Re[3]: *.bmp attachment

1999-10-22 Thread tracer
Saturday, October 23, 1999 Hello Thomas, Friday, Friday, October 22, 1999, you wrote: Thomas> Hi tracer, (snip) Thomas> My computer also freezes after c ouple of hours of work and I also Thomas> suspected the same as you. A memory dump (mem/d in dos) does not Thomas> provide any evidence, so I

Re: The Bat! - bug report

1999-10-22 Thread tracer
Saturday, October 23, 1999 Hello Marck, Saturday, Saturday, October 23, 1999, you wrote: Marck> Hello The Bat! developers, Marck> I'm using The Bat! Version 1.36 Marck> under Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 Marck> and would like to report a bug Marck> The bug description: Marck> The

Re[2]: *.bmp attachment

1999-10-22 Thread tracer
Saturday, October 23, 1999 Hello Syafril, Friday, Friday, October 22, 1999, you wrote: Syafril> Hello tracer, t>> This is an oversized email, anything more then 2 mb should be t>> avoided. Syafril> Are you saying all picture document (*.html, *.bmp, *.jpeg etc) must Syafril> be bel

Date Presentation [was Re[2]: Clock syncing]

1999-10-22 Thread Philippe Gouillou
Bonjour, I'd like to have the possibility in a Reply to have the date in reference to UTC (as we can find it in the Kludges). See the exemple below (one of the last mails of Steve Lamb) : The real date of the message of Steve Lamb is : "Date: Fri, 22 Oct 1999 22:47:02 -0700"

Re[2]: Clock syncing

1999-10-22 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo Steve, On Saturday, October 23, 1999, 1:47:02 PM, Steve Lamb wrote: >> Let me make myself look stupid: Where can I donwload such a >> clock-syncronizer? Is it freeware? And does it work for LAN's as well >> (Novell Netware)? SL> The one I use is Automachron which is free SL>

Re[2]: Clock syncing

1999-10-22 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo Ali, On Saturday, October 23, 1999, 12:02:29 PM, Ali Martin wrote: >> Let me make myself look stupid: Where can I donwload such a >> clock-syncronizer? Is it freeware? And does it work for LAN's as well >> (Novell Netware)? AM> 'Horas' which I use isn't freeware. It's available at: AM>

Re: Chinese Character Set

1999-10-22 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo Syafril, On Friday, October 22, 1999, 11:10:30 PM, Syafril Hermansyah wrote: SH> I found something this morning, maybe you'd like to know. SH> I installed The Bat! international language pack, and this morning I SH> got a message from China (*.cn), which write his name in China

Re: Clock syncing

1999-10-22 Thread Steve Lamb
Friday, October 22, 1999, 8:19:07 PM, Thomas wrote: > Let me make myself look stupid: Where can I donwload such a > clock-syncronizer? Is it freeware? And does it work for LAN's as well > (Novell Netware)? The one I use is Automachron which is free --

Re: THE BAT! Will it be a newsreader option ?

1999-10-22 Thread Steve Lamb
On Sat, Oct 23, 1999 at 01:07:32PM +0900, Leif Gregory wrote: > I would much rather use separate pieces of software that are "masters" > than one kludged together bloated pig that can do a little bit of > everything. Not to mention that with the common trend of trying to stuff everything into

Re: THE BAT! Will it be a newsreader option ?

1999-10-22 Thread Steve Lamb
On Fri, Oct 22, 1999 at 10:54:47PM +0200, DOLIST Support Information wrote: > THE BAT! already does most of the e-mail job, any chance > to have newsgroup read/send. I hope it is a complete 0. > Think of it, all in one is better to switch between many software and > Outlook/Communicator inte

Re: Missing Attachments

1999-10-22 Thread Leif Gregory
Keith, On Saturday, October 23, 1999, at 4:04 you wrote: KR> Hello, everyone. KR> Twice now, I have received messages with attachments, but the KR> attachment did not show up in TB. There was no attachment pane and KR> no attachment icon in the message list. Take another look at the massage in

Re: THE BAT! Will it be a newsreader option ?

