Hello Feli,
Monday, February 16, 2015, 2:57:33 PM, you wrote:
It's only possible in HTML, there you can choose the image to embed
directly with a button. That works also in templates but can't be done
in plain text.
They come through looking like attachments in TB! After being opened,
TB!
Hello Tbudl,
Does any one know how to embed images so that they don't appear as
attachments and also open up at the far end? Specifically, I'd like to
do it in templates.
Thanks
--
Best regards,
Tony mailto:t...@parkinch.co.uk
The Bat! 5.8.10 with IMAP on Windows
Hello Tony,
On Mon, 16 Feb 2015 13:48:51 +GMT Tony Hoare wrote:
TH Does any one know how to embed images so that they don't appear as
TH attachments and also open up at the far end? Specifically, I'd like to
TH do it in templates.
It's only possible in HTML, there you can choose
Hello Rick,
Saturday, September 14, 2013, 8:18:29 PM, you wrote:
like my logo and Twittter icons to be embedded rather than attached. I'd also
like to be able to attach files occasionally as proper attachments but I have
the images embedded/inline.
You can add it to the template. Change
Hello Forums,
Is it possible to embed images in me outgoing emails. Typically, I'd
like my logo and Twittter icons to be embedded rather than attached.
I'd also like to be able to attach files occasionally as proper
attachments but I have the images embedded/inline.
Cheers
--
Best regards
like my logo and Twittter icons to be embedded rather than attached. I'd also
like to be able to attach files occasionally as proper attachments but I have
the images embedded/inline.
You can add it to the template. Change the mail template to HTML and use the
image icon to add the image
Hello Tony,
On Sat, 14 Sep 2013 15:06:43 +0100 GMT (14-Sep-13, 21:06 +0700 GMT),
Tony Hoare wrote:
Is it possible to embed images in me outgoing emails. Typically, I'd
like my logo and Twittter icons to be embedded rather than attached.
If you mean by template, Rick just replied.
I'd also
Hallo Thomas,
On Sat, 1 Sep 2012 10:56:38 +0700GMT (1-9-2012, 5:56 , where I live),
you wrote:
SA Thus gmail (and Eudora) were relating to the picture as an attachment.
SA This says that int_1.jpg is an attachment.
TF I replied to your mail by embedding a picture, but it was too big for
TF this
Hello Steven,
Monday, August 27, 2012, 6:16:04 AM, you wrote:
SA We researched the question a bit. Here is what we found.
SA When I pasted the pics (using ctrl-v) into TB! I was doing what
SA normally would be giving embedded pictures in the email. However when
SA it was received on the
Hello Steven,
Monday, August 27, 2012, 6:16:04 AM, you wrote:
Content-Type: IMAGE/JPEG; name=int_1.jpg
Content-ID: 4C67E43C.01CD8270.49246F31.44A035FC_csseditor
Content-transfer-encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=int_1.jpg
SA Thus gmail (and Eudora) were relating to
Using The Bat! v5.2 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3
One of the reasons I bought TB! in the first place was that it didn't
retrieve external linked images. This behaviour carried forward to
5.0.34. However, I've just updated to 5.2 and now all external images
appear and I can't find
On 29 August 2012, 21:44, I wrote:
Can someone tell me how to stop TB! downloading external images etc?~~~
Sorry to reply to my own message, but a few minutes after posting, I
discovered the cause of the issue. The 5.2 install had switched from
TB's HTML viewer to system viewer (which I
images.
I am used to using Eudora, which pastes and sends easily, but
sometimes it has garbled the images, especially when more than two
are in one post. By garbled, I mean the 3rd image might show up as
the 2nd image, twice. Others do not report that problem, and that
is an ongoing discussion
Hi,
On this forum, I see some recent discussions about embedding jpeg
image into mass mailing template. I just downloaded TB! yesterday
with the Bits special and I was especially playing with inline images.
