Hello Benedict,
Don't compare apples to oranges ;) He's using a release version and you are
using an ALPHA.
Am posting with the Alpha. Have tested with the latest release too...
My apologies then :)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.85.03
between the common filters and were looking for it between
the account filters?
--
Groetjes, Roelof
Veni, Vidi, VCR - I came, I saw, I videotaped it
http://www.voormijalleen.nl/
The Bat! 3.86.03 ALPHA (beta)
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
1 pop3 account, server on LAN
OTFE enabled
P4 3GHz
2
Could I be losing my marbles, going soft in the cerebral department- or
might I be suffering from randomly disappearing filters?
I am certain I created a set of filters - some of which I am certain have
just disappeared - things that used to be filtered to various boxes have
suddenyl stopped
Hello Benedict,
I am certain I created a set of filters - some of which I am certain have
just disappeared - things that used to be filtered to various boxes have
suddenyl stopped being filktered.
Anyone suffering from similar symptoms?
My tbudl filter has dissappeared completely from
Howdy MAU,
Thursday, October 26, 2006, 6:57:53 PM, MAU wrotened:
Hello Benedict,
I am certain I created a set of filters - some of which I am certain have
just disappeared - things that used to be filtered to various boxes have
suddenyl stopped being filktered.
Anyone suffering from
Hello Urban,
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 08:31:31 +0200 GMT (31/08/2006, 13:31 +0700 GMT),
Urban wrote:
Can somebody please remind me of the file name in which the common
filters are stored?
U snip
Oh, and the folder structure is also in some file, IIRC. account.flb
or account.flx?
U Take a look
Thursday, August 31, 2006, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Can somebody please remind me of the file name in which the common
filters are stored?
snip
Oh, and the folder structure is also in some file, IIRC. account.flb
or account.flx?
Take a look at TBUDP.
Short link: http://makeashorterlink.com
Hello TBUDL,
Can somebody please remind me of the file name in which the common
filters are stored? I want to back that file up seperately, it is more
important for me than the mails themselves (because the sysad keeps
backups of the mails on the server).
Oh, and the folder structure is also
Hi
Is there any simple way of converting Outlook Express
message rules into TB! filters?
--
Best regards,
MFPA
The second mouse gets the cheese
Using The Bat! v3.80.06 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
Hello Marten,
Sunday, June 18, 2006, 10:47:30 PM, you wrote:
PopFile is the only fully-configurable and adjustable spam filtering system
that works properly with TB
Don't think this has to do with tb! but it is the only usable spam
filter for me. Now if there just weren't these crashes...
--
I propoase the theory:
PopFile is the only fully-configurable and adjustable spam filtering system
that works properly with TB
Discuss please...
Background:
I have now tried all the various options - having become concerned about
PopFile producing endless Sql zero byte files in my temp folder
Hallo Marten,
On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 21:47:30 +0100GMT (18-6-2006, 22:47 , where I
live), you wrote:
MG PopFile is the only fully-configurable and adjustable spam filtering system
MG that works properly with TB
MG Discuss please...
I don't agree with that. I'm using the spam filtering engine in
Hello Marten Gallagher everyone else,
on 18-Jun-2006 at 22:47 you (Marten Gallagher) wrote:
PopFile is the only fully-configurable and adjustable spam filtering system
that works properly with TB
If your only goal is spam filtering, SpamPal and K9 work just as well
and are lighter on the
Hallo Greg,
On Fri, 16 Jun 2006 13:54:25 -0500GMT (16-6-2006, 20:54 , where I
live), you wrote:
G Is there a way to copy many filters from an old email account to a new
G email account?
I suppose you want to copy all filters from an old account to a new
account, this can be achieved by closing
If your only goal is spam filtering, SpamPal and K9 work just as well
and are lighter on the resources than PopFile (and much faster).
OK have got K9 on the strength of that thought and I have to say I like the
interface and the configurability of it...
