Hi The
On Friday, May 20, 2022 5:07:26 PM you wrote:
> All the problems when TheBat wants to store the decrypted mail to a
> file - #1956, #1233, #1406
> And all the changes of GnuPG where and how the keys are stored - #1406
Sorry, last point was
https://bt.ritlabs.com/view.php?id=2164
--
Hi The
On Friday, May 20, 2022 8:49:29 AM you wrote:
> We are going to address it very soon. If you have specific links to
> BT issues of what bugs you most, please send them to me
All the problems when TheBat wants to store the decrypted mail to a
file - #1956, #1233, #1406
A
Hello Martin,
> Are there any plans to fix the very very old GnUPG bugs in theis Beta
> 10 cycle. Would be very nice - we are waiting now quite a long
> time...
We are going to address it very soon. If you have specific links to BT issues
of what bugs you most, please send t
Hello Stefan,
On Fri, 13 May 2022, at 17:48:24 [GMT +0200] (which was 17:48 where I
live) Martin wrote:
> Are there any plans to fix the very very old GnUPG bugs in theis Beta
> 10 cycle. Would be very nice - we are waiting now quite a long
> time...
Yes, i would appreciate this.
--
Hi
Are there any plans to fix the very very old GnUPG bugs in theis Beta
10 cycle. Would be very nice - we are waiting now quite a long
time...
--
Best regards,
Martin mailto:mar...@postzone.org
TheBat! 10.0.3 Pro (64bit, with OTFE) on Windows 10.0 19043
Hello Stefan,
Please fix MAPI bugs:
https://bt.ritlabs.com/view.php?id=172
https://bt.ritlabs.com/view.php?id=254
https://bt.ritlabs.com/view.php?id=928
https://bt.ritlabs.com/view.php?id=437
--
Regards
Gwen
Using The Bat! Version 9.4.5.3 (32-bit) on Windows 11 10.0 (Build 22000
Hello Jernej,
On Tue, 20 Jul 2021 12:37:31 +0200 GMT (20-Jul-21, 17:37 +0700 GMT),
Jernej Simončič wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 20, 2021, 10:21:33, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
>> My editor window is full screen, and I have these hard LFs. Not always, mind
>> you.
> Looks like the actual problem is
On Tuesday, July 20, 2021, 10:21:33, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
> My editor window is full screen, and I have these hard LFs. Not always, mind
> you.
Looks like the actual problem is that TB is using non-breaking spaces instead
of regular spaces, which then results in weird (non)wrapping (look
ust to
>>> demonstrate the weird wrapping that's happening.
>> Confirmed for 9.4.2.5. Please create a bug report. (The paragraph below is a
>> good example of the suddenly inserted hard LF.)
>> When will the three important HTML bugs (and please add this one a
t; delete a selected word (no idea how to reproduce this, it was
>> completely random). I'm writing this as a single paragraph, just to
>> demonstrate the weird wrapping that's happening.
> Confirmed for 9.4.2.5. Please create a bug report. (The paragraph
> below
ompletely
> random). I'm writing this as a single paragraph, just to demonstrate the
> weird wrapping that's happening.
Confirmed for 9.4.2.5. Please create a bug report. (The paragraph below is a
good example of the suddenly inserted hard LF.)
When will the three impor
Title: Re: 9.4.2.5 HTML bugs still unfixed
Howdy!
Вы писали 17.07.21 г., 5:00:28:
Hello Stefan,
On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 19:18:36 +0300 GMT (16-Jul-21, 23:18 +0700 GMT),
Stefan Tanurkov via TBBETA wrote:
Version 9.4.2.5 is available
https://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat
Hello Thomas,
> Not fixed HTML bugs:
> https://bt.ritlabs.com/view.php?id=2144 Internal links in HTML message are
> not being followed (HTML viewer)
> https://bt.ritlabs.com/view.php?id=2147 Font change in HTML emails (HTML
> editor)
> https://bt.ritlabs.com/view.php?id=2
Hello Stefan,
On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 19:18:36 +0300 GMT (16-Jul-21, 23:18 +0700 GMT),
Stefan Tanurkov via TBBETA wrote:
> Version 9.4.2.5 is available
> https://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tb9.4.2.5-x64.7z
> Here is a short list of changes:
Not fixed HTML bug
Hi,
It's a summary of bugs reported by me and related to a lack of TB!'s
compatibility of the solution used in The Bat! concerning message
display on none native OS.
