Hello marybull,
On Wed, 7 Jan 2004 11:48:09 -0600 GMT (08/01/2004, 00:48 +0700 GMT),
marybull wrote:
T When you view the original message, go to View / Follow-up to. Copy
T the references by highliting them and hitting crtl-C.
There is no Follow-up on my View menu. [...]
So I copied the
Hello Kitty,
On Wed, 7 Jan 2004 19:20:33 -0600 GMT (08/01/2004, 08:20 +0700 GMT),
Kitty wrote:
AdG It's just a new spammers trick to circumvent Bayesian filter
AdG detection. Press F9 to see the raw message body and you most
AdG probably will find an HTML-ized URL like this one:
Bingo. Had a
Hello Thomas!
On Thursday, January 08, 2004, 10:16 AM, you wrote:
TF I see Andre has helped you out while I was indeed sleeping!
TF Happy New Year to you too, and may all your mails be threaded properly
TF without much effort and your spam limited to a minimum. ;-)
Absolutely minimum effort
On Wed, 7 Jan 2004 19:20:33 -0600, Kitty wrote:
It's just a new spammers trick to circumvent Bayesian filter
detection. Press F9 to see the raw message body and you most
probably will find an HTML-ized URL like this one:
Bingo. Had a message like that and when I did F9 the below
popped up. I
Hello Nick!
On Tuesday, January 06, 2004, 7:12 PM, you wrote:
N Hello Mary,
N Tuesday, January 6, 2004, 5:38:22 PM, you wrote:
M ... I've seen a lot more of
M these two kinds of [Spam] mails, lately.
N Mary, I just noticed your Posting and saw that it was orphaned... in
N that there is no
Hello marybull,
On Wed, 7 Jan 2004 05:59:45 -0600 GMT (07/01/2004, 18:59 +0700 GMT),
marybull wrote:
SO: I create a Reply window, with quoted message in old account Mary
Bull. Then I create a New message window in new account marybull. Then
I cp message body, subject:, and to: fields to the
Hello Thomas!
On Wednesday, January 07, 2004, 10:28 AM, you wrote:
SO: I create a Reply window, with quoted message in old account Mary
Bull. Then I create a New message window in new account marybull. Then
I cp message body, subject:, and to: fields to the New window.
T I don't know what
Hello marybull,
On 7 Jan 2004 at 11:48:09 -0600 GMT [18:48 CET] you wrote:
m There is no Follow-up on my View menu.
Yes. It used to be called follow-up but was changed some time back. It's
now called 'references'.
m It does, under Headers, in the main account view menu, let me put
m References
Hello marybull,
On 7 Jan 2004 at 05:59:45 -0600 GMT [12:59 CET] you wrote:
m SO: I create a Reply window, with quoted message in old account Mary
m Bull. Then I create a New message window in new account marybull. Then
m I cp message body, subject:, and to: fields to the New window.
m I proceed
Hello Andre!
On Wednesday, January 07, 2004, 1:03 PM, you wrote:
snip
m There is no Follow-up on my View menu.
A Yes. It used to be called follow-up but was changed some time back. It's
A now called 'references'.
snip
m So I copied the References and put them in the proper place.
A That
Hello Andre,
Wednesday, January 7, 2004, 1:02:51 PM, you wrote:
snip
m I proceed in the New window to my answer, and from marybull I'm able
m to Send.
AW Ok. Try this: Look at the very bottom of the reply window. You'll see
AW several fields filled with different text. At the right there is
Hi Batpersons,
On or about, Wednesday, January 7, 2004, 12:18:07 AM, we have reason to believe that
Joseph N. wrote:
JN Techniques like you described are common devices intended to fool spam
JN tools that analyze text content in message bodies. Usually, though,
JN words like you described are
Hello marybull,
On 7 Jan 2004 at 13:28:23 -0600 GMT [20:28 CET] you wrote:
m Yes! roflol joy joy joy Yes! Yes! Thank you!!
*g* You're welcome. Glad I could be of help.
m I think so. I'm indebted to you for life. What do you want for a
m Valentine's Day present?
Oh, I don't know. I would say
Hello marybull,
On 7 Jan 2004 at 13:21:50 -0600 GMT [20:21 CET] you wrote:
m Thank you for the feedback. Since Thomas Fernandez is on the other
m side of the world, 12 hours ahead of my local time, I think he has
m probably long ago gone to bed--it being a school-and-work-night for
m him, most
Hello Andre!
