Re: [tw] Voicing Futures ...

Hi Jeremy, It sounds like I didn't come across very clearly. I apologise. Hopefully this will help clarify. Even the server and online versions download everything in few files and the core idea again is one file. I think here you are referring to the configuration where the server serves a full

Re: [tw] Voicing Futures ...

Hi Arlen > > The tiddlywiki architecture is inherently single file. I’d respectfully disagree with that statement. TiddlyWiki 5 has a chicken and egg architecture: the Node.js configuration is the chicken; the egg that it produces is the standalone single file configuration. But note the

Re: Re: [tw] Voicing Futures ...

The tiddlywiki architecture is inherently single file. This is why it is so hard to get multi-user configured properly. You would have to virtually dismantle tiddlywiki and put it together differently to get anything as static as Wikipedia. Even the server and online versions download everything

Re: Re: [tw] Voicing Futures ...

Ciao Danielo Thanks for your response. On Wednesday, 22 March 2017 12:51:15 UTC+1, Danielo Rodríguez wrote: > > > Very good questions. I think they should be added to the official FAQ. > Would you mind to open an issue to the official NoteSelf Repo? > Sure. If it is helpful. > 3 -

Re: Re: [tw] Voicing Futures ...

Hello Josiah Very good questions. I think they should be added to the official FAQ. Would you mind to open an issue to the official NoteSelf Repo? > 1 - its unclear how exactly to sign up to Cloudant. And whether they will > CHARGE your Credit Card. Do you need to pay to just test? > Those

Re: Re: [tw] Voicing Futures ...

Ciao Danielo *I agree with all you write. All the components are mature and work.* WHY is it so difficult to get started? 1 - its unclear how exactly to sign up to Cloudant. And whether they will CHARGE your Credit Card. Do you need to pay to just test? 2 - its unclear what in SelfNote is the

Re: Re: [tw] Voicing Futures ...

Hello @Mat > I agree it deserves a LOT more attention, not least on the boards. (I'll > try to plug NoteSelf when it is relevant. > ;-) > Thanks! > > As for using it, I can't talk for others but the FAQ reads: > > [...]Can I use for production/very important

Re: Re: [tw] Voicing Futures ...

Lost admin, Do you mean that TiddlyChrome app isn't working or were you talking about the download router? Thanks, -Arlen On Mar 17, 2017 12:52 PM, "Mat" wrote: > @Danielo > > I'm not sure why most people ignore it or have decided to not talk about >> it. > > > I agree it

Re: Re: [tw] Voicing Futures ...

@Danielo I'm not sure why most people ignore it or have decided to not talk about it. I agree it deserves a LOT more attention, not least on the boards. (I'll try to plug NoteSelf when it is relevant. ;-) As for using it, I can't talk for others but the FAQ

Re: Re: [tw] Voicing Futures ...

El viernes, 17 de marzo de 2017, 15:16:50 (UTC+1), Lost Admin escribió: > > I looked at it. It looks interesting. I liked the idea. I couldn't find > any instructions on how to set-up my own server to host my own. > I want to add subtitles and some voice explanations, and add it to the main

Re: Re: [tw] Voicing Futures ...

I looked at it. It looks interesting. I liked the idea. I couldn't find any instructions on how to set-up my own server to host my own. On Friday, March 17, 2017 at 4:28:32 AM UTC-4, Danielo Rodríguez wrote: > > Thank you Josiah for mentioning NoteSelf. > I'm not sure why most people ignore it

Re: Re: [tw] Voicing Futures ...

I posted the link. It turns out it stopped working on current versions of Chrome because Google altered functionality for security reasons. I'm using an older version of Chrome (because my employer hasn't upgraded yet, so it works for me). The link is

Re: Re: [tw] Voicing Futures ...

Thank you Josiah for mentioning NoteSelf. I'm not sure why most people ignore it or have decided to not talk about it. It has all the three ootions: autosave on your local browser , manual download option and automatic synchronization to a remote databases. I use it daily both at my work and

Re: Re: [tw] Voicing Futures ...

Possibly also of interest: Downloads Router Chrome Extension to (perhaps) always have TW files go to a designated local folder. <:-) On Thursday, March 16, 2017 at 10:04:11 PM UTC+1, Mat wrote: > > I could swear someone

Re: Re: [tw] Voicing Futures ...

I could swear someone posted a link above to some Chrome extension.. or at least mentioned on, but since I can't find it; Downloads Overwrite Already Existing File and on github

Re: Re: [tw] Voicing Futures ...

Ciao Arlen & all Arlen Beiler wrote: > > What if we would combine the best of both words? > I do think that is something in all this. Perhaps it not so cut and dry? Personally I am very interested in Danielo's ongoing project of a TW that BOTH can auto-save into Browser Storage (into an

Re: Re: [tw] Voicing Futures ...

The challenge with any solution that involves more than using a web browser is that some of us won't be able to use it. I suspect this group is a small sub-set of TiddlyWiki users, so your idea still has merit and, I think, should be pursued. I use TiddyWiki at work because most of the

Re: Re: [tw] Voicing Futures ...

Are you allowed to use portable apps? I am thinking of something that would not require installation. On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 12:44 PM, Lost Admin wrote: > The challenge with any solution that involves more than using a web > browser is that some of us won't be able to

Re: Re: [tw] Voicing Futures ...

Any thoughts? On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 10:53 AM, Arlen Beiler wrote: > I'm thinking of a simple one file store.js file that would allow you to > load any TiddlyWiki from the folder you are serving and it would post the > changes back to the server. > > node.exe store.js

Re: Re: [tw] Voicing Futures ...

I'm thinking of a simple one file store.js file that would allow you to load any TiddlyWiki from the folder you are serving and it would post the changes back to the server. node.exe store.js /path/to/my/folder Navigate to http://127.0.0.1 and it will show you a standard directory listing

Re: Re: [tw] Voicing Futures ...

What if we would combine the best of both words? On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 10:48 AM, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: > Ciao all ... > > The starting post for this thread came from a private discussion that > Jeremy Ruston and I had on Twitter. We both realised it would likely be >

Re: Re: [tw] Voicing Futures ...

Ciao all ... The starting post for this thread came from a private discussion that Jeremy Ruston and I had on Twitter. We both realised it would likely be more productive in public ... Central to it is this by Jeremy in response to my queries... Here’s the thing: all the difficulties in

Re: Re: [tw] Voicing Futures ...

Excellent. Regards Jon On Wednesday, 15 March 2017 13:10:16 UTC, Jeremy Ruston wrote: > > Hello Everyone, > > It’s a shame to see this thread go a little off the rails as this is an > important and interesting discussion — which may be why it has aroused such > passions. That passion is

Re: Re: [tw] Voicing Futures ...

Ciao Jeremy, Pmario, Mat & others ... Thanks for pointing out the drift in the wrong direction. I agree its not terribly construction. My apologies to Eric if I came over as aggressive. I think my point is actually a broader one that I will try to present in a later post. By way of

Re: Re: [tw] Voicing Futures ...

Hello Everyone, It’s a shame to see this thread go a little off the rails as this is an important and interesting discussion — which may be why it has aroused such passions. That passion is itself an important component of the TiddlyWiki community: for many of us, using and working on