Hello MAU,
On Saturday, September 14, 2013 you wrote:
M Hello Jack,
Is there a macro to generate a thread subject?
M Try this in your reply template:
M %SUBJ=%SUBJ=%OFULLSUBJ
Thank you Miguel, that works perfectly.
--
Best Regards,
Jack LaRosa
:usflag: Central Alabama
Using The Bat!
the SET EDITOR macro is used,
regardless of which editor (1,2,3,4) is specified, the subject will always be
cleared.
Anything else you can think of to try? Is there a macro to generate a thread
subject? Should I re-install TB?
--
Best Regards,
Jack LaRosa
:usflag: Central Alabama
Using The Bat
Hello Jack,
Is there a macro to generate a thread subject?
Try this in your reply template:
%SUBJ=%SUBJ=%OFULLSUBJ
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v5.4.8
My photos at: http://www.Rancho-K.com
My photoblog: http://mau.aminus3.com
Hello Rick,
On Thursday, September 12, 2013 you wrote:
JSL Hello TBUD Listers,
JSL I just recently discovered that I could add the line %SetEditor=1 to
JSL my NEW and REPLY templates to guarantee that Plain Text would always be
used in
JSL those instances. I just noticed that when I reply to
Hallo Jack,
On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 09:16:05 -0500GMT (12-9-2013, 16:16 , where I
live), you wrote:
JSL Ok, here's the NEW template:
Nothing in your templates that should empty the subject header.
Though I'd use %SetEditor=1%- in both templates.
--
Groetjes, Roelof
Of course, you know that the
JSL Hello TBUD Listers,
JSL I just recently discovered that I could add the line %SetEditor=1 to
JSL my NEW and REPLY templates to guarantee that Plain Text would always be
used in
JSL those instances. I just noticed that when I reply to a list message, the
JSL subject line is empty when it
Hello St,
Thursday, January 24, 2013, 1:51:42 AM, you wrote:
Often ISP's anti-spam filters, both outgoing and incoming, can be a
little overzealous IME. The same can be said of desktop anti-spam
software.
SMN This is very true - but if an anti-spam filter reject messages based
SMN on the
Often ISP's anti-spam filters, both outgoing and incoming, can be a
little overzealous IME. The same can be said of desktop anti-spam
software. Your messages probably had to pass through three or more
such filters. So many pieces of phishing spam claim to be from Paypal,
that some false
Hello St,
On Wednesday, January 23, 2013 you wrote:
Often ISP's anti-spam filters, both outgoing and incoming, can be a
little overzealous IME. The same can be said of desktop anti-spam
software. Your messages probably had to pass through three or more
such filters. So many pieces of
Hi
On Wednesday 23 January 2013 at 7:00:04 PM, in
mid:1681765046.20130123130...@charter.net, Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
After I responded
to Geoff's message I sent myself a message with
PayPal in the subject line and it went through just
fine.
It's probably getting out OK but being blocked
*(?:\[[^\]]*\]\s*)?)*%-
(.*?)%-
([\(\[].+[\)\]])?$/%-
%RegExpBlindMatch=%OSubj%-
%Subject='Re: %SUBPATT=2'%-
--
Jernej Simončič http://eternallybored.org/
An ounce of image is worth a pound of performance.
-- Peter's Placebo
Current version
You can't alter the display of these subjects, but it's possible to remove the
text when replying or forwarding by using macros.
Thank you it works GREAT on replies but not on forwards for some reason
But THANK YOU VERY MUCH!!
--
Rick
Only reason can convince us of those three fundamental
R I am in some Yahoo groups. Each group ads an identifier in the
R subject, [bracketed text that can vary]
R I would like to parse out the brackets and text. Is there any way to do that?
R Thanks in advance
This was supposed to go to TBUDL - resending
--
Rick
Help bring to a close, the Age of
On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 21:00:53 +0100
Marek Mikus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Hello, too.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Current version is 3.99.27.2 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Hello Thomas,
you wrote:
TF On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 21:00:53 +0100
TF Marek Mikus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
TF Hello, too.
