Re: sending e-mail to a group with only group name appearing in recipient's "to" field

I think that the Mass Mailing feature was designed for this. However, it will show each recipient's address in the To: field rather than the name of the Group. I am using version 6.0.12 with an even more obsolete Help File, so your mileage may vary. :-) -- Bill McQuillan Using The Bat! 6.0.12

Re: OAUTH Grayed Out

; -- > Regards, > Jack > Central Alabama USA > The Bat! E-Mail Client by Ritlabs version 6.0.12 > Windows 10 Home Build 9200 -- Bill McQuillan Using The Bat! 6.0.12 on Windows 6.2 build 9200- Current version is 9.1.18 | 'Using

Re: Account tree font

>>>> know how to do that? TF>>> Go to: Options / Preferences / Message List / Fonts. TF>>> Over here, it says Segoe UI, which is the orginal font set by Ritlabs. TF>>> Maybe this got changed unintentionally with an unknown keyboard shortcut. I think that you should

The Whole BODY of the Message

of the raw message? Thanks for your attention, -- Bill McQuillan <bill.mcquil...@pobox.com> Using The Bat! 5.8.8 on Windows 6.2 build 9200- Current version is 7.1 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Access Violation error message

! that no data seemed to have been lost. -- Bill McQuillan bill.mcquil...@pobox.com Using The Bat! 5.0.20.1 on Windows 7 6.1 build 7601-Service Pack 1 Current version is 6.6 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Voyager: desperately need a hack to associate mailto: URLs to Voyager.

tab and you should be able to set the MailTo: option and then press Associate Now. Hope this helps. -- Bill McQuillan bill.mcquil...@pobox.com Using The Bat! 5.0.20.1 on Windows 7 6.1 build 7601-Service Pack 1 Current version is 6.1.8 | 'Using

Re: 5.4 Quick Filtering

it create a tab Try holding the Alt-shift while left-clicking on the particular field in the message list. (Esc to undo.) -- Bill McQuillan bill.mcquil...@pobox.com Using The Bat! 5.0.20.1 on Windows 7 6.1 build 7601-Service Pack 1 Current version

Re: Memo popup hotkey

.html That's it! I just put it in my personal cheatsheet text file. Thanks for the quick response. -- Bill McQuillan bill.mcquil...@pobox.com Using The Bat! 5.0.20.1 on Windows 7 6.1 build 7601-Service Pack 1 Current version is 5.2.2 | 'Using

Memo popup hotkey

of the hotkey in an earlier version of The Bat! holp. Anybody know what I am talking about? Angry aside The criminal lack of documentation for this awesomely complex mail client will probably be the ultimate reason I'll abandon it. /Angry aside -- Bill McQuillan bill.mcquil...@pobox.com Using The Bat

Re: Fonts et al

On Tue, 2013-04-30, Thomas Fernandez wrote: OK, so what happens if the HTML message describes Comic Sans Serife, and I don't have that on my computer? Does Windows - or TB! - show a default font? Yep. -- Bill McQuillan bill.mcquil...@pobox.com Using The Bat! 5.0.20.1 on Windows 7 6.1 build

Re: Fonts et al

this helps. -- Bill McQuillan bill.mcquil...@pobox.com Using The Bat! 5.0.20.1 on Windows 7 6.1 build 7601-Service Pack 1 Current version is 5.2.2 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Headers in preview pane

and click on Received and chose Edit. -- Bill McQuillan bill.mcquil...@pobox.com Using The Bat! 5.0.20.1 on Windows 7 6.1 build 7601-Service Pack 1 Current version is 5.2.2 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: How to get rid of the X-Priority field

for shortcomings in the email software I was using, so perhaps I am a bit sensitive. I am sorry that my challenge has sent this group off on a bit of a tangent! Thanks to all for the interest and answers. -- Bill McQuillan bill.mcquil...@pobox.com Using The Bat! 5.0.20.1 on Windows 7 6.1 build 7601

Re: How to get rid of the X-Priority field

On Tue, 2012-03-13, Arjan de Groot wrote: On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 12:54:04 -0700, Bill McQuillan wrote: I have noticed that TB puts: X-Priority: 3 (Normal) SNIP Has anybody found a trick to get rid of this ugly field? If you really hate this header you could try loading thebat.exe in a HEX