I am used to using Eudora, which pastes and sends easily, but
sometimes it has
Mornin' Batties,
In the past I was always able to paste images in
my HTML messages and now am no longer able to do
so. When I CTRL-V to paste the image the cursor
moves to the right one space but the image doesn't
appear. Also, forwarding received messages which
contain images now strips
Hello Rick,
On Saturday, May 26, 2012 you wrote:
Mornin' Batties,
In the past I was always able to paste images in
my HTML messages and now am no longer able to do
so. When I CTRL-V to paste the image the cursor
moves to the right one space but the image doesn't
appear. Also, forwarding
Mornin' Batties,
In the past I was always able to paste images in
my HTML messages and now am no longer able to do
so. When I CTRL-V to paste the image the cursor
moves to the right one space but the image doesn't
appear. Also, forwarding received messages which
contain images now strips
Hallo Rick,
On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 22:26:12 -0400GMT (19-3-2012, 3:26 , where I
live), you wrote:
Is it possible for TB to include online images in a html message?
RG Roelof - I have all the graphics turned on and am working in graphics
RG all day long. I have yet to find either a way to link
RG Roelof - I have all the graphics turned on and am working in graphics
RG all day long. I have yet to find either a way to link to web graphics
RG nor a way to forward something WITH web linked graphics successfully
I was afraid of that, but I wondered whether it was something I
Hallo TBUDL,
Is it possible for TB to include online images in a html message?
--
Groetjes, Roelof
Moderator (n): see god, dictator, egoist, oppressor.
http://www.voormijalleen.nl/
The Bat! 5.0.36.3 (BETA)
Windows Vista 6.0 Build 6002 Service Pack 2
5 pop3 accounts, 3 imap account
OTFE
Is it possible for TB to include online images in a html message?
Roelof - I have all the graphics turned on and am working in graphics
all day long. I have yet to find either a way to link to web graphics
nor a way to forward something WITH web linked graphics successfully
Is it time
Hello
Can TB! accommodate in-line images within an e-mail? If so, how can
this be done? Thanks for any advice.
--
Best regards,
Chew Yoke Lim mailto:ylche...@gmail.com
Current version is 4.2.23 | 'Using TBUDL
Hello
Can TB! accommodate in-line images within an e-mail? If so, how can
this be done? Thanks for any advice.
In an HTML message it is UTILITIES / INSERT / INSERT IMAGE
There is also a handy icon to do it quickly on the toolbar
We are in a plain text message so you won't find it in here
Hello buds...
when I try to forward an email that has html and attached images
used in the html... the html ends up in the forwarded messages,
but not the images.
Any idea why? I'm on 3.99.29 educational
Perplexed
--
Best regards,
Laura mailto:[EMAIL
Hello MAU!
On Thursday, January 25, 2007, 8:52 AM, you wrote:
So, I hate to see RitLabs abandon the .msl plus resident icons and
pics in The Bat!/Images feature.
And I think I am not alone in this.
Smiley-image haters are simply more vocal, I think.
There must be other reason. Smiley
Hello Mary,
Perhaps, after all, it is a bug inadvertently introduced into TB!'s
code.
A bug that draws perfect rectangles around smileys? No way :-)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.95.8
Current
Hello MAU!
On Thursday, January 25, 2007, 10:52 AM, you wrote:
Perhaps, after all, it is a bug inadvertently introduced into TB!'s
code.
A bug that draws perfect rectangles around smileys? No way :-)
Smiley text! Not Smiley images!
LOL
--
Best regards,
Mary
The Bat! 3.95.8 on Windows XP
Hello MFPA!
On Monday, June 05, 2006, 7:21 PM, you wrote:
I guess if MFPA later turns out to feel a need for this file, he now
has a way to set it up again. Since he deleted it, on advice from me
and from Alexander. :)
I actually left it there but appended probably not needed to the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hi
On Tuesday 6 June 2006 at 3:35:18 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Mary Bull wrote:
I always did think you were a smart man! :)
Flattery will get you everywhere (-;
- --
Best regards,
MFPA
A closed mouth gathers no foot
Using The Bat! v3.80.06 on
Hello Mary,
Sunday, June 4, 2006, 1:24:02 PM, you wrote:
Understandable. Most of the discussion on TBOT of the files and
folders in Images came as a result of the testing going on there of
the pcwsmiley code Leif was writing. In the process, at some point
he told us we could delete Order Text
Hello Leif!