TF --
TF Cheers,
TF Thomas.
Hello, three.
--
Cheers,
Maurice
Current version is 3.99.27.2 | 'Using
Hello Roelof,
Tuesday, February 6, 2007, 6:00:43 PM, you wrote:
RO Options - Preferences - Message headers - Subject - Edit - Editing
Thanks for the guided tour . . . that got me to just where I
wanted to be. Your messaged is no parked/saved for prosterity.
RO It looks like your
Hi
On Tuesday 10 October 2006 at 7:49:24 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Roelof Otten wrote:
Could not connect to the server is an odd error. You tried this:
smtp.googlemail.com TLS to port 465
pop.googlemail.comTLS to port 995
smtp authentication enabled of course, but don't select
Hello MikeD!
On Tuesday, October 10, 2006, 6:35 AM, you wrote:
OK ... this is related to this thread:
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/forum/read.php?FID=4TID=2349
I have been through that one, but I am still not able to connect.
I suspect that the problem is that it is a 'hosted'
Hallo MikeD,
On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 07:35:52 -0400GMT (10-10-2006, 13:35 , where I
live), you wrote:
MI have been through that one, but I am still not able to connect.
MI suspect that the problem is that it is a 'hosted' email, that is,
Mit is not an '@gmail.com' address, but a
Hello MikeD (2) everyone else,
on 10-Okt-2006 at 13:35 you (MikeD (2)) wrote:
I suspect that the problem is that it is a 'hosted' email, that is, it
is not an '@gmail.com' address, but a different 'domain' that is being
serviced by gmail.
I have no idea what you mean with this. As far as I
Hallo MikeD,
On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 13:18:49 -0400GMT (10-10-2006, 19:18 , where I
live), you wrote:
RO You're not able to connect, is that with pop3, smtp or both?
M Both. When I try to receive or send email with TB, it goes out and
M begins the process ... after about 20 seconds I get a could
Oops. That one escaped. Sorry.
--
Best regards,
MFPA
No matter where you go, there you are.
Using The Bat! v3.80.06 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL'
Hello rich,
On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 22:01:01 -0400 GMT (15/07/2006, 09:01 +0700 GMT),
rich gregory wrote:
rg Hello Bat-Folk!
Hallo folder template!
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Reason for leaving last job: They insisted that all employees get to
work by 8:45 am every morning. I couldn't work under
Hi
On Tuesday 18 October 2005 at 9:21:48 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], MFPA wrote:
Hi
Oops!
--
Best regards,
MFPA
The truth is out there.
Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
I don't even have any signature, but I will put at least a delimiter
in the future. Not much fair to oblige people to have a signature, but
if it's the law, I'll comply... :-)
And sorry for this one (I forgot the Subject).
I'm behind a firewall, and I'm using Web2Pop to receive my mails from
Hallo Chuck,
On Thu, 4 Aug 2005 13:06:39 -0400GMT (4-8-2005, 19:06 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
CS How do you get the uptime (i.e. [uptime :: 0d 8h 29m]) in your message
templates?
Maybe this helps?
http://www.microsoft.com/ntserver/nts/downloads/management/uptime/default.asp
--
Hallo Vladimir,
On Thu, 4 Aug 2005 23:43:42 +0400GMT (4-8-2005, 21:43 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
CS How do you get the uptime (i.e. [uptime :: 0d 8h 29m]) in your message
templates?
RO Maybe this helps?
RO
http://www.microsoft.com/ntserver/nts/downloads/management/uptime/default.asp
VP
Hallo Vladimir,
On Fri, 5 Aug 2005 00:42:53 +0400GMT (4-8-2005, 22:42 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
VP :) There is macro plugin called uptime. I just formatted it's
VP output...
RO And where would one find that plug-in?
VP I have no www link, but I have a FIDO address of
Hallo Vladimir,
On Fri, 5 Aug 2005 01:14:27 +0400GMT (4-8-2005, 23:14 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
VP http://rapidshare.de/files/3658285/uptime03.rar.html
It works
VP I don't know, how long it would be available, but...
