Hi
On Wednesday 20 March 2019 at 6:13:53 PM, in
, Steven P Vallière
wrote:-
> I am hoping and praying that this is some other way for
> TheBat to thread messages that is independent of and
> more reliable than similarity of subject lines.
The standard way of threading is by the R
Hello Steven,
On Wed, 20 Mar 2019 14:22:13 -0400 GMT (21-Mar-19, 1:22 +0700 GMT),
Steven P Vallière wrote:
> Oops. I found that I somehow got the threaded view
> setting turned off.
For "somehow", you might want to check the main menu:
View / Display Threads By
> However, I would still like
Oops. I found that I somehow got the threaded view
setting turned off.
However, I would still like to strip the annoying
" " from incoming subject lines so that the
subjects in the threaded view don't become hundreds
of characters long.
Is that possible?
--
Steven Vallière | tb 8.8.2 |
I am working with a customer that insists on prepending
the string " " to the subject line of every
message received from an address outside their own
domain. This destroys message threading by subject so
I am hoping and praying that this is some other way for
TheBat to threa
Outlook threading headers one day.
Even if Outlook/Exchange doesn't create the right threading info, are you
aware that you can Drag'n'Drop one message (tree) onto another message and
therefore can recreate the broken branch of the message tree? Also using
the Shift or Ctrl key while dragging you
Hi Simon,
Friday, September 12, 2008, 3:51:15 PM, Privateofcourse ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
For discussion lists this is the best setting that I've found (+ save the
view mode as 'expanded' so you're not forever clicking little +es) ...
Are you aware that once a root message is highlighted
Hello TBUDL,
I have noticed that when replying to messages sent to me by people using
Microsoft Office Outlook my replies aren't threaded. That is, the reply
isn't 'attached' to the original replied to message and appears as a
separate email in the message list.
I sort the 'standard way'
to message and appears as a
P separate email in the message list.
That's because the replies sent to you don't contain a References or
an In-Reply-To header, those headers store the threading information.
All versions of MS Outlook that I've run into use them.
When things are sent via Exchange
to recognise Outlook threading headers one day.
--
Simon (Privateofcourse)
#2283. Squaw Led I Mrs Roy ¶
TB! 4.0.34 WinXP Pro Service Pack 3
Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat
Hallo Simon,
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 11:19:39 +0100GMT (12-9-2008, 12:19 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
P Yes, you're correct. I just checked and the emails and they don't contain
P those normal headers. However, they do contain Thread-Index:, which seems
P to be a Microsoft specific header that
on how this breaks threading:
1. (i) A new email with a new 'subject' is sent from an Outlook client.
(ii) Outlook does not add a message-ID: header to the email.
2. (i) In The Bat! I receive the email and reply to the Outlook message
(ii) The Bat! does not include an In-Reply-To: header
Hallo Simon,
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 12:51:43 +0100GMT (12-9-2008, 13:51 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
P So, this is my take on how this breaks threading:
P 1. (i) A new email with a new 'subject' is sent from an Outlook client.
P(ii) Outlook does not add a message-ID: header to the email
Hi
On Friday 12 September 2008 at 12:51:43 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Privateofcourse
wrote:
I can of course thread by References and subject and received time
How? The Bat! only gives me the following 6 choices for threading:-
None
References (standard)
Subject
From
To
References
Hello MFPA,
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 15:05:03 +0100 your time, you said:
I can of course thread by References and subject and received time
How? The Bat! only gives me the following 6 choices for threading:-
Okay, more accurately, to get around it I meant this:
View Menu -
| Sort
Hi
On Friday 12 September 2008 at 3:51:15 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Privateofcourse
wrote:
Okay, more accurately, to get around it I meant this:
View Menu -
| Sort by:
- Received time
| View Threads by:
- References + Subject
Hi
On Friday 12 September 2008 at 2:53:22 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Roelof Otten wrote:
Ouch! Not only does Outlook 'forget' to insert the msg-id, but the
intermediate servers also forget about that, according to the relevant
RFCs that should be done.
Anyway there's nothing you can do
Hallo MFPA,
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 20:10:04 +0100GMT (12-9-2008, 21:10 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
Ouch! Not only does Outlook 'forget' to insert the msg-id, but the
intermediate servers also forget about that, according to the relevant
RFCs that should be done.
