Re: While it's quiet: thoughts on Help file, IMAP, Drafts folder

2005-12-18 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
On Sunday, 18 December 2005 at 16:37 Mary Bull wrote: Comments? You got it, Madame! :) -- Manuel, http://www.manuel-breitfeld.de Current beta is 3.63.14 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: While it's quiet: thoughts on Help file, IMAP, Drafts folder

2005-12-18 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
On Sunday, 18 December 2005 at 17:15 Mary Bull wrote: So could you please put a further supporting note at https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5441 ? TIA My pleasure. Wish you a nice Sunday. ;) -- Manuel, http://www.manuel-breitfeld.de

Re: About release

2005-11-01 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
On Tuesday, November 01, 2005 15:30 Alexander S. Kunz wrote: Sorry sorry sorry. Köstlich. ;-) -- Manuel, http://www.manuel-breitfeld.de Der Zufall ist das Pseudonym, das der liebe Gott wählt, wenn er inkognito bleiben will. -- Albert Schweitzer

Re: 3.62.09 is now available

2005-11-01 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
On Tuesday, November 01, 2005 19:48 Henk M. de Bruijn wrote: These last two betas are doing their best to spoil my pleasure of being a betatester :-( Welcome on board, you are a finaltester... -- Manuel, http://www.manuel-breitfeld.de

Re: About release

2005-10-29 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
On Saturday, October 29, 2005 05:14 PM Curtis wrote: - There are quite a lot ... a disturbing lot who still use v2 software because it's more stable for them. You're right. There are even people who use v1 and are satisfied. ;) Why? Works better for them. The later releases that contain

Re: About release

2005-10-29 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
On Saturday, October 29, 2005 08:32 PM, Peter Fjelsten wrote: Important point here. The fixed bug list is impressive - quite sure. But you, 9Val, have to admit that there is a huge amount of bugs which were introduced by fancy features and unicode. I'd say that unicode - although not used by

Re: IMAP Bugs Sales Opportunity

2005-10-03 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hello John Thomas, On Monday, 03 Oktober 2005 at 02:45, you wrote: I would like to go on record as saying that IMAP is much better with your settings, but still needs work. Yes, and that's indeed a curious situation. One really can't count how often this process of getting IMAP work better

Re: Part.ATT???

2005-08-05 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
On Friday, 05 August 2005 at 07:42, Peter Palmreuther wrote: So all TB! users, who don't write in English, should tell their customers not to name their documents with special characters? I see... That's not the point! C'mon, stop hounding. I'm not hounding, but I'll give my best to fit in

Re: Part.ATT???

2005-08-04 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hi Peter, On Thursday, 04 August 2005 at 10:41Peter Palmreuther wrote: What you say makes sense. So one person who sends me these .att files is using Apple Mail (2.622). So maybe it's a Mac thing? I'd say that's possible and reasonable. I can imagine the Apple mailer sending messages as RTF

Re: Part.ATT???

2005-08-04 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hi me, On Thursday, 04 August 2005 at 11:25 Manuel Breitfeld wrote: The author of this entry told me that the bug still exists, although Marek set it to resolved. I'm sorry, this was just a duplicate entry. The entry, which is currently open for opinions, is the following: ;) Filenames

Re: Part.ATT???

2005-08-04 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
On Thursday, 04 August 2005 at 13:45 Vili wrote: part.ATT means that it is part of a multipart attachment that cannot be decoded. Normally, OE used to send out this kind of attachments. There's no need to write attachments in quotation. As you can see in BT, TB! doesn't fully support RFC in

Re: Part.ATT???

2005-08-04 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
On Thursday, 04 August 2005 at 17:48 Vili wrote: Could you just send me the part of the mail source that shows the first some line attachments? I hope this one will behave like described and show some Part things. ;) I didn't test before, but I'm quite sure, that TB! won't decode it right -

Re: Part.ATT???

2005-08-04 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
On Thursday, 04 August 2005 at 21:34, Vili wrote: Yep, problem. Use English alphabet until fix :) So all TB! users, who don't write in English, should tell their customers not to name their documents with special characters? I see... -- Manuel, http://www.manuel-breitfeld.de

Re: Part.ATT???

