Re: [OT] Bat! Registration

2002-04-03 Thread Roelof Otten
Hello Dwight, On Thu, 4 Apr 2002 00:17:30 -0600GMT (4-4-02, 8:17 +0100GMT, where I live), you wrote: No, and I would attribute it to the Easter Holiday. I wouldn't be surprised if you received it tomorrow. DAC Isn't Easter next week? Depends on on the church, but the Roman Catholic Church

Re: [OT] Bat! Registration

2002-04-03 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Wednesday, April 3, 2002, 10:51:33 PM, Nick Andriash wrote: Is this normal? No, and I would attribute it to the Easter Holiday. I wouldn't be surprised if you received it tomorrow. Isn't Easter next week? -- Dwight A. Corrin P O Box 47828 Wichita KS 67201-7828 316.263.9706 fax

OT - Windows 2000 server

2002-04-01 Thread Roel
Hello Everybody, Does the windows 2000 server has to be within the same subnet as the windows 2000 client in order to make use of roaming profiles? I can't test it in the upcoming couple of days, but I do need to know this pretty urgent, since I need to reinstall several systems and

Re: TB! mailaccounts (OT?)

2002-03-28 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello Joseph! On Thursday, March 28, 2002 at 5:57:02 AM you wrote: No clue what you're talking about. What is Netcaptor? What is Babylon? Sounds very interesting Netcaptor: A browser using IE's engine. Babylon: A website to translate texts. Another option would be to use Opera 6.xx

Re: TB! mailaccounts (OT?)

2002-03-28 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello Luc! On Wednesday, March 27, 2002 at 7:21:25 PM you wrote: Tnx !! Not to mention. BTW, sorry I haven't replied to your question about settings - in the moment I have to force myself from the computer. and yesterday I was successful - due to some sunshine and even slightly tolerable

TB! mailaccounts (OT?)

2002-03-27 Thread Luc
Hi list, At the moment, i also have a yahoo account which i have set up that way that my mail, send to that account, get's forwarded to TB!, rather then having it sitting at Yahoo's web client. I'm considering changing that account and i was wondering if somebody knows

Re: TB! mailaccounts (OT?)

2002-03-27 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello Luc! On Wednesday, March 27, 2002 at 4:38:39 PM you wrote: I'm considering changing that account and i was wondering if somebody knows of a good (free) alternative that has the capability to forward the messages to TB! If you have no problem with German: GMX. --

Re[2]: TB! mailaccounts (OT?)

2002-03-27 Thread Joseph N.
I'm considering changing that account and i was wondering if somebody knows of a good (free) alternative that has the capability to forward the messages to TB! If you have no problem with German: GMX. GMX is an outstanding service, but, yes, it's vital to know German to use

Re: TB! mailaccounts (OT?)

2002-03-27 Thread Luc
It was foretold that on 27-3-2002 @ 16:47:22 GMT+0100 (which was 16:47 where I live) Dierk Haasis wrote and spread these wise comments on TB! mailaccounts (OT?): DH If you have no problem with German: GMX. Tnx !! -- Best regards, Lucmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: TB! mailaccounts (OT?)

2002-03-27 Thread reclutamiento
I'm considering changing that account and i was wondering if somebody knows of a good (free) alternative that has the capability to forward the messages to TB! Check this out: Not sure? http://www.operamail.com/ Current

Re: TB! mailaccounts (OT?)

2002-03-27 Thread Melissa Reese
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday, March 27, 2002, at 7:47:22 AM PST, Dierk Haasis wrote: If you have no problem with German: GMX. I have some GMX accounts that I set up while they still offered the English pages, and I can almost adequately stumble through the

Re: TB! mailaccounts (OT?)

2002-03-27 Thread Luc
It was foretold that on 27-3-2002 @ 15:07:04 GMT-0400 (which was 20:07 where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and spread these wise comments on TB! mailaccounts (OT?): rsn Check this out: Not sure? rsn http://www.operamail.com/ It offers no POP3, SMTP and IMAP support. This means

Re[2]: TB! mailaccounts (OT?)

2002-03-27 Thread William Moore
Hello Luc Thank you for your email dated Wednesday, March 27, 2002, 7:43:38 PM, in which you wrote: rsn operamail L It offers no POP3, SMTP and IMAP support. I understand that Opera will be charging for this service soon, too. -- Regards William PGP spoken here - email me for my Public

Re: TB! mailaccounts (OT?)

2002-03-27 Thread Melissa Reese
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday, March 27, 2002, at 1:49:14 PM PST, DG Raftery Sr. wrote: Although myrealbox is an extremely good account, and used here, myrealbox is IMAP and not pop3. Not quite. It has POP3/SMTP access as well (I have one myrealbox POP3/SMTP

Re: TB! mailaccounts (OT?)

