Anthony wrote:
You seem to have missed the rest of my post. I was arguing that a road
with no pavement but with a shoulder is *not* unsafe. OTOH, if the road
has no shoulder, and traffic traveling at 55 mph, and only 1 car a day,
I'm not walking down it.
I think the POINT here is that
Dear list,
Anybody knows why the first query works and the second doesn't?
wget
http://www.informationfreeway.org/api/0.6/node[bbox=-82.90108,21.82252,-82.88907,21.82971]
--output-document=a.txt
wget
http://www.informationfreeway.org/api/0.6/way[bbox=-82.90108,21.82252,-82.88907,21.82971]
On 2 June 2010 17:32, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
'Safe' for pedestrians to use is simply undefinable as we have already decided
when trying to identify URBAN areas where one would not walk on one's own!
MAPS
I disagree that this is an undefinable problem, as I pointed out
before
On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 00:39:14 -0700 (PDT), Juan Lucas Domínguez Rubio
juan_lucas...@yahoo.com wrote:
Dear list,
Anybody knows why the first query works and the second doesn't?
wget
http://www.informationfreeway.org/api/0.6/node[bbox=-82.90108,21.82252,-82.88907,21.82971]
--- On Wed, 6/2/10, Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl wrote:
From: Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] OSM XAPI doubt
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Date: Wednesday, June 2, 2010, 9:56 AM
On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 00:39:14 -0700
(PDT), Juan Lucas Domínguez Rubio
juan_lucas...@yahoo.com
John Smith wrote:
If you wanted something more definite, police injury records could
provide alternative verifiability, if as John pointed out 5 people
were hurt or killed trying to cross a road than it's obviously not
safe.
Only if you do the same for other vehicles - highway with lots of
crashes
2010/6/2 John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com:
With many high-speed highways (such as Interstate Highways in the USA,
Autobahn in Germany, etc.) you may have wide shoulders, but pedestrian use on
the shoulders is inadvisable and/or illegal, because crossing to the other
side means having to
On 2 June 2010 18:49, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
As others have said, foot=no when pedestrians are legally allowed is a
I was one of them if you check my replies.
bad idea. As long as you walk against traffic, drivers will usually
see you, and you can easily see and get out of
At 2010-05-31 10:57, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Anthony wrote:
By these definitions, something that is able to be confirmed as true or
false in an official online source is actually *more* verifiable than
something written on a street sign in a place where Google Street View
has not yet visited.
At 2010-05-31 13:27, Anthony wrote:
2010/5/31 Ian Dees
ian.d...@gmail.com
I don't think anyone has suggested that we leave out things I'd
they
aren't signposted.
Nathan, who started this thread, has done exactly that, and he's gone
around removing route relations where the routes were not
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
John Smith wrote:
If you wanted something more definite, police injury records could
provide alternative verifiability, if as John pointed out 5 people
were hurt or killed trying to cross a road than it's obviously not
John Smith wrote:
Smokescreen, a 175KB, 8,000-line JavaScript-based Flash player
written by Chris Smoak at RevShock, a mobile ad startup, and to
be open-sourced 'in the near future.'
Wow. Just wow.
cheers
Richard
--
View this message in context:
I agree that foot_unsafe=yes would probably be a good compromise, as it would
say, yes, you can go this way, but it is risky.. This would be particularly
suitable for routes that are riskier under some conditions than others, such as
roads with narrow shoulders, risky to walk on after dark.
On 2 June 2010 22:06, John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com wrote:
I agree that foot_unsafe=yes would probably be a good compromise, as it would
say, yes, you can go this way, but it is risky.. This would be particularly
suitable for routes that are riskier under some conditions than others,
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 7:27 AM, Nic Roets nro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
As others have said, foot=no when pedestrians are legally allowed is a
bad idea. As long as you walk against traffic, drivers will usually
see you, and
Good suggestion.
--Original Message--
From: John Smith
To: John Eldredge
Cc: OpenStreetMap talk mailing list
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Software goes on, brain goes off...
