DOWNLOAD URL at Roguemoticons brings 404 page error [was Re: Rogues pics]

2004-10-03 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Michael! On Sunday, October 03, 2004, 9:28 AM, you wrote: MA> Is the person that takes care of this modifying the file and it is MA> not available? or am I having a bad day The person doing the code is Leif Gregory. I wrote to him earlier this morning about this, but have not had a reply y

Re: OT: Hard Drive partitioning [was Re: Replace Inbox Folder manually?]

2004-10-02 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Paul! On Saturday, October 02, 2004, 3:49 PM, you wrote: MB OT: If I should decide to partition my HD and put a distro of MB Linux on it to run The Bat!, would you help me? ASK>>> I know nothing about Linux (except that there's a nice disk-only ASK>>> version to reset Windows NT pa

Re: Replace Inbox Folder manually?

2004-10-02 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Lynn! On Saturday, October 02, 2004, 3:33 PM, you wrote: MB>> Marck? I can't figure out whether she's putting me on, or MB>> not? Help? L> Not at all ... I built the account to have access to the L> betas, tried to sign up for the list, and the next day I L> got a 'no access' notice ... th

OT: Hard Drive partitioning [was Re: Replace Inbox Folder manually?]

2004-10-02 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Alexander! On Saturday, October 02, 2004, 3:24 PM, you wrote: MB>> OT: If I should decide to partition my HD and put a distro of MB>> Linux on it to run The Bat!, would you help me? ASK> I know nothing about Linux (except that there's a nice disk-only ASK> version to reset Windows NT passw

Re: Replace Inbox Folder manually?

2004-10-02 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Adrian! On Saturday, October 02, 2004, 3:15 PM, you wrote: AA> But anyway, if you never run into the same problem like mine, then AA> its maybe really something which is not very common and I have to AA> live with it. Adrian! Please? Ask on tbbeta! :) -- Best regards, Mary :Trill: The Ba

Re: Replace Inbox Folder manually?

2004-10-02 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Lynn! On Saturday, October 02, 2004, 2:27 PM, you wrote: L> I'm using a beta, and would be *delighted* to praise it, L> but when I tried to subscribe to TBBeta, I got a sharp L> note back saying I wasn't qualified to subscribe :-) L> I can't figure out where I went wrong .. lol! Marck? I

Re: Replace Inbox Folder manually?

2004-10-02 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Alexander! On Saturday, October 02, 2004, 12:58 PM, you wrote: ASK> EXE PATH ASK> Program Files ASK> ProgramDir ASK> Working Directory It's plain you may be able to help Adrian find and fix the problem. I wrote to him encouraging him to cross-post to tbbeta before I saw this latest fro

Re: Replace Inbox Folder manually?

2004-10-02 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Adrian! On Saturday, October 02, 2004, 12:45 PM, you wrote, in part: MB>> I think if you were there, you would soon have the attention of MB>> 9Val or Stefan. AA> Thanks for the tip, but unfortunately i already posted the AA> question here, and cross posting is not nice I think in this on

Re: Replace Inbox Folder manually?

2004-10-02 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Adrian! On Saturday, October 02, 2004, 11:36 AM, you wrote, in part: AA> But i must say the really improved the V3 since the ReleaseBETA AA> Version Do you mean you are running a beta version? Are you subscribed to tbbeta? If so, all these questions might get better help on that list. The

Re: v3 Closing silently and frequently

2004-09-23 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Marten! On Thursday, September 23, 2004, 5:42 PM, you wrote: MB>> Would you consider upgrading to a beta post-release version? aacu> Absolutely blooming not. Only to find that I'll have to lose aacu> more earning time sorting out other bugs. As it is I'm doing a aacu> full back up every ho

Re: v3 Closing silently and frequently

2004-09-23 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Monty! On Thursday, September 23, 2004, 4:45 PM, you wrote: M> ... Since upgrading to v3 of TB, it's closing randomly and M> frequently without notice, even when I'm working with it. Other M> times it'll be minimised and not even working - suddenly I'll M> notice the mail ticker is gone, an

Re: Linux, as a possible TB 'environment' and 'in general'

2004-09-23 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Mica! On Thursday, September 23, 2004, 2:31 PM, you wrote: MM> Knoppix has installed copy of Wine too, so you could also try to MM> compel TB to work in this environment. But, I may need Crossover-Office. Also. Hmm. MM> And although Knoppix has pretty good and extensive documentation, I l

Re: Linux, as a possible TB 'environment' and 'in general'