2005-08-04 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
On Thursday, 04 August 2005 at 22:02, Vili wrote: So all TB! users, who don't write in English, should tell their customers not to name their documents with special characters? I see... I am Hungarian, so we have special characters, also... So this error hurts me, too. I tried to joke :))

Re: Part.ATT???

2005-08-04 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Sorry, very bad typo... ;) Since it doesn't hurt, I can joke about quite easily... ;) -- hurt /me/ as a Linux user. -- Manuel, http://www.manuel-breitfeld.de Current beta is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information:

Re: http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4904 [was Re: RFC Comments header can't be set]

2005-07-18 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
On Monday, 18 July 2005 at 13:28 Mary Bull wrote: I've double-checked: it's what it says. TB! did, however, swallow a space: 255 GHz. I think the space will stay in, this time, since I've reverted temporarily to using v. 3.0.2.10. I'll pay some thousand dollars and will arrive by airplane to

Re: http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4904 [was Re: RFC Comments header can't be set]

2005-07-18 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
On Monday, 18 July 2005 at 13:53, Mary Bull wrote: ...has to be 2.55 GHz, I think. :D With my nose within 2 inches of the screen, I see 2.55 GHz. LOL, that indeed made me laugh. Not your faulty writing of your computer's power... This was not the 4904 character-dropping bug. And I didn't

Re: http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4904 [was Re: RFC Comments header can't be set]

2005-07-18 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
On Monday, 18 Juli 2005 at 14:53, Mary Bull wrote: With my nose within 2 inches of the screen, I see 2.55 GHz. LOL, that indeed made me laugh. Not your faulty writing of your computer's power... Resolution is everything! :unreal2: Over here: 1680x1050 on a 17 - nice. ;-) No problem,

Re: F4 quoting of selected text is NOT working (was: Re: The Bat! 3.51.4 is now available)

2005-07-17 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
On Sunday, 17 July 2005 at 10:48 MAU wrote: Sending you a cup of coffee, if it's not too late to drink it where you are. :) It's morning here when I'm reading you, so I'll accept the coffee. It can't be too late for a cup of coffee. One simply can't live without coffee. ;-) PS: Me quoting

Re: http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/index.php?login=yes

2005-07-16 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
On Saturday, 16 July 2005 at 01:29 PM, Michael Mlinaric wrote: I'm getting Access Denied in the Beta page. Anyone else is getting the same? To who should I talk to? Yes, still the same for me. Did you try register again? Important: Do *not* use this link:

Re: The Bat! 3.51.3 is now available

2005-07-15 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
On Friday, 15 July 2005 at 09:40 AM, Marek Mikus wrote: [+] IMAP: colour groups support How does the internal structure look like? Does this mean I can set flags on the server an TB! will recognize them and apply them to the corresponding colour group? Thanks. -- Manuel,

Re: The Bat! 3.51.3 is now available

2005-07-14 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
On Friday, 15 July 2005 at 07:07 AM, Goncalo Farias wrote: The Bat! 3.51.3 is now available from: http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/ Authorization doesn't seem to be working (for me) ??? And me. I'm unable to login... Access Denied. http://www.ritlabs.com/download/the_bat/beta/tbb3513.rar

Re: Lycos mail plugin....

2005-07-11 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
On Monday, 11 July 2005 at 07:55 AM, Jay Walker wrote: Accordingly to your link, the basic package has HTTP/IMAP... You are right, Goncalo. No POP3 unless you pay, but HTTP/IMAP even for free. So what is HTTP/IMAP? Just a webinterface? -- Manuel, http://www.manuel-breitfeld.de

Re: Test

2005-07-10 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
On Sunday, 10 July 2005 at 10:39 PM, Wayne Howard wrote: Hello tbbeta, Hi Wayne, everything fine so far? ;-) -- Manuel, http://www.manuel-breitfeld.de Current beta is 3.51 | 'Using TBBETA' information:

Re: IMAP: Sorting Office

2005-07-08 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
On Friday, 08 July 2005 at 03:36 PM Stuart Cuddy wrote: I know it has been reported that Filtering is not working correctly with IMAP What do you mean? Filtering works quite okay, but we (the imap users) assume that some problems like no message loaded can be caused by filtering. It

