Re: Tabs

2010-03-17 Thread Mr Happy
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:40:42 +, MFPA
expires2...@ymail.com wrote:

Not sure if this would achieve what you want, but (instead of using
tabs) did you try creating a Sorted by From View Mode, then set it
as the Global View Mode when you require the behaviour you describe? I
think this would only work if you are visiting folders for which you
don't have folder-specific view modes defined.

Hi,

Yes, I have created a few different view modes. Most of my folders -
except for the Sent Mail folder and a few other odds and ends - have
been given a default view mode that I had setup (basically removed
some of the columns the Bat shows by default and sorts by received
time). I know I could just go in and assign the 'sorted by from' view
mode to the folders I go into, but I use the tabs as a temporary way
to change the folder view. I see the view modes as a permanent thing.

So for example, my inbox and saved folders are normally sorted by
received time with the view mode. Now, say I wanted to look for a
particular person (sender) in the inbox and then do the same for saved
- but only as a temporary measure, after I had found the message I was
looking for, I would want to return the view to the default I had set.
What I would do is to click on the 'sorted by from' tab in the inbox,
which would temporarily sort the messages by from. I would then find
the message. However, when I then click on the saved folder, despite
the 'sorted by from' tab being the active one, the default view mode
is what is used (sorted by received time), meaning I have to click on
the All tab and then click again on the 'sorted by from' tab.

But yeah - if I wanted the messages to be permanently changed, I'd use
a view mode. From what I understand though, the tabs are to be used
for temporary changes, and that is all I ever want when I use one.
-- 

Regards,

Mr Happy



Current version is 4.2.23 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Tabs

2010-03-15 Thread Mr Happy
Hi everyone,

I think the answer is no (I have looked in the options and couldn't
find anything related), but is there a way to make the tabs setting
stick when you change folders?

For example, I've gone into Options-Preferences-Tabs and created a new
tab called Sorted by From (fairly obvious what it does). Anyway,
that puts a new tab down in the Bat window called Sorted by From,
which - when I click on it - sorts the messages in the folder I am in
by the From field. That's great. Here is the problem however - when I
change to another folder (so for example, set the Sorted by From on
my inbox folder and then click on the Sent Mail folder), the messages
go back to being sorted by the view mode of the folder that you click
on. So, despite the Sorted by From tab still being active, the
settings of this tab are not applied when I click on a new folder.
What I have to do - and I change folders often enough that it is
pretty annoying - is to click on the new folder, then click on the
default All tab to reset the Sorted by From and then click again
on the Sorted by From tab.

What I really want is if I make the Sorted by From tab active on a
folder, and then click on another folder, that folder will take the
Sorted by From tab settings and apply them. Currently the tab is
active, but the settings are ignored.
-- 

Regards,

Mr Happy



Current version is 4.2.23 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Address Book Sorting

2010-03-02 Thread Mr Happy
Hi,

When you create a new group in the Address Book, it doesn't seem as
you can sort them (into alphabetical order for example). Any new
groups I create are simply added to the end of the existing set of
groups, and I want them alphabetised. I've tried the same shortcut
keys as you use to move folders in the folder list (Ctrl+Shift+Up and
Ctrl+Shift+Down), but these don't work. Is sorting a feature that is
simply missing, or am I using the wrong key combination (I can't find
a menu option for it in the Address Book itself).
-- 

Regards,

Mr Happy



Current version is 4.2.23 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Inline Filtering

2009-06-25 Thread Mr Happy
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 09:33:18 +1000, Robin Anson
robin.an...@optusnet.com.au wrote:

On Wed, 24 Jun 2009 at 23:30:26 +1000, Mr Happy wrote:
 Right, I think I've worked out how to reproduce it. If I highlight the
 message that will be shown when I use the filter, when I use the
 filter, the 'no message loaded' does not appear (ie it works fine).
 However, if I highlight the message above the message that will be
 shown when filtered, and then use the filter, when the filtered
 message is shown, the 'no message loaded' does appear (ie it doesn't
 work).

