Re: Invalid date to encode

2002-04-29 Thread Paul Meathrel
Hello Paul, Sunday, April 28, 2002, 9:31:04 PM, you wrote: PM Hi all, PM I have been using TB for about a week and recently upgraded my trial PM to 1.60h. When I now load the program I get a dialog box saying PM invalid date to encode this is quickly obscured by the evaluation PM version

How to do a Reply to sender

2002-04-29 Thread mocha9mail
When I click on the Reply button, it is addressed to the Reply to: address. How do I do a Reply to the From address? e.g. to send a reply to the sender of a list message, instead to TBUDL. Thanks in advance JM Using The Bat! 1.60c Under Windows 98 4.10 Build A

Re: PGP or S/MIME ?

2002-04-29 Thread Nick Andriash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Greg Strong, On Sunday, April 28 2002 at 09:59 PM PDT, you wrote: I was installing WinPT. In the PDF file for the install it refers to OpenPGP that I believe is GPG No... OpenPGP is a standard which GPG... and PGP... are supposed to

Re: Info on Upgrades

2002-04-29 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hello Julius, On Monday, April 29, 2002 at 6:08:18 AM you wrote (at least in part): JS Hi there, JS 1.) As a paid registered user of 1.60C Personal. Can I d/l 1.60h JS and NOT get into a 30-day trial loop again? Yes. Your registration remains valid for all upcoming 1.x version (albeit there

Re[2]: PGP or S/MIME ?

2002-04-29 Thread Greg Strong
Hello Nick, Monday, April 29, 2002, 1:49:15 AM, you wrote: NA Yes, you are right... you can have seamless on the fly signing NA with PGP because there are specific PGP DLL's that TB uses for NA that... RITLabs have developed a Plugin specifically for that NA purpose. Hopefully, the upcoming

Re: Info on Upgrades

2002-04-29 Thread Christopher Taylor-Davies
On Monday, April 29, 2002, 7:57:43 AM, Dierk wrote: Yes. As is somewhere on RITLabs website mentioned, the registration is valid through the complete 1.x series. Is Version 2 imminent? I just purchased 1.6 last week, unaware of impending major upgrades! Regards Christopher

Re: I cannot open email with yellow icon in 1.60h

2002-04-29 Thread David Stone
Hello, Sunday, April 28, 2002, 11:13:48 PM, you wrote: R Hi David DS Is it me should I have done something ;) R a work-around: R go to options, smime choose microsoft CryptoAPI R then the messages will show just fine (after a slight delay) Thank you very much Roel, that has worked and

Re: Info on Upgrades

2002-04-29 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello Christopher! On Monday, April 29, 2002 at 9:19:16 AM you wrote: Is Version 2 imminent? I just purchased 1.6 last week, unaware of impending major upgrades! 1. I am not associated with RITLabs. 2. No, v2 will be the next official release - AFAWK, but it is not imminent. 3. v2 is a

Re: How to do a Reply to sender

2002-04-29 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello mocha9mail! On Monday, April 29, 2002 at 8:48:59 AM you wrote: How do I do a Reply to the From address? e.g. to send a reply to the sender of a list message, instead to TBUDL. Try a right-click on the From field. -- Dierk Haasis http://www.Write4U.de http://Interest.Write4U.de/pongo

Re: Info on Upgrades

2002-04-29 Thread Christopher Taylor-Davies
On Monday, April 29, 2002, 9:44:18 AM, Dierk wrote: 1. I am not associated with RITLabs. 2. No, v2 will be the next official release - AFAWK, but it is not imminent. Thanks for the information - it seems as if v2 is suitably distant to devote time to mastering/tweaking 1.6. As for not

Re: PGP or S/MIME ?

