Hello Raymund,
Tuesday, September 18, 2012, 11:46:58 PM, you wrote:
RT> Hi TB-Beta,
[*] Photo of the recepient is shown (if available) for messages in the
Sent and Outbox folder
VA>>> Why not in sub-folders of Sent folder, too?!
>> You have sub-folders of your Sent folder? I have neve
Hello Ivan,
Tuesday, September 18, 2012, 4:02:27 PM, you wrote:
>> A question I ask myself every now and then: is it enough to report
>> an issue here for RIT to notice it, or do I definitely need to
>> create a record in the bugtracker for a topic to be noticed?
IP> Completely depends on how
Hello Volker,
Tuesday, September 18, 2012, 3:44:20 AM, you wrote:
>> [*] Photo of the recepient is shown (if available) for messages in the Sent
>> and Outbox folder
VA> Why not in sub-folders of Sent folder, too?!
You have sub-folders of your Sent folder? I have never heard of that.
What woul
Hello Ethan,
Monday, September 17, 2012, 11:10:06 PM, you wrote:
EJM> It will not run.
Do you get any error message, or will your Windows hang, any other
symptoms?
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/
Message reply created with The Bat! 5.2
under Windows X
Hello Rick,
Sunday, August 26, 2012, 9:25:59 AM, you wrote:
MP>>> Ditto is not being used in Dutch.
>> We use "dito" in German.
>> In academia, we use "ibid." (in English texts) - I don't know where this
>> came from.
R> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ibid.
Tq.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
http://th
Hello Maxim,
Wednesday, August 22, 2012, 4:03:40 AM, you wrote:
MM> Please try 5.2 MSI files and let us know whether it installs properly.
MM> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/thebat_pro_5-2.msi
Installed just fine.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-home
Hello Mark,
Saturday, August 25, 2012, 10:49:55 PM, you wrote:
>>> Idem Dito (still wonder why the English were more influenced by the
>>> Italians than by the latin language and thus say
>>> "ditto").
L>> Well, in latin it should be "dictus".
MP> [This starts to smell fishy :-) ]
MP>
Hello Raymund,
Tuesday, August 21, 2012, 1:08:07 PM, you wrote:
>> Does any one have a proposed solution?
RT> If you copy the text you want (as it is obviously one part of it) and
RT> then click reply to all and delete the original quote and then
RT> 'Edit|Paste as quotation from' that should wo
Hello Tbbeta,
My way of working: I flag messages for a certain purpose.
My View setting: I display Folder View as thread view.
When I mark the first message in a new thread with crtl-G, all
messages in that thread are marked. This is a new behaviour, and I
don't appreciate it. I have to manually
Hello TBBETA,
Wednesday, August 8, 2012, 10:49:00 PM, you wrote:
VK>> Unfortunately, the inline image is not being displayed in the same program.
[...]
VK>> Is this a valid issue?
TF> Not confirmed with 5.1.6.7. I hope the attached screenshot comes through.
For clarification:
The inline image
Hello Viktor,
Wednesday, August 8, 2012, 8:51:49 PM, you wrote:
VK> Unfortunately, the inline image is not being displayed in the same program.
VK> When I try to import the message in Thunderbird, there is an error
VK> message saying something like "Message contains bare newlines".
VK> To exclude
Hello List,
Thursday, July 19, 2012, 12:11:15 AM, you wrote:
TF> I have now created a report for this issue:
TF> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=44
RP Thanks, I have added a note.
TF> I still find it quite unusual for an email client to have to hit
TF> "reply" to see the embed
Hello List,
Wednesday, July 18, 2012, 1:34:07 AM, you wrote:
TF> Tuesday, July 10, 2012, 10:00:33 PM, Thomas wrote:
TF I have now created a report for this issue:
TF https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=44
RP>>> Thanks, I have added a note.
TF> It is quite annoying to not see the embe
Hello Ritlabs,
Tuesday, July 10, 2012, 10:00:33 PM, Thomas wrote:
TF>>> I have now created a report for this issue:
TF>>> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=44
RP>> Thanks, I have added a note.
