Normally this would work out better for me but I'm either going to be
picking up the Cherry Bomb (my truck, so named after an incident in which
an ether-fuelled backfire burned off my beard and half my hair about 3
weeks ago) from the shop or comatose.
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 9:42 PM, Martijn van
-Kester/i-LFFfVns
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 5:22 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
Am 07.03.2015 um 20:34 schrieb Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org:
How do we deal with bus stops that exist
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 5:08 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'd tag them as highway=bus_stop (or whatever scheme you prefer, or both),
and if you want to get detailed add stuff like bench=no, shelter=no etc.
Sounds good. I think I need to roll back and reimport then,
Here in Tulsa (and apparently Wichita as well, along with Cherokee Nation
Transit, Kibois Area Transit System, and presumably most midwestern
agencies) have a concept of deviation area on their routes. In such a
case, you can be picked up or dropped off anyplace they can fit a bus
(usually a
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 5:22 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
wrote:
Am 07.03.2015 um 20:34 schrieb Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org:
How do we deal with bus stops that exist in transit schedules but have
no physical presence?
does the bus stop always at the same stop
How do we deal with bus stops that exist in transit schedules but have no
physical presence?
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org wrote:
Weighing in late here (sorry!), Scout US is currently not using OSM
addresses for search and geocoding.
Might want to turn that on so OSM overrides whatever database it's
currently checking. I haven't intensively used
Sorry for the late notice, I just remembered just just now myself. Tonight
starting at 18:00 running all weekend long, coders, makers and mappers from
metro Tulsa and beyond will be getting together at the Hardesty Arts
Center, 117 N Boston Av, Tulsa.
Bus service available inbound until around
I'm thinking if they wanted broader input, they'd use the mailing list and
not the forum.
But I think a big part of it is the US is very large, and very empty. Plot
out a wall size map of the US, now pin the tail on the map. Unless you
bumped a wall on the way there or have an acute sense of
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
I'm thinking if they wanted broader input, they'd use the mailing list
and not the forum.
But I think a big part of it is the US is very large
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Harald Kliems kli...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue Feb 17 2015 at 1:16:55 PM Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
Are there methods of remote sensing (street-level imagery, data from
other places on the internet) that could help us with the locality problem?
at once to make the outreach worth the time effort (although
they often used pins and paper maps to gather their data given spotty
coverage). I wonder if anyone has ever had an OSM State Fair mapping party?
Eleanor
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote
Could we make this a bit more mobile friendly? It'd be a great timesink
when I'm on a bus I've already collected as much data as I can flying past
everything in the dark on.
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Harald Kliems kli...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue Feb 17 2015 at 2:53:44 PM Paul Johnson
On Feb 5, 2015 5:30 AM, Mike N nice...@att.net wrote:
On 2/4/2015 11:48 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
Generally, it is not feasible to use OSM as a dataset backing an
official GTFS feed. This is because the probability of the GTFS
dataset being uploaded to Google and thereby
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Mike N nice...@att.net wrote:
Generally, it is not feasible to use OSM as a dataset backing an official
GTFS feed. This is because the probability of the GTFS dataset being
uploaded to Google and thereby violating the license if the street
centerlines or
What's the correct tag for unit number, anyway? This is driving me insane
since it's making it impossible to complete mapping the caravan site I live
in to a level of completeness that you can navigate by without trying to
find the unit numbers (which, stupidly, are all on the utility pedestals
Is the new style backwards compatible with the old style? Especially in
regards to potentially having OSM as being the dataset for the official
GTFS feed in an area where the official data presently sucks, it'd be a
travesty if the new style makes going to and from GTFS *more* difficult for
, Darrell Fuhriman darr...@garnix.org wrote:
It seems to be addr:unit, though it’s not widely used. It’s what I’ve been
using, though.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:unit
d.
On Feb 3, 2015, at 12:28, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
What's the correct tag for unit number
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Mike Henson mikehen...@hotmail.com wrote:
Steve,
I agree with Charlotte, In Oklahoma I am seeing a lot of different names
on one rail road line like Charlotte is talking about.