2004-09-23 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Peter! On Thursday, September 23, 2004, 1:47 PM, you wrote: MB>> I really wanted to have it on the CD rather than a download, so MB>> that's why I spent the money. :) PM> This is a good way to go. I can't afford much extra money, and i PM> also like it fast, so I downloaded Knoppix and bur

Re: Linux, as a possible TB 'environment' and 'in general'

2004-09-23 Thread Mary Bull
Hello DZ-Jay! On Thursday, September 23, 2004, 1:11 PM, you wrote: MB>> I'll report back in when I have the Knoppix CD in hand. ... DJ> Keep in mind, as with any other piece of software, that your DJ> mileage may vary. Although I haven't had any problems with Knoppix DJ> in any of the computers

Re: Linux, as a possible TB 'environment' and 'in general'

2004-09-23 Thread Mary Bull
Hello DZ-Jay! On Thursday, September 23, 2004, 12:38 PM, you wrote: DJ> ... just so you know, and for anybody else following this DJ> (admittedly offtopic) thread, the download is free, but then DJ> you'll need to burn it into a CD yourself, as its an ISO image. DJ> The price they charge is just

Re: Linux, as a possible TB 'environment' and 'in general'

2004-09-23 Thread Mary Bull
Hello DZ-Jay! On Thursday, September 23, 2004, 10:37 AM, you wrote: MB>> I've been talking for months on tbot about learning Linux. MB>> Circumstances just haven't been right. I have no doubt that I can MB>> learn to use it, though, and I'm certainly not a scientist! :) DJ> You might want to che

Re: Linux, as a possible TB 'environment' and 'in general' (was: Re: bayesit063.rar bayesit064.rar bayesit065.rar ?)

2004-09-23 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Simon! On Thursday, September 23, 2004, 8:43 AM, you wrote: MM>> Hence, Linux, simply, is NOT "easy", and will never be. (-: SM> It IS easy, if you spend as much time learning it as you have SM> spend on Windows. I believe you are right. I was bewildered for months and years when I went f

Re: dispatcher wish list

2004-09-23 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Thomas! On Thursday, September 23, 2004, 8:22 AM, you wrote: MB>> Even I had a problem to solve, with only two accounts. If I set MB>> one to automatically periodically check mail at short MB>> intervals--say, like 8 minutes--and by coincidence I happen to MB>> manually check mail on the ot

Re: dispatcher wish list

2004-09-22 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Deborah! On Wednesday, September 22, 2004, 6:56 PM, you wrote: Thomas Fernandez >> Referring to Deborah's other question: No, it is Thomas Fernandez >> not possible to pause the despatcher. DS> + DS> Am I the only one who'd find this useful? The only one with DS> dial-up who gets buck

Re: V3: yes or not in a few words...

2004-09-21 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Clive! On Tuesday, September 21, 2004, 12:32 PM, you wrote: MB>> People with very complicated filters in 2.xx or 1.xx or who MB>> Removed their old Bat and tried to do a clean install did get MB>> into trouble. CT> As well as a significant number of people who built simple filters CT> anew

Re: V3: yes or not in a few words...

2004-09-21 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Maggie! On Tuesday, September 21, 2004, 11:31 AM, you wrote: Maggie>>> What does NFS mean? MM>> New Funny System. :grin: MM>> A filter system ... so you couldn't figure out how to transfer MM>> your old filters to the new ones. M> :rotfl: ! Hmm. Maybe I'd better leave it until my full fo

Re: V3: yes or not in a few words...

2004-09-20 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Maggie! On Monday, September 20, 2004, 10:17 PM, you wrote: M> I look forward to the _clarity_ part. :D What does NFS mean? New Filter System. The guys started abbreviating it that way on tbbeta to have a short way of comparing it to the OFS (Old Filter System). It truly is simpler. Even I

Re: V3: yes or not in a few words...

2004-09-20 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Joseph! On Monday, September 20, 2004, 9:42 AM, you wrote: Joe>> I will say that V3 is not stable, at lease for me. JN> I have had no stability problems. The post-release Beta, which is JN> not really appropriate for discussion on this list, is working fine JN> for me, and my CPU is old

Re: registration code

2004-09-17 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Russ! On Tuesday, September 14, 2004, 4:29 PM, you wrote: Mary>> Element5, from whom I bought mine, said that if the key had not Mary>> arrived within 48 hours, I should write back to them. R> well i just got a quick reply back from cifnet.com sales with the R> registration key :) Great!