Thanks for the tip...
--
Marten
RFC 2822 (sec. 2.2.3) says, Each header field should be treated in
its unfolded form for further syntactic and semantic evaluation. But
TB! does not seem to do that; AFAICT, when TB! tries to match a header
field using a regular expression, it uses the still-folded field, full
of newlines. Can
could somewhat easily be implemented with a few
filters taking advantage of the 'user parameters' in the Filter System.
I tried and it didn't work. As I later found out there was a problem
with the syntax for using parameters with the %Calc macro. Well, this
has been corrected in the latest Beta
Hello MAU,
snipped
REMEMBER: This will only work with v3.72.07 (and hopefully with newer
ones).
***NOTE 3: I didn't try Common filters because sub-filters may not work.
See BT report https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4021
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using
TheBat-users,
How do I back up my filters and move them to another location/Bat
installation?
Global Options? What _is_ this?
--
greeting Best regards /greeting
author Peter Fjelsten /author
thebat version 3.65.03 Pro /thebat versionextras MyGate, AVG /extras
env. 4 POP3, 7 IMAP (UWIMAP
Hallo Peter,
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 21:11:52 +0100GMT (18-1-2006, 21:11 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
PF How do I back up my filters and move them to another location/Bat
PF installation?
PF Global Options? What _is_ this?
They're backupped either with account properties or global options
Roelof,
On 18-01-2006 23:38, you [RO] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
PF How do I back up my filters and move them to another location/Bat
PF installation?
PF Global Options? What _is_ this?
RO They're backupped either with account properties or global options in
RO the backup menu, but I
, as
others have pointed out, was the fact that you had all filters set to
continue processing.
Anyway, using 'Sender' has always been a bit confusing for me. I prefer
to use the 'Header field' condition even if I have to OR several header
fields.
Hi MAU,
Yeah, that could have been the problem
Hello Chris,
Yep, the filters seem to be working ok now. So, it was a combination
of two things I think. First was removing the tick from the 'continue
processing' option on each of the rules. Second was changing the Spam
rule from 'Sender contains {nothing}' (whic
h is what it was under
, as
others have pointed out, was the fact that you had all filters set to
continue processing.
Anyway, using 'Sender' has always been a bit confusing for me. I prefer
to use the 'Header field' condition even if I have to OR several header
fields.
Hi MAU,
Yeah, that could have been the problem
, as
others have pointed out, was the fact that you had all filters set to
continue processing.
Anyway, using 'Sender' has always been a bit confusing for me. I prefer
to use the 'Header field' condition even if I have to OR several header
fields.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain
Hi,
I'm having a problem with filters since upgrading to v3. In v2, I had x number
of filters which stopped messages from being placed in my inbox, and moved them
as they were received into certain folders. As the last filter (which I named
'Spam'), I had a filter with nothing in it. What
Hallo Chris,
On Thu, 5 Jan 2006 23:13:38 +1100GMT (5-1-2006, 13:13 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
C Can anyone give me some hints so I can try and work out why the
C filters don't seem to be working in v3?
You mentioned that you unchecked 'continue processing with other
filters'. The function
Hello Chris,
I'm having a problem with filters since upgrading to v3.
...
...
Can anyone give me some hints so I can try and work out why the
filters don't seem to be working in v3?
Three things:
1.- Exactly which v3 are you using?
2.- While you get your filters to work I would suggest you
Hallo Chris,
On Thu, 5 Jan 2006 23:13:38 +1100GMT (5-1-2006, 13:13 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
C Can anyone give me some hints so I can try and work out why the
C filters don't seem to be working in v3?
You mentioned that you unchecked 'continue processing with other
filters'. The function
Hello Chris,
I'm having a problem with filters since upgrading to v3.
...
...
Can anyone give me some hints so I can try and work out why the
filters don't seem to be working in v3?
Three things:
1.- Exactly which v3 are you using?