2002-03-27 Thread Dave Goodman
DG Raftery Sr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Although myrealbox is an extremely good account, and used here, myrealbox is IMAP and not pop3. Ummm... I've been running a myrealbox account for some months now, using POP3/SMTP. I don't argue that they don't also provide IMAP. -- Dave Goodman The

Re[3]: TB! mailaccounts (OT?)

2002-03-27 Thread John Seymour
Hello Joseph JN Does anyone here know whether Fastmail will page a POP3 account, and JN whether mail can be sent and retrieved via POP3? Yes Fastmail will do that. They will still offer a free service but are offering more features for paid. The more I use it the more I like this service. --

Re: TB! mailaccounts (OT?)

2002-03-27 Thread ETM
There are limitations and they should be carefully noted, but one such server is at http://www.softhome.net/ Elaine Hello William On Wednesday, March 27, 2002, you wrote Hello Luc Thank you for your email dated Wednesday, March 27, 2002, 7:43:38 PM, in which you wrote: rsn operamail L

Re: TB! mailaccounts (OT?)

2002-03-27 Thread Paul Wilson
Wednesday, 3/27/02, 8:19 PM Hi Joseph, On Wed, 27 Mar 2002, at 10:12:32 [GMT -0600] (which was 8:12 AM where I live) you wrote about: 'TB! mailaccounts (OT?)' JN GMX is an outstanding service, but, yes, it's vital to know German to JN use it. When they discontinued the English service, I

Re[2]: TB! mailaccounts (OT?)

2002-03-27 Thread Joseph N.
Paul Wilson wrote on Wednesday, March 27, 2002: If you use Netcaptor you can translate the pages from German to English using Babylon. That is the way I deal with my two GMX accounts. No clue what you're talking about. What is Netcaptor? What is Babylon? Sounds very interesting

Re: TB! mailaccounts (OT?)

2002-03-27 Thread Melissa Reese
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday, March 27, 2002, at 8:21:06 PM PST, Paul Wilson wrote: If you use Netcaptor you can translate the pages from German to English using Babylon. That is the way I deal with my two GMX accounts. Using any browser, Alta-Vista

Re: Defragmentation of message bases - Maybe OT

2002-02-23 Thread Raj
Alastair, On Sat, 23 Feb 2002, at 15:12:16 [GMT +] (which was 8:42 PM where I live) you wrote: AS This will grind away and come back to the DOS prompt sooner or later. AS In my case it produces a considerable speed improvement, particularly AS in backing up and compressing folders. In my

Re[3]: [OT] free decent virus checker that works with TB?

2002-02-12 Thread DG Raftery Sr.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: MD5 Tuesday, February 12, 2002 9:43:30 AM RE: [OT] free decent virus checker that works with TB? Greetings Jernej, On Monday, February 11, 2002, 8:57:03 AM, you wrote: Jernej Hello Dierk, Jernej 11. februar 2002, 14:29:22, you wrote: DH But I tested

Re: OT: A good laugh

2002-02-12 Thread Peter Meyns
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 12 Feb 2002 08:46:55 +0100GMT (which was 12.02.02, 08:46 +0100GMT where I live), Dierk Haasis wrote this about OT: A good laugh: Oh yes, Dierk, there is. :)) It's almost 5MB. As soon as I'll have my DSL working I'll send it to you

Re: OT: A good laugh

2002-02-11 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Monday, February 11, 2002, 4:01:32 PM, Peter Meyns wrote: Winamp currently playing: Marusha - Somewhere Over The Rainbow (Happy Hardcore Mix) DH Perhaps I shouldn't be at the computer at this time - or at all, but DH this line brought me down on my knees, laughing my bottom off. DH Please

Re: [OT sort of] PocoMail- was Re[4]: HTML based emails

2002-01-15 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello Jan! On 15 Jan 2002 at 3:20:20 am you wrote: I'd take a Porsche over a Mercedes any day. Well, both are German luxury cars ... which means most Germans like them, virtually every non-German, and me not. I'd rather have a good British (they are mostly half American today), Italian or

Re: [OT sort of] PocoMail- was Re[4]: HTML based emails

2002-01-15 Thread Melissa Reese
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday, January 15, 2002, at 12:20:27 AM PST, Dierk Haasis wrote: Why, o why ... again a superfluous HTML mail with bad wrapping ... Give them an inch, and they take up the whole road... :-( It really is a dangerous line to cross. People

