imports have left tens of thousands of
fixme notes that have a low chance of ever getting addressed. Pick your
favorite from the lists above: set␣better␣denotation is my mine.
On 25/02/2015 05:00, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
Any fixme in wide use I'm not interested in deleting.
I'd strongly oppose the mechanical deletion of low volume fixme
values. Mappers local to me often use individually worded fixmes
describing something that needs investigation. By definition
On 18/02/2015 11:38, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
I've tried some foot routing out and it appears that someone has done a mass
addition of access=private to large numbers of ROWs in Hampshire.
See
Hi folks,
Every now and then, not far from null island, some features pop up in
the middle of the Atlantic. One of them's called Cat Forest. You can
see references to it here:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/308544
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/219747755/history
On 12/02/2015 11:53, Michael Kugelmann wrote:
On 12.02.2015 at 12:30 Richard Z. wrote:
came across a pretty major license violation and need technical
help and another pair of eyes to figure out what is going on.
http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Data_working_group or
On 12/02/2015 13:32, Dave F. wrote:
Thanks to both for the clarification. The way it was written it
implied bona fide editors were deliberately adding false POIs to catch
vandals.
I translated that bit; I added quotes to the German original and changed
the payoff to try and make it obvious
On 10/02/2015 23:38, colliar wrote:
... I am fed up with ...
... at this point it's probably worth mentioning that we've been here
before:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2013-August/thread.html#67854
Unfortunately, experience suggests that there's relatively little that a
On 06/02/2015 12:08, Brian Prangle wrote:
... So we thought that adding Notes about road names that need fixing
on the standard OSM map, asking for confirmation of the correct name,
might elicit some response via a comment indicating the correct name.
I see that you and RobJN have added
On 26/01/2015 19:19, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
2) Nobody seems to mind if a school POI is off by 30 meters. But the
people do seem to care for bicycle repair stations.
Citation needed, I think. That may be true in the US (were schools
imported there?) but I'd be very surprised if in the UK
On 26/01/2015 19:55, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net
mailto:o...@raggedred.net wrote:
Again, that doesn't justify adding data you know are poor quality.
Please don't do that.
The data in question is collected via GPS: it's of
On 25/01/2015 05:20, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
Where do OSM cycling enthusiasts hang out : is there a mailing list or
group focused on cycling features?
#osm-gb on IRC. :)
(I'm only half joking - the channel topic is usually Pubs and cycle
routes a speciality)
Cheers,
Andy
On 25/01/2015 19:06, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
I figure that OSM has a small role to play here: if everyone's
smartphone bike app can FIND these stations, that will increase
awareness and thus encourage universities and cities to install them.
There does seem to have been a few issues with some
Hijacking the thread somewhat, but something that I was wondering about
recently...
There are many roads that are signed, and we can add them to OSM. Great!
There are some roads that are signed, and the sign differs from what the
local authority thinks that a road is called (usually just
On 24/01/2015 11:41, Leon Kernan wrote:
It may have been a few years since I've been to northern NSW, however
this doesn't look right to me.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=14/-28.8528/153.4695
Anyone familiar with the area able to confirm there is/isn't a brand
new Bruxner Motorway
On 22/01/2015 21:59, Andy Mabbett wrote:
I need some help, please.
I want to compile a list of all the pubs (including taverns bars, etc)
in the UK, with the word Louise as part of the name.
Do you mean in the UK, or in OSM in the UK?
How might I do this, given that I am not a coder?
My
On 20/01/2015 00:51, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
I have the impression that Saturday meetings seem to have a higher
turnout than evening meetings, as they also allow people from a bit
further afield to join. Maybe we could also plan again one or two
Saturday meetings in the Summer?
I believe
On 10/01/2015 17:09, Donald Noble wrote:
I know that tagging for the renderer is not particularly helpful,
however, might it be appropriate in this instance to map the
significant slopes around the edges of the crater with
man_made=embankment ? There are slopes there in reality, and they are
On 09/01/2015 14:09, Hans De Kryger wrote:
I think the reason most long time mappers don't communicate the
mistake the was made to new mapper
s
is
the fact that where
afraid of getting into a long drawn out conversation with them or it
turning into a disagreement and
end
ing
On 09/01/2015 12:23, Dave F. wrote:
OK, but however you perceive it, it still activates the 'view notes'.
Although it adds clarity to do so, it's not essential to the 'add a
note' function.
Speaking as a frequent user of the add notes function, I'd say that it
is extremely useful to
On 06/01/2015 01:25, Michał Brzozowski wrote:
* Software for monitoring OSM changes is still very rudimentary. I
wanna be the f**king NSA. It's incredibly hard to check newbies' work
quickly (eg. you have to load every changeset separately into OSMHV).