2002-04-29 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Nick, @29 April 2002, 23:49:15 -0700 (07:49 UK time) Nick Andriash wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To my knowledge I have to use the Tray windows application to manually sign messages when using GPG. True, but you can use

Re: How to do a Reply to sender

2002-04-29 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Dierk, @29 April 2002, 09:40:35 +0200 (08:40 UK time) Dierk Haasis wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] How do I do a Reply to the From address? e.g. to send a reply to the sender of a list message, instead to TBUDL. Try a

Re: How to do a Reply to sender

2002-04-29 Thread Marek Mikus
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Marck D Pearlstone wrote: Hi Dierk, @29 April 2002, 09:40:35 +0200 (08:40 UK time) Dierk Haasis wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] How do I do a Reply to the From address? e.g. to send a reply to the sender of a list message, instead to TBUDL. Try

viewing messages sent using html

2002-04-29 Thread Deborah
Hi again thanks to those who helped with the importing from Eudora problem. I installed version 1.6h the import now works well - although all the messages are unread - any ideas how to change that? Another problem however - when I view any email sent to me which was written using html, I get

Re: viewing messages sent using html

2002-04-29 Thread Jernej Simoni
Hello Deborah, 29. april 2002, 12:32:39, you wrote: D Hi again thanks to those who helped with the importing from Eudora D problem. I installed version 1.6h the import now works well - D although all the messages are unread - any ideas how to change that? You can press CtrlM to mark all

Re: viewing messages sent using html

2002-04-29 Thread Michael Disabato
Monday, April 29, 2002, 5:32:39 AM, Deborah scribbled: D Hi again thanks to those who helped with the importing from Eudora D problem. I installed version 1.6h the import now works well - D although all the messages are unread - any ideas how to change that? Right click on the folder and

Re: viewing messages sent using html

2002-04-29 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Deborah, @29 April 2002, 11:32:39 +0100 Deborah wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi again thanks to those who helped with the importing from Eudora problem. I installed version 1.6h the import now works well - although all

Re: PGP or S/MIME ?

2002-04-29 Thread Allie C Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Marck D Pearlstone [MDP] wrote: ... Yes, you are right... you can have seamless on the fly signing with PGP because there are specific PGP DLL's that TB uses for that... RITLabs have developed a Plugin specifically for that purpose. Hopefully,

Re: viewing messages sent using html

2002-04-29 Thread Paul Cartwright
On Monday, April 29, 2002, 7:00 AM, you wrote: I had that same issue when I imported 5,000+ messages and 100 folders from OE. It would have been nice to either highlight the inbox and CTR-M and include sub-folders, or be able to highlight multiple folders.. thanks, Paul Hi again thanks to

Re: How to do a Reply to sender

2002-04-29 Thread Tim Musson
Hey Marck, My MUA believes you used Ritlabs SecureBat! (v1.60d/iKey1000) to write the following on Monday, April 29, 2002 at 5:55:39 AM. How do I do a Reply to the From address? e.g. to send a reply to the sender of a list message, instead to TBUDL. Try a right-click on the From field. MDP

Re: PGP or S/MIME ?

2002-04-29 Thread Paul Cartwright
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday, April 29, 2002, 5:49 AM, you wrote: I'm new to both TB and PGP. Would it be any better to install gpg ? would I gain/lose any TB capabilitites using gpg over PGP6.5.8 ? thanks, MDP Not true, actually Nick. I use GPG without any tray

Re: PGP or S/MIME ?

2002-04-29 Thread Allie C Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Paul Cartwright [PC] wrote: ... PC I'm new to both TB and PGP. Would it be any better to install gpg PC ? would I gain/lose any TB capabilitites using gpg over PGP6.5.8 ? Using either GnuPG or PGP will not affect TB!'s capabilities. If you're

Re: PGP or S/MIME ?