Re: IMAP: Sorting Office

2005-07-08 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
On Friday, 08 July 2005 at 16:15 PM Stuart Cuddy wrote: You're right, concerning TB!. The IMAP protocol has something similar to color groups in TB!, the flags. Unfortunately, TB! isn't able to handle IMAP flags and so you aren't able to display the flags you can set on the server. Other

Re: 3.51

2005-07-07 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hello James, On Tuesday, 07 July 2005 at 08:04 AM you (James (Jay) Walker), also known as Avi, wrote: I'm familiar with it, but TB! doesn't use that system. Never has. Why should it now?? Perhaps to be more clear and hence more user-friendly. Perhaps to conform with a popular international

Re: 3.51

2005-07-07 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hi *Jay*, On Thursday, 07 July 2005 at 08:56 AM you (James (Jay) Walker) wrote: First of all, the name is Jay or, if you like, jaywalker. Not James - never James. That's too British for my current incarnation. Allright, Avi. :-P I'm feeling the same, the numbering system should be more

Re: 3.51

2005-07-07 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hello Tony, On Thursday, 07 July 2005 at 12:09 you (Tony Boom) wrote: Women get it, men suffer from it. Let me just say, that a short smile ran over my face, though my TV reports about London. :( -- Manuel, http://www.manuel-breitfeld.de

IMAP: AVs and freezing after Managing IMAP folders

2005-07-06 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hello All, I just opened TB! after a huge time period, since I'm currently mostly under a linux system. I read three messages in my tbbeta folder and answered one message to Vili in this list. Since TB! doesn't automatically recognize the changes which where done to the folder structure in the

Re: Mathematical Genius

2005-07-06 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hi Gary, On Wednesday, 06 July 2005 at 06:13 PM you (Gary) wrote: They were recalled by the sender... Ah, I see, well the next time can you tell him to press button B so the counter resets LOL I will. I have the same thing only with minus numbers.. e.g. -2 so I guess TB! is

Re: 3.51

2005-07-06 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hi Allie, On Wednesday, 06 July 2005, at 08:28 PM, you (Allie Martin) wrote: 3.10 is less than 3.9 3.1 is less than 3.9 Without having read the whole thread, I just want to point out, that it's not always that mathematical and therefore logical as you did point out. CVS's numbering system

Re: 3.51

2005-07-06 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hi Allie, On Wednesday, 06 Juli 2005 at 08:54 PM you (Allie Martin) wrote: TB!'s version numbering has never really followed the CVS numbering method. It has always been a mathematical progression. ...and should stick to this progression and even make it more understandable. You're right -

Re: IMAP: Fastmail missing messages

2005-07-06 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hi Stuart, On Wednesday, 06 July 2005 at 09:13 PM you (Stuart Cuddy) wrote: Does anyone who is using fastmail for The Bat lists feel they are missing messages? No, none. -- Manuel, http://www.manuel-breitfeld.de Current beta is 3.51

Re: IMAP: Fastmail missing messages

2005-07-06 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hello Allie, On Wednesday, 06 July 2005 at 10:16 PM you (Allie Martin) wrote: You know, since using the service, I'm yet to restore a single message from my spam folder and not many spam messages get past their filters. I'd say no more than 3 to 4 per day. I get close to 100 spam messages

Re: How Do I Repair My IMAP database?

2005-07-05 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hello 9Val, On Tuesday, 05 Juli 2005 at 03:19 PM you (9Val) wrote: An error occurred while reading the message base ...\Fastmail (IMAP)\55DBCDFF.TBB. Do you want to repair the message base now? This error message is a bit silly, perhaps we need to discuss these messages in IMAP

Re: IMAP No Message Loaded [was Re: 3.5.36]

2005-07-05 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hello Vili, On Tuesday, 05 Juli 2005 at 11:10 PM you (Vili) wrote: the IMAP server (which I think is unreliable, as I see so far...) The service Fastmail, which uses a Cyrus Server, isn't unreliable. To be fair, it's the most reliable server I've had so far. Moreover, it's the fastest also.