Re: [OT sort of] PocoMail- was Re[4]: HTML based emails

2002-01-15 Thread Alastair Scott
On 15 January 2002 at 8:31 am Dierk wrote: Well, both are German luxury cars ... which means most Germans like them, virtually every non-German, and me not. I'd rather have a good British (they are mostly half American today), Italian or French car. Even the Spanish version of German cars

Re: [OT sort of] PocoMail- was Re[4]: HTML based emails

2002-01-15 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello Ray! On 14 Jan 2002 at 11:19:43 pm you wrote: I just like to see HTML and every now and then write html. Every now and then? Shouldn't HTML messages only be used if necessary? I mean, you send a pure plain text message as HTML - just to annoy us? Or are you trying to make a point like

Re: [OT sort of] PocoMail- was Re[4]: HTML based emails

2002-01-15 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello Ray! On 14 Jan 2002 at 10:32:18 pm you wrote: I could go on for a while but till now i realy like the slickinterface of PocoMail a lot better than the Bat and also itsHTML-possibility.   The Bat in my eyes is developping towards a more and more hightechmailer (I am an Unix guru

DEAD HORSE (was [OT sort of] PocoMail- was Re[4]: HTML based emails)

2002-01-15 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Dierk, On 15 January 2002 at 09:09:18 +0100 (which was 08:09 where I live) Dierk Haasis wrote to Ray Vermey and made these points: Did I get your point, your irony? moderator This topic has gone way off and I am forced to pronounce it dead.

Re: [OT sort of] PocoMail- was Re[4]: HTML based emails

2002-01-15 Thread Jan Rifkinson
Hello Dierk. At 3:31 AM on Tuesday, January 15, 2002 you wrote the following in response to my comments [[OT sort of] PocoMail- was Re[4]: HTML based emails] I'd take a Porsche over a Mercedes any day. Dierk Well, both are German luxury cars ... which Dierk means most Germans like them

DEAD HORSE (was [OT sort of] PocoMail- was Re[4]: HTML based emails)

2002-01-15 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Jan, On 15 January 2002 at 10:45:52 -0500 (which was 15:45 where I live) Jan Rifkinson wrote to Dierk Haasis and made these points: ... but I always welcome comic relief. :-) moderator This topic has gone way off and I am forced to

Re: DEAD HORSE (was [OT sort of] PocoMail- was Re[4]: HTML based emails)

2002-01-15 Thread Jan Rifkinson
Hello Marck. At 11:03 AM on Tuesday, January 15, 2002 you wrote the following about [DEAD HORSE (was [OT sort of] PocoMail- was Re[4]: HTML based emails)] Marck [...] I am forced to pronounce it dead. [/...] Marck Please take it off-list or to TBOT. Sorry, Mark. I actually thought I had done

Re: DEAD HORSE (was [OT sort of] PocoMail- was Re[4]: HTML based emails)

2002-01-15 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Jan, On 15 January 2002 at 11:34:35 -0500 (which was 16:34 where I live) Jan Rifkinson wrote to Marck D Pearlstone and made these points: Marck [...] I am forced to pronounce it dead. [/...] Please take it Marck off-list or to TBOT. Sorry,

Re: [OT]Re: Numbers in the Subject Line

2002-01-15 Thread David van Zuijlekom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Nick, On 15 Jan 2002 at 14:18:52 -0600, Nick Danger [ND] wrote concerning 'Numbers in the Subject Line': AtDhVaAnNkCsE ND Cute. Is there a name for this type of puzzle? I seem to recall ND seeing a bunch of them in an old Games magazine

Re: [OT] Numbers in the Subject Line

2002-01-15 Thread Lars Geiger
Hi David, On 15 Jan 2002 at 21:25:30 [GMT +0100], you wrote: AtDhVaAnNkCsE DvZ A wild guess: DvZ ADVANCE thanks? Nearly, I'd say. It's the word thanks in the word ADVANCE. Or thanks in ADVANCE. -- Regards, Lars The Bat! 1.54 Beta/28 on Windows NT 5.1 Build 2600

Re: [OT sort of] PocoMail- was Re[4]: HTML based emails

2002-01-14 Thread Nick Andriash
Hello Rick Reumann, On Sunday, January 13 2002 at 07:20 PM PDT, you wrote: I'm just curious if anyone could give me some of the benefits/drawbacks of using PocoMail vs The Bat! Being the curious type, I tried it but right from the start I couldn't even set up hierarchical folders so that

Re: [OT sort of] PocoMail- was Re[4]: HTML based emails

2002-01-14 Thread Alastair Scott
On 14 January 2002 at 03:20 Rick wrote: I'm just curious if anyone could give me some of the benefits/drawbacks of using PocoMail vs The Bat! I'm a registered user of The Bat! that came from Pegasus so I'm just curious what some users of it think of it compared to The Bat!. If