2002-04-29 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Paul, @29 April 2002, 07:51:38 -0400 (12:51 UK time) Paul Cartwright wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm new to both TB and PGP. Would it be any better to install gpg ? would I gain/lose any TB capabilitites using gpg over

Questions

2002-04-29 Thread Jerry
Hi there I have tried using The Bat and I like it. I miss 2 features, maybe I just can not fint them: 1. Is there a way to start it automatically under Windows? 2. Is there a way I can make the X close window to just iconify, like Becky mailer can? I know I can iconify, but I forget... Then I

Re: Questions

2002-04-29 Thread Tim Musson
Hey Jerry, My MUA believes you used THOR 2.6a (Amiga;TCP/IP) to write the following on Monday, April 29, 2002 at 11:04:36 AM. J Hi there J I have tried using The Bat and I like it. I miss 2 features, maybe J I just can not fint them: J 1. Is there a way to start it automatically under Windows?

re: Questions

2002-04-29 Thread Jerry
Hey Jerry, My MUA believes you used THOR 2.6a (Amiga;TCP/IP) to write the following on Monday, April 29, 2002 at 11:04:36 AM. J Hi there J I have tried using The Bat and I like it. I miss 2 features, maybe J I just can not fint them: J 1. Is there a way to start it automatically under Windows?

Re: Questions

2002-04-29 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Jerry, @29 April 2002, Jerry wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 1. Is there a way to start it automatically under Windows? Put a shortcut into the Windows Start | Programs | Startup folder. Add the /NOLOGO command line parameter

Re: Questions

2002-04-29 Thread Miguel A. Urech
Hello Jerry, 5. Is there any plan to integrate offline news viewer with the Bat? I found Bat a s good mailer, I have yet to find a good newsreader program for the Windows :-( I know I am complicated person, but... Having both in one program is a feature also, because you can simply send

1.60h is evil: Vanishing message bodies

2002-04-29 Thread Robert F. Beeger
Hello! I've read about 1.60h here. One wrote that it would be much faster. So I downloaded 1.60h, unpacked the whole contents of the_bat.exe with WinRAR 3b7 into my TheBat-Folder and started it. I found no speed improvements but found that most of the bodies of the messages in my Send-Mail

Re: Expanding and collpasing message threads question

2002-04-29 Thread Daniel Grunberg
Sat, 27 Apr 2002 13:53:11[GMT -0500] (2:53 PM EDST) Allie C Martin wrote: Mark Knipfer [MK] wrote: ... MK In TheBat! 1.60c is there an easy way to expand and collapse the MK current and all message threads in a mail folder? Yes. Ctrl-* expands all threads. CTRL-Shift-* collapses all

shortcuts

2002-04-29 Thread Roel
Hello Tb!-Udl, how do I open the shortcut editor? I think I've been through the whole menu, but I can't seem to find it anymore... -- Der Immer Jodelende Schweizer In Lederhosen Roel [EMAIL PROTECTED] Zum Antworten bitte Lederhosen entfernen * Speelplein Aboe

Re: shortcuts

2002-04-29 Thread Marcus Ohlström
On Monday, April 29, 2002, 17:25, Roel wrote: how do I open the shortcut editor? I think I've been through the whole menu, but I can't seem to find it anymore... View-Edit Shortcuts or Alt-F12. -- Regards, Marcus Ohlström Using The Bat! v1.60g on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service

Re: shortcuts

2002-04-29 Thread Roel
Hi Roel On Mon, 29 Apr 2002 17:25:21 +0200GMT (which was 29/04/2002, 17:25 +0200GMT for me), you wrote: R Hello Tb!-Udl, R how do I open the shortcut editor? R I think I've been through the whole menu, but I can't seem to find R it anymore... Nevermind, I just found it after I sent

Re: viewing messages sent using html

2002-04-29 Thread Deborah L
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002 12:49:20 Jernej Simonhih wrote: D although all the messages are unread - any ideas how to change that? You can press CtrlM to mark all messages read... Yes, I know...but I have so many mailboxessigh... D when I view any email sent to me which was written D using html,

Re: viewing messages sent using html

2002-04-29 Thread Deborah L
-- On Mon, 29 Apr 2002 12:00:34 Marck D Pearlstone wrote: This is because they are no longer HTML but have been converted to an Internal Eudora proprietary format. I have a fairly complex procedure documented for converting these to plain text that relies on the use of Mailbag Assistant as

