Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Christopher Cain wrote:
>
> > > I don't know what 'long enough' means, my impression is that we had
> a
> > > far too long release cycle for 3.3 already.
> >
> > Don't worry Costin, he doesn't really know what it means either :)
>
> Well, giving
I just posted on Servlets.com a new resource listing the top bugs a
servlet/JSP programmer should know about. They're culled from my email
inbox, based on the most
frequently reported problems sent to me by users. Several directly
involve Apache/Tomcat, so I thought this would be a good forum in
I'd still like to see Tomcat allow the slashes. Here's my argument:
* Allowing two adjacent slashes to remain is not a security risk
* The Apache Web Server allows the slashes to remain
* Tomcat used to allow the slashes to remain
* Code (like mine) which used to work with Tomcat is now breaking
Tomcat always cache my servlet
everytime I edit my servlet program
i need to restart tomcat to get the latest result..
it never happened when i use JServ
how to solve it ? thanks
/* Kenny Ma
[EMAIL PROTECTED] */
Reme,
Thank you for commiting the patch. And it works now.
One other thing is that I need to have xalan.jar inclued in my classpath so
that the tomcat-doc target can be built sucessfully. I read from
BUILDING.txt that the xalan.jar is not a prerequsite but just a
recommendation to have it set.
remm01/09/10 18:34:50
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core
ApplicationContext.java
Log:
- The URLs returned had extra '/' in many cases.
Revision ChangesPath
1.32 +20 -9
jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apach
As I said on another post, I don't know of any major problems with 3.3. So
were I allowed to vote, mine would be +0 since I won't have time to keep up
with such a fast moving target.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 4:
> I tryed to execute the manager aplication and got a 404 error.
>
> I add the following line to tomcat-user.xml
>
I know. The good news is it's fixed already :-)
The bad news is you'll have to wait for RC2 to get the fix :-(
Remy
I tryed to execute the manager aplication and got a 404 error.
I add the following line to tomcat-user.xml
My environment is
Windows 2000 Pro, Sun J2SE 1.3.1, Tomcat 4.0-RC1
The catalina_log.-MM-DD.txt show the folowing error
java.lang.NullPointerException
at org.apache.catali
On Mon, 2001-09-10 at 16:48, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
>
> Why don't we keep a NON-APR (JK), and progress works on APR based on WebApp?
> Joining AJPv14 and WARP?
The important thing in mod_jk is the modularity, the fact that it
supports multiple server adapters and multiple protocols. This part ha
A long release cycle, but a short beta (and a lot of people don't download
until beta). Of course I agree that 3.3 is a great improvement on 3.2 (even
as far back as M2 when I first started using it). Granted, all of the bugs
that I know of in B2 have been fixed, but I've only had it up for abou
On Mon, 2001-09-10 at 16:40, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
> >> A third one could be an API merger between the two... If you want
to talk
> >> about it...
> >
>
> No, I meant between JK and WebApp... :)
Well, webapp has a very nice protocol - it would be a great addition to
jni, ajp12, ajp13 and ajp1
"Christopher Cain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Something is indeed a little bizarre on the list today, mon ami. Maybe
> because Craig isn't here to keep us in line =)
No, I believe we have to thank Jon for that... I believe that raising
another flame war at this point made us all realize that p
"Gomez Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm ok for that, may be by merging ajp14 and warp (ajp20).
Ok... I can agree with that...
> We could have this protocol implementation in mod_jk
> and mod_webapp :)
Sure do...
> I'm serious here...
Me too...
> - with mod_jk, you'll gain AP1.3/AP2.0
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is no question about APR stability or release-like quality. As long
> as APR people are not certain the API will not change and don't put the "1.0"
> label on it.
I have insider news on this (me and David Reid hang out pretty often
together,
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Christopher Cain wrote:
> > I don't know what 'long enough' means, my impression is that we had a
> > far too long release cycle for 3.3 already.
>
> Don't worry Costin, he doesn't really know what it means either :)
Well, giving the bug reports he filled so far - he seems t
"Ryan Bloom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, I'm new to the list, but I like to veto things too. Somebody point me
> at something I can veto... :-)
You can always veto your committer status... :) :) :)
Pier
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
> I don't know what 'long enough' means, my impression is that we had a
> far too long release cycle for 3.3 already.
