-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I am concerned about the following from Oliver Stern to Syafril
Hermansyah:
OS I received some messages recently created with a version of
Outlook.
OS They contained one attachment each (an RTF-file) with the
content type
OS application/msword.
Hi ztrader,
On Sun, 17 Sep 2000 12:13:56 -0700GMT (18/09/2000, 03:13 +0800GMT),
ztrader wrote:
DH Problem with TB!: It is handled just as another file, if you double
DH click it, it does not do anything
z Thank heavens! I, for one, do NOT want TB to download and open/execute
z some unknown
Hello Graham,
Responding to your article on Monday, September 18, 2000 at 07:10:59 GMT
+0100 (which was 18/09/2000 13:10 GMT +0700 my Local Time) :
OS I received some messages recently created with a version of Outlook.
OS They contained one attachment each (an RTF-file) with the content
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciao Marck,
Sunday, September 17, 2000, 1:05:27 AM, you wrote:
Where we can download alfa-beta versions of TB 1.xx or 2.xx ?
(if it is possible ! ;-)
MDP -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
B I will need to register my copy of TB! soon. I'm
Hi Stefano,
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000 09:05:37 +0200GMT (18/09/2000, 15:05 +0800GMT),
Stefano Zamprogno wrote:
SZ Where we can download alfa-beta versions of TB 1.xx or 2.xx ?
SZ (if it is possible ! ;-)
TB 1.47/beta1 can be downloaded at ftp://ftp.ritlabs.com/pub/the_bat/beta
Also, you'd better
Hello Mark R Harding,
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000 02:20:33 +0100 GMT your local time,
which was Monday, September 18, 2000, 02:20:33 (GMT+0100) (BST) my local time,
Mark R Harding wrote:
MRH My only thought against the above would be if a ban were also placed
MRH on specific IP addresses if the banned
Hello Stefano Zamprogno,
Responding to your article on Monday, September 18, 2000 at 09:05:37 GMT
+0200 (which was 18/09/2000 14:05 GMT +0700 my Local Time) :
SZ Where we can download alfa-beta versions of TB 1.xx or 2.xx ?
SZ (if it is possible ! ;-)
Look here
Hi Jamie,
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000 08:18:25 +0100GMT (18/09/2000, 15:18 +0800GMT),
Jamie Dainton wrote:
JD Such as a different dial up. I've sat down and considered this before,
JD I can't think of any feasible way of permanently preventing someone
JD from joining.
And I can't think of a feasible
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 18 Sep 00, at 13:42, Syafril Hermansyah wrote:
I just trying sending to myself RTF message using Outlook2000,
either direct to e-mail address or through the list, I got the
winmail.dat attachment as expected.
So I guess
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciao Thomas,
Monday, September 18, 2000, 9:19:54 AM, you wrote:
TF Also, you'd better join the TBBETA discussion list in order to
discuss
TF beta issues. Do this by clicking on this link:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks !
TF Have fun, and don't
Hello Östen Häggmark,
On Sat, 16 Sep 2000 17:22:58 +0200 GMT your local time,
which was Saturday, September 16, 2000, 16:22:58 (GMT+0100) (BST) my local time,
Östen Häggmark wrote:
ÖH The hackers will hack in any case. The people who is willing to pay
ÖH should be treated in a honest way
As
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Graham,
Responding to your article on Monday, September 18, 2000 at 08:58:44 GMT
+0100 (which was 18/09/2000 14:58 GMT +0700 my Local Time) :
I just trying sending to myself RTF message using Outlook2000,
either direct to e-mail
Hello Bat lovers,
I tried to sign one message (by checking sign when completed) but it says:
1. No signing certificate for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2. No valid signing certificates. Cannot sign the message using S/MIME
When I uncheck S/MIME option everything goes ok.
I think I didn't see this option
Hello Syafril,
Monday, September 18, 2000, 11:16:03 AM, you wrote:
I just trying some combination (RTF + MIME), (RTF+QP), use Word as
Email Editor, but no problem.
IIRC, I got such problem when I testing Trend Micro E-mail Firewall
long time ago, that's why I was asking any FireWall
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Stefano,
On 18 September 2000 at 10:10:31 GMT +0200 (which was 09:10 where I
live) Stefano Zamprogno wrote and made these points on the subject
of "Registration and Version 2":
TF Also, you'd better join the TBBETA discussion list in order to
SZ
Hello everyone,
Even if the Bat is a positive experience, I have to say that the
number of questions I would like to put to the list is gathering
up. :-) But I will try and restrain myself to a couple of small
ones connected to the actual browsing of messages. If anyone will
find the time to
This message: 18/09/2000 10:58 GMT.