Re: Questions

2002-04-29 Thread Deborah L
On 29 Apr 2002 16:4:36 +0100 Jerry wrote: 5. Is there any plan to integrate offline news viewer with the Bat? I found Bat a s good mailer, I have yet to find a good newsreader program for the Windows I would also like this, but the only client I've tried which does both is OE - ugh. There's

Re: 1.60h is evil: Vanishing message bodies

2002-04-29 Thread reclutamiento
I have 1.60h and I do not have any problem whatsoever with my 65.000 emails in several folders and 5 accounts. To me, it seems people updgrading from betas into 1.60h is the source problem. I upgraded from 1.60c release version, and to this moment I have not run into any problem. Nor I have ever

Re[2]: 1.60h is evil: Vanishing message bodies

2002-04-29 Thread Robert F. Beeger
Hello reclutamiento, Monday, April 29, 2002, 6:44:06 PM, you wrote: rsn I have 1.60h and I do not have any problem whatsoever with my 65.000 rsn emails in several folders and 5 accounts. rsn To me, it seems people updgrading from betas into 1.60h is the source rsn problem. I upgraded from

subscribe to folder in IMAP4?

2002-04-29 Thread Chill
Hi tbudl, Is it possible to subscribe to folders in IMAP4 with The Bat!? (This is a possibility given by this protocol), if it is possible, how? -- Regards Chill Using Ritlabs SecureBat! v1.60d/iKey1000 (N°S : 7ba406e8d52) on Windows 2000 5.0 ver. 2195

Couldn't verify signature on registration of TB!

2002-04-29 Thread Greg Strong
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello TBUL, I couldn't verify the signature on the email from The Bat! Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] (RITLABS) that was received for registering TB! How do I know if I've received a good registration? This seems STRANGE when TB! seems to encourage using

Re[2]: PGP or S/MIME ?

2002-04-29 Thread Greg Strong
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Allie, Monday, April 29, 2002, 6:12:18 AM, you wrote: ACM Indeed the signing and signature verification aspects work nicely. I ACM don't use GPG Shell for signing messages *at all*. However, for ACM decryption and encryption I use GPG Shell.

Re[2]: PGP or S/MIME ?

2002-04-29 Thread Greg Strong
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Marck, Monday, April 29, 2002, 4:49:05 AM, you wrote: MDP Not true, actually Nick. I use GPG without any tray application. I MDP only use the try tools to access the key manager and lookup keys I MDP don't have on my keyring. All

Advanced Filtering, Alt+left mouse click (WAS Re: Questions)

2002-04-29 Thread Paddy L
Hello Marck, If I should've started a new thread on this, my apologies. On Monday, April 29, 2002, 6:34:24 AM, you wrote: MDP View unread can be done quickly by Alt-clicking on the envelope icon MDP of an unread message. Alt-clicking in the message list is a very MDP simple way of doing a

Re: PGP or S/MIME ?

2002-04-29 Thread Allie C Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Greg Strong [GS] wrote: ... ACM Indeed the signing and signature verification aspects work ACM nicely. I don't use GPG Shell for signing messages *at all*. ACM However, for decryption and encryption I use GPG Shell. GS Great! How do I make it work?

Re[2]: Filter strings

2002-04-29 Thread Fr van Limpt
Hello David! On Saturday 27-04-02 (23:03) you wrote: DE May be the message is being caught by another filter first ? -- I typed the wrong item in the 'location' box and will see what's going to happen with 'kludges' instead ... Read you, Fré. Visit

Re[2]: Filter strings

2002-04-29 Thread Fr van Limpt
Hello Roelof, Op Saturday 27-04-02 (22:54) you wrote: RO Do these messages trigger another filter first? Unless it's RO specifically checked, the first matching filter stops RO comparing messages to the other filters. (See options in RO the filter properties) -- I had started (10

Re: New features in v1.60c vs v1.53

2002-04-29 Thread Haico
On 29-4-2002 at 1:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! Mine is a folder *inside* the Accounts -- some of them, not every Account. They were put there when I installed 1.60c. I collapsed all my Accounts; and I don't see a Separate Inbox-Known folder. How do I set that up (and I can delete

Re: Couldn't verify signature on registration of TB!

