Hi Thomas,
On Fri, 13 Apr 2001, at 12:41:30 +0800 you wrote:
The attachment has an ".shtml" extension and the content-type
is text/html.
On my machine, the attachment is shown as "message.html", not
.shtml and its content type is text/html. But you are right, I
can't delete the attachment
Hi Lars,
On Fri, 13 Apr 2001 08:27:25 +0200GMT (13/04/2001, 14:27 +0800GMT),
Lars Geiger wrote:
The attachment has an ".shtml" extension and the content-type
is text/html.
LG On my machine, the attachment is shown as "message.html", not
LG .shtml
I checked again, and it is "message.shtml"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hail sd
On 12 April 2001 at 17:56:29 -0500 (which was 23:56 where I live) sd ha
scritto made the following points
I have a folder, into which all my mail from a mailing list goes to.
When I reply to a message, instead of getting the email address
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear Lars
On 13 April 2001 at 08:27:25 +0200 (which was 07:27 where I live) Lars
Geiger might have written
The attachment has an ".shtml" extension and the content-type is
text/html.
On my machine, the attachment is shown as "message.html", not
Hello Marck,
Friday, April 13, 2001, 1:14:17 AM, you wrote:
MDP responsibly (everyone here knows about my aversion to folder level
MDP templates - heck, I belong to a couple of lists that need this done
MDP and I can't bring myself to do it).
I am a newcomer to the list and to Bat, and
On April 13, 2001, at 12:01:59 AM, Ottar Grimstad wrote:
You just taught me about Address Book templates. I had not discovered
these. To have my reply template here for a well behaved list seems OK,
but the conveniance of just highlighting the folder and start a new
message will be lost if I
1. Is there a way to delete messages without having them going to the
Trash folder (then you have to purge and compress the trash folder)?
2. I have a mailing list that is cumulating over 4,000 messages. I
decided to delete them since I don't have time to read them. It took
over 10 minutes
Hello
Best regards
--
*** Michal Kozusznik *** MaXyM/PicSaintLoup ***
*** music *** Taekwon-do ***
*** [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
*** http://mops.uci.agh.edu.pl/~mxm_crd ***
--
__
Archives :
Hi David,
On Fri, 13 Apr 2001 07:40:18 +0100GMT (13/04/2001, 14:40 +0800GMT),
David Elliott wrote:
DE Are these differences caused by the different mail servers ?
I don't think that the mail server can change the name of an
attachment.
DE What I do like is the last lines added by the list it
Hi Lars,
On Fri, 13 Apr 2001 08:27:25 +0200GMT (13/04/2001, 14:27 +0800GMT),
Lars Geiger wrote:
The attachment has an ".shtml" extension and the content-type
is text/html.
LG On my machine, the attachment is shown as "message.html", not
LG .shtml and its content type is text/html. But you
Hi Thomas,
On Fri, 13 Apr 2001, at 15:38:36 +0800 you wrote:
DE Are these differences caused by the different mail servers?
I don't think that the mail server can change the name of an
attachment.
I just exported that particular message and had a closer look at
the headers and the message
Hi Thomas,
On Fri, 13 Apr 2001, at 16:16:25 +0800 you wrote:
Has anybody ever been able to delete the HTML part of a message
with a content-type text/html?
I think that a message with content type text/html contains
*only* a html part and that's the reason why TB! is unable to
delete that
Hi Lars,
On Fri, 13 Apr 2001 10:28:35 +0200GMT (13/04/2001, 16:28 +0800GMT),
Lars Geiger wrote:
LG I think that a message with content type text/html contains
LG *only* a html part
Correct.
LG and that's the reason why TB! is unable to delete that part.