It is quite annoying to not see the embedded pictures. When will we be
able to see them?
As menti
Hello Steven,
Wednesday, July 11, 2012, 10:32:07 PM, you wrote:
SPV>> ...Since I'm not sure about attaching images
SPV>> to messages in the group, I've put screen caps of what I
SPV>> see when a simple message with one embedded image was viewed
SPV>> in Thunderbird (tb), RoadRunner (rr) and Squir
Hello Stuart,
Tuesday, July 10, 2012, 9:35:01 PM, you wrote:
TF>> But now, all folders show deleted message in strike-out font! Now,
TF>> that is a bit anniying. I cannot rule out that I hit a keyboard
TF>> shortcut but would appreciate a way to not see the deleted messages.
SC> Try Folder/Brows
Hello Roger,
Tuesday, July 10, 2012, 9:02:52 PM, you wrote:
RP>>> How do we send bug reports now?
TF>> Same as usual. the bugtracker is up and running, it only lost all of
TF>> the old bug reports.
RP> OK. I had to open a new account to gain access.
I had to do that too.
TF>> I have now creat
Hello Tbbeta,
What I do in my main account every three months is create a new folder
(this time "2012 Q2") and move all messages for that quarter there for
archiving purposes.
With an average of 150-200 message per day, many of them having
attachments, that usually takes a while. No problem.
Thi
Hello Roger,
Tuesday, July 10, 2012, 11:37:32 AM, you wrote:
RP> Hello Thomas,
RP> Tuesday, July 10, 2012, 4:04:22 AM, among other things, you wrote:
RO>>> Hallo Roger,
RO>>> On Wed, 4 Jul 2012 08:19:54 +0200GMT (4-7-2012, 8:19 , where I live),
RO>>> you wrote:
RP Since we have had a choic
Hello RS,
Friday, July 6, 2012, 10:10:43 AM, you wrote:
RF> My issue here is:
RF> - TB! freeze for about 1-1.5min when e-mail is opened for the first
RF> time,
RF> - CPU usage jumps to 55-75% ; memory usage jumps from 80MB to 125MB
RF> for that e-mail,
RF> - any another opening of an e-mai
Hello Roelof,
Wednesday, July 4, 2012, 3:49:37 PM, you wrote:
RO> Hallo Roger,
RO> On Wed, 4 Jul 2012 08:19:54 +0200GMT (4-7-2012, 8:19 , where I live),
RO> you wrote:
RP>> Since we have had a choice of what HTML viewer to use I have used the
System
RP>> HTML viewer without any problem. Yes
Hello Viktor,
Monday, July 2, 2012, 3:25:39 PM, you wrote:
VK> since 5.1.6.7 two ghost form elements appear in my "message move" window
VK> that were nt there in 5.1.6.6 (just double-checked) and do not seem to have
VK> a purpose there.
VK> See screenshot:
VK> http://www.vergangen.de/data/thebat
Hello Dwight,
Friday, June 29, 2012, 7:59:14 AM, you wrote:
DAC>>> After highlighting message, mashing crtl-v (or -c), starting to type
DAC>>> the name of the target folder does nothing.
>> Confirmed both for pop3 and imap accounts
DC> I was about to try to create a bug tracker report, bu
Hello Maxim,
Tuesday, June 26, 2012, 10:07:53 PM, you wrote:
MM> The Bat! 5.1.6.7 is available at
MM> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/a-5/tb5167.rar
MM> What's new in 5.1.6.7 since 5.1.6.6:
MM> [-] Stack overflow when trying to parse malicious or malformed HTML with
too many nest
Hello Steven,
Tuesday, June 19, 2012, 7:21:19 PM, you wrote:
SPV> Lastly, none of this matters to me because I consider it
SPV> totally insane to EVER click a link in an email, for security
SPV> reasons. I always retype them into my browser or perhaps
SPV> copy and paste them, but clicking can a
Hello RS,
Saturday, June 16, 2012, 9:03:10 PM, you wrote:
>>> Another problem with IMAP is that the messages have to actually be
>>> kept on the server.