Re: registration code

2004-09-14 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Marten! On Tuesday, September 14, 2004, 3:48 PM, you wrote: J Ok, So if the e-mail addresses from the help menu are not valid J anymore, where do we send requests for help or information. Mary>>> http://www.ritlabs.com/en/about/contacts.php aacu> My reg key came from: aacu> [E

Re: registration code

2004-09-14 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Razgo! On Tuesday, September 14, 2004, 3:39 PM, you wrote: J>>> Ok, So if the e-mail addresses from the help menu are not valid J>>> anymore, where do we send requests for help or information. I J>>> have not received my registration number yet and I purchased J>>> thebat three days ago. No

Re: upgrading

2004-09-14 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Barry! On Tuesday, September 14, 2004, 2:35 PM, you wrote: BJ> Its very simple to uninstall SP2 Mary, just do it from Add Remove BJ> Programs Well, Add/Remove Programs works sometimes and sometimes it doesn't. Anyway, I don't want to uninstall SP2. I think that it has some safety fixes whi

Re: upgrading

2004-09-14 Thread Mary Bull
Hello sacksa! On Tuesday, September 14, 2004, 12:37 PM, you wrote: scc> 1. For me, what would I gain by upgrading to ver. 3.0? Do you use filters to direct your mails from the Message Dispatcher to various folders within The Bat!? If you do that manually, and you are comfortable without any of

Re: New Competition for The Bat!

2004-09-14 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Lynn! On Tuesday, September 14, 2004, 10:24 AM, you wrote: L> You seriously want me to mess with templates, with them L> *still* not working??? Maybe I need to go to TBTech and L> see if they can figure it out there ... L> However, it worked - this illustrates my general L> recklessness, o

Re: New Competition for The Bat!

2004-09-14 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Lynn! On Tuesday, September 14, 2004, 10:00 AM, you wrote: SC>> It looks like The Bat! has some competition. :running: L> But we don't have to do anything to get there with TB :-) Right, on Lynn! Joy to you and me. :) BTW, could you please put your name below your cut mark? Would save me

Re: Awfully quiet

2004-09-13 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Terry! On Monday, September 13, 2004, 12:06 PM, you wrote: MB>> Beta V. 3.0.0.11 is the best yet--stable as a rock, TGM> Has the problem of not downloading (and losing) e-mail messages been TGM> fixed yet. Two people were complaining on Friday, September 10: Nick Andriash, who said it wa

Re: Awfully quiet

2004-09-13 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Thorvald! On Monday, September 13, 2004, 11:08 AM, you wrote: TN> It has been awfully quiet the last days. Only a few specific-problem related threads on tbudl. An absolute filter-improving party going on at tbbeta, among other things. And pretty lively over on tbot, also. TN> Is TB3 fa

OT: Shakespeare Random Insult Generator [was Re: A new one]

2004-09-11 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Mica! On Saturday, September 11, 2004, 11:43 AM, you wrote: MM>>> And for transfer errors I'd suggest Shakespearian Random Cursing MM>>> Generator. MB>> :rofl2: MM> Not any "invention" of mine. It really exists: MM> . I went there, but it

Re: A new one

2004-09-11 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Mica! On Saturday, September 11, 2004, 7:55 AM, you wrote: MM> And for transfer errors I'd suggest Shakespearian Random Cursing MM> Generator. :rofl2: -- Best regards, Mary :Trill: The Bat! 3.0.0.11 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2 _

Re: registration code

2004-09-09 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Joe! On Thursday, September 09, 2004, 4:46 PM, you wrote: J> Ok, So if the e-mail addresses from the help menu are not valid J> anymore, where do we send requests for help or information. J> I have not received my registration number yet and I purchased thebat J> three days ago. No one

Re: No Kaspersky AntiVirus Plug-in with The Bat! v3.0?

2004-09-09 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Nick! On Thursday, September 09, 2004, 8:40 AM, you wrote: MB>> What are you using? (This comment might be more appropriate for MB>> tbot.) Linux? I am seriously considering learning that OS. ND> Ha... the toy software I was talking about is TB! That says ND> something about Microsoft's

Re: No Kaspersky AntiVirus Plug-in with The Bat! v3.0?