Why did I write that e-mail?
I didn't pay for a
client I can't read messages with or I need to manually switch coding
back
4: Start with connection center set to show always: connection centre does
not show, only after selecting hide and then again show always will it
appear again. Reported by me quite some time ago, apparently noone cares.
5: IMAP INBOX of an account set to full synchronize / download entire
account tree.
I reported this already with v4.x (maybe even 3.x).
Oh yeah... that bug has been with us for about 10 years, I'd say...
Bugs not fixed for 10 years or longer are nothing unusual for this
software, unfortunately. :-(
--
Yours,
Alex. of Slovakia
www.avenarius.sk
[flying
On Tuesday, January 10, 2012, 5:48:08 PM, Julian Beach (Lists) wrote:
I am having problems with some messages today. There are two messages
that TB! refuses to download - I eventually get The server didn't
reply anything to TImapGetMessageContentTaskUserClicked command in 90
seconds
Marek,
On 11-01-2012 08:13, you wrote in mid:1137807229.20120111081...@ipex.cz:
about filters, what probelms do You have?
mid:1999057432.20111220214...@fjelsten.dk
Are there messages processed by different filter or not filtered at all?
No filtering at all. They just sit in the inbox.
Hello all,
Monday, January 9, 2012, Joe wrote:
3: And most importantly, FILTERS Still nmot working right.
about filters, what probelms do You have? Are there messages processed by
different filter or not filtered?
--
Bye
Marek Mikus
Czech support of The Bat!
http://www.thebat.cz
Using
1: VF's don't work as well as in V4
2: Constant hangs forcing a restart
3: And most importantly, FILTERS Still nmot working right.
The list is endless...
4: Start with connection center set to show always: connection centre does
not show, only after selecting hide and then again show
On Tuesday, January 10, 2012, 3:05:46 PM, Carsten Guthardt-Schulz wrote:
5: IMAP INBOX of an account set to full synchronize / download
entire message. I start TB, having a different folder selected, one
new unread message shows up in that INBOX. I quit TB, cut the
Internet connection, start
Marek,
On 10-01-2012 09:09, you wrote in mid:1651538847.20120110090...@ipex.cz:
3: And most importantly, FILTERS Still nmot working right.
about filters, what probelms do You have?
mid:1999057432.20111220214...@fjelsten.dk
--
greeting Best regards /greeting
author Peter Fjelsten
Hello all,
Tuesday, January 10, 2012, Peter Fjelsten wrote:
Marek,
On 10-01-2012 09:09, you wrote in mid:1651538847.20120110090...@ipex.cz:
3: And most importantly, FILTERS Still nmot working right.
about filters, what probelms do You have?
mid:1999057432.20111220214...@fjelsten.dk
Just installed 5.0.32
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=8929
Still there, VF not working correctly.
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=8932
Still exists, quick search problem (maybe a little different now, but far from
fixed).
Why do I even report these bugs, make videos etc
from fixed).
Why do I even report these bugs, make videos etc if they are not addressed?
This is so frustrating. Surprising that Ritlabs still has beta testers at all.
Agreed. Thank you..
It seems whenever I give my opinion complain on this list, I get the same
old tired excuses...
V 5
Specials, Alternative Forward, third
option Adress all messages to the adress(es) below: has no effect.
The dialog closes, but mails are neither sent nor put into Outbox.