I'm not sure that it is incredibly hard -
On 04/01/2015 13:01, Lester Caine wrote:
Perhaps now is the time to be looking again at real time rendering
with a selectable style sheet, or perhaps simply a base layer on top
of which different languages and styles can be selected.
That sort of thing has been suggested before(1) but having
On 29/12/2014 16:53, Volker Schmidt wrote:
I tried to find, unsuccessfully, information about track recording
with GARMIN nuvi models.
I had occasion to use a nuvi 50 (with OSM maps) for car navigation. It
worked fine apart from the track recording that seems to be
permanently in lock on road
On 29/12/2014 17:06, SK53 wrote:
So I'd like to suggest everyone meets at the rendezvous, and that at
least the first short walk is done as a group.
Has anyone cleared parking at the pub? Some places can get sniffy about
it (even if spending lots of money there later). There's also
On 21/12/2014 12:02, Andrew Hain wrote:
Betfred took over Totesport a few years ago but there are still tags
name=Totesport, name=totesport or operator=Totesport in Ashford,
Birmingham(2), London (2), Manchester (2), Northampton, Oxford, Rotherham
and Wakefield.
I'd be tempted to add OSM
On 18/12/2014 18:59, Rovastar wrote:
Well please share the thoughts about what suggestions you have.
The big problem is not really whether a particular shop has an
apostrophe in the name or not, but the fact that we don't have anything
like all of said shops mapped. I suggested that any
On 18/12/2014 10:48, Dan S wrote:
2014-12-18 10:39 GMT+00:00 SomeoneElse li...@atownsend.org.uk:
On 18/12/2014 02:10, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
If you oppose this proposal, or if you want to register particular
areas or objects for an opt-out, please edit the wiki page under the
section
On 18/12/2014 10:24, Dan S wrote:
Hi Matthijs,
The DWG email used the word consensus inappropriately, since
consensus means everyone agreeing, and we didn't. However, consensus
is essentially impossible in big wiki communities like ours, so let's
assume there's a relative meaning of the term ;)
On 08/12/2014 11:25, Steve Bennett wrote:
It was quite an eye opener for me earlier this year to cycle in the UK
to discover that they really do have LCN, RCN, and NCN. And they're
slightly different from what I expected: NCN is basically a network
that links towns together, LCN and other
On 01/12/2014 11:58, John Aldridge wrote:
On 01/12/2014 11:39, Stuart Reynolds wrote:
Looking for some advice in Bletchley, specifically, but to answer a
more general point about footpaths.
:
So what is the guidance here? Ought the road have a distinct footpath
both sides? Or not footpath,
On 29/11/2014 12:16, tony wroblewski wrote:
Hi
I've been unable to access the OS OpenData layer in both JOSM and ID.
Has the address or URL changed, or is the server just down at the
moment?
Server room maintenance perhaps?
There's some work mentioned here:
On 29/11/2014 12:44, tony wroblewski wrote:
Thanks Andy
Yep, I guess it's hosted on faffy, and it's currently down.
It's actually a little more complicated than that I think. It _was_
hosted there, but that broke (hardware failure of some sort) during the
last maintenance period). The
On 13/10/2014 18:32, Aaron Lidman wrote:
Richrico should have responded. The Mapbox data team has a policy to
respond to all questions from the community. I'm sorry he didn't, he
has now, and we've reminded all members of our data team of this
policy. This should no longer be an issue in the
On 27/11/2014 13:50, Nick Bearman wrote:
and what areas in Liverpool would benefit most from the students
contribution. Currently, giving the time available to the students, I
would be thinking of a desk-based digitisation exercise, but this can
be flexible.
Based on a fleeting visit to
On 26/11/2014 23:01, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
But is there any tool capable of finding interesting trips starting in
some selected place,
that returns to the point of origin after going through some
interesting* places using good*
ways?
http://walks.io/ has a go at doing a bit like that.
On 20/11/2014 07:52, Lester Caine wrote:
... although the list of other local mappers on your profile is one
place where I would like to see that particular link included!
... and don't forget that iD already includes an edits by section at
the bottom of the screen which links to people who
For info, I added a comment to the first of these changesets and the
editor replied there:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/26783815
Cheers,
Andy
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
There seem to be quite a few GB motorways in OSM with names, and some of
those names don't look very plausible. For example, there's:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37906957
This is the M4 past Heathrow and apparently it is named the Chiswick to
Langley Special Road. That name seems to
On 16/11/2014 10:13, Colin Smale wrote:
I have also been looking for such a facility - in my case for admin
boundaries.