2002-04-29 Thread Miguel A. Urech
Hello Greg, How do I know if I've received a good registration? Select Help/About after registering :-) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v1.60c Current Ver: 1.60h FAQ:

Fwd: Re[2]: Filter strings

2002-04-29 Thread Fr van Limpt
This is a forwarded message From: Fré van Limpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Roelof Otten [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Monday, April 29, 2002, 7:37:41 PM Subject: Filter strings ===8==Original message text=== Hello Roelof, I have just given up 'kludges' as location, I'll see what

Realigning hanging indent paragraphs

2002-04-29 Thread Joseph N.
I sometimes use paragraphs with hanging indents. By turning off auto-format, typing the bullet in the first line, and then in subsequent lines tabbing in (automatically to the place of the bullet), the format is as close as TB! comes to fancy, for purposes of lists or emphasis. The one problem

Re: 1.60h is evil: Vanishing message bodies

2002-04-29 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Melissa, @29 April 2002, 09:49:53 -0700 (17:49 UK time) Melissa Reese wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] When I moved from 1.60 to 1.60h, I noticed that I could not open any message that was signed using S/MIME. ... when doing

Re: 1.60h is evil: Vanishing message bodies

2002-04-29 Thread Allie C Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Marck D Pearlstone [MDP] wrote: ... When I installed 1.60c over 1.60h, all was back to normal. MDP ... or you can switch to MS CryptoAPI S/MIME and all is back to MDP normal. Hmmm. I'll give v1.60h a spin then and see how things work out with that

Re: Realigning hanging indent paragraphs

2002-04-29 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Joseph, @29 April 2002, 13:02:02 -0500 (19:02 UK time) Joseph N. wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Is there any way either to insert text so that the lines will flow with respect to the hanging indent, or to reformat so that

Re: 1.60h is evil: Vanishing message bodies

2002-04-29 Thread Allie C Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Allie C Martin [ACM] wrote: ... When I installed 1.60c over 1.60h, all was back to normal. MDP ... or you can switch to MS CryptoAPI S/MIME and all is back to MDP normal. ACM Hmmm. I'll give v1.60h a spin then and see how things work out with ACM

Re: PGP or S/MIME ?

2002-04-29 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Greg, @29 April 2002, 11:50:13 -0500 (17:50 UK time) Greg Strong wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] MDP It already exists and works just as well as PGP. How do I make it work? THANKS! Use the Tools | OpenPGP | Choose OpenPGP

Re[2]: Couldn't verify signature on registration of TB!

2002-04-29 Thread Greg Strong
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Miguel, Monday, April 29, 2002, 12:13:38 PM, you wrote: MAU Select Help/About after registering :-) I tried it and get the pop up which provides registration number and my name. Look like good registration. If I have good registration,

Re: Realigning hanging indent paragraphs

2002-04-29 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hello Marck, On Monday, April 29, 2002 at 8:26:24 PM you wrote (at least in part): Is there any way either to insert text so that the lines will flow with respect to the hanging indent, or to reformat so that the result will still observe the hanging indent? MDP Replace the bullet with a

Re: 1.60h is evil: Vanishing message bodies

2002-04-29 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Monday, April 29, 2002, 1:05:29 PM, Marck D Pearlstone wrote: When I installed 1.60c over 1.60h, all was back to normal. ... or you can switch to MS CryptoAPI S/MIME and all is back to normal. I would submit that you shouldn't be forced to do that to read s/mime messages, but that the

Re: 1.60h is evil: Vanishing message bodies

2002-04-29 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Monday, April 29, 2002, 1:29:00 PM, Allie C Martin wrote: Hmmm. I'll give v1.60h a spin then and see how things work out with that option enabled. For those who don't know, you switch to MS CryptoAPI S/MIME by going to the 'Options menu' and selecting 'S/MIME..'. The option will be in

Re: 1.60h is evil: Vanishing message bodies

2002-04-29 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Allie, @29 April 2002, 13:33:07 -0500 (19:33 UK time) Allie C Martin wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ACM Hmmm. I'll give v1.60h a spin then and see how things work out ACM with that option enabled. I can view S/MIME signed messages alright. However, none of the sigs

Re: Couldn't verify signature on registration of TB!