While searching for an alternative way to achieve that goal, we came
across another idea and found further bugs:
Bug 2) Using
Hello all,
Sunday, July 24, 2011, Maxim Masiutin wrote:
Could you please confirm that https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=8308
has been fixed in the recent betas, and also check the other bugs marked as
veiry wait? If you don't have rights to change them to resolved status,
please
Hello Maxim,
MM and also check the other bugs marked as
MM veiry wait?
A short summary about the non-standard issues (a.k.a issues that are
not verify wait and fixed):
This issue is confirmed but is fixed quite a time back:
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=8074
This issue is verify
Sveiki,
Sunday, July 24, 2011, 5:37:32 AM, you wrote:
Hello Tbbeta,
Could you please confirm that
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=8308
has been fixed in the recent betas, and also check the other bugs marked as
veiry wait? If you don't have rights to change them to resolved
Hello Maxim,
MM and also check the other bugs marked as
MM veiry wait?
Those two issues are duplicates and can be closed, because with the
introduction of the information tabs this issue is no longer present:
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6143
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id
Hello Tbbeta,
Could you please confirm that https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=8308
has been fixed in the recent betas, and also check the other bugs marked as
veiry wait? If you don't have rights to change them to resolved status,
please link the bugs here and I will change them
Hello Maxim,
Sunday, July 24, 2011, 4:37:32 AM, among other things, you wrote:
MM Could you please confirm that https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=8308
MM has been fixed in the recent betas, and also check the other bugs marked
as
MM veiry wait? If you don't have rights to change them
Hello Dierk!
On Tuesday, March 8, 2011 at 1:15:44 PM you wrote:
- main window split mode not remembered
Still.
- filters work only partially [e.g. my simple Google Buzz filter -
move own Buzz to trash and mark delete - works opnly for the
first part]
Still [another
Hello TBBETA Members!
just what I stumbled over, more a reminder since all of them have
been in for some builds:
- main window split mode not remembered
- filters work only partially [e.g. my simple Google Buzz filter -
move own Buzz to trash and mark delete - works opnly for the
Hello Dierk,
Tuesday, March 8, 2011, 7:15:44 AM, you wrote:
DH just what I stumbled over, more a reminder since all of them have
DH been in for some builds:
DH- main window split mode not remembered
Confirmed and still annoyed by it.
--
Best regards,
Richard
Hello Darzur,
Saturday, January 15, 2011, 12:48:56 AM, you wrote:
To be honest I don't even know what is the difference between
synchronization and folder refreshing. Both options are present in v4.2
and I'm using only synchronization.
If I understand it correctly it is whether the messages
Hello,
I've found some bugs in this release (testen on IMAP account):
* Mark deleted messages as read isn't working at least on IMAP
account. I have to manually mark as read all my deleted (and unread)
messages.
* It's not possible to set Synchronization mode independently for
every folder
Hello,
I've found some bugs in this release (testen on IMAP account):
* Mark deleted messages as read isn't working at least on IMAP
account. I have to manually mark as read all my deleted (and unread)
messages.
* It's not possible to set Synchronization mode independently for
every folder
Hallo Darzur,
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 16:14:06 +0100GMT (14-1-2011, 16:14 , where I
live), you wrote:
D * It's not possible to set Synchronization mode independently for
D every folder. If I change it for one folder it's changed for all other
D folders.
Confirmed
D * I'm geting Access violation
Hello Darzur,
A reminder of what Darzur typed on:
Friday, January 14, 2011 at 16:14:06 GMT +0100
D * It's not possible to set Synchronization mode independently for
D every folder. If I change it for one folder it's changed for all other
D folders.
And synchronization does not work at all.
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 18:44:17 +0100, Roelof Otten ro-tb-
3ghhmtcd...@public.gmane.org says...
D * I'm geting Access violation when I try to use Mange IMAP folders.
D Maybe it's because I'm using diacritic characters in folder names, but
D it never happened in 4.0.
Cannot confirm, but I've
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 17:28:40 -0600, Stuart Cuddy scuddy-M9tDh7VQui8
@public.gmane.org says...