Re: IMAP No Message Loaded [was Re: 3.5.36]

2005-07-05 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hey Vili, yesterday (on 07/05/2005 at 23:53) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Take another look at Vili's message. It says he is suspicious of the CONNECTION not of the server. I would add that yes, the fastmail server seems very reliable and works very well here with TB!. Dwight is right, I

Re: IMAP: Move mails to folder

2005-07-02 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hi Raymund, On Saturday, 02 Juli 2005 at 4:30 PM you (Raymund Tump) wrote: This seems to work with small bunches at once, but that's a bit annoying if you have to copy 23,869 mails. Yes, no way here. Even with a fast connection at my university (~ 2 MB per second) it hangs. This appears on

Re: IMAP don'ts to get things working better

2005-07-02 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hi Allie, On Saturday, 02 Juli 2005 at 3:23 PM you (Allie Martin) wrote: - I avoid working with large mailboxes, i.e., no more than 4000 messages per mailbox. This may be even less if I end up having say 5 or more folders with a large amount of messages. That's right. The same applies for

Re: How Do I Repair My IMAP database?

2005-06-29 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hi Keith, On Wednesday, 29 June 2005 at 07:29 AM you (Keith Russell) wrote: I'm still on version 3.0.9.13. One reason that I have never upgraded this version and completely stopped using The Bat! some time ago is that it is unusable due to a constantly recurring error message. Since you are

Re: Status bar giving wrong connection type

2005-06-27 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hello Allie, Today, on Monday, 27 June 2005 at 02:48 AM your (Allie Martin) wrote: My main account is using IMAP over SSL. And yet the status bar says 'Plain' over towards the right. Are you sure that status bar indication is for connection type? I'm nearly sure this area shows Plain or

Re: 3.5.31 vs 3.5.30

2005-06-26 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hello Roger, On Sunday, 26 June 2005 at 16:59 you (Roger Phillips) wrote: Okay, makes it a bit clearer, but why is there a need to ask? They see if new bugs will be mentioned and get feedback to the fixed things - so thy have everything they need to decide on their own. Not necessarily!

Re: 3.5.31 vs 3.5.30

2005-06-26 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hello Vili, On Sunday, 26 June 2005 at 1:36 PM you (Vili) wrote: I am also trying to think on their financial support... Good release make people use TB!. If they hear that it does not work, Problems, lose mail... they wont buy it... Believe me :( I know many of them and it's often a bit

Re: Persistant bugs.

2005-06-26 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hello Tony, just now you (Tony Boom) wrote: Which of the presistent bugs are trivial to fix, could you please specify? I could tell you one that you seem unable to fix if you want? ;-) Who can't guess what you'll be telling him?! :D BTW: Did you look at the date-header? *Very* confusing

Re: 3.5.31 vs 3.5.30

2005-06-25 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hello Goncalo, On Saturday, 25 June 2005 at 17:15 you (Goncalo Farias) wrote: Is 3.5.31 generally better than 3.5.30? Should we update the MSI and the download page? I would say this is a rather odd question. It's good to be involved with the product but Ritlabs should know

Re: 3.5.31 vs 3.5.30

2005-06-25 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hello Mary, On Saturday, 25 June 2005 at 18:56 you (Mary Bull) wrote: I think Maxim means to be speaking in connection with the specific changes listed when 9Val made the announcement of the current (.31) beta, when he [Maxim] writes the words generally better. Okay, makes it a bit clearer,

Re: 3.5.31 vs 3.5.30

2005-06-25 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hello Mary, On Saturday, 25 June 2005, 07:58 PM, you (Mary Bull) wrote: Okay, makes it a bit clearer, but why is there a need to ask? They see if new bugs will be mentioned and get feedback to the fixed things - so thy have everything they need to decide on their own. Well, not quite

Re: 3.5.31 vs 3.5.30

2005-06-25 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hello Avi, On Saturday, 25 June 2005 at 9:33 PM you (Avi Yashar) wrote: Okay, makes it a bit clearer, but why is there a need to ask? They see if new bugs will be mentioned and get feedback to the fixed things - so thy have everything they need to decide on their own. Manuel, while