2004-09-09 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Nick! On Thursday, September 09, 2004, 5:47 AM, you wrote: MB>> Nick, it's going to be okay. It's being worked on. ND> Thanks for the encouragement. It's a bit of a strain sometimes as ND> I'm one of a very few who don't go the MS route. Any problems I ND> encounter are perceived as a resu

Re: Meaning of these Smileys

2004-09-08 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Chris! On Wednesday, September 08, 2004, 7:17 PM, you wrote: MB>> :timemachine: C> Okay... Now we need a :tardis:. If only we could get rights from C> the BBC... We have one, courtesy of Ben Z. (Plan9) and Marck D. Pearlstone. :realtardis: It's a real tardis. LOL In the process of acquir

Re: Meaning of these Smileys

2004-09-08 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Zonnet! On Wednesday, September 08, 2004, 1:53 PM, you wrote: Z>>> :42: MB>> That's in the "Hitchhiker's Guide." It's part of the story and also MB>> sums up a certain philosophy. It is the "Answer" to "Life, the MB>> Universe, and Everything," except, the question is missing. Z> You

Re: Meaning of these Smileys

2004-09-08 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Zonnet! On Wednesday, September 08, 2004, 1:08 PM, you wrote: Z> h2g2 Abbreviation for *The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy* by Douglas Adams and miniature of its cover illustration. It's an old and very popular book--actually, series of books, which began as a BBC radio program

Re: No Kaspersky AntiVirus Plug-in with The Bat! v3.0?

2004-09-08 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Nick! On Wednesday, September 08, 2004, 12:37 PM, you wrote: L0>>> I just upgraded to The Bat! v3.0, and I just discovered that L0>>> this new version does not include an AntiVirus plugin for L0>>> Kaspersky AntiVirus. CW>> I mentioned this a couple of months back; CW>>

Re: I'm feeling left out

2004-09-07 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Marten! On Tuesday, September 07, 2004, 5:00 PM, you wrote: MB>> And when I explained, you didn't answer me. Did you see that post? aacu> Phew! I'm not in Coventry! I am so glad that I'm not either, in regard to you! aacu> Yes I did see that - got confused and didn't reply - a bit rude a

Re: I'm feeling left out

2004-09-07 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Marten! On Tuesday, September 07, 2004, 4:04 PM, you wrote: aacu> I am sending messages, but no one is replying - I haven't been aacu> ostracised for saying v3 was good, have I? I haven't had any help to offer on your last few problems. And you misunderstood when I tried to point you to Ba

Re: Mail disappearing after connection center hangs

2004-09-07 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Eddie! On Tuesday, September 07, 2004, 8:44 AM, you wrote: EC> @Mary: EC> If you post a msgId that user can refer to please put the 'mid:' just EC> after the '<' and before the midId-Number. EC> Instead of: mid:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> EC> do this : EC> Otherwise you

Re: CPU & memory usage

2004-09-07 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Mary! On Tuesday, September 07, 2004, 6:36 AM, you wrote: MB> My Task Manager says I'm using about 240 MB out 512 MB RAM. But I'm MB> running 55 processes in 4 applications, including my AV, F-Secure. MB> It says Page File use is 4 per cent. Showing my age. I put that backwards. CPU usage

Re: Icons in TB! v3 are too large

2004-09-07 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Alexander! On Tuesday, September 07, 2004, 7:29 AM, you wrote: ASK>>> ...wow, I wasn't aware there's latops with CRT displays! Aren't ASK>>> they a bit uncomfortable to carry around? RO>> I got one in the cupboard next to me. One of the first Compaq RO>> luggable (OK not really a laptop)

Re: Bouncing Emails

2004-09-07 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Mix! On Tuesday, September 07, 2004, 3:49 AM, you wrote: Ludovic>> I didn't know that too. How can I bounce a mail ? MicCullen> It's just another method of adding to used bandwidth. I'm so glad to be on the same page with you here! And, as Doug W. said in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] in the cas

Re: CPU & memory usage

2004-09-07 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Doug! On Tuesday, September 07, 2004, 12:32 AM, you wrote: DW> Can I ask people to monitor their cpu usage? Although at the moment DW> and for the last 5 minutes it's been taking only 1 or 2% of cpu time, My Task Manager says I'm using about 240 MB out 512 MB RAM. But I'm running 55 proc

Re: Version3 ?!

2004-09-06 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Richard! On Monday, September 06, 2004, 4:38 PM, you wrote: RW> Each to their own and TB! gives everyone the chance to customise RW> to their taste. I reckon that's a plus but, due to the fractious RW> nature of many at this present time, I'll probably be shot down in RW> flames ;-) Indeed

Re: Connections failing...

