Hello Thomas,
On Tuesday, February 15, 2011 you wrote:
TF> Hello Akebono,
TF> On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 10:50:03 +0100 GMT (11/Feb/11, 16:50 PM +0700 GMT),
TF> Akebono Translation Service wrote:
ATS>> It seems The Bat converts the combination of "y&m" to µ in IE's web
ATS>> address bar if this combin
Hello Akebono,
On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 10:50:03 +0100 GMT (11/Feb/11, 16:50 PM +0700 GMT),
Akebono Translation Service wrote:
ATS> It seems The Bat converts the combination of "y&m" to µ in IE's web
ATS> address bar if this combination is found within a link in an HTML
ATS> e-mail (if the format is p
On Friday, February 11, 2011, 19:41:20, Jonathan Bayer wrote:
> You aren't seeing the escapes behind the scene. While you may see that
> in your browser, if you look at the source you will see & instead of
> the ampersand.
It really depends - some of Google's URLs use & and others use
just &.
Hi
On Friday 11 February 2011 at 10:22:13 AM, in
, Jernej Simoncic
wrote:
> On Friday, February 11, 2011, 10:56:56, Akebono
> Translation Service wrote:
>> P.S. The mail is encoded in utf-8 and the source
>> clearly says y&m, not µ
> If the source says something like href="http://www.example
On 2/11/11 12:42 PM, Jeff Gaines wrote:
Hello Jernej
On Friday, February 11, 2011, 4:55:16 PM, you wrote:
No,& should always be escaped in HTML - URLs are no exception.
But Google search uses for example:
http://www.google.com/search?q=ampersand&hl=en&num=10&lr=lang_en&ft=i&cr=&safe=images&
Hello Jernej
On Friday, February 11, 2011, 4:55:16 PM, you wrote:
> No, & should always be escaped in HTML - URLs are no exception.
But Google search uses for example:
http://www.google.com/search?q=ampersand&hl=en&num=10&lr=lang_en&ft=i&cr=&safe=images&tbs=lr%3Alang_1en
--
Jeff Gaines
__
On Friday, February 11, 2011, 15:58:53, Sam Brown wrote:
> That's accurate except in this case. The reason the & character shouldn't be
> used in HTML is because it's a key element in the parsing of URLs (the &
> character separates parameters in the URL). So in this case, where the &
> character
- Original Message
> From: Jernej Simončič
> If the source says something like href="http://www.example.com/foo?bar=y&m=baz";>
> that's illegal HTML, and the result is not surprising. All &
> characters in HTML must be written as &. If a bare & appears in
> source, different HTML pars
Dear Jernej,
> All &
> characters in HTML must be written as &.
That explains a lot and solved my issue. Thanks a lot!
Best regards,
Loek van Kooten
=
Please subscribe to our newsletter for updates about our agency (holidays,
address changes, etc.). It is sent once or twice a year and c
On Friday, February 11, 2011, 10:56:56, Akebono Translation Service wrote:
> P.S. The mail is encoded in utf-8 and the source clearly says y&m, not µ
If the source says something like http://www.example.com/foo?bar=y&m=baz";>
that's illegal HTML, and the result is not surprising. All &
characters
Dear all,
> It seems The Bat converts the combination of "y&m" to µ in IE's web
> address bar if this combination is found within a link in an HTML
> e-mail (if the format is plain text, this does not happen).
P.S. The mail is encoded in utf-8 and the source clearly says y&m, not µ
Best regards,
me=heµaster=1
in IE
Is this a known bug? It seems pretty serious to me!
Best regards,
Loek van Kooten
=
Please subscribe to our newsletter for updates about our agency (holidays,
address changes, etc.). It is sent once or twice a year and contains
important information only -- no s
Hello Raymund,
On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 10:43:45 +0200 GMT (25/Sep/10, 15:43 PM +0700 GMT),
Raymund Tump wrote:
>> What's the story with the "Inbox - Known" folder?