Anyway there's nothing you
Hello Tbudl,
Hope this wasn't covered somewhere before, I only found a very old
message from 2001 about this:
Did anybody find a solution to thread correctly the answers from
Outlook users replying with the german version of RE: namely AW:?
references+subject does not match in this case.
Hello Kelvin,
Thursday, December 14, 2006, 9:25:25 AM, you wrote:
Is there a way to retain the ease and functionality of the Sort by
Reference view but yet still retain the Gmail-way?
Gmail-way is the manner in which Gmail threads emails (as
conversations) and use date and time of the last
Hello Andre,
Thanks Andre! It works exactly like how I want it to.
With the growing popularity of Gmail, maybe this new thread sorting
should be the default way of threading.
--
Best regards,
Kelvin Quee
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+65 91773635
Sunday, December 17, 2006, 7:42:18 AM, you wrote:
Hello
Hallo Kelvin,
On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 10:39:07 +0800GMT (17-12-2006, 3:39 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
KQ Best regards,
KQ Kelvin Quee
KQ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
KQ +65 91773635
KQ Sunday, December 17, 2006, 7:42:18 AM, you wrote:
Hello Kelvin,
moderator
Note: This moderator's interjection is a
Hello Dan,
It works!
But the presented view is kind of hard to get used to. The relevant
information in the rest of the columns disappeared.
Is there a way to retain the ease and functionality of the Sort by
Reference view but yet still retain the Gmail-way?
Gmail-way is the manner in which
the threading, your attention
is also brought to threads where *new* replies have been made to it as
the message is pushed up to the top.
When I use the default TB behaviour, I keep missing new replies to old
threads - so much so that I now have a virtual folder that picks out
messages
Hello Kelvin,
Wednesday, December 13, 2006, 8:20:58 PM, you wrote:
snip
I notice that when new replies come into a thread, The Bat doesn't
automatically push the entire thread to the top. This is so even when
I sort messages according to Received time.
snip
You can change your default
On Tue, 7 Mar 2006 19:59:44 -0600, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hold down shift while dragging.
Thought I'd tried all key-combo's yet... once more then... thx!
--
Happy flappin'!
Corne' (aka Cory, The Batdmin)
Current version is 3.71.03 |
Hi 'Batters!
Today I've been trying the re-threading feature first-time, and
getting into troubles right away... :-\
Some contact's replies were not threaded, so I dragged them to the
most recent post - which worked quite well, to my delight.
Unfortunately, at some point I dragged the tree
Cory @ 3/07/2006 11:35:32 AM
re-threading loosing mail from view mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(*Is* there a way to unthread only certain messages?)
Hold down shift while dragging.
--
Chris
Quoting when replying to this message is good for you and me.
Using The Bat! v3.71.03 on Windows XP 5.1
Hi
On Monday 7 November 2005 at 2:55:21 AM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Thomas Fernandez wrote:
If you create a wishlist entry, I'll support it.
Marck created https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=2663
in March 2004 but the status is still new.
--
Best regards,
MFPA
Hello MFPA,
On Mon, 7 Nov 2005 12:10:30 + GMT (07/11/2005, 19:10 +0700 GMT),
MFPA wrote:
If you create a wishlist entry, I'll support it.
M Marck created https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=2663
M in March 2004 but the status is still new.
I added a supporting bugnote.
--
Cheers,
Hi
On Sunday 6 November 2005 at 2:12:30 AM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Wasn't there / shouldn't there be an option in the account
properties don't create message ID, or used the following
domain for mid creation: ?
I've not seen it in TB! but I believe there
Hello MFPA,
On Mon, 7 Nov 2005 02:40:24 + GMT (07/11/2005, 09:40 +0700 GMT),
MFPA wrote:
Wasn't there / shouldn't there be an option in the account
properties don't create message ID, or used the following
domain for mid creation: ?
M I've not seen it in TB! but I believe there
Hi
On Friday 4 November 2005 at 4:57:40 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Alexander S. Kunz
wrote:
the message-id contains the localhost netbios name
Is that always the case, or just the way MS had set it up for
previous versions of Outlook?
--
Best regards,
MFPA
Hello MFPA everyone else,
on 05-Nov-2005 at 12:45 you (MFPA) wrote:
the message-id contains the localhost netbios name
Is that always the case, or just the way MS had set it up for
previous versions of Outlook?