 I'm not sure why you guys can't replicate it - I've had this bug on
 every single PC I've ever used The Bat on (it's always driven me nuts,
 it's just that I've never complained about it before).

I'm slightly confused - are you talking about using the Quick Search
toolbar? That seems to be the context of your original problem. If that is
the case then I am unable to reproduce the example you have described above.

However,  MFPA  expires2...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Works OK here using v4.0.38 on Windows XP. I just searched for
messages where header contains 753412370.20090621220...@otten.tv,
which is the message-id of Roelof's post I'm replying to. Obviously it
only found one. When I select that one by clicking on it, the no
message loaded in the preview pane is replaced by the message text.
and that can't be done using the Quick Search toolbar - I think it only
looks in the TO, FROM and SUBJECT fields and it doesn't look in the message-id
header field.

Ah, I think you may be onto something Robin. I think Roelof and MFPA
may have tested the wrong thing. The filter/search thing I'm referring
to is the one on the main Bat toolbar, it has a field 'search', a
'next' button to the right, and a 'previous' button to the left. So
yes, it is probably called the Quick Search (if The Bat helpfile
mentions what it is called, I can't find it - The Bat really, really
badly needs some proper documentation). I don't think it accepts
message-id, but I didn't pick up on that until you mentioned it.

Anyway, click in that search field on the toolbar, type in something
that will only produce one message as the result, and then click on it
and see what it shows in the preview pane below the message list. If
you had highlighted another message apart from the one listed in the
results of the search before you did the search, 'no message loaded'
will appear and you won't be able to read the message. If you
highlighted that message that appears in the results before you did
the search though, it looks as though it works ok.
-- 

Regards,

Mr Happy



Current version is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Inline Filtering

2009-06-24 Thread Mr Happy
On Sun, 21 Jun 2009 23:18:11 +0100, MFPA
expires2...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:

Works OK here using v4.0.38 on Windows XP. I just searched for
messages where header contains 753412370.20090621220...@otten.tv,
which is the message-id of Roelof's post I'm replying to. Obviously it
only found one. When I select that one by clicking on it, the no
message loaded in the preview pane is replaced by the message text.

Hm,

Right, I think I've worked out how to reproduce it. If I highlight the
message that will be shown when I use the filter, when I use the
filter, the 'no message loaded' does not appear (ie it works fine).
However, if I highlight the message above the message that will be
shown when filtered, and then use the filter, when the filtered
message is shown, the 'no message loaded' does appear (ie it doesn't
work).

I'm not sure why you guys can't replicate it - I've had this bug on
every single PC I've ever used The Bat on (it's always driven me nuts,
it's just that I've never complained about it before).
-- 

Regards,

Mr Happy



Current version is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Inline Filtering

2009-06-21 Thread Mr Happy
Hi everyone,

I think there may be a bug in the inline filtering. Open my inbox,
click in the filtering field, type in some text (say a persons name),
it only finds one match. I then click on that message, but all it says
in the preview pane is 'no message loaded'. If your filtering finds
two or more messages, you can click on one of the other messages, then
click back on the first message, and it will display, but you cannot
do this when you have only one match - you have to double click on it
to open it (so the bug is the message text not displaying in the
preview pane when you filter and the message is the first message in
the list of matching messages).
-- 

Regards,

Mr Happy



Current version is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: New Message Window

2009-05-08 Thread Mr Happy
On Thu, 7 May 2009 17:30:09 +0200, Jos Klaassens
jfa...@tiscali.nl wrote:

I only use MicroEd, with no problems for these actions. For the first time
g I tried the other editors and experienced exactly the behavior you
described..
   