Hello Susanne,
A reminder of what Susanne ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) typed on:
18 September 2000 at 18:14:53 GMT -0700
S My main problem with the Bat at this point is that my OE messages
S don't transfer over very well.
Why not forward them all to yourself?
Hello A.,
Sunday, September 17, 2000, 2:26:16 PM, you wrote:
KE so i just hide it. If there was a way to read the ticker, (is it a
KE window with scrolling text or what?) i'd consider using it, but as
KE it is now i'm glad i can hide it.
ACM Hehe. But remember that the tickers text
On Sunday, September 17, 2000, 11:12:31 PM, you wrote:
TF Wait a minute. Whether I get a link sent to me whcih points to a file
TF or I get the file as an email attachment, is the same security risk:
TF either I click on it or not.
I thought you were advocating sending a 'hollow' message with
Hi Östen,
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000 12:34:59 +0200GMT (18/09/2000, 18:34 +0800GMT),
Östen Häggmark wrote:
ÖH 1. When I delete a thread, the "cursor" in the message pane
ÖH jumps up from where ever I am to the first message/thread that
ÖH is shown.
ÖH Is this the way it should be?
No, it's a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000 11:40:29 +0200, Krister Ekstrom wrote:
ACM Hehe. But remember that the tickers text properties is
ACM configurable. You can choose whatever font and size to use, even a
ACM variable width font. ;-))
KE But i don't think that's
Hi ztrader,
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000 03:59:23 -0700GMT (18/09/2000, 18:59 +0800GMT),
ztrader wrote:
TF No, the link idea is good. I have never seen it work, but I like it
TF and see no special security reasons to forbid it.
z As long as it is not opened/executed automatically.
Absolutely agree.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciao Marck,
Monday, September 18, 2000, 12:30:09 PM, you wrote:
Ok, i have disabled it, thanks !
MDP This bad message text wrapping is the result of using PGP's message
MDP wrap with TB. You will achieve the best results by turning PGP's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciao Vladimir,
Monday, September 18, 2000, 11:49:59 AM, you wrote:
The same here !
VM I tried to sign one message (by checking sign when completed) but it says:
VM 1. No signing certificate for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VM 2. No valid signing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
No matter how I try, I cannot get the function TOOLS/PRIVACY/CHOOSE
PGP VERSION/2.6.3 executable to work.
At first I thought it was because I was using PGP 2.6.3ckt, so I
changed back to PGP 2.6.3ai.
I have PGP 6.5.3 on my computer, too, and I
Hello all,
Monday, September 18, 2000, Vladimir Mincev wrote:
I tried to sign one message (by checking sign when completed) but it says:
1. No signing certificate for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2. No valid signing certificates. Cannot sign the message using S/MIME
When I uncheck S/MIME option
A new question. I'm afraid I'll have some more as
time passes.
In my setup of TB, I use the Full-width preview
pane: mailboxes on the left, incoming mail on the
right, no preview of seperate messages; due to the
amount of mailboxes and mail in them, I need the
full space available.
This means
Hello Karin,
Monday, September 18, 2000, 2:37:12 PM, you wrote:
This means that when reading mail I have to double-click individual
messages in order to be able to read them, which is fine with me.
The only thing that I miss is the option from _within_ a message to
delete it, so that I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciao Marek,
Monday, September 18, 2000, 2:31:43 PM, you wrote:
I tried to sign one message (by checking sign when completed) but it says:
1. No signing certificate for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2. No valid signing certificates. Cannot sign the message
On 18-09-2000 at 14:53, Oliver Sturm kindly wrote:
Hello Karin, Monday, September 18, 2000, 2:37:12 PM, you wrote:
This means that when reading mail I have to double-click individual
messages in order to be able to read them, which is fine with me.
The only thing that I miss is the option
Hallo Karin,
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000 14:37:12 +0200 GMT (18/09/2000, 20:37 +0800 GMT),
Karin Spaink wrote:
KS The only
KS thing that I miss is the option from _within_ a
KS message to delete it, so that I automatically
KS navigate to the next unread message in the thread.
KS Is this possible?