D * It's not possible to set Synchronization mode independently for
D every folder. If I change it for one folder it's changed for all other
D folders.
And synchronization does not work at all.
Hello NetVicious,
Thank you for the reply. I agree with your points and I think that you have
replied correctly.
--
Best regards,
Maximmailto:m...@ritlabs.com
Current beta is 4.2.33.9 | 'Using TBBETA'
on it and I think it's not yet prepared to be a beta.
Ritlabs needs time for work on it, and we should leave them time for
work instead of bugging they with a date for the release.
On the BT you could see the bugs related to the Alpha if you want to
know more information about the progress
Am 18.09.2010 03:25, schrieb Gleason:
Better to not have a published timeline. That way your critics can't
fault you when you don't meet it.
And you can't be rushed into release before you are prepared to meet the
harsh criticisms of those same critics.
Well, i have been bread to set myself
Hello Jens,
Friday, September 17, 2010, 11:15:15 PM, you wrote:
Thank you, but did you read over my question about a rude timeline?
What do you mean by a rude timeline? We will release the version when
it will be ready.
--
Best regards,
Maxim
Jens Franik wrote:
Am 18.09.2010 03:25, schrieb Gleason:
Better to not have a published timeline. That way your critics can't
fault you when you don't meet it.
And you can't be rushed into release before you are prepared to meet the
harsh criticisms of those same critics.
Well, i have
Maxim,
Hello Jens,
Friday, September 17, 2010, 11:15:15 PM, you wrote:
Thank you, but did you read over my question about a rude timeline?
What do you mean by a rude timeline? We will release the version when
it will be ready
The problems of two people communicating through English when
Hello Jens,
Friday, September 17, 2010, 11:15:15 PM, you wrote:
Thank you, but did you read over my question about a rude timeline?
What do you mean by a rude timeline? We will release the version when
it will be ready.
How long do you think that it might be in Alpha testing. If I
Rick wrote:
Hello Jens,
Friday, September 17, 2010, 11:15:15 PM, you wrote:
Thank you, but did you read over my question about a rude timeline?
What do you mean by a rude timeline? We will release the version when
it will be ready.
How long do you think that it might be in Alpha
Am 18.09.2010 14:14, schrieb Maxim Masiutin:
Thank you, but did you read over my question about a rude timeline?
What do you mean by a rude timeline? We will release the version when
it will be ready.
Well, that is not the answer, that i expected, but it is faithfully of
course :-)
--
Am 18.09.2010 21:07, schrieb Jens Franik:
We will release the version when it will be ready.
Well, that is not the answer, that i expected, but it is faithfully of
course :-)
And of course, i forgot to say: The translation will be made, if it is
ready - do you agree?
--
Jens
Am 18.09.2010 18:42, schrieb Gleason:
How long do you think that it might be in Alpha testing. If I remember
correctly at one point you though it would be in alpha for about 2 months -
that was about a month ago.
See what I mean?
Yes, but my intention has been to push up some facts about
Hello Jens,
Saturday, September 11, 2010, 10:47:09 PM, you wrote:
Is there already any time shedule, Maxim?
I want to be ready for the translation,
not getting into troubles if this happens
suddenly (short bevore some weekend).
Thank you for your Reply, even by PM.
We won't be adding
Am 17.09.2010 20:46, schrieb Maxim Masiutin:
We won't be adding many new strings, so you could start translating now,
although only a small numbers of new strings have been added. We are trying
to use strings from the old IMAP for the new IMAP wherever possible.
Thank you, but did you
Jens Franik wrote:
Am 21.08.2010 09:44, schrieb Maxim Masiutin:
Hello Tbbeta
Is there already any time shedule, Maxim?
I want to be ready for the translation,
not getting into troubles if this happens
suddenly (short bevore some weekend).
Thank you for your Reply, even by PM.
Better to not
Am 21.08.2010 09:44, schrieb Maxim Masiutin:
Hello Tbbeta
Is there already any time shedule, Maxim?
