Re: [tw] Re: Should TiddlyServer include TiddlyWiki and Node?

I've pushed an update to master which will now fail quickly and log an error message if there is an error creating the backup. So it will be in the next release. Thank you for your feedback, it helps a lot. On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 12:13 PM, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: > Ciao

Re: [tw] Re: Should TiddlyServer include TiddlyWiki and Node?

Ciao Arlen Great! None of my addresses have spaces or encoding needed characters. I'm gonna delete the "bookmarklet". Best wishes Josiah Arlen Beiler wrote: > > The bookmarklet is not needed in all cases, such as where there are no > percent-encoded characters or spaces in the url. > --

Re: [tw] Re: Should TiddlyServer include TiddlyWiki and Node?

Ciao Arlen & Mark S. Indeed, removing the line ... "backupDirectory": "backup" ... seems to have solved the issue. (Fingers crossed) It may be worth mentioning in the documentation that *if you don't need backup you should remove the backup line*? Anyway, that seems like it was my issue.

Re: [tw] Re: Should TiddlyServer include TiddlyWiki and Node?

Ciao Mark S. I did NOT make a backup directory. I don't need it. I already run redundant backup from an external program that detects changes every 10 minutes or so. Could that be an issue? That I don't need back-up? My json file is this ... { "tree": { "crusoe":

Re: [tw] Re: Should TiddlyServer include TiddlyWiki and Node?

Hi Josiah, I would verify that the original TW can still load in your browser without the RSOD. Could we see your settings.json file? It looks like it's having problems saving your back-up. Did you make a back-up directory (I believe you need to make the directory by hand). Good luck, Mark

Re: [tw] Re: Should TiddlyServer include TiddlyWiki and Node?

Ciao Arlen I have no idea what I am doing wrong :-(. Josiah Arlen Beiler wrote: > > If the checkmark is red, it did not get saved. > > So click the checkmark if it is red and see what happens. A PUT request > will show up in the log if it was successful. The bookmarklet is not needed > in

Re: [tw] Re: Should TiddlyServer include TiddlyWiki and Node?

Mark S. & Arlen ... I probably done something seriously wrong :-) I'm getting messages on ONE TiddlyWiki like this ... Then a RSOD ... Best wishes Josiah Mark S. wrote: > > On mine the save button greys out as expected. But I still have tiddlyfox > installed. I'm wondering if that

Re: [tw] Re: Should TiddlyServer include TiddlyWiki and Node?

If the checkmark is red, it did not get saved. When you click the checkmark, it will use the first available saver. If the put saver is available, it will use it, if not it will skip to the next one. The TiddlyFox saver (up to TW5 v5.1.14 or so) and the TiddlyFox Firefox plugin (always did, always

Re: [tw] Re: Should TiddlyServer include TiddlyWiki and Node?

On mine the save button greys out as expected. But I still have tiddlyfox installed. I'm wondering if that provides the feedback to tell TW to grey out the cat (all cats are grey when the monitor is off) even when it (TF) isn't doing the actual saving. Mark On Monday, July 10, 2017 at

Re: [tw] Re: Should TiddlyServer include TiddlyWiki and Node?

Ciao Arlen In a TW served by TiddlyServer how do I KNOW its saved? When I click the bookmark* Fix Put Saver *the console shows this ... That means "tw_arbeit_last.html" has been saved? I'm a bit confused as it still shows this in the TW ... Josiah -- You received this message because

Re: [tw] Re: Should TiddlyServer include TiddlyWiki and Node?

Ciao Birthe I aware of it. Though I don't know the operational differences so well. But I think the core of what I wrote still applies. Best wishes Josiah Birthe C wrote: > > Remember not everyone is using Windows. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: [tw] Re: Should TiddlyServer include TiddlyWiki and Node?

Hi Josiah, Remember not everyone is using Windows. Birthe Den mandag den 10. juli 2017 kl. 12.10.56 UTC+2 skrev @TiddlyTweeter: > > Ciao Arlen > > I have got TiddlyServer running (the minimal "portable" version). > > 1 - I have it active in my Portable Apps system. I confirm it IS fully >

Re: [tw] Re: Should TiddlyServer include TiddlyWiki and Node?