Heh - last night was the first time I had tried MicroEd (just to try
and work out why things were working for you), and up until then, I
didn't realise that MicroEd behaved differently! g
-- 

Regards,

Mr Happy

Using The Bat! v4.1.11 on Windows XP



Current version is 4.1.11 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: New Message Window

2009-05-07 Thread Mr Happy
On Fri, 1 May 2009 19:06:14 +0200, Jos Klaassens
jfa...@tiscali.nl wrote:

*Everything* you described is working just fine here.. 

If The Bat is already open on my PC when I click a mailto link, yes,
the new message window does open on top of The Bat window. If The Bat
is not running however - which it usually isn't on my PC, I only open
it when needed and close it when done - the result is different (i.e.
the window is likely to open underneath the main Bat window). I
suspect that in some cases, having OTFE enabled - due to the password
dialog - can also affect things.

Shift+Tab most definitely does not move back to the subject field from
the text field though. Using MicroEd, Shift+Tab will move back to the
To field (that is odd in itself, the next field back from text is the
subject field, and that is where it should go), using plain text -
which I do, I don't like MicroEd or HTML - the cursor stays in the
text field, as it does when you use HTML/Plain Text or full HTML.

I think both issues are bugs.
-- 

Regards,

Mr Happy



Current version is 4.1.11 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: New Message Window

2009-05-01 Thread Mr Happy
On Fri, 1 May 2009 00:26:21 +0200, MAU
m...@rancho-k.com wrote:

Open Editor and in View menu check if 'Store window position' is 
selected.

Hi MAU,

That option isn't checked for me. I don't suppose it fixes the 'new
message window below main Bat window' thing, does it (it only fixes
Lynn's issue)?
-- 

Regards,

Mr Happy

Using The Bat! v4.1.11 on Windows XP



Current version is 4.1.11 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


New Message Window

2009-04-30 Thread Mr Happy
Hi everyone,

Why is it that when you click a email link in your browser - and The
Bat opens up with a new message - that the new message window is not
pushed to the front (the main Bat window is on top and you have to
click the new message button on the taskbar to bring it to the front)?
On a related subject, why does the tab (shift+tab) combo not move back
to the subject field when you are in the text area of the new message
window? Tab after all moves from the address field to the subject
field and then to the text field, but shift+tab does not go back to
the subject and address fields.
-- 

Regards,

Mr Happy

Using The Bat! v4.1.11 on Windows XP



Current version is 4.1.11 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Removing OTFE

2009-01-16 Thread Mr Happy
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 12:15:03 +0200, Eddie Castelli
the...@eddiecastelli.com wrote:

What is the reason for removing this security aspect?

Hi everyone,

I did uninstall The Bat from an admin account, but it didn't remove
the registry key, so when I reinstalled, it was still using OTFE.
Anyway, another uninstall and manual deletion of the key, then
reinstall and then import the tbk file and I'm now OTFE-less :)

Why did I want it removed? No longer have any emails worth securing.
If someone wants to break into my house, boot my PC and read my emails
to friends showing them my current PC wallpaper, or an animated gif of
a giant 10 foot high pigeon attacking a guy feeding a flock of pigeons
in a square, than they are most welcome!

(Basically, having to enter a password to start The Bat every time I
wanted to send a quick 5 word email was a pain in the rear end I
suppose)
-- 

Regards,

Mr Happy

Using The Bat! v4.0.34.0 on Windows XP



Current version is 4.1.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Removing OTFE

2009-01-14 Thread Mr Happy
Hi everyone,

Hopefully an easy question - I'm currently using OTFE (Bat Pro 4.1.9),
and I want to revert to non-OTFE. Is it possible?
-- 

Regards,

Mr Happy



Current version is 4.1.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Any Way to Change Menu Bar Text?

