Hi Richard,
on Fri, 29 Dec 2006 07:57:57 -0500GMT (29.12.2006, 13:57 +0100GMT here),
you wrote:
RHS Greetings,
RHS I've been using the latest release (3.95.6) for several days now, and
RHS all of a sudden my BayesIt has gone missing.
Here is what Maxim Masiutin wrote about this topic on
Hello Richard,
Friday, December 29, 2006, 7:57:57 AM, you wrote:
RHS -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
RHS Hash: SHA256
RHS Greetings,
RHS I've been using the latest release (3.95.6) for several days now, and
RHS all of a sudden my BayesIt has gone missing. I can't swear it was
RHS there when
Hello Peter,
Friday, December 29, 2006, 8:41:57 AM, you wrote:
PM Hi Richard,
PM on Fri, 29 Dec 2006 07:57:57 -0500GMT (29.12.2006, 13:57 +0100GMT here),
PM you wrote:
RHS Greetings,
RHS I've been using the latest release (3.95.6) for several days now, and
RHS all of a sudden my BayesIt has
Hallo Richard,
On Fri, 29 Dec 2006 07:57:57 -0500GMT (29-12-2006, 13:57 , where I
live), you wrote:
RHS I've been using the latest release (3.95.6) for several days now, and
RHS all of a sudden my BayesIt has gone missing. I can't swear it was
RHS there when I installed the latest version,
The
Hello Maxim,
Friday, December 29, 2006, 9:25:04 AM, you wrote:
MM Hello Gene,
MM Friday, December 29, 2006, 15:53:07, you wrote:
Yes, the installation of (3.95.6) seems to delete all files associated
with BayesIt except bayeslogger.exe.
MM No, it only deletes the program files of BayesIt, not
Hello Gene,
Friday, December 29, 2006, 4:33:30 PM, you wrote:
G Upon installation I am prompted that, Unregistered version of product
G includes TMAgent software that displays advertisements when you search
G Web. To disable the advertisements, please buy license and activate
G your copy.
G
Dear Gene,
Upon installation I am prompted that, Unregistered version of product
includes TMAgent software that displays advertisements when you search
Web. To disable the advertisements, please buy license and activate
your copy.
In fact I registered my copy AGAVA and tmasrv.exe is still
Hello Maxim,
Friday, December 29, 2006, 11:15:59 AM, you wrote:
I started looking on Ritlabs.com and found that no
anti-spam software was really current...
MM
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/products/thebat/plugin/detail.php?ID=1463phrase_id=35322
No updates since August 28, 2005?
MM
Hello Gene,
Friday, December 29, 2006, 4:55:45 PM, you wrote:
AntispamSniper looks like a viable product! I'm trying it now
I have been using this for some months now, and have found it very
good. After training for a couple of days, I only very rarely get a good
email labelled as spam
Hello Graham,
Friday, December 29, 2006, 12:06:52 PM, you wrote:
GS Hello Gene,
GS Friday, December 29, 2006, 4:55:45 PM, you wrote:
AntispamSniper looks like a viable product! I'm trying it now
GS I have been using this for some months now, and have found it very
GS good. After
Hello Akebono,
Friday, December 29, 2006, 11:18:51 AM, you wrote:
ATS Dear Gene,
Upon installation I am prompted that, Unregistered version of product
includes TMAgent software that displays advertisements when you search
Web. To disable the advertisements, please buy license and activate
Hello Mark,
Friday, December 29, 2006, 10:47:34 AM, you wrote:
MP Hello Gene,
MP Friday, December 29, 2006, 4:33:30 PM, you wrote:
G Upon installation I am prompted that, Unregistered version of product
G includes TMAgent software that displays advertisements when you search
G Web. To disable
Friday, December 29, 2006, Gene wrote:
SpamPal If you think I do poor German, then imagine what a mess
I am with *anything* using the Cyrillic alphabet
Hopefully, the world is a nice place and the Russian page should be
roughly equivalent to the official TB-info from SpamPal
Hello Urban,
Friday, December 29, 2006, 12:49:40 PM, you wrote:
U Friday, December 29, 2006, Gene wrote:
SpamPal If you think I do poor German, then imagine what a mess
I am with *anything* using the Cyrillic alphabet
U Hopefully, the world is a nice place and the Russian page
Hi Gene,
Friday, December 29, 2006, 4:55:45 PM, you wrote:
AntispamSniper looks like a viable product! I'm trying it now
I've used AntispamSniper for quite a few months now and my experience
has been quite good. Looking at my stats, I've received 33454 messages
and the error rate is 1.55%,
Hi Gene,
on Fri, 29 Dec 2006 11:55:45 -0500GMT (29.12.2006, 17:55 +0100GMT here),
you wrote:
G K9 No updates since April 18, 2004?