What the message id looks like in the part after the @ depends largely on
the
Hi
On Saturday 5 November 2005 at 12:02:36 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Alexander S. Kunz
wrote:
Hello MFPA everyone else,
on 05-Nov-2005 at 12:45 you (MFPA) wrote:
TB uses the domain name of the mail address, Opera's M2 uses the
local machine name, I don't know which way Outlook
Hi
On Saturday 5 November 2005 at 12:02:36 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Alexander S. Kunz
wrote:
TB uses the domain name of the mail address
Specifically, the Reply-to address set in Account properties, so
you can what you wish and then use the %replyto= macro in your
templates;-)
--
Hello MFPA,
On Sat, 5 Nov 2005 16:54:20 + GMT (05/11/2005, 23:54 +0700 GMT),
MFPA wrote:
TB uses the domain name of the mail address
M Specifically, the Reply-to address set in Account properties, so
M you can what you wish and then use the %replyto= macro in your
M templates;-)
Hello The Bat! UserList,
Oh, I started a thread recently called Re-Threading where I learnt
that if I set Thread ny References in View Mode/Thread by I
could drag and drop and Re-Thread faulty threads. And get the Good
look on mailing-lists.
However, I'm on lots of mailing list trying
Hallo Fredrik,
On Fri, 4 Nov 2005 09:15:38 +0100GMT (4-11-2005, 9:15 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
FB Well, I cannot be the only one? How do you manage to read
FB mailinglists other than the The Bat ones?
I display threads on reference+subject.
The lists I'm on hardly create a 'new
Recently, Roelof Otten squawked:
I display threads on reference+subject.
OK ... I would like to try this one too but couldn't find a selection
to actually *use* ref+sub as a filter
Some of the Lists I am on, the people change the bloody subject lines
but are actually replying to the correct
Robert D. @ 11/04/2005 8:56:12 AM
Constantly Re-Threading mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK ... I would like to try this one too but couldn't find a selection
to actually *use* ref+sub as a filter
View/View Threads By/Ref. + Subj.
--
Chris
Quoting when replying to this message is good for you and me
Hi Fredrik,
Well, I cannot be the only one? How do you manage to read
mailinglists other than the The Bat ones?
gmail and/or mutt. And I'm not kidding. They work.
Regards,
Roman
--
Chicago got started by a bunch of New Yorkers who said, Gee, I'm enjoying
the crime and poverty, but
there is only should, not must), you can forget about
threading by Reference on lists where multiple clients are used.
Outlook2003 doesn't even CREATE a message-id, because, according to MS,
users requested to leave it away because it is a privacy-issue: the
message-id contains the localhost
Recently, Chris squawked:
View/View Threads By/Ref. + Subj.
ohmygosh!! (said as fast as you can) I am so ST-pid.
Yup, I see that now. I likely saw it before but scanned my brain over
it
old age/ Bad Wine? /
--
Bye Now,
Robert D.
_
The Bat! Version: 3.62.11
I always loved the threading in previous versions of The Bat, but now in the
latest version it has the name of the sender as a title, and you have to
click the little cross to display just *one* message. I would love to get back
to
the old, prettier and easier way of threading without going back
lee walters @ 2005-Jul-1 3:37:39 PM
threading title mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I always loved the threading in previous versions of The Bat, but
now in the latest version it has the name of the sender as a title,
and you have to click the little cross to display just *one*
message. I would love
Friday, July 1, 2005, 9:44:12 PM, you wrote:
lee walters @ 2005-Jul-1 3:37:39 PM
threading title mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I always loved the threading in previous versions of The Bat, but
now in the latest version it has the name of the sender as a title,
and you have to click the little
lee walters @ 2005-Jul-1 6:00:12 PM
threading title mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Try View/View threads by/References.
Yes, tried that but wasn't quite sure about it. What does it mean by
references?
In the message headers, there is information that links messages to on
another. For example, since
Howdy Tony,
Monday, June 13, 2005, 10:02:27 PM, Tony wrotened:
Tony --On Monday, June 13, 2005 21:41:59 +0100 MFPA
Tony [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Who?
Tony I was going to say that as well!
Like Shergar only less legs. OR Lord Lucan... he only had two legs...