Sent: Jun 2, 2010 7:19 AM
On 2 June 2010 22:06, John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com wrote:
I agree that
On 02.06.2010 14:19, John Smith wrote:
You could extend it a little and explain more specifically:
unsafe:foot=narrow/fast_traffic/muggers/etc
routing:hints:foot:avoid=yes
routing:hints:foot:comment=fast traffic
routing:hints:motorcar:avoid=yes
routing:hints:motorcar:comment=street layout
Hello,
Osmose [1], a french quality insurance tool has now some analysers
analysing data out of France.
* One of the analyser [2] is raising errors on relations
boundary=adminitrative wich :
- are not closed
- have some end nodes more than two times (ie that some way is
included
On 2 June 2010 23:03, Henry Loenwind he...@loenwind.info wrote:
routing:hints:bike:comment=foot traffic avoidance costs time
Looks good, except I'd use note instead of comment, only because it is
more commonly used already.
___
talk mailing list
Sorry, this was intended for the *list*, not Anthony. Damn mail client...
She wasn't playing, she was walking to her destination. I can't tell
from the pictures whether it was her fault for following the route, her
fault for walking on the wrong side of the road, her fault for not
staying
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 9:49 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
Worst than that, it could lead to even more stupid terms and
conditions annoying you over and over and over again after every route
request.
They could always require people to log in. Or require people to log in if
On 3 June 2010 00:15, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
They could always require people to log in. Or require people to log in if
they want to put up with the annoying terms and conditions only once.
This woman is claiming she wasn't warned the route might be bad, so to
ensure that people don't
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 10:16 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
On 3 June 2010 00:15, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
They could always require people to log in. Or require people to log in
if
they want to put up with the annoying terms and conditions only once.
This woman is
On 3 June 2010 00:24, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
This woman is claiming she wasn't warned the route might be bad, so to
ensure that people don't forget they agreed to view the warning only
once, everyone will be forced to view it every time regardless.
Really? Do you have a link for that?
Message original
Sujet: [CrisisMappers] Karachi
Date : Wed, 2 Jun 2010 06:41:05 -0700 (PDT)
De :Chris chrisgnicho...@att.net
Répondre à :crisismapp...@googlegroups.com
Pour : CrisisMappers crisismapp...@googlegroups.com
by most forecasts is about to get slammed
Nathan Edgars II wrote:
I know this isn't the Cloudmade list, but a recent thread here got
some results. I used the feedback link but never got a response.
That's strange. I've always gotten a response from Cloudmade.
If you go to
Anthony wrote:
Room to get off the road. That's what I was referring to as a shoulder.
Here in the third world (Derbyshire, England) we call those hedges.
If I avoided walking along roads without a shoulder or sidewalk of any
sort I wouldn't get very far.
I think that we're hitting
Nic Roets wrote:
Nathan, the problem is providing good routing instructions to average
people. If we can't provide that we will loose people to Google Map
Maker, Waze, Tom Tom etc.
One advantage that OSM has over the commercial people is that routes get
mapped proportionately to how real
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 7:27 AM, Nic Roets nro...@gmail.com wrote:
When I map, I just want to create a useful map. And when I write
software it should be backward compatible with old data and forward
compatible with new data and still give reasonable results. I don't
want to waste time on
On Wed, 2 Jun 2010, colliar wrote:
Am 01.06.2010 16:01, schrieb lulu-...@gmx.de:
Hi there,
this is not my proposal, but as RfC was forgotten I ask for your comments
now.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Playground_Equipment
It has been well discussed on mailing
On 06/02/2010 03:03 PM, Henry Loenwind wrote:
routing:hints:motorcar:avoid=yes
routing:hints:motorcar:comment=street layout hard to follow for non-locals
routing:hints:motorcar:prefer=yes
routing:hints:motorcar:comment=faster traffic than the parallel primary
Nice.. +1
This would be nice
On 3 June 2010 05:22, si...@mungewell.org wrote:
What would be the purpose of (say) a 2D barcode displayed in the window?
I
mean, you're all ready there
The purpose is to give things a unique ID, the QR code could embed a
very unique ID and then that ID can be used to identify that
On 3 June 2010 10:04, si...@mungewell.org wrote:
The 'shortlink' does not describe an object with OSM, it describes a
location on the planet (akin to a lat/long).