So what? It works very well. I only replaced it by AntiSpamSniper
(free version) because I preferred a plugin to an extra application
working as a proxy.
Hello Richard H. Stoddard everyone else,
on 29-Dez-2006 at 20:19 you (Richard H. Stoddard) wrote:
K9 has proved to be remarkably accurate (99.6% typically, with only a
false positive every few months)
Are you sure it is a false positive, ie. a legitimate message being
falsely classified as
Hello Peter Meyns everyone else,
on 29-Dez-2006 at 20:53 you (Peter Meyns) wrote:
G K9 No updates since April 18, 2004?
So what? It works very well.
I just wanted to say the same. ;-)
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de)
You cannot kill time without injuring eternity. --
Hello Alexander,
Friday, December 29, 2006, 4:31:31 PM, you wrote:
ASK Hello Peter Meyns everyone else,
ASK on 29-Dez-2006 at 20:53 you (Peter Meyns) wrote:
G K9 No updates since April 18, 2004?
So what? It works very well.
ASK I just wanted to say the same. ;-)
I guess it would be
Hello all,
Thursday, July 13, 2006, Bill McCarthy wrote:
I had been using Bayesit! for a few years with fairly good
success on my laptop. About two months ago, my laptop
developed a hardware problem and I switched to my wife's
desktop (XP Pro SP2).
I have been training Bayesit! from
I have been training Bayesit! from scratch and have had it
catch nothing :-(
Turning on logging, I discovered that Bayesit! appeared a
bit confused.
That was just a few days ago and Bayesit! has still not
found any spam (I guess training is just starting now).
I tried BayesIT again
On Thu 13-Jul-06 2:33pm -0600, Marten Gallagher wrote:
I tried BayesIT again recently and found it getting things totally wrong -
it ended up 'refusing' to classify anything in one email account.
After taking advice from this list a while back - I am now using K9 with
absolutely wonderfully,
Hallo Max,
On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 02:59:04 + (UTC)GMT (12-2-2006, 3:59 +0100,
where I live), you wrote:
M I should have been clearer in my original message. The problem is that these
M notices do not go away. They occur everytime I start The Bat!. I've followed
M their instructions and
Roelof Otten [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Did you configure BayesIt properly? (Told it where to find its files?)
That was the problem. It seems that when you tell the installer to move the MAIL
directory elsewhere, Bayesit will still think its configuration information is
in the default MAIL
Hallo Max,
On Sat, 11 Feb 2006 12:13:39 + (UTC)GMT (11-2-2006, 13:13 +0100,
where I live), you wrote:
M The first says: It seems that you use encrypted The Bat! Please, provide the
M minimal value from Move to junk folder and delete letter (see
Preferences
M Antispam menu in The Bat!)
Roelof Otten [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, it's correct about you using an encrypted message base, so just
do what it tells you to do. I can remember having to do the same when
I started with OTFE, back then I was still using BayesIt.
I should have been clearer in my original message. The
Hallo Steve,
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 06:43:25 -0700GMT (30-8-2005, 15:43 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
ST This may sound like a really dumb question, but I downloaded the rar
ST for the BayseIt plug in, and expanded it. How do I install it?
Extract them to a random directory (doesn't matter
Hallo Pat,
On Sat, 20 Aug 2005 11:30:33 -0500GMT (20-8-2005, 18:30 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
PJ I recently reinstalled TB! and wanted to try the spam plugin, Bayesit.
PJ This program is not working well at all; I trained it with over
PJ 3,000 spam messages, yet these are still routinely
Hello Pat,
On Sat, 20 Aug 2005 11:30:33 -0500GMT P.Johnson wrote:
PJ I recently reinstalled TB! and wanted to try the spam plugin, Bayesit.