For admin boundaries in the UK and Ireland I use EdLoach's :
http://www.loach.me.uk/osm/boundaries/
Cheers,
Andy
___
talk
On 12/11/2014 03:13, Oleksiy Muzalyev wrote:
They are technically extraterritorial through a treaty agreement
with the U.S. government (1).
Good luck getting there without a US visa though!
Cheers,
Andy
___
talk mailing list
and interpretation (and a local survey!) to see how
everything on the ground relates to everything else.
Based on their error rate so far I'd definitely still suggest that local
mappers check their edits.
Cheers,
Andy
On 08/11/2014 22:51, SomeoneElse wrote:
An anonymous note adder (http
On 12/11/2014 10:59, Stuart Reynolds wrote:
Please pass the details back to me, and I will discuss it with them and also
with the community if things need reverting.
Thanks Stuart. All of my detailed comments so far have been on
changesets. I went through
For completeness, I've also added a changeset discussion comment to:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/26688781
Cheers,
Andy
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
I happened to notice
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/24646348
while looking at something else. It looks a bit odd - doesn't seem to
match the underlying imagery.
The previous changeset by this user
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/24646289
is a similar bunch of deletions,
On 12/11/2014 19:43, Richard Welty wrote:
On 11/12/14 2:36 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
i'm taking a look at them now.
i see tags deleted, and then restored by pnorman_mechanical.
so there was a problem, but it seems that it's long since fixed
(thanks paul)
richard
Some of them were reverted but
An anonymous note adder (http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/267719) and
someone on IRC noticed some problematical railway edits near
Sutton-in-Ashfield:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/311380489#map=15/53.1247/-1.2346layers=N
It looks like an attempt to dual the Robin Hood line went a bit
I'd always assumed that the correct way to map turn lanes is via:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:turn:lanes .
However, some mappers in the UK* have started mapping each individual
lane as a separate parallel road. Here's an example:
On 05/11/2014 17:24, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
Could you please have a look at
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/Math1985/UK_Shop_Names
if there are any other changes that need removing or changing?
Wilkinson we know are in a process of rebranding to Wilko; so I
might be
On 02/11/2014 10:36, Simon Poole wrote:
I would like to personally thank ukasiu, emacsen, woodpeck and TomH for
developing and deploying this. A much wanted and needed feature.
Thanks from me too. I think that it'll be really, really useful.
Currently meta discussions happen elsewhere (on
for
years take for granted.
Cheers,
Andy
** http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/SomeoneElse/notes
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
On 01/11/2014 20:08, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
I in fact even proposed incorporating a system that makes this
explicit in the notes API:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2014-August/070423.html
Unfortunately, my suggestion in that thread didn't gain traction.
It's great to have
On 29/10/2014 09:05, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote:
It therefore surprised me when I read the White Paper ...
What I read was MapBox pays some bloke called Kevin to write a paper
supporting their commercial point of view re the licensing of
OpenStreetMap data.
Does it really deserve
On 24/10/2014 14:06, Dave F. wrote:
On 23/10/2014 13:04, SomeoneElse wrote:
They maybe more visible, but that doesn't mean they get updated or
offer more relevant data. If Fixmes had a front end overlay they'd,
obviously, be just as noticeable.
You could argue that they do:
http
On 24/10/2014 14:06, Dave F. wrote:
Specific Q lots of these notes in my area are 'Incorrect speed limit.
Reported speed limit is 40 mph' from 'anonymous'. Where is it
'reported' from. Is it being compared with another database?
That was mentioned on talk:
On 22/10/2014 23:04, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
Dear all,
For all objects tagged with shop=betting and name Betfred, Coral,
Ladbrokes, Paddy Power or William Hill, I am planning to change the
tag shop=betting into shop=bookmaker.
I'm usually the first to stand up for a diversity of tags in OSM
On 23/10/2014 12:57, Dave F. wrote:
I'm not convinced Notes are cleared up any more than Fixmes
They certainly are more visible to me - they're available for a simple
overlay on the main map and get announced in IRC channels.
In order to clear them up I wrote something* to create a Garmin
On 16/10/2014 14:28, Maarten Deen wrote:
On 2014-10-16 15:15, Dave F. wrote:
I had a footpath between them.
So the problem is also that the check is wrong. Apperantly it looks at
major roads that are apart, but doesn't see that they are connected by
another road.
IMHO these cases should
On 13/10/2014 11:48, Dave F. wrote:
Hi
Once again I've had user Richrico use this website:
http://osmlab.github.io/to-fix/?error=unconnected_major5 to
inaccurately amend data in OSM.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/65398595#map=19/51.32464/-2.22817
Way: 65398595 This way is /not/ joined.
1 - 100 di 579 matches
Mail list logo