1999-10-22 Thread Leif Gregory
DOLIST, On Saturday, October 23, 1999, at 5:54 you wrote: DSI> Hello, DSI> THE BAT! already does most of the e-mail job, any chance to have DSI> newsgroup read/send. DSI> Think of it, all in one is better to switch between many software DSI> and Outlook/Communicator integrates both mail and new

Re: Clock syncing

1999-10-22 Thread Ali Martin
Hi all, On Friday, October 22, 1999, 10:19:07 PM (-5 GMT), Thomas scribbled: ==8<=== > Let me make myself look stupid: Where can I donwload such a > clock-syncronizer? Is it freeware? And does it work for LAN's as well > (Novell Netware)? 'Horas' which I use isn't freeware. It's available at:

Re: Missing Attachments

1999-10-22 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hi Keith, on Saturday, October 23, 1999, 3:04:20 AM, Keith Russell wrote: KR> Twice now, I have received messages with attachments, but the KR> attachment did not show up in TB. There was no attachment pane and KR> no attachment icon in the message list. KR> Both times, I downloaded the

Clock syncing

1999-10-22 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hi Steve, on Friday, October 22, 1999, 11:50:09 PM, Steve Lamb wrote: SL> For me, syncing my server off a tier 2 clock and syncing the rest off SL> my server is good enough. I simply don't need to be in the <3-5 second SL> catagory and don't mind that much drift at all. It is precise enoug

Re: THE BAT! Will it be a newsreader option ?

1999-10-22 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hi DOLIST, on Saturday, October 23, 1999, 4:54:47 AM, DOLIST Support Information wrote: DSI> THE BAT! already does most of the e-mail job, any chance DSI> to have newsgroup read/send. DSI> We would imagine a new folder in the account, where you set it up that this DSI> is a newgroup reader/post

Re[3]: Address Book file format

1999-10-22 Thread Juan Manuel
Hi, tracer. t> You donot have to read their format as long a you have a suitable export t> format and the more standard the less headache and the more chance a program t> exists to do what you want to do. Yup... But I like to work directly on the original file... Otherwise I have to expor

Re: Missing Attachments

1999-10-22 Thread Gerald Birkenstock
Hello Keith, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote at: > Twice now, I have received messages with attachments, but the > attachment did not show up in TB. There was no attachment pane and > no attachment icon in the message list. > Has anyone else seen this? Yes, this just happened to me with an e-mail from

problems with messages PGP signed by me

1999-10-22 Thread Patrick Erler
Hi! I have trouble with signing and checking messages... When I send a message to myself and sign the WHOLE message with PGP and check the received message i get a "not valid". If I do the same with just a BLOCK - everything is fine. I suspect that the bat is changing the message when it sends

THE BAT! Will it be a newsreader option ?

1999-10-22 Thread DOLIST Support Information
Hello, THE BAT! already does most of the e-mail job, any chance to have newsgroup read/send. We would imagine a new folder in the account, where you set it up that this is a newgroup reader/post, wich will have account signature and so on associated. Think of it, all in one is better to switch

The Bat! - bug report

1999-10-22 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
Hello The Bat! developers, I'm using The Bat! Version 1.36 under Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 and would like to report a bug The bug description: The address auto-view no longer displays pictures from address book entries Steps to reproduce the bug: Look at one for

Missing Attachments

1999-10-22 Thread Keith Russell
Hello, everyone. Twice now, I have received messages with attachments, but the attachment did not show up in TB. There was no attachment pane and no attachment icon in the message list. Both times, I downloaded the message with Becky and the attachment was there, and usable. Has any

Re: (No Subject)

1999-10-22 Thread Steve Lamb
Friday, October 22, 1999, 10:18:01 AM, Ali wrote: > Why aren't there more errors as there probably should be when using > the received time? Is it because the messages are all about the same > size leading to no significant holdups with one message as opposed to > another or is it that it's rare f

Re: (No Subject)

1999-10-22 Thread Ali Martin
Hi all, On Friday, October 22, 1999, 11:18:44 AM (-5 GMT), Steve scribbled: > Friday, October 22, 1999, 9:11:57 AM, Ali wrote: >> messages may have the same time but the order in which they're listed >> reflects the order in which TBUDL server got the messages. > Well, in theory, ye

Re[2]: (No Subject)

1999-10-22 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
On 22 October 1999 at 16:28, [EMAIL PROTECTED] told the list: SL> SL> Always good to have a tool to reset your PC's clock to one of the tier 2 SL> servers. Personally I have my server syncing with 3-4 tier 2 servers and all SL> my other machines sync off it. I generally don't see more than

Re: (No Subject)

1999-10-22 Thread Steve Lamb
Friday, October 22, 1999, 9:11:57 AM, Ali wrote: > messages may have the same time but the order in which they're listed > reflects the order in which TBUDL server got the messages. Well, in theory, yeah. However, it is possible that, say, two messages come in and while the first one is stuc

Re: (No Subject)

