Original message received from Marcus Ohlström on 20/06/02
MO On Thursday, June 20, 2002, 23:22, Chris Weaven wrote:
The only things that have changed is I've added in the filter to
sort The Bat! using the guidelines attached to the 'welcome' mail
and I've added a few quick templates, but
Hallo Ben,
But TB still prompts me to set it up as the default mail client
everytime I load it up, even if I load it up, click 'Yes', shut down
and then load up again!
are you running WinNT, Win2K or WinXP as a limited user, i.e. without
admin privileges?
In these cases The Bat has not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bonjour Marck D Pearlstone
Le samedi 22 juin 2002, 02:19:04, vous avez écrit :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Claude,
@21 June 2002, 21:48:23 +0200 (20:48 UK time) Claude Renaud wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL
Hello Nick Andriash,
On Sat, 22 Jun 2002 18:39:49 -0700 GMT your local time,
which was Sunday, June 23, 2002, 8:39:49 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Nick Andriash wrote:
Hello rpmathews,
In Reference to your Posting on Saturday, June 22 2002 at 06:30 PM PDT,
I am trying to export TB
Hi Claude,
CR The only thing I know, is that he wrote me from a compuserve
CR address probably with the compuserve software, do you think it
CR could be the reason whyhe was not able to read my message ?
Yes. If he has an old Compuserve Classic account, Compuserve will
translate incoming
Something very strange is happening I have not been receiving any message
from TBUDL since Friday and now, for no apparent reason, all of a sudden I
cannot send any messages from TB! v. 1.60q. I get an error message saying
Edit Message - Recipients Address
Message has not been sent. Server reply
Hi Mats,
In a message with mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 20 Jun 2002 16:10:21 , you typed:
MMI want to run The Bat! in swedish.
Me too, that would be cool. I don't know how to go about to translate
it though. You can do it, because it's available in several languages,
however, i don't know
Hello Listbuds,
I've been reading about the spamcop and filtering, I periodically
receive email from me that is not sent from me. If I look at
the view headers, it says it came from me! How can this be? Now,
I've submitted this to spamcop.. and it just dawned on me that
they may ban regular
Hi [EMAIL PROTECTED],
On Sun, 23 Jun 2002 08:17:33 -0700, you wrote:
Hello Listbuds,
I've been reading about the spamcop and filtering, I periodically
receive email from me that is not sent from me. If I look at
the view headers, it says it came from me! How can this be? Now,
I've
Hi Patrick,
On Sunday, June 23, 2002, 1:06:50 PM, you [PH] wrote:
PH Another way:
PH In addition to my previously posted registry keys you should also
PH import (don't forget to insert your local path ;-)
PH start
PH Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00
PH
On Sunday, June 23, 2002, 3:54:06 PM, Ravi Joshi wrote:
Edit Message - Recipients Address
Message has not been sent. Server reply Error: Message content rejected.
[...]
The first time I tried to send this message to the list I received a
response I was not recognized as a member...so I had
Hello Ravi,
On Sunday, June 23, 2002 at 10:54 GMT -0400, Ravi Joshi [RJ] pressed
random keys until the following was produced:
Something very strange is happening I have not been receiving any
message from TBUDL since Friday and now, for no apparent reason, all
of a sudden I cannot send any
Hello Krister,
On Sun, 23 Jun 2002 17:16:40 +0200 GMT (23/06/02, 22:16 +0700 GMT),
Krister Ekstrom wrote:
MMI want to run The Bat! in swedish.
KE Me too, that would be cool. I don't know how to go about to translate
KE it though. You can do it, because it's available in several languages,
Sunday, June 23, 2002, 8:17:33 AM, you wrote:
awc Hello Listbuds,
awc I've been reading about the spamcop and filtering, I periodically
awc receive email from me that is not sent from me. If I look at
awc the view headers, it says it came from me! How can this be? Now,
awc I've submitted this
Hi Lynn,
On Sun, 23 Jun 2002 10:27:26 -0700, you wrote:
I gather that only someone with SpamCop's resources has
any chance of figuring out where the thing really came
from ..?
Depends on how easy you find it to type a command, or use a website. View the
headers for the email, follow the
On Sunday, June 23, 2002, Jonathan Angliss wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hope this gives you a hint as in how the system works.
You mean how the system *should* work. It works like that for your
mail and mine, and for the legitimate commercial mail we receive. But
it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Claude,
@23 June 2002, 15:08:24 +0200 (14:08 UK time) Claude Renaud wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
moderator
Please try to trim your replies to just show context.
Yours even included my PGP signature and the list footers!