According to the faq it'll be dumped when it isn't downloaded for 30
Hello rich,
On 24 March 2005 at 11:06:24 GMT -0500 (which was 17:06:24 where I
live), rich gregory wrote and made these valuable points on the
subject of Morphing subject selective filter:
Hello Bat-Folk!
Using TB! v2.12.00...
Since the filter interface will not let me selectively delete
Hello rich gregory everyone else,
on 24-Mrz-2005 at 17:06 you (rich gregory) wrote:
Sometimes the word wicked is fudged, sometimes other parts of the
subject, but the phraseology is the same always.
Get K9 from http://www.keir.net or any other Bayes filter based spam filter
(K9 is very lean
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Thu, 24 Mar 2005,
@ @ at 11:06:24 -0500, when rich gregory wrote:
Hello Bat-Folk!
Hello Bat-Individual!
Using TB! v2.12.00...
Glad to meet you, a User of a noble taste and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Thu, 24 Mar 2005,
@ @ at 11:06:24 -0500, when rich gregory wrote:
Random tagline:
If women didnt exist; all the money in the world would have no
meaning. - Aristotle Onassis
Hi
On Friday 18 February 2005 at 8:54:23 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], David Calvarese
wrote:
My only real issue with buying it is that I need to use it on 2
PCs. my work PC (for personal email) and my home PC (for the
same). But I'm only ever going to be signing on one at a time.
As far as
Hi
On Friday 18 February 2005 at 8:02:16 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Alexander S. Kunz
wrote:
Let's see how it behaves regarding the sig delimiter.
I think you would have to inline sign, not PGP/MIME for the sig
delimiter to be affected.
Much better if you ask me, because its PGP/MIME
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi David,
on Fri, 18 Feb 2005 13:54:20 -0500GMT, you wrote:
DC I've got a little problem... Using TB! along with GnuPG, it messes
DC up my sig delimter so that it's only -- instead of --space. Any
DC way to fix that?
Not that I know of.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 20:14:40 +0100GMT (18-2-2005, 20:14 +0100, where I
live), Peter Meyns wrote:
PM on Fri, 18 Feb 2005 13:54:20 -0500GMT, you wrote:
DC I've got a little problem... Using TB! along with GnuPG, it messes
DC up my sig delimter
Hi David,
on Fri, 18 Feb 2005 14:31:58 -0500GMT, you wrote:
DC I've got a little problem... Using TB! along with GnuPG, it messes
DC up my sig delimter so that it's only -- instead of --space. Any
DC way to fix that?
PM Not that I know of. TB! recognizes sig delimiters defected by its
Hello Peter Meyns everyone else,
on 18-Feb-2005 at 20:47 you (Peter Meyns) wrote:
Let's see how it behaves regarding the sig delimiter.
Much better if you ask me, because its PGP/MIME instead of inline signing,
and the sig delimiter is also totally normal. :-)
--
Best regards,
Alexander
Hi David Calvarese,
On 18/02/2005 03:11 PM, you wrote:
I suppose I'll have to up and buy it then. I was hoping to avoid
having to do that.Ummm... What exactly does it do different
anyway?
TB! can generate PGP/MIME signatures using GnuPG. You don't need to get
PGP v8 for that.
Hello David Calvarese everyone else,
on 18-Feb-2005 at 20:31 you (David Calvarese) wrote:
Hrm... Would PGP V8 be any better for that? I wouldn't object to
buying it if I had to.
Buy? Do you need to use it commercially? If not:
http://www.pgp.com/downloads/freeware/index.html
--
Best
Hello Quin,
Thursday, December 23, 2004, 11:06:38 AM, you wrote:
Hello TBUDL,
I want to archive certain NYTimes articles but I'd really like to
change the Subject line to make the articles easily accessible. I
know I need to export messages using some format, change the Subject
On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 11:06:38 -0700, Quin Selman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know I need to export messages using some format, change the Subject
header somehow, and import back into TB!
somehow.