Don't worry Costin, he doesn't really know what it means either :)
- Christopher
/**
* Pleurez, pleurez, mes yeux, et fondez vous en eau!
*
Hi Attila,
I'll review your changes and I see no problem with fixing
AccessInterceptor and RealmBase. I'm not sure about the new modules - I
think this is a new feature and I'm not very comfortable with features.
If you don't mind, I'll check it in src/proposals first, as a standalone
module. Th
On Monday 10 September 2001 16:15, Christopher Cain wrote:
> Gomez Henri wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > PS: Something goes crasy these days, on tomcat list, what do you think
> > about this Pier (known as my worst enemy :)
>
> Something is indeed a little bizarre on the list today, mon ami. Maybe
> becau
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, William Barker wrote:
> For what it's worth (since I can't vote), I agree with Jon. TC3.3 hasn't
> had a long enough beta cycle yet to push through an RC cycle this fast. As
> it is, I'm going to be lucky to have time to install RC1 before RC2 comes
> out. Keeping up with
Gomez Henri wrote:
[snip]
> PS: Something goes crasy these days, on tomcat list, what do you think
> about this Pier (known as my worst enemy :)
Something is indeed a little bizarre on the list today, mon ami. Maybe
because Craig isn't here to keep us in line =)
a) There are now four key pe
> I'm actually right now working on the thread locks for Windows, and
> then
> I
> am going to start agitating for an APR release. We should have APR
> 1.0
> out
> the door soon-ish. I am hoping to have it released sometime in the
> next
> month
> or two. :-)
That's the last objection to use
En réponse à [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
>
> > "GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Ryan to became more than just a contributer :
> >
> > This is the third time we agree on something in less than 24 hours.
> This
> > implies that either I'm g
Maybe it's a bit late for this, however here it goes; incorporate it if you
like:
I've added support for DIGEST authentication scheme to Tomcat 3.3.
I was able to successfully test it with Opera 5.12 browser WHEN Tomcat
didn't return an Authentication-info header on successful authentication.
Aut
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Cain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 3:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Plan for Tomcat 3.3 (final release)
Okay, okay ... let's not start getting goofy here. As I don't remember
Larry every insinu
Okay, okay ... let's not start getting goofy here. As I don't remember
Larry every insinuating that his decision to release was simply to "keep
up with 4.0", let's leave the rather insulting and uninformed
speculation at home, shall we?
Knowing Larry, I'm not inclined to think that his decisio
On Monday 10 September 2001 15:22, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
> "Ryan Bloom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> MMAP is the other scary stuff in APR, the new code (without Ralph's
> >> libmm) it no more than one month old... I need it for load balancing,
> >> but I want to double check with the guys in CA
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
> >> Mod_jk will use APR - that's certain. The only question is when and how
> >> to do the transition without affecting the stability of the code. Having
> >> an APR1.0 out is one of the requirements - I don't think we can release
> >> mod_jk, even from
"Ryan Bloom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> MMAP is the other scary stuff in APR, the new code (without Ralph's libmm)
>> it no more than one month old... I need it for load balancing, but I want
>> to double check with the guys in CA next week and see what they tell me
>> before publishing any
Greetings!
I know there are two (or three) different classpaths within Tomcat 3.2.
The question is, does Jasper, when compiling JSP files, use the Context
Classpath, which referrs to the WEB-INF/classes directory for that
specific JSP?
If not, how could I add the Context Classpath to the Jasp
> MMAP is the other scary stuff in APR, the new code (without Ralph's libmm)
> it no more than one month old... I need it for load balancing, but I want
> to double check with the guys in CA next week and see what they tell me
> before publishing anything..
