I only get them on the odd occasion.
That's my experience -- I get a message such as that every once in a while,
but I don't worry too much about it. With Windows, It's Not All Ones and
Zeros anyway... :-)
--
Fred
Using TheBat V.4.2.44.2 for POP3 mail with Windows 7 Service Pack 1
On Tue, 2015-04-07, Fred wrote:
I only get them on the odd occasion.
That's my experience -- I get a message such as that every once in a while,
but I don't worry too much about it. With Windows, It's Not All Ones and
Zeros anyway... :-)
I also get this, very occasionally, and the once or
Hi
On Monday 6 April 2015 at 5:01:37 PM, in
mid:1775847081.20150406120...@grunwalds.com, Rick wrote:
I get a similar AV about 70% of the time
I only get them on the odd occasion.
--
Best regards
MFPA mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net
ETHERNET(n): device
Hi, everyone,
Shutting down The Bat, I received an error message that read as follows:
Access violation at address 01105125 in module 'TheBat.exe'. Read of
address 0008.
The Bat did shut down. Why did I get this error message?
I get a similar AV about 70% of the time
--
Rick
Hallo St,
On Sat, 12 Jul 2008 12:19:29 +0200GMT (12-7-2008, 12:19 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
SMN Where to should I direct my inquiry?
Help - Feedback - bugreport
--
Groetjes, Roelof
Function call to load Windows: here_piggy_piggy_piggy_piggy
http://www.voormijalleen.nl/
The Bat!
Hello Roelof,
On Sat, 12 Jul 2008 12:32:46 +0200 GMT (12/07/2008, 17:32 +0700 GMT),
Roelof Otten wrote:
SMN Where to should I direct my inquiry?
RO Help - Feedback - bugreport
Did you this? It opens a website which requires login.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
On a Korean kitchen knife... Warning:
am Samstag, 12. Juli 2008 um 12:19 schrieb ...listen2reason... - Musaic.Net:
I have a repeating error popping up in TB 4.0.24:
Access Violation at address 007E979F in module 'thebat.exe'.
Read of address 0004.
Where to should I direct my inquiry?
To the Beta List, because you
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
TH Hello TBUDL,
TH When trying to do a (Special) (Remind Later) and selecting (Search a
TH message in other folders in case it is moved) and choosing what
TH folders to search, upon clicking (Select All) (OK) I'm receiving an
TH (Access violation at
Hello Barry everyone else,
on 20-Jul-2006 at 12:37 you (Barry) wrote:
Any ideas?
You could try to disable all plugins and see if it still happens.
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de)
NP: Star Above Parvati (Bijli Mahadev mix) by Doof
(from the 1996 album Let's Turn
Hello Anthony,
On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 08:27:02 +0200 GMT (23/10/2004, 13:27 +0700 GMT),
Anthony G. Atkielski wrote:
You do empty the Recycle Bin occasionally, right?
Pal, with statements that ridiculous
AGA I used to do technical support, and that's a standard question, along
AGA the lines of
Alexander S. Kunz writes:
Pal, with statements that ridiculous I don't dare continuing this OT
conversation, sorry. I mean... no, I don't mean... you haven't been there,
so I'll just stop here... :-)
I used to do technical support, and that's a standard question, along
the lines of have you
Hello Anthony G. Atkielski everyone else
23-Okt-2004 08:27, you wrote:
That's why pilots have checklists
The average techsupp person has checklists to annoy callers who know whats
going on... :)
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981)
using v3.0.2.1 on Windows
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Sat, 23 Oct 2004,
@ @ at 19:35:34 +0200, when Alexander S. Kunz wrote
to Anthony G. Atkielski everyone else,
therefore including Me as well:
Hello Anthony
Alexander S. Kunz writes:
The average techsupp person has checklists to annoy callers who know whats
going on... :)
The vast majority of callers to tech support don't know what they are
doing, and there's no way to tell which callers _do_ know what they are
doing. Not going through the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Sat, 23 Oct 2004,
@ @ at 23:03:43 +0200, when Anthony G. Atkielski wrote:
It works for NASA; it will work for everyone else.
It didn't work for the shuttle.
- --
Mica
PGP key
On Saturday, October 23, 2004 at 4:03:43 PM [GMT -0500], Anthony G.