How to get rid of the X-Priority field

,)%- This has no effect! It still shows up. I have a similar line to get rid of the Reply-To that TB puts in unnecessarily and that *does* work. Has anybody found a trick to get rid of this ugly field? Thanks, again, in advance. -- Bill McQuillan bill.mcquil...@pobox.com Using The Bat! 5.0.20.1

Automatic selection of viewer per folder

composing a new message. Thanks in Advance, -- Bill McQuillan bill.mcquil...@pobox.com Using The Bat! 5.0.20.1 on Windows 7 6.1 build 7601-Service Pack 1 Current version is 4.2.42 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat

Re: Managing the Column Settings in the folder contents list

. ;-) It works! Thanks! -- Bill McQuillan bill.mcquil...@pobox.com Using The Bat! 5.0.20.1 on Windows 7 6.1 build 7601-Service Pack 1 Current version is 4.2.42 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Managing the Column Settings in the folder contents list

the problem? -- Bill McQuillan bill.mcquil...@pobox.com Using The Bat! 5.0.20.1 on Windows 7 6.1 build 7601-Service Pack 1 Current version is 4.2.42 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: The Bat! v5 Upgrade Experience

was presented with a choice: Professional or Home Edition? I have no idea! Checking (Help | About) says I have version 5.0.20.1 with a single-computer licence. Does this mean I have the Home Edition? -- Bill McQuillan bill.mcquil...@pobox.com Using The Bat! 5.0.20.1 on Windows 7 6.1 build

Re: Learning to use Mail Ticker

the number of new messages, since if there are many, I have to wait an unknown amount of time to see that info. Oh well, maybe a wishlist item. Thanks for all of your assistance, Batteers! -- Bill McQuillan bill.mcquil...@pobox.com Using The Bat! 5.0.12 on Windows 7 6.1 build 7601-Service Pack 1

Learning to use Mail Ticker

square; and a letter under the Size, usually an A but at least once a P. Unfortunately, the documentation is (typically) poor! Can anyone point me to better documention? grin Or at least tell me what these last two might mean? -- Bill McQuillan bill.mcquil...@pobox.com Using The Bat! 5.0.12

Re: Problems on Windows 7

icons area (arrow to the left of the system tray). Click on that arrow, choose Customize and find The Bat! entry. It is probably set to Show only notifications. Change it to show icon and notifications to make it appear in the system tray (now called Notification Area). -- Bill McQuillan bill.mcquil

Re: Pictures in html?

NO DOCUMENTATION about it. So, does anybody on this list have a pointer to any documention about the Image Download Manager? -- Bill McQuillan bill.mcquil...@pobox.com Using The Bat! 5.0.12 on Windows 7 6.1 build 7601-Service Pack 1 Current

Re: is v.4.2.42 truncated urls in the body?

the partial differential character it changed into a ?. I don't know where the corruption is occurring, but I hope this information helps. -- Bill McQuillan bill.mcquil...@pobox.com Using The Bat! 2.11 on Windows XP 5.1 build 2600-Service Pack 2 Current

Re: How to copy a template

(which produces 'Cannot find a quick template ') followed by: My Template (as just text) -- Bill McQuillan bill.mcquil...@pobox.com Using The Bat! 2.11 on Windows XP 5.1 build 2600-Service Pack 2 Current version is 4.2.42 | 'Using TBUDL

Re: OTFE - some questions

working with/editing it? Well, since I believe that OTFE stands for On The Fly Encription I imagine that whole files are not decrypted, but instead TB has a sort of builtin driver to access the mail database while only decrypting and encrypting a buffer at a time. -- Bill McQuillan bill.mcquil

Re: v4.0.38 question - HTML display problem

used by TB to invoke your browser. -- Bill McQuillan bill.mcquil...@pobox.com Using The Bat! 2.11 on Windows XP 5.1 build 2600-Service Pack 2 Current version is 4.2.10.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat

Re: Make The Bat! default email application

TB v2.11 so you'll have to adapt these instructions to your version. If that does not fix it, I can run through my next step: updating the mailto: URL info using the Windows Explorer Tools menu. -- Bill McQuillan bill.mcquil...@pobox.com Using The Bat! 2.11 on Windows XP 5.1 build 2600-Service

Re: If a URL ends with a bracket, TB! will not make that bracket part of the link

in the Windows editor but NOT in the MicroEd editor. It will be interesting to send and receive this message and see what the various viewers do! -- Bill McQuillan bill.mcquil...@pobox.com Using The Bat! 2.11 on Windows XP 5.1 build 2600-Service Pack 2

Re: If a URL ends with a bracket, TB! will not make that bracket part of the link

, except the last bracket of course! Obviously, your mileage may vary if your TB is later than 2.11. -- Bill McQuillan bill.mcquil...@pobox.com Using The Bat! 2.11 on Windows XP 5.1 build 2600-Service Pack 2 Current version is 4.2.10.0 | 'Using TBUDL

Re: If a URL ends with a bracket, TB! will not make that bracket part of the link

.. Well, I checked the RFCs for URLs and Right Parenthesis is a valid character in this position, so I have reported it in the Bug Tracker: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=7709 -- Bill McQuillan bill.mcquil...@pobox.com Using The Bat! 2.11 on Windows XP 5.1 build 2600-Service Pack 2

Re: Why won't the developers add an option for allowing a single carriage return for MicroEd? (with auto-format enabled)

. In fact I did just that with this message! -- Bill McQuillan bill.mcquil...@pobox.com Using The Bat! 2.11 on Windows XP 5.1 build 2600-Service Pack 2 Current version is 4.2.10.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat

Re: Why won't the developers add an option for allowing a single carriage return for MicroEd? (with auto-format enabled)

On Fri, 2009-08-28, MFPA wrote: Hi On Friday 28 August 2009 at 7:25:01 AM, in mid:469231774.20090827232...@pobox.com, Bill McQuillan wrote: Regardless, there are many other reasons I prefer the Windows editor. And for the issue of not wrapping the final output when I send, when I am

Re: Why won't the developers add an option for allowing a single carriage return for MicroEd? (with auto-format enabled)

appear just after the last character on that line. Also note that I am using a fairly ancient version the Windows editor (2.11) so that may be a factor too. Oh well, no accounting for taste. Best of luck, -- Bill McQuillan bill.mcquil...@pobox.com Using The Bat! 2.11 on Windows XP 5.1 build 2600

Re: Why won't the developers add an option for allowing a single carriage return for MicroEd? (with auto-format enabled)

at some point in the past and decide that just doing a Windows style editor was the way to solve the problem for people that wanted what you're asking for. (I could be wrong!) BTW, my Windows editor seems to color quoted text appropriately. -- Bill McQuillan bill.mcquil...@pobox.com Using The Bat

Re: Please help me understand the Pros and Cons of MicroEd (many, many wrapping issues)

such feature has been incorporated into a more recent version. If so, I might (might!) be tempted to upgrade. -- Bill McQuillan bill.mcquil...@pobox.com Using The Bat! 2.11 on Windows XP 5.1 build 2600-Service Pack 2 Current version is 4.2.9.1

Re: Sorry: a test

, but I left the option turned off since it is much easier for me to delete a duplicate message than to read a missing one! -- Bill McQuillan bill.mcquil...@pobox.com Using The Bat! 2.11 on Windows XP 5.1 build 2600-Service Pack 2 Current version

Re: Problem with %HDR macro

by creating the same User-Agent header twice. -- Bill McQuillan bill.mcquil...@pobox.com Using The Bat! 2.11 on Windows XP 5.1 build 2600-Service Pack 2 Current version is 4.2.4 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat

Re: Recipients' Addresses Suppression

:; in the TO: field. (Note the trailing :; which satisfies the requirement for something in the TO: field by using the under-utilized group syntax.) -- Bill McQuillan bill.mcquil...@pobox.com Using The Bat! 2.11 on Windows XP 5.1 build 2600-Service Pack 2

Re: Always sending us-ascii

On Mon, 2009-03-02, MFPA wrote: On Monday 2 March 2009 at 2:38:16 PM, in mid:392566194.20090302143...@my_localhost, MFPA wrote: On Sunday 1 March 2009 at 6:35:44 PM, in mid:448171083.20090301103...@pobox.com, Bill McQuillan wrote: [...] This leads me to believe that the list server