2004-09-06 Thread Mary Bull
Hello admin! On Monday, September 06, 2004, 11:42 AM, you wrote: MB>> Would you want to consider using BayesFilter? MB>> So far no one using BayesFilter has reported a problem, as far as MB>> my reading and memory go. aacu> As I suggested in my posting - I've tried BayesIt but have

Re: Connections failing...

2004-09-06 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Marten! On Monday, September 06, 2004, 10:29 AM, you wrote: aacu> I have v3 and the new filter system transferred from v2 like a aacu> dream and works beautifully. Well worth the upgrade fee alone. So glad to hear that you're pleased. aacu> However - query: aacu> This has always applied s

Re: Mail disappearing after connection center hangs

2004-09-06 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Richard! On Monday, September 06, 2004, 10:07 AM, you wrote: MB>> This problem is being addressed by many through using BayesFilter MB>> rather than BayesIT. RHS> I'm going to try BayesFilter. < ... > Question - should I set all RHS> preferences in the filter itself, or should I leave the

Re: Mail disappearing after connection center hangs

2004-09-06 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Richard! On Monday, September 06, 2004, 7:30 AM, you wrote: RHS> I have just upgraded to v.3 and BayesIt 0.6.01. Twice now the RHS> connection center has hung up when downloading mail ... This problem is being addressed by many through using BayesFilter rather than BayesIT. Here's a quote

Re: Is there a printout or sample of all smileys?

2004-09-05 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Michael! On Sunday, September 05, 2004, 10:24 PM, you wrote: MLW> Is there a way to preview all the smiley's so that I know what is MLW> available to me? One set of smileys, the Default set, downloaded with The Bat! Use the DShow filter that Robin Anson just posted in [EMAIL PROTECTED] Al

Re: New here, some questions.

2004-09-05 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Leif! On Sunday, September 05, 2004, 10:53 AM, you wrote: A>> until things at your end are fixed (after all, its just the smiley A>> collection, not the submission page etc. etc.) LG> Not at all! Thank you very much for making it available to LG> everyone until I get these problems sorted

Re: Licence unhappiness?

2004-09-04 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Mic! On Sunday, September 05, 2004, 12:18 AM, you wrote: Mary>> It loads fast, also, and--whether coincidence or not--my mails Mary>> are coming down faster from the Mail Dispatcher, too. MicCullen> How are you measuring that? Subjectively, of course. Didn't put a stopwatch on it. But 75

Re: Licence unhappiness?

2004-09-04 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Bill! On Saturday, September 04, 2004, 6:26 PM, you wrote: MB>> I think that it loads faster upon launch, also. BM> Mary, are you using the "efficient" version (pro) or the "easy" BM> version (home)? I'm using the Professional version. And just today, because I'm subscribed to tbbeta, I s

Re: No more colons

2004-09-04 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Lynn! On Saturday, September 04, 2004, 1:27 PM, you wrote: MDP>> And by using sensible handles, :grin: still looks reasonable as MDP>> 'grin' wrapped in colons - the intent preserved, whatever the MDP>> viewer. L> Were we supposed to see a smilie on :grin:? Yes. Except it would not appear

Re: No more colons (was: Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not)

2004-09-04 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Lynn! On Saturday, September 04, 2004, 1:20 PM, you wrote: MB>> Therefore, if it's okay, let's have a poll: MB>> 1) For Smiley handles enclosed in colons : : MB>> 2) For Smiley handles enclosed in brackets < > L> Smileys in colons would probably be easier for me to implement .. Enclose

Re: No more colons (was: Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not)

2004-09-04 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Mary! On Saturday, September 04, 2004, 11:46 AM, you wrote: ASK>> Dunno - I just created my own smiley theme, and it contains a ASK>> ":-)" handle, of course! ;-) MB> That explains why I don't see it--neither in the default.msl nor MB> in the pcwsmileys.msl as downloaded (default with TB!,

Re: No more colons (was: Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not)

2004-09-04 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Alexander! On Saturday, September 04, 2004, 11:19 AM, you wrote: ASK>>> ... the smiley interpreter doesn't interpret anything in ,,, <> < ... > ASK> I mean - I placed "" as a handle there. Including the ASK> "chevrons" aka pointed brackets. Placing "*g*" is interpreted, ASK> however. Ah.

Re: No more colons (was: Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not)

2004-09-04 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Alexander! On Saturday, September 04, 2004, 10:42 AM, you wrote: MB>> ASK> ... the smiley interpreter doesn't interpret anything in ,,, <> This is how it has always been. Take a look at the .msl files in The Bat!/Images. TB! will only call the image as a text replacement for the "handle,

Re: Licence unhappiness?

