Re: Time to Upgrade (Was: One caveat about Folder View Settings in v. 2.11.02 [was Re: Time to Upgrade?])

2004-07-14 Thread Douglas Hinds
Hello Mary and others following this thread, In response to the message Mary Bull sent regarding Time to Upgrade (Was: One caveat about Folder View Settings in v. 2.11.02 [was Re: Time to Upgrade?]) Thanks for the note re the v. 2.12 release. As you'd said earlier, it was about to be released

Re: Time to Upgrade (Was: One caveat about Folder View Settings in v. 2.11.02 [was Re: Time to Upgrade?])

2004-07-14 Thread Allie Martin
Douglas Hinds, [DH] wrote: Maybe he needs you to remind him to reprimand me. (But since he participated in this thread with Time to Upgrade as the subject, maybe his understanding of the subject subject is similar to mine). Yes. I thought the subject was fine. -- -=[ Allie Martin ]=- List

Re: Time to Upgrade (Was: One caveat about Folder View Settings in v. 2.11.02 [was Re: Time to Upgrade?])

2004-07-14 Thread Allie Martin
Douglas Hinds, [DH] wrote: How many Sustainable Development, Alternative Agriculture, Co-op, GeneWatch and Political News lists do you subscribe to? You must get more biomed literature, though; and more things that need a reply. It doesn't really matter. Using the dispatcher to screen all

Re: Time to Upgrade (Was: One caveat about Folder View Settings in v. 2.11.02 [was Re: Time to Upgrade?])

2004-07-14 Thread Mary Bull
the subject was fine. Allie, could you please clarify the guidelines a bit more for me, then? I was really trying to cooperate with you when I changed the subject line in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] to One caveat about Folder View Settings in v. 2.11.02 [was Re: Time to Upgrade?] Had I been in PM discussion

Re: Time to Upgrade (Was: One caveat about Folder View Settings in v. 2.11.02 [was Re: Time to Upgrade?])

2004-07-14 Thread Allie Martin
Mary Bull, [MB] wrote: AM Yes. I thought the subject was fine. Allie, could you please clarify the guidelines a bit more for me, then? I was really trying to cooperate with you when I changed the subject line in ... I realize this, empathize and appreciate the efforts you're making at

Re: Time to Upgrade (Was: One caveat about Folder View Settings in v. 2.11.02 [was Re: Time to Upgrade?])

2004-07-14 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Allie! On Wednesday, July 14, 2004, 7:27 AM, you wrote: AM I can only give advice. Sorry for the delay in conversation. We had a little weather here overnight and real life took my attention for awhile here. Your advice is much appreciated. If you don't mind having one more post about

Changing the Subject Header (Was: Time to Upgrade (Was: One caveat about Folder View Settings in v. 2.11.02 [was Re: Time to Upgrade?]))

2004-07-14 Thread Douglas Hinds
Hello Mary and others following this thread, In response to the message Mary Bull sent to Allie on 14/07/2004 regarding Changing the Subject Header (sent with a Subject Header Time to Upgrade (Was: One caveat about Folder View Settings in v. 2.11.02 [was Re: Time to Upgrade?]) Since the focus

Re: Changing the Subject Header (Was: Time to Upgrade (Was: One caveat about Folder View Settings in v. 2.11.02 [was Re: Time to Upgrade?]))

2004-07-14 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Douglas! On Wednesday, July 14, 2004, 8:53 AM, you wrote: DH Secondly Mary, I never bawled you out. I simply changed the Subject DH Header back to what it was, since 1).- the subject hadn't changed DH and 2).- I was using the header to follow up / reply to the answers DH received. One or

Re: Time to Upgrade (Was: One caveat about Folder View Settings in v. 2.11.02 [was Re: Time to Upgrade?])

2004-07-13 Thread Douglas Hinds
Hello Mary, Mic Cullen, Roelof and others following this thread, In response to the reply Mary Bull sent on 13/07/2004 to my request regarding Time to Upgrade?] DH Is TB! v 2.11.02 (the latest release version) stable? MB Yes. it is stable. I've been using it for several weeks now. MB There's

Re: Time to Upgrade (Was: One caveat about Folder View Settings in v. 2.11.02 [was Re: Time to Upgrade?])

2004-07-13 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Douglas! On Tuesday, July 13, 2004, 12:18 PM, you wrote: DH ... What *are* your needs and how does v. 2 do a better job of DH meeting them? Like you, I prefer to select my mails from the Mail Dispatcher. Don't know your other preferences, but I prefer to sort by Received time and view

Re: Time to Upgrade (Was: One caveat about Folder View Settings in v. 2.11.02 [was Re: Time to Upgrade?])

2004-07-13 Thread Andre Wichartz
Hello Douglas, On 13 Jul 2004 at 12:18:35 -0500 GMT [19:18 CEST] you wrote: DH The question is, how are the virtual folders implemented? It sounds DH like messages from several accounts can be viewed in the same DH window, al la Calypso (which has an account column). They are folders that

Re: Time to Upgrade (Was: One caveat about Folder View Settings in v. 2.11.02 [was Re: Time to Upgrade?])

2004-07-13 Thread Allie Martin
Douglas Hinds, [DH] wrote: The question is, how are the virtual folders implemented? Create one. A folder appears. Go in the properties where you can define what's common to the messages that are to be displayed. There you can define strings and where they are pretty much as in filters. You

Re: Time to Upgrade (Was: One caveat about Folder View Settings in v. 2.11.02 [was Re: Time to Upgrade?])

2004-07-13 Thread Douglas Hinds
Hello Allie, Andre, Mary and others following this thread, Thanks to all those who've take the time to respond. BTW, is *anyone+ else still using TB! v 1.x? In response to the message Allie Martin sent on 13/07/2004 regarding Time to Upgrade (Was: One caveat about Folder View Settings in v

Re: Time to Upgrade (Was: One caveat about Folder View Settings in v. 2.11.02 [was Re: Time to Upgrade?])

2004-07-13 Thread Allie Martin
Douglas Hinds, [DH] wrote: AM From there new matches are dynamically added as the real folders are AM watched. Andre mentioned using it for the messages he wants to reply to. I do the same. I created a colour group for replies. I then created a VF which will list all messages unreplied to and

Re: Time to Upgrade (Was: One caveat about Folder View Settings in v. 2.11.02 [was Re: Time to Upgrade?])

2004-07-13 Thread Douglas Hinds
Hello Mary and others following this thread, In response to the message Mary Bull sent on 13/07/2004 regarding Time to Upgrade (Was: One caveat about Folder View Settings in v. 2.11.02 [was Re: Time to Upgrade?]) DH ... What *are* your needs and how does v. 2 do a better job of DH meeting them

Re: Time to Upgrade (Was: One caveat about Folder View Settings in v. 2.11.02 [was Re: Time to Upgrade?])

2004-07-13 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Douglas! On Tuesday, July 13, 2004, 7:50 PM, you wrote: DH These are undoubtedly Moldavian terms g. No. PCWSmileys are a feature that Leif had the help of 9Val to work out, and I was among a half dozen or so early beta testers on them, which soon mushroomed to many dozens, as the interest

Re: Time to Upgrade (Was: One caveat about Folder View Settings in v. 2.11.02 [was Re: Time to Upgrade?])

2004-07-13 Thread Douglas Hinds
Hello Allie and others following this thread, In response to the message Allie Martin sent on 13/07/2004 regarding Time to Upgrade (Was: One caveat about Folder View Settings in v. 2.11.02 [was Re: Time to Upgrade?]) AM From there new matches are dynamically added as the real AM folders