Re: 3.5.30

2005-06-22 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hello MAU, On Wednesday, 22 June 2005 at 08:47 you wrote: Now if only RL would sort out the painfully slow Message Finder with OTFE... ;-) You know what it takes, you have to complain about it on this list at least 100 times ;-) You seem to have a good day, haven't you?! ;) -- Manuel,

Re: 3.5.30

2005-06-21 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hello Maxim, On Tuesday, 21 June 2005 23:50 Maxim Masiutin wrote: Appearance of Connection Center: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4804 Windows Server 2003 We've just fixed the above bugs. But one of the bugs was a duplicate. Avi, Avi, Avi, Avi - read this?! ;-) -- Manuel,

Re: IMAP: Connect/Disconnect frequently required

2005-06-21 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hello Allie, On Wednesday, 22 June 2005 at 02:14 AM you, formally known as Allie Martin, wrote: I've tried it with the current functionality, but the result leaves a lot to be desired in terms of appearance. This is the *unfinished* customizer. Okay, toggle button/item would be nice, but

Re: POP3-IMAP and subject lines [was Re: Folder Maintenance (was: 3.5.29)]

2005-06-20 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hello Mary, On Monday, 20 June 2005 at 08:58 PM you ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote; I'm trying, though the same could be requested of POP3 issues. I tend to get inadvertently caught up in reading those as well. I'm not complaining. Yes. It would be nice if we could keep our subject lines

Re: NML?

2005-06-20 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hi Allie, On Monday, 20 June 2005 at 10:23 PM you ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) worte: I think this may have to do with my mailboxes not being particularly large YET!. :) This is the point. As long as the amount of messages per folder isn't higher than - let's say - 200, one has no problems. But

Re: NML?

2005-06-20 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hello Dwight, On Monday, 20 June 2005 at 10:52 PM you ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: I was wondering about multiple connections. I know there were some discussions about this a while back, but I was ignoring IMAP mail then since I didn't have it. Any suggestions? Just look in the connection

Re: 3.5.30

2005-06-19 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hello Sebastian, On Sunday 19 Juni 2005 23:16 you wrote as [EMAIL PROTECTED]: If the beta .26-.29 didn't start normally, please confirm that it now starts OK. 27-30 doesn't start. OTFE passwd mode. After password i have one AV an after OK cascading AVs. .26 works fine for me. Oh no. I

Re: AVs and crash on shutdown

2005-06-18 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hi Manuel, -- 17.06.2005 08:36 +0200: What steps did you make to try again? Now I got it again. Again after a few days of not using TB! and using it then for ~one minute. --- The Bat! --- Access violation at address . Read of address

Re: AVs and crash on shutdown

2005-06-17 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hi Charlene, -- 16.06.2005 23:05 +0200: I tried to reproduce, but hadn't had any luck. What steps did you make to try again? Opening, Shutting down. Opening, changing folders, shutting down. Opening, changing folders like crazy, viewing messages, aborting this, shutting down. Opening,

AVs and crash on shutdown

2005-06-16 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hi all, I just fired up TB! v3.5.26 to look if bat feels fine today. After reading ~four messages in my IMAP account I wanted to shutdown TB!. TB! felt angry and gave me the following two AVs: --- The Bat! --- Access violation at address 7564004B.

Re: Anti-spam activation

2005-06-15 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hi Ciprian, -- 15.06.2005 10:29 +0300: How can I activate spam filtering? I added Bayes Filter 2.0.2 in preferences You should download the latest 2.0.3 version: http://www.lkcc.org/achim -- Manuel, http://www.manuel-breitfeld.de

Re: OT: Missing references (Was: Re: Filtering issue)

2005-06-15 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hi Tony, -- 15.06.2005 08:49 +0100: This doesn't, you're right. Of course it didn't thread, I made sure of it for demonstration purposes. LOL :D -- Manuel, http://www.manuel-breitfeld.de Current beta is 3.5.26 | 'Using TBBETA'

Re: OT: Missing references (Was: Re: Filtering issue)

2005-06-15 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hi Tony, -- 15.06.2005 10:02 +0100: Of course it didn't thread, I made sure of it for demonstration purposes. LOL :D This threading problem The Bat has seems to be spreading. Poor Xav is having trouble with it now, he'll soon be in Boris's Tony List :) Yes, and poor Xav can't just