That's exactly what I do sometimes. I export the message into some
temporary folder, open it
Hello Quin,
Thursday, December 23, 2004, 11:06:38 AM, you wrote:
Q I want to archive certain NYTimes articles but I'd really like to
Q change the Subject line to make the articles easily accessible. I
Q know I need to export messages using some format, change the
Q Subject header somehow, and
ON Thursday, December 23, 2004, 7:06:38 PM, you wrote:
QS Hello TBUDL,
QS I want to archive certain NYTimes articles but I'd really like to
QS change the Subject line to make the articles easily accessible. I
QS know I need to export messages using some format, change the Subject
QS
Hello Bill,
A reminder of what Bill McQuillan on TBUDL typed on:
17 December 2004 at 07:04:17 GMT +0100
BM My recommendation is to uncheck Use reply numbering in the subject line
in all reply templates.
%SINGLERE
In address book templates.
--
Best regards,Tony.
/. ;-)
And Re[5]: Subject is *so* much more elegant than
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Subject, or even
Re: Re[2]: ...
--
Best regards,
MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
On Thu, 2004-12-16, Greg Strong wrote:
Hello TB Lists,
Just thought I'd let those of you who use counters in your subject with
a reply (i.e. Re[2]: GnuPG 1.4.0) that it messes up the threading in my
newsreader (i.e. Agent 1.93) when I pull from Gmane. Not that you really
care about my
Hello Ralph,
Tuesday, November 16, 2004, 10:19:08 AM, you wrote:
Hello,
Hi there :)
Sean
--
Sean Rima [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: 679813 YAHOO: thecivvie
Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] AIM: tcobone
O2 +353863868343 Vodafone +353872628431
Having only one spouse is called monotony.
Hæ!
Monday, October 18, 2004, 14:31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
POPFile amedns the subject with a word such as [spam] prepended.
Why not disable this option in Popfile and filter instead on
X-Text-Classification: spam
in the header?
You can edit the option in Popfile in the buckets area.
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Mon, 18 Oct 2004,
@ @ at 13:31:20 +0100, when [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
POPFile amedns the subject with a word such as [spam] prepended.
I find the email is not spam and teach
On Mon 18 October 2004, 22:31:20 +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to be able to edit the subject of the email to remove the
[spam] prependation (ohh I like that word!).
If I go to the mailbox and open it in a text editor I don'r seem to be
able to achieve the effect desired.
Any
On Mon 18 October 2004, 23:37:56 +1000, Mica Mijatovic wrote:
You can edit headers, including the
subject field, only if you save a message to disk, and then edit it
using some text editor - and then importing the message again in TB.
But, the receiving time will not be original one any more
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Mon, 18 Oct 2004,
@ @ at 23:45:11 +1000, when Robin Anson wrote:
On Mon 18 October 2004, 23:37:56 +1000, Mica Mijatovic wrote:
You can edit headers, including the
subject field,
Hello admin,
old message...
aacu POPFile amedns the subject with a word such as [spam] prepended.
aacu I find the email is not spam and teach POPFile acordingly but then I
aacu want to store that email in the correct folder.
aacu If I re-filter the folder for other reasons then the [spam] email
On Mon 18 October 2004, 23:47:17 +1000, Tbudl wrote:
Just drag the message to the OUTBOX and then open the mail and edit it :-)
Changes the date and time on it - no good if those are important.
--
Robin
Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
On Wednesday, September 01, 2004, Doug Weller wrote...
I tried out the 3 beta and saw the tick box in Account
properties, but I'm pretty sure it wasn't there always, and it isn't
in my 3 final. Now you see it now you don't? How do I get NFS in
version 3?
The NFS is no longer optional as it
Hello Doug,
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
DW How do I get NFS in version 3?
The filters are NFS. You now have no option and so far they seem to be
working better than in version 2 or maybe I'm lucky.
--
Regards,
Richard
| Using The Bat! 3.0 SpamPal
| Windows XP
Hello Doug,
I tried out the 3 beta and saw the tick box in Account properties, but I'm pretty
sure
it wasn't there always, and it isn't in my 3 final. Now you see it now you don't?