Yup, exactly, and it doesn't describe a level in the case of a
multilevel building, both above and below ground.
On 3 June 2010 01:04, si...@mungewell.org wrote:
The point is people are consistently told OSM IDs shouldn't be
considered as unique as the object could be deleted/merged/whatever
and so the previous ID is no longer valid even if the object exists
with other IDs.
How can you
Gregory nomoregra...@googlemail.com wrote:
If I'm mapping I try and keep nodes intact and edit the tagging
to preserve the ID and history, but there are cases where this
can't happen.
Another example where ID and history are lost is when we change items from
single nodes to areas, as we get
On 3 June 2010 10:24, Gregory nomoregra...@googlemail.com wrote:
If you want a QR code, I understand these are usually(always?) just internet
URLs converted into a 2D barcode. For this you can
use http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/125847545
QR codes are 2 dimension matrix that store
On 3 June 2010 10:52, Simon Biber simonbi...@yahoo.com.au wrote:
Does anyone have a good solution for this?
That's what this thread is about, printing out stickers that have
their own unique ID, then tagging objects with that ID...
___
talk mailing
On 3 June 2010 10:04, si...@mungewell.org wrote:
The 'shortlink' does not describe an object with OSM, it describes a
location on the planet (akin to a lat/long).
Yup, exactly, and it doesn't describe a level in the case of a
multilevel building, both above and below ground.
or which door
On 3 June 2010 11:45, si...@mungewell.org wrote:
or which door bell to press, or the phone number, or
The phone number can already be added to objects, but at this point in
time there is no ID permanence, which would be useful. As an added
bonus it would be some free advertising for OSM.
On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 07:06 +1000, Liz wrote:
but anyway as voting just finished and it was not
anounced on the list and the tag is not wide used, I would say we should
set it back to proposed and wait for some response.
What reason other your personal ignorance do you have for
On 3 June 2010 12:57, Alan Mintz alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net wrote:
I have no problem with giving things a permid. But seriously, we can't go
around slapping stickers on the physical world. It's called vandalism.
I did say and ask business owners to put them up in their windows in
my first
Hi all,
If there are any OSM members in the sub-continent, I recommend this event.
Sahana makes heavy use of Open Street Maps, and GIS systems in general. It's
a great framework for developing applications in the humanitarian disaster
response domains. I'm sure many of the participants would be
== Mikel Maron ==
+254(0)724899738 @mikel s:mikelmaron
http://mapkibera.org/
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Haiti
- Forwarded Message
From: Tim McNamara paperl...@timmcnamara.co.nz
To: OSM Talk t...@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Thu, June 3, 2010 8:10:37 AM
Subject: [OSM-talk]
From: Simone Saviolo simone.savi...@gmail.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 8:32 AM
To: openstreetmap list - italiano talk-it@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-it] [per ridere] Tag name
Anche non fosse, come segnalare che l'immancabile via Roma (presente
nei più piccoli paesi) non è quella
2010/5/25 Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com:
Ciao a tutti,
martedì 1 giugno, alle ore 21.00 presso la Biblioteca di Santhià
(VC), abbiamo organizzato una serata di presentazione di OSM.
Per chi fosse interessato, ho pubblicato la presentazione su SlideShare:
Ciao, qualcuno mi aiuta a stampare la mappa della mia città?
Vorrei stamparla al massimo zoom, mi serve per poter segnare con facilità i
numeri civici, controllare eventuali errori o vie mancanti.
Ho provato facendo esporta e salvando il jpg ma è una cosa lunghissima perchè
zoomata al massimo
2010/6/2 Matteo matservi...@yahoo.it:
[cut]
Avete qualche consiglio da darmi?
hai provato a vedere con i walking papers?
http://walking-papers.org/
--
E' assurdo impiegare gli uomini di intelligenza eccellente per fare
calcoli che potrebbero essere affidati a chiunque se si usassero delle
Ciao, qualcuno mi aiuta a stampare la mappa della mia città?
questa pagina del wiki dovrebbe esseri d'aiuto
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_on_Paper
in breve puoi usare:
bigmap:
http://openstreetmap.gryph.de/bigmap.cgi
ti scarica un'immagine unica grande quanto vuoi, devi però avere
Luca 'remix_tj' Lorenzetto ha scritto:
hai provato a vedere con i walking papers?
http://walking-papers.org/
Si, ma non fa al casa mio, a me serve stampare la mappa con lo zoom al massimo
per poter avere tutti i nomi delle vie, poi ruotarla e rimpicciolirla finchè si
riescono a leggere.