We need to figure out how we're going to map the new Eastern Flyer mass
transit
On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Clifford Snow cliff...@snowandsnow.us
wrote:
On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Natfoot natf...@gmail.com wrote:
The inherent problem with ferry routes is that they have a schedule.
Routers can't then tell their users how long it is going to take without
that
On 2015-01-16 07:52, Paul Johnson wrote:
I'm very much in favor of PA instead of SR for disambiguation purposes.
With James' proposal to change `ref` to `ref:penndot` (or something even
more explicit like `ref:penndot:quadrant`), there's no need for
disambiguation. A prefix of PA isn't
Are they actually separate networks, though? Just because there's more
digits doesn't a different network make.
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Minh Nguyen m...@nguyen.cincinnati.oh.us
wrote:
On 2015-01-16 07:52, Paul Johnson wrote:
I'm very much in favor of PA instead of SR
Alright, in that case, I'm throwing my support into retagging ref=SR
in Pennsylvania to ref:penndot=* en masse, since it's at least an edge-case
useful tag to those familiar with the system but not particularly useful or
obvious for the average user.
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 5:28 AM, James
Not totally sure that relation even needs to exist given that you can fire
off an XAPI request for everything in the US:PA:Turnpike network without it
anyway, but good to know that it's already sorted. But yeah, back to the
point, I think the refs that appear on the blade signs belongs in
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 3:30 AM, Minh Nguyen m...@nguyen.cincinnati.oh.us
wrote:
On 2015-01-19 00:50, Paul Johnson wrote:
Are they actually separate networks, though? Just because there's more
digits doesn't a different network make.
What distinguishes the various networks that a given
OK, so three, possibly four, routes that could have US:PA:Turnpike
relations.
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 4:45 AM, James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com
wrote:
US:PA:Turnpike (possibly only one member?)
There are 3 routes in that (not counting the mainline PA Turnpike
relation).
PA Turnpike 43
I'm very much in favor of PA instead of SR for disambiguation purposes.
On Jan 16, 2015 2:15 AM, James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com wrote:
I have happened to notice (mostly in Eastern Pennsylvania) that some users
have added these routes from the old 'name_*' tags and putting them in the
I understand that there's a difference between signed and unsigned. Oregon
has a similar situation with routes and highways. Highways don't get
signed, routes do. Every state-owned right of way in Oregon has a
highway number and are in ODOT's inventory (including traversable beaches
of the
Given that aeronautical features and road vehicle features have different
namespace, tag it as runway and raceway? This is a surprisingly common
arrangement in the ground truth and plays a prominent role in the original,
US, AU (and very probably, all) versions of Top Gear.
On Jan 15, 2015 7:42
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 10:38 PM, stevea stevea...@softworkers.com wrote:
And here is what I've learned.
This is tedious work, especially a state at at time. It is slow, but that
is because it is a whole (large) state. This is not impossibly large work,
not by a long shot. Yet for one
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 12:16 AM, Clifford Snow cliff...@snowandsnow.us
wrote:
I think the original question is are there bicycle routes that include
Interstate Highways. From what we've learned, Interstate Highways can be
tagged to allow bicycles where permitted by law. But just because
a bit of a road geek, I ask
this very question of my fellow road geeks on our discussion forum. It
seems many states have explicit laws allowing bicycles on the highway.
Follow it here: http://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?topic=14452.0
Elliott
On Mon Jan 12 2015 at 1:51:25 PM Paul Johnson ba
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 1:05 PM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net
wrote:
in fact, here in NYS there is a class of trunk-ish roads
called Urban Expressways where bikes and pedestrians
are forbidden; sometimes it's posted but sometimes it's
not.
Having commuted by freeway by bicycle in a
That was a horrible but especially clever pun.
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org wrote:
Tonight! Be there or be spherical Mercator.
https://plus.google.com/u/0/events/c98gk0o8cjli2crjlcoa6f0vom8
Martijn
___
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 11:43 PM, John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com
wrote:
By contrast, I am not aware of any Interstate highways in the southeast
USA that allow bicycles. From my experience, every entrance ramp has signs
forbidding non-motorized traffic and mopeds.