2.- While you get your filters to work I would suggest you
On Monday, November 21, 2005, 4:13:08 PM, Marten Gallagher wrote:
MG 3.6.24 is broken
___
You mean 3.62.14, right? I tested and agree with your observation, but
that functionality does not affect me (fortunately). The show stopper
with
Hello Jon Polish everyone else,
on 22-Nov-2005 at 15:00 you (Jon Polish) wrote:
MG 3.6.24 is broken
You mean 3.62.14, right? I tested and agree with your observation, but
that functionality does not affect me (fortunately). The show stopper
with 3.62.14 for me is its lack of speed. The
Hello Marten,
I then click back and look at the original incoming mail filter - ODD
- it ahs changed also to FROM instead of the TO
In other words it appears that the original takes the argument of the
copy when the copy is changed.
I think I saw it happen once the first time I tested last
Hi Marten:
I noticed that you are using 3.51.10. I am as well. May I ask why you
choose this version?
Jon
___
Using The Bat! v3.51.10 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
--
I never drink water; that is the stuff that rusts
Hi Marten:
I noticed that you are using 3.51.10. I am as well. May I ask why you
choose this version?
I have gone back to this because:
3.6.24 is broken: new messages created do not use the template set for a common
folder
when creating a new message. And this is an integral part of my
Has anyone else experienced the mysterious case of the disappearing filters?
I.e: set up a series of filters that sort incoming and outgoing to different
common folders
and then next day (or some time later...(?)) discover they have disappeared?
--
Marten Gallagher
Annery Kiln Web Design
I create a filter for an account to act on Incoming Mail to:
filter incoming mail TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] to be sent to Common Folder 'Beaford
Arts'
TB! Message Filter
beginFilter
UID: [A2F35320.01C5EE20.4AF9CA89.67A01CB1]
Name: Beaford\20Arts
Filter: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MoveMessage folder
Hallo Marten,
On Sun, 20 Nov 2005 22:31:22 +GMT (20-11-2005, 23:31 +0100, where
I live), you wrote:
MG I create a filter for an account to act on Incoming Mail to:
MG then copy and paste it to act on Outgoing Mail and edit it to:
MG So I change the Header Field from TO to FROM
That's rather
Hallo Marten,
On Sun, 20 Nov 2005 18:56:09 +GMT (20-11-2005, 19:56 +0100, where
I live), you wrote:
MG Has anyone else experienced the mysterious case of the disappearing filters?
Not here.
MG I.e: set up a series of filters that sort incoming and outgoing to
different common folders
MG
Hallo Jack,
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 21:09:13 -0500GMT (28-10-2005, 4:09 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
JSL Roelof, your suggestion looked considerably more elegant and I tried
JSL to make it work but, alas, it wouldn't. I eliminated ALL the strings
JSL and substituted for them just the @ sign. I
Hello Roelof,
Friday, October 28, 2005, 3:57:01 AM, you wrote:
RO Hallo Jack,
RO On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 21:09:13 -0500GMT (28-10-2005, 4:09 +0200, where I
RO live), you wrote:
JSL Roelof, your suggestion looked considerably more elegant and I tried
JSL to make it work but, alas, it wouldn't. I
Hi Bat! Fans,
1. I would like to move all my filters under one isp to Common filters.
Any way of doing this easily, without doing one by one?
2. Looking at a particular folder- any way to see which filter/s apply to
this folder?
3. Can received mail filters be automatically applied to sent
Hallo John,
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 18:25:32 +1000GMT (28-10-2005, 10:25 +0200, where
I live), you wrote:
JP 1. I would like to move all my filters under one isp to Common filters.
JP Any way of doing this easily, without doing one by one?