I want to be ready for the translation,
not getting into troubles if this happens
suddenly (short bevore some weekend).
Thank you for your Reply, even by PM.
--
Jens Franik
je...@gmx.de
Am 22.08.2010 02:56, schrieb Jens Franik:
We are looking forward to the best Version of The Bat! since it exists.
Hopefully, i compiled Thunderbird/Lanikai for amd64 and it works like a
charm - but there are not so much Features and Possibilities than in The
Bat!
--
Jens Franik
Hi,
MM We have to implement the Browse deleted message feature and then will
be
MM able to release a beta. We will change however how this feature will work.
It
MM won't open a separate window. Instead, the deleted messages will be
displayed
MM in the same list, with a special mark like
Alto,
On 22-08-2010 12:48, you wrote in
mid:959335567.20100822124...@treadstone79.de:
TheBat's current behaviour is much more logical: If I delete
something, I want it to vanish. If I want to compress a folder, I'll
do so explicitly. And if I want to see deletion-marked messages again,
then
Hello Tbbeta,
If you look to the bugtracker, we have resolved 258 entries so far since
April 2010. JFYI.
--
Best regards,
Maxim mailto:m...@ritlabs.com
Current beta is 4.2.33.9 | 'Using TBBETA'
8/21/2010 7:09 AM
Hi Maxim,
On 8/21/2010 Maxim Masiutin wrote:
MM Hello Tbbeta,
MM If you look to the bugtracker, we have resolved 258 entries so far since
MM April 2010. JFYI.
Applause!
- --
Paul
The Bat! v.4.2.36.4 on Windows 7 Pro 64 bit 6.1.7600
No IMAP No OTFE
Hello Maxim,
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 10:44:02 +0300 GMT (21/Aug/10, 14:44 PM +0700 GMT),
Maxim Masiutin wrote:
MM If you look to the bugtracker, we have resolved 258 entries so far since
MM April 2010. JFYI.
Do you already have a plan when the next beta will be released, so
that we can test?
Am 21.08.2010 09:44, schrieb Maxim Masiutin:
If you look to the bugtracker, we have resolved 258 entries so far since
April 2010.
We are looking forward to the best Version of The Bat! since it exists.
Thank you for your Work!
--
Jens Franik, DE, Stuttgart
Hello Thomas,
Saturday, August 21, 2010, 2:28:27 PM, you wrote:
Do you already have a plan when the next beta will be released, so
that we can test?
We have to implement the Browse deleted message feature and then will be
able to release a beta. We will change however how this feature will
Hello Maxim,
On Sun, 22 Aug 2010 04:36:14 +0300 GMT (22/Aug/10, 8:36 AM +0700 GMT),
Maxim Masiutin wrote:
Do you already have a plan when the next beta will be released, so
that we can test?
MM We have to implement the Browse deleted message feature and then will
be
MM able to release a
Hello Tbbeta,
There are currenty 33 bugs with Verify Wait status at
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Please let me know if any of these bugs were reported by you, so we
could test whether they were actually fixed.
--
Best regards,
Maxim mailto:m...@ritlabs.com
Dear Stuart,
@31-Mar-2008, 23:37 -0400 (01-Apr 04:37 here) [EMAIL PROTECTED] [S]
in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck:
... snip
1) The auto backup backs up to the default location (a drive short of
... snip
S I would certainly like to be able to stop this behavior. I don't
S know where the
Hi Marck,
On Monday, March 31, 2008 at 6:33:52 PM you wrote:
MDP Hi TB Beta list members,
MDP The current release, 4.0.20.0, is behaving here in 2 ways:
MDP 1) The auto backup backs up to the default location (a drive short of
MDP space) despite having been told to store elsewhere in
Hello Marck,
Tuesday, April 1, 2008, 2:44:45 AM, you wrote:
... snip
S I would certainly like to be able to stop this behavior. I don't
S know where the settings are stored. Can anyone help?
That's easy. It's in the Scheduler.