PJ This program is not working well at all; I trained it with over
PJ 3,000 spam messages, yet these are still routinely delivered into my
PJ inbox with
Hello Barry!
On Friday, July 08, 2005, 2:36 AM, you wrote:
Just wondered if anyone else had experienced similar problems with
build 30?
It's a known bug in the .msi which wrapped .30. We've been testing
RL's fix on TBBETA--as v. 3.51--and when it's certain that no new bug
crept in while
Hello Barry,
Friday, July 8, 2005, 2:36:40 AM, you wrote:
B Hi
B I just downloaded build 30 from the Ritlabs web site and installed over my
B copy of build 25 and Bayesit 0.8.1
B For some reason the installer removed my copy of Bayesit but didn't replace
B it. I tried installing a downloaded
Hello Barry,
B I just downloaded build 30 from the Ritlabs web site and installed over my
B copy of build 25 and Bayesit 0.8.1
B For some reason the installer removed my copy of Bayesit but didn't replace
B it. I tried installing a downloaded copy of Bayesit but its only 0.8.0 and
B when I tried
ON Thursday, May 26, 2005, 10:08:08 AM, you wrote:
B Copy and Paste the following REGEX expressions into the Bayesit
B blacklist.txt file in your BayesIt folder. You'll find the list below my
Hi Barry,
Don't you mean the filters.txt file ?
--
Best regards,
Gerard
On Thu, 26 May 2005 13:17:24 +0200, Gerard wrote:
ON Thursday, May 26, 2005, 10:08:08 AM, you wrote:
B Copy and Paste the following REGEX expressions into the Bayesit
B blacklist.txt file in your BayesIt folder. You'll find the list below my
Hi Barry,
Don't you mean the filters.txt file
ON Thursday, May 26, 2005, 1:36:47 PM, you wrote:
B On Thu, 26 May 2005 13:17:24 +0200, Gerard wrote:
ON Thursday, May 26, 2005, 10:08:08 AM, you wrote:
B Copy and Paste the following REGEX expressions into the Bayesit
B blacklist.txt file in your BayesIt folder. You'll find the list below my
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Jeff,
On Thu, 26 May 2005 13:11:05 +0100 (8:11 AM here), Jeff Gaines [JG]
wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
JG I switched to BayesFilter and I'm training it. For some reason TB!
JG is not retaining this add in between sessions, I have to keep
JG
JG I'm still struggling a bit with this plugin (v 0.8.1).
JG It seems to regard everything as spam except this list, which I've
JG managed to whitelist. It's a pain because I am selling my first item
JG on eBay and I'm getting some questions. Instead of going through my
JG inbox and deleting junk
Hello Jeff,
Tuesday, May 24, 2005, 7:04:30 PM, you wrote:
JG Hello Group
JG I'm still struggling a bit with this plugin (v 0.8.1).
JG It seems to regard everything as spam except this list, which I've
JG managed to whitelist. It's a pain because I am selling my first item
JG on eBay and I'm
Hello Alexander,
On Thursday, April 21, 2005, you wrote:
It's slow during mail retrieval, which is OK because it's doing lots
of thinking (pathetic fallacy?)
ASK K9 does the same thinking and its blazingly fast
OK - sold. Thanks for the advice, K9's installed and doing a pretty
good job as
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 01:11:08 +0200, Robin Anson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What version of Popfile are you using? I have been using it for some
years now, and have never noticed it slowing - what is it that you see
happening?
PopFile itself is achingly slow. :-}
--
Gruesse / Greetings,
Alexander
Hello Robin,
On Thursday, April 21, 2005, you wrote:
RA What version of Popfile are you using?
I'm on the latest - v0.22.2.
RA I have been using it for some years now, and have never noticed it
RA slowing - what is it that you see happening?
It's slow during mail retrieval, which is OK because
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 09:57:53 +0200, Nick Dutton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's slow during mail retrieval, which is OK because it's doing lots
of thinking (pathetic fallacy?)