On Monday, June 05, 2006, 4:04 PM, you wrote:
Understandable. Most of the discussion on TBOT of the files and
folders in Images came as a result of the testing going on there of
the pcwsmiley code Leif was writing. In the process, at some point
he told us we could delete Order
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hi
On Monday 5 June 2006 at 11:10:47 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Mary Bull wrote:
I guess if MFPA later turns out to feel a need for this file, he now
has a way to set it up again. Since he deleted it, on advice from me
and from Alexander. :)
I actually
Leif Gregory @ 2006-6-05 5:04:03 PM
Order.txt file in \Program Files\The Bat!\Images mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Now this is where it gets fuzzy. I don't recall us ever coming up
with a workaround outside of order.txt. So long as you don't have
conflicting handles, order.txt is irrelevant.
Well
Hello MFPA everyone else,
on 04-Jun-2006 at 19:55 you (MFPA) wrote:
Is it still needed?
No, its not needed anymore. You can delete it.
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de)
NP: Rhythmism 4 by Ubar Tmar
(from the 1998 album True)
Hello MFPA!
On Sunday, June 04, 2006, 12:55 PM, you wrote:
Just updating Rogues and looked at the order.txt file at
C:\Program Files\The Bat!\Images. It was last modified 6 months
ago and contains the following:-
C:\DOCUME~1\Mike\LOCALS~1\Temp\The Bat! Setup\images\default.msl
C:\Program
in 2004, I think.
Thanks Mary. I will have missed that as I am not subscribed to TBOT.
There is no line beginning C:/Docume~1 in my The Bat!/Images. I think
you can safely delete both it and Order Text.
And I think you can safely delete the duplicate files .msl.
The lines I quoted were
not subscribed to TBOT.
Understandable. Most of the discussion on TBOT of the files and folders in
Images came as a result of the testing going on there of the pcwsmiley
code Leif was writing. In the process, at some point he told us we
could delete Order Text.
I don't think that was ever mentioned
and not that of a nannying email client to decide
TF whether I want to download the images or not. I want to whitelist
TF Lufthansa. Please do read the wishlist entry. Here it is again:
TF http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=1780
You have my full support on this. I've already express the same
opinion
Hi Thomas and list,
On Friday, September 16, 2005 at 08:45:44 GMT +0700 (which was 03:45
where I live) Thomas Fernandez wrote (at least in parts) and made
these valuable points on the subject of Displaying images in email:
Let's have the same discussion every year.
OK - but don't you think
a beer as well.
LOL! I wouldn't class advocacy of such a feature as anarchy.
During the rocky period of TB! IMAP, I quite enjoyed ThunderBird for
its ability to selectively load images for HTML mail. I had the
feature disabled by default (the recommended way). It's definitely
better than loading
Hello zwjunk,
On Thu, 15 Sep 2005 22:25:54 -0400 GMT (16/09/2005, 09:25 +0700 GMT),
zwjunk wrote:
z Ritlabs (do they even monitor this list) - IT'S REALLY REALLY REALLY getting
z more and more BURDENSOME to use TB as more and more emails are IMPOSSIBLE to
z read without launching the html
to be an
MG option and turned _on_ by default. I prefer the idea in the note that
MG said: Have a marker in an addressbook.
I think we mean the same. The default should be that images are NOT
dowloaded.
MG But I smell a trout announcing a dead horse, so I'd relly like to drop
MG that theme for now.
I
Hello Goncalo,
On Fri, 16 Sep 2005 07:07:39 +0100 GMT (16/09/2005, 13:07 +0700 GMT),
Goncalo Farias wrote:
GF IMHO, people that want something in a specific way should have the
GF chance to turn a switch on to enable it and people that don't want it
GF would just has to leave it off.
images)
And this is good.
rg I meant to say that if you want to turn OFF your protection from
rg downloaded web content, leaving you unprotected from all those HTML
rg images coming in all willy-nilly in your email, you should be able to
rg do that. I am a bit of an anarchist, I suppose
Hello TBUDL,
Could you tell me how to enable the feature in The Bat! so that I can
view images included in the body of emails which are sent to me.