1999-10-22 Thread Ali Martin
Hi all, On Friday, October 22, 1999, 10:28:49 AM (-5 GMT), Steve scribbled: > Friday, October 22, 1999, 2:25:49 AM, Marck wrote: >> Message times are internationally corrected and usually work fine for >> sorting. Individual PC system clocks, however, are a law unto >> themselv

Re: (No Subject)

1999-10-22 Thread Steve Lamb
Friday, October 22, 1999, 8:39:43 AM, Nick wrote: > > I've never heard (or seen) the term "tier 2 server". Does this > differ from using one of the atomic clock sites to sync with? > Basically, yeah. The tiers are how far removed from the atomic clocks you are. Generally it is a bad ide

Re[2]: (No Subject)

1999-10-22 Thread Nick Danger
In Reference to "(No Subject)" From Steve Lamb: SL> Friday, October 22, 1999, 2:25:49 AM, Marck wrote: >> Message times are internationally corrected and usually work fine for >> sorting. Individual PC system clocks, however, are a law unto >> themselves ;-). SL> SL> Always good t

Re: *.bmp attachment

1999-10-22 Thread Steve Lamb
Friday, October 22, 1999, 5:24:39 AM, tracer wrote: > I have 256 mb ram and essentially it ends freezing after a few hours. > I suspect a nice leak in memory and non released resources due to > file openings and closures being the reason. I don't think this may be the case. I've worked with

Re: (No Subject)

1999-10-22 Thread Steve Lamb
Friday, October 22, 1999, 2:25:49 AM, Marck wrote: > Message times are internationally corrected and usually work fine for > sorting. Individual PC system clocks, however, are a law unto > themselves ;-). Always good to have a tool to reset your PC's clock to one of the tier 2 serv

Chinese Character Set

1999-10-22 Thread Syafril Hermansyah
Hello Thomas Fernandez, I found something this morning, maybe you'd like to know. I installed The Bat! international language pack, and this morning I got a message from China (*.cn), which write his name in China Character set. I change the language to china (Option|language|chinese

Re: *.bmp attachment

1999-10-22 Thread Syafril Hermansyah
Hello tracer, On Friday, October 22, 1999, 7:24:39 PM you told us: §yafril">> I just receive one attachment that make The Bat! "working §yafril">> hard". The message size (plus the attachment) only §yafril">> 3,316,620 Bytes (not big, right), but to view or open this §yafril">> messa

Re[3]: *.bmp attachment

1999-10-22 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
On 22 October 1999 at 15:12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] told the list: t>> Now on the other hand I have noticed that if the bat has been open t>> for a while and you edit and look many things, system gets slower t>> and slower. I have 256 mb ram and essentially it ends freezing t>> after a few hou

Re[2]: *.bmp attachment

1999-10-22 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hi tracer, on Friday, October 22, 1999, 8:24:39 PM, tracer wrote: §yafril">> Any explanation why TB so slow to view/open messages with *.bmp §yafril">> attachment ? [...] t> Now on the other hand I have noticed that if the bat has been open for t> a while and you edit and look many thing

Re[2]: Kill filters

1999-10-22 Thread tracer
Friday, October 22, 1999 Hello Steve, Friday, Friday, October 22, 1999, you wrote: Steve> Thursday, October 21, 1999, 10:46:19 AM, Andrew wrote: JM>>> Besides, how can I make kill filters to delete messages with empty "To:" fields? >> No way. At least with TB. Steve> There might be now wi

Re: *.bmp attachment

1999-10-22 Thread tracer
Friday, October 22, 1999 Hello §yafril", Friday, Friday, October 22, 1999, you wrote: §yafril"> Hello The Bat! List Member, §yafril"> I just receive one attachment that make The Bat! "working hard". §yafril"> The message size (plus the attachment) only 3,316,620 Bytes (not big, §yafril"> righ

Re[2]: Address Book file format

1999-10-22 Thread tracer
Friday, October 22, 1999 Hello Roel, Friday, Friday, October 22, 1999, you wrote: Roel> Hello Juan, Roel> Thursday, October 21, 1999, 5:45:57 PM, you wrote: JM>> Hi, friends. JM>> I would like to know the AB file format, so I can make a little application to JM>> handle some data stored in

Re: (No Subject)

1999-10-22 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
On 22 October 1999 at 08:21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] told the list: KR> I have been sorting my folders by creation date and time. KR> However, I've been puzzled by the fact that I see a lot of KR> responses before seeing the message responded to. KR> Is it possible that the creati