K9 does the same thinking and its blazingly fast during mail retrieval
(hardly noticable there's anything in-between TB
Hi
On Wednesday 20 April 2005 at 7:54:21 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Philip Storry
wrote:
Because of those blank emails, I added the Bayes Filter Plugin as a
second plugin. You can find that here: http://www.lkcc.org/achim
It's good, and I chose it because unlike BayesIt (as far as I
Thursday, April 21, 2005, MFPA wrote:
RBL lookups?
http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/R/RBL.html
--
Urban
It would be terrible if the Red Cross Bloodmobile got into an accident.
No, wait. That would be good because if anyone needed it, the blood
would be right there
Hi
On Thursday 21 April 2005 at 2:56:10 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Urban wrote:
RBL lookups?
http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/R/RBL.html
Thanks
--
Best regards,
MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack
Hello Nick Dutton
On Wednesday, April 20, 2005, 10:58:37 AM +0400 GMT
You wrote:
ND Hello,
ND I'm going through one of my irregular explorations of anti-SPAM
ND technology, as popfile just seems to grind slower and slower. Although
ND it must be said that it's almost perfect in terms of
Hello Nick,
Wednesday, April 20, 2005, 3:58:37 PM, you wrote:
ND Aside from the fact that mails are put into a spam folder by
ND bayesit, I can't find any other sign in the message. Is this so?
As far as I can tell, TB doesn't mark the message at all - which I
personally find quite
Hello Nick Dutton everyone else,
on 20-Apr-2005 at 16:58 you (Nick Dutton) wrote:
Aside from the fact that mails are put into a spam folder by bayesit,
I can't find any other sign in the message. Is this so?
Exactly.
If you're only using PopFile for spam filtering, may I suggest to have a
On Thu 21 April 2005, 0:58:37 +1000, Nick Dutton wrote:
I'm going through one of my irregular explorations of anti-SPAM
technology, as popfile just seems to grind slower and slower. Although
it must be said that it's almost perfect in terms of accuracy.
What version of Popfile are you using? I
Hello MikeD,
Thursday, March 31, 2005, 10:29:35 AM, you wrote:
M3 [...] When I first started having this problem, I not only
M3 'un-installed' the add-in, I deleted the all the training
M3 data and retrained. That did not stop the problem from
M3 reoccurring either.
I did this and it worked. I
Hello MikeD,
Thursday, March 31, 2005, 3:53:54 AM, you wrote:
M3 Hmm ... I have nothing else to suggest at this point. But you
M3 might want to look at the Doesn't download Mail thread and
M3 see if that has any applicability.
I tried that. There are no new messages with malformed headers.
The
Hello MikeD,
Tuesday, March 29, 2005, 11:49:39 AM, you wrote:
M3 Occasionally, that won't work and I have to do one extra
M3 step. After I have deleted BayesIt, I have to connect and get
M3 mail once. After that I can re-add BayesIt and it will work
M3 fine for a while again.
It works this way
Hello MikeD,
Wednesday, March 30, 2005, 5:08:46 AM, you wrote:
M3 I would be interested in hearing what (if anything) you find out.
It seems to be 2 accounts (rest OK) and the problem is
consistent, ie the mail is blocked every time. Also the Connection
Center locks up evry time so I have to
Hello Scott,
Tuesday, March 29, 2005, 12:02:41 PM, you wrote:
SF Hello TBUDL,
SF I just clean installed everything, and imported my installation
SF from a backup, but now BayesIt is giving me trouble.
SF Sometimes all my messages will download but not be imported,
SF then the connection
ON Friday, November 19, 2004, 11:46:17 PM, you wrote:
NL But I now have a spambase of over 4000
NL messages to work off of.
Hi Neal,
I only have 450 to work with sofar, but I would not like to trade with you :-)
I agree that BasesIt filter does a good job.
My settings are similar to yours.
--
Hello John,
Friday, November 19, 2004, 9:02:30 PM, you wrote:
Hello Chris,
Why does the Bayesit plugin not work very well?
It will pick up an occasional spam but misses most.
It will still fall for the same messages even after I mark them as
spam.
I have started to notice
Hello John,
Friday, November 19, 2004, 4:02:30 PM, you wrote:
JM Why does the Bayesit plugin not work very well?
JM It will pick up an occasional spam but misses most.
JM It will still fall for the same messages even after I mark them as
JM spam.
JM
Spammers have gotten hip to how
Hi John and Group,
Why does the Bayesit plugin not work very well?
It will pick up an occasional spam but misses most.