Atkielski wrote:
The vast majority of callers to tech support don't know what they
are doing, and there's no way to tell which callers _do_ know what
they are doing.
Well, in a way I'd disagree with that. It's not easy for a
Mica Mijatovic writes:
It didn't work for the shuttle.
It did work for the shuttle; but someone decided to skip a few steps.
--
Anthony
__
Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Allie Martin writes:
Well, in a way I'd disagree with that. It's not easy for a novice to
give detailed and technical information with explanations that imply
knowledge that exceeds that of the novice. :) In such a situation, one
can easily raise the tech support level.
Typically no one
-Original Message-
From: Alexander S. Kunz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Oct 21, 2004 8:39 AM
To: Michael L. Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Access violation when moving folders for rules
Hello Michael L. Wilson everyone else
21-Okt-2004 00:03, you wrote:
I know this and say
Michael Wilson writes:
I was software QA. My job was to setup new systems and see what
happened to the registry and temp files area after installing third
party items. I was in several meetings where memos from Hard Drive
comapnies were used by programmers to purposly not delete temp and old
Hello Michael Wilson everyone else
21-Okt-2004 18:38, you wrote:
Windows XP is the best and most stable, as hard drive size increases have
virtually stopped.
Uhm. I beg to differ, my experience is vastly different. HDD usage has
*never* increased more during daily usage than with Win XP. My
Alexander S. Kunz writes:
Uhm. I beg to differ, my experience is vastly different. HDD usage has
*never* increased more during daily usage than with Win XP. My system
partition (without additional programs - I have the program files on a
different partition) for XP is 4GB; after installation
Hello Anthony G. Atkielski everyone else
22-Okt-2004 19:43, you wrote:
You do empty the Recycle Bin occasionally, right?
Pal, with statements that ridiculous I don't dare continuing this OT
conversation, sorry. I mean... no, I don't mean... you haven't been there,
so I'll just stop here...
Hello Michael L. Wilson everyone else
21-Okt-2004 00:03, you wrote:
I know this and say this because I worked for 16 years in Redmond
Washington, for Microsoft
Since we remember (from the days of *that* signature of yours *g*) that you
are a teacher, critic and ecclesiastic (sp?)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Thu, 21 Oct 2004,
@ @ at 17:39:19 +0200, when Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
Hello Michael L. Wilson everyone else
21-Okt-2004 00:03, you wrote:
I know this and say this because I
Hello Anthony G. Atkielski
On 20.October.2004, 3:14 PM (Now: 20.October.2004, 3:50 PM),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AGA When I create a new rule and try to move it with Alt and the mouse, if I
AGA slip it downwards instead of upwards, I usually get an access violation,
AGA like the message
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I had this bug with the same version that you have right now
I suggest you to upgrade to a more recent version of TB!
Uh, I only upgraded to this version six days ago. Do I have to upgrade
this product once a day, or what?
I've also noticed that this problem may be
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED] everyone else
20-Okt-2004 21:51, you wrote:
AGA When I create a new rule and try to move it with Alt and the mouse, if I
AGA slip it downwards instead of upwards, I usually get an access violation,
AGA like the message attached. Access violations then occur each time I
Hello Anthony,
old message...
AGA When I create a new rule and try to move it with Alt and the mouse, if I
AGA slip it downwards instead of upwards, I usually get an access violation,
AGA like the message attached. Access violations then occur each time I try
AGA to edit the filters, until I
Hallo Anthony,
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 21:14:48 +0200GMT (20-10-2004, 21:14 +0200, where
I live), you wrote:
AGA When I create a new rule and try to move it with Alt and the mouse, if I
AGA slip it downwards instead of upwards, I usually get an access violation,
AGA like the message attached.
What
On Wed 20-Oct-04 2:51pm -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had this bug with the same version that you have right now
I suggest you to upgrade to a more recent version of TB!
He has the latest version of TB!
I certainly wouldn't recommend that buggy beta to
anyone not on the beta list - I've
Roelof Otten writes:
What happens when you try to move the filter with the up and down
arrows in the toolbar?
I haven't tried it. Next time I'll try that and see what happens. I
don't create new rules very often.
--
Anthony
__
Using The Bat!