TB should keep the text it generates,
Hi Lars,
On Fri, 13 Apr 2001 10:23:57 +0200GMT (13/04/2001, 16:23 +0800GMT),
Lars Geiger wrote:
LG The second problem is that there is no plain text part, only the
LG html part. So obviously that's the reason why TB! refused to
LG delete the html part, as there would have been nothing left to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear Lars
On 13 April 2001 at 10:23:57 +0200 (which was 09:23 where I live) Lars
Geiger wrote or so historians believe
First of all, there is no name for the attachment anywhere.
True.
That reminds me of a thread some time ago about the
On 2001-04-13 at 9:52 am Thomas wrote:
TB generates a text part when you view the message with HTML autview
disabled.
It was agreed quite some time ago that it should be possible to delete
the HTML attachments, so that TB keeps only the text part it has
generated. I was of the opinion that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi mark,
On 13 April 2001 at 21:31:04 -0700 (which was 05:31 where I live)
mark nathanson wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and made these
points:
Please do not write to the list in HTML. It is against the list rules
and many of the members here do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Thomas,
On 13 April 2001 at 16:16:25 +0800 (which was 09:16 where I live)
Thomas wrote to Lars Geiger on TBUDL and made these points:
LG On my machine, the attachment is shown as "message.html", not
LG .shtml and its content type is text/html.
Hi David,
On Fri, 13 Apr 2001, at 09:58:10 +0100 you wrote:
Interesting idea. It looks like it based on the set up of each
receiving computer
It seems so.
Have a look at Marck's bug report:
http://www.mail-archive.com/tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com/msg23001.html
And this is the thread where the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi net5zero,
On 13 April 2001 at 03:11:54 -0400 (which was 08:11 where I live)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote to TBUDL and made these points:
nnn 1. Is there a way to delete messages without having them going to
nnn the Trash folder (then you have to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Michal,
On 13 April 2001 at 13:07:51 +0200 (which was 12:07 where I live)
Michal Kozusznik wrote to Michal Kozusznik and made these points:
MK Due to this, other users will not be able to read this mails from
MK another places (ie. from home)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Michal,
On 12 April 2001 at 22:59:50 +0200 (which was 21:59 where I live)
Michal Kozusznik wrote to Ming-Li and made these points:
MK ... But if the TB! admin acc is created under "name1" Win account,
MK it can't be used under "name2" win
Hi.
I have a problem with periodical checking mail.
It's does not work. Please, tel me how can I fix this bug without
erasing account.cfg file from the mail box dir.
Best regards
Dmitry Polunin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Work: 8(095)534-0071
Home: 8(095)536-3786 ICQ 37099779
Voice mail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Dmitry,
On 13 April 2001 at 15:52:03 +0400 (which was 12:52 where I live)
Dmitry S. Polunin wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and made these
points:
DSP I have a problem with periodical checking mail.
DSP It's does not work. Please, tel me how can I
Hello all,
Friday, April 13, 2001, Dmitry S. Polunin wrote:
Hi.
I have a problem with periodical checking mail.
It's does not work. Please, tel me how can I fix this bug without
erasing account.cfg file from the mail box dir.
What OS You have? Didn't You upgraded OS or IE?
--
Bye
Marek
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Dmitry,
On 13 April 2001 at 13:03:34 +0100 (which was 13:03 where I live)
Marck D. Pearlstone wrote to Dmitry S. Polunin on TBUDL and made these
points:
(and pressed send before he'd quite finished!)
DSP I have a problem with periodical
Hello Marek,
Friday, April 13, 2001, 4:01:52 PM, you wrote:
MM Hello all,
MM Friday, April 13, 2001, Dmitry S. Polunin wrote:
Hi.
I have a problem with periodical checking mail.
It's does not work. Please, tel me how can I fix this bug without
erasing account.cfg file from the mail box
DSP I have a problem with periodical checking mail.
DSP It's does not work. Please, tel me how can I fix this bug without
DSP erasing account.cfg file from the mail box dir.
MDP Have you checked the "
If you mean "periodical checking mail" checkbox - yes! It's
checked
--
Hello Marck,
Friday, April 13, 2001, 1:32:40 PM, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
If you (or a user) are configuring multiple access points for mail
then the setting "Leave mail on server for xx days" should be used.