RT> Well, there should be a Known filter in your sorting office. That
RT> would move all messages t
Hi :
What's the story with the "Inbox - Known" folder?
Thanks.
Regards,
Gary Odom
g...@waterfire.us
Current version is 4.2.23 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Hello Peter,
On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 you wrote in
PM> There is a new version of Voyager, based on The Bat! 3.81.14 Beta.
You had me all excited there for a minute until I realised that it's not
exactly new and it's the one I have already installed :-(
--
Regards,
Richard
| The Bat! 3.81.17 RC1.
Hi Andrew,
on Wed, 30 Aug 2006 13:08:58 -0600GMT (30.08.2006, 21:08 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:
AAD> Mystery solved, thanks! Outside of mail lists most of the mail I get
AD> is from known people, so I don't think I'll wind up using it. If
AD> Inbox - Known was just a referenc
Hello Chris,
Tuesday, August 29, 2006, 7:38:25 PM, you wrote:
> Andrew Diederich @ 2006-8-29 8:30:02 PM
> "What is Inbox - Known for?"
>> I have a folder called "Inbox - Known" in one of my two accounts,
>> but nothing is in it. I can't figure out
Andrew Diederich @ 2006-8-29 8:30:02 PM
"What is Inbox - Known for?"
> I have a folder called "Inbox - Known" in one of my two accounts,
> but nothing is in it. I can't figure out what _should_ be in it,
> either. It does look like a system generated folder.
Hello Batfolk,
I have a folder called "Inbox - Known" in one of my two accounts, but
nothing is in it. I can't figure out what _should_ be in it, either.
It does look like a system generated folder. What's it for?
Thanks for the help.
--
Andrew Diederich
Using Voyager v3
Hello,
Sunday, June 11, 2006, 7:48:12 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> When I put my cursor on Inbox-Known, and go to Account Properties, the
> "Common Folder Properties" comes up. In that Properties box, all I get
> are Options, Templates, Memo and Chat. Under Template
Sunday, June 11, 2006, Robert D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Generally, [EMAIL PROTECTED] foretold :
z>> How can I get the Inbox-Known to ignor the Reading Confirmation
z>> Request?
> I believe you can set it in Properties of Inbox-Known :
> Templates | Over-ride | Ignor
Generally, [EMAIL PROTECTED] foretold :
z> How can I get the Inbox-Known to ignor the Reading Confirmation
z> Request?
I believe you can set it in Properties of Inbox-Known :
Templates | Over-ride | Ignore
--
Regards,
Robert D.
:flag-us-ky:
_
The Bat! Version: 3
Two questions on Inbox-Known:
1. When my cursor in on Inbox-Known and I on New Message, the account
that is being used is Account1234, by default. I don't recall setting
the account to be used for Inbox-known. Is there a way to set the
default account to another account? [I don't kn
Hi
On Sunday 4 December 2005 at 9:19:52 PM, in
, Roelof Otten wrote:
M>> You may find it re-created the next time you start TB!
> IIRC that depends on whether the known filter is active or not.
Only tried once and it came back. I expect the filter was active
because I think I h
on whether the known filter is active or not.
--
Groetjes, Roelof
When you're a little rabbit, carry a big gun.
The Bat! 3.63.06 (Beta)
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
1 pop3 account, server on LAN
OTFE enabled
P4 3GHz
2 GB RAM
pgppAScVzxkg3.pgp
Descri
Hello MFPA,
Sunday, December 4, 2005, 1:04:28 PM, you wrote:
M> You may find it re-created the next time you start TB!
Nope. Didnt show up.
--
Darrin
Using The Bat! v3.62.14 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Service Pack 2
Current version is 3.6
Hi
On Sunday 4 December 2005 at 12:46:39 PM, in
, Darrin wrote:
> I dont really think of any reason why I would need it anyway. So I
> think Ill just delete it.