2002-04-29 Thread Miguel A. Urech
Hello Greg, I tried it and get the pop up which provides registration number and my name. Look like good registration. That's all I cared when I got mine last January. If I have good registration, fine. The error message on the verification was: gpg: invalid armor header: It's

Re: 1.60h is evil: Vanishing message bodies

2002-04-29 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Dwight, @29 April 2002, 13:55:54 -0500 (19:55 UK time) Dwight A Corrin wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ... or you can switch to MS CryptoAPI S/MIME and all is back to normal. I would submit that you shouldn't be forced to

Re: 1.60h is evil: Vanishing message bodies

2002-04-29 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Monday, April 29, 2002, 2:15:47 PM, Marck D Pearlstone wrote: That's assuming, of course, that somebody has reported it as a bug...? mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] on TBBETA -- Dwight A. Corrin P O Box 47828 Wichita KS 67201-7828 316.263.9706 fax 316.263.6385 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The

Re: 1.60h is evil: Vanishing message bodies

2002-04-29 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Dwight, @29 April 2002, 14:26:54 -0500 (20:26 UK time) Dwight A Corrin wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] That's assuming, of course, that somebody has reported it as a bug...? mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] on TBBETA Hmm... I meant

Re: 1.60h is evil: Vanishing message bodies

2002-04-29 Thread Miguel A. Urech
Hello Marck, That sometimes needs a bit of juggling to get the CA certificate into the IE certificate repository. Hey! Are you betraying PGP? ;-) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v1.60c Current

Re[2]: 1.60h is evil: Vanishing message bodies

2002-04-29 Thread Lynna Lunsford
Hello reclutamiento, Monday, April 29, 2002, 8:44:06 AM, you wrote: reclutamiento I have 1.60h and I do not have any problem whatsoever with my 65.000 reclutamiento emails in several folders and 5 accounts. reclutamiento To me, it seems people updgrading from betas into 1.60h is the source

Re[2]: Realigning hanging indent paragraphs

2002-04-29 Thread Joseph N.
Thanks to you and to Peter. Your suggestions both work perfectly. -- JN Current Ver: 1.60h FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators :

Re[2]: 1.60h is evil: Vanishing message bodies

2002-04-29 Thread Lynna Lunsford
Hello Melissa, Monday, April 29, 2002, 8:49:53 AM, you wrote: Reese When I moved from 1.60 to 1.60h, I noticed that I could not open any Reese message that was signed using S/MIME. When I installed 1.60c over Reese 1.60h, all was back to normal. Reese Melissa Is it possible that there is some

Re[2]: 1.60h is evil: Vanishing message bodies

2002-04-29 Thread Lynna Lunsford
Hello Marck, Monday, April 29, 2002, 10:50:27 AM, you wrote: Pearlstone Hi Allie, Pearlstone @29 April 2002, 13:33:07 -0500 (19:33 UK time) Allie C Martin wrote in Pearlstone [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ACM Hmmm. I'll give v1.60h a spin then and see how things work out ACM with

Re[2]: 1.60h is evil: Vanishing message bodies

2002-04-29 Thread Lynna Lunsford
Hello Allie, Monday, April 29, 2002, 10:33:07 AM, you wrote: Martin I can view S/MIME signed messages alright. However, none of the sigs Martin verify as valid. :-/ Funny, when I was using c version the signatures I saw were showing invalid. But when I installed the h versions I could still

Re: 1.60h is evil: Vanishing message bodies

2002-04-29 Thread Allie C Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Lynna Lunsford [LL] wrote: ... ACM Hmmm. I'll give v1.60h a spin then and see how things work out ACM with that option enabled. LL This message showed as having a VALID signature when I viewed it ( LL has the green icon ), my setting is on Microsoft