Re: [OT sort of] PocoMail- was Re[4]: HTML based emails

2002-01-14 Thread Kenneth S. Rhee
On Mon, 14 Jan 2002 18:37:02 +, Alastair Scott wrote: Well, I had a look at Poco and it turned me right off straight away (as Pegasus and Eudora do). I'm a user interface designer - and sensitive to such things - and I'd rather have an old-fashioned interface like TB's rather than one which

Re: [OT sort of] PocoMail- was Re[4]: HTML based emails

2002-01-14 Thread Kenneth S. Rhee
On Mon, 14 Jan 2002 10:23:59 -0800, Nick Andriash wrote: Being the curious type, I tried it but right from the start I couldn't even set up hierarchical folders so that pretty much did it for me. If there is a way I couldn't find it... You can set up the subfolders. I believe you have to do it

Re: [OT sort of] PocoMail- was Re[4]: HTML based emails

2002-01-14 Thread Luc
It was foretold that on 14-1-2002 @ 22:20:39 GMT-0500 (which was 4:20 where I live) Rick Reumann wrote and spread these wise comments on [OT sort of] PocoMail- was Re[4]: HTML based emails: RR On Sunday, January 13, 2002, 4:24:39 PM, GeekMaster wrote: G on the fly inline HTML message

Re: [OT sort of] PocoMail- was Re[4]: HTML based emails

2002-01-14 Thread Ray Vermey
On Mon, 14 Jan 2002 21:18:00 +0100, Luc wrote: RROn Sunday, January 13, 2002, 4:24:39 PM, GeekMaster wrote: GPocoMail. In some ways, it's less powerful than The Bat, but nobody works harder than PocoMail's Gauthor at accomodating user requests in the mail client. HTML is nothing new, and

Re: [OT sort of] PocoMail- was Re[4]: HTML based emails

2002-01-14 Thread Lars Geiger
Hi Ray, On 14 Jan 2002 at 22:32:18 [GMT +0100], you wrote: 5) I like the HTML-editor of Poco. Yes, and you showed us how much you liked it by sending a HTML formatted message. Really useful! :-\ -- Regards, Lars The Bat! 1.54 Beta/28 on Windows NT 5.1 Build 2600

Re[2]: [OT sort of] PocoMail- was Re[4]: HTML based emails

2002-01-14 Thread Carren Stuart
scolded for continuing this somewhat OT thread, I need to disagree entirely with you! Prior to finding TB! I trialled Poco for some time and while I really liked it - especially having come to it from Outlook 2000 - once I also began to trial TB! I realised very quickly that TB! was (and is) far

Re[3]: [OT sort of] PocoMail- was Re[4]: HTML based emails

2002-01-14 Thread Ray Vermey
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002 10:57:19 +1300, Carren Stuart wrote: /SNIP/ Well Caren, email clients are just a matter of personal taste, we can agree on that one ;-) I just like to see HTML and every now and then write html. Sure the Bat is a great one and i use it for almost 3 years now as a registered

Re[4]: [OT sort of] PocoMail- was Re[4]: HTML based emails

2002-01-14 Thread Kenneth S. Rhee
On Mon, 14 Jan 2002 23:19:43 +0100, Ray Vermey wrote: If the Bat was to be integrated with Poco... whohah THAT would be some car with some engine ;-) Vrommm ;-) If you take the best part of the BAT (the latest beta) and best of PocoMail (the latest beta), and come up with the

Re[4]: [OT sort of] PocoMail- was Re[4]: HTML based emails

2002-01-14 Thread Carren Stuart
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday, 15 January 2002 at 11:19 a.m. Ray wrote: SNIP RV If the Bat was to be integrated with Poco... whohah THAT would RV be some car with some engine ;-)   RV Vrommm ;-) Ray, *That* I can agree with! :-)   Carren PGP

Re: [OT sort of] PocoMail- was Re[4]: HTML based emails

2002-01-14 Thread David van Zuijlekom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Kenneth, On 14 Jan 2002 at 13:46:28 -0500, Kenneth S. Rhee [KSR] wrote concerning ': HTML based emails': ... Being the curious type, I tried it but right from the start I couldn't even set up hierarchical folders so that pretty much did it for

Re: [OT sort of] PocoMail- was Re[4]: HTML based emails

2002-01-14 Thread Kenneth S. Rhee
On Mon, 14 Jan 2002 23:48:24 +0100, David van Zuijlekom wrote: I can say one thing about Pocomail: the wrapping sucks! Look at your reply you gave to Nick. It looks a lot like the most irritating wrapping like in OL/OE. ;-( To each his/her own. However, let's try to be objective here. I own