All the more reason
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Clifford Snow cliff...@snowandsnow.us
wrote:
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Kerry Irons irons54vor...@gmail.com
wrote:
The key question here, it seems to me, is whether there is any “official”
body that claims these sections of I-5 to be a bicycle route.
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Zontine, Chris -(p) chr...@telenav.com
wrote:
While mapping a FIXME in the US this situation came up: WAY ID 8822153.
The FIXME implies this WAY (and others) should have a dual carriageway. As
you can see this is one long stretch of highway=motorway. What is
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 1:54 PM, stevea stevea...@softworkers.com wrote:
I do not agree: again, I find no evidence (from the Oregon DOT map) that
bicycles are explicitly designated legal on I-5. It may be the case that
explicit statute specifies bicycles are allowed on I-5 in Oregon, but
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 8:09 PM, stevea stevea...@softworkers.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 1:54 PM, stevea stevea...@softworkers.com
wrote:
I do not agree: again, I find no evidence (from the Oregon DOT map) that
bicycles are explicitly designated legal on I-5. It may be the case
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Mike Henson mikehen...@hotmail.com wrote:
I have been trying to catch misspelled names of restaurants and fast food
places.
I then came across this wiki page
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Chain_Store_Cleanup#Misspelled_names
What a life saver, after
Is it just me or did Nominatim stop checking an external database for
address lookups where in-DB addresses aren't available in the US?
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Sounds like an analogous situation to the difference between State Highways
and State Routes in Oregon. The shields always have the state route, the
blade markers at bridges and some milemarkers list both the route and the
highway. Not all state highways are members of state routes (since roads
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 6:01 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
wrote:
2014-11-30 4:09 GMT+01:00 Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org:
We have a similar convention in the US for doing that, though usually
requires tagging traffic_sign=maxspeed, maxspeed=?? mph in a few places,
since
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
wrote:
2014-12-01 17:05 GMT+01:00 Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org:
We just get crazy with it. The two signs below tend to be common in
Oklahoma. Entering most towns you see a sign similar to this one:
http
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Clifford Snow cliff...@snowandsnow.us
wrote:
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 8:05 AM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
Entering most counties you get a sign that's printed in FlySpeck 3 font
that reads:
Unless otherwise posted speed limit
35 MPH
on all
On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Minh Nguyen m...@nguyen.cincinnati.oh.us
wrote:
On 2014-11-07 22:35, Greg Morgan wrote:
In contrast to the addr:state debate that we are having, I always
use addr:country key with the US value. The difference here is that
addr:country is an agreed upon ISO
Eeeh, that's not as far out as, say, Hallett
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/36.22111/-96.59435. Though you
might want to fix all those SH and SR refs, can't even tell what state
that's supposed to be in without asking Nominatim.
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 9:05 PM, Hans De Kryger
On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 8:28 PM, Kevin Broderick k...@kevinbroderick.com
wrote:
Having recently moved to Red Lodge, Montana, I'm trying to update some of
the map data around here, as a lot of it is untouched TIGER data that seems
to be fairly imaginative.
Just south of town, US-212 is
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 9:12 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
wrote:
Am 03.11.2014 um 16:03 schrieb Richard Weait rich...@weait.com:
seems access=seasonal isn't in wide use but would be correct
I think that this is not so nice tagging as it doesn't say anything about
which
Also note that Census ZIPs are somewhat fluid, as are postal ZIPs, and
postal ZIPs don't cover the entire country, and postal ZIPs are based on
carrier routes and not an area.
On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net
wrote:
On 11/9/14 3:10 PM, Nathan Mills wrote:
On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 3:10 AM, Shawn K. Quinn skqu...@rushpost.com wrote:
So, a couple of questions:
1. What, exactly, is fair game to change to a state abbreviation
reference?
Fair game nationwide, two letter state abbreviations should be used for the
primary state highway network.
2.