SP Ok, I deleted a bunch of autobackup entries in the Scheduler,
Hi TB Beta list members,
The current release, 4.0.20.0, is behaving here in 2 ways:
1) The auto backup backs up to the default location (a drive short of
space) despite having been told to store elsewhere in another file
on a drive with much more room. Nasty!
2) TB is freezing. It is
Hello Marck,
Monday, March 31, 2008, 7:33:52 PM, you wrote:
Hi TB Beta list members,
The current release, 4.0.20.0, is behaving here in 2 ways:
1) The auto backup backs up to the default location (a drive short of
space) despite having been told to store elsewhere in another file
List of bugs I observe (some of them was mentioned, I just make a
list, none of them is a real show stopper):
1. Still writes into the registry: I have a
HKCU/RIT/Software/Voyager/SmartBat branch
2a. Overwrites the voyager.lng file. I know, it is ok for general
user, but we have our
Hello beta testers.
1. I cannot rename a view mode I have created on the basis of another.
2. On composing a new mail, sometimes the signature is formatted as
specified, sometimes it isn't (and shown with the formatting of
the text). Signature delimiter is the same. MicroEd.
3.
Hello Thomas,
Viewer profiles are associated with character sets.
Not necessarily. You can create profiles without associating them to any
charset.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v4.0.14.7 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 2
Hello Peter,
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 10:01:56 +0100 GMT (26/02/2008, 16:01 +0700 GMT),
Peter Fjelsten wrote:
PF 2. On composing a new mail, sometimes the signature is formatted as
PF specified, sometimes it isn't (and shown with the formatting of
PF the text). Signature delimiter is the
Thomas,
On 26-02-2008 13:32, you wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
PF 2. On composing a new mail, sometimes the signature is formatted as
PF specified, sometimes it isn't (and shown with the formatting of
PF the text). Signature delimiter is the same. MicroEd.
Are you using different
MAU,
On 26-02-2008 13:08, you wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
1. I cannot rename a view mode I have created on the basis of another.
No problem here renaming any view mode, whether existent, new or new
from.
Extremely strange!
--
greeting Best regards /greeting
author Peter Fjelsten
Hello Peter,
1. I cannot rename a view mode I have created on the basis of another.
No problem here renaming any view mode, whether existent, new or new
from.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v4.0.14.7 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 2
Hello Peter,
No problem here renaming any view mode, whether existent, new or new
from.
Extremely strange!
Yes, when problems (bugs) don't happen to everybody they are more
difficult to pin down.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v4.0.14.7 on Windows
Hello Peter,
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 13:49:12 +0100 GMT (26/02/2008, 19:49 +0700 GMT),
Peter Fjelsten wrote:
Are you using different charsets? Viewer profiles are associated with
character sets.
PF Different chartsets in the signature and body text? Not that I know of
PF (I have not set any
No problem here renaming any view mode, whether existent, new or new
from.
Extremely strange!
Yes, when problems (bugs) don't happen to everybody they are more
difficult to pin down.
I know, it will sound strange, but somehow I would compare your EXE
files... E.g. time it was created. Just
Thomas,
On 26-02-2008 14:02, you wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
No, I mean that different charsets trigger different profiles and
therefore different display behaviour. Miguel just said that profiles
don't need to be associated with character sets. How did you create
yours?
Without
Hello Peter,
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:09:36 +0100 GMT (26/02/2008, 21:09 +0700 GMT),
Peter Fjelsten wrote:
No, I mean that different charsets trigger different profiles and
therefore different display behaviour. Miguel just said that profiles
don't need to be associated with character sets. How
Hello Goncalo,
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 23:01:34 + GMT (11/02/2008, 06:01 +0700 GMT),
Goncalo Farias wrote:
MM The Bat! 4.0.12.1 is available at
MM http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tb40121.rar
GF Bugs status:
GF https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6751
GF Not fixed!