Hello Karin Spaink,
Responding to your article on Monday, September 18, 2000 at 14:37:12 GMT
+0200 (which was 18/09/2000 19:37 GMT +0700 my Local Time) :
KS This means that when reading mail I have to double-click individual
KS messages in order to be able to read them, which is fine with
Hello Oliver Sturm,
Responding to your article on Monday, September 18, 2000 at 12:25:02 GMT
+0200 (which was 18/09/2000 17:25 GMT +0700 my Local Time) :
OS There's no firewall anti-virus solution in use. The mails in question
OS can be viewed if I use the "dispatch on server" window and it can
At 20:49 18-09-2000 +0700, Syafril Hermansyah kindly wrote:
Hello Karin Spaink,
KS This means that when reading mail I have to double-click individual
KS messages in order to be able to read them, which is fine with me.
KS The only thing that I miss is the option from _within_ a message
At 21:33 18-09-2000 +0800, Thomas Fernandez kindly wrote:
KS The only
KS thing that I miss is the option from _within_ a
KS message to delete it, so that I automatically
KS navigate to the next unread message in the thread.
KS Is this possible?
Have you tried hitting the del key?
Yes,
Morning A. Curtis Martin,
PS// Finished all the DiabloII stages? ;-b
By far not. I just look in the list when I need a little frustration
break (does occur when your level 45 Hardcore Sorceress gets killed
by Diablo's red beam). I will probably not be a frequent poster
during the next time
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
There's an option in the account dialog (options) that lets you turn off
S/MIME by default. Now, how I would actually *use* S/MIME is beyond me.
Any takers on that one?
- --
Herb Warren
Using The Bat! 1.46c
on: Windows NT 4.0
Build 1381
On Sunday, September 17, 2000, 1:08:42 PM, Susanne wrote:
I may try reinstalling. Had problems importing my OE5 messages. A
lot of them came through without any subject line, were cut off
halfway or were completely empty. Is this a common problem?
Sorry if I'm stating the obvious: have you
Hallo Karin,
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000 15:57:08 +0200 GMT (18/09/2000, 21:57 +0800 GMT),
Karin Spaink wrote:
KS KS The only
KS KS thing that I miss is the option from _within_ a
KS KS message to delete it, so that I automatically
KS KS navigate to the next unread message in the thread.
KS KS Is
Hello Mark,
Monday, September 18, 2000, 3:20:33 AM, you wrote:
MRH My only thought against the above would be if a ban were also placed
MRH on specific IP addresses if the banned party were known to have static
MRH addresses that identified them uniquely and even then it wouldn't be
MRH too
Hello Syafril,
Monday, September 18, 2000, 3:37:52 PM, you wrote:
I am curios, in all of my test here, it always have message header :
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
while your sample message not.
This cause TB! can not interpretation well, and fail to decode.
No, the mails
Hello Karin,
The quotes in your last two messages start in column 2.
Starting them in the first column lets The Bat! color the quotation
which makes the posting easier to read.
Just a suggestion 8-)
--
Best regards,
Istvn
Using The Bat! v1.46 Beta/3 on Windows 98 v4.10
Build 1998
--
Hello The Bat! users,
Susanne wrote on 9/18/2000, 4:00 AM
S It seems really easy. I didn't have to convert the messages to any
S other format. But at least 50% come through empty, cut off in the
S middle and with no sender, subject line or date.
Try to compact OE's folders before importing to
ÖH 1. When I delete a thread, the "cursor" in the message
ÖH pane jumps up from where ever I am to the first
ÖH message/thread that is shown. Is this the way it should be?
TF No, it's a bug qualified as an "annoyance" earlier today by two
TF members of this list.
Oh. Sorry, I didn't see
Hallo Östen,
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000 18:41:19 +0200 GMT (19/09/2000, 00:41 +0800 GMT),
Östen Häggmark wrote:
ÖH Oh. Sorry, I didn't see that. (In fact I still can't see
ÖH it. Which thread is it?)
Now I have to say sorry: it was not on this list, but on the TBBETA
list. The thread was called
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Thomas!
Monday, September 18, 2000, 12:57:56 PM, you wrote:
ÖH 1. When I delete a thread, the "cursor" in the message pane
ÖH jumps up from where ever I am to the first message/thread that
ÖH is shown.
ÖH Is this the way it should be?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello ztrader!
Monday, September 18, 2000, 12:59:23 PM, you wrote:
I thought you were advocating sending a 'hollow' message with only a
link, then TB AUTOMATICALLY gets the content and opens/executes it
with no operator intervention. This would
- Original Message -
From: SyP [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Try to compact OE's folders before importing to TB.