We have a similar convention in the US for doing that, though usually
requires tagging traffic_sign=maxspeed, maxspeed=?? mph in a few places,
since there's often multiple steps from rural speeds to town speeds when
entering a town or city (Oklahoma sense; Oregon would call anything
incorporated
letter abbreviation and in
states that don’t we should use that states standard for example Michigan
uses M. The highway behind my house is M-15 and singed that way so I would
think it should be tagged that way. Am I reading the Wiki wrong?
Thanks
Dave
*From:* Paul Johnson [mailto:ba
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 10:50 PM, Dave Mansfield mansfie...@chartermi.net
wrote:
Please forgive me I’m not trying to stir things up. I’m new to OSM and
trying to learn and I don’t have any idea what the NE2 you refer to is.
Glossing past this since it's extensively in the archives at this
Throwing my hat into this one, I'm thinking the new style also reuses some
of the old style tags and conventions. That said, since I'm not trying to
automate a driverless bus fleet, I tend to only use the old style method.
Coincidentally, this generally works out well for most situations and is
Well, I think a a huge difference between the Hollywood Sign and Mount
Rushmore is Mount Rushmore is clearly a site dedicated to the monument.
The Hollywood Sign, IIRC, is on public property left flat save for the
sign, with no special status. Furthermore, the individual letters are
obviously
I'm willing to argue both cases. Having a role=label relation may be
useful where it may be otherwise ambiguous to properly form a cogent
label. However, in the Hollywood sign's case, just rendering each letter
as a label would be obvious to most people (albeit somewhat unusual) and
helpful
I'm tentatively scheduled to work that day...could you narrow down the
location in Kansas?
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Mike Dupont jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Howdy,
I am working on an free/libre open source software/open knowledge
festival in Kansas on March 21-22 2015,
I've also seen OSM attributed in the legal disclaimer on printed Tulsa and
Oklahoma highway maps. Next time I'm at QuikTrip I might see about
photographing that if I can. Anybody know if Rand McNally is tithing us or
just using our work?
On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Richard Welty
OK, just got back in from Watonga and I'm still rather dehydrated,
exhausted, and think I got a bit of the post-convention blues and a touch
of concrud from a week at Roman Nose State Park for Oklacon 12
http://www.oklacon.com/, which was an especially long drive this time due
to a bridge out in
On Saturday, September 27, 2014, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
Who would I talk to about getting access to create tasks on this Task
Manager? I'd like to help using it to get a solid baseline for completing
at least a fully tiger-reviewed, route-relationed, lane-counted Oklahoma
and assistance are welcome.
Thanks!
Matt Toups
On 09/27/2014 03:04 AM, Alex Barth wrote:
Hey there Paul -
This is you, right?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Paul%20Johnson
I just made you admin on tasks.osm.us.
Alex
On Saturday, September 27, 2014, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org
Yeah, umm...I realize I have a bit of a history on this subject that I'd
rather not rehash in detail right now, but I'm going to have to concur that
we should not go zero to vandalism accusations for what definitely seems
well within a reasonable doubt of being a good faith newbie attempt gone
,
Hans
On Oct 9, 2014 1:12 AM, Shawn K. Quinn skqu...@rushpost.com wrote:
On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 02:44 -0500, Paul Johnson wrote:
Yeah, umm...I realize I have a bit of a history on this subject that
I'd rather not rehash in detail right now, but I'm going to have to
concur that we should not go
Who would I talk to about getting access to create tasks on this Task
Manager? I'd like to help using it to get a solid baseline for completing
at least a fully tiger-reviewed, route-relationed, lane-counted Oklahoma to
start with, which should help everyday users navigate Oklahoma's often
Aah, cool, thanks!
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 3:04 AM, Alex Barth a...@mapbox.com wrote:
Hey there Paul -
This is you, right?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Paul%20Johnson
I just made you admin on tasks.osm.us.
Alex
On Saturday, September 27, 2014, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org
Also sounds like M-3, M-10, etc should probably be tagged MI 3, MI 10...
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 11:11 PM, James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com
wrote:
Just thought I'd give you guys a heads up, but there is a user going
around and adding '-' to all the ref tags he modifies in Michigan.