--
Have Fun,
| |
Hello Dwight,
A reminder of what Dwight A Corrin on TBUDL typed on:
13 June 2005 at 16:10:07 GMT -0500
two of the great mysteries of the 20th century on this continent
Oh them.
--
Tony.
Using The Bat! v3.5.26 Windows XP Home SP2.
Pentium IV, 2.4Ghz Home Built Desktop.
:gentoo:
Hello Victor,
On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 17:46:34 -0400 GMT (14/06/2005, 04:46 +0700 GMT),
Victor B. Gonzalez wrote:
VBG The option of threading by TO: Address seems so far a viable option.
VBG I really appreciate everyone hooting along in agreement. I assume
VBG this is an option many won't vote
Hello tbudl,
The aim is simple. How do I thread by TO: Address and NOT TO: Name
then Address? If this is impossible then:
How do I re-filter all messages in my database so to strip the name
from the recipient field and only leave behind the Address?
I am trying to filter against the
Hello Victor,
On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 03:37:49 -0400 GMT (13/06/2005, 14:37 +0700 GMT),
Victor B. Gonzalez wrote:
VBG The aim is simple. How do I thread by TO: Address and NOT TO: Name
VBG then Address?
I htink I saw the same request a few days ago. Nobody answered, and I
think it is not
On Monday, June 13, 2005, 10:23:56 AM, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
No, you cannot strip anything from incoming messages. The majority
of the TB community believes that it is unethical to alter incoming
messages in any way.
I don't remember ever voting on this.
In the state where I live, the
Hello Dwight,
On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 10:37:06 -0500 GMT (13/06/2005, 22:37 +0700 GMT),
Dwight A Corrin wrote:
No, you cannot strip anything from incoming messages. The majority
of the TB community believes that it is unethical to alter incoming
messages in any way.
DAC I don't remember ever
Hello Group
On Monday, June 13, 2005, 5:04:58 PM, Thomas wrote:
I agree with this. Every time I go to the ocean, I can actually see
that the Earth is a flat disk.
And there are never any reports of casualties falling off the edge
because all governments conspire to keep such incidents
On Monday, June 13, 2005, 1:12:06 PM, Jeff Gaines wrote:
And there are never any reports of casualties falling off the edge
because all governments conspire to keep such incidents secret...
what did you think happened to Jimmy Hoffa and Amelia Earhart?
--
Dwight A. Corrin
928 S Broadway
Hi
On Monday 13 June 2005 at 8:31:33 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Dwight A Corrin wrote:
what did you think happened to Jimmy Hoffa and Amelia Earhart?
Who?
--
Best regards,
MFPA
What is real? How do you define real?
Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP
--On Monday, June 13, 2005 21:41:59 +0100 MFPA
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Who?
I was going to say that as well!
--
Tony.
LM
Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
On Monday, June 13, 2005, 3:41:59 PM, MFPA wrote:
Jimmy Hoffa and Amelia Earhart
http://www.biography.com/search/article.jsp?aid=9283280search=
http://www.biography.com/search/article.jsp?aid=9341063search=hoffa
two of the great mysteries of the 20th century on this continent
--
Dwight A.
Hello,
The option of threading by TO: Address seems so far a viable option.
I really appreciate everyone hooting along in agreement. I assume
this is an option many won't vote against.
How then do I put in a feature request and be able to track it?
Also, if worse did come to worse
Victor B. Gonzalez
On Mon 13 June 2005, 17:37:49 +1000, you wrote:
How do I re-filter all messages in my database so to strip the name
from the recipient field and only leave behind the Address?
I think you would need to use something like X-Ray Mail Assistant
(www.xrayapp.com) for this.
Hello Marck,
That one's in the oven ;-). Stefan says he's added the function and
really likes it. It will be in with the next beta series.
Actually, Stefan says it will be available in 3.5 post-release :-)
--
Best regards,
Stefanmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
1.- Open Customise and for 'Select container:' select 'Main Form'. Then
click on down pointing arrow to the far right to expand Main Form and
select 'Message List Pop-up Menu'. This will show on the right window
'Current items' the context menu that you get when you right click on
the
Dear Steve,
@19-May-2005, 13:17 Steve Lee [SL] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to MAU:
1.- Open Customise and for 'Select container:' select 'Main Form'. Then
click on down pointing arrow to the far right to expand Main Form and
select 'Message List Pop-up Menu'. This will show on the right
It was Miguel, but I can tell you anyway. Right click any old toolbar
and choose Customise there.
