Re: [tw5] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

2020-04-12 Thread Vayira
I've been very happy using waterfox classic as a browser. It is based on the older firefox code and runs the TiddlyFox extension quite happily. It also has the advantage of running other extensions that died when firefox changed such as Tab Mix Plus, which I really missed when Firefox forcibly

Re: [tw5] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

2020-04-12 Thread Boaz Nash
Thank you for the response, Yakov. I have created an issue: https://github.com/ibnishak/Timimi/issues/40 Best regards, Boaz On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 7:30 AM Yakov wrote: > Hi Boaz, > > I have been saving tiddlywiki changes using timimi for awhile now and it's >> been working great. >>

Re: [tw5] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

2020-04-12 Thread Yakov
Hi Boaz, I have been saving tiddlywiki changes using timimi for awhile now and it's > been working great. > Unfortunately, I just updated my MacOS to Catalina, and now when I try to > save in Firefox, I get the error message > ""timimi" cannot be opened because the developer cannot be

[tw5] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

2020-04-11 Thread Sebastian Theilhaber
Na - I'm not. Like it too much and invested far far too much... That would have to be a major earthquake style event... The save-function-frustration got me at times in the past, but with my current arrangement I am quite happy. That is: I simply close the tiddler (which will save the file -

[tw5] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

2020-04-11 Thread TonyM
Never Give up on TiddlyWiki without giving these forums the chance to help. Many of us do not have the problems you face/d because we used other solutions, although I can't comment on the latest MAC OS I am confident, I still have half a dozen workarounds. Regards Tony On Friday, April 10,

[tw5] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

2020-04-11 Thread Sebastian Theilhaber
I'm not sure whether or not you are asking me to share my thoughts on this - here they are: I'm that kind of person who isn't equipped - and doesn't have the time to invest - in managing github-stuff. The readme sounds complicated comparing to my current management (which really only involves

[tw5] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

2020-04-10 Thread 'Mark S.' via TiddlyWiki
The polly project (https://github.com/Marxsal/polly/) has been looking for feedback from Mac users. Polly basically leverages the default download saver, restoring your files from the download directory to your original working directory. Alas, it uses Powershell as the intermediary tool, which

[tw5] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

2020-04-09 Thread Sebastian Theilhaber
Oh man do I hear you... I used to use the file backup from pmario and it's worked for me for years, however, broke to the point that effectively I had to click through to save the file- and backup-save every time by hand. That however completely broke down when moving on to FF74 (I'm a fan of

Re: [tw5] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

2020-04-09 Thread Boaz Nash
Hi all, I have been saving tiddlywiki changes using timimi for awhile now and it's been working great. Unfortunately, I just updated my MacOS to Catalina, and now when I try to save in Firefox, I get the error message ""timimi" cannot be opened because the developer cannot be verified". I tried

Re: [tw5] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

2020-03-28 Thread Yakov
Hi Alex, I just tried Timimi. Though installation seemed to work (got the "Hello > there > / Have a great day" message) I still get an error message when I try to > save > changes to a TW file. > > I removed all other TW related plugins to make sure there weren't any > conflicts, but no

Re: [tw5] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

2020-03-25 Thread Vayira
Hi Tony I just looked for TW-Reciever and found it on github. It doesn't say there if it will work with TW classic. Do you know? On Tue, 24 Mar 2020 at 20:25, TonyM wrote: > Alex, > > That's good, I just know that has being the mistake of many. > > Please consider starting a new thread on this

Re: [tw5] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

2020-03-24 Thread TonyM
Alex, That's good, I just know that has being the mistake of many. Please consider starting a new thread on this problem because it is clearly and exception to the old TiddlyFox problems. You may find it useful if you have not already to start with a fresh tiddlywiki and see if you can

Re: [tw5] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

2020-03-24 Thread Alex S. Garcia
> "save changes" links under Admin Tools must be within TiddlyWiki not > Browser menus! Browser menus? I have no idea what you're talking about. Admin Tools is in the right-side menu within TiddlyWiki. Alex. -- -

Re: [tw5] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

2020-03-24 Thread TonyM
To be clear, "save changes" links under Admin Tools must be within TiddlyWiki not Browser menus! Regards Tony On Wednesday, March 25, 2020 at 5:09:16 AM UTC+11, Alex S. Garcia wrote: > > >- yes, Timimi works with it in modern FireFox (with several minor > >issues, but generally it

Re: [tw5] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

2020-03-24 Thread Vayira
I'm experimenting with MainTiddlyServer as an option as it will never depend on browsers & extensions etc and works locally and remotely with a single 70k file. https://yakovl.github.io/MainTiddlyServer/index.html It works like a dream on my remote server. On my local server I got 2 kinds of error