>> that's not the problem with IMAP, it's the beauty of IMAP. It's the
>> whole point.
RF> Up to the moment your e-mail box is equal
Hello Vilius,
Saturday, June 16, 2012, 1:26:23 PM, you wrote:
>> Another problem with IMAP is that the messages have to actually be
>> kept on the server. I keep 14 days worth of mail on the server, older
>> mails are on my laptop and my PC. If I keep more than say, 2,000 or
>> 3,000 messages on
Hello Dwight,
Saturday, June 16, 2012, 6:03:22 PM, you wrote:
>> Another problem with IMAP is that the messages have to actually be
>> kept on the server.
DC> that's not the problem with IMAP, it's the beauty of IMAP. It's the
DC> whole point.
This also goes into another philosophy: Do w
Hello Stuart,
Saturday, June 16, 2012, 9:40:37 PM, you wrote:
>> Then I would have IMAP emulating POP...
S> The main reason I use IMAP is the ability to have two computers with the same
S> messages on both, all sent messages on both, all messages I have read marked
as
S> read, etc. If you only
Title: Re: Statistics for sausagesocialclub: mei 2012
Hello Eddie,
Please do not use my FROM name and signature when posting here. Make it clear that it is a forward. It is bad style to make people think somebody else sent the message.
Brgds,
Thomas (the real one).
Sunday, May 20, 2012, 11:30
Hello Scuddy,
Friday, June 15, 2012, 9:49:07 PM, you wrote:
TF>> With IMAP I have only the headers on the computer. I want to open a
TF>> mail and the attachments, it takes ages which I have to spend in front
TF>> of the computer.
smn> Why not set it to download everything and then you have the
Hello Maxim,
Wednesday, June 13, 2012, 9:28:21 PM, you wrote:
MM> The Bat! 5.1.6.4 is available at
MM> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/a-5/tb5164.rar
MM> What's new in 5.1.6.4 since 5.1.6.3:
MM> [-] Again some fixes in time zone handling to make loading of
MM> large folders on XP
Hello Thomas,
Saturday, June 16, 2012, 11:54:38 AM, you wrote:
MM>> Message Dispatcher didn't work properly in 5.1.6.1 MSI, could you
MM>> please try those files. If you had installed 5.1.6 before, please
MM>> uninstall The Bat! prior to installing 5.1.6.2
MM>> http://www.ritlabs.com/d
Hello Maxim,
Thursday, May 10, 2012, 9:11:04 PM, you wrote:
MM> Message Dispatcher didn't work properly in 5.1.6.1 MSI, could you
MM> please try those files. If you had installed 5.1.6 before, please
MM> uninstall The Bat! prior to installing 5.1.6.2
MM> http://www.ritlabs.com/download
Hello Dwight,
Thursday, May 3, 2012, 8:15:48 PM, you wrote:
>> Just picking this post to throw in another argument for POP you guys
>> may not be aware of: Slow internet connection.
DC> so is it faster when you download same data with POP than with IMAP?
DC> And will you be switching to POP
Hello Cees,
On Sun, 13 May 2012 21:20:14 +0200 GMT (14/May/12, 2:20 AM +0700 GMT),
Cees wrote:
> okay... but at least it got ME to write again... ;-)
Watch this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=gkfVdrtLcRs
Come back when you've completed the whole video. That'll teach
Hello Paul,
Tuesday, May 1, 2012, 10:57:05 PM, you wrote:
>>> The message base is not local.
R>> Is that not the nature of the beast? If you want security, us POP
PVN> Yup!
Just picking this post to throw in another argument for POP you guys
may not be aware of: Slow internet connection.
Hello Tony,
Monday, April 30, 2012, 5:36:01 PM, you wrote:
>> If Tony is the only one having this problem, I might give it a try.
TH> Go on. I'm desperate for someone else to confirm the problem. You can
TH> always downgrade to 5.0.36.2 if you do have the problem.
I'll check this first and will
Hello Rick,
Monday, April 30, 2012, 7:50:41 AM, you wrote:
>> (Delayed sending already exists in v4).
R> Yes but it was finally FIXED by v5.
No problem, I am not using this feature.