Hi SyP,
thanks for the hint. It's helped quite a bit.
Susanne
--
--
View the TBUDL archive at
I hope the TBUDL list server isn't going to insert lots of funny stuff
in the following text again...
You are subscribed as : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[ attachment has been remove by MDaemon ]
Now this is getting always better. Now that list server killed at
least half of my message!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000 13:25:38 +0100, Graham wrote:
G No matter how I try, I cannot get the function TOOLS/PRIVACY/CHOOSE
G PGP VERSION/2.6.3 executable to work.
G At first I thought it was because I was using PGP 2.6.3ckt, so I
G changed back to PGP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000 19:25:47 +0200, Dierk Haasis wrote:
No, it's a bug qualified as an "annoyance" earlier today by two
members of this list.
DHReally? I always liked this, since I can start from the beginning
DH(oldest messages/threads
- Original Message -
From: Ming-Li [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry if I'm stating the obvious: have you compress the folders in
OE before trying to import them into TB?
Sometimes the obvious is easily overlooked g. I thought I had
OE set to compact in the background, but alas, I hadn't.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000 16:01:26 +0200, Karin Spaink wrote:
KS While you read individual message, active "message list" from view
KS menu.
KS Yes !! That's the one. Thank you a lot.
Also note Karin, that the message list in the folder view works
Hi Syafril,
What is this? which is suddenly appearing on most of my mail from
TBUDL
[ attachment has been remove by MDaemon ]
Is it your server or mine?
--
Mark Aston mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gunfleet.com
http://www.gunfleet.com/LinuxGuide
Using The
On Monday, September 18, 2000 at 7:21:46 PM you wrote:
Yet another followup: I have solved the question whose fault the
problem is... it's in fact TB. Here's a snippet from the paragraph on
the filename parameter from RFC 2183 about "Content-Disposition":
On Monday, September 18, 2000, 10:03:59 AM, you wrote:
DH But, it can only work when sender *and* receiver
DH have access to the used hard drive (so both can open the file) -
Sorry to be one of the "illiterate", but I've never used this. Always
good to know more, though, so I am trying to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This message: 18/09/2000 19:06 GMT.
Hello Arthur,
A reminder of what Arthur ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) typed on:
18 September 2000 at 10:11:09 GMT -0400
AW Now, how I would actually *use* S/MIME is beyond me.
AW Any takers on that one?
You
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000 10:11:09 -0400, Arthur Warren wrote:
AW There's an option in the account dialog (options) that lets you turn
AW off S/MIME by default. Now, how I would actually *use* S/MIME is
AW beyond me.
AW Any takers on that one?
It's a
I collect mail from the same account on two machines - at home and at
work - and need to have all mails on both machines.
Can i set up TB! to delete a mail from the server when it's been
downloaded on both machines and to keep it when it's only received on
one machine`?
I know Eudora
Hello A,
Monday, September 18, 2000, 10:50:19 AM, you wrote:
ACM Also note Karin, that the message list in the folder view works
ACM independently of the message list view in the main TB! window. The
ACM folder view window works with it's own message list as well. This is why
ACM you thought
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000 20:56:51 +0200, Jarle Hammen Knudsen wrote:
JHK Can i set up TB! to delete a mail from the server when it's been
JHK downloaded on both machines and to keep it when it's only received on
JHK one machine`?
Yes. For the
Dears,
I still have a number of questions, given below in no
specific order. I hope that you will be able to help me out.
Meanwhile, I've got PGP working within TB (nice that a reply
to a pgp'ed mail is automaticaally decrypted itself).
Another step forwards.
1. Before I made a totally new
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000 14:18:06 -0500, A . Curtis Martin wrote:
JHK I know Eudora can do this. When retrieving a new mail it is flagged as
JHK read on the server and it wont be deleted by that machine.
ACM TB! does a similar thing. It keeps a log of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000 11:59:56 -0700, David Tod Sigafoos wrote:
DTS Hmmm .. so how do you make it so the 'folder viewer' works the same as
DTS the main tb! window?
You have to manually configure it to do so. Another twist of
configurability is that
Hello Susanne,
You wrote on 9/18/2000, 7:38 PM
Susanne thanks for the hint. It's helped quite a bit.
You're most welcome. :)
--
Cheers, SyP
God made the world in six days, and was arrested on the seventh.