On Wednesday, January 07, 2004, 4:41 PM, you wrote:
m What do you want for a Valentine's Day present?
A Oh, I don't know. I would say your mail was enough. When I read it it was
A already dark here but I could feel the sunshine. You certainly managed
A to make a big smile appear on
Hello Andre,
Wednesday, January 7, 2004, 4:42:35 PM, you wrote:
m ... I wasn't really expecting any more help on this until tomorrow
m [since Thomas Fernandez's time is 12 hours ahead of mine].
AW That's the beautiful thing about an international list like this: It's
AW never night - at least
Hello Arjan,
Tuesday, January 6, 2004, 6:24:11 PM, you wrote:
AdG On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 16:44:23 -0600, Kitty wrote:
First, I get several messages a day from a variety of different
supposed authors that just have random words and nothing else.
I don't really understand the purpose of this spam
On one of my accounts, actually the one for my workplace, I get some
unusual (to me anyway) spam and wondered if anyone had any thoughts on
how to filter it out. There are two variants of this.
First, I get several messages a day from a variety of different
supposed authors that just have random
On Tuesday, January 6, 2004 @ 2:44:23 PM [-0700], Kitty wrote:
addition congruent malnourished masterpiece patterson planetaria legacy washboard
coerce prognosticate rose edison burr bedim venturesome attica mutton seller
propel duff varsity shields ingrate mcclain continual memorabilia
Is
Hello Kitty,
on Tue, 6 Jan 2004 16:44:23 -0600 (2004-01-06 23:44:23 in .nl) in the
message with reference mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] you
[] wrote (at least in part):
K addition congruent malnourished masterpiece patterson planetaria legacy washboard
K coerce prognosticate rose edison burr bedim
On Tuesday, January 6, 2004 at 5:44:23 PM, Kitty wrote in the message
Unusual spam mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
First, I get several messages a day from a variety of different
supposed authors that just have random words and nothing else. I
don't really understand the purpose of this spam unless
Hello Kitty,
Tuesday, January 6, 2004, 11:44:23 PM, you wrote:
K On one of my accounts, actually the one for my workplace, I get some
K unusual (to me anyway) spam and wondered if anyone had any thoughts on
K how to filter it out.
I stopped trying (it worked rather good, but I had to keep
Kitty,
On Tuesday, January 06, 2004, Kitty wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
First, I get several messages a day from a variety of different
supposed authors that just have random words and nothing else.
Techniques like you described are common devices intended to fool spam
tools that
On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 16:44:23 -0600, Kitty wrote:
First, I get several messages a day from a variety of different
supposed authors that just have random words and nothing else.
I don't really understand the purpose of this spam unless it is
to just see if the mail bounces back or something.
Hello ,
Hello Mark!
On Tuesday, January 06, 2004, 5:21 PM, you wrote:
K I don't really understand the purpose of this spam unless it is to just
K see if the mail bounces back or something.
M Most of the time there's an HTML part too. Perhaps you have completely
M disabled HTML view?
M I think
Hello Arjan,
First, I get several messages a day from a variety of different
supposed authors that just have random words and nothing else.
I don't really understand the purpose of this spam unless it is
to just see if the mail bounces back or something.
It's just a new spammers trick to
Hello Mary,
Tuesday, January 6, 2004, 5:38:22 PM, you wrote:
Anyway, just thought I'd confirm to Kitty that I've seen a lot more of
these two kinds of mails, lately.
Mary, I just noticed your Posting and saw that it was orphaned... in
that there is no In-Reply-To header that I could see. I
On Tuesday, January 6, 2004 at 8:12:46 PM, Nick Andriash wrote in the
message Unusual spam mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mary, I just noticed your Posting and saw that it was orphaned... in
that there is no In-Reply-To header that I could see. I also of course
noticed that you are using The Bat so I
Hello MAU,
Tuesday, January 6, 2004, 7:03:44 PM, MAU wrote:
It's just a new spammers trick to circumvent Bayesian filter
detection.
M Well, they haven't circumvented my POPFile yet.
Popfile was working great for me also. I decided to use APOP on some of
my accounts. Unfortunately PopFile and
Hi [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Tuesday, January 6, 2004, 7:12:46 PM, you wrote:
NA Mary, I just noticed your Posting and saw that it was orphaned... in
NA that there is no In-Reply-To header that I could see. I also of course
NA noticed that you are using The Bat so I wonder why there was no header
NA
30 matches
Mail list logo