How do
I get NFS in version 3?
Just open the Sorting Office. NFS is the only option in v3.0.
--
Best
How do I get NFS in version 3?
NFS? What's that?
--
Marten Gallagher
Annery Kiln Web Design
www.annerykiln.co.uk
Using The Bat! 3.0
with POPFile 0.21.1
on Windows XP 5.1
Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
On Wednesday, September 01, 2004, Doug Weller wrote...
I tried out the 3 beta and saw the tick box in Account
properties, but I'm pretty sure it wasn't there always, and it
isn't in my 3 final. Now you see it now you don't? How do I get
NFS in version 3?
The NFS is no longer
Hi pk,
On 8/3/2004 7:59 AM my time, pk wrote:
pr have been sending cc to one of my other accounts in other location
pr using thebat v2.12,
Is the receiving e-mail program V2.12 or just the one your sending it
from?
--
Darrin
WinXP Home Service Pack 1
Tbat! 2.12.00
On a clear disk you can seek
Hello Mike,
Thursday, July 29, 2004, 10:02:41 AM, you wrote:
I can't seem to get IMAP emails to be deleted off the IMAP server. Is
there an account feature I have missed that lets me do this??
Try:
Folder / Purge+Compress
--
Dave
Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service
Hello Allie,
Wednesday, July 14, 2004, 5:01:48 PM, you wrote:
A Rich Gregory, [RG] wrote:
RG OT: I may like the term hijacking, but I LOVE the phrase 'trout
RG not accepted'!
A ;)
:gdr: duck cover yow!
--
Maggie
Hallo M.Laue,
On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 09:57:45 +0200GMT (10-7-2004, 9:57 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
ML I just installed BayesIT plugin. Since yesterday the Bat
ML gives me the following error message as
ML soon as I try to declare a message as Spam:
Reinstall the plug-in
If that doesn't help
==Original message text===
From: M.Laue [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TheBat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Saturday, July 10, 2004, 9:57:45 AM
Subject: (no subject)
ML Hi !
ML I just installed BayesIT plugin. Since yesterday the Bat gives me the following
error message as
ML soon as I
Dear Michael,
@9-Jul-2004, 08:49 -0700 (09-Jul 16:49 UK time) Michael L. Wilson
said to The:
... snip
Any ideas or better ways to clean the subject line would be
appreciated.
Here's what I use:
,--/ New version of subject cleaner \--
%___%REM=clean subject - by daniel
On Fri 9-Jul-04 10:49am -0400, Michael L. Wilson wrote:
I am using the QT FIXSUBJ from the silverstones library. I repeat it
for clarification:
More often than not, these days, it simply reduces my subject to RE:
with nothing else. I did not modify this at all. Any ideas or better
ways
On Thu 1 July 2004, 15:06:20 +1000, Jan Rifkinson wrote:
[new msg IDT template]
,
Was that an oops I didn't mean to send that moment? :)
--
Robin Anson
Using The Bat! v2.11.02 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
Current version is
Hello Marck,
Saturday, May 29, 2004, 11:16:00 AM, you wrote:
MDP Now, where did I put that trout?
http://www.aaofla.com/webpages/halloffame/fame1/trout-7.jpg
There! And I can see why you forgot about the fish! :-)
--
Best Wishes,
Mark
using The Bat! 2.11 Beta/8
Hello Melissa,
Saturday, May 29, 2004, 10:24:01 PM, you wrote:
MR In addition to what others here have said about this, I do find it
MR ironic that you're complaining about TB!'s handling of URLs when your
MR own email client has wrapped the long URL you posted here. In order to
MR even use it
Hallo Anne,
On Mon, 17 May 2004 00:20:47 +0100GMT (17-5-04, 1:20 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
A Just wondering if it's possible to filter on a blank subject
A line? If so, what would I need to put in as the filter string?
Sure.
Filter string would be something:
Subject:\s*\n
Location:
On Monday, May 17, 2004, 12:52:34 AM, Roelof wrote in message:
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
R Sure.