Re: [tw5] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

2020-03-24 Thread Alex S. Garcia
>- yes, Timimi works with it in modern FireFox (with several minor >issues, but generally it works even better than TiddlyFox) I just tried Timimi. Though installation seemed to work (got the "Hello there / Have a great day" message) I still get an error message when I try to save

Re: [tw5] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

2020-03-24 Thread Yakov
Hi everybody, considering TiddlyWiki Classic: - yes, Timimi works with it in modern FireFox (with several minor issues, but generally it works even better than TiddlyFox) - yes, I and Mark Kerrigan recently put most of the saving methods together at

Re: [tw5] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

2020-03-22 Thread Birthe C
It should work, you will find it listed https://classic.tiddlywiki.com/#%5B%5BSetting%20up%20saving%5D%5D Birthe mandag den 23. marts 2020 kl. 05.30.09 UTC+1 skrev vayira: > > Does timimi work with TW classic or only TW5? > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Re: [tw5] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

2020-03-22 Thread Vayira
Does timimi work with TW classic or only TW5? On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 at 00:17, Birthe C wrote: > Alex, > > Please do not give up before trying Timimi. Look here for the extra step > needed https://ibnishak.github.io/Timimi/#Installing%20Timimi > > Birthe > > -- > You received this message because

Re: [tw5] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

2020-03-22 Thread Birthe C
Alex, Please do not give up before trying Timimi. Look here for the extra step needed https://ibnishak.github.io/Timimi/#Installing%20Timimi Birthe -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop

Re: [tw5] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

2020-03-22 Thread TonyM
Alex, With respect I think you only have the problem because you possibly have not explored all the currently available solutions. Don't try and use obsolete plugins. There are arguably too many ways to save your tiddlywiki now. Please start a new thread and *explain what you want to do*,

Re: [tw5] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

2020-03-22 Thread PMario
On Sunday, March 22, 2020 at 5:05:41 PM UTC+1, Alex S. Garcia wrote: To your point, I am indeed using an even more recent version of Firefox > (68.4.1esr) but that doesn't make the issue any less relevant. Plugin is > still > broken and I still can't save changes. > You can use the

Re: [tw5] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

2020-03-22 Thread Alex S. Garcia
> Why would you say "I might have to drop using TW entirely"? Because if I can't save changes to TW, then TW becomes useless. > *The title and leading posts are out of date and no longer relevant. Almost > 3 years OLD* > [...] > but if you are browser junkie what problem do you have? To

Re: [tw5] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

2020-03-21 Thread TonyM
Alex, Why would you say "I might have to drop using TW entirely"? *The title and leading posts are out of date and no longer relevant. Almost 3 years OLD* I like TiddlyDesktop because I can launch programs and windows explorer etc.. in it, I am sure you may be able to launch shell scripts and

Re: [tw5] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

2020-03-21 Thread Alex S. Garcia
I just downloaded TiddlyDesktop and gave it a shot. It's interesting. Could help as a temporary workaround, though I can't see myself using this indefinitely. It's nowhere near as convenient as editing it in my browser. I might have to drop using TW entirely, though not sure yet what I'd

Re: [tw5] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

2020-03-21 Thread TonyM
Mark I think people may be clining onto extensions within Firefox no longer available since around v57, so tiddlydesktop does not have these extensions, however at least some of the former extensions have being re released in firefox. I sympathise with ff and its extensions but I no longer

Re: [tw5] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

2020-03-21 Thread 'Mark S.' via TiddlyWiki
On Saturday, March 21, 2020 at 9:19:33 AM UTC-7, vayira wrote: > > Because TiddlyDesktop is not a browser and the having TW in a browser tab > is so useful. > > > How so? Sure, it it's in the same browser that you do all your regular browsing in. But if you need a special browser, then why

Re: [tw5] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

2020-03-21 Thread Vayira
Because TiddlyDesktop is not a browser and the having TW in a browser tab is so useful. On Sat, 21 Mar 2020 at 10:36, 'Mark S.' via TiddlyWiki < tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com> wrote: > I can understand that fans of FF want to continue using FF. But if you're > on a desktop, and having to use

[tw5] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

2020-03-21 Thread 'Mark S.' via TiddlyWiki
I can understand that fans of FF want to continue using FF. But if you're on a desktop, and having to use Beaker, Waterfox, or an old version of FF, why not just use TiddlyDesktop ? On Saturday, October 28, 2017 at 2:33:51 AM UTC-7, Norm Davis wrote: > > > Firefox and Tiddly have long been