Re: Re[7]: Distributed AS IS

2005-06-15 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hi Allie, -- 15.06.2005 15:02 -0500: What needs to improve as well, is reliability of the current functionality across different setups and servers. It would seem that there are quite a few who would be happy with TB!'s current IMAP implementation if it would just work reliably. Many

Re: Re[7]: Distributed AS IS

2005-06-15 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hi Tony, -- 15.06.2005 20:55 +0100: Mulberry becomes nearly unusable. This is especially true with the IMAP inbox. This behavior does not appear on my laptop, however. It doesn't happen here either, it's perhaps one of *the* most stable programs I have on here. Have to confirm Tony's

Re: OT: Missing references (Was: Re: Filtering issue)

2005-06-14 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hi Boris, -- 14.06.2005 20:37 +0200: Or did you do already what I'm doing now - add Vili to the tony - filter. Just in case you really have this tony - filter. Tony has changed his provider and actually uses great Fastmail. All messages by Tony thread fine now. -- Manuel,

Re: 3.5.26 don't start

2005-06-14 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hi Maxim, -- 14.06.2005 23:37 +0300: If 3.5.26 don't start, could you please tell what version of props.dll do you have? Click right mouse button on props.dll and select version tab. Sorry, I didn't look up its version at the time TB! v3.5.26 won't start for me. In mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] on

Re: OT: Missing references (Was: Re: Filtering issue)

2005-06-14 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hi Boris, -- 14.06.2005 22:56 +0200: All messages by Tony thread fine now. Sure? mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This doesn't, you're right. Sent by *great* K-Mail - I'm really not that involved, I can comment things here. Everybody is free to delete messages, nobody needs to justify his

Re: Message multiplication using IMAP

2005-06-10 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hi Natasha, -- 10.06.2005 17:08 +1200: IIRC, someone posted to the list some time ago about messages sent via IMAP being reproduced many times. I only wish I could find the MID, but no luck so far. There were many messages that described this odd behavior. I myself wrote something about

Re: PGP

2005-06-09 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hi Stuart, -- 09.06.2005 09:00 +0100: Let me know how you get on? Here goes I can't find your key. I'll check it, as soon as I have your key. :) -- Manuel, http://www.manuel-breitfeld.de Current beta is 3.5.26 | 'Using

Re: PGP

2005-06-09 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hi Stuart, -- 09.06.2005 10:13 +0100: I can't find your key. I'll check it, as soon as I have your key. :) It should be on keyserver.pgp.com. You can also download it from http://www.cix.co.uk/~shemminga/Stuart_Hemming.asc I'll be happy to go over the fingerprint in PM if you want to.

Re: PGP

2005-06-09 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hi Stuart, -- 09.06.2005 11:48 +0100: I opted to reply to it and was pleasantly surprised to find that TB! had automagically selected 'Encrypt when Completed'. However, when I tried to send the message, the 'signing passphrase' dialog came up twice and then nothing happened. Did you trust

Re: X-Rogue?

2005-06-09 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hi Tony, -- 09.06.2005 16:55 +0100: Anyway, it works now. :-) Think I got it working with this Linux version as well? Yes, works. :) BTW - are under gnome? Why don't use evolution or is evolution good in IMAP? I'll set up a new system next week - Ubuntu, yeah. ;) Sorry, please don't

Re: X-Rogue?

2005-06-09 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hi Liz, -- 09.06.2005 17:38 +0100: Think I got it working with this Linux version as well? Linux version? ...of Mulberry. -- Manuel, http://www.manuel-breitfeld.de Current beta is 3.5.26 | 'Using TBBETA' information:

Re: Lost Ticker

2005-06-08 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hi Stuart, -- 08.06.2005 11:36 +0100: I seem to have lost my mail ticker. Did you check its position? Navigate to the following registry entry and look for Left and Top. HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\RIT\The Bat!\Ticker Perhaps these values are to high and the ticker is beside your screen.