Please forgive me but I am unable to receive messages from the list
(apparently regardless of my email client) and as such cannot respond to
those that responded to my earlier post. Unfortunately I am forced to
have somewhat of a one way conversation. I have unsubscribed and
re-subscribed to the
Hello Ravi Joshi,
In Reference to your Posting on Sunday, June 23 2002 at 03:10 PM PDT,
Still cannot send any mail from TB! but can do so with OE and Becky. I
have checked my Account settings, I have uninstalled and re-installed
twice and I have installed a backup version of 1.60q. Still
On Sunday, June 23, 2002, 3:54:06 PM, Ravi Joshi wrote:
Edit Message - Recipients Address
Message has not been sent. Server reply Error: Message content rejected.
[I am sending this to the list and via PM]
Was all of this in the error message? Where was the error message?
In the TB Account
On Sunday, June 23, 2002, 11:10:27 PM, Ravi Joshi wrote:
Still cannot send any mail from TB! but can do so with OE and Becky. I
have checked my Account settings, I have uninstalled and re-installed
twice and I have installed a backup version of 1.60q. Still nothing
works ; (.
Well, messages
On 21-6-2002 at 19:06, Joseph N. wrote:
Hi Joseph,
I had read several times that Gravity was no longer being developed or
supported. But then I've read here some new references to it. I went
online to find it, but found only old references and couldn't even
connect to MicroPlanet. Is
On 22-6-2002 at 13:42, Allie C Martin wrote:
moderator
This OT thread which is allowed only if it's kept short is getting out
of hand. Would you kindly take it off list from hence forth.
Thanks.
/moderator
I apologize for sending the last message. Saw this just after my
reply on this
Hi Joseph,
On Sun, 23 Jun 2002 13:05:49 -0500, you wrote:
You mean how the system *should* work. It works like that for your
mail and mine, and for the legitimate commercial mail we receive. But
it doesn't work like that for most UBE that comes from fly-by-night
senders. Sometimes the
Hi Nick,
The headers for a message I composed are as follows (note: this message
never went anywhere b/c it was rejected by the server):
Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2002 22:37:01 -0400
From: Ravi Joshi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.60q) Personal
Reply-To: Ravi Joshi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sunday, June 23, 2002, 10:50:29 AM, you wrote:
JA Hi Lynn,
JA On Sun, 23 Jun 2002 10:27:26 -0700, you wrote:
I gather that only someone with SpamCop's resources has
any chance of figuring out where the thing really came
from ..?
JA Depends on how easy you find it to type a command, or
JA
Hello Lynn,
On Sun, 23 Jun 2002 20:39:20 -0700 GMT (24/06/02, 10:39 +0700 GMT),
Lynn Turriff wrote:
LT I thought the last routing (closest to the body of the
LT mail) was the originator ... no?
Yes. But some spammers put fill in some forged additional Received
lines, so that the real info is
Sunday, June 23, 2002, 8:42:50 PM, you wrote:
TF Hello Lynn,
TF On Sun, 23 Jun 2002 20:39:20 -0700 GMT (24/06/02, 10:39 +0700 GMT),
TF Lynn Turriff wrote:
LT I thought the last routing (closest to the body of the
LT mail) was the originator ... no?
TF Yes. But some spammers put fill in some
Hi Lynn,
On Sun, 23 Jun 2002 20:39:20 -0700, you wrote:
[snip]
I have no problem with the command line, but it's not
clear to me how this helps with a header that contains
only my mail address in the header, in both the 'from' and
'to' positions .. or will it extract the *actual* sender's
Hi Lynn,
On Sun, 23 Jun 2002 21:00:08 -0700, you wrote:
Thanks ..
Is there any way, apart from intuitive deduction, to
identify which information is forged, and which genuine?
Take a quick look at the headers... some (helpful) mail servers put in may be
forged headers along with the
Hello Miguel,
Thanks for showing me what should have been obvious. It
was a few days ago, but I just realized I never said Thanks.
Dan
Saturday, June 22, 2002, 3:29:48 PM, you wrote:
MAU Account/Properties/Mail Management/Mail Dispatcher/Invoke
MAU
Hello The Bat user list,
I have recently moved my installation to a Windows 2000 computer,
with TB as a secondary MUA (my personal one, rather than the work
one) and have discovered something odd:
When I write a message and hit send the message (I would think)
should move over to the
Hello Geordon,
It was foretold that on Monday, June 24, 2002 at 00:22 GMT -0500,
Geordon VanTassle [GV] would type:
GV When I write a message and hit send the message (I would think)
GV should move over to the outbox and transmit at the next interval.
GV But, it doesn't. It seems to get
33 matches
Mail list logo