A
and way refs
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 7:56 AM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
Also sounds like M-3, M-10, etc should probably be tagged MI 3, MI 10...
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 11:11 PM, James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com
wrote:
Just thought I'd give you guys a heads up
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote:
I did do a screenshot, showing rendering in the Seattle area based on
route relations: https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-
carto/issues/596#issuecomment-57001666
This seems broken, especially places where
With these split relations, ways should have forward/backwards, relations
should have cardinal directions in a super relation. Gets to be a real
pain in the ass when ways are using cardinal direction roles.
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 1:23 AM, Minh Nguyen m...@nguyen.cincinnati.oh.us
wrote:
At
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Nate Wessel bike...@gmail.com wrote:
I would not want to see signs placed as a point on the line except maybe
on one-ways. How do other types of road signs indicate directionality? Has
this already been effectively resolved? I don't actually think I've ever
and school one of the cases described
in this code (context). Would also be nice to document these here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source:maxspeed
On Sep 13, 2014, at 8:34 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
Is it maxspeed:source or source:maxspeed? Also, I'd rather see an
explanation than
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 6:52 AM, Tod Fitch t...@fitchdesign.com wrote:
maxspeed:source=* was a thinko (kind of like a typo but different part
of the body). :)
OK, probably, but it does sort nicely in JOSM. Either way, feel free to
fix my mistagging on this...I've used maxpseed:source=* on a
to it waving around everywhere, until it was time to return
it; Don't Go Faster Than This unless you want to have somewhere between a
Bad Time and Prison Time).
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 3:09 AM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 6:52 AM, Tod Fitch t...@fitchdesign.com
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Clifford Snow cliff...@snowandsnow.us
wrote:
I was thinking that this import, once fully documented vetted, could be
accomplished using the Tasking Manager run by the US Chapter.
Would it be possible to create new tasks on this? Because I can think of
a lot
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Tod Fitch t...@fitchdesign.com wrote:
Thus far I've only applied the maxspeed tag to roads with a posted speed
limit. But here in California most residential roads are not posted,
instead there is a state wide prima facie limit:
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Greg Morgan dr.kludge...@gmail.com wrote:
I wonder if 15 mph in a school zone and 25 mph in a residential area are
some sort of federal standard? The source tag might be useful but not much
different than other states.
Not as far as I'm aware. Oregon's
I should also add that in the US, it depends wildly on where you are. In
Oregon, for example, all speed limits on all public roads, regardless of
what government authority actually owns and operates the road, are set by
the Oregon Department of Transportation, period. Yes, everything from a
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 11:52 PM, Clifford Snow cliff...@snowandsnow.us
wrote:
A Task Manager approach is what I had in mind. It would be do able to
place the data in small chunks on Tasking Manager for others to import.
Biggest concern I have is making sure that the import was high quality.
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 12:23 AM, Michael Patrick geodes...@gmail.com
wrote:
A road is a motor vehicle travel way over 50 inches wide, unless
classified and managed as a trail. The II_ROAD_CORE table includes all of
the nationally required data fields representing road characteristics
Complete
).
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Russell Deffner
russell.deff...@hotosm.org wrote:
Well, the road your referring to sounds like a track, if it has no other
significant use than a beautiful and adventurous way to travel
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 6:28 AM, Mike N nice...@att.net wrote:
Landing on the high plains desert in the west does not make a good case
that OSM in the US is broken. Desert imagery cues do not match those of
conventional climates. Those roads likely do exist, but are barely
visible in
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
NO! We would *still* classify them as tracks! Because there's no good
reason to classify them as more major, given consistency. We're trying to
* not* break the routers, after all. Yes, I realize that the vast
at 1:16 AM, Kathleen Danielson
kathleen.daniel...@gmail.com wrote:
A decade of OSM deserves more than a single day of celebration anyway! ;-)
On Aug 9, 2014 7:24 PM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
Tulsa's 10th anniversary party is being postponed, probably one or two
weeks, due
Tulsa's 10th anniversary party is being postponed, probably one or two
weeks, due to venue unavailability. Code for America is helping organize
this, and we had collective amnesia.