You may find it re-created the next time you start TB!
--
Best regards,
MFPA
We are all in the gutte
Hello Roelof,
Sunday, December 4, 2005, 12:30:56 AM, you wrote:
RO> My own inbox-known is rarely used for the
RO> latter reason, hardly any message from people in my AB gets past my
RO> real filters.
I dont really think of any reason why I would need it anyway. So I
think Ill just
actually showing up in my inbox-known
D> folder. What do you suppose is wrong here?
I guess your known filter could be inactive or all messages could be
processed by other filters. My own inbox-known is rarely used for the
latter reason, hardly any message from people in my AB gets past my
Hello friends,
In my address book I have some listed in the default personal address
book. Others listed in different groups. I dont notice emails from any
of the people in my address book actually showing up in my inbox-known
folder. What do you suppose is wrong here?
--
Darrin
Using The Bat
oomba, then somebody else did; I persevered with Poco. What a waste of
a year.
Now, I've just gone through my ten accounts and activated the 'inbox - known'
filter but on one of those accounts (the third to be stet up) it was missing.
Not a great problem - I just created it, but d
Hallo Thomas,
On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 23:14:15 +0700GMT (13-7-2005, 18:14 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
a>> I don't use the Known filter which is created by default. Is it Ok to
a>> delete the Known Inbox? This is a special folder so I don't want to
a>> regret this l
Hello alien,
On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 12:03:25 -0300 GMT (13/07/2005, 22:03 +0700 GMT),
alien wrote:
a> I don't use the Known filter which is created by default. Is it Ok to
a> delete the Known Inbox? This is a special folder so I don't want to
a> regret this later on.
It'
Hallo alien,
On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 12:03:25 -0300GMT (13-7-2005, 17:03 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
A> I don't use the Known filter which is created by default.
That's totally up to you.
A> Is it Ok to delete the Known Inbox?
Yes.
A> This is a special folder so I don&#x
Hi TBUDL'ers,
I don't use the Known filter which is created by default. Is it Ok to
delete the Known Inbox? This is a special folder so I don't want to
regret this later on.
--
thanks!
alien
.. Using The Bat! v3.5.26 on
.. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 -
Hello Jeff,
Saturday, June 18, 2005, 1:18:07 AM, you wrote:
> The condition is:
> Address Book Contains Sender
> Action is:
> Move To The Folder (folder name)
Great! Thank you much :)
--
Best regards,
Darrin
d and nothing. I know how to re-create the known inbox, but
> how do I re-create the filter?
> Thanks
The condition is:
Address Book Contains Sender
Action is:
Move To The Folder (folder name)
--
Jeff Gaines Damerham Hampshire UK
:Jeff_Gaines:
_
Hello Thomas,
Friday, June 17, 2005, 8:22:23 AM, you wrote:
> The fitler should be there by default under the Incoming
> filters. It has a tickbox for Active - maybe yours is not ticked.
I checked and nothing. I know how to re-create the known inbox, but
how do I re-create the filter?
On Friday, June 17, 2005, 11:23:05 AM, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
DAC>> I recently made the switch from POP to IMAP.
> Oh sorry. I don't know about IMAP, I was talking about POP.
I don't know either. Figured the only to learn whether that was
because of the differences, or whether it was an oversig
Hello Dwight,
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 10:50:52 -0500 GMT (17/06/2005, 22:50 +0700 GMT),
Dwight A Corrin wrote:
DAC> I recently made the switch from POP to IMAP.
Oh sorry. I don't know about IMAP, I was talking about POP.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Ladies, don't forget the rummage sale. It is a good chan
Hello Dwight A Corrin & everyone else,
on 17-Jun-2005 at 17:56 you (Dwight A Corrin) wrote:
> sending the send button
That button didn't arrive here yet, however... ;-)
SCNR!