Il 02/06/2010 10:59, Andrea Musuruane ha scritto:
Per chi fosse interessato, ho pubblicato la presentazione su SlideShare:
http://www.slideshare.net/musuruan/presentazione-openstreetmap
Bellina, complimenti!
Ho rilevato un paio di errorini a pag. 32:
Corso XXV Aprile → Corso 25 aprile
So I was looking through some cycle books, as you do, when I came across
this one (i've hosted the images 3rd party and avoided HTML, if
they don't work let me know. I had to snap them on the iPhone - so sorry for
the lack of a close focus!!) :
http://img249.imageshack.us/i/img0002tw.jpg/
It's a
On 2 June 2010 21:03, Phil Monger phil...@gmail.com wrote:
So I was looking through some cycle books, as you do, when I came across
this one (i've hosted the images 3rd party and avoided HTML, if
they don't work let me know. I had to snap them on the iPhone - so sorry for
the lack of a close
The LWG has been working with council on similar infringement cases. I suggest
this gets added.
As an aside, this is exactly what happened to some of my work a few years ago.
On Jun 2, 2010, at 2:03 PM, Phil Monger wrote:
So I was looking through some cycle books, as you do, when I came
That's actually a pretty bad way to resolve the issue, since the publisher is
liable for damages and you can absolve them of that and make things far worse
by individually contacting or publishing these infringements pre-emptively.
Unless you have a law degree.
Individuals enforcing
Phil,
Phil Monger wrote:
It's a new cycle book for London, with routes, etc. Pretty standard
fare. The problem? All the maps inside are blatant OSM copies (Mapnik, I
assume) with route overlays posted. Now this wouldn't be a problem,
obviously, except they are way WAY outside of CC-BY-SA.
Frederick,
I appreciate your view on this. but I must passionately disagree.
Collected works is set up to allow multiple sets of data / licenses to
operate together under one bound work. For example, a book of collected
maps about London could include OSM as CC-BY-SA but in itself, as a
Hi,
Phil Monger wrote:
This is entirely derivative. The maps and route descriptions operate
together as *one piece of work* - indeed descriptions of the ways, place
names, distances, directions (ect) used in *the text* are taken from
*the mapping*. The text couldn't / wouldn't be there
Well, Frederik, here is a challenge:
-Work out a 10 mile cycle trip or walk around your town / city, taking
advantage of sights you want to see, streets you know are good for it, ect.
Cycle it once or twice, getting distracted and taking twice as long as
needed to take photographs on the way
Greetings,
This is a research project I started this month:
http://stop.zona-m.net/active-citizens/open-data-open-society-research-
project-about-openness-public-data-eu-local-administ
feedback is welcome, of course! Please forward this announcement as
much as you see fit.
--
Your own civil
BEIJING, May 19 -- An updated standard for Internet map servers will
be implemented next month to avoid state secrets being disclosed and
uncertified maps published online, authorities have said.
The new standard issued by the State Bureau of Surveying and Mapping,
one year after the first
I'm using Google Earth (data cashed via script) and my Garmin 60csx connected
through GPSgate.
The GE cache is limited to 2GB. That's not enough for whole NSW in high res,
but for about 20x60km in highest detail level.
Looks pretty, works well.
Can also use an OSM layer and my private POI
On 2 June 2010 20:59, Eraina and Richard jenkins richardvk...@gmail.com wrote:
I have in mind a project that involves making my old laptop into a
large-screen GPS. Maybe someone on this list can refer me to where
this has been mentioned before. My OS of choice is linux, but the
laptop will
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 6:59 AM, Eraina and Richard jenkins
richardvk...@gmail.com wrote:
I have in mind a project that involves making my old laptop into a
large-screen GPS. Maybe someone on this list can refer me to where
this has been mentioned before. My OS of choice is linux, but the
On Wed, 2 Jun 2010, Eraina and Richard jenkins wrote:
I have in mind a project that involves making my old laptop into a
large-screen GPS. Maybe someone on this list can refer me to where
this has been mentioned before. My OS of choice is linux, but the
laptop will still run winXP, and there
On 2 June 2010 21:14, bened...@cortado.de wrote:
I'm using Google Earth (data cashed via script) and my Garmin 60csx connected
through GPSgate.