When you've got no (or just a few) common filters, you
Hi Roelof,
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005, at 15:06:35 [GMT+0200] (which was 23:06:35 Australian
Eastern Time) you wrote:
When you've got no (or just a few) common filters, you could close TB
and move the account.srb file from the account directory to the mail
directory. (account.erb when OTFE is enabled
Hello John,
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 23:14:18 +1000 GMT (28/10/2005, 20:14 +0700 GMT),
John Phillips wrote:
JP BTW what is OTFE?
That's TB's proprietary on-the-fly encryption. It makes your
messages unreadable to anyone who doesn't know your password - or to
yourself, if you happen to have a problem
Hallo Jack,
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 05:47:41 -0500GMT (26-10-2005, 12:47 +0200, where
I live), you wrote:
JSL I see that I have accidently mislead everyone by the content of my
JSL original text. I used the words individual folders implying multiple
JSL folder destinations when I should have said a
finally did what I should have done in the beginning,
namely 'if all else fails, read the instructions.' I was actually able
to find the solution by reading TB's HELP section on filters. I
learned that when using the ALTERNATIVES tab, each string, which
represents a different sender, must be in a 'set
Hello Mica,
Tuesday, October 25, 2005, 9:38:04 AM, you wrote:
MM -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
MM Hash: RIPEMD160
MM***^\ ._)~~
MM ~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Tue, 25 Oct 2005,
MM@ @ at 05:58:49 -0500, when Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
I can't seem to figure out how
Hello Bill,
Tuesday, October 25, 2005, 11:46:01 AM, you wrote:
BM On Tue, 2005-10-25, Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
I can't seem to figure out how to get a single filter to route
incoming mail to individual folders based on the sender field. I have
one name in the RULE tab under FILTERING STRINGS
Hello Stuart,
Tuesday, October 25, 2005, 8:14:08 AM, you wrote:
SC Hello Thomas,
SC Tuesday, October 25, 2005, 7:50:27 AM, you wrote:
TF Where are you?
TF I go to Account / Sorting Office. I go to Incoming Mail and I have a
TF General tab, not a Rules tab. I do not have an Alternatives tab.
Hello Jack,
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 05:50:49 -0500 GMT (26/10/2005, 17:50 +0700 GMT),
Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
JSL I am inferring from your reply that the later version of TB that
JSL you're using has a different method of filtering. Would what I'm
JSL trying to do be any easier with a later version of
filtering to but if
the requirements of which contacts filter to which folder changes
you would only need to change the AB groups and not the filters.
The filter is in the INCOMING MAIL folder.
Good.
--
Best regards,
MFPA
When you're through changing, you're
Hi
On Wednesday 26 October 2005 at 11:47:41 AM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
I see that I have accidently mislead everyone by the content of my
original text. I used the words individual folders implying multiple
folder destinations when I should have said a single folder
Hello one and all,
I can't seem to figure out how to get a single filter to route
incoming mail to individual folders based on the sender field. I have
one name in the RULE tab under FILTERING STRINGS and the remainder of
the names in the ALTERNATIVES tab. The filter is in the INCOMING MAIL
Hello Jack,
Welcome back.
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 05:58:49 -0500 GMT (25/10/2005, 17:58 +0700 GMT),
Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
JSL I can't seem to figure out how to get a single filter to route
JSL incoming mail to individual folders based on the sender field. I have
JSL one name in the RULE tab under
Hello Thomas,
Tuesday, October 25, 2005, 7:50:27 AM, you wrote:
TF Where are you?
TF I go to Account / Sorting Office. I go to Incoming Mail and I have a
TF General tab, not a Rules tab. I do not have an Alternatives tab.
He is using version 2.11.02 which uses the old filtering system. I
Hello Stuart,
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 08:14:08 -0500 GMT (25/10/2005, 20:14 +0700 GMT),
Stuart Cuddy wrote:
SC He is using version 2.11.02 which uses the old filtering system.
Oops, my bad.
SC I don't remember how to use the old system and I don't have access
SC to an old copy.
Me neither.
...but as for this part down...
