G'day Tones,
Thank you much for taking the time.
As a career senior systems analyst and now freelance information systems
consultant, I appreciate where you are coming from.
It just boils down to different perspectives about wiki.
I've never liked applying to wikis the kind of rules,
Charlie,
I am all for diversity and different ways about thinking. It keeps the
world rich and interesting and a great source of new and innovative ideas.
Perhaps you take my use of the work lazy differently or too seriously. As
an information and knowledge management professional, I come
Hence my "do what makes sense for you and what you are doing."
And me not understanding how relink could make anybody lazy. I can't think
of a use case in which relink could make a person lazy.
If there is information value in remembering (recording) what was and not
just what is, then do
Charlie.
Perhaps it does not make you lazy, but if for example you use Bombay, then
realise its no longer called that, just renaming to Mumbai, Knowing relink
updates it everywhere is lazy. Bombay is lost to your wiki.
Renaming it then adding a tiddler for Bombay with a connection to Mumbai
Well, TiddlyTweeter said "SERIOUS IMPLICIT KNOWLEDGE," so I can't take the
kudos for that.
I can't imagine how relink could make anybody lazy. I want relink to
handle it because I prefer focus on churning the intertwingled thoughts as
tiddlers without the sticks-in-the-wheels,
This is where I think relink can make people lazy. The unique key to a
tiddler is the title, but it is so easy to change the key, which is a
powerful benefit but there are a subset of situations where changing the
key needs further thought.
If relink just "handles it", we may just forget the
Right!
But there is SERIOUS IMPLICIT KNOWLEDGE at work knowing that Mumbai IS
Bombay
Do these transforms inform the user of what is going on an why?
Just asking for a friend,
TT
On Friday, 23 July 2021 at 15:03:34 UTC+2 PMario wrote:
> On Thursday, July 22, 2021 at 5:14:00 PM UTC+2 springer
On Thursday, July 22, 2021 at 5:14:00 PM UTC+2 springer wrote:
And as much as you may "choose my tiddler names well enough when needed so
> they need not change in future", renaming a tiddler is not always a matter
> of realizing that you failed to have foresight the first time around. (My
>
Just a reminder that, although maybe a little odd-looking, all kinds of
neat filtering can be setup in a tiddler link (i.e. for tiddler lookup from
outside a TiddlyWiki) to help prevent link rot.
For example:
https://tiddlywiki-programming.neocities.org/CJ_TiddlyWikiProgramming.html#:
Tones,
This again is a place where different users may have different needs. I
love the fact that if I share a permalink, the #TiddlerTitle at the end is
not an indecipherable UID, but something recognizable and meaningful to the
recipient (and even to myself, going back into my emails and
Charlie,
Yes that is a very good idea if we build a search based permalink button,
if could even be called a 404 tiddler with search or "did you mean" list
(to match the missing page in html error code). But when I think about it
if one uses the share button will there ever be a not found
Yeah, I only meant the building of that part you mentioned in the early
part of your post, i.e.:
*a tiddler with the "permalink" field=1*
*the url wiki-url.html#:[permalink[1]] *
That was the only thing I had previously played with, and I thought you
meant to only build that, not all of the
Charlie,
Yes, very similar, It is less about that working example which illustrates
why we need not put much effort to obtain what is being discussed, but I do
go on to discuss related issues and opportunities, such as creating
bookmarks, did your reference solution include a share button for
I've never used that link (to a specific post) feature. That's a new trick
for me. Thanks!
https://groups.google.com/g/tiddlywiki/c/nEDB3zRBALY/m/z0BXBncwBAAJ
Well, I didn't' spend any time making it pretty ...
On Thursday, July 22, 2021 at 12:29:08 AM UTC-3 TW Tones wrote:
> Charlie,
>
> I
Charlie,
I am not sure. I can't find that specific reply in this thread. Can you
give me a link from the actual reply please?
I expect its something similar but with a different scope.
Thanks
Tones
On Thursday, 22 July 2021 at 13:12:58 UTC+10 cj.v...@gmail.com wrote:
> Silly question: are
Silly question: are you suggesting you are going to build what I already
built and mentioned a little earlier in this thread (Jul 20, 2021, 10:09:07
AM) ?
On Wednesday, July 21, 2021 at 10:17:10 PM UTC-3 TW Tones wrote:
> Springer et al,
>
> Forgive me for repeating myself, although a lot of
Springer et al,
Forgive me for repeating myself, although a lot of interesting ideas, I
believe these to be *non-problems.*
A simple solution is available here. an Example would be an alternate
button to simple permalinks, I think someone else used a share icon. When
clicking this on a given
17 matches
Mail list logo