Thanks.
--
Love and Light,
Granvillemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Hello Granville,
On Thu, 15 Sep 2005 15:12:34 +0100 GMT (15/09/2005, 21:12 +0700 GMT),
Granville Cousins wrote:
GC Could you tell me how to enable the feature in The Bat! so that I can
GC view images included in the body of emails which are sent to me.
If the images are included (i.e. sent
Hallo Granville,
On Thu, 15 Sep 2005 15:12:34 +0100GMT (15-9-2005, 16:12 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
GC Hello TBUDL,
moderator
Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not
just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have
instigated this reply. Please
.
Let's have the same discussion every year. Or, instead, please read
the reason in favour of allowing images to be downloaded from the 'net
in the wishlist entry.
rg Should you be able to turn off this protection?
One should not only be able to, it should be turned off by default.
rg I just click
On Thursday, September 15, 2005, 9:45:44 PM, Thomas Fernandez [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
(snip)
TF Let's have the same discussion every year. Or, instead, please read
TF the reason in favour of allowing images to be downloaded from the 'net
TF in the wishlist entry.
(snip)
Ritlabs refusal
Hello Steve!
On Saturday, May 14, 2005, 1:14 PM, you wrote, in part:
now how do I put in one of those smileys everyone is so keen on?
Smileys work from text handles that call images. You cannot view them
in the Edit Mail Message window.
To view them in View Message windows of any kind
Hello Greg Strong everyone else,
on 06-Feb-2005 at 00:19 you (Greg Strong) wrote:
Giving away the IP address of the recipient when reading an HTML mail
with embedded images, providing feedback to spammers that the message
arrived.
H... I cannot see why that is a security risk.
If you
Hello Mary,
On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MB And very well said. My .02 worth is to agree with all your points one
MB hundred per cent!
and I'll just add a very strong me to here but it would have to be an
option.
MB I think that the Smiley capability (also optional of
On Saturday, February 05, 2005 at 10:22:59 PM [GMT -0500], Thomas
Fernandez wrote:
GL That said, you can retrieve the entire message, external images and
GL all, even in 1.62. All you have to do is double-click the icon for the
GL HTML page to open it in your default browser. So, if you want
On Saturday, February 05, 2005 at 10:29:57 PM [GMT -0500], Mary Bull
wrote:
I like to get my ads from Amazon. However, if they sent me an
attachment, I would become quite wary.
Me too. The spammers know about Amazon sending ads and will send
fraudulent material. I get fraudulent stuff a lot
Hello Allie,
On Sun, 6 Feb 2005 06:38:24 -0500 GMT (06/02/2005, 18:38 +0700 GMT),
Allie Martin wrote:
AM The interesting thing too is that if you open the message in your
AM browser, the risks are still there in terms of security and privacy.
Persactly. So I must know what I am doing, otherwise
Hello Thomas,
A reminder of what Thomas Fernandez on TBOT typed on:
Sunday, February 06, 2005 at 04:29:44 GMT +0100
TF TB's user demography will probably have a higher percentage of
TF computer savvy users than most other mailers, yet it nannies the users
TF more. Why is that?
I can't
Hello Greg,
A reminder of what Greg Strong on TBOT typed on:
Sunday, February 06, 2005 at 04:45:40 GMT +0100
GS I've seen this argument on TB lists for years. It seems to be an
GS ideological issue / opinion. Why can't you provide options and keep
GS everybody happy?
Exactly. Not having
Hello Allie!
On Sunday, February 06, 2005, 5:48 AM, you wrote:
I like to get my ads from Amazon. However, if they sent me an
attachment, I would become quite wary.
Me too. The spammers know about Amazon sending ads and will send
fraudulent material. I get fraudulent stuff a lot concerning
Hello Richard!
On Sunday, February 06, 2005, 2:34 AM, you wrote:
Off topic It's a lovely day here, a bit chilly at the momnent, but I'm
off to rake up the last two of the ten beds in the garden. I tend to
take about two hours for each one as there are a lot of stones and I
want to do it
Hello Tony,
On Sun, 6 Feb 2005 12:23:02 + GMT (06/02/2005, 19:23 +0700 GMT),
Tony Boom wrote:
TB Like Thomas said, the users on this list are the elite of email users,
TB maybe a version of TB! just for us with a secret, non documented option
TB for true full blown html ability... Just
Hello Mary!