--
--
View the TBUDL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000 21:22:48 +0200, Karin Spaink wrote:
I'll have a go with some of these questions. :_0
KS 1. Before I made a totally new private address book, I had
KS already created two nicknames. I can't seem to find them
KS anywhere, but they
Hi Mark,
On Monday 18/09/2000 at 18:52, you wrote:
What is this? which is suddenly appearing on most of my mail from
TBUDL
[ attachment has been remove by MDaemon ]
Is it your server or mine?
MDaemon is a *NIX mail system, so I'm guessing it's theirs.
Do you include a VCard with all your
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000 21:18:18 +0100, Deryk Lister wrote:
[ attachment has been remove by MDaemon ]
Is it your server or mine?
That's the dutaint server.
DL MDaemon is a *NIX mail system,
Actually there's a windows version available. :-)
See
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Graham,
On Monday, September 18, 2000, 3:02 PM, you wrote in part about "THE
BAT and PGP 2.6.3 executable":
G Willdo. But if anybody out there is an original PGP user and had
G no problems, could they help?
G After all, if TB explicitly states
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Karin,
On 18 September 2000 at 21:22:48 GMT +0200 (which was 20:22 where I
live) Karin Spaink wrote and made these points on the subject
of "Questions (I'm still too new a user)":
KS 1. Before I made a totally new private address book, I had
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000 21:20:18 +0100, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
MDP I think you have your folder map wrong. From the numbers you have
MDP quoted I would say it looks more like this:
MDP inbox 0 (7) 1 (11)
MDP- mailinglists 0
Morning Karin Spaink,
3. Is there any way to manually edit received messages (.e.g the
Pencil function in Eudora, editing the inbox.
Of course you can move to the outbox for edit as Allie suggested. But
maybe that's not the ideal solution. It would depend on why you want
to edit a received
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000 15:54:08 -0500, Chuck Mattsen wrote:
ACM I'll have a go with some of these questions. :_0
CM Which is the symbol for what? Nose out of joint? Got in a fight
CM yesterday? Bad plastic surgery victim?
ROTFL!! It looks more
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi A,
On 18 September 2000 at 15:26:11 GMT -0500 (which was 21:26 where I
live) A . Curtis Martin wrote and made these points on the subject
of "attachment removed":
ACM That's the dutaint server.
DL MDaemon is a *NIX mail system,
ACM Actually
Monday, September 18, 2000, 9:18:06 PM, you wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000 20:56:51 +0200, Jarle Hammen Knudsen wrote:
JHK Can i set up TB! to delete a mail from the server when it's been
JHK downloaded on both machines and to keep it when
Monday, September 18, 2000, 8:56:51 PM, you wrote:
[ attachment has been remove by MDaemon ]
I certainly did not post with any attachments.
--
Jarle H. Knudsen
--
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- - - Original message from: Karin Spaink
6. Folder tree: I can't fully gather how the numbers after
the folder name mean. Example, currently that tree contains,
amongst others:
inbox0 (7) 1 (11)
Monday, September 18, 2000, 4:03:55 PM, Jast, wrote:
J Other than that, possibly you might want to use the memo function for
J random thoughts you want to add to a mail?
What "memo function"
--
Joe Finocchiaro
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thanks Allie/Curtis - it was the import thing that I was missing.
Foolishly, I was still looking under "Privacy". However, having seen the
result of S/MIME, I don't think that I'll be using it right off.
And now that I think about it a bit, I do
Hello A,
On Monday, September 18, 2000 at 13:11:57 GMT -0500 (which was 11:11 AM
where I live) witnesses say A . Curtis Martin typed:
Import the keys
and you are set to send S/MIME signed messages.
Just a quick question, what was the official policy on S/MIME signed
messages on TBUDL? I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000 23:27:16 +0200, Jarle Hammen Knudsen wrote:
JHK Yes, this is how I have it configured now. But if I set up the office
JHK machine to leave messages and the home machine to delete them I have a
JHK problem if I retrieve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000 16:39:43 -0500, Joe Finocchiaro wrote:
J Other than that, possibly you might want to use the memo function
J for random thoughts you want to add to a mail?
JF What "memo function"
To invoke the memo editor, hit CTRLSHIFTI
Hello Jarle,
On Monday, September 18, 2000 at 23:27:16 GMT +0200 (which was 2:27 PM
where I live) witnesses say Jarle Hammen Knudsen typed:
Yes, this is how I have it configured now. But if I set up the office
machine to leave messages and the home machine to delete them I have a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000 17:52:08 -0400, Arthur Warren wrote:
AW And now that I think about it a bit, I do remember quite a bit of
AW discussion about signing mail, and that S/MIME mightn't be allowed on
AW this list due to its encoding size.