This will allow mail to be read from multiple locations without
problem.
??? I
DSP I have a problem with periodical checking mail.
DSP It's does not work. Please, tel me how can I fix this bug without
DSP erasing account.cfg file from the mail box dir.
MDP Have you checked the "No automatic dial for periodical checking" in
MDP the network options? That can cause such
Hello all,
I have a problem with periodical checking mail.
It's does not work. Please, tel me how can I fix this bug without
erasing account.cfg file from the mail box dir.
MM What OS You have?
NT4 SP6 IE 5.0
MMDidn't You upgraded OS or IE?
May be... can't remember what I did first:
Hello Marek,
Friday, April 13, 2001, 4:28:08 PM, you wrote:
MM Hello all,
I have a problem with periodical checking mail.
It's does not work. Please, tel me how can I fix this bug without
erasing account.cfg file from the mail box dir.
MM What OS You have?
NT4 SP6 IE 5.0
MMDidn't You
Hello Marck,
Friday, April 13, 2001, 1:36:17 PM, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
TB is designed to be user specific. *Either* use a single windows
login and multiple TB users *Or* use multiple Windows logins *and*
multiple TB installations. You can probably use a single executable
set but will
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Dmitry,
On 13 April 2001 at 16:41:42 +0400 (which was 13:41 where I live)
Dmitry S. Polunin wrote to Marek Mikus and made these points:
MM You can try to install TB again, if will be SP installed after TB.
DSP !!! Really thebat must be
Hello TBUDL!
A while back I did something that I shouldn't have done - I killed
dupes in a certain folder I have set up for a mailing list. I didn't
even stop to hesitate when the program said it was going to kill 60(!)
duplicates... I just clicked OK... :-(
How stupid of me.
What happened
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I have a strange problem that maybe an easy hit for many of the
subscribers of this group. That is for some reason I am occasionally
receiving blank messages in my inbox- that is to say no headers, from,
to, or even text in
On 13-04-2001 at 15:54, Pete P kindly wrote:
What happened was that I lost sixty messages that were NOT duplicates,
all from same person. From his later messages I have discovered that
all his messages have the same message-ID!! (..)
That is a serious error on his part. Message-IDs are
On 13-04-2001 at 16:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] kindly wrote:
I have a strange problem that maybe an easy hit for many of the
subscribers of this group. That is for some reason I am occasionally
receiving blank messages in my inbox- that is to say no headers, from,
to, or even text
On 2001-04-13 at 3:10 pm daveiw wrote:
I have a strange problem that maybe an easy hit for many of the
subscribers of this group. That is for some reason I am occasionally
receiving blank messages in my inbox- that is to say no headers, from,
to, or even text in the message!
Hello Karin,
Friday, April 13, 2001, 5:25:56 PM, you wrote:
KS Have you tried to browse that particular folder for deleted
KS messages? You might be able to salvage them that way...
Well, I've got most of them back with the list-moderator's help so
this is not as disasterous (is that a real
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Pete
On 13 April 2001 at 18:51:11 +0300 (which was 16:51 where I live) Pete P
wrote
Which leads me to a question: how *is* it possible to have same
message-ID on several messages?! I'm dumbstruck!
Check out XRay. I have seen it this list.
Thursday, April 12, 2001, 3:56:24 PM, you wrote:
When you delete a message from a folder, it is not really
removed: it is only taken out of the folder's index file
(*.tbi). When you purge, it is really deleted. But you also
need to compress from time and time: remove old entries
(messages)
On Fri, 13 Apr 2001 at 10:29:14 +0800 Thomas wrote:
This is indeed methodical,
Not really, because I didn't set out to try all functions of TB. I
just did what I usually do. I also said it's not scientific because
I knew it's not real-time monitoring, but infrequent snapshots (1
min. interval
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Pete!
On Friday, April 13, 2001 at 3:54:49 PM you wrote:
How stupid of me.
