Hello Miguel,
On Friday, May 20, 2022 you wrote:
M> Hello Jack,
>> Then I went into account properties and looked at the forward
>> template. I noticed the "Forward messages as attachments (MIME
>> Standard)" was ticked.
M> That was certainly your original problem for not seeing pictures as
M>
Hello Jack,
> Then I went into account properties and looked at the forward
> template. I noticed the "Forward messages as attachments (MIME
> Standard)" was ticked.
That was certainly your original problem for not seeing pictures as
attachments when forwarding. The forwarded message is attached
no idea why your attachments aren't forwarded. All I can do is
M> volunteer to investigate. When you run into that problem again with a
M> new email, if you don't mind, please forward it to me by PM, as a MIME
M> attachment (remember the option in the FWD template), so it wil
o investigate. When you run into that problem again with a
new email, if you don't mind, please forward it to me by PM, as a MIME
attachment (remember the option in the FWD template), so it will
include everything, and I will take a look to see if I find anything
"special" in the m
orward will be included as an .eml
M> MIME attachment, and the text of the message (the one you are creating,
M> will depend on your Forward template for the account or folder you are
M> selecting. If you untick that box, there will be no .eml attachment,
M> just the text created by
Hello Jack,
> I'm going to try it with that box ticked as soon as I find a good
> specimen to forward.
That is not your problem. If you tick that box what will happen is
that any message that you want to forward will be included as an .eml
MIME attachment, and the text of the messa
Hello Thomas,
On Saturday, May 14, 2022 you wrote:
TFM> Hello Jack,
TFM> On Sat, 14 May 2022 10:27:36 -0500 GMT (14/05/2022, 22:27 +0700 GMT),
TFM> Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
>> If I *forward* a message which contains pictures as attachments, the pictures
>> don't get forwarded. If on the other hand
Hello Jack,
On Sat, 14 May 2022 10:27:36 -0500 GMT (14/05/2022, 22:27 +0700 GMT),
Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
> If I *forward* a message which contains pictures as attachments, the pictures
> don't get forwarded. If on the other hand I *redirect* that same message, the
> pictures are redirected along w
Hello TBUDL'ers,
If I *forward* a message which contains pictures as attachments, the pictures
don't get forwarded. If on the other hand I *redirect* that same message, the
pictures are redirected along with the message.
Is there an option somewhere or am I just not understanding the difference
b
Hello Ira,
Saturday, June 24, 2017, 6:36:15 AM, you wrote:
> When I forward a massage and only want to reference one line,
> the bat always automatically adds an attachment containing the
> whole forwarded email. How do I turn that feature off?
Not a beta issue, so I am copying
Hi
On Monday 24 October 2016 at 9:13:03 AM, in
,
Tony Brookes wrote:-
> Dwight, Outlook (recent versions) have that
> functionality.
TB! can check on attachments with a filter on outgoing messages.
Something like:-
Message (attributes)is not with attachments
And
On Sunday, October 23, 2016, 10:31:38 AM, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
>> No, there isn't. If you don't attach anything, TB! cannot know that
>> you wanted to.
>Don't recall which one, but I've set up a client which noticed if you used the
> word attach o
On Sunday, October 23, 2016, 10:31:38 AM, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
> No, there isn't. If you don't attach anything, TB! cannot know that
> you wanted to.
Don't recall which one, but I've set up a client which noticed if you used
the word attach or attachment in
Hello Tom,
On Thu, 20 Oct 2016 13:09:45 +1100 GMT (20-Oct-16, 09:09 +0700 GMT),
Tom wrote:
> Just wondering if there is a setting to have TB check on attachments
> before sending it and warn if necessary - in case I miss actually
> attaching it before
> clicking the send button.
No, th
Hello Everyone,
Just wondering if there is a setting to have TB check on attachments
before sending it and warn if necessary - in case I miss actually
attaching it before
clicking the send button.