It will still fall for the same messages even after I mark them as
spam.
I have have really good luck with Bayesit no that it and TBv3 are
stable. My Out of 100
At 12:24 [GMT+0200] on Wednesday November 3 (actual time - 6:24pm on Wednesday
in Perth, Western Australia), you wrote:
[snips]
Dave How do you install this Bayesit filter?
I did it by downloading and installing Spampal :-)
After a fair bit of testing, I find it's better than any of the
Hello Dave,
Wednesday, November 3, 2004, 5:24:51 AM, you wrote:
DT How do you install this Bayesit filter?
First unarchive the TBP file someplace in either the TB executable
tree or the data tree. I put mine in Prg_files/TheBat/Bayesit
Go to Options / PLugins.
Click add and then point at the
Hello Dave,
Tuesday, November 2, 2004, 6:31:10 AM, you wrote:
DT Where do I find the link to the latest version
Sorry, I no longer have that link handy and I cannot read the site
well enough to find the link sigh
Hopefully someone else will be able to post a copy of the link for
you.
--
Best
Tue, 2 Nov 2004 13:31:10 +0200 (6:31 AM EST here) Dave Thomas wrote:
Where do I find the link to the latest [Bayesit] version
You might want to try
www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/bayesit/bayesit.lng .
Using: The Bat! v2.12.00, BayesIt! 0.5.9,
MyMacros 1.11, gMacrosPlugin 0.80
Hello G.,
Tuesday, October 19, 2004, 9:24:45 AM, you wrote:
GM I'm sure this is a FAQ but I haven't been paying attention...
GM Just upgraded to TB 3.01, no problems, but BayesIt has
GM stopped spotting ANY spam - not that it ever was any good at it
GM (about 1 in 3 with 2.x). Do I have to
Hello Michael,
Friday, October 15, 2004, 11:49:11 PM, you wrote:
MLW -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
MLW Hash: SHA1
MLW Hi,
MLW I get some pretty rude email spam. I have setup a filter to delete
MLW from the server anything with certain words in the subject. Many of
MLW these still get
On Saturday, 16 October 2004 at 18:56 (UK time), Roman Katzer said:
Is there a way to see what score BayesIt gave a message?
Just upgraded to 3.0.1.33 and use BayesIt for the forst time (dodn#t work
before).
Check the 'Filter' lines of the Account Log. Not the best way but as far
as I know,
On Saturday, October 16, 2004, 14:36:57, Paul White wrote:
Check the 'Filter' lines of the Account Log. Not the best way but as far
as I know, the only way.
Thanks, I'll try that and promise to proof-read my messages in the future
:)
Roman
--
Foreign Aid - taxing poor people in rich
Hello MikeD,
Thursday, October 7, 2004, 10:11:36 AM, MikeD (3) wrote:
Click Add and then point it at the 'bayesit' folder and select the
'bayesit.tbp'
Done.
That will get things started. Next you have to start showing it what
is good email (i.e. 'ham') and what is spam (that is train it).
Hello Greg,
Sunday, October 10, 2004, 8:21:19 PM, Greg Strong wrote:
If you have saves a lot of spam and ham samples, you can train it on
those saved letters. That will speed up the training process.
How do you do this?
,- [ per mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] in TBBETA ]
| Just select the 500
ON Thursday, October 7, 2004, 3:53:29 PM, you wrote:
DT Hi there, how do I configure the filter in version 3?
Hi Dave,
Go to Options-preferencesanti spam and select Bayes Filter. Now press
the config button and you will find all the options.
PS:
Your cut mark is not working it is missing a
Hello Dave,
Thursday, October 7, 2004, 8:53:29 AM, you wrote:
DT Hi there, how do I configure the filter in version 3?
You have to unarchive it and it's support files. I keep mine in a
folder called (big surprise) 'bayesit' that is in the 'TheBat' program
tree.
Next you start TB and go to
Hi Steve
Does anybody know if there a comprehensive BayesIt web page in English, such
as the Russian http://www.ritlabs.com/ru/solutions/BayesIt.php.
I'd like to know if there is one, too.