R> As for lesser bugs, ONE irritant is that when exiting templates (I
R> use a couple of folder templates) AUTOW
Hello Rick,
Sunday, April 29, 2012, 11:00:45 PM, you wrote:
>> 4/29/2012 10:19 AM
>> Hi Thomas,
>> On 4/29/2012 Thomas Fernandez wrote:
TF>>> Over 100 filters though, that's why I am reluctant: If it ain't broke,
TF>>> don't fix it.
>>
Hello MAU,
Sunday, April 29, 2012, 2:40:53 PM, you wrote:
>> Does anybody still have any issues with filters? If so, kindly advise
>> whether you are using POP or IMAP.
M> I use a number of Incoming, Outgoing, Read and Replied filters (account
M> filters, not common) and they are all working fin
Hello MAU,
Sunday, April 29, 2012, 5:02:42 AM, you wrote:
>> Only if you suffer from this problem. To date Tony, and perhaps MAU
>> are the only victims of which I am aware.
M> No, I don't have the so called 'time zone' problem. I just saw one
M> single message with an erroneously converted
Hello Tbbeta,
There were some reports about filters not working correctly. I never
saw any fixes in the changelogs. Filters are crucial for me and the
reported problems are the main reason why I haven't upgraded to v5
yet.
Does anybody still have any issues with filters? If so, kindly advise
whet
Hello Scuddy,
Saturday, April 28, 2012, 7:19:38 PM, you wrote:
>>> I'm a POPist
E>> Me too :)
smn> Yes, well us IMAPovians have rights too. :>)
Understood, but we are an endangered species. :-)
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/
Message reply created with
Hello Raymund,
Friday, April 27, 2012, 11:30:31 PM, you wrote:
RT> Hi Thomas,
>> I think that IMAP and POP3 should be categories, and the Mail
>> Management items should be subcategories under each. Filters under
>> IMAP may be a different animal from filters under POP.
RT> I expect filters and
Hello MAU,
Saturday, April 21, 2012, 11:37:41 PM, you wrote:
>> Sure. The only problem is you need to be reading e-mail on 2 different
>> computers to really do any testing.
M> Ha, ha! You pointed me to the perfect excuse, I only have one computer ;-)
You don't have one of those handheld comput
Hello Tony,
Monday, April 23, 2012, 10:00:31 PM, you wrote:
TH> Hello Maxim,
TH> :-(
I was almost ready to download it. Show stopper.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/
Message reply created with The Bat! 4.2.44
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack
Hello Joerg,
Saturday, April 21, 2012, 6:24:02 AM, you wrote:
JS> Okay, so please update also to the latest version of Mantis 1.2.10 from
JS> April 1st, 2012. Version 1.2.8 has some serious security issues.
A bug in a bug-tracking software. Sound ironic but does make sense.
But, pray tell, what
Hello Raymund,
Saturday, April 21, 2012, 3:14:44 PM, you wrote:
>> If you have suggestions on the full list of categories, please let us know.
RT> First I would like to see sub categories so that it is easier for
RT> development to see which areas are problematic.
RT> With that I suggest some
Hello RS,
Monday, April 23, 2012, 9:47:12 PM, you wrote:
>>> We have lost the mantis bugtracker database. We are sorry about that
>>> and
>>> would like to apologize for your efforts being lost. Could you please
>>> visit
>>> the www.ritlabs.com/bt/ URL again and create new logins for
Hello Steven,
Friday, April 20, 2012, 10:22:13 PM, you wrote:
BR>> I watched these videos in tears, which some of you will understand.
SPV> I felt much the same when I visited her in the VAB
SPV> about a week before she left...
SPV> http://www.svalli.com/files/Discovery120406.jpg
You also gott
Hello Dwight,
Friday, April 13, 2012, 10:55:12 AM, you wrote:
>> Forgive me for asking for clarification: If caught with the wrong reg
>> code for TheBat, I will be strip-searched?
DC> if they take you in. I got locked up once because I got a traffic
DC> ticket (illegal right turn) in a st
Hello Dwight,
Sunday, April 8, 2012, 9:39:40 PM, you wrote:
>> You mean this is true? That would be scary indeed.