Brilliant! Thanks Roelof, that worked just fine. :)
--
Cheers,
Anne Registered Linux user #345132
Flying high with The Bat! v2.04.7 on Xandros Desktop 2.0 - Linux
Visit The
Hello Leif,
Monday, March 15, 2004, 10:43:40 PM, you wrote:
LG mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
LG or (but sometimes problematic):
LG mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks! It was the questionmark I was omited.
--
Best Wishes,
Mark
using The Bat! 2.04.7
Hello Peter,
Monday, March 15, 2004, 11:04:42 PM, you wrote:
PM mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]'t
Thanks to you too!
--
Best Wishes,
Mark
using The Bat! 2.04.7
Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
Hello ken,
Friday, February 20, 2004, 11:16:51 AM, you wrote:
kg Do the mods have a moderator template for proper subject line
kg posting? With all the reminders I've seen, it seems like something
kg to encourage people to put relevant info in the subject lines
kg would be a good idea.
No, we
Leif Gregory wrote:
Personally, I feel
people should be responsible enough to put in meaningful subject lines
and moderating those just adds one more restriction we are imposing on
the list.
You could say the exact same thing for every single moderator
intervention that exists now
Hello ken,
Friday, February 20, 2004, 11:53:43 AM, you wrote:
kg You could say the exact same thing for every single moderator
kg intervention that exists now (top-posting, cut lines, etc.)
You could if a single immutable fact wasn't true. Because of our
current intervention, the TB lists are,
Leif Gregory wrote:
Friday, February 20, 2004, 11:53:43 AM, you wrote:
kg You could say the exact same thing for every single moderator
kg intervention that exists now (top-posting, cut lines, etc.)
You could if a single immutable fact wasn't true. Because of our
current intervention, the TB
Hello ken,
Friday, February 20, 2004, 2:58:20 PM, you wrote:
kg Perhaps. Or TheBat! as a product tends to attract users that are a
kg bit more mature and level-headed. I suspect it's a combination of
kg many things. But I do agree that the TB lists are among the most
kg civil and helpful I've
Leif Gregory wrote:
It's immutable if I say so, because as my girlfriend always says It's
always about you isn't it! grin
Yeah, I bet you're high-maintenance... (as am I - I bet your girlfriend
and my wife could talk for days)
kg So you are saying that we've seen the last new moderator
Hello ken,
Friday, February 20, 2004, 4:06:22 PM, you wrote:
kg Yeah, I bet you're high-maintenance... (as am I - I bet your
kg girlfriend and my wife could talk for days)
Yep, that's me!! High maintenance. grin
kg Very funny. Marck's post almost had me spit water onto the
kg keyboard. It
On Sun 4 January 2004, 1:37:39 +1000, Cs4l wrote:
Actually, this would not solve my issue.
SpamPal would modify the headers instead of the subject, and I would
want to remove the modified header so it it does not get picked by the
filters. In that case I'd need a script to remove the header
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
On 03 January 2004, 09:57 +0100 (03/01/2004 08:57 local time) cs4l [C]
in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
C Don't interpret what I write negatively, I'm very happy with SpamPal!
C Nevertheless, my spampal sometimes mis-identifies messages
* cs4l [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Nevertheless, my spampal sometimes mis-identifies messages as spam
and includes markers in the subject line of the received message.
How can I get rid of the added marker in the Bat
This is not possible without exporting, editing and reimporting of
Hello Martin,
Saturday, January 3, 2004, 10:56:33 AM, you wrote:
MW I've stopped using SpamPal but did use it a few months ago. I never had
MW these headers because I configured SpamPal not to show them; I used the
MW headers instead. Checkout SpamPal options etc.
Actually, this would not solve
ON Saturday, January 3, 2004, 3:37:39 PM, you wrote:
c Actually, this would not solve my issue.
c SpamPal would modify the headers instead of the subject, and I would
c want to remove the modified header so it it does not get picked by the
c filters. In that case I'd need a script to remove the
Hallo The.Limit,
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 10:20:02 -0800GMT (15-12-03, 19:20 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
TL unsubscribe upwada [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Folder template?