Re: Always sending us-ascii

server to determine whether a cut mark already exists and insert one just before the footer if necessary. This could reduce the fish traffic on this list considerably! end peeve :-) -- Bill McQuillan bill.mcquil...@pobox.com Using The Bat! 2.11 on Windows XP 5.1 build 2600-Service Pack 2

Re: [RECOVERED] Re: Confirm Receipt, Reading Confirmation

, it is possible that your ISP is doing you the favor of deleting these as some sort of spam. Note that this is not necessarily the actual explanation, but it is something to consider if no other explanation turns out to be better. Good luck, -- Bill McQuillan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 2.11

Re: Speaking of signatures

it into the message being created. For instance, the text already living days and xxx hours probably needed to be updated just before the macro put it into the message. That's the use of an external program. -- Bill McQuillan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 2.11 on Windows XP 5.1 build 2600

Re: The Bat and MSGTAG

* be considered a loss. -- Bill McQuillan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 2.11 on Windows XP 5.1 build 2600-Service Pack 2 Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Some folders are slow to respond - an update

manager has a similar problem? -- Bill McQuillan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 2.11 on Windows XP 5.1 build 2600-Service Pack 2 Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Which mailman server is correct?

know which is the correct one? -- Bill McQuillan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 2.11 on Windows XP 5.1 build 2600-Service Pack 2 Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Mail tracking

started using TB was the fact that I could download and read ANY email without worrying about Trojans, viruses or web tracking bugs. -- Bill McQuillan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 2.11 on Windows XP 5.1 build 2600-Service Pack 2 Current version

Re: .EML associations don't remain sticky

realize that it might be accepting defeat, but consider how often you double click on a .EML file in Windows Explorer. If you never actually do (I never do), you might just go to [Options | Preferences... | Applications] in TB and uncheck .EML. Let LookOut Express have it! -- Bill McQuillan

Re: .EML associations don't remain sticky

. Good luck. -- Bill McQuillan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 2.11 on Windows XP 5.1 build 2600-Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.99 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Common filters

and outgoing filters might need opposite orders! Just a thought. -- Bill McQuillan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 2.11 on Windows XP 5.1 build 2600-Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.99 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat

Re: Flagged messages not shown?

columns. Flagging is the one that allows orange flags to show. -- Bill McQuillan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 2.11 on Windows XP 5.1 build 2600-Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.99 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat

Re: TB and Gmail?

On Sun, 2007-06-10, Susanne wrote: My current setting for smtp are: smpt.gmail.com secure to dedicated port TLS 465 Is the name of the smtp server supposed to have smpt spelled incorrectly? -- Bill McQuillan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 2.11 on Windows XP 5.1 build 2600-Service Pack

Re: TB and Gmail?

at it several times without seeing it. Fortunately, I looked once more and did see it! :-) -- Bill McQuillan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 2.11 on Windows XP 5.1 build 2600-Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.99 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http

Re: Lists that don't overwrite the Reply-To header

report from a 2.11 user.) ;-) -- Bill McQuillan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 2.11 on Windows XP 5.1 build 2600-Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: How to attach a picture

to myself should have it and I will report my success or failure. -- Bill McQuillan Using The Bat! 2.11 on Windows XP 5.1 build 2600-Service Pack 2 -- Notice the square brackets in the middle. That's what I got when I copied and pasted

Re: How to attach a picture

for these formatting functions! I hope that TBUDL lets at least the Plain Text portion of this message through! -- Bill McQuillan Using The Bat! 2.11 on Windows XP 5.1 build 2600-Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL

Re: How to attach a picture

message text editor. Good luck, -- Bill McQuillan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 2.11 on Windows XP 5.1 build 2600-Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Filters

* a message. The Action tab then allows the selected message to be moved only to a single folder AFAICT. I need a different filter for each destination folder to keep my mailing list messages separate. -- Bill McQuillan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 2.11 on Windows XP 5.1 build 2600-Service Pack 1