Michael L. Wilson writes:
I would like to speak a little about operating system stability and
the Bat!. The Bat is written in a very high level language that does
not touch deep operating system problems. Since the Bat! only works
on Windows machines, people really need to look to their OS
Hi
Tuesday, August 31, 2004, 10:34:40 PM, Mike email (The Bat!) wrote:
MeTB Hi
MeTB Trying to PGP sign or encrypt has started giving me
MeTB Access Violation at address 00404044 in module 'thebat.exe'.
MeTB Read of address F28B12E7.
MeTB This was happening very occasionally but is now
Hello Bill,
BM Hello TB User Discussion List,
BM I sent myself a URL to print at a remote location. Clicking on the
BM URL with Outlook worked fine. Clicking with TB! produced this
BM message:
BM Access violation at address 39636A78. Read of address 39636A78.
BM After that message, the
Hello Bill,
On Sun, 13 Jun 2004 01:42:25 -0500 GMT (13/06/2004, 13:42 +0700 GMT),
Bill McCarthy wrote:
BM Access violation at address 39636A78. Read of address 39636A78.
I didn't get an AV, only an error dialog saying that ieexplore.exe
couldn't be found.
BM After that message, the hour
On Sun 13-Jun-04 1:56am -0500, Tony wrote:
The MapQuest url opens fine here...
Could it be that the browser the remote location chokes on the URL?
Thanks for checking, Tony. Both locations are using I.E. 6. The odd
thing is that the failure is occurring on my laptop machine - the one
from
On Sun 13-Jun-04 2:00am -0500, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
I use mapquest a lot, so I just manually went from Bowie St in San
Antonio to Presidential Blvd in Austin on the website. I cp'ed the
resulting URL into a message in TB, which I sent to myself. I confirm
the same error occurs.
I
Hi Tony,
On Sunday, June 13, 2004, at 12:54:48 AM PST, you wrote:
I assume TB! uses MSIE' engine to render the pages; so maybe that
conficts..?
Eek! Please don't assume such a horrible thing! :-) One of TB!'s many
strengths is that it uses its own HTML rendering engine. This is why
it's not
Hallo Bill,
On Sun, 13 Jun 2004 01:42:25 -0500GMT (13-6-2004, 8:42 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
BM I sent myself a URL to print at a remote location. Clicking on the
BM URL with Outlook worked fine. Clicking with TB! produced this
BM message:
BM Access violation at address 39636A78.
Hallo Tony,
On Sun, 13 Jun 2004 11:02:28 +0200GMT (13-6-2004, 11:02 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
T Damn! Exposed as a newbie again... :)
Don't worry, that'll pass over the years.
T It makes me wonder why TB! doesn't fully render HTML then.
T I mean the HTML with little red crosses where
Hello Tony,
On Sun, 13 Jun 2004 12:10:24 +0200 GMT (13/06/2004, 17:10 +0700 GMT),
Tony wrote:
T Many people are on always-on connections nowadays
What makes you say that? I know *nobody* who is always on at home over
here, and only *some companies* who can afford to.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Tony, [T] wrote:
Maybe we are talking about different things? Almost all people I
know are on ADSL/SDSL/Cable. Much cheaper then dail-up. ADSL is a
booming market here.
:) All the people I know around me speak English.
I was in Japan a couple years ago and met people from many countries.
Hello Tony,
On Sun, 13 Jun 2004 13:01:33 +0200 GMT (13/06/2004, 18:01 +0700 GMT),
Tony wrote:
T Many people are on always-on connections nowadays
TF What makes you say that? I know *nobody* who is always on at home over
TF here, and only *some companies* who can afford to.
T Maybe we are
Tony, [T] wrote:
Now you are mainly talking about spam I think? I tackle spam by
other means.
The let them come approach? How about approaching it from a broader
POV. If the spammers have less addresses to spam, then they'll likely
use less Internet bandwidth sending spam. The bandwidth being
Thomas Fernandez, [TF] wrote:
T Much cheaper then dail-up.
ISDN is close to unaffordably expensive.
Ha! I forgot to mention that part. I pay USD$130/month for my ADSL
connection (768/256 Kbps). That is by no means cheap either.