--
Best regards,
Tom
using TheBat! 4.2.33.9 on Win 7Prof, 64bit
Hi,
Saturday, May 18, 2013, 2:55:20 PM,jlar...@charter.net wrote:
> Are you familiar with Picasa? You select the pictures you want to send
Not personally, but I've heard of it.
I'll go take a look! Thanks!
--
Best regards,
Susannemailto:sisk...@gmail.com
Using
Hello Susanne,
Friday, May 17, 2013, 9:05:03 PM, you wrote:
S> Friday, May 17, 2013, 1:01:39 PM,rg...@grunwalds.com wrote:
>> Not that I know of. You must resize the pics outside of The Bat
>> before you attach them.
S> Thought so, but was hoping I had overlooked an option!
S> Thank you!
Are
Friday, May 17, 2013, 1:01:39 PM,rg...@grunwalds.com wrote:
> Not that I know of. You must resize the pics outside of The Bat
> before you attach them.
Thought so, but was hoping I had overlooked an option!
Thank you!
--
Best regards,
Susannemailto:sisk...@gmail.
Not that I know of. You must resize the pics outside of The Bat before you
attach them. You can make the inline graphics appear smaller by dragging the
edges, but that doesn't change the file size. If you use windows to send them,
you can make it resize them at that time
--
Rick
If all the nat
Is there something in the settings to control this?
--
Best regards,
Susannemailto:sisk...@gmail.com
Using The Bat! 4.2.6
OS: Windows 7 6.1 Build 7601 Service Pack 1
Current version is 5.2.2 | 'Using TBUDL' info
I throw in something here. I have mine set up to forward the message as is (not
as an attachment), yet with certain people, it acts the opposite of "as usual":
if I forward normally I get an attached message and must use the shift+alt+F5
to get them to go correctly.
--
Rick
A
Hello Adrian,
> I think I've cracked it.
>
> Specials/Alternative Forward Shift+Alt+F5 looks as if will do the
> job.
Well, what Shift+Alt+F5 does here is send the whole original message as
a .eml attachment. Something I very rarely use.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. U
Hello MAU,
Sunday, October 7, 2012, 10:18:31 PM, you wrote:
> Hello Adrian,
>>> Are you by any chance keeping your attachments in a separate directory?
>>> See Account/Properties/Files & directories.
>>
>> No. "Keep attachment files in message body&quo
Hello Adrian,
>> Are you by any chance keeping your attachments in a separate directory?
>> See Account/Properties/Files & directories.
>
> No. "Keep attachment files in message body"
Well, sorry but I can't think of anything else for the moment.
--
Best r
Hello MAU,
Sunday, October 7, 2012, 6:02:43 PM, you wrote:
> Are you by any chance keeping your attachments in a separate directory?
> See Account/Properties/Files & directories.
No. "Keep attachment files in message body"
--
Best regards,
Adrian
Hello Adrian,
>> Not sure what you are doing differently from me.
>
>
> With the message sender, recipient, subject highlighted:
> Either Message/Forward or shift-F5
Are you by any chance keeping your attachments in a separate directory?
See Account/Properties/Files & directories.
--
Best
Hello Thomas,
Sunday, October 7, 2012, 11:52:13 AM, you wrote:
> Not sure what you are doing differently from me.
With the message sender, recipient, subject highlighted:
Either Message/Forward or shift-F5
--
Best regards,
Adrianmailto:adr...@morant.co.uk
__
Hello Adrian,
Sunday, October 7, 2012, 4:34:25 PM, you wrote:
AJM> Is there a way to forward a message complete with its attachment(s)
Why, yes. When I forward messages, the attachments are always there.
Sometimes I have to manually delete them if I don't want to forward
them...
Hello Tbudl,
Is there a way to forward a message complete with its attachment(s)
--
Best regards,
Adrian mailto:adr...@morant.co.uk
Current version is 4.2.42 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silver
Hello MAU,
Friday, April 20, 2012, 4:03:19 AM, you wrote:
>> I would think he hit a wrong ctrl-key but I wouldn't know which one.