Re: Gmane / subject on replies with counter / threading

is to uncheck Use reply numbering in the subject line in all reply templates. -- Bill McQuillan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 2.11 on Windows XP 5.1 build 2600-Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http

Re: Macro for AV automatic mail ?

get per day have something like: From: Rolex Watches [EMAIL PROTECTED] so one would need to match the phrase in front of the email address exactly to the correct person in order to to use this sort of test. -- Bill McQuillan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 2.11 on Windows XP 5.1 build 2600

Re: Date of a sent message ?

message header and look for the date field of the earliest (bottom-most) Received header field. This will be the time stamp that was added when The Bat! sent the message on its first hop. -- Bill McQuillan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 2.11 on Windows XP 5.1 build 2600-Service Pack 1

Re: TB 3.01 Installer

On Sat, 2004-10-16, Jonathan Angliss wrote: On Saturday, October 16, 2004, Bill McQuillan wrote... After getting the e-mail from Ritlabs announcing the availability of 3.01, I went to the download page and discovered that even though the page shows the size of each version of The Bat!, what

TB 3.01 Installer

the actual program that installs itself for TB 3.01 so that I can archive it? -- Bill McQuillan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 2.11 on Windows XP 5.1 build 2600-Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http

Determiing Reply Type in Macros

TB has two buttons: Reply to the message selected and Reply to all. Is there any way in a reply template to determine which one was pushed? -- Bill McQuillan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 2.11 on Windows XP 5.1 build 2600-Service Pack 1

Re: Rogues pics

the bizarre renaming of the perfectly good RFC Name Sender to X-Sender. -- Bill McQuillan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 2.11 on Windows XP 5.1 build 2600-Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com

Re: A new one

off my machine with Norton Anti-virus, Ad-Aware and regedt32. DO NOT GO TO THE SHAKESPEARE RANDOM CURSING GENERATOR! YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED. -- Bill McQuillan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 2.11 on Windows XP 5.1 build 2600-Service Pack 1

Re: template problem

On Mon, 2004-08-23 at 08:23:42, Thomas Fernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, that's where you can include the %reply macro. Reading the help file shows me that the macro is actually %replyto. How accurate this may be is another question. ;-) -- Bill McQuillan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using

Re: Harvest Sender Email Addresses??

On Mon, 2004-08-09 at 15:41:19, Mike email (The Bat!) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Saturday, August 7, 2004, 9:27:58 AM, Bill McQuillan wrote: BM I had to insert the Sender: header field manually (as X-Sender!) and BM I had to save the message into the Outbox to get the Bat! to let me BM put my

Re: Harvest Sender Email Addresses??

the Bat! to let me put my address into the Sender: field. -- Bill McQuillan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 2.11 on Windows XP 5.1 build 2600-Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat

Re: Harvest Sender Email Addresses??

On Sat, 2004-08-07 at 01:27:58, Bill McQuillan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2004-08-06 at 12:32:38, Zonnet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have never seen a msg with multiple address in the From: field. Maybe you could send one to demonstrate? I had to insert the Sender: header field

Re: Harvest Sender Email Addresses??

. In fact, one of the uses of the Sender: header field is to show the actual, single sender of the message when there are multiple From: addresses. (It mystifies me why The Bat! chose to rename this standard field to X-Sender:.) -- Bill McQuillan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 2.11 on Windows

Re: Harvest Sender Email Addresses??

and would be an interesting exercise! snideI have noticed that the Bat! implementers seem to have left out some of the more obscure but useful portions of the mail RFCs in their haste to give us smilies, Chat, etc./snide -- Bill McQuillan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 2.11 on Windows XP 5.1

Re: Smileys - How Are They Viewed By Non Bat Mail Programs

. - There is no need to close The Bat! while you perform these steps. I think that the version of the Bat! must be at least 2.12, since these directions do not work for the 2.11 version that I have installed. In particular, ctl-alt-shft-T brings up some sort of Chat dialog! -- Bill McQuillan

%THEBATVERSION Extension

As can be seen in my sig below, the %THEBATVERSION macro I used in the template only shows 2.11 whereas I quite frequently see sigs showing 2.11.02. Does this mean that they are using Beta versions or do they know a variant macro that inserts the minor version? -- Bill McQuillan [EMAIL