I have one name in the RULE tab under FILTERING STRINGS and the
remainder of the names in the ALTERNATIVES tab. The filter is in the
INCOMING MAIL folder.
...I am not sure if you would have to check under _Options_ tab the
Continue processing with other filters
On Tue, 2005-10-25, Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
I can't seem to figure out how to get a single filter to route
incoming mail to individual folders based on the sender field. I have
one name in the RULE tab under FILTERING STRINGS and the remainder of
the names in the ALTERNATIVES tab. The filter
Hi, everyone. Is it possible to copy filtering rules from one mail
account to another mail account,or, must I recreate the individual
rules for each filter in the second mail account?
--
Avi
Avram Sacks
Chicago, IL
using The Bat ver. 1.62r on Windows XP Professional
?
Depends on what you want to do.
When you've created a new account and you want to copy all filters
from your old account to your new, you can copy the account.srb file
from the old to the new account directory. (with TB closed)
When it's just a few filters you can copy them one at a time and paste
Hello Roelof,
In response to my query about copying filtering rules from one mail
account to another mail account, you wrote:
RO Depends on what you want to do.
***
RO When it's just a few filters you can copy them one at a time and paste
RO them to your new account.
***
I only want to copy
Hello Achdut18,
On Mon, 4 Jul 2005 01:35:26 -0500GMT Achdut18 wrote:
A Is it possible to copy filtering rules from one mail account to
A another mail account,or, must I recreate the individual rules for
A each filter in the second mail account?
In version 1.62r you can copy by selecting the
Hallo Achdut18,
On Mon, 4 Jul 2005 02:05:11 -0500GMT (4-7-2005, 9:05 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
A I only want to copy a few of the filters from the old account to the
A new account. I will be dumping most of the remaining filters along
A with the old account. However, how do I copy them
Hallo Claude,
On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 07:15:02 +0200GMT (23-6-2005, 7:15 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
CR I would like to only save TB filter and not all the configuration.
CR So how to do this ?
CR P.S. : I can not copy the file containing filters as I use OTFE and I plan
CR on giving it up
not copy the file containing filters as I use OTFE and I plan
CR on giving it up ...
RO Open a text editor
RO Open the sorting office
RO Select your first filter
RO Press Crtl-C
RO Switch to your text editor
RO Press Ctrl-V
RO Switch to the sorting office
...
For a filter type (incoming for example
can select multiple filters.
--
Groetjes, Roelof
If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you!
The Bat! 3.5.30
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
1 pop3 account, server on LAN
OTFE enabled
P4 3GHz
2 GB RAM
pgpzNrdyTKHSo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
I plan to reformat my ar disk and reinstall everything from
scratch.
I would like to only save TB filter and not all the configuration.
So how to do this ?
P.S. : I can not copy the file containing filters as I use OTFE and I plan
on giving it up ...
Greetings,
--
Claude Renaud
Hi
On Saturday 28 May 2005 at 4:28:30 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], MAU wrote:
Do the Statistics for this filter show that it is being tested?
Where do you view those statistics, please?
--
Best regards,
MFPA
What is real? How do you define real?
Using The
Hello MFPA,
Where do you view those statistics, please?
That's new to the latest release (an Statistics tab in filters), not
available in v3.0.1.33 you are using.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.5.21
Hi
On Sunday 29 May 2005 at 1:15:33 AM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Robin Anson wrote:
That is peculiar, I have no problems with filters not updating
themselves when I move folders around. They even follow folders moved
across accounts as well as in and out of the folder tree.
Strange
Hi
On Sunday 29 May 2005 at 4:41:23 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], MAU wrote:
That's new to the latest release (an Statistics tab in filters), not
available in v3.0.1.33 you are using.