Ciao Arlen I have got TiddlyServer running (the minimal "portable" version). 1 - I have it active in my Portable Apps system. I confirm it IS fully portable. I did tests. 2 - It seems it can CO-EXIST in a browser running TiddlyFox. TW's accessed through the IP address (correctly) show no

Re: [tw] Re: Should TiddlyServer include TiddlyWiki and Node?

And the zip (binary) package will not change the registry. So you can just delete the files. The msi (installer) package may add something to the registry and does change PATH, unless you tell it not to. But Node does not use the registry for normal operation, that I know of. I could be wrong

Re: [tw] Re: Should TiddlyServer include TiddlyWiki and Node?

If you paste it into a JSON validator online it should tell you what the trouble is. As you can see, it says unexpected token in JSON, which means, in this case, that the settings file is not formatted correctly (JSON is a little picky). On Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 3:17 PM, 'Mark S.' via TiddlyWiki <

Re: [tw] Re: Should TiddlyServer include TiddlyWiki and Node?

TBH I don't want it needing a set path at all. I want it portable and contained. If its possible. I think it is. Buts its maybe why I'm having trouble getting it to run. At the explicit level it should run without relying on environment variables if all the running bits are together in one

Re: [tw] Re: Should TiddlyServer include TiddlyWiki and Node?

You just unzipped? No install? Not sure how that works (how does Windows find node?) but if that's how you installed then it should be OK to just delete. The regular install, according to some sources, changes the registry. And I'm pretty sure that it puts itself on the path (unless I did that

Re: [tw] Re: Should TiddlyServer include TiddlyWiki and Node?

Thanks Mark S. for that heads up. I did not realise it was changing the registry. Perhaps not as I did the Zip route. I'll check. Josiah Mark S. wrote: > > I would use the uninstall through the menu so everything gets cleaned up > (including paths and registry settings) > -- You received

Re: [tw] Re: Should TiddlyServer include TiddlyWiki and Node?

I would use the uninstall through the menu so everything gets cleaned up (including paths and registry settings) Mark On Saturday, July 8, 2017 at 4:34:33 AM UTC-7, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: > > Ciao Arlen > > I copied node.exe over. Can I safely now delete the "node-v6.11.0-win-x86" > install? >

Re: [tw] Re: Should TiddlyServer include TiddlyWiki and Node?

You could do { "tree": { "tw": "../../../tw" } } and put that in _bucket/tserver (which would make it readable from the browser -- not recommended! Or you could do { "tree": { "crusoe_or_whatever": "../../tw_crusoe" } } and so on. Remember, all paths are relative to settings.json. Sounds, good.

Re: [tw] Re: Should TiddlyServer include TiddlyWiki and Node?

Ciao Arlen Your license is "LICENSE.md", right? Node's is just "LICENSE". So they can co-habit. The only reason I ask is because I am very aware that open source is badly exploited and I just like to pay a bit of attention to that, the work others have done deserves some credit, even if only

Re: [tw] Re: Should TiddlyServer include TiddlyWiki and Node?

Well, that is only necessary if you are redistributing your copy to the public. In this case, you are the end user, so there is no need. Obviously if you give someone else your copy, you should let them know where they can find TiddlyServer and Node online, but that would probably be enough

Re: [tw] Re: Should TiddlyServer include TiddlyWiki and Node?

Ciao Arlen I'm on TiddlyServer 2.0.5. I need a bit of help configuring the *settings.json.*My aim is for a Portable Version. I am on Windows 7. The settings.json gives this for the core paths ... "tree": { "alias": "C:/my folder path", "alias2": {

Re: [tw] Re: Should TiddlyServer include TiddlyWiki and Node?

