Hello Marcus,
On Sun, 27 Oct 2002 at 06:43:11 [GMT +0100], you wrote:
M I don't have any TB format backups I can restore. It looks like I
M would have to manually recreate every account and import every
M message folder, of which there are 20+? Is it really that much of a
M hassle?
Depends.
On 10/26/2002, Anne wrote:
Hi Don,
Initial page took around 6 seconds on a 56k dialup here, with pages taking
between 4-7 seconds on average, so that's not too bad at all Don :-)
How does the PHPBB setup compare to the YaBB setup? Faster?
--
Regards,
Don Zeigler
* bringing you boring
Hello Jonathan,
On Sat, 26 Oct 2002 22:44:06 -0500 GMT (27/10/02, 10:44 +0700 GMT),
Jonathan Angliss wrote:
Due to a bug in filtering mime headers (apparently can't do it)
I wouldn't call it a bug myself, more of a design theory.
It's a bug. You can search the headers, the body, but not the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday, October 26, 2002, Thomas Fernandez wrote...
Due to a bug in filtering mime headers (apparently can't do it)
I wouldn't call it a bug myself, more of a design theory.
It's a bug. You can search the headers, the body, but not the
E-Mail Message
~~
From: Don Zeigler
Date: Sunday, October 27, 2002 at 1:11 AM
Subject: Test board up
_
DZ On 10/26/2002, Anne wrote:
Hi Don,
Initial page took around 6 seconds on a 56k dialup here, with pages taking
Raj [EMAIL PROTECTED] said on Saturday, October 26, 2002, 7:41:52 PM
Mitch,
On Sat, 26 Oct 2002, at 13:38:10 [GMT -0700] (which was 2:08 AM where I live) you
wrote:
MW I'd like to find some way of automating all that cutting-and-pasting
MW so I just have to press a couple of keys, or click a
:(
I'm still waiting for my password to arrive... and I registered early
this morning .. :(
Blessings and light,
~~~Angel
Sunday, October 27, 2002 12:43:23 AM
--
-={+}=-Senza fiduccia niente-={+}=-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | TheBat! 1.60q
| http://www.ritlabs.com
On 10/27/2002, Angel wrote:
I'm still waiting for my password to arrive... and I registered early
this morning .. :(
Try again, on the new board: www.donzeigler.com/phpbb2.
--
Regards,
Don Zeigler
* bringing you boring sigfiles for over 14 years *
...Nothing wrong with a dog that a shot gun
On 10/27/2002, Jody Watts wrote:
Could someone repost the link to the test board. I must have missed
that first e-mail
www.donzeigler.com/phpbb2
--
Regards,
Don Zeigler
* bringing you boring sigfiles for over 14 years *
...Professionals built the Titanic. Amateurs built the Ark.
Hello Anne,
On Sun, 27 Oct 2002 03:46:57 + GMT (27/10/02, 10:46 +0700 GMT),
Anne wrote:
Yahoo lists also suffer some mail loss and some users don't receive
the messages even when they are set to do so,
This is a problem I haven't encountered, but I've heard of it.
and finally the Yahoo
Hello Gary,
On Sun, 27 Oct 2002 00:06:22 -0500 GMT (27/10/02, 12:06 +0700 GMT),
Gary wrote:
T Under the Advanced tab, make sure the radio button Kill is selected
T (default).
Taking this a step further, under the advanced features.. it seems you can
call up a file for signal strings. I am
Hello Angel,
On Sun, 27 Oct 2002 at 00:44:13[GMT -0700](which was 07:44 where I
live) you wrote:
A I'm still waiting for my password to arrive... and I registered early
A this morning .. :(
Gosh, mine arrived instantly.
--
Best regards,
Richard
Using The Bat! version 1.62/Beta6 with Windows
Hello Luc,
On Sun, 27 Oct 2002 at 05:32:47[GMT +0100](which was 04:32 where I
live) you wrote:
L Maybe
L a have a cyber guardian angel lol.
Maybe :-)
I've just come back to the page after a good night's sleep and still
the same errors but, on trying the new PHBB page, this one not only
loads
Hello Anne!