GF
Hello Goncalo,
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 23:01:34 + GMT (11/02/2008, 06:01 +0700 GMT),
Goncalo Farias wrote:
MM The Bat! 4.0.12.1 is available at
MM http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tb40121.rar
GF Bugs status:
GF https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6751
GF Not fixed!
GF
Hello TBBETA,
I have been testing this beta and it seems to be very problematic and
unstable (things work initially and then don't)
Spelling -- does not work at all English(british) but does find uuu as an
error but not any other is accepted!
Password entry - repeated
Guten Tag NetVicious,
am Freitag, 25. Januar 2008 um 01:01 schrieben Sie:
, it's there any way to scroll one image opened with the internal
image viewer of The Bat!
I could not view the image Carsten as attached because there is a big
white space on it and I couldn't scroll it.
Hm, i
Hi all,
I'm just testing the new Alpha version and here are the bugs that I recognized
after one day:
- Exchange Account: sometimes hangs on Logging off from server. Task stays in
Connection Centre and is undeleteable.
- Fields on the bottom bar of the editor window (like account name
Hello all,
Thursday, January 24, 2008, Carsten Guthardt-Schulz wrote:
- Fields on the bottom bar of the editor window (like account name) are
not clickable anymore. Before I could click there and change the account.
- Account log cannot be viewed from status bar anymore, need to open
Account
jueves, 24 ene 2008 at 22:55, it seems you wrote:
I'm just testing the new Alpha version and here are the bugs that I
recognized after one day:
, it's there any way to scroll one image opened with the internal
image viewer of The Bat!
I could not view the image Carsten as attached
, it's a minor matter,
right?
Two possible bugs in v. 3.85--should I bring them up again on TBUDL
(since no further comment there) or simply enter a BT issue report?
1) Help/Check for new updates did not function in going from v.
3.81.18 to v. 3.85.01; so might also be dysfunctional in v. 3.85.01
Hello Mary,
on Tuesday, September 5, 2006 you wrote
1) Help/Check for new updates did not function in going from v.
3.81.18 to v. 3.85.01; so might also be dysfunctional in v. 3.85.01
but no way so far to test that.
Am I correct, that TB! is calling
2) When I did the msi install of v. 3.85.01, and clicked Finish, I
was sent back to the beginning of the Installer.
Are you sure you didn't launch the installer twice? Clicking 'Finish'
in the first would have dismissed it and left you looking at the 2nd.
--
Stuart Hemming
Using The Bat!
Hello all,
Tuesday, September 5, 2006, Uwe Steinfeld wrote:
1) Help/Check for new updates did not function in going from v.
3.81.18 to v. 3.85.01; so might also be dysfunctional in v. 3.85.01
but no way so far to test that.
Am I correct, that TB! is calling
Hello Uwe!
On Tuesday, September 05, 2006, 8:56 AM, you wrote:
1) Help/Check for new updates did not function in going from v.
3.81.18 to v. 3.85.01; so might also be dysfunctional in v. 3.85.01
but no way so far to test that.
Am I correct, that TB! is calling
Hello Stuart!
On Tuesday, September 05, 2006, 9:08 AM, you wrote:
2) When I did the msi install of v. 3.85.01, and clicked Finish, I
was sent back to the beginning of the Installer.
Are you sure you didn't launch the installer twice? Clicking 'Finish'
in the first would have dismissed it and
Hello Marek!
On Tuesday, September 05, 2006, 9:08 AM, you wrote:
I cannot confirm on this, everything was fine for me.
no problem here too.
Thanks, Marek.
Well, it may be local to me. Let's see how my next TB! msi install
goes, whenever that occurs.
Meanwhile, I'm a happy camper.
V. 3.85
Well, it may be local to me. Let's see how my next TB! msi install
goes, whenever that occurs.
As a test you could just try installing the currnt version over the
top of itself.
--
Stuart Hemming
Using The Bat! v3.81.15 Beta on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack
2 Aided by , MyGate v1.0,
1 - 100 of 519 matches
Mail list logo