3.5.26 - Parser module is invalid

2005-06-07 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hello all, I can't start The Bat! v3.5.26. My last installed version was v3.5.24 and this had no problems with starting. Some people wrote about this bug in v3.5.25, which I didn't test. I have a props.dll (MD5: 238fadd0c2e4cca726114e248e733319) in my directory, but nothing goes... :( I

Re: 3.5.26 - Parser module is invalid

2005-06-07 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hello Mary, just now (on 06/07/2005 at 19:01) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Should have elaborated here that Manuel should get the latest v. 3.5.25 off the RitLabs public download page, as they made a quiet fix of the parser error, right after Allie reported it, I think. And then Manuel could put

Re: Re[2]: 3.5.26 - Parser module is invalid

2005-06-07 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hi Tony, -- 07.06.2005 19:54 +0100: I think that the IMAP servers that are giving troubles should be identified and they should do some in-house testing before sending out this crippled betas. Mary I've even changed IMAP servers at my own cost in order to see if that improves TB's

Re: IMAP: Messages not expunged

2005-06-03 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hi Tony, -- 03.06.2005 20:52 +0100: Happens here, too. Mulberry or IMAPSize are my friends then. How's my threading by the way? As predicted in private,... you're the man, it works! ;) -- Manuel, http://www.manuel-breitfeld.de

Re: IMAP: Messages not expunged

2005-06-03 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hi Allie, -- 03.06.2005 15:07 -0500: As predicted in private,... you're the man, it works! ;) He can now continue his IMAP campaign with threaded comfort.. ;) Hehe, I think he will. ;) Another feature wish from my side: Please support labels! -- Manuel, http://www.manuel-breitfeld.de

Re: [Usability] The most un-obvious things

2005-06-02 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hi MAU, -- 02.06.2005 21:53 +0200: Remember. The photo it's easily fakeable. Who would like to look like Tony? Oh yeah!!! :D ;) -- Manuel, http://www.manuel-breitfeld.de Current beta is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBBETA' information:

Re: Re[2]: Compress/Expunge/Trash folders weirdness

2005-06-01 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hi Terry, -- 01.06.2005 08:09 +0100: For me too, except the trash folder. All sent mailing lists mails get deleted by a outgoing filter and my trash folder grows and grows. This is a known bug. Some time ago it seemed to be fixed, but now it's still/again there. I haven't experienced this

Re: [Usability] The most un-obvious things

2005-05-31 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hi Tony, -- 31.05.2005 19:21 +0100: Suggestions how this things should be done are welcome :-) I'd like an auto PGP verification notice in the header pane instead of having to click an icon and a separate window appear. Yes, I included this in my list to 9Val as well. :)

Re: Compress/Expunge/Trash folders weirdness

2005-05-31 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hi Allie and Terry, -- 31.05.2005 23:12 -0500: IMAP account, set to delete on server. Option to compress all folders on exit checked. Option to compress when switching between folders unchecked. On exit, folders aren't being compressed/expunged. That's a bummer. I compress on exiting

Re: [Usability] The most un-obvious things

2005-05-30 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hi 9Val, -- 30.05.2005 02:06 +0300: We'd like to hear your opinions about most un-obvious things you ever encountered using TB! - Lead the user through OTFE installation. It really isn't a good point, when one has to backup, erase, re-install and restore everything by hand. There

Re: The most un-obvious things

2005-05-30 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hi Liz, -- 30.05.2005 09:25 +0100: My brain maybe mush but what is OTFE? Sorry, On-The-Fly-Encryption in TB! Professional. -- Manuel, http://www.manuel-breitfeld.de Current beta is 3.5.21 | 'Using TBBETA' information:

Re: OT: Do you happen to know...

2005-05-29 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hi Mary, -- 29.05.2005 11:34 -0500: How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood? A woodchuck would chuck as much wood as a woodchuck could, if a woodchuck could chuck wood! Hard for me as a German. ;-) Something similar... Lesson 1: Three witches watch three

Re: OT: Do you happen to know...