On Sunday, October 27, 2002 at 4:23:48 AM you wrote:
I think a certain amount of discussion is needed before something is
tried,
Try living happily in Germany ...
--
Dierk Haasis
http://www.Write4U.de
http://Zoo.Write4U.de
PGP keys available:
Hello Jonathan,
On Sun, 27 Oct 2002 01:41:25 -0500 GMT (27/10/02, 13:41 +0700 GMT),
Jonathan Angliss wrote:
It's a bug. You can search the headers, the body, but not the lower
headers, even if you tick on anywhere.
This is the reason I said I don't think it is a bug. Maybe I agree
it should
Hello Scott,
Sunday, October 27, 2002, 12:17:32 AM, you wrote:
SM Open a folder, then click Tools | Folder Options | Folder Options, and
SM turn off Use Simple File Sharing. I don't know if this option is
SM available in XP Home, though.
No, at least not in my XPhome ;-)
--
Best regards,
Sunday, October 27, 2002, 7:02:39 AM, Leif wrote:
M I don't have any TB format backups I can restore. It looks like I
M would have to manually recreate every account and import every
M message folder, of which there are 20+? Is it really that much of a
M hassle?
LG Depends. Create the accounts
Hello all,
In August I asked how to associate links in an e-mail message
with Mozilla instead of Internet Explorer.
You helped me changed the register and everything works fine now.
I want to pass on that information to a friend, so I looked in
the register to be able to give her step-by-step
Hi Mary,
on Fri, 25 Oct 2002 08:29:45 -0500GMT (25.10.02, 14:29 +0200GMT here),
you wrote in mid:532692342.20021025082945;premiernet.net :
MB Temporarily, I'm going to go with insufficient System Resources. Put
MB the little gauge back in the tray to keep up with them.
There is a little tool,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sunday, October 27, 2002, 3:21:18 AM, Richard Wakeford, in
( mid:16932424964.20021027082118;cix.co.uk ) wrote in part:
RW And there was me saying I wouldn't use a message board. This group is
RW so friendly that you tend to be sucked in!
Hello Barry,
You wrote:
B Hello Mary,
B Sunday, October 27, 2002, 5:17:02 AM, you wrote:
snip
MB ...Dates running togetherin my sleepy head. :)
B You're sleepy ?? We've been up 24 hours solid now with sorting out the
B new message board with Don lol Oh well, it is Sunday so we can
B sleep
Hi, Peter,
You wrote:
snip
PM There is a little tool, RAM Idle Standard, that I use to handle my
PM resources on Win98. It's available at: http://www.tweaknow.com/
Thanks, Peter. I'll check it out. Think it will work with Win95?
--
Cheers,
Mary
Hi Sudip,
Saturday, October 26, 2002, 9:11:00 PM, you wrote:
SP NAV doesn't have plug-in for TB! But, it can be set up to scan
SP incoming/outgoing mails depending upon the version you are using (I'm
SP not familiar with corporate edition).
Well it is set to do so. I'm not sure if it actually
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
'Lo Lourdes,
On Sat, 26 Oct 2002 05:48:11 -0500 your time, you authored this:
LJ http://www.gfi.com/emailsecuritytest/ has a nice set of test emails
LJ I'm interested in knowing if the Anti-Virus plugins will catch the
LJ fragmented email
Hello Simon others following this thread,
Simon wrote when Lourdes inquired:
LJ http://www.gfi.com/emailsecuritytest/ has a nice set of test emails
LJ I'm interested in knowing if the Anti-Virus plugins will catch the
LJ fragmented email (eicar.com attachment)
S I was testing the AVG
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Simon,
27-Oct-2002, 13:03 Simon said:
LJ I'm interested in knowing if the Anti-Virus plugins will catch
LJ the fragmented email (eicar.com attachment)
I was testing the AVG plugin with TB! yesterday with eircar.com
... AVG caught the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
'Lo Douglas,
On Sun, 27 Oct 2002 07:35:29 -0600 your time, you authored this:
[ 8 ]
DH Are attachments contained in the message body or in a separate
DH folder? If it's the latter, AVG will alert you and quarantine the
DH message but the infected
Dear Dierk,
Going back 17:05 23.10.2002...