Ciao Arlen Just a small footnote before I delete the folder. Should I copy over the LICENSE file for node? Would it apply with the moved node.exe alone? Josiah I copied node.exe over. Can I safely now delete the "node-v6.11.0-win-x86" >> install? > > Arlen Beiler wrote: > Yes, the rest is

Re: [tw] Re: Should TiddlyServer include TiddlyWiki and Node?

> > I copied node.exe over. Can I safely now delete the "node-v6.11.0-win-x86" > install? Yes, the rest is basically just NPM related stuff that you don't need. Everything is contained in the node executable. On Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 7:34 AM, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: >

Re: [tw] Re: Should TiddlyServer include TiddlyWiki and Node?

Ciao Arlen I copied node.exe over. Can I safely now delete the "node-v6.11.0-win-x86" install? Best wishes Josiah Arlen Beiler replied: > > Just node.exe is enough. > > @TiddlyTweeter wrote: > >> Mark S. wrote: >>> >>> I was wondering about that too. I think he's referring to the node >>>

Re: [tw] Re: Should TiddlyServer include TiddlyWiki and Node?

Just node.exe is enough. On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 2:35 PM, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: > Ciao Mark S. & Arlen > > Mark S. wrote: >> >> I was wondering about that too. I think he's referring to the node >> executable(s) from nodejs.org. If you have the node executable in the >>

Re: [tw] Re: Should TiddlyServer include TiddlyWiki and Node?

Ciao Mark S. & Arlen Mark S. wrote: > > I was wondering about that too. I think he's referring to the node > executable(s) from nodejs.org. If you have the node executable in the > same directory as the rest of tiddly server, then you don't need to install > nodejs separately or make a long

Re: [tw] Re: Should TiddlyServer include TiddlyWiki and Node?

I was wondering about that too. I think he's referring to the node executable(s) from nodejs.org. If you have the node executable in the same directory as the rest of tiddly server, then you don't need to install nodejs separately or make a long path to the installed executable. I wonder if

Re: [tw] Re: Should TiddlyServer include TiddlyWiki and Node?

I just commented on Github about this .. To a user like me when I read ... Download the latest release of TiddlyServer from > https://github.com/Arlen22/TiddlyServer/releases unzip the folder > contained in the zip file to wherever you want it. *Put the binary in > this folder if you want it

Re: [tw] Re: Should TiddlyServer include TiddlyWiki and Node?

That last one was if you have the node binary in the same folder rather than installed on PATH (in windows terms). Otherwise, copy the complete error output in here and I'll try to take a stab at it. On Jul 6, 2017 07:06, "Arlen Beiler" wrote: > Does it work to do ./node

Re: [tw] Re: Should TiddlyServer include TiddlyWiki and Node?

Does it work to do ./node server ? On Jul 6, 2017 04:18, "Birthe C" wrote: > Hi Arlen, > I am running Linux Mint Mate 32 bit and trying to follow you explanation, > I get an error, something about a symlink missing. > > > Birthe > > > On Thursday, July 6, 2017 at

Re: [tw] Re: Should TiddlyServer include TiddlyWiki and Node?

Hi Arlen, I am running Linux Mint Mate 32 bit and trying to follow you explanation, I get an error, something about a symlink missing. Birthe On Thursday, July 6, 2017 at 4:01:14 AM UTC+2, Arlen Beiler wrote:mAlright, I did it. Check it out if you are interested:

Re: [tw] Re: Should TiddlyServer include TiddlyWiki and Node?

Alright, I did it. Check it out if you are interested: https://github.com/Arlen22/TiddlyServer#bundled-version On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 7:37 PM, Mat wrote: > @Arlen, >> >> > The bar to use TW is pretty high. > From what I understand, TiddlyServer solves some basic needs. >

Re: [tw] Re: Should TiddlyServer include TiddlyWiki and Node?

Yes, I am a man :) Usually the woman's name (to my knowledge) has an extra e at the end (i.e. Arlene). [image: Inline image 1] On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 7:38 AM, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: > Ciao Arlen > > Are you a man or a woman? :-) > > I been meaning to ask for a long