2005-05-29 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hi Mary, -- 29.05.2005 14:05 -0500: She sells sea shells by the sea shore? Nice, I didn't know it. :) -- Manuel, http://www.manuel-breitfeld.de Current beta is 3.5.21 | 'Using TBBETA' information:

Re: two remaining bugs in the 3.5.17

2005-05-26 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hi Alexander, -- 26.05.2005 08:25 +0200: reading the subject of your message my first thought was optimist. :-) LOL!!! -- Manuel, http://www.manuel-breitfeld.de Current beta is 3.5.0.17 | 'Using TBBETA' information:

Re: 3.5.0.17 Black spaces in paking column

2005-05-26 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hi Alexander, -- 26.05.2005 09:20 +0200: I we had a changelog for .17 we would be able to see if something was done to the icon rendering since some people had problems with the icons being ugly on their systems. There was something done on icons for v3.5.0.14. Some icons (properties,

Re: 3.5.0.14

2005-05-25 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hi Clive, -- 25.05.2005 07:25 +0100: You'll be able to view and extract the files from MSI, RAR and ZIP archives. With plugins from nearly everything. ;) -- Manuel, http://www.manuel-breitfeld.de Current beta is (none) | 'Using

BUG: The Bat! hides some text in emails!

2005-05-25 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hi all, I just saw a strange behaviour of The Bat!. Each mail sent by Mulberry which has the following encoding gets cut off at the end by The Bat! in the message view. ~~ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii;

Re: 3.5.0.14

2005-05-25 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hi Tony, -- 25.05.2005 12:11 +0100: Try a trial of Total Commander from http://www.ghisler.com/ You'll be able to view and extract the files from MSI, RAR and ZIP archives. OK, got TC, how do I get it to extract files? Every time I click the msi file it tries to install. You have to

Re: 3.5.0.14

2005-05-25 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hi Clive, -- 25.05.2005 15:27 +0100: Then (this is from the installation file included with the plugin): Haven't looked at the plugin, since I've installed from the very beginning of TC on my machine. ;) But since TC v6.5 all plugins can install automatically when opening the archive and

Re: 3.5.0.14

2005-05-25 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hi Manuel, -- 25.05.2005 16:39 +0200: Oh damn, what are you writing? 1. Very slow. Marek has already answered and Clive has even replied to him. 2. Very bad english. I'm sorry. since I've installed from the very beginning of TC on my machine. ;) since I've installed TC on my machine from

Re: 3.5.0.14

2005-05-25 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hi Mary, -- 25.05.2005 09:58 -0500: Oh ..., what are you writing? Offensive (to me) expletive deleted. I'm sorry. Will work on it, sure. ;) 1. Very slow. Marek has already answered and Clive has even replied to him. 2. Very bad english. I'm sorry. Not at all. English with German word

Re: 3.5.0.14

2005-05-25 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hi Mary, -- 25.05.2005 10:22 -0500: Hmm, it's there with no answers. Yeah, talking on tbbeta is more fun! (The whisper of danger, the faint odor of approaching fish.) Great, great - laughed a lot. ;) But as I really don't like to have fish now, see the CC header... Yes, I think you

Re: 3.5.0.17

2005-05-25 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hi Maxim, -- 25.05.2005 19:37 +0300: Could you please try 3.5.0.17. It should fix the AVs of 3.5.0.16. A german user has some problems with the GUI since v3.5.0.16. He's on Win 2K with SP4 and did try both types of installation - rar and msi. I attached a screenshot. Any hints and/or

Re: 3.5.0.17

2005-05-25 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hi Alexander, -- 25.05.2005 19:30 +0200: I attached a screenshot. Any hints and/or ideas? Yes - I want that black theme! :-) Just kidding... You get it, Alex. You get. This is a bug in MacOSx Theme, which you all will experience. All other themes work fine, except the MAC theme.

Re: 3.5.0.17

2005-05-25 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hi Alexander, -- 25.05.2005 20:32 +0200: Not here but thats maybe because I'm on WinXP and you mentioned that user has the problem with W2k. Me and e.g. Miroslav are on XP - same problems. :/ -- Manuel, http://www.manuel-breitfeld.de

Re: IMAP Fine Tune?

2005-05-25 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hi Tony, -- 25.05.2005 19:48 +0100: In IMAP Fine tune is a tick box Compress Folders when switching to another folder Compress in TB! is Expunge in Mulberry. That should do as explanation. ;) TB! deletes all messages which are marked as deleted, when you switch to another folder. --

  1   2   3   >