That explains why I can't find it ;-)
--
Best regards,
MFPA
Don't
Hi
On Sunday 29 May 2005 at 4:59:20 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], MFPA wrote:
MoveMessage AutoFolder folder
I note that in the filters posted by Anthony in the previous
thread (mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) that line was
MoveMessage folder
without the AutoFolder
--
Best regards,
MFPA
I just upgraded to 3.5 from 3.0, and my filters don't seem to work the
way they used to. Filters that checked the recipient fields for a
specific address and moved the message to a specific folder no longer
seem to work; instead the messages are falling into a catch-all filter
at the end
Hello Anthony,
Filters that checked the recipient fields for a specific address and
moved the message to a specific folder no longer seem to work;
Can you copy (Ctrl+C) one of these filters and paste it (Ctrl+V) in a
message here so we can take a look?
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El
Hi
On Friday 27 May 2005 at 10:51:46 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Peter Ouwehand
wrote:
No problem using this one. IIRC, renaming/moving folders and NFS, was
fixed before the 3.5 release.
Thanks. I'll look forward to that when I get around to updating.
I don't often move or rename folders
MAU writes:
Can you copy (Ctrl+C) one of these filters and paste it (Ctrl+V) in a
message here so we can take a look?
TB! Message Filter
beginFilter
UID: [2D75BAD5.01C4C06A.1734AE5E.04E421D8]
Name: The\20Bat
Filter: {\0D\0A\20`5`15`^Reply-to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/5C.dutaint/5C.com\0D\0A
Hello Anthony,
Filter:
{\0D\0A\20`5`15`^Reply-to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/5C.dutaint/5C.com\0D\0A}
This, in a more readable form is:
Header matches all as RegExp ^Reply-to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I seem to recall there were some issues with RegExp in latest
betas/releases. In any case, I would suggest
: [2D75BAD5.01C4C06A.1734AE5E.04E421D8]
Name: The\20Bat
Filter: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MoveMessage folder
\5C\5C\5CLocal\5CIncoming\20mail\20by\20mailing\20list\5CThe\20Bat
IsSendQueue
endFilter
... but it still doesn't work.
I have multiple filters using different criteria all failing at once.
They all worked
Hello Anthony,
I just tried it: same result. The filter looks like this now:
TB! Message Filter
beginFilter
UID: [2D75BAD5.01C4C06A.1734AE5E.04E421D8]
Name: The\20Bat
Filter: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MoveMessage folder
MAU writes:
Is your new filter active? It wasn't you you copied it.
It is now. In fact, it fires, but the message is not moved. I added an
action to change the color of the subject line, and it works, but the
message is not being moved. This is the current filter:
TB! Message Filter
Apparently it has something to do with arranging filters in a hierarchy.
Something has changed in the code. Can anyone tell me exactly what
changed, or should I just roll dice to figure it out?
--
Anthony
__
Using The Bat! v3.5 on Windows XP 5.1
Hello Anthony,
MoveMessage folder
\5C\5C\5CLocal\5CIncoming\20mail\20by\20mailing\20list\5CThe\20Bat
Thos only strange thing I see is in your move action. The folder patch
starts with \\\ (3 of them) and I see that in my filters all of them
start with just two (\\). Can you try to edit
Hello Anthony,
Apparently it has something to do with arranging filters in a hierarchy.
Yes, of course. If a filter above the one in question is triggering and
is not set to Continue processing, the filter in question will not even
be tested.
Something has changed in the code. Can anyone
MAU writes:
Thos only strange thing I see is in your move action. The folder patch
starts with \\\ (3 of them) and I see that in my filters all of them
start with just two (\\). Can you try to edit this action and select the
folder again to see if it does make any difference?
All of the move
, it was executed. However,
the move action was not executed.
I don't recall any changes except perhaps to the was RegExp work.
I would suggest revising your filters and not use RegExp unless there is
really no other alternative.
Many of the failing filters made no reference to RegExp, so that's
Hello Anthony,
Clearly, the failure is related to the fact that these filters are
subordinate to another filter. Something that worked before in this
logic has been broken, and now it doesn't work. I suggest that the code
in that area be examined.