DC> the strip search part.
DC>
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/03/us/justices-approve-strip-searches-for-any-offense.html?_r=1&scp=2&sq=strip%20searcj&st=cse
Forgive me for asking
Hello Dwight,
Sunday, April 8, 2012, 6:21:17 AM, you wrote:
DC> On Saturday, April 7, 2012, 11:59:11 AM, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
DC>
R>>> If you are in the US, your violation of the Digital Millennium Act
R>>> will be noted, you will be arrested, strip searched an
Hello Rick,
Saturday, April 7, 2012, 10:53:23 PM, you wrote:
>> I Installed a new Computer for my client. When entering the
>> registration code on his TB! I wrongly entered MY Reg Code instead HIS
>> Reg Code.
>> How can I rectify this?
R> If you are in the US, your violation of the
Hello Marek,
Monday, March 19, 2012, 11:41:44 PM, you wrote:
MM> Hello all,
MM> Monday, March 19, 2012, Dierk Haasis wrote:
>>> yes, v5 decodes winmail.dat and it is done automatically, so if You see any
>>> body or attachment, they were decoded from TS-TNEF.
>> In that case I sit enlightened.
Hello Marek,
Monday, March 19, 2012, 10:38:02 PM, you wrote:
MM> yes, v5 decodes winmail.dat and it is done automatically, so if You see any
MM> body or attachment, they were decoded from TS-TNEF.
Guessing that you mean v5 of TheBat!, this is extremely good news!
Once they can guarantee that th
Hello Tony,
Friday, February 17, 2012, 7:33:47 PM, you wrote:
TH> Could someone please explain all the files in the mail directory?
TH> .BCK (old)
TH> .BK0 (old)
TH> .BK1 (old)
TH> .BK2 (old)
TH> .IB0
TH> .IB1
TH> .IB2
TH> .IBK
These are back-up files created when there is a problem during fold
Hello Tbbeta,
I just wanted to search on the BT system, and Firefox warned me as
follows:
> This Connection is Untrusted
>
> You have asked Firefox to connect
> securely to www.ritlabs.com, but we can't confirm that your connection is
> secure.
> Normally, when you try to con
Hello Chris,
On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 11:37:44 + GMT (24/Nov/11, 18:37 PM +0700 GMT),
Chris Wilson wrote:
CW> I have had a crash and my BAT backup on this PC doesn't contain some
recently
CW> created filters. I have a current backup on another PC, which file
CW> holds the filters, and can I just
Hello Gunivortus,
On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 15:02:19 +0100 GMT (22/Nov/11, 21:02 PM +0700 GMT),
Gunivortus Goos wrote:
>> Just a question: Are you using POP or IMAP?
GG> POP3. Never used IMAP, nor do I have any plans to do that.
GG> After creating the filters new, they're working... knocking on wood.
Hello Gunivortus,
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 08:48:33 +0100 GMT (21/Nov/11, 14:48 PM +0700 GMT),
Gunivortus Goos wrote:
GG> The sorting office filtering does not work properly;
GG> my old filters from v4 work fine, all new ones I made in v5
GG> don't work. Nevertheless, I created them the same as the
GG
Hello Dwight,
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 22:04:57 -0500 GMT (16/Sep/11, 10:04 AM +0700 GMT),
Dwight Corrin wrote:
C&P:
I think we are experiencing the same thing. I use the micro editor.
The> works as a signal for quoted text for how many spaces you have
specified. In this message the line that st
Hello Dwight,
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 16:06:14 -0500 GMT (16/Sep/11, 4:06 AM +0700 GMT),
Dwight Corrin wrote:
> Maybe we should try to figure out why you experience something else
> than I do. I use MicroEd in Plaintext. How about you?
I think we are experiencing the same thing. I use the micro e
Hello Tony,
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 10:34:25 +0100 GMT (15/Sep/11, 16:34 PM +0700 GMT),
Tony Hoare wrote:
TH> Did anyone see my message with then following text?