Re: [OT sort of] PocoMail- was Re[4]: HTML based emails

2002-01-14 Thread Melissa Reese
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday, January 14, 2002, at 1:32:18 PM PST, Ray Vermey wrote: RR On Sunday, January 13, 2002, 4:24:39 PM, GeekMaster wrote: G PocoMail.  In some ways, it's less powerful than The Bat, but nobody works harder than PocoMail's G author at

Re: [OT sort of] PocoMail- was Re[4]: HTML based emails

2002-01-14 Thread GeekMaster
At 6:09:11 pm on 1/14/2002, you wrote: snip In spite of what I see as some very serious shortcomings, I do in fact really like Pocomail. Certainly - if Slaven were to get together with the programmers of TB!, there could be some *very interesting* developments! :-) I think, for the most

Re: [OT sort of] PocoMail- was Re[4]: HTML based emails

2002-01-14 Thread Jan Rifkinson
Hello Ray. At 4:32 PM on Monday, January 14, 2002 you wrote the following about [[OT sort of] PocoMail- was Re[4]: HTML based emails] Ray [...] Well i will playing around for some time Ray with Pocomail and see howthings develop. But going Ray back to the Bat is like stepping in an old(but Ray

Re[2]: [OT sort of] PocoMail- was Re[4]: HTML based emails

2002-01-14 Thread Don Zeigler
On 1/14/2002 at 3:09 PM, Melissa Reese wrote: In spite of what I see as some very serious shortcomings, I do in fact really like Pocomail. Certainly - if Slaven were to get together with the programmers of TB!, there could be some *very interesting* developments! :-) Pocobat? -- Regards,

Re[2]: [OT sort of] PocoMail- was Re[4]: HTML based emails

2002-01-14 Thread Don Zeigler
On 1/14/2002 at 1:32 PM, Ray Vermey wrote: 3) Multiple accounts are much easier under the Bat, in Poco you haveto log in and out of the different accounts But each account suports multiple servers and identities. 9) Filtering is also very easy Pocomail's filters don't compare to TB. Poco's

Re: [OT sort of] PocoMail- was Re[4]: HTML based emails

2002-01-14 Thread Alastair Scott
On 14 January 2002 at 23:09 Melissa wrote: Personally, I think Slaven is great. I know he's dedicated to making Pocomail better, and no doubt it will improve. His tireless programming efforts and dedication to customer support (and openness to and implementation of suggestions) are much

Re[3]: 1.53t - OT

2002-01-13 Thread Jernej Simonèiè
Hello Luc, 13. januar 2002, 18:04:25, you wrote: L www.winace.com handles all files, has a neat interface and is simple L to use It's interface is much too bloated IMO, and it doesn't have a usable command-line version (console version - it always opens the GUI window). Even though it

[OT sort of] PocoMail- was Re[4]: HTML based emails

2002-01-13 Thread Rick Reumann
On Sunday, January 13, 2002, 4:24:39 PM, GeekMaster wrote: G on the fly inline HTML message rendering. At this moment, I'm composing this from Opera 6's e-mail G client, because being integrated into the browser, it's so very convenient. Generally though, I use G PocoMail. In some ways,

Re: [OT sort of] PocoMail- was Re[4]: HTML based emails

2002-01-13 Thread GeekMaster
Rick Reumann wrote: I'm just curious if anyone could give me some of the benefits/drawbacks of using PocoMail vs The Bat! Hi Rick. As you mention in your message, this might not be the best place for a blow-by-blow comparison, but certainly trying it is the best way to get a feel for

Re: [OT sort of] PocoMail- was Re[4]: HTML based emails

2002-01-13 Thread Melissa Reese
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday, January 13, 2002, at 7:48:08 PM PST, GeekMaster wrote: Anyway, give it a look. I want to say, like you, I am a registered user of The Bat, and as I said, I really do think it's among the very best apps out there. But, being the fanatic

Re[2]: [OT sort of] PocoMail- was Re[4]: HTML based emails

2002-01-13 Thread Ray Vermey
Hello Melissa, 14 Jan 2002, 5:22:02, you wrote: MR -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- MR Hash: SHA1 MR On Sunday, January 13, 2002, at 7:48:08 PM PST, GeekMaster wrote: Anyway, give it a look. I want to say, like you, I am a registered user of The Bat, and as I said, I really do think it's

OT: Changes at GMX

2002-01-10 Thread Randy Burns
For those who are interested in GMX free email: - Start Forwarded Message - From: GMX [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Alle Mitglieder von GMX [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: GMX International Dear GMX member, as you are a user of our e-mail services, you might know that GMX is a company based in

[OT] gmx.net

2002-01-09 Thread Rick Reumann
Off topic post-- Someone mentioned on this list that they use gmx.net as a nice free POP account service so I've been using it for a while now. It really is awesome. They just announced, however, that they are no longer providing multilingual support (they're a German company). As they mention,

Re: [OT] gmx.net

2002-01-09 Thread Leif Gregory
Hello Rick, On Wed, 9 Jan 2002 at 14:42:35 [GMT -0500], you wrote: RR I'm curious if anyone has found some other good free POP accounts RR please let me know. ( I also have a Yahoo account which is nice RR but it fills up with more spam than the gmx.net one, plus gmx.net RR allows the transfer

OT - was Re: SOT:Re[2]: Should I dump Outlook 2000?