OK, you should have mentioned from start
MAU writes:
OK, you should have mentioned from start that you were talking about
sub-filters.
At the beginning I had no particular reason to suspect the subfilter
structure, and therefore no reason to mention it.
Are you perhaps also talking about Common filters and
sub-filters?
Yes, I use
On Sat 28 May 2005, 7:17:11 +1000, Mfpa wrote:
I just tidied up my folder list, grouping folders neatly under
related umbrella folders.
As soon I fetched new mail half the folders were duplicated in
their original places because the move to folder action in the
incoming mail filters did
Hi
I just tidied up my folder list, grouping folders neatly under
related umbrella folders.
As soon I fetched new mail half the folders were duplicated in
their original places because the move to folder action in the
incoming mail filters did not update itself when I moved the
folders around
Hello Steve.
--On 18 May 2005 22:21 +0100 you wrote about Re[2]: Proposal for spam
filters:
I use Spamcop and can only whitelist senders not receivers and the
sender is yourself not the bat.
In that case may I suggest http://www.firetrust.com/
--
Tony.
M.
pgpyNHfY2S1CE.pgp
Description
Hello Alexander.
--On 18 May 2005 23:30 +0200 you wrote about Re: Proposal for spam filters:
Well, the Sender of the list messages, according to the headers I'm
seeing, is Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED], while the From
field has the address of the message author.
Exactly what I said, add [EMAIL
Hello Steve.
--On 18 May 2005 22:21 +0100 you wrote about Re[2]: Proposal for spam
filters:
I use Spamcop and can only whitelist senders not receivers and the
sender is yourself not the bat.
I just visited the Spamcop web site, I clicked the Download Trial link
and it took me
Hello Tony,
-- just now (on 05/19/2005 at 09:32) you noticed:
In that case may I suggest http://www.firetrust.com/
BAD Sig!
-- just now (on 05/19/2005 at 10:17) you wrote:
Exactly what I said, add [EMAIL PROTECTED] to the white list if that's
the sender.
BAD Sig!
-- just now (on
I just visited the Spamcop web site, I clicked the Download Trial link
and it took me to the Mailwasher Pro download page.
It is Spamcop.net not spamcop.com - big difference.
--
Best wishes,
Steve Lee
http://jumbocruiser.com
Tel +44 7768 211612
Tony Boom:
http://www.firetrust.com/
I see that...
...MailWasher is still suggesting that you should bounce back unwanted
email to the spammer so it looks as if your email address is not valid.
That feature is a big problem, and I can't believe it is still in there!
--
St
Steve Lee:
It is Spamcop.net not spamcop.com - big difference.
Yes - spamcop.com is is someone trying to trade on SpamCop.Net's
trademark and reputation. spamcop.com's marketing tactics are down-
right un-sporting. Gotta ask yourself what FirstTrust's deal is in
this...
--
St
that was Tony's typo. His description is of
spamcop.net. I've used it on and off for years. And there is no
spamcop spam filter. If you're talking about a local Mailwasher
installation, then that's another matter. Here are 3 ways to define
filters for mailwasher to whitelist TBUDL messages.
[enabled],[1
@19-May-2005, 11:49 Marck D Pearlstone [MP] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Steve:
MP @19-May-2005, 11:27 Steve Lee [SL] in
MP mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Tony:
I just visited the Spamcop web site, I clicked the Download Trial link
and it took me to the Mailwasher Pro download page.
SL It
Hello Steve.
--On 19 May 2005 11:27 +0100 you wrote about Re[4]: Proposal for spam
filters:
It is Spamcop.net not spamcop.com - big difference.
No difference at all! Quoting direct from spamcop.net:
SpamCop is the premier service for reporting spam.
You still didn't say what software you
201 - 300 of 1605 matches
Mail list logo