2004-09-04 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Ben! On Saturday, September 04, 2004, 8:02 AM, you wrote: Allie>> But please, I'm personally really getting tired of the Allie>> comments about smilies and new icons as if they comprise a Allie>> HUGE coding effort that could have been channeled elsewhere, Allie>> or that they comprise a si

Re: No more colons (was: Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not)

2004-09-04 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Andre! On Saturday, September 04, 2004, 8:29 AM, you wrote: MB>> :grin: Okay. < > 4 * * 1 MB>> But, Andre, I use *asterisks* to indicate emphasis, AW> I don't. And for exactly for that reason. If I need to show AW> emphasis which is seldom enough i use underscores. Well, I think I had

Re: MORE version questions

2004-09-03 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Rich! On Wednesday, September 01, 2004, 10:56 AM, you wrote: rg> 1) Anyone care to comment ... Well, I'll give it a try. Each person's needs and "compelling reasons" are different. It depends on what you want. I have run v. 2.12.00 and liked it very much, except for an unstable folder prob

Re: Upgrading

2004-09-03 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Miguel! On Friday, September 03, 2004, 6:54 PM, you wrote: MB>> Ah, a man of mystery with his own secret methods!! M> I don't want anyone to take the risks I'm taking ;-) I know. I just like to tease you a bit. I know you are working hard to get the New Filter System bug-free and the best

Re: Upgrading

2004-09-03 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Miguel! On Friday, September 03, 2004, 6:33 PM, you wrote: MB>> I read about that on tbbeta... M> I think it's a little different :) Ah, a man of mystery with his own secret methods!! That other way that I read about involved partitioning and new drives and all sorts of major operations,

Re: Upgrading

2004-09-03 Thread Mary Bull
Hello MAU! On Friday, September 03, 2004, 5:42 PM, you wrote: LJ>>> I actually went back to 2.12 and then forward again to 3.0. MB>> This experience of yours should be quite reassuring to those who MB>> have been asking if it's possible. Thanks for posting it. M> It is actually even possible to

Re: Upgrading

2004-09-03 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Lawrence! On Friday, September 03, 2004, 4:56 PM, you wrote: LJ> I actually went back to 2.12 and then forward again to 3.0. This experience of yours should be quite reassuring to those who have been asking if it's possible. Thanks for posting it. -- Best regards, Mary The Bat! 3.0 on Wi

Re: .msl file format

2004-09-03 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Alexander! On Friday, September 03, 2004, 4:42 PM, you wrote: ASK> is the .msl format for the smiley description explained ASK> somewhere? Not so far as I know. It's 9Val's original design--he's one of the developers at RITLabs. He did it in his spare time and the others decided to incorpo

Re: Licence unhappiness?

2004-09-03 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Bryan! On Friday, September 03, 2004, 10:48 AM, you wrote: BA> Butwhat has happened? I buy the software, install it and sign BA> up to the mailing list only to discover dissent in the BA> rankswhat is the score with the licence and why are so many BA> people unhapy with the new vers

Re: No more colons (was: Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not)

2004-09-03 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Eric! On Friday, September 03, 2004, 1:38 PM, you wrote: MB>>> Let's see how many would truly prefer a change from MB>>> colon enclosures, and I'll get back to you. ASK>> Count me in as a pointed-bracket-preferer. :) E> And me. So that's: 5 for pointed-brackets, or angle-brackets, < >

Re: Upgrading

2004-09-03 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Roelof! On Friday, September 03, 2004, 1:03 PM, you wrote: MB>>> I don't know whether an install of v. 2.12.00 over v. 3.0 would MB>>> work. MAU>> Yes, it will. RO> Will it install over v4 too? :rofl2: And over budgies and bunnies and Moderators, no doubt!! Just be sure not to lose the ke

Re: Upgrading

2004-09-03 Thread Mary Bull
Hello MAU! On Friday, September 03, 2004, 12:46 PM, you wrote: MB>> I don't know whether an install of v. 2.12.00 over v. 3.0 would MB>> work. M> Yes, it will. Oh, what good news!! I hope Pat J. will see this from you. We owe you a beer *and* a coffee! -- Best regards, Mary The Bat! 3.0 on Wi