The GE cache is limited to 2GB. That's not enough for whole NSW in high res,
but for about 20x60km in highest detail level.
Don't know if you are
Hi Richard,
If you're up to XP; why not use Garmin's nRoute plus OSM.
Perfect auto-routing moving map.
Garmin no longer support or provide downloads for nRoute so have a look at
this GPSAustralia post for details:
http://www.gpsaustralia.net/forums/showthread.php?t=14411highlight=nroute
John
On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 20:59:29 +1000
Eraina and Richard jenkins richardvk...@gmail.com wrote:
I have in mind a project that involves making my old laptop into a
large-screen GPS. Maybe someone on this list can refer me to where
this has been mentioned before. My OS of choice is linux, but the
Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
Navit does wonderfully on my eeepc 701 - the original tiny one
with the modest sized database for all of australia on a SD card
runs on Crunchbang Linux which I find sleek enough for the processor
I run it on my Nokia n810, which has much more limited resources
I'm delighted with the replies to my plea for help. The replies lead
me to ask two more questions:
1. Where is there a tutorial/howto/whatever for Navit. For me
it comes up with a blank screen ... and no maps. I did attempt to
download some maps for SE Australia ... so, how do I proceed
On 3 June 2010 13:31, Eraina and Richard jenkins richardvk...@gmail.com wrote:
1. Where is there a tutorial/howto/whatever for Navit. For me
it comes up with a blank screen ... and no maps. I did attempt to
download some maps for SE Australia ... so, how do I proceed from this
point??
On 3 June 2010 14:00, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 June 2010 13:31, Eraina and Richard jenkins richardvk...@gmail.com
wrote:
1. Where is there a tutorial/howto/whatever for Navit. For me
it comes up with a blank screen ... and no maps. I did attempt to
download
Hi,
hat Dein Parser da Probleme mit dem Rufzeichen ?
Chris
Hi,
höchstens mit dem Ausrufezeichen, siehe '... user=pfoten_weg_!_ ...'.
Meine Vermutung ist auch ein Sonderzeichen, das zu Problemen führt.
Denn die ganzen Fehlermeldungen, die ich gesehen habe, beinhalten nur
Sätze von diesem
Am 1. Juni 2010 23:17 schrieb steffterra steffte...@me.com:
Am 01.06.2010 um 19:35 schrieb Carsten Gerlach:
Also laut Tagwatch von gestern kommt der Tag in Europa 3992 mal und in Asien
3 mal vor. Das sollte doch als ausreichend etabliert gelten.
selbst im August 2009 (OSMDoc) gab es den Tag
Hey,
auf http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Kommunikation habe ich
gesehen, dass es bereits einen Kontakt mit dem LVA NRW gab. Doch das ist
anderthalb Jahre her ;-)
Hat seitdem wieder jemand den Status abgefragt?
Hintergrund: In den letzten Wochen renne ich von einer Verwaltung zur
anderen
Am 2. Juni 2010 10:28 schrieb M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
selbst im August 2009 (OSMDoc) gab es den Tag schon 448 mal, und
nochmal ca. 200 mal mit destination1, 2, etc.
Habt ihr mal ein Gebiet für mich, in dem es schon destination=* an
motorway_link gibt?
Ich würde gerne
Am 02.06.2010 12:34, schrieb Martin Simon:
Habt ihr mal ein Gebiet für mich, in dem es schon destination=* an
motorway_link gibt?
z.B. AK MS Süd (43/1), AK Recklinghausen (43/2)
Chris
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
Leider sind auf den Seiten doch erhebliche Unterschiede was Rollen angeht.
zB:
link - nur auf englischer Seite
stop:number - auf deutsch gestrichen
forward:stop - auf Englisch in Richtung des Weges - auf Deutsch in Richtung
der Linie
Nach was soll ich gehen ?