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981)
Deliplayer2 is playing: "Dub Angel" (3:49) by
On Friday, June 17, 2005, 10:50:52 AM, Dwight A Corrin wrote:
> I recently made the switch from POP to IMAP. I have created a few
> local filters for my new IMAP account, so I just took a look at that
> account's sorting office, and find no 'known' filter there.
a
ccount, so I just took a look at that
account's sorting office, and find no 'known' filter there.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
928 S Broadway
Wichita KS 67211
316.303.1411 fax 316.265.7568
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
Using The Bat! 3.5.27 on W
Hello Darrin,
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 19:20:24 -0700 GMT (17/06/2005, 09:20 +0700 GMT),
Darrin wrote:
D> It is the latter. I happen to look in the sorting office and there is
D> no filters for known senders. So I guess I have to create one?
The fitler should be there by default under the In
a
>> sender address that is really in your address book and
>> the filter is active.
>
> It is the latter. I happen to look in the sorting office and there is
> no filters for known senders. So I guess I have to create one?
It one time it was created automatically. It was
cal
gt; the filter is active.
It is the latter. I happen to look in the sorting office and there is
no filters for known senders. So I guess I have to create one?
--
Best regards,
Darrin
Current version is 3.5.25
On Thu 16-Jun-05 8:21pm -0500, Darrin wrote:
> I thought that all mail from users in my address book will go into
> "inbox-known" automatically. Doesnt seem to work. Is there something
> I must do to get this working?
What do you mean by "doesn't seem to work?
Hello TBUDL,
I thought that all mail from users in my address book will go into
"inbox-known" automatically. Doesnt seem to work. Is there something
I must do to get this working?
--
Best regards,
Darrin
Current version
Hello Sharyn,
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 11:16:13 -0500 GMT (09/02/2005, 23:16 +0700 GMT),
Sharyn Hutchens wrote:
SH> But I can't find the filter to make the Known folder work. This is
SH> TB v3.0.1.33
Account / Sorting Office / Incoming /
It works on email addresses in your addressbook.
Hello Sharyn,
Wednesday, February 9, 2005, 10:20:58 AM, you wrote:
S> You just fixed my problem, Leif -- thanks! And I've added the
S> dash-dash-space-return to my templates too. I didn't know that
S> trick (though I bet it's in the welcome file and I'd just forgotten
S> it)
You're very welcome,
Leif writes:
> On the options tab for the Known filter, is the box for making the
> filter Active checked?
You just fixed my problem, Leif -- thanks! And I've added the
dash-dash-space-return to my templates too. I didn't know that trick (though I
bet it's in the welc
the new versions. But I can't find the filter to make the
S> Known folder work. This is TB v3.0.1.33 and Bayesit 0.7.3. I'm
S> quite sure it's obvious, but I'm throwing in the towel....help?
On the options tab for the Known filter, is t
Just had to install TB on another computer and have finally gotten everything
working right. I'm thoroughly enjoying the upgrades to both TB and Bayesit --
most everything that bothered me is gone with the new versions. But I can't
find the filter to make the Known folder work.
llow for a real "conversation thread" with that
person (or AB group).
I'm using a "known" filter to move messages from my inbox to more "global"
directories like "friends & family" (or "work" or "colleagues", or
whatever, its just
ecific individuals, sending their
e-mails to specific folders.
> If your Known Inbox was created by Upgrading from version 2, I would
> just delete the criteria part and recreate it the way you want it.
> Depending on when you upgraded there was some bugs in the process
> that caused e
Hello Anthony,
Tuesday, October 12, 2004, 10:37:14 PM, you wrote:
AGA> Since nobody has stepped forward to clarify the details of how the known
AGA> filter works and it isn't documented anywhere that I can find, I can
AGA> only assume that it is top secret and not intended to ac
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Anthony,
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, Anthony mused about "Known filter explanation"
(at least in part):
AGA> Since nobody has stepped forward to clarify the details of how the known
AGA> filter works and it isn't documented any
Since nobody has stepped forward to clarify the details of how the known
filter works and it isn't documented anywhere that I can find, I can
only assume that it is top secret and not intended to actually be used.