2002-01-09 Thread Leif Gregory
Hello Gerard, On Wed, 9 Jan 2002 at 09:11:13 [GMT +0100], you wrote: GdV Depends on who you expect to share more wisdom ;-) moderator note Getting pretty OT... Thanks. /moderator note Cheers, Leif Gregory -- List Moderator (and fellow registered end-user) PCWize Editor / ICQ 216395

OT: Vigor (was: Should I dump Outlook 2000?)

2002-01-08 Thread Carsten Thnges
Hi Konstantin, [...] KV I have another good(or excellent?) idea - to support MS agent KV characters(those animated things in MS office). KV They would give the information in the proper manner and KV will smooth over the work and will relax you at home. [...]

Re: OT: Vigor

2002-01-08 Thread Thomas F
Hi Carsten, On Tue, 8 Jan 2002 22:43:19 +0100GMT (09/01/2002, 05:43 +0800GMT), Carsten Thönges wrote: CT http://www.red-bean.com/~joelh/vigor/ CT http://www.red-bean.com/~joelh/vigor/screenshots/ LOLOLOL! I *do* want a plug-in for TB! ;-) -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat!

Re: OT: Browsers

2002-01-07 Thread David van Zuijlekom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello David, On 7 Jan 2002 at 00:25:05 +0100, David van Zuijlekom [DVZ] wrote concerning 'OT: Browsers': ... DvZ but I can't get it to open a link when double clicking on it. After a restart it's working now, but instead of one window every time I

OT: To HTML or not to HTML (was: Macros for all address book field)

2002-01-07 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hello Roelof, On 7 Jan 2002 at 18:09:25 you wrote (at least in part): RO BTW Why do you use HTML-encoding mail for a message that doesn't need RO it? Makes the message more than twice as long as necessary. A waste of RO bandwidth for you and everybody else on this list. Because he's using the

OT: Browsers

2002-01-06 Thread Joseph N.
Lotsa messages on Opera. FWIW, I tried and left versions 5 and 6 of Opera for reasons of too frequent inoperability. While I think that IE6 is pretty good on several scales, I have a multi-user (family) machine, and for that reason use Mozilla. Mozilla www.mozilla.org is the OpenSource base

Re: OT: Browsers

2002-01-06 Thread Avenarius
A Bat-fellow, Joseph N., wrote on Sunday, 6th January 2002 at 10:05:20 (GMT -0600), which was 17:05 in Bratislava -- JN Mozilla www.mozilla.org is the OpenSource base for Netscape and JN some others. It is much faster and smoother than IE in my view, JN and it has favorites and preferences that

Re[2]: OT: Browsers

2002-01-06 Thread Luc
It was foretold that on 6-1-2002 @ 20:47:23 GMT+0100 (which was 20:47 where I live) Avenarius wrote and spread these wise comments on OT: Browsers: Opera rocks and is without competition, just as TB! is without competition in the mailing world. You said it Opera rocks indeed

Re: OT: Browsers

2002-01-06 Thread Mrten
. try downloading 0.9.7, it's fixed, just tried it. very OT: if you have suggestions for Mozilla, file them at http://bugzilla.mozilla.org . It's still in the making (hence 0.9.x), help making it the greatest free browser available! :) /plug Mrten. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5i

Re[2]: OT: Browsers

2002-01-06 Thread Alan Poulton
Sunday, January 06, 2002, 11:47:23 AM, Avenarius wrote: Opera rocks and is without competition, just as TB! is without competition in the mailing world. I used to use Netscape primarily, but was forced to switch to IE because I can make Netscape crash without trying hard. My problem is that

Re: OT: Browsers

2002-01-06 Thread Mrten
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Om 21:46 op zondag 6 januari 2002, Alan Poulton: Does Opera still behave this way? How about Mozilla? Mozilla has tabs, don't know if they suit your needs. You can 'open window in new tab'. Personally I don't use the feature, so I really can't