It would have been nice if TB! had told me *what* were the
messages it was about to kill... showing the basic "from" and
"subject" info for instance. Now it seems
On Fri, 13 Apr 2001 at 03:11:54 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2. I have a mailing list that is cumulating over 4,000 messages.
I decided to delete them since I don't have time to read them. It
took over 10 minutes on my slow p133.
If you're deleting all messages in a folder, several ways
On Fri, 13 Apr 2001 at 11:23:03 -0500 Dwight A Corrin wrote:
When you delete a message from a folder, it is not really
removed: it is only taken out of the folder's index file (*.tbi).
When you purge, it is really deleted. But you also need to
compress from time and time: remove old entries
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Ming-Li!
On Friday, April 13, 2001 at 6:23:24 PM you wrote:
Well, since it doesn't affect me, I'm not sure why I'm pursuing
this. Kind of foolish, ain't I? :-)
First off all, I want to thank you for it.
And then, I can tell you why:
1.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Alastair,
Friday, April 13, 2001, 3:30:57 PM, you wrote:
I have a strange problem that maybe an easy hit for many of the
subscribers of this group. That is for some reason I am occasionally
receiving blank messages in my inbox-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Ming-Li!
On Thursday, April 12, 2001 at 6:50:11 PM you wrote:
And I don't use TB's ticker, if that makes a difference.
As one who has - newly - encountered the mysterious temp problem, I
just want to fill in that I am also *not* using the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Thomas!
On Friday, April 13, 2001 at 4:29:14 AM you wrote:
This is what you have missed. If there is any doubt about whether the
"import" was successful, TB will not delete the files in the temp dir,
giving you a chance to find out whether
Hallo Ming-Li,
On Fri, 13 Apr 2001 09:23:24 -0700 GMT (14/04/2001, 00:23 +0800 GMT),
Ming-Li wrote:
and must have created a rather large log file
ML The log is about 2.4 MB, 66 thousand lines,
If that is not large...
ML I'm not sure exactly how this works.
[...]
ML 1. why
ML 2. why
So
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Marck!
On Friday, April 13, 2001 at 1:14:17 AM you wrote:
%TO=""%TO="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Just out of curiosity: Why not *%TO="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"*?
- --
Dierk Haasis
PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendMyPGPkeys
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Thomas!
On Friday, April 13, 2001 at 4:35:38 AM you wrote:
That's the risk. One should take a look at the TO header before
hitting "send". It requires an IQ above that of bread, which should be
no problem for anybody who has grown out of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Lars!
On Friday, April 13, 2001 at 8:27:25 AM you wrote:
On my machine, the attachment is shown as "message.html", not
.shtml and its content type is text/html. But you are right, I
can't delete the attachment either.
Same here.
BTW,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello David!
On Friday, April 13, 2001 at 8:31:10 AM you wrote:
I have a list like this as well. My solution is to put the following in a
folder level template for that list.
%to="" %to="%OFROMNAME on [group name] %OTOADDR"
Another side
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Michal!
On Friday, April 13, 2001 at 9:29:13 AM you wrote:
Hello
Best regards
A case of a misplaced folder level template? Or do I begin to not just
missing something but really losing it?
- --
Dierk Haasis
PGP keys available:
Hello Marck,
On Friday, April 13, 2001, 12:14:17 AM, you wrote:
MDP The only way to do this is to create edit the Folder properties and
MDP create a Reply template for the folder which includes the
MDP%TO=""%TO="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
I used this (thanks) for a list I am on, it works but
Hallo Dierk,
On Fri, 13 Apr 2001 18:44:34 +0200 GMT (14/04/2001, 00:44 +0800 GMT),
Dierk Haasis wrote:
DH A case of a misplaced folder level template? Or do I begin to not just
DH missing something but really losing it?