2008-09-24 Thread Mr Happy
Hi,

Is there any way of changing the text in the menu bar of a message
when you double click to open it in a separate window? I find the
format of View Folder {ISP Name} of {email account name} that The
Bat current uses is not very helpful. I would prefer the menu bar to
reflect the subject line of the email, like Outlook does.
-- 

Regards,

Mr Happy

Using The Bat! v4.0.34.0 on Windows XP



Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Bug in Automatic Backup

2008-08-25 Thread Mr Happy
On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 08:03:06 +0200, Peter Meyns
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

It's in the registry. In HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\RIT\The Bat! there
is a key Last backup path. It should be safe to change the value and
restart The Bat!.

Hi,

Hm, when I check that key, it does indeed say my application data
folder for my Windows user account, on the C drive. The error message
in The Bat most definitely mentions the E drive though. Even a full
search of the registry looking for 'e:\' brings up nothing for The Bat
:(
-- 

Regards,

Mr Happy

Using The Bat! v4.0.24.0 on Windows XP



Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Bug in Automatic Backup

2008-08-22 Thread Mr Happy
Hi,

With a previous The Bat installation, I had the automatic backup set
to run at 1300 hours and to backup to the E drive. That was quite a
long time ago. Since that time, I have reinstalled Windows and The Bat
a few times, but have always kept the same message base (and I think
this is the cause of the problem). Now, The Bat continues to want to
backup at 1300, and pops up an error message when it can't find the E
drive (drive no longer exists). I have gone into The Bat preferences,
and the System options are set as thus:
Auto Backup: Enabled
Backup every 4 days
Start at 8:00pm
Clicking on Advanced, the backup folder is The Bat folder in
Application Data on my C drive, so no problem there.

What I need to know - where is The Bat getting this old E drive path
from? It's not from the preferences, that is obvious. It can only be
from the message base that I've had throughout my Bat installations
surely? And is there a fix for my problem?
-- 

Regards,

Mr Happy

Using The Bat! v4.0.24.0 on Windows XP



Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Address History

2008-08-10 Thread Mr Happy
On Sun, 10 Aug 2008 23:25:22 +0200, Marek Mikus
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


it allows You to monitor communication with users, like when user wrote it
last time or when You write him. You can have all messages from specific
user in one Address History entry across more account/folders. You can
attach virtual folder etc.

Thanks Marek :)
-- 

Regards,

Mr Happy

Using The Bat! v4.0.24.0 on Windows XP



Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Address History

2008-08-10 Thread Mr Happy
On Sun, 10 Aug 2008 22:52:43 -0400, Leonard Berkowitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Accounts pane Do you mean on of the menus across the top: Message |
Specials | Folder | Account | Tools etc.?

I do not see Addresses in the Account menu. What am I missing?

(I normally use The Bat! v4.0.24 on Windows Vista 6.0 Build 6000, but to
post to the TBUDL, I have to use this Gmail account and its e-mail
client. sigh)

Thanks

He means the address pane down the left hand side of the screen (at
least on mine anyway). The Bat is essentially divided into two panes -
left pane lists the accounts you have, right pane shows the messages.
Look right down at the bottom left of your screen, you should see
three tabs at least - 'All', 'Unread', 'Addresses'. Click on the
Addresses tab.
-- 

Regards,

Mr Happy

Using The Bat! v4.0.24.0 on Windows XP



Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Address History

2008-08-03 Thread Mr Happy
Hi everyone,

Could someone explain the address history feature? The Bat help file
is pretty uninformative on the subject ('missing context help topic
14119' actually when you click the help button in that tab).
-- 

Regards,

Mr Happy

Using The Bat! v4.0.24.0 on Windows XP



Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Groups

2008-07-29 Thread Mr Happy
On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:09:44 +0100, MFPA
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


I bet if you go to the address picker again you are at your group.
And I would guess you have a column of buttons down the middle. Here,
the second one (which is marked ) adds the whole group.

Or you can open the address book from the main TB! window, select the
group and open a new message to it from the button at the top or from
the context menu.

Or you can open a new message and type the group name into the to,
cc, or bcc  field.