Sowas wie streichen sollte auch
Die Abfahrten der A38 von Göttingen bis Halle sind auch eingetragen, ich
meine das Kreuz Drammetal A7/A38 sowie Kreuz Kassel-Süd (A7/A44) hätte ich
auch schon eingetragen.
Am 2. Juni 2010 12:58 schrieb Chris66 chris66...@gmx.de:
Am 02.06.2010 12:34, schrieb Martin Simon:
Habt ihr mal ein
Am 30. Mai 2010 13:10 schrieb M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
es ist z.B. Vorschrift, dass in jedem größeren Gebäude in jedem
Stockwerk mehrere Pläne öffentlich aufgehängt sind (z.B. mit
FLuchtwegen, Steigleitungen nass und trocken, Einspeisepunkte,
Brandmeldezentrale,
Hallo,
vom Landesamt für Vermessung und Geoinformation habe ich ein Angebot
über DOPs mit Bodenauflösung 2m erhalten. Unsere ganze Gemeinde soll 50
EUR kosten. Wie viele die Daten nutzen dürfen und wie lange so eine
Lizenz gilt, ist noch nicht geklärt (davon abgesehen, dass für mich
alleine
Manuel Reimer manuel.s...@nurfuerspam.de wrote:
Dafür, dass die Daten letztlich durch Steuermittel finanziert erhoben
wurden, ist das schon recht engstirnig.
Das ist nichts neues, aber es ist eben ein Problem das man politisch lösen
muss.
Was die Parteien betrifft findet man da allerdings
Hallo Manuel,
vom Landesamt für Vermessung
von welchem?
DOPs mit Bodenauflösung 2m
Diese Auflösung eignet sich nicht zur Erfassung von Hausumrissen:
2m: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Luftbilder_aus_Bayern
15cm: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Luftbilder_aus_Lauf
5cm:
Am 02.06.2010 17:47, schrieb Markus:
5cm:
Muss natürlich heissen:
5cm: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Dortmund/Luftbilder
Sorry, Markus
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Hallo Markus,
Am Mittwoch 02. Juni 2010 00:07:03 schrieb Markus:
Wer kann mir aus der Grenz-Relation
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/62549
eine etwas vereinfachte XML machen, mit der man mit OL die bayrische
Grenze anzeigen kann? (für z=7..16)
(oder vielleicht gibt es sowas
Am Mittwoch 02 Juni 2010, 17:14:08 schrieb Manuel Reimer:
vom Landesamt für Vermessung und Geoinformation habe ich ein Angebot
über DOPs mit Bodenauflösung 2m erhalten. Unsere ganze Gemeinde soll 50
EUR kosten. Wie viele die Daten nutzen dürfen und wie lange so eine
Lizenz gilt, ist noch
Naabend,
Am Dienstag 01. Juni 2010 23:17:42 schrieb steffterra:
Hast du mal bitte einen link - ich kam nicht auf diese Zahl.
Schau mal hier: http://tagwatch.stoecker.eu/Europe/De/tags.html
Kann man das
Suchergebnis nach tag-Kombinationen filtern, sodass z.B. nur
motorway_links rauskommen,
Markus liste12a4...@gmx.de wrote:
Wer kann mir aus der Grenz-Relation
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/62549
eine etwas vereinfachte XML machen, mit der man mit OL die bayrische
Grenze anzeigen kann? (für z=7..16)
(oder vielleicht gibt es sowas schon irgendwo?)
Meinst Du sowas?:
Am 02.06.2010 um 10:28 schrieb M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.c
om
selbst im August 2009 (OSMDoc) gab es den Tag schon 448 mal, und
nochmal ca. 200 mal mit destination1, 2, etc.
In welchem Kontext wird denn destination1, destination2, etc. genutzt?
Als Fernziel, dann näheres Ziel?
Am 02.06.2010 20:39, schrieb steffterra:
In welchem Kontext wird denn destination1, destination2, etc. genutzt?
Als Fernziel, dann näheres Ziel?