Sorry Johannes, the correct adage goes the exception *proofs* the
rule. The German does eventually say the same, only the German
bestätigt is a bit more misleading ...
There cannot be an exception if there is no rule.
Indeed you're right, and
Hi Sudip!
In message mid:962967375.20021027095600;ntc.net.np
on Saturday, October 26, 2002, 11:11:00 PM, you wrote:
VN Does anyone know if Norton Antivirus Corporate Edition can scan
VN mail received through TB?
SP NAV doesn't have plug-in for TB! But, it can be set up to scan
SP
Hi Jonathan!
In message mid:12151905962.20021026224406;certiflexdimension.com
on Saturday, October 26, 2002, 10:44:06 PM, you wrote:
MainSet: 40Content-Type: multipart/alternative
JA Ewww... I get a whole load of emails each day from clients, and
JA friends that all use multipart/alternative
Hello Simon,
On Sunday, October 27, 2002 at 2:03:27 PM you [S] wrote (at least in
part):
LJ http://www.gfi.com/emailsecuritytest/ has a nice set of test emails
LJ I'm interested in knowing if the Anti-Virus plugins will catch the
LJ fragmented email (eicar.com attachment)
S I was testing
On Sunday, October 27, 2002, 1:02:39 AM, Leif Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marcus I don't have any TB format backups I can restore. It looks like I
Marcus would have to manually recreate every account and import every
Marcus message folder, of which there are 20+? Is it really that much of a
There is a poll on my phpbb-powered test board regarding which script users
prefer. It will stay up until midnight Monday evening (EST). If you haven't
voted on your preferred script, you're invited to do so. Here's the link to
the poll:
http://www.donzeigler.com/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=16
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday, October 27, 2002, Thomas Fernandez wrote...
This is the reason I said I don't think it is a bug. Maybe I agree
it should allow you to search lower headers too... but when you
select the anywhere clause, I think it shouldn't actually hit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday, October 26, 2002, Scott McNay wrote...
MainSet: 40Content-Type: multipart/alternative
JA Ewww... I get a whole load of emails each day from clients, and
JA friends that all use multipart/alternative headers for including HTML
JA parts.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
'Lo Peter,
On Sun, 27 Oct 2002 16:00:20 +0100 your time, you authored this:
PP Neverthless: I do in fact wonder how Simon managed it, because I see
PP technical problems with re-assembling and virus scanning.
I didn't manage it! :-/
S I was
Sunday, October 27, 2002, 12:13:04 PM, Mary wrote in message
mid:1276473276.20021027061304;premiernet.net
MB Thanks, Peter. I'll check it out. Think it will work with Win95?
Mary, if that doesn't work for you try AnalogX's MaxMem - it's small
and free and works a treat for us and says it works
Sunday, October 27, 2002, 6:42:15 AM, Thomas wrote in message
mid:351488417.20021027134215;gmx.net
TF Well, they offer a free service to subscribers, it needs to be paid
TF for somehow. The alternative would be to charge for membership - I
TF prefer the ads. ;-)
Yep I understand that Thomas,
Sunday, October 27, 2002, 8:33:25 AM, Dierk wrote in message
mid:1983250806.20021027093325;gmx.net
DH Try living happily in Germany ...
I'll stick in England thanks Dierk ;-)
--
Cheers,
Anne
Using The Bat! v1.61 on Windows 98 4.10 Build A
Sunday, October 27, 2002, 8:21:18 AM, Richard wrote in message
mid:16932424964.20021027082118;cix.co.uk
RW And there was me saying I wouldn't use a message board. This group is
RW so friendly that you tend to be sucked in!
That's a great start Richard - if it's friendly already then it augurs
Sunday, October 27, 2002, 6:11:53 AM, Don wrote in message
mid:180314717049.20021027011153;donzeigler.com
DZ How does the PHPBB setup compare to the YaBB setup? Faster?
*Much* faster Don - around 1-2 seconds :-))) I like the PHP board
immensely
--
Cheers,
Anne
Using The Bat! v1.61 on
Sunday, October 27, 2002, 7:44:13 AM, Angel wrote in message
mid:48277258897.20021027004413;email.com
A I'm still waiting for my password to arrive... and I registered early
A this morning .. :(
Mine came instantly Angel - perhaps if you try requesting one again?