On Sunday, February 06, 2005, 6:47 AM, you wrote:
Off topic It's a lovely day here, a bit chilly at the momnent, but I'm
off to rake up the last two of the ten beds in the garden. I tend to
take about two hours for each one as there are a lot of stones and I
want to do it well.
On Sun, 6 Feb 2005 at 06:38:24 -0500, Allie Martin wrote:
AM Fernandez wrote:
GL That said, you can retrieve the entire message, external images and
GL all, even in 1.62. All you have to do is double-click the icon for the
GL HTML page to open it in your default browser. So, if you want to
GL
On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 at 21:29:57 -0600, Mary Bull wrote:
M How thoroughly do you filter, so that emails apparently from
M Amazon _cannot_ be spoofed?
There is that... but we have to put a level of trust in someplace...
MB I like to get my ads from Amazon. However, if they sent me an
MB
On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 at 21:29:57 -0600, Mary Bull wrote:
M How thoroughly do you filter, so that emails apparently from
M Amazon _cannot_ be spoofed?
There is that... but we have to put a level of trust in someplace...
MB I like to get my ads from Amazon. However, if they sent me an
MB
Hello David!
On Sunday, February 06, 2005, 10:48 AM, you wrote:
M How thoroughly do you filter, so that emails apparently from
M Amazon _cannot_ be spoofed?
There is that... but we have to put a level of trust in someplace...
MB I like to get my ads from Amazon. However, if they sent me an
MB
On Sun, 6 Feb 2005 at 11:22:51 -0600, Mary Bull wrote:
M How thoroughly do you filter, so that emails apparently from
M Amazon _cannot_ be spoofed?
There is that... but we have to put a level of trust in someplace...
MB I like to get my ads from Amazon. However, if they sent me an
MB
Thomas Fernandez @ 2005-Feb-5 10:18:57 PM
Remote Images in HTML mail? mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
And if I whitelist the LH newsletter and then someone sends me a
webbug from that address (not difficult to fake a From header), it
is *my* risk. People who don't want to take that risk will leave
Hæ!
Saturday, February 5, 2005, 08:09, Jurgen Haug wrote:
This and HTML mail as standard when you start a new mail.
No, sorry, this would let many people go away.
HTML should not be used for emails.
--
Kveðja, Thorvald Neumann | http://www.aesir.de/
| The Bat! v3.0.2.10 Professional K9
Hello Thorvald,
Saturday, February 5, 2005, 9:16:42 AM, you wrote:
Hæ!
Saturday, February 5, 2005, 08:09, Jurgen Haug wrote:
This and HTML mail as standard when you start a new mail.
No, sorry, this would let many people go away.
HTML should not be used for emails.
HTML *is* used for
At 09:16 [GMT+0100] on Saturday February 5 (actual time - 4:16pm on Saturday in
Perth, Western Australia), you wrote:
Saturday, February 5, 2005, 08:09, Jurgen Haug wrote:
This and HTML mail as standard when you start a new mail.
No, sorry, this would let many people go away.
HTML should
Hæ!
Saturday, February 5, 2005, 09:31, Jurgen Haug wrote:
HTML *is* used for eMails.
But this should not be a general habit.
--
Kveðja, Thorvald Neumann | http://www.aesir.de/
| The Bat! v3.0.2.10 Professional K9 v1.28
| Windows 2000 SP4 (v5.0.2195)
Hæ!
Saturday, February 5, 2005, 10:25, Mic Cullen wrote:
Sometimes it's extremely useful. Rarely, but when you need it, you
really need it.
No, sorry. I do not see any sense in using HTML for emails at all.
--
Kveðja, Thorvald Neumann | http://www.aesir.de/
| The Bat! v3.0.2.10 Professional
Hello Thorvald,
Saturday, February 5, 2005, 10:33:53 AM, you wrote:
Saturday, February 5, 2005, 10:25, Mic Cullen wrote:
Sometimes it's extremely useful. Rarely, but when you need it, you
really need it.