Vermutlich soll es das bedeuten, ich persönlich habe allerdings mit der
Semikolonschreibweise gemappt (destination=Hamburg;Bremen)
Chris
Hallo,
versucht doch mal den Kontakt zur Energie bzw. Wasserversorger. Die haben auch
Luftbilder. Am besten über Mitarbeiter... ;-). Und positive PR können die
sicherlich gebrauchen... Den Kontakt zur Verwaltung halte ich für aussichtslos.
Vor allem hier in NRW.
Mfg Marc Gehling
Am
Thomas Ineichen osm.mailingl...@t-i.ch wrote:
Wie kommt eigentlich Wikimedia dazu, auch Wiki-fremde Dinge zu unter-
stützen? (Ich glaube zumindest nicht, dass mein Layer all zu bald auf
einer Wiki-Karte erscheint..) Pure Nächstenliebe? :)
Nach meiner Wahrnehmung ist es so gelaufen:
Wikipedia
Tirkon tirko...@yahoo.de wrote:
Auf der letzten Fossgis-Konferenz haben dann die beiden Genannten
zusammen mit Sven Geggus von OSM einen Vortrag und eine Community
Session über die Zusammenarbeit der beiden Projekte abgehalten
Das war ein wenig der Konsolidierung der verfügbaren Zeit für
Am 02.06.2010 22:08, schrieb Tirkon:
Man sah es wohl als sinnvolle Investition an, OSM für den
Wikipedia Gebrauch zu spiegeln und diesbezügliche Tools laufen zu
lassen. Daher wurden die Server angeschafft, IMHO recht kurzerhand.
Das Haupt-Ziel ist es, OSM großflächig in die Wikipedia zu
hi,
gibt es hier was neues?
ich hab in eines meiner osm-files mal den usernamen auf pfoten_weg_!_
geändert - geht immer noch prima.
du kannst es ja mal genau umgekehrt machen, das osm-file ist ja ascii und
mit (fast) jedem editor deiner wahl editierbar.
der username ist fuer mapgen sowieso
hi,
deckt sich genau mit meinen erfahrungen: je höher in der hierarchie man
anfragt (gemeinde/kreis/land oder gar bund) um so politischer wird das
problem.
neu fuer mich ist nur deine erfahrung, dass sich die kleinen auf einmal
auf die lvas beziehen.
einige von uns haben noch die insgemeine
Naabend,
Am Mittwoch 02. Juni 2010 20:39:55 schrieb steffterra:
In welchem Kontext wird denn destination1, destination2, etc. genutzt?
Jetzt fällt mir wieder ein, daß Mirko Küster mal erwähnt hat, mit diesem Tag
Wegweiser an Radwegen zu versehen, also an Knoten mit information=guidepost.
Am 02.06.2010 um 21:41 schrieb Chris66:
Am 02.06.2010 20:39, schrieb steffterra:
In welchem Kontext wird denn destination1, destination2, etc. genutzt?
Als Fernziel, dann näheres Ziel?
Vermutlich soll es das bedeuten, ich persönlich habe allerdings mit der
Semikolonschreibweise
Am 02.06.2010 um 23:37 schrieb Carsten Gerlach:
Naabend,
Am Mittwoch 02. Juni 2010 20:39:55 schrieb steffterra:
In welchem Kontext wird denn destination1, destination2, etc. genutzt?
Jetzt fällt mir wieder ein, daß Mirko Küster mal erwähnt hat, mit diesem Tag
Wegweiser an Radwegen zu
On Wednesday 02 June 2010 00:35:37 Morten Kjeldgaard wrote:
On 01/06/2010, at 23.37, Freek wrote:
Har en af jer kigget ind der? Er det faktisk en haveforening der
tilfældigvis
også har en brevdueafdeling? Der er ofte flere skilte i selve
området med f.e.
praktiske oplysninger. Hvilket
Ursprungligt meddelande
Ämne: Re: [Talk-se] Olika gränser
Datum: Mon, 31 May 2010 21:16:17 +0200
Från: Magnus Österlund o...@home.se
Till: Christoph Matthei christ...@matthei.org
Jag har sett samma fenomen i de områdena jag taggar i utifrån
ekonomisk karta. Men om
1 - 100 di 185 matches
Mail list logo