Silly me. I wrote to Miguel and gave your name.
Thanks for the help.
--
Best wishes,
Steve Lee
http://jumbocruiser.com
Tel +44 7768 211612
Hello Steve,
Hi Marck,
I just got some time to do this then came to a grinding halt when I
could not find where to Open Customise. Your assistance here would
be greatly appreciated.
Although you say Marck, you replied to me. Anyway, I see Marck has
already given you an answer.
--
Best
Hello Steve,
Hi Marck,
I just got some time to do this then came to a grinding halt when I
could not find where to Open Customise. Your assistance here would
be greatly appreciated.
Although you say Marck, you replied to me. Anyway, I see Marck has
already given you an answer.
Yes
Dear Steve,
@19-May-2005, 22:35 Steve Lee [SL] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to MAU:
Although you say Marck, you replied to me. Anyway, I see Marck has
already given you an answer.
SL Yes and it works well thank you - now if only we could find a way to
SL do both next message and mark as read
Hello Steve,
Yes and it works well thank you - now if only we could find a way to
do both next message and mark as read in one go.
I don't know why but I have the feeling that it will be possible soon.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.5
Hello Steve,
Where would we download this version? Is that the beta version or the
current live download?
It supposed to be available this Monday, but we ain't finished with
fixes yet, so I suppose, the version will become available by the end
of this week as a post-release.
--
Best
This can be done by change message list column settings.
I do not see List Column under the Message dialog.
--
Best wishes,
Steve Lee
http://jumbocruiser.com
Tel +44 7768 211612
Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
Hello Steve,
Tuesday, May 17, 2005, 10:20:48 PM, you wrote:
I do not see List Column under the Message dialog.
It's in the View|Message List Columns
--
Best regards,
Stefanmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current
This can be done by change message list column settings.
Got it thank you.
--
Best wishes,
Steve Lee
http://jumbocruiser.com
Tel +44 7768 211612
Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
Dear Stefan,
I've added two more options to space bar
reading today:
Where would we download this version? Is that the beta version or the
current live download?
--
Best wishes,
Steve Lee
http://jumbocruiser.com
Tel +44 7768 211612
Hello Steve,
SL The way we did it in VA (sorry to keep bringing that up) was to always
SL have the threads opened by default
This can be done by change message list column settings.
SL Unlike in The Bat! and Outlook, the messages in VA never changed
SL status from unread to read in x seconds
Hello all,
I have just added a note to https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=1226
and would appreciate any support to it.
TIA.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.5 on Windows 2000 5.0 Service Pack 4
Hello Stefan,
On Sun, 15 May 2005 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ST I've added two more options to space bar
ST reading today: to move to the next unread message (requested before)
ST and to mark message as read when taking off the current message.
Hooray! thanks a lot for that.
--
Hello Richard,
ST I've added two more options to space bar
ST reading today: to move to the next unread message (requested before)
ST and to mark message as read when taking off the current message.
RW Hooray! thanks a lot for that.
No problem. I'm starting to think that I'm getting addicted to
Hello Stefan,
Anyway, it will become available in the quick fix release this
Monday night.
Indeed quick ;-)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.5
Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
Hello Steve,
SL Is there are away to automatically open any threads with unread
SL messages to save having to click one's way down the chain?
Funny enough, I was talking about the same thing a couple of days ago.
Basically, it's not a problem to expand threads automatically to make
unread
Hi Shefan,
I hope this helps. It would resolve all the threading issues at a
stroke now you have the improved system on v3.
The way we did it in VA (sorry to keep bringing that up) was to always
have the threads opened by default but use the Return key to move to
the next unread message. In use
So, I'm glad you like it. I've just been informed, via a post on
tbbeta, that the new beta series is already beginning.
Come over and help us, if you want to. :)
I would love to but as with VA I never got involved with the beta
program because my data is too previous and I dare not risk
Hello Steve,
On Sat, 14 May 2005 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SL Unlike in The Bat! and Outlook, the messages in VA never changed
SL status from unread to read in x seconds while reading. Instead, hitting
the return
SL key to move to the next message marked it as unread.
Oh yes please.