Is this correct?
--
An
Hi
On Sunday, 10 October, 2004, at 3:50:11 PM, Anthony G. Atkielski wrote:
>It doesn't seem to work when I try it.
Have you selected which address books to use? I have them
unchecked as I do not wish to use this feature.
> Also, what gets generated in place of $KNOWN$ for a fol
Hallo Alexander,
On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 17:19:58 +0200GMT (10-10-2004, 17:19 +0200, where
I live), you wrote:
>>> You'd have to set up a "final" subfilter that will move the message to your
>>> "general newsletter" location if it wasn't caught by any other subfilter
>>> before.
>> I just tested thi
Hallo Thorvald,
On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 16:56:53 +0200GMT (10-10-2004, 16:56 +0200, where
I live), you wrote:
>> Incoming filters (including subfilters) don't care about the folder
>> where the message is.
TN> My incoming filters in v1.x and 2.x have always (at least for me)
TN> treated the mails fro
rocessing is turned on in Filter 1 will
then send the message to the Known folder.
- if Continue processing is turned off in Filter 1
will not be acted on.
This is different than how the OFS worked.
In other words don't turn on "Continue Processing" unless you wan
o a
mailinglist. If this is true, it should be moved from the inbox to a
specific list folder. If untrue, the next filter should take over. At
the end of the filter list, I have my known filter.
If now the sender is in my address book and on the same mailinglist,
the mail does get moved from the mailin
Hello Thorvald,
Saturday, October 9, 2004, 8:12:57 AM, you wrote:
TN> It is set before my SPAM-filters get active (so the known filter is
TN> the last filter for valid emails).
TN> I now and then receive some emails which get sorted to specific
TN> folders before they get in touch wi
Hæ!
I am experiencing something strange.
I activated a Known filter for one account which uses:
TB! Message Filter
beginFilter
UID: [F41F9220.01C4A5F6.4920F440.19A28B47]
Name:
Filter: {\0D\0A\20`11`0`0`0\0D\0A}
MoveMessage folder \5C\5CMyAccountName\5CInbox\20-\20Known
IsContinue
Saturday, September 4, 2004, 1:12:45 AM, you wrote:
ASK> Right-click on the Virtual Folder and open its
ASK> properties. There's a tab
ASK> "Filter". Is the checkbox "use filter" ticked?
Nothing is ticked in the properties for that filter except
'remove old messages' and 'compress the folder' ..
Friday, September 3, 2004, 10:29:40 AM, you wrote:
MM> I know it cannot help *now*, when the corruption
MM> already happened, but it can save lots of future
MM> screams, and perhaps modify them to the ones of a
MM> pleasure. (-:
Hmm. Well, that folder wasn't one that I restored with
TB's utility
Hello Lynn,
04-Sep-2004 06:42, you wrote:
ASK>> What if you alter the filtering rules to something... simple?
> There is no filtering to that folder that I'm aware of - am I missing
> something?
Right-click on the Virtual Folder and open its properties. There's a tab
"Filter". Is the checkbox "
Friday, September 3, 2004, 5:13:55 AM, you wrote:
>> It was saying 174 messages in it, though showing none,
>> and I managed to delete them, or at least it's not
>> showing them any more, but it *still* says there are
>> parked messages ...
ASK> What if you alter the filtering rules to something
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
***^\ ."_)~~
~( __ _"o Was Thu, 2 Sep 2004, at 16:45:47 -0700,
@ @ when Lynn wrote:
> Thursday, September 2, 2004, 3:43:48 PM, you wrote:
>>> However, in messing around I created a virtual inbox
>>> folder which I can't now get rid
Hello Lynn,
03-Sep-2004 01:45, you wrote:
> It was saying 174 messages in it, though showing none,
> and I managed to delete them, or at least it's not showing
> them any more, but it *still* says there are parked
> messages ...