Re[2]: 1.60h is evil: Vanishing message bodies

2002-04-29 Thread Lynna Lunsford
Hello Allie, Monday, April 29, 2002, 12:30:49 PM, you wrote: Martin -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Martin Hash: SHA1 Martin Lynna Lunsford [LL] wrote: Martin ... ACM Hmmm. I'll give v1.60h a spin then and see how things work out ACM with that option enabled. LL This message showed as

Re[2]: 1.60h is evil: Vanishing message bodies

2002-04-29 Thread Lynna Lunsford
Hello Marck, Monday, April 29, 2002, 10:50:27 AM, you wrote: I can view S/MIME signed messages alright. However, none of the sigs verify as valid. :-/ Pearlstone That sometimes needs a bit of juggling to get the CA certificate into Pearlstone the IE certificate repository. Actually what I

Re[2]: 1.60h is evil: Vanishing message bodies

2002-04-29 Thread Lynna Lunsford
Hello Allie, Monday, April 29, 2002, 12:30:49 PM, you wrote: Martin My messages are PGP signed, not S/MIME signed. The problem we're Martin discussing is with S/MIME signed messages. Monday, April 29, 2002, 12:51:14 PM, you wrote: Lunsford Actually what I am seeing is a THAWTE FREEMAIL

Re: 1.60h is evil: Vanishing message bodies

2002-04-29 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Allie, @29 April 2002, 15:30:49 -0500 (21:30 UK time) Allie C Martin wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] LL This message showed as having a VALID signature when I viewed it LL ( has the green icon ), my setting is on Microsoft API.

1.60h

2002-04-29 Thread syv
Hi tbudl, What's new in 1.60h? I did not see a mention in the readme file. [EMAIL PROTECTED] +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Current Ver: 1.60h FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Lost Connection Centre - Please help

2002-04-29 Thread Charles Collinson
For no apparent reason I can't get the connection centre window to appear. I've checked options I can think of and search this list. How can i get it back. I get the taskbar window/icon but it will show on the desktop. Is there a registry entry for it, or some place I can sort it out. Charles

Re: 1.60x is Evil... It shuts itself down

2002-04-29 Thread Peter Chiou
Hello Peter, Monday, April 29, 2002, 2:19:10 PM, you wrote: PC I first installed 1.60c and when I would reply to messages, it would PC spontaneously shut itself down when I start to type in addresses in PC the CC field or click on the pull down menu on the same field. So PC then I upgraded to

Fatal error in 1.60h when addressing message to non-address-book destination

2002-04-29 Thread Michael Kellogg
I just upgraded from 1.53 to 1.60h and find that I now cannot author emails to people who are NOT in my address book already. What happens is that the instant I type a letter into To, CC, or BCC that makes it clear that the address is not one The Bat can fill in for me, I get a series of a dozen

Re: Fatal error in 1.60h when addressing message to non-address-book destination

2002-04-29 Thread Joseph N.
Your message prompted me to try out an old bug, known to RITlabs, which is still present (at least in 160c). When I click in Lotus Organizer for a contact's address to be inserted as recipient in a new email message, nothing happens unless that person and address are already in a TB! address

Mail folder shows new unread messages, cannot read them

2002-04-29 Thread Mark Knipfer
In TheBat! 1.60h I am experiencing a frequently occurring problem. TheBat receives new e-mails in a mail folder. The number of new unread messages appear out from the folder. The messages appear unread (bold) in the message list. When I press Ctrl+] or Ctrl+[ or even highlight the new unread

Re: Lost Connection Centre - Please help

2002-04-29 Thread Roelof Otten
Hello Charles, On Mon, 29 Apr 2002 23:02:14 +0100GMT (30-4-02, 0:02 +0200GMT, where I live), you wrote: CC For no apparent reason I can't get the connection centre window to appear. CC I've checked options I can think of and search this list. How can i get it CC back. I get the taskbar