>> Plus, since when do crtl-keys change the drop-down menues?
M> Are you sure that your friend, or someone else, hasn't been fiddling
M> with Customiser? My suggestio
Hello Thomas,
> I would think he hit a wrong ctrl-key but I wouldn't know which one.
> Plus, since when do crtl-keys change the drop-down menues?
Are you sure that your friend, or someone else, hasn't been fiddling
with Customiser? My suggestion would be to exit TB, delete 'tbuser.def'
file (aft
.x decided last week to change that to: "Hide on
button", "Hide in Pane", "Hide". And that is exactly what his TB!
does, he cannot make the attachment icons visible in the pane any
more. They are hidden somewhere, and changing the "place" where they
are hidden
Hello Abigail,
Thursday, August 11, 2011, 7:10:31 PM, you wrote:
AM> I don't think that would be a good fit for my needs -- it would make it a
AM> lot harder for me to locate and find documents over time.
Not with Archivarius 3000... The only problem with the combination
TB!/Archivarius is t
>
> As I read Abigail's message, only one message that referred to the
> attachment existed before the backup, and afterwards there were five more
> but still only one message referring to it. The creation of the five
> superfluous copies certainly sounds like a big to me,
On Thursday, August 11, 2011, at 3:20:51 AM, Marck Pearlstone wrote:
AM>> Obviously this a a bug and not a feature.
> Not so. This is entirely predicted, predictable and required behaviour.
As I read Abigail's message, only one message that referred to the
attachment existed bef
ts.
...
AM> Obviously this a a bug and not a feature.
Not so. This is entirely predicted, predictable and required behaviour.
AM> So what is causing this
If you have multiple messages that refer to the same attachment,
each message MUST have its own copy of that attachment so that, when
message
t created a 2nd
copy of the file -- so I had:
newfile.pdf
newfile1.pdf
Then, within TheBat, I deleted the attachment from my "sent" mail, returning
me to a single file.
Then my backup ran. I have changed backup settings so that attachments
should NOT be backed up.
Nonethless..
ather annoying.
But since my work involves receiving and transmitting a lot of stuff
this means that the attachment folder can grow geometrically, very quickly.
I don't know if there is a fix for this, but I sure wish there were. (For me
it means that I will really have to change my
Hello Bat users,
I'm unable to find a report in bugtracker for this error, but it
has existed for several years and is still present in 5.0.12 ...
,- [ Extract from : thebat_Exceptions.log ]
| Date: 13 May 2011 07:39:05
| OS: Windows XP Service Pack 3 build 2600
| Address: 00C1B3EF
| Cl
MATCH='%_COMMENT'
%_COMMENT='%SETPATTREGEXP=@(?i)^.*?,\s*(.*)\...@%regexpmatch=&%_comment&'%Qt='Oattachments_one_per_line_2'":"%_COMMENT%-
%_COMMENT=''"%-
= Ends
The third line of the above 4 lines will wrap.