No, sorry. I do not see any sense in using HTML for emails at all.
we will see what
At 10:33 [GMT+0100] on Saturday February 5 (actual time - 5:33pm on Saturday in
Perth, Western Australia), you wrote:
Thorvald Saturday, February 5, 2005, 10:25, Mic Cullen wrote:
Sometimes it's extremely useful. Rarely, but when you need it, you
really need it.
Thorvald No, sorry. I do not
Hello Thorvald Neumann everyone else,
on 05-Feb-2005 at 09:16 you (Thorvald Neumann) wrote:
This and HTML mail as standard when you start a new mail.
No, sorry, this would let many people go away.
Should be made configurable. Whats the problem with a switch that defines
the default editor?
Hello Jurgen,
A reminder of what Jurgen Haug on TBOT typed on:
Saturday, February 05, 2005 at 10:46:19 GMT +0100
JH we will see what Ritlabs will do in future.
Can you imagine what TBOT AKA The Cartoon Network would be like if TB!
had full blown html capability?
--
Tony.
The Bat!
Hello Thorvald Neumann everyone else,
on 05-Feb-2005 at 10:33 you (Thorvald Neumann) wrote:
Sometimes it's extremely useful. Rarely, but when you need it, you
really need it.
No, sorry. I do not see any sense in using HTML for emails at all.
Decide whats best for you, and let other people
and almost everywhere HTML mail was a MUST and c) for Ritlabs i
think it would attract a lot more people to TB! than it would scare of those
ASCII-evangelists who have lost touch with reality out there.
Just like in a browser where you have toggles for using ActiveX, JavaScript,
Java, images, popups
Hello Jurgen Haug everyone else,
on 05-Feb-2005 at 11:19 you (Jurgen Haug) wrote:
ASCII-evangelists
LOL!!
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981)
The errors to avoid are those that eliminate opportunities to try
again. -- Lazar Goldberg
Hæ!
Saturday, February 5, 2005, 11:14, Jurgen Haug wrote:
exactly. but for some this is a religious matter, I guess.
No, it is not.
I am fully aware of the security risks of HTML emails. Others are not.
I am quite glad TB does not allow those features to be used.
The people who created
Hæ!
Saturday, February 5, 2005, 10:47, Mic Cullen wrote:
If I send out a weekly schedule to the people I work for/with, being able
to
colour-code the different sports/teams I'm covering that week is
incredibly
useful, so that what I'm doing and for whom and when can be very
Hæ!
Saturday, February 5, 2005, 11:13, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
Decide whats best for you, and let other people decide whats best for
them...
Yes, sure.
But I hate to see TB having the HTML mode on as a default.
Because I am educating my clients to use plain text emails,
preferably with TB
Hæ!
Saturday, February 5, 2005, 11:19, Jurgen Haug wrote:
b) professionally, in the industry I'm working, like it or not, HTML
mail is a must.
Sorry, I disagree.
I am using emails professionally since 1994.
And I have never seen an industry/company where HTML is a *must*.
--
Kveðja,
Hello Jurgen,
A reminder of what Jurgen Haug on TBOT typed on:
Saturday, February 05, 2005 at 11:20:36 GMT +0100
JH And if even so, so what?
To be honest, I'm easy either way. I have no problem with displaying html
images direct from the web in email, it can't hurt can it?
It's just so
Hello Thorvald,
Saturday, February 5, 2005, 11:37:16 AM, you wrote:
Hæ!
Saturday, February 5, 2005, 11:19, Jurgen Haug wrote:
b) professionally, in the industry I'm working, like it or not, HTML
mail is a must.
Sorry, I disagree.
I am using emails professionally since 1994.
And I
Hæ!
Saturday, February 5, 2005, 11:45, Jurgen Haug wrote:
so you tell me you know better than me what is going on in the kind
of industry *I* am working?
Read my sentence again. I did not say that. It's your interpretation.
--
Kveðja, Thorvald Neumann | http://www.aesir.de/
| The Bat!