What if you alter the filtering rules to something... simple?
--
Thursday, September 2, 2004, 3:43:48 PM, you wrote:
>> However, in messing around I created a virtual inbox
>> folder which I can't now get rid of; it says there are
>> parked messages in it, which there are not, that I can
>> find, but I can't delete it.
M> Can't you rename it? And/or change th
Hello Lynn,
> However, in messing around I created a virtual inbox
> folder which I can't now get rid of; it says there are
> parked messages in it, which there are not, that I can
> find, but I can't delete it.
Can't you rename it? And/or change the folder(s) it is watching?
--
Best regards,
Hi all -
I have a frustrating problem.
When I installed the first v2 TB, something bad happened to
my templates, and I hoped that installing v2.12 would fix
them. As it didn't, (apparently when I imported the
backups, I imported the problem too) I deinstalled and
reinstalled.
Naturally, that dum
Hi Paul,
On 7/22/2004 12:10 PM my time, Paul wrote:
PC> I think if you add a folder called $KNOWN$
PC> that will add it back.
PC> when I right-click an accounts inbox-known, the name shows as :
PC> $KNOWN$
PC> with the "$" on both sides.
That did the trick thanks :
Hello Darrin,
DR> Anyone know how to get it back?
DR> Thanks
I think if you add a folder called $KNOWN$
that will add it back.
when I right-click an accounts inbox-known, the name shows as :
$KNOWN$
with the "$" on both sides.
--
Bes
Hello,
Anyone know how to get it back?
Thanks
--
Darrin
WinXP Home Service Pack 1
Tbat! 2.12.00
pgpdGJieGYy2z.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Current version is 2.12.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInf
Hello WilWilWil,
Wednesday, May 26, 2004, 9:49:00 AM, you wrote:
WilWilWil> I apologize if I do not respect rules. You explain these
WilWilWil> rules but I am French and I've a lot of difficulties to
WilWilWil> understand what was wrong in my post and what you explain
WilWilWil> to me.
No problem
TED]>
To: WilWilWil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tuesday, May 25, 2004, 9:36:09 PM
Subject: Mod: Top posting (was: Problem with mail and $KNOWN$ folder...)
LG> Hi WilWilWil,
LG> On Tue, 25 May 2004, at 21:33:11 [GMT +0200] (which was 1:33 PM where
LG> I live) you wrote:
W>> It is
Hi,
It is the only one filter...
WilWilWil
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
==Original message text===
From: Edgar van Dijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tuesday, May 25, 2004, 8:38:38 AM
Subject: Problem with mail and $K
Hello WilWilWil,
On Monday, May 24, 2004, 6:04:21 PM, Peter answered you:
W>> WHY the mails of my friends (who are in my addresses
W>> book) go to the receipt folder
W>> and not in the KNOWN receipt folder ?
P> Is the Known filter activated? (Account » Sorting Office/Filte
Hi WilWilWil,
on Mon, 24 May 2004 16:38:37 +0200GMT, you wrote:
W> WHY the mails of my friends (who are in my addresses book) go to the receipt folder
W> and not in the KNOWN receipt folder ?
Is the Known filter activated? (Account » Sorting Office/Filters »
Incoming mail)
--
Cheers
he correct addresses book checked.
WHY the mails of my friends (who are in my addresses book) go to the receipt folder
and not in the KNOWN receipt folder ?
Thanks
WilWilWil (France)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current version is 2.10.0
Monday, March 1, 2004, 1:22:12 PM, Urban wrote:
U> Sunday, February 29, 2004, Allister Jenks wrote:
>> Alas, this does not seem to be possible?
U> Play on sound on incoming mail in the folder that $known$ filters to and
U> set the $known$ filter to continue processing.