Re: OT: Browsers

2002-01-06 Thread Avenarius
A Bat-fellow, Alan Poulton, wrote on Sunday, 6th January 2002 at 12:46:47 (GMT -0800), which was 21:46 in Bratislava -- AP When I last tried Opera, the biggest complaint I had was how it handled AP multiple instances, or windows. Currently, when I do a search on AP Google, I'll open a bunch of

Re: OT: Browsers

2002-01-06 Thread Ottar Grimstad
Hello Alan, 6 Jan 2002, 21:46:47, you wrote to TBUDL: AP With Opera, all the new windows were in the Window pull down and AP I could see no easy way of switching between them. Control-Tab in version 6 if you prefer multiple windows inside Opera (I like it), but you now can chose to have

Re[3]: OT: Browsers

2002-01-06 Thread Jernej Simoni
Hello Alan, 06. januar 2002, 21:46:47, you wrote: AP Does Opera still behave this way? How about Mozilla? In Opera 6 you can choose between MDI (Opera classic) style and SDI (other browsers) style. In MDI mode you can use CtrlTab in the same way as AltTab for other windows. SDI mode works

Re: OT: Browsers

2002-01-06 Thread David van Zuijlekom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Mrten, On 6 Jan 2002 at 21:06:10 +0100, Mrten [M] wrote concerning 'OT: Browsers': ... M try downloading 0.9.7, it's fixed, just tried it. I downloaded it and it looks very promising, but I can't get it to open a link when double clicking

Re: OT: Browsers

2002-01-06 Thread Carsten Thnges
Hi Alan, Opera rocks and is without competition, just as TB! is without competition in the mailing world. ACK. [...] AP When I last tried Opera, the biggest complaint I had was how it handled AP multiple instances, or windows. Currently, when I do a search on AP Google, I'll open a bunch

Re: Does it hard to code proportional FONT ?!!? aloha.. /Valid signature (OT)

2002-01-05 Thread Eddie Castelli
Dear Ottar, --- Ottar Grimstad / Samstag, 05.01.2002, 08:38:04 Does it hard to code proportional FONT ?!!? aloha.. /Valid signature (OT) Your message read with an attachment in the attachment pane saying Valid signature with a corresponding icon. I have nevr seen this before

Re: Valid signature (OT)

2002-01-05 Thread Ottar Grimstad
Hello Eddie, Saturday, January 05, 2002, 9:05:22 AM, you wrote to TBUDL: EC This is a S/MIME Signature - in this case from Thawte (see: EC www.thawte.com). You can setup your account for free and sign your EC document. If the recipient has S/MIME certificate and is sorted in EC your AB you can

Re: Valid signature (OT)

2002-01-05 Thread Eddie Castelli
--- Ottar Grimstad / Samstag, 05.01.2002, 09:32:26 Valid signature (OT) Kär Ottar, Is this an alternative til PGP? You are indeed Scandinavian :-)) --- ... 'til' PGP But never mind we are open for much and focus on content! It looks neater than the PGP blocks, but what

OT: EMailoholic (was: Changing both sender replyto)

2002-01-05 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hello Thomas, On 5 Jan 2002 at 16:02:36 you wrote (at least in part): TF Any one of us who reads less than 300 emails a day suffers from TF withdrawal. Apparently, you prefer to have a life instead... Full-ACK. My girlfriends prefers I have a life instead ... *GGG* But I still can withstand

Re: Does it hard to code proportional FONT ?!!? aloha.. /Valid signature (OT)

2002-01-04 Thread Ottar Grimstad
Hello Tong, Friday, January 04, 2002, 7:29:37 PM, you wrote to TBUDL: TN in delphi 6, it is easy to switch proportional font TN with one properties. Your message read with an attachment in the attachment pane saying Valid signature with a corresponding icon. I have nevr seen this

Re: This mailing-list (OT?)

2001-12-31 Thread Januk Aggarwal
Hello Dirk, An archeological dig discovered that on Sunday, December 30, 2001 at 13:39 GMT +0100, Dirk Dörr [DD] typed the following: DD I am more concerned about other features like the missing of a DD on-the-fly-decrypting and not storing of a PGP message (This for DD example is a

Re[2]: This mailing-list (OT?)

2001-12-31 Thread Dirk Dörr
. Thanks for the information but I have known this. About AuthenticBat I don't know anything. Maybe Marck D. Pearlstone could tell us more, 'cause he is listed as the UK distributor for SecureBat! (Question: Is this OT? ) But SecureBat is far more than I want. AFAIK it encrypts the whole message base

Re: This mailing-list (OT?)