--
-=[ Allie ]=- (List Moderator and fellow end-user)
PGPKeys:
Hello Allie,
On Sun, 13 Jun 2004 06:58:52 -0500 GMT (13/06/2004, 18:58 +0700 GMT),
Allie Martin wrote:
ISDN is close to unaffordably expensive.
AM Ha! I forgot to mention that part. I pay USD$130/month for my ADSL
AM connection (768/256 Kbps). That is by no means cheap either.
No, not cheap
On Sunday, June 13, 2004, 12:54:28 PM, Allie Martin wrote:
Hmmm. This shouldn't be the case. It should open and I confirm your
problem. Seems like a bug. Can anyone else confirm this. I'll bring it
up on TBBETA
I cannot confirm this. Double-clicking on the HTML file results in the
opening
Tony, [T] wrote:
Can I explicitly tell TB! to use a certain browser to render a page?
No. TB! will use the default browser for the system.
--
-=[ Allie ]=- (List Moderator and fellow end-user)
PGPKeys: http://key.ac-martin.com
Running The Bat! v2.11.04 on WinXP Pro (SP1)
pgp6mqDgVOqad.pgp
Julian Beach (Lists), [JB] wrote:
Hmmm. This shouldn't be the case. It should open and I confirm your
problem. Seems like a bug. Can anyone else confirm this. I'll bring it
up on TBBETA
I cannot confirm this. Double-clicking on the HTML file results in the
opening warning. If I choose YES
On Sunday, June 13, 2004, 1:59:34 PM, Allie Martin wrote:
Ok. Your not confirming hastened my efforts to check further. I
changed my default browser from Netcaptor to Opera and it works now.
Is the problem with Message.html attachments that you open directly
from TB (without saving first) or
Bill-
Saturday, June 12, 2004, 11:42:25 PM, you wrote:
BM Here's one of the offending URLs:
Works fine here with Mozilla, but I have to say that is quite possibly
the longest url I have ever seen. Could you have run into an IE buffer
overrun?
--
-Mark Wieder
Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on
On Sun 13-Jun-04 2:54am -0500, Tony wrote:
So you browsed the site on your laptop.
Saved the url. And then get a crash when you open the same url on the
same laptop?
Yes, the URL was saved to an email and sent out. The AV occurs when I
click on that URL while viewing the email from the Sent
Hello Bill,
Sunday, June 13, 2004, 1:42:25 AM, Bill McCarthy wrote:
BM I sent myself a URL to print at a remote location. Clicking on the
BM URL with Outlook worked fine. Clicking with TB! produced this
BM message:
BM Access violation at address 39636A78. Read of address 39636A78.
BM After
Hello Bill,
Sunday, June 13, 2004, 10:59:00 AM, Bill McCarthy wrote:
BM Yes, the URL was saved to an email and sent out. The AV occurs when I
BM click on that URL while viewing the email from the Sent Mail folder.
I copied your URL to a new message and sent to myself. I then clicked
on the
On Sun 13-Jun-04 5:30am -0500, Mark Wieder wrote:
Saturday, June 12, 2004, 11:42:25 PM, you wrote:
BM Here's one of the offending URLs:
Works fine here with Mozilla, but I have to say that is quite possibly
the longest url I have ever seen. Could you have run into an IE buffer
overrun?
I
On Sun 13-Jun-04 11:06am -0500, Greg Strong wrote:
Sunday, June 13, 2004, 10:59:00 AM, Bill McCarthy wrote:
BM Yes, the URL was saved to an email and sent out. The AV occurs when I
BM click on that URL while viewing the email from the Sent Mail folder.
I copied your URL to a new message and
Hello Bill,
On Sun, 13 Jun 2004 10:59:00 -0500 GMT (13/06/2004, 22:59 +0700 GMT),
Bill McCarthy wrote:
So you browsed the site on your laptop. Saved the url. And then get
a crash when you open the same url on the same laptop?
BM Yes, the URL was saved to an email and sent out. The AV occurs
On Sun 13-Jun-04 11:20am -0500, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
I think it's something in the mapquest URL, as I don't have the
ever encountered the problem with other URLs.
Thomas, I'm sorry to hear you have the same problem but glad I'm not
the only one g. When I write the bug report, I'll include
On Sun 13 June 2004, 21:58:52 +1000, Allie Martin wrote:
ISDN is close to unaffordably expensive.