If in doubt, the latter. ;-)
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Moderator der
On 2001-04-13 at 6:15 pm daveiw wrote:
Many thanks for your swift replies, especially Alastair. I have tried
another client (OE) as you suggested and found that it too received 1 of
those messages. This may suggest the ISP but I have never had this
problem before. Is it possible
Hello Dierk,
Friday, April 13, 2001, 6:44:34 PM, Dierk Haasis wrote:
A case of a misplaced folder level template? Or do I begin to not just
missing something but really losing it?
Yep. Sorry. wrong folder selected when I've used mailto: from www
page. Fortunately the attachment was removed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Dierk,
On 13 April 2001 at 18:32:22 +0200 (which was 17:32 where I live)
Dierk Haasis wrote to Thomas and made these points:
DH I think I once described it on list not so long ago. The operative
DH word is "sensible".
The operative word *is*
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Adam,
On 13 April 2001 at 18:52:43 +0100 (which was 18:52 where I live)
Adam wrote to Marck D. Pearlstone and made these points:
MDP%TO=""%TO="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
^^
A I used this (thanks) for a list I am on, it works
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Michal!
On Friday, April 13, 2001 at 8:24:17 PM you wrote:
Yep. Sorry. wrong folder selected when I've used mailto: from www
page. Fortunately the attachment was removed by TBUDL server :)
Phew, am I glad, I really started to think I'm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Marck!
On Friday, April 13, 2001 at 8:43:08 PM you wrote:
And, no sooner do we start discussing the topic than a user makes a
post to two addresses bearing no relationship to this list and yet one
of those addresses is that of the list.
Friday, April 13, 2001, 12:10:40 PM, you wrote:
I have been compressing, which seems to purge. Today I tried purging,
which seems to compress. They appear to be redundant processes.
No, as Karin put it, purge and compress are two different things.
It's just in TB you can't do Purging
TBUDL,
Under account properties where the forwarding template is set, there
is an option for "Use MIME standard for forwarding". Is there a way
to control this using a template macro, rather than a global account
setting?
-=Elden=-
http://www.moondog.org
--
Elden,
Friday, April 13, 2001, 3:41:42 PM, you wrote:
EF Under account properties where the forwarding template is set,
EF there is an option for "Use MIME standard for forwarding". Is
EF there a way to control this using a template macro, rather than a
EF global account setting?
Sorry, I
Hello Thomas others on this TB! list following this thread,
Friday, April 13, 2001, you asked:
T Has anybody ever been able to delete the HTML part of a message with a
T content-type text/html?
This is what I do:
I redirect the message using Crtl+F6, addressing it to the same
address it
On Fri, 13 Apr 2001 at 16:40:43 -0500 Dwight A Corrin wrote:
It seems that when I compress all folders, it purges.
I went back to look at the explanation Karin gave you, and found
what caused the confusion. I'm also at fault, of course, since I
endorsed what she said without thinking. I guess
Hello TBUDL,
I am trying to search for all incoming messages with no Sender
that have accumulated over the years. I don't want to move them
using "Sorting/Filters", I only want to view them. So I did Tools/Search.
In the Message finder I left the "Search for" field blank,
in "Scope" I ticked
Hallo Marck,
On Fri, 13 Apr 2001 19:43:08 +0100 GMT (14/04/2001, 02:43 +0800 GMT),
Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
DH The operative word is "sensible".
MDP The operative word *is* sensible.
The *operative* word is sensible. g You operate your program, it
will do what you tell it. It makes sense.
Hallo Marck,
On Fri, 13 Apr 2001 10:20:19 +0100 GMT (13/04/2001, 17:20 +0800 GMT),
Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
T Has anybody ever been able to delete the HTML part of a message
T with a content-type text/html?
MDP Of course.
Seeing the rest of your message, I believe you mean "of course not",
Hello list members
I need a good advice and some help configure an anti spam filter.
How do I do it ?
Any Howto that I can read ?
I'll appreciate any help.
TIA.
Using TB! 1.51, M$ win 98
--
__
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
73 matches
Mail list logo