 (One other question about groups - I created two groups, one that had
 the 'hide items' unticked, the other that had it ticked. I then moved
 old email addresses that I no longer use - but still want to keep just
 in case - into the group with the option ticked. That removed them
 from the root of the Address Book - which is what I wanted - when I go
 Tools-Address Book, but when I create a new message and click on the
 Address Book button beside the to field, all those people are still
 listed in the root of the Address Book, the exact opposite of when you
 go Tools-Address Book. Is this the way it is meant to work and if so,
 how is it best to remove them from plain sight, but still have them in
 the Address Book if I need them in future?)

Do the choices at options | preferences | address history help at
all?

Thanks, I will go with the 'typing it in route' (I want to forward a
message and can't do that by right clicking on the group in the
address book itself). I was actually hoping the Bat's address book
would be like Outlook's - a group is listed in the root of the book
and all you have to do is click on the group name once and then click
the add button (or double click the group name) and the group is added
to the message. Oh well, maybe in a future version of the Bat, but I
won't hold my breath.

The address history - I don't know what it does. I go to those
preferences, click the help button (the options themselves aren't very
descriptive about what they actually do) and all I get is 'missing
context help topic 14119' (typical of the poor documentation/help file
for the Bat unfortunately). If anyone could explain what the address
history is, that would be nice. It sounds promising, but without
knowing exactly what it does, I can't tell if it will solve my problem
or not.
-- 

Regards,

Mr Happy



Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Groups

2008-07-28 Thread Mr Happy
On Sun, 27 Jul 2008 22:01:43 +0100, MFPA
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


My mileage if I forget to put something in To: varies according to
which server I am sending from - either it will be sent or I'll get an
error message instead.

If it is sent, most addressees receive it ok but the odd one does not,
which might be the fault of anti-spam filtering at their end (or by
their ISP) rather than a server dropping the message. I may or may not
get a bounce notification.

IIRC, leaving To: blank is contrary to an RFC (although I can't
remember if there MUST or only SHOULD be a valid address in that field).

Also, an empty To: field usually becomes something awful, like
undisclosed-recipients.

Oh man, this is going to sound like a stupid question (and it probably
is): now that I have created my new group, how do I send a message to
it? When I create the new message, I click on the Address Book button
beside bcc. My Address Book opens up. I'm ok so far. However, there
are no groups listed here, it is just the root of the Address Book
with everyone listed. So, I click on the dropdown field and find the
group. Still doing ok. Now, I cannot see any way to add the whole
group in one go, I still have to go through and double click on each
member of the group, which basically negates the whole point of
creating a group :(

(One other question about groups - I created two groups, one that had
the 'hide items' unticked, the other that had it ticked. I then moved
old email addresses that I no longer use - but still want to keep just
in case - into the group with the option ticked. That removed them
from the root of the Address Book - which is what I wanted - when I go
Tools-Address Book, but when I create a new message and click on the
Address Book button beside the to field, all those people are still
listed in the root of the Address Book, the exact opposite of when you
go Tools-Address Book. Is this the way it is meant to work and if so,
how is it best to remove them from plain sight, but still have them in
the Address Book if I need them in future?)
-- 

Regards,

Mr Happy



Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Groups

2008-07-26 Thread Mr Happy
On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 12:10:44 +0200, Roelof Otten
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

The name is the real name. The distinctive name or handle is the code
that you see in the properties of the individual address book entry
when you check for the groups it belongs to.
(One entry can belong to multiple unrelated groups.)

Hi Roelof,

Thank you. If I understand from what you've said, the name is what you
see when you click on Tools-Address Book (i.e. it is the entry listed
under Personal Address Book in the left hand pane). The handle is the
entry listed when you actually open an address book entry (so a person
you have in there) and check the Groups field?
-- 

Regards,

Mr Happy



Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Groups

2008-07-26 Thread Mr Happy
On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 00:07:41 +0100, MFPA
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Unless every single member of the group has given you permission to
share their email address with all the other members you probably
should not list all their email addresses in the to field. Better to
put them all in the bcc field instead. You should put something in
the to field - maybe the group name and your own email address (or a
disposable email address set up for the purpose).