I'm frustrated enough with BayesIt's inability to recognize junk mail, that
I'm ready to switch back
Dear Neal,
@25-Sep-2004, 09:55 -0800 (25-Sep 18:55 UK time) Neal Laugman [NL] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Steve:
I'm frustrated enough with BayesIt's inability to recognize junk
mail,
... snip
NL I'm amazed at the varying experiences everyone has. So far with TB
NL v3 I started with
Neal,
I'm, using 06.6, which I thought was the latest version. BayesIt hasn't
worked well for me since the version that came with The Bat 2.12; I don't
remember its version number.
Do you have the URL for 0.6.8? The web site for BayesIt
http://klirik.narod.ru/usefuls/bayesiteng.htm lists 0.4
Dear P,
@25-Sep-2004, 19:37 -0500 (26-Sep 01:37 UK time) P.Johnson [PJ] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck:
MDP ... I switched to Achim Winklers BayesFilter. That worked well
MDP *except* ... it has an auto-whitelist function.
PJ Can you tell me a little more about the auto-whitelist? I've
I, too, just installed The Bat! plug-in Achim Winklers BayesFilter. From my
first test, it seems to be quite a cut above BayesIt. (For those who want to
try it, you can get it from
http://www.lkcc.org/achim/download/bayesfilter1.5.4.exe.) I'll probably move
my white and black lists from K9, but
Hi Michael
This is a request for BayesIT to tell me what it is doing. 6.7
counted everything as spam. 6.8 counts everything as good.
Haven't had the problem with 0.6.8 and no false positives at all. I'm
running neither white nor black lists.
I try to read the log, but it is incomprehensible.
Hello Neal,
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004, Neal mused about BayesIT! What is it doing?
(at least in part):
NL Haven't had the problem with 0.6.8 and no false positives at all. I'm
NL running neither white nor black lists.
The only thing I have in my white list are the TBUDL, TBBETA, TBTECH
and TBOT
I was also told that the problem is fixed in 0.6.4. Where/how can I get the upgrade
to BayesIt?
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/bayesit/bayesit066.rar
or if you *really* want 0.6.4
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/bayesit/bayesit064.rar
--
Hello Joe,
Monday, September 20, 2004, 9:37:45 AM, you wrote:
J Hello,
J I am having a crash about twice a day and was told the problem is with BayesIt!
0.6.00.
J I was also told that the problem is fixed in 0.6.4. Where/how
J can I get the upgrade to BayesIt?
Actually look for ver 0.6.5 at
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/bayesit/bayesit066.rar
OK so I download it but I get a format error when unstuffing it.
Anyone any ideas?
Download it again. It worked fine here.
Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
On Mon 20-Sep-04 10:35am -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was also told that the problem is fixed in 0.6.4.
Where/how can I get the upgrade to BayesIt?
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/bayesit/bayesit066.rar
or if you *really* want 0.6.4
Keep in mind that 0.6.6 is not a complete bayesit install. It is
designed to replace a couple of files in the 0.6.5 install. I am not
sure it will work correctly over top of 0.6.4 or earlier versions.
Yes, that is true. I only realised that when I actually *looked* in the .rar file :)
Hi,
TH Spam frequency dictionary:
TH ° C:\Documents and Settings\Terrance Harris\Application
TH Data\The Bat!\bayesit\base\spamdict.bye
TH ° Size: 1373 letters.
TH ° Capacity: 84 words.
TH Non-spam frequency dictionary:
TH ° C:\Documents and Settings\Terrance
Hello Terrance,
Monday, September 6, 2004, 11:50:53 PM, you wrote:
TH -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
TH Hash: SHA1
TH -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
TH Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32)
TH iD8DBQFBPT4PD9yJdiuqiRERAsxtAJsGTU1Ij+G6b6vV9O+vEEqbIKz3cgCfU9wy
TH VZQabA+io6pmZOlPp2WGFfA=
TH =eei6
Dear Neal,
-- Montag, 6. September 2004, 22:52:23:
PJ Thanks; any tips on how to successfully get BayesIT installed?
vbg This is the problem; I have this addressed along with several
other testers on TBBETA with no answer yet. The next thing on my
list is to do a complete re-install of
Hi Paul,
PJ Can anyone point me to info regarding BayesIT and BayesFilter.
PJ What is the difference between them?