Re: Jumpy Mail Ticker

2004-09-03 Thread Mary Bull
Hello 9Val! On Friday, September 03, 2004, 12:48 PM, you wrote: MB>> ... why the mail ticker is still jumping? 9> Heh, problem is that I tried to reproduce it not once, but failed I read that series of posts on tbbeta. Sorry that it's not reproducible and appreciate your efforts. < ... > MB>>

Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not

2004-09-03 Thread Mary Bull
Hello 9Val! On Friday, September 03, 2004, 12:48 PM, you wrote: MB>> Yes. But with the smiley interpreter on, the handles without MB>> colons in the default.msl can be startling, and I see that 9Val MB>> has still not had time to edit them. 9> Hmm, quite strange, I've deleted I am so glad to he

Re: Upgrading

2004-09-03 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Barry! On Friday, September 03, 2004, 11:29 AM, you wrote: BJ> ... not yet recieved my new key ,,, < ... > BJ>>> I can wait untill the morning now, ... MB>> ... Let us know how it goes ... ... BJ> Well my key arrived by the time i'd got up for work and V3 BJ> installed with no problem

Re: Upgrading

2004-09-03 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Pat! On Friday, September 03, 2004, 9:49 AM, you wrote: PJ> I'm probably not the only one confused about TB!v3.0 and whether or PJ> not to upgrade, but I think I would like to take it for a test PJ> drive... but forget (one of many senior moments) how to install a PJ> trial version while le

Re: The Bat! v. 3.0

2004-09-03 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Michael! On Friday, September 03, 2004, 11:22 AM, you wrote: MB>> ... RITLabs seems to have embarked on a new marketing push, to MB>> get TB! more widely known. MLW> I have no problem with true, honest marketing. I wish RitLabs MLW> would try that. ... I think a lot of advice has been sen

Re: PC Smiley site down?

2004-09-03 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Michael! On Friday, September 03, 2004, 11:51 AM, you wrote: MLW> Is the PC Smiley site down? I just tried, and I can't access it. Very likely a server problem, unless it's a New Mexico power outage. -- Best regards, Mary The Bat! 3.0 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2 _

Re: No more colons

2004-09-03 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Marck! On Friday, September 03, 2004, 11:26 AM, you wrote: MB>> ... I want to do what best pleases both those who use the Smileys MB>> feature and those who read the mails in PTV of the ones using MB>> them, if the two goals don't turn out to be mutually exclusive. :) MDP> You know, I'm ac

Re: No more colons

2004-09-03 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Marck! On Friday, September 03, 2004, 10:52 AM, you wrote: TF>>> I understand Allen's caveat about HTML tags, MDP> It's actually a bit more than a caveat. It's a potential show MDP> stopper. If smilies are embedded in an HTML message, any HTML MDP> viewer (non-TB) will simply choke on the

Re: No more colons (was: Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not)

2004-09-03 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Andre! On Friday, September 03, 2004, 10:49 AM, you wrote: MB>> Therefore, if it's okay, let's have a poll: MB>> 1) For Smiley handles enclosed in colons : : MB>> 2) For Smiley handles enclosed in brackets < > AW> I vote for * * :p :grin: Okay. < > 4 * * 1 But, Andre, I use *asteris

Re: No more colons (was: Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not)

2004-09-03 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Alexander! On Friday, September 03, 2004, 10:33 AM, you wrote: ASK> Count me in as a pointed-bracket-preferer. :) Okay, that puts the count at 4. Thanks a bunch for your response. :) -- Best regards, Mary The Bat! 3.0 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2 __

Re: No more colons (was: Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not)

2004-09-03 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Allen! On Friday, September 03, 2004, 10:00 AM, you wrote: AD>>> As for :: v. <>, I really don't care either way. ... MB>> That was the impression I had in regard to many who are using MB>> Plain Text View, when the discussion took place on tbbeta. AD> Right--from plain-text side,

Re: No more colons (was: Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not)

2004-09-03 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Thomas! On Friday, September 03, 2004, 9:24 AM, you wrote: MB>> 2) For Smiley handles enclosed in brackets < > TF> I would like this better. Okay, including Roelof, this makes 2 openly expressing this preference so far. Thanks so much for responding. TF> I understand Allen's caveat abo

Re: The Bat! v. 3.0

2004-09-03 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Allen! On Friday, September 03, 2004, 8:50 AM, you wrote: MB>> I read every message listing, as to sender, subject, and size, MB>> and do my own Selective Download, even when there are 700 mails MB>> to look at. AD> You -really- ought to look into the new filter system. Might be AD> good f

Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not

2004-09-03 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Mic! On Friday, September 03, 2004, 8:35 AM, you wrote: Mary>> I hope that 9Val will soon edit the default.msl file to enclose Mary>> all handles in colons there. MicCullen> No offence to anyone, but I'd prefer they fixed bugs rather MicCullen> than play with toys that aren't much use in t

Re: No more colons (was: Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not)

2004-09-03 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Allen! On Friday, September 03, 2004, 8:43 AM, you wrote: MB>> As "Keeper of the Smileys," I can easily edit every handle of the MB>> PCWize Smileys "Smileys" page to have a brackets (< >) enclosure MB>> rather than a colons enclosure. It would be a bit time-consuming, MB>> but I can do tha

Re: The Bat! v. 3.0

2004-09-03 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Alexander! On Friday, September 03, 2004, 7:02 AM, you wrote: MB>> Everything went with great ease. My filters are working MB>> perfectly. My big screen likes the icons. I am still smitten MB>> with, and no doubt permanently in love with, The Bat! < ... > ASK> Do you feel, now that you ha

Re: No more colons (was: Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not)

2004-09-03 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Roelof! On Friday, September 03, 2004, 7:48 AM, you wrote: MB>> This is the reason that all the handles on the Smileys page are MB>> enclosed in colons. I hope that 9Val will soon edit the MB>> default.msl file to enclose all handles in colons there. RO> Oh no, not colons, I'd prefer <> (d

Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not

2004-09-03 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Alexander! On Friday, September 03, 2004, 2:35 AM, you wrote: ASK>>> I heard that characters like ":" and "-" and ")" (and their ASK>>> relatives) actually do like the freedom of imagination they ASK>>> leave on the user side, rather than being pressed into a ASK>>> graphical image. Stop th

Re: Upgrading

2004-09-02 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Barry! On Thursday, September 02, 2004, 7:59 PM, you wrote: BJ>>> ve not yet recieved my new key but i'll follow your advice thanks. MB>> From what site did you purchase v. 3.0? Chicago has been late with MB>> some keys. BJ> I got it from http://www.ritlabs.com/en/ BJ> I can wait untill

Re: Upgrading

2004-09-02 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Barry! On Thursday, September 02, 2004, 7:48 PM, you wrote: BJ> ve not yet recieved my new key but i'll follow your advice thanks. From what site did you purchase v. 3.0? Chicago has been late with some keys. -- Best regards, Mary :Mary: The Bat! 3.0 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack

Re: Upgrading

2004-09-02 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Barry! On Thursday, September 02, 2004, 7:18 PM, you wrote: BJ> Is it best to do a fresh install of version 3.. then apply my BJ> backup RITLabs strongly advises on its website to install right over the previous version. I've done this for every update I've made since v. 1.61, and the new

Jumpy Mail Ticker

2004-09-02 Thread Mary Bull
Hello 9Val! It was truly comforting to me to read your response to Miguel on tbudl in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] , where you said, among a lot of other great things: 9> ... As you probably know, in most cases every evening I make a 9> daily build for internal testing ... So, if building and testing

Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not

2004-09-02 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Alexander! On Thursday, September 02, 2004, 1:07 PM, you wrote: MAU>> I appreciate the beer, but please don't force me to make MAU>> comments about smileys ;-) ASK> I heard that characters like ":" and "-" and ")" (and their ASK> relatives) actually do like the freedom of imagination they

Re: The Bat! v. 3.0

2004-09-02 Thread Mary Bull
Hello A.Translator! On Thursday, September 02, 2004, 2:19 PM, you wrote: MB>> I've been using v. 3.0 for almost 3 hours now, and so far, I'm MB>> extremely pleased. AT> Could you tell me why? I am not trying to be ironic, just would AT> like to know why I should upgrade. Sorry to be late answer

Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not

2004-09-02 Thread Mary Bull
Hello MAU! On Thursday, September 02, 2004, 1:23 PM, you wrote: M> In Spain we say: "A monkey dressed in silk is still a monkey". I like that. MB>> It's marketing. The company has to live, financially. I'm happy to MB>> support them, and so far they have given very fine support to me. M> As I

Re: The Bat! v. 3.0

2004-09-02 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Jurgen! On Thursday, September 02, 2004, 1:01 PM, you wrote: MB>> I do hope that in the future those making the decisions will find ways MB>> to keep the beta-testers (to whom I myself am forever grateful) better MB>> informed and happier. JH> you know I really pity the programmers, becaus

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >