Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 8:01:35 AM, Ken wrote:
KM> Hello All,
KM> This may be a little off topic but wanted to ask your opinion. I've
KM> received several emails in the past two days that look suspicious. The
KM> last one read:
KM> Hello,This is a IE 6.0 patch
KM> I hope you would enjoy it.
Wh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, 1 May 2002 at 4:36 p.m. Julius wrote:
JS> How can we/you spend all our time nit-picking the program of our
JS> choice every time we sign-on to the net??
JS> Easier for me to go back to OE and not have to read 200 questions/
JS> day
Dear Lynna,
--->>> Lynna Lunsford / Mittwoch, 01.05.2002, 07:47:30
Anti-Virus
> 2003 would be NEXT year, as this is 2002 so the certificate is good
> for a whole year yet... Not understanding why that would show up as
> invalid. I just created and downloaded this new certificate from
Hello Eddie,
Tuesday, April 30, 2002, 9:33:34 PM, you digitally penned the following:
EC> Dear Lynna,
EC> --->>> Lynna Lunsford / Mittwoch, 01.05.2002, 01:15:03
EC> Anti-Virus
MD>>> Ever since you started using 1.60h, your signature has displayed
MD>>> as invalid.
>> That may be my
Hello Julius,
Tuesday, April 30, 2002, 8:36:13 PM, you digitally penned the following:
JS> Hi there, List members ,
JS> I signed-on and purchased my entry to the bat! about 2 weeks ago.
JS> I was expecting a reasonable new alternative to OE.
I purposefully searched for a different email clien
> Can we end this and get a decent product out of the bat! ? I think we should
> address our problems/questions/requests to the authors, in Russia or Belarus,
> and stop trying to outguess them and provide ideas that have to be tested
> every time, regardless of comments from "moderators" with cr
Dear Marck,
--->>> Marck D Pearlstone / Mittwoch, 01.05.2002, 01:13:29
Strange Email
> Discard the message. It is a virus. Then smile broadly and be
> thankful that you use TB!!!
... and after deleting from Trash you better Compress the Folders!
--
best regards
Eddie
Powered b
Dear Lynna,
--->>> Lynna Lunsford / Mittwoch, 01.05.2002, 01:15:03
Anti-Virus
MD>> Ever since you started using 1.60h, your signature has displayed
MD>> as invalid.
> That may be my fault, I havent used smime in a long long time and
> then I didnt use it often, I may have exported th
Good morning Marck,
--->>> Marck D Pearlstone / Thursday, 30.04.2002, 20:44:30
A problem using Opera at First Union Online -- I'm sorry ---
> ...
> Back to the lecture: every time I say this, someone takes exception
> to something I've said with comments like "'danger' is a bit harsh"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, April 30, 2002, at 9:36:13 PM PST, Julius S. wrote:
> Let's make this work!! Ideas??
Hello Julius,
I don't know about you, but my Bat works perfectly well for 99.9% of
what I want it to do. In fact, most of the time, that's 100%.
I re
Ken & Marilyn
Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 8:27:28 AM, you wrote:
> It had a message.htm with 136K of random characters, alphanumeric. It
> also has and attached file dEv.zlo. The other messages are about the
> same size but the attached files are; dEv.zl9 and author.zlq.
This is undoubtedly a virus
Hi there, List members ,
I signed-on and purchased my entry to the bat! about 2 weeks ago.
I was expecting a reasonable new alternative to OE.
But all I see is about 200 e-mail exchanges per day!! about PROBLEMS with TB and
hopes for better versions etc.
How can we/you spend all our time nit-p
That is the print of Klez or Exploit MIME. Not sure which one.
__
Running Bat v1.60 on Win2000Pro 5.00.2195 Service Pack 2 with Advanced
Direct Remailer v2.15, Mcaffe Online Engine 4.1.60 DAT 4.0.4194 and
Zone Alarm 3.0.091
_
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Disabato [MD] wrote:
...
MD> Ever since you started using 1.60h, your signature has displayed
MD> as invalid.
I now see the problem.
When using v1.60h, you have to enable MS CryptoAPI for S/MIME. All
S/MIME signatures were invalid for me.
I
Hello Jan,
Tuesday, April 30, 2002, 8:09:16 AM, you wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
JR> Looking @ Account Properties -> Network -> Use Account
JR> Specific Network Settings: *only* "Connect to the Internet
JR> Using" is available as an on/off switch. No other option
JR> is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jan Rifkinson [JR] wrote:
...
JR> Looking @ Account Properties -> Network -> Use Account
JR> Specific Network Settings: *only* "Connect to the Internet
JR> Using" is available as an on/off switch. No other option
JR> is available. There are no
El martes 30 de abril de 2002, a las 21.14, Gene Gough decía:
GG> You have to have a license for Norton Anti virus to make it work. The
GG> Norton code you install on your machine provides full directions on
GG> how to use it. I understand that this may be different with the 2002
GG> version. I a
You have to have a license for Norton Anti virus to make it work. The
Norton code you install on your machine provides full directions on
how to use it. I understand that this may be different with the 2002
version. I am running the 2001 version. Basically you use a Norton pop
(pop.norton.antivi
Tue, 30 Apr 2002 23:26:40[GMT +0100] (6:26 PM EDST) Richard Evans
wrote:
> Hi TBUDL,
> On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, at 14:48:28 [GMT -0400] you wrote:
DG>> One thing led to another and the message was sent to the
DG>> wrong list.
> Thats fine but at the start of your message you actually say you "sen
E-Mail Message
~~
From: Gene Gough
Date: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 at 6:48 PM
Subject: Strange Email
_
GG> All that I
GG> received have been caught by the Norton site where all of my mail is
GG> filtered through.
___
That is a virus e-mail and you may want to run your checker. I have
been getting them since last Thursday, about 8-15 a day. Not all the
same subject or return address. One even had my address as the from
so you can't trust a know e-mail address as being valid. All that I
received have been c
Hello Michael,
Tuesday, April 30, 2002, 2:46:50 PM, you digitally penned the following:
MD> Tuesday, April 30, 2002, 3:32:06 PM, Lynna scribbled:
LL>> Using The Bat!1.60h
LL>> on Windows XP
MD> Lynna,
MD> Ever since you started using 1.60h, your signature has displayed as
MD> invalid.
MD> Mi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greetings Bat Listers,
This is your monthly message from the moderation team to remind you
of the primary purpose of this discussion list.
To review the list rules, follow the link at the end of this message.
...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Ken,
@01 May 2002, 16:01:35 -0700 (00:01 UK time) Ken & Marilyn wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hello,This is a IE 6.0 patch
> I hope you would enjoy it.
> It had a message.htm with 136K of random characters, alphanumeric. It
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Michael,
@30 April 2002, 17:46:50 -0500 (23:46 UK time) Michael Disabato wrote
in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Ever since you started using 1.60h, your signature has displayed as
> invalid.
Valid here using the CryptoAPI.
- --
Che
On Monday, April 29, 2002, 2:29 PM, you wrote:
glad I remembered this message. I upgraded to 160h and then all of a
sudden I started to get blank messages too. Wait, it was after I
switched PGP versions from 6.5.8 freeware to 6.5.8 ckt build07. At
least on win XP 6.5.8ckt 07 works with TB !!
tha
Hello All,
This may be a little off topic but wanted to ask your opinion. I've
received several emails in the past two days that look suspicious. The
last one read:
Hello,This is a IE 6.0 patch
I hope you would enjoy it.
It had a message.htm with 136K of random characters, alphanumeric. It
also
I have been for about six weeks now, must have missed it. Thanks.
Tuesday, April 30, 2002, 5:09:56 PM, Marck wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> Hi Gene,
> @30 April 2002, 16:49:31 -0400 (21:49 UK time) Gene Gough wrote in
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi TBUDL,
On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, at 14:48:28 [GMT -0400] you wrote:
DG> One thing led to another and the message was sent to the
DG> wrong list.
Thats fine but at the start of your message you actually say you "sent
it to Sue before sending it to TBUDL" !!
--
Using The Bat! v1.60c on Windows
Tuesday, April 30, 2002, 3:32:06 PM, Lynna scribbled:
LL> Using The Bat!1.60h
LL> on Windows XP
Lynna,
Ever since you started using 1.60h, your signature has displayed as
invalid.
Mike
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Tuesday, April 30, 2002, 5:17:32 PM, Ricardo scribbled:
H>> Nothing new in 1.60h. Just some bug-fixes.
RMR> I guess they should list the bugfixes too, don't you?
How about the new bugs? :)
Mike
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
El martes 30 de abril de 2002, a las 11.19, Haico decía:
>> Did, and it shows what's new in 1.60 and 1.60c but I don't
>> see 1.60h.
H> Nothing new in 1.60h. Just some bug-fixes.
I guess they should list the bugfixes too, don't you?
--
Ricardo M. Reyes
(Mar del Plata - Argentina)
[EMAIL PROTE
El martes 30 de abril de 2002, a las 12.58, Marck D Pearlstone decía:
MDP>>> It's annoying, but it's not a bug. It means that the connection
MDP>>> centre is still open and that the message is locked by a current
MDP>>> Send task.
>> I have the connection center configured to show automatically
El martes 30 de abril de 2002, a las 5.18, Charles Collinson decía:
>> 2) Edit the registry in the key:
>>HKCU/software/RIT/The bat/RAS height (set to 0)
>> RAS left (set to 0)
CC> Thanks that sort of solved it. How and why it did this I don't know, as I
CC> d
Hello all,
Tuesday, April 30, 2002, Lynna Lunsford wrote:
MM>> plugin is in beta stage, it can't be on the official page. I
MM>> removed this file from my server, because it is old version.
MM>> There is a new one, but it is probably in Czech only, I don't
MM>> know, test it.
LL> I am wondering
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Gene,
@30 April 2002, 16:49:31 -0400 (21:49 UK time) Gene Gough wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> And when and where was this announced? Thanks.
On the TBBETA list a long time ago. It's where bugs are mostly dealt
with. If you
Since this never was entered into the database I would like to discuss
it a bit here before putting it in myself. Some off-line discussions a
month or more ago indicated that perhaps the operation that I see as a
failure is actually working as designed. If so, I feel the design is
faulty.
I'm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hello Marek,
Tuesday, April 30, 2002, 7:38:14 AM, you digitally penned the
following:
MM> On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Kara Denizi wrote:
>> >> There is one for AVG ( www.grisoft.com that I downloaded at
>> >> http://www.thebat.ipex.cz/stazeni/beta/avgbat2.zip
>>
>>
And when and where was this announced? Thanks.
Tuesday, April 30, 2002, 4:31:48 PM, Marck wrote:
> Whoa there! Not so fast!
> There's a newer, shinier, better way to report bugs these days.
> http://bt.ritlabs.com is the RITlabs BugTraq server address.
> The email address does still wo
ON Tuesday, April 30, 2002, 10:04:50 PM, you wrote:
MDP> Resent-from: blah blah
MDP> to determine the source account. That may help.
MDP> Other than that, you could, instead, use forwarding and construct a
MDP> template that resets the %TO, %FROM and %SUBJECT values as required
MDP> and
I know you can right click on an address in the message header and add
it to the address book, but if it's already in there is there some way
to open it up for editing quickly via some mouse click or key strokes
from the header also?
--
ò¸ó Nick
Danger
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hello Marek,
Tuesday, April 30, 2002, 7:38:14 AM, you digitally penned the
following:
>> >> There is one for AVG ( www.grisoft.com that I downloaded at
>> >> http://www.thebat.ipex.cz/stazeni/beta/avgbat2.zip
>> QS> I guess it's gone. I get "The requested
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Gene,
@30 April 2002, 16:23:38 -0400 (21:23 UK time) Gene Gough wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> When redirecting messages with filter: - local delivery on - Send
>> generated messages: "Queue in Outbox" the delivery skips mes
On the help button, feedback, bugs
Tuesday, April 30, 2002, 3:57:00 PM, Mitja wrote:
> Hello,
> When redirecting messages with filter:
> - local delivery on
> - Send generated messages: "Queue in Outbox"
> the delivery skips messages.
> Does anyone else have this problems. Where can I rep
I e-mailed RIT Labs about a site licence, but I haven't head back, so
I thought I'd throw it out to the mailing list in case there are
resellers here that could help me.
I'm looking at purchasing a site licence for 15 users.
Michael T. Ashby
___
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mitja,
@30 April 2002, 21:49:47 +0200 (20:49 UK time) Mitja Perko wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Thanks! That was just what I needed. Just one more thing: Is it
> possible to keep the To: field. Or add another field that woul
Hello,
When redirecting messages with filter:
- local delivery on
- Send generated messages: "Queue in Outbox"
the delivery skips messages.
Does anyone else have this problems. Where can I report this?
Best regards,
Mitja Perko
Curren
Hello Marck,
Thanks! That was just what I needed. Just one more thing: Is it
possible to keep the To: field. Or add another field that would have
the value of the old To:.
I would like to be able to filter depending on the To: field (color
the message).
Best regards,
Mitja Perko
Tuesday, Apr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Daniel,
@30 April 2002, 14:32:20 -0400 (19:32 UK time) Daniel Grunberg wrote
in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I'm sorry, I thought I was sending the message from my Opera
> folder.
That can mean only one thing: You're relying on f
Hi Dave and Clive
Tue, 30 Apr 2002 15:17:37[GMT +0100] (10:17 AM EDST) Dave Conroy
wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
> Tuesday, April 30, 2002, 2:35:28 PM, Dave wrote:
DG>> Here is my reply to a message sent to me by an Online Team Leader at
DG>> First Union Online. (I sent a copy of the message to Sue,
Tue, 30 Apr 2002 15:50:52[GMT +0100] (10:50 AM EDST) Clive Taylor
wrote:
> 30 April 2002, 14:35, you wrote:
DG>> ere is my reply to a message sent to me by an Online Team Leader at
DG>> First Union Online. (I sent a copy of the message to Sue, before I
DG>> sent it to TBUDL.)
DG>> =
Mon, 29 Apr 2002 16:06:47[GMT ] (12:06 PM EDST) Deborah L
wrote:
> On 29 Apr 2002 16:4:36 +0100 Jerry wrote:
>>5. Is there any plan to integrate offline news viewer with the Bat? I found
>>Bat a s good mailer, I have yet to find a good newsreader program for the
>>Windows
> I would al
El martes 30 de abril de 2002, a las 6.25, Marck D Pearlstone decía:
>> If I hit "send queued mail" it says "nothing to send", but I can see
>> the mail in the Outbox, and surely not parked.
>> Now I'm really sure it's bug, and a really annoying one
MDP> It's annoying, but it's not a bug. It me
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Ricardo,
@30 April 2002, 12:43:15 -0300 (16:43 UK time) Ricardo M. Reyes wrote
in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MDP>> It's annoying, but it's not a bug. It means that the connection
MDP>> centre is still open and that the message is lo
Hi Daniel,
Tuesday, April 30, 2002, 2:35:28 PM, you wrote:
DG> Here is my reply to a message sent to me by an Online Team Leader at
DG> First Union Online. (I sent a copy of the message to Sue, before I
DG> sent it to TBUDL.)
I guess I must be dumb, but I don't see the point of this post on th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi David,
@30 April 2002, 15:26:22 +0100 David Elliott wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> ... Also, to make best use of this, you should enable "Local
>> delivery" under Network and Administration.
> Slightly OT as it for SecureBa
On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Kara Denizi wrote:
> >> There is one for AVG ( www.grisoft.com that I downloaded at
> >> http://www.thebat.ipex.cz/stazeni/beta/avgbat2.zip
>
> QS> I guess it's gone. I get "The requested URL /stazeni/beta/avgbat2.zip
> QS> was not found on this server."
>
> I had essentiall
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
G'day Quin
Tuesday, April 30, 2002, 10:20:04, you wrote (in part):
>> There is one for AVG ( www.grisoft.com that I downloaded at
>> http://www.thebat.ipex.cz/stazeni/beta/avgbat2.zip
QS> I guess it's gone. I get "The requested URL /stazeni/
Hello Roelof!
It finally works. I combined your tips with the help of Gerard
and ...filtering is perfect now. I made a filter for outgoing
mail too, 'll see if it works as well.
Read you,
Fré.
Visit www.skripton.com
Reactions & mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
30 April 2002, 14:35, you wrote:
DG> ere is my reply to a message sent to me by an Online Team Leader at
DG> First Union Online. (I sent a copy of the message to Sue, before I
DG> sent it to TBUDL.)
DG> QUOTE
I share your frustration with some sites not allowing Oper
Hello Gerard!
On Tuesday 30-04-02 (15:37) you wrote:
G> - Put it on top of you incoming mail sort list - Check if it
G> is looking in the "Kludges" - Check presence is YES - Check
G> Active Marked - check Manual only Un-Marked
--
In the meantime I had added a second filter (i.e. f
Hello Marck
On 30 April 2002 at 11:47:48 +0100 (which was 11:47 where I live) Marck D
Pearlstone might have written
> There is only one way. The filters should not "move" but should "redirect"
> (see the available "Actions") the messages to the inboxes of the other
> accounts. Also, to make best
Hello Lynna,
Tuesday, April 30, 2002, 2:36:19 AM, you wrote:
> There is one for AVG ( www.grisoft.com that I downloaded at
> http://www.thebat.ipex.cz/stazeni/beta/avgbat2.zip
I guess it's gone. I get "The requested URL /stazeni/beta/avgbat2.zip
was not found on this server."
Best regards,
-
On 30-4-2002 at 15:53, syv wrote:
Hi,
s>>> What's new in 1.60h? I did not see a mention in the readme
s>>> file.
TM>> Check out the What's New link at http://www.ritlabs.com/the_bat/download.html
> Did, and it shows what's new in 1.60 and 1.60c but I don't
> see 1.60h.
Nothing new in 1.60h. J
On Tuesday, April 30, 2002, Tim Musson wrote:
1.60h
s>> What's new in 1.60h? I did not see a mention in the readme
s>> file.
TM> Check out the What's New link at http://www.ritlabs.com/the_bat/download.html
Did, and it shows what's new in 1.60 and 1.60c but I don't
see 1.60h.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
ON Tuesday, April 30, 2002, 2:33:38 PM, you wrote:
FvL> It still doesn't work ...
Hi Fré,
I have excatly the same filter like Reolof described and it has worked
for me. Some special interest point to re-check:
- Put it on top of you incoming mail sort list
- Check if it is looking in the "
Here is my reply to a message sent to me by an Online Team Leader at
First Union Online. (I sent a copy of the message to Sue, before I
sent it to TBUDL.)
QUOTE
Please see my comments below.
I look forward to your solving the problem.
Thank you for your help.
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Dave,
@30 April 2002, 08:30:18 -0400 (13:30 UK time) Dave Braze wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MDP>> There is only one way. The filters should not "move" but should
MDP>> "redirect" (see the available "Actions") the messages to
On 30-4-2002 at 2:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
>> Create a new folder and name it $known$.
> Where do I create that new folder? Inside any Account?
yes.
> And all emails sent by people in my Pesonal Address book
> will be deposited in that folder -- regardless of the
> Account the email
Hallo Roelof,
Op dinsdag 30-04-02 (12:06) schreef je me:
RO> I'll give you my filter.
RO> There are a few things important for the filter, those are:
RO> Source: Your Inbox
RO> Target: Your tbudl folder
RO> String: Reply-To: tbudl
RO> Location: Kludges
RO> Presence: Yes
RO> Active: Must be
Hello Roelof,
> String: Reply-To: tbudl
> Location: Kludges
> Presence: Yes
I use:
String: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Location: Recipient
Presence: Yes
And it has never failed since I joined the list 4 months ago.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.60c
_
Hey Marck,
My MUA believes you used Ritlabs SecureBat! (v1.60d/iKey1000)
to write the following on Tuesday, April 30, 2002 at 6:47:48 AM.
>> I have 5 accounts and have currently set up filters to move all
>> mails from 4 accounts to inbox of my main account. However after
>> the move to inbox me
On Monday, April 29, 2002, 11:14 PM, you wrote:
well, I think I either answered my own question, or I did the import
right, because it now shows a nice checked box, right ?
thanks,
JN> Paul,
JN> Also be sure you have imported your certificate into TB! Under
JN> Account/Properties/General, cli
Tuesday, April 30, 2002, 6:47:48 AM, Marck wrote:
MDP> @30 April 2002, 12:23:14 +0200 (11:23 UK time) Elpros wrote:
>> I have 5 accounts and have currently set up filters to move all
>> mails from 4 accounts to inbox of my main account. However after the
>> move to inbox messages are not chec
Hello Bat Folk.
It appears that TB! doesn't recognize my modem connections
though I may not be using the right terms as I can
get/send erratically. Intermittently TB! 'cannot find
server' either pop or SMTP. All settings/passwords are
correct.
The following events occurred between th
Hey syv,
My MUA believes you used The Bat! (v1.60h) Educational
to write the following on Monday, April 29, 2002 at 5:36:49 PM.
s> Hi tbudl,
s> What's new in 1.60h? I did not see a mention in the readme
s> file.
Check out the What's New link at http://www.ritlabs.com/the_bat/download.html
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: MD5
On Monday, April 29, 2002, 9:56 PM, you wrote:
ACM> Yes. The S/MIME keys are different from the PGP keys. You have to go
ACM> to a central authority and have them generate key pair/s for you. You
ACM> can follow the tutorial found here http://www.mi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Elpros,
@30 April 2002, 12:23:14 +0200 (11:23 UK time) Elpros wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I have 5 accounts and have currently set up filters to move all
> mails from 4 accounts to inbox of my main account. However after t
Hi!
I have 5 accounts and have currently set up filters to move all mails
from 4 accounts to inbox of my main account. However after the move to
inbox messages are not checked against the filters. How can I convince
them to be filtered? I have already checked "Continue processing with
other filte
Hello Fré,
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002 19:52:39 +0200GMT (29-4-02, 19:52 +0200GMT, where
I live), you wrote:
>>I have just given up 'kludges' as location, I'll see what
>>happens.
FvL> Well: nothing ... Messages keep being put in Inbox. What am i
FvL> overseeing?
I'll give you my filter.
There are a f
Hello Chill,
On Monday, April 29, 2002 at 17:31:03 +0200, you wrote concerning
'subscribe to folder in IMAP4?':
...
> Is it possible to subscribe to folders in IMAP4 with The Bat!? (This
> is a possibility given by this protocol), if it is possible, how?
Yes it's possible. Go to the mail dispatc
On 30-4-2002 at 10:36, Lynna Lunsford wrote:
Hello Lynna,
Haico>> yes. ;) *.bav is the plug-in extension which TB needs to
Haico>> integrate anti-virus software. I believe only
Haico>> Kaspersky(sp.?) has it.
> There is one for AVG ( www.grisoft.com that I downloaded at
> http://www.thebat.ipe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Ricardo,
@30 April 2002, 23:07:58 -0300 (03:07 UK time) Ricardo M. Reyes wrote
in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> If I hit "send queued mail" it says "nothing to send", but I can see
> the mail in the Outbox, and surely not parked.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: MD5
Hello DG,
Sunday, April 28, 2002, 5:48:54 AM, you wrote:
Sr.> Why not use UltimateZip found at http://www.ultimatezip.com/
Sr.> Supports ALL archive formats and is freeware.
Sr.> Hope this helps.
Sr.> - --
Sr.> Regards,
Sr.> DG Raftery Sr.
Thank
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: MD5
Hello Haico,
Tuesday, April 30, 2002, 12:22:58 AM, you wrote:
Haico> yes. ;) *.bav is the plug-in extension which TB needs to
Haico> integrate anti-virus software. I believe only
Haico> Kaspersky(sp.?) has it.
There is one for AVG ( www.grisoft.co
Roelof,
> 2) Edit the registry in the key:
>HKCU/software/RIT/The bat/RAS height (set to 0)
> RAS left (set to 0)
Thanks that sort of solved it. How and why it did this I don't know, as I
don't have a resolution that big. The top and left were set at 3000. May
Hi!
> I use Computer Associate InoculeIT. It can be called from
> the command line. How can I do that?
I don't think you can in TB!
> Options | Virus protection | External plug-in. Only *.bav,
> it does not call an exe file.
> Am I missing something?
yes. ;) *.bav is the plug-in extension whi
Hello Robert,
Tuesday, April 30, 2002, 12:00:29 AM, you wrote:
Beeger> It is a stable system and the only extensions I use the whole time is
Beeger> Norton Internet Security 2002 Professional and Norton Antivirus 2002.
Beeger> This constellation works fine with 1.60c.
Beeger> So I don't think it
Hello, Lynna!
Monday, April 29, 2002, 10:13:36 PM, you wrote:
LL> version works fine on some machines and is buggy on others
LL> there seems to be a conflict with other software or
LL> operating systems that might be the cause of it
That's the fate of software. When it runs, you are happy.
89 matches
Mail list logo