Ha! I forgot to mention that part. I pay USD$130/month for my ADSL
connection (768/256 Kbps). That is by no means cheap either.
Hmm, here in metropolitan Australia we are more fortunate than I
Nick Andriash wrote:
NA When I try to change the colour of the Even Quotation under
NA Options/Preferences/ViewerEditor/Plain Text/MicroEd I receive an
NA AV Error each and every time.
Hmmm. Not confirmed here.
--
-=allie_M=- | List Moderator
PGPKeys: http://key.ac-martin.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sunday, December 21, 2003, 7:59:44 AM, I wrote:
I'm using SecureBat Lite v2.02.8 CE
Hmmm? Sorry for the multiple postings... SecureBat's Connection Centre
seems to have stuck resulting in the multiple postings. I don't know what
happened but the
11-Sep-2003 20:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could it be the amount of mail I have ? My The bat folder is 200 MB. Maybe
not ever tested with great amount of mail ?
Since purge+compress has proven now and then to be a cure for many
problems, have you tried that? (purge+compress all
Hello,
We not get result :(
Is there files I can safely delete ? i could start with that !
If that does not help, I could install a second the bat on this machine, see
if it works normal, then start copying the mail folders one by one (without
conficuration files).. then start copying
11-Sep-2003 20:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
seems a good method to me.. not ?
If I were you, I'd rather make a backup with the internal backup utility,
completely remove TB, and then do a fresh re-install, restoring the backup.
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de)
One of
Wilfried-
Thursday, September 11, 2003, 11:44:57 AM, you wrote:
WM Just tryed it, but in most folders it say 'nothing to do' as I have setup all
WM my folders to cleanup on exit. Result is still same...
While we're on the subject, how about Folder | Maintenance | Check
Integrity/Repair?
Alexander-
Thursday, September 11, 2003, 12:21:03 PM, you wrote:
A If I were you, I'd rather make a backup with the internal backup utility,
A completely remove TB, and then do a fresh re-install, restoring the backup.
Ditto. The internal backup will *probably* save all the registry
setting,
Wilfried-
Hmmm. An access violation in Ntdll.dll sounds pretty serious. I don't
remember NT 4.0 very well, but maybe it's worth trying to restore this
file from the CAB files?
The /Users Depot/ area in the registry should correspond with the
account information you see in the accounts pane. I
11-Sep-2003 00:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmmm. An access violation in Ntdll.dll sounds pretty serious. I don't
remember NT 4.0 very well, but maybe it's worth trying to restore this
file from the CAB files?
...and don't forget to install ServicePack6a again. :)
--
Best regards,
Hello Thomas,
On Friday, February 7, 2003 at 6:10:12 AM you [TF] wrote (at least in
part):
I don't remember, but a dialog box of the bat indicating : access
violation to the adress , the next time I have it,i note !
TF Yes please. The dialogue gives you the address as well as the module
Friday, February 7, 2003, 2:09:48 AM, Peter scribbled:
PP Thomas, be honest: even _with_ this information we can only wildly
PP guess. The only being _probably_ able to hunt it down (if the module
PP is thebat.exe) are the guys at RITLabs.
PP But w/o these information even they will not be able
Hello telepro,
On or about Thursday, February 06, 2003 at 06:22:02GMT +0100
(which was 12:22 AM in the tropics where I live) telepro
postulated, ruminated and made these points on the subject of
Access Violation in x ?:
t Hello,
t I've sometimes (perhaps one time in a day) Access Violation
Hello Spike,
On or about Thursday, February 06, 2003 at 06:22:02GMT +0100
(which was 12:22 AM in the tropics where I live) telepro
postulated, ruminated and made these points on the subject of
Access Violation in x ?:
When I was a kid, I used to pray every night for a new bicycle.