Hello Steve!
On Saturday, May 14, 2005, 6:11 AM, you wrote:
So, I'm glad you like it. I've just been informed, via a post on
tbbeta, that the new beta series is already beginning.
Come over and help us, if you want to. :)
I would love to but as with VA I never got involved with the beta
Hello Steve,
The way we did it in VA (sorry to keep bringing that up) was to always
have the threads opened by default but use the Return key to move to
the next unread message.
You can Customise that. I was used to using Return in VA and I have
always used it in TB and still do :)
Unlike
Hello MAU,
On Sat, 14 May 2005 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
M I also use a Space to mark a message as read (which was default in VA).
M So I just go Space and Return to jump to next unread.
How do you manage that? I can't get Space on its own to work? :-(
I also never use preview panes
Hello Richard,
M I also use a Space to mark a message as read (which was default in VA).
M So I just go Space and Return to jump to next unread.
How do you manage that? I can't get Space on its own to work? :-(
I changed the shortcut for 'Mark as read' to Space and 'Move to next
unread' to
Hello MAU,
On Sat, 14 May 2005 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
M I changed the shortcut for 'Mark as read' to Space and 'Move to next
M unread' to Return.
I should have been more specific, sorry. I can't get Space or Return to
be recognised on their own, only items that require two key
So at least we have one channel through which to reap the
benefit of your expertise.
I would not be so arrogant as to assume I had expertise but thank you
for that compliment. now how do I put in one of those smileys
everyone is so keen on?
--
Best wishes,
Steve Lee
You can Customise that. I was used to using Return in VA and I have
always used it in TB and still do
I bet you can not remember how to set the return key to move to next
unread message! If you can please do share it as that would be
fantastic. I tried to work it out but can not.
I also
Steve Lee @ 2005-May-14 2:14:59 PM
New version threading mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
now how do I put in one of those smileys everyone is so keen on?
Just type the characters for it: colon, dash, and close parenthesis.
:-)
Press F9 to view the source of this message and you will see that the
above
Hello Steve!
On Saturday, May 14, 2005, 1:14 PM, you wrote, in part:
now how do I put in one of those smileys everyone is so keen on?
Smileys work from text handles that call images. You cannot view them
in the Edit Mail Message window.
To view them in View Message windows of any kind
Hello Richard,
M I changed the shortcut for 'Mark as read' to Space and 'Move to next
M unread' to Return.
I should have been more specific, sorry. I can't get Space or Return to
be recognised on their own, only items that require two key strokes,
CTRL+RIGHT for example :-(
I explained the
Hello Steve,
You can Customise that. I was used to using Return in VA and I have
always used it in TB and still do
I bet you can not remember how to set the return key to move to next
unread message! If you can please do share it as that would be
fantastic. I tried to work it out but
Hello MAU,
On Sat, 14 May 2005 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
M I explained the trick in TBBeta, remember?
Yes and I even parked the message. I have all my TB parked messages in a
virtual folder and do normally look through them but not on this
occasion.
Thanks again.
--
Regards, Richard
Hallo Steve,
On Sat, 14 May 2005 12:37:28 +0100GMT (14-5-2005, 13:37 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
SL Hi Shefan,
SL I hope this helps. It would resolve all the threading issues at a
SL stroke now you have the improved system on v3.
moderator
Note: This moderator's interjection is a note
Hello MAU,
On Sat, 14 May 2005 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
M I changed the shortcut for 'Mark as read' to Space and 'Move to next
M unread' to Return.
However it would be even better to be able to assign one key stroke to
mark as read AND move to next unread message. I've tried but can't
Hello Richard,
However it would be even better to be able to assign one key stroke to
mark as read AND move to next unread message. I've tried but can't get
it to work, presumably because of key stroke conflict.
I prefer to have the two keystrokes because many times I jump from
unread to
Top posting, i.e., typing all your reply text at the top of your
message and following it with all quoted text below, is not
encouraged and we actually request that you not do so on this list
because
a) It makes it difficult to glean context from what you typed at the
top of the message
ago but
unfortunately development has been so slow that now the time has come
to move on as VA still has very poor html handling and nowadays html is used
a lot.
One of the nice things about VA was the message threading and there is
one feature I do not see in The Bat! by default but I wonder
1 - 100 of 588 matches
Mail list logo