--
Groetjes, Roelof
Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information:
Hallo Lynn,
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 11:42:09 -0800GMT (15-12-03, 20:42 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
RO Folder template?
TL Following unsub instructions ... sigh
With the focus (in TB) on your tbudl folder, I presume.
TL I wonder if it worked??? lol!
Depends on your folder template.
If it
Hi Lynn,
@15-Dec-2003, 11:42 -0800 (15-Dec 19:42 UK time) The.Limit said to
Roelof:
RO Folder template?
Following unsub instructions ... sigh
I wonder if it worked??? lol!
Doubtful. The listserver doesn't read commands sent to the list. You
have to send them not to TBUDL@ but to [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
ON Thursday, November 6, 2003, 11:40:28 PM, you wrote:
MDP It's not an option. It would be something that Steve has composed
MDP for himself in a template using macros.
Marck,
Ok, then I understand what is happening.
Sorry for the sloppy PGP
Hi Steve,
@7-Nov-2003, 07:51 +1100 (06-Nov 20:51 UK time) Steve Mullarkey
said:
I am losing the 'Subject' in New Messages. Here are my symptoms :-
... snip
3. The Subject line changes to I forgot to put in the subject
line.
... snip
Is this some new feature ?
No, it's a new way of
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
boundary===-==-==-=---=--==--==-=-=--=-=-=--=;
protocol=application/pgp-signature; micalg=pgp-sha1
--==-==-==-=---=--==--==-=-=--=-=-=--=
ON Thursday, November 6, 2003, 10:33:47 PM, you wrote:
MDP You will have to
Hi Gerard,
@6-Nov-2003, 23:08 +0100 (06-Nov 22:08 UK time) Gerard said to
Marck:
MDP You will have to sacrifice your intelligent subject management.
MDP Every time you move from the header editing to the body editing and
MDP the body is unmodified, the template is re-evaluated. This is
MDP
Hello Louis,
Friday, October 17, 2003, 12:53:25 PM, you wrote:
L Hello TBUDL,
Just a test and a mistake. :)
--
Best regards,
Louismailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current version is 2.01 | Using TBUDL information:
Hello all,
Monday, September 1, 2003, Scott Derrick wrote:
Any news on 2.0, like new feature list and when it will be released?
AFAIK it will be released today, You should wait some hours :-)
--
Bye
Marek Mikus
Czech support of The Bat!
http://www.thebat.cz
Using the best The Bat! 2.0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday, August 31, 2003, Marek Mikus wrote...
Any news on 2.0, like new feature list and when it will be released?
AFAIK it will be released today, You should wait some hours :-)
I _really_ hope they postpone that release :/ Or they've not
disappears.
MLW Does anyone have an idea or a fix for this macro? Here is the
MLW macro
Yes - the wrapping is shot to pieces. Here it is in correct format:
%SUBJECT=Re: %SETPATTREGEXP='(?i)\A(?::?\s*)%-
(?:(?:\s*(?:fwd|re|aw|fw|antwort|wg|forw)%-
(?:\[\d*\])?:\s*)|(?:\s*\[.*\]\s*))*%-
(.*?)(?:(?:\s
The subject disappears.
MLW Does anyone have an idea or a fix for this macro? Here is the macro
MLW Quick Template 5.Description : Fixup a messy Re: subject
MLW Handle : FIXSUBJ
MLW %SUBJECT=Re:%SETPATTREGEXP='(?i)\A(?::?\s*)%-
(?:(?:\s*(?:fwd|re|aw|fw|antwort|wg|forw)%- (?:\[\d*\])?:\s*)|(?:\s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Homesick,
@23-Jan-2003, 23:41 +0100 (22:41 UK time) Homesick Mac [HM] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
HM DIGEST [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This looks a) like an old style instruction (for the old sever)
sent to b) the
1 - 100 of 362 matches
Mail list logo