>
Hi
On Wednesday 8 July 2009 at 5:32:23 AM, in
, Ian A. White wrote:
> G'day Robin,
> On Wednesday, July 8, 2009, at 1:31:30 PM, you (Robin
> Anson) wrote:
RA>> Create a Quick Template called AttList as follows
RA>> %If:"%_FirstTime"="":#%- %%_FirstTime="No"%-
RA>> %%If:"%Attachments"=
Dear List,
RA>> Create a Quick Template called AttList as follows
>
RA>> %If:"%_FirstTime"="":#%-
RA>> %%_FirstTime="No"%-
RA>> %%If:"%Attachments"="":"%-
RA>> %_":"%-
RA>> %_%-Attachments:
RA>> %_%_Att_List='%Attachments,'%-
RA>> %_%Qinclude(AttList)"#:#%-
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 at 14:32:23 +1000, Ian wrote:
> G'day Robin,
>
> On Wednesday, July 8, 2009, at 1:31:30 PM, you (Robin Anson) wrote:
>
RA>> Create a Quick Template called AttList as follows
>
RA>> %If:"%_FirstTime"="":#%-
RA>> %%_FirstTime="No"%-
RA>> %%If:"%Attachments"="":"%-
RA>> %___
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 at 03:28:23 +0100, MFPA wrote:
> On Wednesday 8 July 2009 at 2:14:18 AM, in
> , Ian A. White wrote:
>> I use the %ATTACHMENTS macro to list the attachments I
>> send in an e-mail to make sure that the recipient gets
>> them all, however the attached filenames all appear on
>> a
Hi
On Wednesday 8 July 2009 at 2:14:18 AM, in
, Ian A. White wrote:
> I use the %ATTACHMENTS macro to list the attachments I
> send in an e-mail to make sure that the recipient gets
> them all, however the attached filenames all appear on
> a line wrapped. With filenames allowed to have spac
Tuesday, October 21, 2008, 9:11:49 PM, you wrote:
> Deleting a message means that it's marked as deleted and doesn't show
> anymore (unless you choose Folder -> Browse deleted messages) even
> when a message shows in trash, it's still present in the original
> folder. Same thing goes for messages
> Still I am wondering about the treatment of this attachment. I have
> deleted the email, so it now appears in trash. Via right-click I have
> deleted the attachment - now I am wondering where is it gone? Does it
> still "slumber" somewhere in the database and just does no
Hallo Tom,
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:56:00 +1100GMT (21-10-2008, 7:56 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
T> Still I am wondering about the treatment of this attachment. I have
T> deleted the email, so it now appears in trash. Via right-click I have
T> deleted the attachment - now I am wonder
Hello Everyone,
just received an email (spam) with an attachment (supposedly jpg). I
am viewing emails in this account as txt and do not open such
attachments.
Still I am wondering about the treatment of this attachment. I have
deleted the email, so it now appears in trash. Via right-click I
Hello Peter,
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 19:46:34 -0500 GMT (20/02/2008, 07:46 +0700 GMT),
Peter Kerekes wrote:
>>> Sometimes I am getting an e-mail with attachments, where the attachment
>>> is actually in the e-mail itself.
>>> I tried to get this a number of ways u
Hello Rick,
Tuesday, February 19, 2008, 5:20:19 PM, you wrote:
>> Hello Tbudl,
>> Sometimes I am getting an e-mail with attachments, where the attachment
>> is actually in the e-mail itself.
>> I tried to get this a number of ways unsuccessfully. How can I d
> Hello Tbudl,
> Sometimes I am getting an e-mail with attachments, where the attachment
> is actually in the e-mail itself.
> I tried to get this a number of ways unsuccessfully. How can I do it?
> I tried with MicroEd with HTML but could not make it.
> Wo
Hello Tbudl,
Sometimes I am getting an e-mail with attachments, where the attachment
is actually in the e-mail itself.
I tried to get this a number of ways unsuccessfully. How can I do it?
I tried with MicroEd with HTML but could not make it.
Would appreciate any suggestions
Hi Marek,
On Thursday, January 24, 2008 at 11:20:04 AM you wrote:
M> yes, it was requested by many users to have teporary files opened in temp as
read
M> only, because users edited this temporary file and lost changes, when
M> closed editor
Ah, pity there's no option.
M> Frankly, it is easy
Hello all,
Thursday, January 24, 2008, Maggie Meister wrote:
> When opening an rtf or doc attachment, I notice it is opened read-only.
> Is there somewhere a preference I'm missing to set this to never open as
> read-only?
> Please don't tell me this is a feature! :-(
Hello Bats,
When opening an rtf or doc attachment, I notice it is opened read-only.
Is there somewhere a preference I'm missing to set this to never open as
read-only?
Please don't tell me this is a feature! :-(
--
Best regards,
Maggie
>>> I would prefer to save all attachments to a central location on my
>>> harddrive (ie outside of the TB) hoping that this will reduce the
>>> file size within TB.