--
Cheers,
Anne
Using The
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
'Lo,
Well I should have been more thorough, so please accept my apologies to
everyone to start with. Having both Kapersky and AVG plugins loaded was
confusing matters somewhat, and causing problems as well. I shall explain as
it answers a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
'Lo,
I notice that the trash folder icon doesn't always change blue when you
delete folders or files. Is this by design? I deleted a quarantine folder
earlier and it changed to blue, which surprised me. After that it whatever I
delete the
Hello Peter,
Sunday, October 27, 2002, 3:00:20 PM, you wrote:
PP This re-assembling is done _after_ mails are received, as I could see
PP at the flicker in my message list, but there's no known hook to me in
PP The Bat! that gives the message to an AV-plugin when message list
PP actions are
Hello Richard,
Sunday, October 27, 2002, 8:21:18 AM, you wrote:
RW And there was me saying I wouldn't use a message board. This group
RW is so friendly that you tend to be sucked in!
Tell us about it a whole 26Hrs worth LOL
--
Best regards,
Barry2
Using The Bat! v1.61 on Windows 98
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
'Lo Barry2,
On Sun, 27 Oct 2002 19:32:52 + your time, you authored this:
B When we tried out the whole range of test e-mails from www.gfi.com
B using Kaspersky AVP it picked up *all* of them without a hitch !
I've done a *lot* of testing
Hi Thomas!
In message mid:461061460.20021027105209;gmx.net
on Saturday, October 26, 2002, 9:52:09 PM, you wrote:
TF The biggest part of the message may be the body; you can search for
TF signla strings in it. The lower headers are just a line or two. You
TF cannot search for signal string in
Hello Barry2,
On Sunday, October 27, 2002 at 8:32:52 PM you [B] wrote (at least in
part):
PP This re-assembling is done _after_ mails are received, as I could see
PP at the flicker in my message list, but there's no known hook to me in
PP The Bat! that gives the message to an AV-plugin when
Hello Simon,
On Sunday, October 27, 2002 at 7:54:51 PM you [S] wrote (at least in
part):
[AVG plugin test]
S These are rest of the test files from gfi.com that ended up in my mailbox.
S * Object Codebase vulnerability test
S * MIME header vulnerability test
S * Iframe remote vulnerability test
Hi Anne,
Anne wrote:
snip
A Mary, if that doesn't work for you try AnalogX's MaxMem - it's small
A and free and works a treat for us and says it works with all versions
A of Windows :-) (He does all sorts of neat little toys including a
A pop-up killer, cookie controller, and loads more
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
'Lo Peter,
On Sun, 27 Oct 2002 22:15:03 +0100 your time, you authored this:
snip
PP None of them is a virus. Excluding the 'eicar.com [1/5]' which can't
PP be detected, all of the rest are 'exploits', no viruses.
umm, yeah, that's what I said, as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In mid:15424395968.20021027185451;theycallmesimon.co.uk,
Simon [S] wrote:'
S The AVG plugin only catches the eircar.com virus attachment our
S of all the exploits sent by gfi.com.
I ran the same test and got the same result with DrWeb.
Which
On Sunday, October 27, 2002, 8:44 AM, you wrote:
I was testing the AVG plugin with TB! yesterday with eircar.com
... AVG caught the attached file ... So obviously after
reassembly but it still gets caught :)
MDP Excellent news. Thanks for reporting back with this.
I got sent an email
Yo Simon,
you wrote regarding:
DH Are attachments contained in the message body or in a separate
DH folder? If it's the latter, AVG will alert you and quarantine the
DH message but the infected file remains in the attach (or other)
DH folder...
S I had always kept attachments in a separate
Hello Simon,
Not that this is of major importance, just that I was wondering if
the flashy blue glyph was reserved for specific actions :)
If you have any messages in your Trash folder just mark any of them as
Unread and you'll see what happens :)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El
Hello Thomas,
Saturday, October 26, 2002, 10:43:16 PM, you wrote:
TF The oldest message begins a thread by Subject/From/To is plain
TF English to me, too. Let's interpret this: If you thread by the
TF Subject, From or To field in the message, the oldest message will be
TF used as the root of the
Hello Douglas,
On Sunday, October 27, 2002 at 10:59:41 PM you [DH] wrote (at least in
part):
DH BTW, your signature delimitator isn't functioning.