Hi,

This is something I wanted to do (not show all the email addresses I
mean). So to do this in The Bat, I should add the members to the
group, and then when I create a new message, instead of putting that
group into the 'to' field, I should put it into the 'bcc' field, and
then just put a disposable email address in the 'to' field?
-- 

Regards,

Mr Happy



Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Groups

2008-07-25 Thread Mr Happy
On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 06:47:18 +1000, Robin Anson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Go to the group, right click and select properties, untick the item labelled
Hide items if not explicitly selected. The contents of the group will
appear back in the root of the address book.

Hi,

Excellent, thank you. That did the trick. My next question was going
to be what is the 'hide items if not explicitly displayed' option? I
thought it may refer to instead of listing every single email address
in the 'to' field when you send an email to the group, it may just
list the name of the group (which is something I want to work out how
to do). From your reply though, this option just refers to whether the
members of the group are also shown individually in the root of the
address book?

Also, can anyone tell me what is the difference between the name and
distinctive name in the group setup dialog?

(The Bat help file is not all that helpful for certain options, as it
doesn't describe them at all)
-- 

Regards,

Mr Happy



Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Groups

2008-07-24 Thread Mr Happy
Hi everyone,

I want to setup a distribution list for some of the people I have in
my address book. Problem is, when I create a group in the Bat and move
the people into it, their entries are removed from the root level of
the address book. What this means is that if I want to send an email
to a person individually, there is an extra click - I first have to
open the address book and then instead of just double clicking on
their entry, I have to first open the group and then double click on
their entry. Is there another way to do this, or is there a way to
have a person in both a group and the root of the address book at the
same time?
-- 

Regards,

Mr Happy



Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Changing OTFE Password

2008-06-30 Thread Mr Happy
Hi everyone,

Simple question (can't find the answer in the Bat's help file, and a
search of this list didn't give me anything either): how do you change
your OTFE password in The Bat?
-- 

Regards,

Mr Happy



Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Changing OTFE Password

2008-06-30 Thread Mr Happy
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 14:07:06 +0200, Roelof Otten
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Create a full internal backup with TB
Uninstall TB
(re)move your mail directory
Install TB
Run TB
TB will recognize it's being run for the first time and will present some 
options
Enable OTFE
Restore backup
And you're done


In case you're running TB from a restricted user account from Windows,
don't uninstall and install TB, but simply delete the registry key:
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\RIT
For the rest the procedure is the same

Wow, I would have loved to have been in the Ritlabs meeting that came
up with that idea. I bet it went something like this:
Ritlabs Employee #1: Hey, we need a way for our users to change their
OTFE password once they have set it.
Ritlabs Employee #2: Well, let's not go with just the usual option in
the Preferences dialog, that is way too boring.
Ritlabs Employee #1: Ah - I've got it. Let's make them uninstall the
program, delete their mail folder, reinstall the program, run it,
re-enable OTFE and then restore a backup of their mail folder!
Ritlabs Employee #2: Brilliant, you are a genius! Here, have a
payrise!
-- 

Regards,

Mr Happy



Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Odd Behaviour with v4.0.24?

2008-06-30 Thread Mr Happy
Hi everyone,

I've been deleting some emails from The Bat. I went in and deleted an
entire folder (I first deleted all the messages out of it individually
and then right clicked on the folder and went 'Delete'). I then went
into another folder in the same account and suddenly I could hardly do
anything to the messages within - I could not mark as read, or mark as
unread. I could not delete. I could double click to open, and that was
about it. It wasn't just the one folder, this was the same for every
other folder in the account. I then closed The Bat and re-opened it,
and everything is now back to normal. Has anyone else experienced this
behaviour?
-- 

Regards,

Mr Happy



Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html