2001-12-31 Thread Nick Andriash
Hello Dirk Dörr, On Monday, December 31 2001 at 04:14 AM PDT, you wrote: Despite of this advantage of PMMail I decided to buy TheBat! because it seems to have very motivated developers and a Linux version could be possible because they are using Delphi (Are there any news about this?). And

Re[2]: This mailing-list (OT?)

2001-12-31 Thread Dirk Dörr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Nick! You wrote: What exactly are you referring to when you say on-the-fly decryption? At first I was reading into what you said and thought you were referring to on-the-fly encryption, which is what SecureBat does, but you may well be

Re: OT - best freeware/shareware web authoring program?

2001-12-31 Thread Silviu Cojocaru
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 29 Dec 2001 at 15:28:19 , Geoff Lane wrote the following on the OT - best freeware/shareware web authoring program? thread: GL I can't remember the post, but I can recommend First Page GL 2000 (http://www.evrsoft.com/) as a really good, text-based

Re: This mailing-list (OT?)

2001-12-31 Thread Allie C Martin
@ 17:49:45 +0100 [ Mon, 31 Dec 2001], Dirk Dörr [DD] wrote these words of wisdom: ... DD Yes, exactly. The behaviour I like to be implemented would be like DD this: DD - Receiving an encrypted message DD - Click on the message DD - TheBat! recognize the message as an encrypted

OT: Plural of virus (was: Up and running again)

2001-12-30 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello David! On 30 Dec 2001 at 12:15:17 you wrote: Some virui (is that the plural of Virus?) No, but it is a tough one. If you want to be overly correct the plural is virii (from Greek via Latin). In English you can also use viruses, which is actually the standard according to the SOED. But

This mailing-list (OT?)

2001-12-30 Thread Dirk Dörr
Hello! I am just following this list since a few weeks. It seems to be a well moderated list with a lot of hints and helpful members. But now I see that I might be wrong. The discussion about the BAT's word wrapping is going to be too emotional and looks like a flamewar. Even after several

Re: This mailing-list (OT?)

2001-12-30 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Dirk, On 30 December 2001 at 13:39:11 [GMT+0100] (which was 12:39 where I live) Dirk Dörr wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and made these points: DD Or better: Just stop it, please! I thank you for your support ;-). Well said. - -- Cheers -- .\\arck

Re: This mailing-list (OT?)

2001-12-30 Thread Alan Poulton
Sunday, December 30, 2001, 4:39:11 AM, Dirk Dörr wrote: The discussion about the BAT's word wrapping is going to be too emotional and looks like a flamewar. Even after several comments of the list moderator it doesn't stop. My only comment on this is that, unfortunately, we're human. We want

Re: This mailing-list (OT?)

2001-12-30 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Alan, On 30 December 2001 at 09:52:00 [GMT-0800] (which was 17:52 where I live) Alan Poulton wrote to Dirk Dörr and made these points: AP Alternately, it could be that people posted their comments before AP reading the list moderator's requests

Re: This mailing-list (OT?)

2001-12-30 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On 30 Dec 2001, 12:40:49 PM, Marck D Pearlstone wrote: I tend to park a lot of replies and let them fly when I'm sure I've got to the bottom of the thread. That is probably the better course, but a hard habit to start. On this list, things don't usually get so messy so who expects a dead

Re[2]: This mailing-list (OT?)

2001-12-30 Thread Jernej Simonèiè
Hello Marck, 30. december 2001, 19:40:49, you wrote: MDP I tend to park a lot of replies and let them fly when I'm sure I've MDP got to the bottom of the thread. I tend to write all replies and send them all at once (not only on this mailing list, this goes for all of them)... -- Jernej

(OT) archive tool (was: Re: SpellChecker)

2001-12-30 Thread Devid Verfaillie
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello TBUDL, On Sun, 30 Dec 2001, at 21:08:40 [GMT +0100] (which was 21:08:40 in Brussels) Peter Meyns wrote: Another good archive tool is Power Archiver from www.powerarchiver.com. It handles .zip and .rar archives and others. It is shareware.

Re[2]: OT - best freeware/shareware web authoring program?

2001-12-29 Thread Joe Finocchiaro
Saturday, December 29, 2001, 1:42:35 AM, you wrote: Hi Joe, On 29 Dec 2001 at 18:03:37 [GMT -0600], you wrote: JF Within the last 10-12 days or so, someone here wrote about a *great* JF freeware/shareware web authoring program. JF Does anyone remember it's name? Not the one that was

OT - best freeware/shareware web authoring program?

2001-12-28 Thread Joe Finocchiaro
Within the last 10-12 days or so, someone here wrote about a *great* freeware/shareware web authoring program. Does anyone remember it's name? Thanks! PS: Please feel free to write me privately. -- Joe Finocchiaro mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --

<    4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   >