Wrong. It's just 'escaped' by PGP-signature. PGP escaped dashes at
beginning of a line by prepending '- ' for not getting confused when
decoding /
On Monday, October 21, 2002, Don Zeigler wrote:
D My copy of phpbb isn't doing much -- I could stick up a TB board and see
D what happens. As far as moderation, by their very nature message boards are
D rather more freewheeling than a more-ordered mailing list, instead being
D much like
On Monday, October 21, 2002, Allie C Martin wrote:
A I've followed this thread with interest and agree with the advantages
A a message board would offer. Take my experience with my Dell for
A instance.
There is also a very active, unofficial newsgroups that deals with Dell
systems, proving only
On Monday, October 21, 2002, James Senick wrote:
J For something like the help file, I suggest we use that advantage.
J I'm sure RitLabs would be for the context-sensitive help idea
J mentioned. Perhaps if there were a project leader and several
J volunteers willing to share their knowledge in
Replying to your message of Sunday, October 27, 2002, 2:43:07 PM:
ACM The
ACM main problem with this test being that real viruses aren't being
ACM used.
I have lots of real viruses if you really want to do some testing. ;O)
--
Pete
www.milneweb.com
Sunday, October 27, 2002
3:27:01
Hi Allie!
In message mid:88204631825.20021027164307;landscreek.net
on Sunday, October 27, 2002, 3:43:07 PM, you wrote:
S Although AVG catches the eircar.com virus attachment it failed
S to catch and quarantine any of the others.
ACM yawn ;) I really question the applicability of such
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
'Lo Allie,
On Sun, 27 Oct 2002 16:43:07 -0500 your time, you authored this:
ACM Which begs the question on this test. Are virus scanners supposed to
ACM quarantine files that aren't really viruses?
I don't think it is a question of, 'are they
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
'Lo Miguel,
On Sun, 27 Oct 2002 23:10:16 +0100 your time, you authored this:
Not that this is of major importance, just that I was wondering if
the flashy blue glyph was reserved for specific actions :)
MAU If you have any messages in your
Hi Simon!
In message mid:15341266296.20021027233602;theycallmesimon.co.uk
on Sunday, October 27, 2002, 5:36:02 PM, you wrote:
S I understand what you are saying, and of course why you logically question
S this, but I personally don't really want to go through a library of virii
S testing
Saturday, October 26, 2002, 8:17:25 PM, you wrote:
VN Does anyone know if Norton Antivirus Corporate Edition can scan
VN mail received through TB?
SP NAV doesn't have plug-in for TB! But, it can be set up to scan
SP incoming/outgoing mails depending upon the version you are using (I'm
SP not
Hello Peter,
Sunday, October 27, 2002, 9:07:24 PM, you wrote:
PP Hello Barry2,
PP On Sunday, October 27, 2002 at 8:32:52 PM you [B] wrote (at least in
PP part):
B AIUI - TB! uses temp files to bring in mail and that's where the AV
B would pick up the virus definition ( providing you have it
Hi Vishal!
In message mid:731649081.20021027185246;myrealbox.com
on Sunday, October 27, 2002, 8:52:46 PM, you wrote:
VN Thanks Scott. Are you sure about this though? And if it does, that
VN that mean that I don't need a corresponding dll to force TB to check
VN email from its end? I know NAV
Hello Simon,
Sunday, October 27, 2002, 8:15:34 PM, you wrote:
S -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
S Hash: SHA1
S 'Lo Barry2,
S On Sun, 27 Oct 2002 19:32:52 + your time, you authored this:
B When we tried out the whole range of test e-mails from www.gfi.com
B using Kaspersky AVP it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In mid:1050671.20021027171952;local.nu,
Scott Mcnay [SM] wrote:'
SM A properly-implemented AV program *should* consider the EICAR
SM test virus to be a real virus. Otherwise, it defeats the
SM purpose of even having a test.