On Thursday, February 6, 2003, 12:22:02 AM, telepro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
t I've sometimes (perhaps one time in a day) Access Violation in x ;
t it does not disturb the good running of the programm, a simple OK and
t the program continues...
t Have you got these little errors, if yes, in
Hello Mike Alexander,
On Fri, 7 Feb 2003 00:25:21 + GMT your local time,
which was Friday, February 7, 2003, 7:25:21 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Mike Alexander wrote:
Hi Spike,
Thursday, February 6, 2003, 12:18:27 PM, you wrote:
S This usually happens when a mail folder (messages.tbb)
Hello Miguel A. Urech,
On Thu, 6 Feb 2003 13:53:34 +0100 GMT your local time,
which was Thursday, February 6, 2003, 7:53:34 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Miguel A. Urech wrote:
Hello Spike,
NO! to bloat mail ;-)
He probably can can save half the space in that file by removing the
quotation at
Hello telepro,
On Fri, 7 Feb 2003 04:37:44 +0100 GMT (07/02/03, 10:37 +0700 GMT),
telepro wrote:
This usually happens when a mail folder (messages.tbb) gets
larger than 2GB. This exceeds the FAT32 file size limit. You'll
find that some mail folder can no longer accept new messages too!
Hello telepro,
On Fri, 7 Feb 2003 05:57:32 +0100 GMT (07/02/03, 11:57 +0700 GMT),
telepro wrote:
I don't remember, but a dialog box of the bat indicating : access
violation to the adress , the next time I have it,i note !
Yes please. The dialogue gives you the address as well as the
Hello Sudip,
On Thu, 18 Jul 2002 00:10:16 +0545 GMT (18/07/02, 01:25 +0700 GMT),
Sudip Pokhrel wrote:
SPJust upgraded to XP and I've been getting an Access Violation Error
SPdialog box upon launching TB! It doesn't appear every time I launch
SPTB! but after 2 or 3 launches. Any
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Sudip Pokhrel [SP] wrote:
SP Just upgraded to XP and I've been getting an Access Violation
SP Error dialog box upon launching TB! It doesn't appear every time I
SP launch TB! but after 2 or 3
On Thursday, May 2, 2002, 6:00:30 PM, Mark Knipfer wrote:
MK In TheBat! 1.60h compose window when I select Privacy | Encrypt when
MK Complete, TheBat! displays this error initially:
MK The Bat!
MK (X) Access violation at address 00431F43 in module 'thebat.exe'.
MK Read of address
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: MD5
Hi Kitty,
On 2:04:59 AM, Kitty Wrote
In regards To Access Violation in thebat.exe:
K Hi
K Strange problem. Have been using ver 1.54/10 for awhile. This is on
K a computer with Windows 2000. I left on the computer overnight with
K TB open, set
K
Hi A
On Saturday, November 03, 2001 at 21:54:20GMT -0500 (which was 8:54 PM where I live)
Allie C Martin wrote and made these points on the subject of Access Violation in
thebat.exe:
This may very well be a beta issue. Would you kindly confine problems
with beta versions to the beta list.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 3 Nov 2001 20:04:59 -0600, Kitty [K] graced us with these
comments:
...
K Strange problem. Have been using ver 1.54/10 for awhile. This is on
K a computer with Windows 2000. I left on the computer overnight with
K TB open, set to get mail
Ciao Thomas,
Thursday, February 22, 2001, 9:52:33 AM, you wrote:
T When does this message pop up: when he starts TB, or when he does
T certain actions (like checking mail)?
When checking mail.
SZ Exception EAccessViolation in module TheBat.exe at FFC0100A. Access
SZ Violation at address
Hi Stefano,
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001 10:31:58 +0100GMT (22/02/2001, 17:31 +0800GMT),
Stefano Zamprogno wrote:
T When does this message pop up: when he starts TB, or when he does
T certain actions (like checking mail)?
SZ When checking mail.
Do you think he can look at the log (shft-crtl-A) and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05 November, 2000, 6:34 AM, I saw Gerd's comments made on
Sun, 5 Nov 2000 11:19:11 +0100, and thought I'd add my $0.02 worth:
GE whenever I encrypt a message I get the following error:
GE "Access violation at address 00507BD2. Read
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello A. Curtis Martin !
On Sun, 5 Nov 2000 06:35:44 -0500 GMT your local time,
which was 05.11.2000, 12:35 (GMT+0100) where I live, you wrote:
GE whenever I encrypt a message I get the following error:
GE "Access violation at address
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 5 Nov 2000 14:35:13 +0100, Gerd Ewald wrote these
comments about 'Access Violation when encrypting with S/MIME':
GE I agree with you if it was a problem of the beta-version. I forgot
GE to write that this error occured with Version 1.47
89 matches
Mail list logo