BayesIT will actually work if you can get it installed. I've never
been able to get the other one to do anything except grab program
focus for a couple of seconds and then give me a
Hi Paul,
On Monday, September 6, 2004 16:41 our local time, Paul Jansen [PJ]
wrote;
PJ What is the difference between them?
I've been using BayesFilter for about a month now after using SpamPal
for a while and am extremely satisfied with the results. After training
it with about 850 spam mails
On Mon 6-Sep-04 3:52pm -0400, Neal Laugman wrote:
PJ Thanks; any tips on how to successfully get BayesIT
PJ installed?
vbg This is the problem; I have this addressed along
with several other testers on TBBETA with no answer yet.
I've had no problem with installing it. v3 comes with it
Hello Paul,
On 7 Sep 2004 at 23:23:19 +0100 GMT [00:23 CEST] you wrote:
PJ So I have to retrain each time I upgrade the BayesIT plugin. That
PJ seems rather painful.
No. Only when upgrading from v0.4 or older.
--
Cheers, The Bat! 2.12.00 on
Andre Windows XP
Hello Lars,
Saturday, September 4, 2004, 7:43:12 AM, you wrote:
LS Hello,
LS when I try to add the BayesIt! filter to the list of anti
LS spam plugings (by selecting it in the installation folder of The
LS Bat!), I get an error message, as long as the user has no
LS administrator rights (which
There must be a login on the system that has admin privledges. You
can't delete them all. You will need to log in with one of those
accounts and either grant your regular account permission to add the
plugin or add it from that account.
The plugin has to be added for every user. By that
It is also possible that it is just a permissions problem on the plug
in file itself that needs to be changed.
Could be. Has no one else this problem, or are all people out there working with admin
rights for their accounts?
--
With best regards
Lars Sölter
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The
Besides adjusting access for the plugin, you may need to 'fiddle'
some other tb file rights as well.
I have tried to give the users write rights to the installation folder of The Bat!.
But that seems not to be the problem.
Sorry I can't be more specific.
Thank's to you any way :)
--
Hello Sean,
Thursday, September 2, 2004, 10:19:58 AM, you wrote:
SH Is the new version of Bayesit (bundled with TB3.0) supposed to work
SH with IMAP, or is it POP only?
It *SHOULDN'T* matter. But, as with all things, YMMV.
--
Best regards,
MikeDmailto:[EMAIL
Dear MikeD,
-- Mittwoch, 1. September 2004, 16:08:19:
PC [http://www.ritlabs.com/download/bayesit/bayesit053.rar]
That is a bit out of date. 0.5.5 is the one that is included in the
2.12 TB distribution and the latest I have seen is 0.5.11.
I need to download v0.5.9 and don't know the
Wed, 1 Sep 2004 16:32:22 +0200 (10:32 AM EDT here) Eddie Castelli wrote:
I need to download v0.5.9 and don't know the exact link. Can someone
post it please? Thanks ...
I tried a Google Advanced search of English documents for:
Bayesit 0.5.11 download
I found this link in one of the
Hello Eddie,
On 1 Sep 2004 at 16:32:22 +0200 GMT [16:32 CEST] you wrote:
EC I need to download v0.5.9 and don't know the exact link. Can someone
EC post it please? Thanks ...
I don't know what's wrong with the newer ones but 0.59 you can get here:
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 23:59:29 +0200, Andre Wichartz wrote:
Hello Peter,
On 24 Aug 2004 at 16:58:43 -0400 GMT [22:58 CEST] you wrote:
PK Where can I find the latest version of BayesIt for download?
PK The site given in Plugin-BayesIt is a Russian language page of Ritlab.
PK TIA
Hello Christopher,
Friday, August 27, 2004, 6:32:48 PM, you wrote:
CB Hi List,
CB I installed bayesit 0.5.5 about a week ago. I trained it up
CB on the folder of junk mail I had collected, and on the non-junk.
CB Then every morning, I do a manual 'mark as junk'. To date, my junk
CB folder
Hello Philip Storry,
27-Aug-2004 22:00, you wrote:
I even marked my Sent mails as not-junk when training, on the
egotistical presumption that nobody writes the kind of email I'd like
to recieve better than myself! *grins*
Thats is indeed a very common practice. Our antispam solution at work
1 - 100 of 225 matches
Mail list logo