One further follow-up query:
I noticed that this attachment saving works fine but in the target
fo
hen you are reading mail, it does not
> look any different.
Thanks - this is clear now and it works as you explained. One follow
up observation:
If my preferred location for saving the attachment is on a networked
drive and this pc is not active at the time, it appears that the email
gets thr
he Help file and changed the setting. However with
> my test email I noticed that while the attachment was indeed saved
> elsewhere, the email still showed the attachment (as existing and
> picture). Is this normal and perhaps my misunderstanding? I assumed
> I might only have a tx
Help file and changed the setting. However with my
test email I noticed that while the attachment was indeed saved
elsewhere, the email still showed the attachment (as existing and
picture). Is this normal and perhaps my misunderstanding? I assumed I
might only have a txt reference to the split
Hi Dave,
on Sun, 16 Sep 2007 15:56:21 +1000GMT (16.09.2007, 07:56 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:
DC> My question revolves around the new mail in TB and those file
DC> attaches; Does TB store them in a new directory as a result of the
DC> import process ?In other words, all links to Outlook are g
Hello Everybody,
As a new chum to version 3.99.24 I have now safely imported all my
mail folders from Outlook, and Contacts, but I'm wondering where all
these new files are stored.
One particular folder in Outlook had many file attaches, all of which
I still want linked to the messages.
My quest
Thomas Fernandez formuleerde de vraag :
I'm sorry I cannot offer a ready solution
Thanks for trying anyway.
--
Regards,
Adriana.
[ put out the rubbish if you need to reach me by e-mail ]
www.spinsister.nl
Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using
Hello A.Translator,
On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 13:23:28 +0100 GMT (12/11/2006, 19:23 +0700 GMT),
A.Translator wrote:
AT> I have been using TB! for years and never had any serious problems until
now:
AT> I cannot attach and image or doc file to an email by using MicroEd and
browsing
AT> to the file, si
Hello A.Translator,
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 17:20:41 +0100 GMT (14/11/2006, 23:20 +0700 GMT),
A.Translator wrote:
>> I had this problem many years ago. It was a registry entry in Chinese
>> Windows 98 that I had to change, and the problem was fixed.
>> I wonder whether you have installed any new sof
Thomas Fernandez schreef op 14-11-2006 :
I had this problem many years ago. It was a registry entry in Chinese
Windows 98 that I had to change, and the problem was fixed.
I wonder whether you have installed any new software that changed
something in the registry prior to the problem ocurring f
Benedict Allen plaatste dit op zijn scherm :
What happens when you set the file type to all files? Try the shortcut
alt+pg up.
Same thing: only folder are shown, no files.
--
Regards,
Adriana.
[ put out the rubbish if you need to reach me by e-mail ]
www.spinsister.nl
_
Howdy A.Translator,
Sunday, November 12, 2006, 12:23:28 PM, A.Translator wrotened:
AT> I have been using TB! for years and never had any serious problems until
now:
AT> I cannot attach and image or doc file to an email by using MicroEd and
browsing
AT> to the file, simply because the files are
I have been using TB! for years and never had any serious problems until now:
I cannot attach and image or doc file to an email by using MicroEd and browsing
to the file, simply because the files are not shown. The file format is
suddenly *.zap on default, but even when U change that to say *.gi
Hello Elodie Trouche-Perrin & everyone else,
on 21-Jul-2006 at 18:37 you (Elodie Trouche-Perrin) wrote:
> I sent an email with jpegs attached. It left my outbox ok with size
> around 2000 kbytes. The recipient received my email with all jpegs
> attached with their right size, but when i look at m
Hello TBUDL,
I sent an email with jpegs attached. It left my outbox ok with size
around 2000 kbytes. The recipient received my email with all jpegs
attached with their right size, but when i look at my send box, the jpeg are at
0 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
how it is possible!?