Re: [tw5] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

2020-03-20 Thread TonyM
I just want to add, the apocalypse is over a long time ago Timimi works as well as TiddlyFox, if not better, on the latest firefox, Regards Tony On Saturday, March 21, 2020 at 10:24:06 AM UTC+11, Julio Peña wrote: > > Ah, Victor, glad to hear! > > Julio > > On Friday, March 20, 2020 at 1:01:55

Re: [tw5] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

2020-03-20 Thread Julio Peña
Ah, Victor, glad to hear! Julio On Friday, March 20, 2020 at 1:01:55 PM UTC-4, VÍCTOR wrote: > > Thank you Julio, I'm exploring now Beaker Browse, it seems it works very > well > > > > Victor > > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki"

Re: [tw5] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

2020-03-20 Thread VÍCTOR
Thank you Julio, I'm exploring now Beaker Browse, it seems it works very well Victor -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

[tw5] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

2020-03-17 Thread Julio Peña
Hello there, I use Waterfox (offshoot of Firefox) which still supports the Tiddlyfox extension. Regards, Julio -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

[tw5] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

2020-03-17 Thread Víctor Sarmiento
It seems I am quite late, but perhaps my solution could be useful for anyone yet I use the latest version of firefox for the web and I use a portable firefox (43.0.1) disconected from internet to build my tiddlywikis Víctor El sábado, 28 de octubre de 2017, 11:33:51 (UTC+2), Norm Davis

[tw5] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

2018-11-05 Thread Boaz Nash
Hmm, yes, I do have python installed, but of course it may not be installed correctly, or maybe I need to set some environment variables differently... Thanks for the tip. Boaz On Monday, November 5, 2018 at 4:42:48 PM UTC-7, Mark S. wrote: > > Looking over the docs, I don't see that it mentions

[tw5] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

2018-11-05 Thread 'Mark S.' via TiddlyWiki
Looking over the docs, I don't see that it mentions Python. I'm pretty sure you need Python installed in order for Timimi to work. Is python on your Mac system? Good luck! -- Mark On Monday, November 5, 2018 at 3:15:20 PM UTC-8, Boaz Nash wrote: > > Thanks Tony. It looks good. But so far I

[tw5] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

2018-11-05 Thread Boaz Nash
Thanks Tony. It looks good. But so far I wasn't able to get Timimi to work on OSX. It looks like it is installed, and I can press the "check" symbol to save, and it says "wiki saved", but the file itself is not saved. On Monday, November 5, 2018 at 3:49:28 PM UTC-7, TonyM wrote: > > Boaz, > >

[tw5] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

2018-11-05 Thread TonyM
Boaz, Timimi is Great, Even better than tiddlyfox because you do not need to click on the cat. We have well and truly passed the "FireFox apocalypse" and it spawned substantial innovation. The save and serve tiddlywiki solutions are maturing and its slowly becoming easier to choose between

[tw5] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

2018-11-05 Thread Boaz Nash
Thanks Josiah, I will see if I can install Timimi! On Monday, November 5, 2018 at 8:11:07 AM UTC-7, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: > > This thread is a marker for what users need. It has had over FOUR THOUSAND > views! > > Mark S. gave good solutions. There are others. IMO timimi is good for > several

[tw5] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

2018-11-05 Thread @TiddlyTweeter
This thread is a marker for what users need. It has had over FOUR THOUSAND views! Mark S. gave good solutions. There are others. IMO timimi is good for several platforms, including OSX, https://github.com/ibnishak/Rimini. It saves in the seamless way TiddlyFox did. Josiah On Monday, 5

[tw5] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

2018-11-05 Thread Boaz Nash
Thanks for the suggestions, Mark. I use OSX on a Mac. I have most of my TW files in my MyDocs folder and various sub-folders in there. I tried tiddlyserver a while back and briefly got it to work. I can't remember why I stopped using it. Something about it conflicted with my usual

[tw5] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

2018-11-05 Thread 'Mark S.' via TiddlyWiki
There are multiple approaches that will allow you to keep your existing TW's and pathing IF your paths are relative, you're running Windows or Linux. Nothing is as convenient to set up as TiddlyFox, but it is doable. You can use tiddlyserver. ts serves up most files and uses relative paths.

[tw5] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

2018-11-05 Thread Boaz Nash
Just found this thread and thought I'd try to get involved with TiddlyWiki again. This issue with TiddlyFox really killed me with TiddlyWiki. I still use Firefox as my default browser, so its annoying to have to switch to a different browser just for TW. Also, I have TW files all over the