Dear Jurgen,
@5-Feb-2005, 08:09 +0100 (05-Feb 07:09 UK time) Jurgen Haug [JH] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to David:
Yeah, I know that. He wants to be able to open the images right in
the menu pane like Thunderbird or Pocomail does.
JH yeah that would be nice, it would have made me convert
Hello Tony,
Saturday, February 5, 2005, 11:46:23 AM, you wrote:
To be honest, I'm easy either way. I have no problem with displaying html
images direct from the web in email, it can't hurt can it?
It's just so many people are against it.
so many people *on here* are against it. But I
At 11:33 [GMT+0100] on Saturday February 5 (actual time - 6:33pm on Saturday in
Perth, Western Australia), you wrote:
If I send out a weekly schedule to the people I work for/with, being
able to
colour-code the different sports/teams I'm covering that week is
incredibly
useful, so
At 12:52 [GMT+0100] on Saturday February 5 (actual time - 7:52pm on Saturday in
Perth, Western Australia), you wrote:
Jurgen And better support for HTML mail. But I think they're working on that.
Indeed - being able to save a template as HTML would be a real time-saver for
me. (Even if it
Hæ!
Saturday, February 5, 2005, 12:50, Mic Cullen wrote:
No, I don't want the world to see it.
A website does not imply it's accessible to the whole world.
--
Kveðja, Thorvald Neumann | http://www.aesir.de/
| The Bat! v3.0.2.10 Professional K9 v1.28
| Windows 2000 SP4 (v5.0.2195)
Hello Marck,
Saturday, February 5, 2005, 12:24:38 PM, you wrote:
JH yeah that would be nice, it would have made me convert some people
JH to TB! This and HTML mail as standard when you start a new mail.
Preferences..Viewer/Editor..Default message/text editor.
Enjoy. (Or shudder, as I do).
At 13:05 [GMT+0100] on Saturday February 5 (actual time - 8:05pm on Saturday in
Perth, Western Australia), you wrote:
No, I don't want the world to see it.
Thorvald A website does not imply it's accessible to the whole world.
This is getting ridiculous, but if I want people (of
Hello Thorvald,
On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 10:33:53 +0100 GMT (05/02/2005, 16:33 +0700 GMT),
Thorvald Neumann wrote:
Sometimes it's extremely useful. Rarely, but when you need it, you
really need it.
TN No, sorry. I do not see any sense in using HTML for emails at all.
Thanks for your opinion. I
Hallo Jurgen,
On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 12:46:44 +0100GMT (5-2-2005, 12:46 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
JH But I didn't buy TB! to communicate with TB!-users.
Neither did I and I still haven't decided whether it's an advantage or
a disadvantage that it enables me to do so. ;-)
--
Groetjes,
Hello Thorvald Neumann everyone else,
on 05-Feb-2005 at 11:32 you (Thorvald Neumann) wrote:
I am fully aware of the security risks of HTML emails.
Could you name one, please. Talking about security, not privacy. Talking
about pure HTML (not javascript, and not ActiveX, either).
--
Best
On 05 February 2005, 10:46, Tony Boom wrote:
To be honest, I'm easy either way. I have no problem with displaying html
images direct from the web in email, it can't hurt can it?
~~~
I, for one, am very glad that TB won't display external images, and
it's the main reason why I was prepared
Hello Geoff Lane everyone else,
on 05-Feb-2005 at 13:48 you (Geoff Lane) wrote:
External images can be used for malevolent purposes. For example, as
web beacons to track your usage, or for spammers to verify your e-mail
address. So, yes, displaying html images direct from the web in e-mail
Hello Alexander,
Saturday, February 5, 2005, 1:52:05 PM, you wrote:
This is a privacy, not a security issue. For that very reason the wish to
add a sender to a list of trusted senders from whom remote images are
allowed exists. Or a simple menu entry download images now.
:good: that's one
Hello Jurgen,
On Sat, 5 Feb 2005, at 08:09:50 [GMT +0100] (which was 7:09 where I
live) you wrote:
yeah that would be nice, it would have made me convert some
people to TB! This and HTML mail as standard when you start a new
mail. Each time I show collegues TB! (am the only one using that at
1 - 100 of 233 matches
Mail list logo