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Aah, sounds like the cycle_network proponents may have gotten overzealous,
then; good catch. Could someone check history and contact mappers?
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 6:39 AM, Andy Allan a...@gravitystorm.co.uk wrote:
On 20/07/14 18:29, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 2:17 AM
Likewise, I'm in favor of heirarchies similar to road relations for
cyclists (ie, Portland area network=lcn becomes US:OR:Multnomah:Portland or
US:OR:Metro or US:OR:Multnomah; Tulsa's LCNs would become
US:OK:Tulsa:Riverparks or US:OK:INCOG or US:OK:Tulsa or US:OK:Tulsa:Tusla
or US:OK:Tulsa:Broken
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 2:17 AM, Minh Nguyen m...@nguyen.cincinnati.oh.us
wrote:
On 2014-07-19 23:29, Paul Johnson wrote:
Likewise, I'm in favor of heirarchies similar to road relations for
cyclists (ie, Portland area network=lcn becomes US:OR:Multnomah:Portland
or US:OR:Metro
, Paul Johnson wrote:
I should add that I do not intend on changing state boundaries, just
mapping indian nations where I know the boundaries to lie on the ground, as
higher than state, lower than the country, inside the US only, if that
wasn't clear on the admin level argument. It would still
, but aren't
states. What's the tagging for them relative to the rest of the US?
On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 1:00 AM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
I don't see how that's the case, the reason being that the Supreme Court
has clearly ruled that tribes are above the state but semi-dependant
On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 6:06 AM, Mike N nice...@att.net wrote:
On 7/18/2014 9:49 PM, Tod Fitch wrote:
I thought I'd read up on all the stuff I needed to tag lanes=*,
lanes:forward=*, lanes:backward=*, turn:lanes=*,
turn:lanes:forward=*, turn:lanes:backward=*, etc. But I totally missed
the
...@att.net wrote:
On 7/19/2014 3:37 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
What's the node number at the intersection?
So far, I started on just one of the ways - it's at
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/292617988 . I found my problem: the
JOSM Land and Road Attributes style was correct. I had
I wish I wasn't on site with a client when that came on... now I'm going to
have to find a copy when I get home and aren't posting in the fourth level
of an underground car park waiting for my car's antitheft system to
recognize my key again...
On Jul 8, 2014 2:10 PM, Toby Murray
On Jul 18, 2014 7:40 PM, Mike N nice...@att.net wrote:
2. A very minor thing: When it got to Douglas W Brister Boulevard,
the voice announced it as Douglas West Brister Blvd :-) Otherwise the
text to speech works very well - is there any way to hint that the W is not
a directional?
I
On Jul 18, 2014 7:40 PM, Mike N nice...@att.net wrote:
2. A very minor thing: When it got to Douglas W Brister Boulevard,
the voice announced it as Douglas West Brister Blvd :-)
Another thing that I meant to mention... Scout probably shouldn't try to
expand abbreviations, since the policy on
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 8:49 PM, Tod Fitch t...@fitchdesign.com wrote:
Probably because I wasn't looking for it when searching for how to tag
lanes and because there is no link to the placement:*=* proposal page from
the turn:*=* page in the wiki. Do any data consumers (map renderers,
OK, given pnroman's git maps, and recent court cases, where's the problem
in my proposed tagging of indian nations, overlapping states but below the
US proper?
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
Looks about right. So...what's the issue?
On Wed, Jun 25
a map without such excluded territory at a state level, since, in
practice, there's a LOT of overlap in responsibilities and jurisdiction.
On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
OK, given pnroman's git maps, and recent court cases, where's the problem
in my
Looks about right. So...what's the issue?
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 5:59 PM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote:
On 2014-06-25 3:36 PM, Steve All wrote:
Paul Norman wrote:
I took TIGER data and produced data showing what some states would look
like:
I'm checking with with Tulsa's Code for America brigade if they're
interested in having another mapathon (the first one was largely successful
with about what I would have expected for turnout, even though I overslept
in and was five hours late when I was the one supposed to be giving an
intro!)
401 - 500 of 1038 matches
Mail list logo