Elodie
Elodie Trouche-Per
ON Wednesday, May 31, 2006, 9:00:54 AM, you wrote:
PM> Hi Gerard,
PM> Tuesday, May 30, 2006, 10:11:07 PM, you wrote:
>> I recently upgraded to version 3.80.06 and found that my filters that auto
>> forward some received msgŽs leave out the attachment. Before you ask, no I
&
Hi Gerard,
Tuesday, May 30, 2006, 10:11:07 PM, you wrote:
> I recently upgraded to version 3.80.06 and found that my filters that auto
> forward some received msgŽs leave out the attachment. Before you ask, no I
> do not have that option active in the filter :)
I have a similar pro
Hi Bat Users,
I recently upgraded to version 3.80.06 and found that my filters that auto
forward some received msgŽs leave out the attachment. Before you ask, no I
do not have that option active in the filter :)
Is this a know problem, because I did see some other forwarding problems
mentioned
Hello Philippe,
On Tue, 23 May 2006 23:02:27 +0200 GMT (24/05/2006, 04:02 +0700 GMT),
Philippe Macaire wrote:
PM> I noticed that sometimes the icons showing in the attachment pane do
PM> not match the corresponding file type. For instance (see attached
PM> image), an EML file is shown w
Hi all,
I noticed that sometimes the icons showing in the attachment pane do
not match the corresponding file type. For instance (see attached
image), an EML file is shown with an MS Project icon. In some rare
occasions it does not show at all.
I suspected my Windows XP SP2 to be corrupted in
Hi Cory,
on Thu, 04 May 2006 13:40:28 +0200GMT (04.05.2006, 13:40 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:
C> Could someone tell me if the format of forwarded attachments can be
C> changed? My 3.80.03 creates the original message as attachment 1.EML,
C> and from the errors I get returned I guess S
Hi 'Batters!
Could someone tell me if the format of forwarded attachments can be
changed? My 3.80.03 creates the original message as attachment 1.EML,
and from the errors I get returned I guess SpamCop is unable to work
with that format and needs .MSG.
BTW SpamCop reports "headers not f
Reply to message sent 4/22/2006, @ 09:15:59 (2:15 AM Locally)
~~~
Hello Fredrik,
> If you store the attachments in a separate directory
I'm running Voyager and I don't believe that is an available option.
That's the main reason for my q
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 12:38:34 -0500 GMT, Nick wrote:
> Is there some way to use a filter to delete the attachment after
> sending, but save the message itself?
If you store the attachments in a separate directory then it should
be possible to create a bat-file that will
Hello,
Is there some way to use a filter to delete the attachment after
sending, but save the message itself?
Thanks,
--
ò.ó Nick
Danger
[MUA: TB! Voyager 3.72.03]
[OS: Windows XP 5 1]
Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' i
Dear Jenny,
@30-Jan-2006, 10:39 +0100 (30-Jan 09:39 here) Jenny Zonneveld [JZ] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Bob:
BM Anyone got any idea why The Bat! is sending the extra eml file, and
BM what it is intended to accomplish other than to boost the size of the
BM message? I promised
Hello Bob,
Monday, January 30, 2006, 4:21:05 AM, you wrote:
BM> G'day Marck,
BM> Sunday, January 29, 2006, 7:09:39 PM, you wrote in response to my
BM> question:
BM>>> Anyone got any idea why The Bat! is sending the extra eml file, and
BM>>> what it is intended to accomplish other than to boost t
Dear Bob,
@30-Jan-2006, 13:21 +1000 (30-Jan 03:21 here) Bob Morris [BM] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck:
...
BM>>> Anyone got any idea why The Bat! is sending the extra eml file
...
>> Because you told it to!
BM>
BM> I got an indignant (tongue-in-cheek) response from my brother-in-law
On Sunday, January 29, 2006, 9:21:05 PM, Bob Morris wrote:
> On looking at my own installation I find that all six POP accounts
> have the setting unticked, while my one IMAP account has it ticked.
> It would appear that The Bat! applies different settings depending
> on whether the account is POP
o do all this
experimenting ;-) .