Yes. For
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000 14:58:30 -0700, Januk Aggarwal wrote:
Import the keys and you are set to send S/MIME signed messages.
JA Just a quick question, what was the official policy on S/MIME signed
JA messages on TBUDL? I remember a very big debate
Hello ztrader,
On Monday, September 18, 2000 at 11:04:52 GMT -0700 (which was 11:04 AM
where I live) witnesses say ztrader typed:
I'm a bit unclear about 'access'. Are you saying that the file is not
sent over the net as a file, but opened as though it were a regular
local net file?
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000 15:08:29 -0500, A . Curtis Martin wrote:
ACM Otherwise, you'll have to export the message, edit it and then import
ACM it. The received time will be changed to the time of importation but the
ACM headers will not be changed.
In the past, i have several times complained about
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Joe,
On 18 September 2000 at 16:39:43 GMT -0500 (which was 22:39 where I
live) Joe Finocchiaro wrote and made these points on the subject
of "Questions (I'm still too new a user)":
JF Monday, September 18, 2000, 4:03:55 PM, Jast, wrote:
J
This message: 18/09/2000 22:30 GMT.
Hello Deryk,
A reminder of what Deryk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) typed on:
18 September 2000 at 21:18:18 GMT +0100
DL MDaemon is a *NIX mail system, so I'm guessing it's theirs.
DL Do you include a VCard with all your posts? The mailing list probably
DL
On 18-09-2000 at 22:20, Marck D. Pearlstone kindly wrote:
Karin Spaink wrote:
KS 1. Before I made a totally new private address book, I had already
KS created two nicknames. I can't seem to find them anywhere, but
KS they still work - does anybody have a clue as to where they might
KS have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 19 Sep 2000 00:30:18 +0200, Peter Steiner wrote:
PS In the past, i have several times complained about the received time
PS problem. Now that it is solved, but has a vivid life as a legend, i
PS owe to RITlabs to point out that it is really
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000 17:18:15 -0500, A . Curtis Martin wrote:
ACM The decision was that subscribers not S/MIME sign their messages because
ACM of the increase in message size involved when the signature is included.
ACM The 3k per message seems small
Monday, September 18, 2000, 5:34:31 PM, Marck D. Pearlstone, wrote:
[...]
J Other than that, possibly you might want to use the memo function for
J random thoughts you want to add to a mail?
JF What "memo function"
MDP Hey Joe - welcome back to the neighbourhood :-).
It's nice to be
On 18-09-2000 at 22:08, A. Curtis Martin kindly wrote:
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000 21:22:48 +0200, Karin Spaink wrote:
KS 4. Mailbox management: I miss a drag and drop option that will allow
KS you to move the mailbox (properties and all) to a different place in
KS the mailbox structure.
Are you
Monday, September 18, 2000, 5:02:43 PM, A. Curtis Martin, wrote:
[...]
ACM To invoke the memo editor, hit CTRLSHIFTI or go to View - Memo
ACM Auto-view. You may associate a memo with each message and there is a
ACM column that you may add to your message list to view the memos. You may
ACM also
On 18-09-2000 at 19:50, A. Curtis Martin kindly wrote:
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000 16:01:26 +0200, Karin Spaink wrote:
KS While you read individual message, active "message list" from view
KS menu.
KS Yes !! That's the one. Thank you a lot.
Note also, the navigational keys on the view folder
DL MDaemon is a *NIX mail system, so I'm guessing it's theirs.
DL Do you include a VCard with all your posts? The mailing list probably
DL deletes them automatically.
I've noticed this as well. At first I thought it was only present on
PGP signed mail but it appears not.
It also
On Monday, September 18, 2000, 4:10:19 PM, you wrote:
ACM You may associate a memo with each message and there is a
ACM column that you may add to your message list to view the memos.
Where are these stored? If I archive messages, does this go along with
each message?
ztrader
--
Is there a way to add a header line to mail that is read with TB? I
save some mail, and would like to distinguish mail read with TB from
mail read another way. The mail of both kinds would be archived
together. Something like:
X-readby: TheBat
Thanks,
ztrader
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Deryk,
On 19 September 2000 at 00:16:00 GMT +0100 (which was 00:16 where I
live) Deryk Lister wrote and made these points on the subject
of "attachment removed":
DL MDaemon is a *NIX mail system, so I'm guessing it's theirs.
DL Do you include a
1 - 100 of 148 matches
Mail list logo