Anti-Virus

2002-04-29 Thread syv
Hi tbudl, I use Computer Associate InoculeIT. It can be called from the command line. How can I do that? Options | Virus protection | External plug-in. Only *.bav, it does not call an exe file. Am I missing something? [EMAIL PROTECTED] +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Re: 1.60h is evil: Vanishing message bodies

2002-04-29 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Monday, April 29, 2002, 2:36:07 PM, Marck D Pearlstone wrote: Hmm... I meant in the BugTraq system... If using the bug report from the help menu is no longer an official way to report bugs, it shouldn't be there either. Should add that to the wake up thread perhaps. -- Dwight A. Corrin P

Re: 1.60h is evil: Vanishing message bodies

2002-04-29 Thread Allie C Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Paul Cartwright [PC] wrote: ... PC I have thawte freemail certificates, but I'm not sure how to send PC them with email messages in TB. Outlook was easy, there was a menu PC item. For TB!, it amounts to a menu item as well. In the editor, select

Re: 1.60h is evil: Vanishing message bodies

2002-04-29 Thread Paul Cartwright
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday, April 29, 2002, 4:13 PM, you wrote: well, I am on windows XP, TB 160c and AVG. I'm not sure if I can read SMIME messages, but I have seen no messages in my inbox that I couldn't read. what would it look like if I couldn't read it ? LL

Re: 1.60h is evil: Vanishing message bodies

2002-04-29 Thread Allie C Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Paul Cartwright [PC] wrote: ... PC well, I am on windows XP, TB 160c and AVG. I'm not sure if I can PC read SMIME messages, but I have seen no messages in my inbox that PC I couldn't read. what would it look like if I couldn't read it ? You should

Re: 1.60h is evil: Vanishing message bodies

2002-04-29 Thread Yuki Taga
I'm not having any trouble with vanishing messages, but periodically over the past couple of days, TB (1.60h) seems unable to connect to the server after a while. This is quickly remedied by disconnecting and dialing up again. Never had this problem before 'h', however, and wonder if anyone

Re: 1.60h is evil: Vanishing message bodies

2002-04-29 Thread Allie C Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Gene Gough [GG] wrote: ... GG Bugs that I reported and that they could recreate were entered into GG the system that way and then I was given a pointer to it via e-mail. moderator Would you and all others concerned kindly restrict your quotations

Re: 1.60h is evil: Vanishing message bodies

2002-04-29 Thread Paul Cartwright
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday, April 29, 2002, 9:19 PM, you wrote: I have that option enabled ( checked) already (The enable SMIME), but I didn't have the sign when complete checked. It says I don't have an open pgp private key, but I have PGP6.5.8 installed and a

Re: 1.60h is evil: Vanishing message bodies

2002-04-29 Thread Allie C Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Paul Cartwright [PC] wrote: ... PC I have that option enabled ( checked) already (The enable SMIME), PC but I didn't have the sign when complete checked. It says I don't PC have an open pgp private key, but I have PGP6.5.8 installed and a PC private

Bat.exe vs Bat.rar

2002-04-29 Thread reclutamiento
Which is the difference of this to Bats. the_bat.exe (formal release at ritlabs) tb160h.rar (rar on beta site of ritlabs) Are they the same?? ___ Running Bat v1.60h on Win2000Pro 5.00.2195 Service Pack 2 with Advanced Direct

Re[2]: 1.60h is evil: Vanishing message bodies

2002-04-29 Thread Joseph N.
Paul, Also be sure you have imported your certificate into TB! Under Account/Properties/General, click on the edit personal certificates tab and, if necessary, import your Thawte certificate. JN Allie C Martin wrote on Monday, April 29, 2002: Paul Cartwright [PC] wrote: ... PC I have

Re: 1.60h is evil: Vanishing message bodies

2002-04-29 Thread Pat Gilbert
Richard Evans Tuesday, April 30, 2002, 8:12:56 AM, you wrote: I too had problems with h everytime I closed TB! it crashed and gave me an error message. Now back on C and all happy again Yes I also got the same errors when exiting the Bat 1.60h including an Invalid page fault and a runtime