Thanks Ur
Sunday, February 29, 2004, Allister Jenks wrote:
> Alas, this does not seem to be possible?
Play on sound on incoming mail in the folder that $known$ filters to and
set the $known$ filter to continue processing.
--
Urban
A harp is a nude pi
Hello Deborah,
> I should read subject-lines, shouldn't I? :-)
What is a subject line? ;-)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v2.04.7
Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silver
On Sunday, February 29, 2004, 10:57:33 AM, MAU wrote:
M> Not in the Known filter :)
I should read subject-lines, shouldn't I? :-)
--
Deborah
We seek the truth and will endure the consequences.
Using The Bat! v2.02.3 CE on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195
Servic
Hello Deborah,
> There's an option to "Play sound" on the Actions tab of the filter,
> which includes the option to play the wav file of your choice
Not in the Known filter :)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
U
> *real* email has arrived.
DW> There's an option to "Play sound" on the Actions tab of the filter,
DW> which includes the option to play the wav file of your choice
I can't find this for the built-in $known$ filters or folders...
As a work around, you can create your own
On Sunday, February 29, 2004, 6:09:05 AM, Allister Jenks wrote:
AJ> Yes, I know it *is* special, but I had an idea that I wanted a
AJ> sound to be played when something was filtered by it - i.e. some
AJ> *real* email has arrived.
There's an option to "Play sound" on the Actions tab of the filter,
Hello TBUDLers,
Yes, I know it *is* special, but I had an idea that I wanted a sound to
be played when something was filtered by it - i.e. some *real* email has
arrived.
Alas, this does not seem to be possible?
--
Cheers,
Allister
Current vers
Hallo rich,
On Mon, 3 Nov 2003 02:20:11 -0500GMT (3-11-03, 8:20 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
rg> The KNOWN folder has no "Identity" property that will allow
rg> me to write my friends from a 'safe' return address?
That means you'll have to use a 'sa
The KNOWN folder has no "Identity" property that will allow me to write my friends
from a 'safe' return address?
--
Rich
Current version is 2.01.3 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Hello Marck,
MDP> There is no definitive list that I know of. We'll have to beg for a
MDP> straight answer from one of the programmers. Maybe we should ask on
MDP> TBBETA?
The list is right. Currently, From, Reply-To, Return-Path and Sender
fields are used. I've seen the message from Bill about
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Audiac,
@19-Jul-2003, 19:31 +0200 (18:31 UK time) [EMAIL PROTECTED] [A] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>> So I will never use a black list to determine spam. So far I am
>> still trying to get something bayesian that will work for me. I
>> have
Tuesday, July 15, 2003, 10:37:12 PM, MikeD wrote:
> So I will never use a black list to determine spam. So far I am still
> trying to get something bayesian that will work for me. I have hopes
> for the new bayesian plug-in for TB.
Does anyone have any more information on this plugin? For insta
Hello Bill,
On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 00:14:54 -0400 GMT (17/07/03, 11:14 +0700 GMT),
Bill McCarthy wrote:
>> I have a question to those who have their own address in their AB:
>> What is the reason?
> For both BCCing and test mails to myself. I don't like auto complete
> turned on. It's much easie
On Wed 16-Jul-03 7:01pm -0400, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
> I have a question to those who have their own address in their AB:
> What is the reason? - If you keep BBC'ing yourself, you type your own
> address into the BBC field once, and the history function will always
> autocomplete (faster than d
right, back in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I
wrote to you:
,
| It's true that spammers sometimes put your email address in one
| of the "sender" fields, such as Return-Path.
`
> So, now the question becomes - what next
Wednesday, July 16, 2003, 7:01:34 PM, Thomas wrote:
T> I have a question to those who have their own address in their
T> AB: What is the reason?
My reasons are pretty simple. I have many mail groups - tennis
team, swim team board, basketball board, school parents, etc.
(Hmmm. There's a theme there
1 - 100 of 285 matches
Mail list logo