TH> --
TH> I have a virtual folder of flagged messages. Touch one of those and it
TH> becomes unread and the flag is removed.
TH>
Hello Sean,
On Fri, 2 Sep 2011 06:50:38 +0100 GMT (02/Sep/11, 12:50 PM +0700 GMT),
Sean Rima wrote:
SR> I get emails from play.com and they render far too much to the right
SR> of the screen, so much they bleed off.
SR> example: http://z.thecivvie.org/o7ewNN
Please forward the original mail (
Hello Dierk,
On Fri, 2 Sep 2011 07:57:24 +0200 GMT (02/Sep/11, 12:57 PM +0700 GMT),
Dierk Haasis wrote:
>> I get emails from play.com and they render far too much to the right
>> of the screen, so much they bleed off.
DH> Same here with the occasional Amazon offer [not sure which, Germany,
DH>
Hello Dierk,
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 16:39:13 +0200 GMT (18/Aug/11, 21:39 PM +0700 GMT),
Dierk Haasis wrote:
>> Is there a bug tacker entry for this?
DH> I didn't open one because it is so elusive.
OK, and you and this user seem to be the only ones experiencing it.
Thanks anyway.
--
Cheers,
Tho
Hello Dierk,
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 20:05:13 +0200 GMT (18/Aug/11, 1:05 AM +0700 GMT),
Dierk Haasis wrote:
>> I don't use IMAP, so I am just relaying this. Did the sound work in v4
>> and not any more in v5? Or is he doing something wrong?
DH> Sometimes it works, sometimes not. I haven't a clue why
Hello TBBETA,
A member of the German newsgroup for TB! is using IMAP and v5.
He says that the sound for "new mail" rang for him previously and that
it doesn't work any more. He considers this a pity, as he moved from
Thunderbird to TheBat because of the acoustic alert.
I don't use IMAP, so I am
Hello Uwe,
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 18:47:56 +0200 GMT (17/Aug/11, 23:47 PM +0700 GMT),
Uwe Steinfeld wrote:
>> Seeing that I rely heavily on filters and I have absolutely no trouble
>> with v4, I am reluctant to try v5. Maybe you can ease my fears.
US> FWIW, I have absolutely no problems with f
Hello Paul,
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 18:26:29 -0400 GMT (12/Aug/11, 5:26 AM +0700 GMT),
Paul Van Noord wrote:
aas>> I must say I reverted from Version 5 back to Version 4.2.44.2 due
aas>> to dysfunctional VF, or to be more precise: dysfunctional MailTicker
aas>> window (which is likewise a virtual fol
Hello Arjan,
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 11:12:46 +0200 GMT (16/Aug/11, 16:12 PM +0700 GMT),
Arjan de Groot wrote:
>>>See message mid:105876498.20110722212...@otten.tv,
>>under Voyager - double-click on message ID doesn't cause no action - no
>>search for message, no error alert, just nothing.
AdG>
Hello Rick,
On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 21:01:37 -0400 GMT (15/Aug/11, 8:01 AM +0700 GMT),
Rick wrote:
R> I am having almost no trouble with my filters, but I have all POP
R> accounts, so I don't know if that makes a difference
Being a POP person myself, I am curious: What do you mean by "almost"
no tro
Hello Alto,
On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 20:49:49 +0200 GMT (11/Aug/11, 1:49 AM +0700 GMT),
Alto Speckhardt wrote:
TF>> They are (were?) very useful in v4, as they updated automagically.
AS> Not here, I'm afraid: In v4 a VF worked correctly exactly once, right
AS> after it had been created. If TB was sh
Hello Alto,
On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 09:45:01 +0200 GMT (10/Aug/11, 14:45 PM +0700 GMT),
Alto Speckhardt wrote:
>> After about 30s the message count was updated to a correct number but
>> after another 3-4 minutes they all had 0 count again.
AS> Virtual Folders are only updated after the "parent" fo
Hello Stuart,
On Fri, 1 Jul 2011 09:46:47 -0500 GMT (01/Jul/11, 21:46 PM +0700 GMT),
Stuart wrote:
S> Just testing filters:
Thanks, the reported bug are the show-stopper for me.