The eicar test virus
Sunday, October 27, 2002, 4:04:55 PM, you wrote:
SM Norton, et. al., scan email by intercepting the ports used for
SM transferring email. The plugins are modules directly called by the
SM email program,, thus don't incur the extra overhead of intercepting
SM and parsing the POP3/SMTP data
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In mid:15341266296.20021027233602;theycallmesimon.co.uk,
Simon [S] wrote:'
S I don't think it is a question of, 'are they supposed to?', but
S rather, 'can they?'. And of course Kapersky can, so to me it
S simply means Kapersky is providing more
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In mid:862904616.20021027191341;myrealbox.com,
Vishal Nakra [VN] wrote:'
SM Norton, et. al., scan email by intercepting the ports used for
SM transferring email. The plugins are modules directly called by the
SM email program,, thus don't incur the
Hi Allie!
In message mid:140215282529.20021027194038;landscreek.net
on Sunday, October 27, 2002, 6:40:38 PM, you wrote:
ACM For stopping harmless test files? I don't know how popular those
ACM test files are apart from eicar.com which is well known (note that
ACM eicar is picked up by most
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
'Lo Allie,
On Sun, 27 Oct 2002 19:40:38 -0500 your time, you authored this:
ACM For stopping harmless test files? I don't know how popular those
ACM test files are apart from eicar.com which is well known (note that
ACM eicar is picked up by most
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In mid:17549403453.20021028015139;theycallmesimon.co.uk,
Simon [S] wrote:'
S I might not need it, but not everyone runs TB! and as AV packages
S are not authored solely for TB! I think it is a valid extra, even
S if redundant in this instance.
Since
Sunday, October 27, 2002, 5:17:02 AM, Mary wrote in message
mid:829761099.20021027001702;premiernet.net
MB But the plug-in came with it. I have described this at such length,
MB because maybe you are supposed to have the plug-in there to enable at
MB the click of a mouse, and the code you got
Sunday, October 27, 2002, 12:08:05 PM, Mary wrote in message
mid:1586173987.20021027060805;premiernet.net
MB Caught your first log-in (Post) last night. Figured you and Anne had been
MB working frantically behind the scenes with Don. joy,joy
Yeah, we've been having great fun on the board Mary
Hello Paul,
On Sun, 27 Oct 2002 16:51:50 -0500 GMT (28/10/02, 04:51 +0700 GMT),
Paul Cartwright wrote:
I got sent an email with the bugbear virus. AVG quarantined it, no
problem. I sent the sender a message and he found a koo.exe file on his
PC. He uses eudora, not OE or OL, I was surprised!
Hi, Anne,
You wrote:
A Sunday, October 27, 2002, 5:17:02 AM, Mary wrote in message
A mid:829761099.20021027001702;premiernet.net
MB But the plug-in came with it. I have described this at such length,
MB because maybe you are supposed to have the plug-in there to enable at
MB the click of a
Hi Allie!
In message mid:63222346407.20021027213828;landscreek.net
on Sunday, October 27, 2002, 8:38:28 PM, you wrote:
S they are .com or .exe types. Generally speaking, even the most
S basic of user gets to grips with the dangers of running .com
S and .exe files, as they are commonplace
Sunday, October 27, 2002, 11:19:52 PM, Scott wrote in message
mid:1050671.20021027171952;local.nu
SM A properly-implemented AV program *should* consider the EICAR test
SM virus to be a real virus. Otherwise, it defeats the purpose of even
SM having a test.
Interestingly enough Nod32 -which
Sunday, October 27, 2002, 9:13:21 PM, Mary wrote in message
mid:1996611033.20021027151321;premiernet.net
A http://www.analogx.com/contents/download/system.htm
MB Excellent. More and more toys for me to play with.
Thought you'd like them Mary :-)))
--
Cheers,
Anne
Using The Bat! v1.61 on
Hi Anne!
In message mid:142130087802.20021028030202;gmx.co.uk
on Sunday, October 27, 2002, 9:02:02 PM, you wrote:
A Interestingly enough Nod32 -which is another of the highly rated AV
A programs- doesn't detect the eicar test file, and when asked about
A this their response apparently was that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In mid:884020203.20021027205132;premiernet.net,
Mary Bull [MB] wrote:'
MB I've been reading Allie to Simon. Seems like a plug-in is not
MB really necessary, anyway.