On looking at my own installation I find that all six POP accounts
have the setting unticked, while my one IMAP account has it ticked. It
would appear that The Bat! applies different settings depending on
whether the account is POP or IMAP.
Not a problem as we now kn
ro) you will only send the attachment plus
whatever you type.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.70.06 "Qigong" (Beta)
Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
G'day Marck,
Sunday, January 29, 2006, 7:09:39 PM, you wrote:
> This is a MIME forward aka Alternative forwarding. In this mode, TB
> deliberately attaches a complete copy of the original email. This is
> also the way AOL users forward messages. TB's difference is that it
> attaches the copied
Dear Bob,
@29-Jan-2006, 15:41 +1000 (29-Jan 05:41 here) Bob Morris [BM] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to TBUDL:
...
BM> Anyone got any idea why The Bat! is sending the extra eml file, and
BM> what it is intended to accomplish other than to boost the size of the
BM> message? I promised my B-I-L
e three pics
> below (as did Outlook Express).
>
> I just did the forwarding bit from Outlook Express and from Opera.
> Both forwarded the message as a 140 kb email, with html and 3 x jpeg
> parts...and no *.eml attachment. ie they didn't double up like The
> Bat.
>
>
Hi,
I have my data back and the utility for getting any information from
WINMAIL.DAT files is a utility called WMPARSER. You can do a search on
Google for it. Some of the links it turns up don't go anywhere, so you
might have to try.
--
Regards,
Ian A. White, CPEng
| /| / WAI Engineering
|
On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 at 17:12:08 -0500, Rich wrote:
> The fentun product seems Netscape-centric. Any other ideas how one
> could see inside a winmail.dat file?
>
> (Windows w/ IE browser)
I don't use it with a browser at all. As I recall you can:
* use a command line with a single argument (the
Admin,
On Wednesday, November 16, 2005, 7:53:10 AM, you (Admin at AK) wrote:
AaA> see subject
Actually I had a program that would parse the WINMAIL.DAT file after
it was saved to disk. Unfortunately it is on the hard disk that is
with a data recovery service and my backups were corrupted.
When
Wednesday, November 16, 2005, rich gregory wrote:
> The fentun product seems Netscape-centric. Any other ideas how one
> could see inside a winmail.dat file?
This should work, I think
http://www.mail-archive.com/tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com/msg34347.html
Else, there a few links at
http://dev.kanngar
On Tue, 15 Nov 2005 at 21:22:04 +, Marten wrote:
>> It is probably from someone using Outlook who is writing you in
>> rich-text format. To extract it, try using this free (as in freedom)
>> utility:
>
>> http://tnef.sourceforge.net/
>
> Thanks but that seems to be a Unix thingy - now I know wh
Dear Marten,
@15-Nov-2005, 21:22 Marten Gallagher [MG] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Chris:
MG> BTW your message came through with a part.txt attachment - it was
MG> the TB current version data.
Chris's message was (as is mine) signed with a PGP/MIME signature. The
differenc
> Admin at AK @ 11/15/2005 2:53:10 PM
> "What is winmail.dat file attachment? EOM"
>
>> [What is winmail.dat file attachment?]
> It is probably from someone using Outlook who is writing you in
> rich-text format. To extract it, try using this free (as
Admin at AK @ 11/15/2005 2:53:10 PM
"What is winmail.dat file attachment? EOM"
> [What is winmail.dat file attachment?]
It is probably from someone using Outlook who is writing you in
rich-text format. To extract it, try using this free (as in freedom)
utility:
http://tnef.so
> see subject
Oh dear I should have done what I tell everyone who asks me questions...
google it
Answered - FTWNTK:
Data file added by Outlook when sending in RTF format (i.e: not plain text)
to 'maintain the look and feel of the original message as sent'.
--
Marten Gallagher
Annery Kiln Web
see subject
--
Marten Gallagher
Annery Kiln Web Design
www.annerykiln.co.uk
Using The Bat! 3.62.14
with POPFile 0.22.1
on Windows XP 5.1
Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
1 - 100 of 738 matches
Mail list logo