S> a) Copy to another folder worked
S> b) Mark message as unread worked
S> c) Set Color group worked
S> d) Export me
Hello Stuart,
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 18:25:12 -0500 GMT (28/Jun/11, 6:25 AM +0700 GMT),
Stuart wrote:
>> Sent folder, shows messages "Received" it should say "Sent" There is
>> no option to add "Sent" column to folder view mode.
S> You could use Created date.
This is not a beta issue. The column
Hello Roelof,
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:59:26 +0200 GMT (17/Jun/11, 23:59 PM +0700 GMT),
Roelof Otten wrote:
SH>> Has anyone else noticed that the resend option (to resend a
SH>> previously sent e-mail) only places it in the outbox and doesn't
SH>> actually send it unless you open it and send it?
R
Hello Martin,
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 11:42:34 +0200 GMT (11/Jun/11, 16:42 PM +0700 GMT),
Martin Schoch wrote:
>> Graphic is attached for testing
MS> I saved the gif file from the message and had a look in a IrfanView -
MS> it is truncated as well.
It is not truncated in TB!v4 or in IE8.
>> Confir
Hello Steve,
On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 10:29:38 +0100 GMT (07/Jun/11, 16:29 PM +0700 GMT),
Steve Harris wrote:
SH> This has never worked in all versions 4 and 5 including current betas -
just wanted to confirm.
"version 4" is my key. :-)
SH> If you create a quick template (Plain Text Format) and writ
Hello RS,
On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 13:23:04 +0800 GMT (06/Jun/11, 12:23 PM +0700 GMT),
RS (FEDARA) wrote:
RF> Thank you for a prompt reply.
Most welcome.
RF>>> Is version 4.22 working properly as it should?
RF> I did try 3.99 version for a month and I was using it daily with lots
RF> of e-mails a
Hello RS,
On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 16:31:00 +0800 GMT (06/Jun/11, 15:31 PM +0700 GMT),
RS (FEDARA) wrote:
RF> The only strange think was that all VF were empty up to the moment
RF> when each of them was selected and ESC was pressed. After that
RF> messages appeared.
Not a big deal, it's a
Hello RS,
On Sun, 5 Jun 2011 21:05:35 +0800 GMT (05/Jun/11, 20:05 PM +0700 GMT),
RS (FEDARA) wrote:
RF> Is version 4.22 working properly as it should?
IMHO, TB!v4 is the best POP client in the world. No Access Violations, no
memory leaks that I am aware of, filters work flawlessly and Virtual
Fo
Hello Maurice,
On Fri, 3 Jun 2011 09:39:44 +0200 GMT (03/Jun/11, 14:39 PM +0700 GMT),
Maurice Snellen wrote:
>> Are there any planes to develop the address book regarding full sync
>> with Gmail. Even now the GMail address book is NOT correct imported.
MS> I would like to second this. The curre
Hello Steve,
On Wed, 1 Jun 2011 19:18:18 +0100 GMT (02/Jun/11, 1:18 AM +0700 GMT),
Steve Harris wrote:
SH> I have already posted a similar bug report.
This is a different issue, albeit also with filters.
SH> Number 0008682
Please always post to complete link, so that it is easy for people to
t
Hello Tbbeta,
A user on TBUDL has the following problem with the release version
5.0.12:
QUOTE
I have a filter that has been in use for many years that filters all emails
addressed to a specific address, it moves them to a folder marks the message
as Read and then Parks it.
This has worked well
Hello Robin,
On Wed, 25 May 2011 07:00:29 +0200 GMT (25/May/11, 12:00 PM +0700 GMT),
Robin Anson wrote:
SH>>> If you "park" on a message in the inbox and then press return or
SH>>> double click to open it into a new window then in v4 the focus was
SH>>> on the e-mail text pane
>>
>> No, it wasn'
Hello Steve,
On Tue, 24 May 2011 17:16:25 +0100 GMT (24/May/11, 23:16 PM +0700 GMT),
Steve Harris wrote:
SH> Not sure if I explained it enough.
SH> If you "park" on a message in the inbox and then press return or
SH> double click to open it into a new window then in v4 the focus was
SH> on the e
Hello F.P.,
On Tue, 24 May 2011 18:38:03 +0200 GMT (24/May/11, 23:38 PM +0700 GMT),
F.P. wrote:
FP> a little bit more as the last days my wife tells me shes pregnant
FP> :D
Congratulations! :-)
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/
Message reply created with
Hello Marek,
On Tue, 17 May 2011 21:23:19 +0200 GMT (18/May/11, 2:23 AM +0700 GMT),
Marek Mikus wrote:
>>> If it's improper coding matter - manual switch to Chinese coding
>>> and back to UTF-8 should not change anything, right?
>> The problem is likely that HTML encoding and MIME part enc
Hello RS,
On Mon, 16 May 2011 11:53:12 +0800 GMT (16/May/11, 10:53 AM +0700 GMT),
RS wrote:
RS >> If you could fix as well direcr opening attachments would be
RS >> much appreciated :)
R> I meant here unability to open directly files with Chinese characters
R> in the name (described in the
Hello Dwight,
On Sat, 14 May 2011 11:58:27 -0500 GMT (14/May/11, 23:58 PM +0700 GMT),
Dwight Corrin wrote:
>> Except if you change this behaviour, you'll next have somebody
>> complain because TB now sticks useless garbage in front of the
>> attachment name.
DC> well, yes (sigh). if we didn't ma
Hello RS,
On Sun, 15 May 2011 03:28:32 +0800 GMT (15/May/11, 2:28 AM +0700 GMT),
RS wrote:
>>> File names for both e-mail clients are as follows:
>>> TB: CCL_2011-253-71450_FELFRTM00019002_FREDERIK 07-05-2011.PDF
>>> TB!: 2011.PDF
>> We can replace slash character to minus characters too.
Hello RS,
On Sat, 14 May 2011 16:29:15 +0800 GMT (14/May/11, 15:29 PM +0700 GMT),
RS wrote:
R> Just for reference.
R> I checked Thunderbird behaviour.
R> File names for both e-mail clients are as follows:
R> TB: CCL_2011-253-71450_FELFRTM00019002_FREDERIK 07-05-2011.PDF
R> TB!: 2011.PDF
R> As
Hello Arjan,
On Mon, 09 May 2011 17:15:17 +0200 GMT (09/May/11, 22:15 PM +0700 GMT),
Arjan de Groot wrote:
>>I don't come here to engage in a completely fruitless debate on whose
>>is longer [no, not what you think; I meant breath].
AdG> I don't either. I just mentioned some examples of outdated
Hello Marck,
On Sun, 8 May 2011 18:35:07 +0100 GMT (09/May/11, 0:35 AM +0700 GMT),
Marck Pearlstone wrote:
MP> ...
MP>>> I think TB may have lost the ability to decode inline UUE in the
MP>>> re-write.
MP> ...
TOG>> What's your opinion on this? Should TB! continue to decode UUE? I for
TOG>> on
Hello Marck,
On Sun, 8 May 2011 18:08:59 +0100 GMT (09/May/11, 0:08 AM +0700 GMT),
Marck Pearlstone wrote:
MP> I think TB may have lost the ability to decode inline UUE in the
MP> re-write. It clearly still has a UUE decoder for use in the
MP> importer. As for why some can and some can't see the
Hello Marck,
On Sun, 8 May 2011 13:47:02 +0100 GMT (08/May/11, 19:47 PM +0700 GMT),
Marck Pearlstone wrote:
ADG>> For clarity: this also means TB! is not just simply importing messages
ADG>> but modifies them while importing. I am not quite sure if it should be
ADG>> allowed to do that.
MP> When
Hello Joe,
On Sat, 7 May 2011 07:18:55 -0400 GMT (07/May/11, 18:18 PM +0700 GMT),
Joe wrote:
J> If find it so hard to believe, that it has been almost two months
J> since the dreaded release of v5 and there is still no fix for major
J> basic functionally such as filters, virtual folders and hangs
601 - 700 of 2902 matches
Mail list logo