Though not absolutely necessary, it can be useful, and I personally
recommend using
Hello Allie,
On Sun, 27 Oct 2002 21:38:28 -0500 GMT (28/10/02, 09:38 +0700 GMT),
Allie C Martin wrote:
PMFJI.
S I think the point is one of familiarity. Not every user is
S going to be as familiar with .vbs extensions, for example, as
S they are .com or .exe types. Generally speaking,
Hi, Anne,
It's as we thought. No plug-in for The Bat! in the Kaspersky Personal
Version.
I copied and pasted this from the website (not to get into html
trouble.)
From the website selling Kaspersky, both on CD and download. Quote:
Kaspersky Anti-Virus Personal was specifically developed to
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 02:41:25AM + or thereabouts, Anne wrote:
Sunday, October 27, 2002, 5:17:02 AM, Mary wrote in message
mid:829761099.20021027001702;premiernet.net
MB But the plug-in came with it. I have described this at such length,
MB because maybe you are supposed to have the
Monday, October 28, 2002, 2:51:32 AM, Mary wrote in message
mid:884020203.20021027205132;premiernet.net
MB I think that must be it. I will go read on the website. That website
MB for buying Kaspersky could really use some organizing.
Agreed - it's a very badly structured site I feel - can be
Monday, October 28, 2002, 3:09:22 AM, Scott wrote in message
mid:5879820890.20021027210922;local.nu
SM The entire purpose of the EICAR test virus is to be able to confirm
SM that the antivirus software is indeed installed and working properly.
Yep I know Scott - which is why I thought the
I am a newbie and I accidentaly hit the refilter option of a msg that
was in my inbox. The result was that a new folder was created. I would
like to move the msg from that folder back to the inbox or another
folder. I am not renaming the folder. How do I move the msg.
Randal
[EMAIL
Hi SCN,
On Sunday, October 27, 2002, 9:34 PM, you mentioned about Moving msg from one folder
to another:
S I would like to move the msg from that folder back to the inbox or
S another folder. I am not renaming the folder. How do I move the msg.
Two ways, drag and drop in the grand Windows
Monday, October 28, 2002, 3:17:05 AM, Gary wrote in message
mid:20021027211705.A3136;major.mygirlfriday.info
G Anne, As an afterthought, I purchased the Personal Kaspersky edition, last
G January, for $49, I believe. It worked well, and even on their site, said
G it would have a plug-in for
Hello Gary,
Monday, October 28, 2002, 3:17:05 AM, you wrote:
G Anne, As an afterthought, I purchased the Personal Kaspersky edition, last
G January, for $49, I believe. It worked well, and even on their site, said
G it would have a plug-in for TB!... Well this turned out not to be true,
G even
Hi Simon,
On Sunday, October 27, 2002 23:36 your local time, (Monday, 05:21 my
local time), you wrote:
I don't think it is a question of, 'are they supposed to?', but
rather, 'can they?'. And of course Kapersky can, so to me it simply
means Kapersky is providing more prophylactic power than
Hi Anne,
On Monday, October 28, 2002 03:02 your local time, (08:47 my local
time), you [A] wrote:
A Interestingly enough Nod32 -which is another of the highly rated AV
A programs- doesn't detect the eicar test file, and when asked about
A this their response apparently was that Nod32 was
Hi Allie,
On Sunday, October 27, 2002 19:40 your local time, (Monday, 06:25 my
local time), you wrote:
An A-V scanner that stops and weeds out files just based on their
file type isn't really a scanner.
I don't think this behavior is hard-coded into any reputable AV
scanners so they cannot be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In mid:519063125.20021028105400;ntc.net.np,
Sudip Pokhrel [SP] wrote:'
SP And in case of Kaspersky (or in case of Simons' copy of it), the
SP heuristic feature was probably turned on by default. AVG also
SP has this feature but is turned off by
Hi Allie,
On Monday, October 28, 2002 00:15 your local time, (11:00 my local
time), you wrote:
Both NOD32 and DrWeb have heuristic scanners but except for eicar,
they didn't pick up the test files as being viruses.
Even with Heuristic feature turned on? That would probably mean
Kaspersky has
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