Actually, MMAP has been in APR for a l
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> I'm actually right now working on the thread locks for Windows, and then I
> am going to start agitating for an APR release. We should have APR 1.0 out
> the door soon-ish. I am hoping to have it released sometime in the next month
> or two. :-)
That's
"Ryan Bloom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 10 September 2001 14:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> Mod_jk will use APR - that's certain. The only question is when and how
>> to do the transition without affecting the stability of the code. Having
>> an APR1.0 out is one of the requirement
keith 01/09/10 14:51:57
Modified:jk/native/common jk_ajp_common.c jk_ajp_common.h
Log:
Corner case for chunked encoding: if the chunk sizes and
buffers fell such that the buffer was nearly full and the
chunk size digits were too numerous to fit in the remaining
space, the r
"William Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Keeping up with 4.0 isn't a good enough reason, since I'm sure that
> there are plenty of people like me who can't even think of moving to 4.0
> until it has release-quality connectors.
I know... Working on it as fast as I can to fix bugs, and thank
On Monday 10 September 2001 14:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
> > >> This is the third time we agree on something in less than 24 hours.
> > >> This implies that either I'm getting old, or just plain silly...
> > >
> > > Now, if you could agree on merging
Jon Stevens wrote:
[snip]
> If T4.0 FINAL has bugs not in VERIFIED/CLOSED state, then I'm going
> to vote -1 on its release.
FWIW, I agree with that sentiment; but to the best of my knowledge, so
does everyone else. Given that, I really don't anticipate a problem
here. AFAIK, everyone is in
keith 01/09/10 14:43:36
Modified:src/native/mod_jk/common jk_ajp13_worker.c
Log:
Corner case for chunked encoding: if the chunk sizes and
buffers fell such that the buffer was nearly full and the
chunk size digits were too numerous to fit in the remaining
space, the remaini
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
> >> This is the third time we agree on something in less than 24 hours. This
> >> implies that either I'm getting old, or just plain silly...
> >
> > Now, if you could agree on merging mod_webapp and mod_jk, that would be
> > something...
>
> Slowww
For what it's worth (since I can't vote), I agree with Jon. TC3.3 hasn't
had a long enough beta cycle yet to push through an RC cycle this fast. As
it is, I'm going to be lucky to have time to install RC1 before RC2 comes
out. Keeping up with 4.0 isn't a good enough reason, since I'm sure that
"Ryan Bloom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Slowww down... :) If mod_jk wants to start using APR, I believe we're
>> talking, otherwise, I'm done with cross-platform porting, I live it to Ryan
>
> Oh no you don't. I did the cross-platform stuff. I wrote APR to get awar
> from it.
Yeah, tha
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BTW, thank you Pier !
I believe I'm just being fair... We have our disagreements on most of the
technical aspects of the code, that's why, to my disappointment too, we have
TWO releases coming out in parallel, but, as I said last week to Henri, th
On Monday 10 September 2001 14:05, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
> >> "GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> Ryan to became more than just a contributer :
> >>
> >> This is the third time we agree o
on 9/10/01 2:13 PM, "Pier Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, let them do their fucking job... If we gave them committer access, it
> means that we trust them. If they say that 3.3 is ready to go, well, I'm not
> going to stop them because FIRST I never contributed a line of code, SECON
"Jon Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on 9/10/01 1:14 PM, "Pier Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> To be fair, I see only 12 bugs with Tomcat 3.x, and ONLY ONE on 3.3
>
> I'm also worried about regression testing.
Well, let them do their fucking job... If we gave them committer acc
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
>
>> "GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Ryan to became more than just a contributer :
>>
>> This is the third time we agree on something in less than 24 hours. This
>> implies that eith
ccain 01/09/10 14:00:06
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/realm
MemoryRealm.java
Log:
Oops, typo ... we definitely don't want the comparison to be "care" insensitive :)
Revision ChangesPath
1.11 +5 -5
jakarta-tomcat-4.0/
I don't want you running for nothing so...
Your problem is:
- When you are wrong, you are wrong;
- When you are right, you still don't know how to prove it.
OTHO, you always make such a noise protesting that you are right that,
eventually, if you really are right, someone with better communi
on 9/10/01 1:44 PM, "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll read that as:
> "There shouldn't be any confirmed bugs above at major or higher severity
> open in the bug database". Otherwise, I disagree with your statement.
> We can still release if there are some, but that will need a vo
> *sigh* ... ever the diplomat ;-)
The only sure things in life:
death, taxes and Jon's "guerilla diplomacy".
=;o)
Have fun,
Paulo
> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Cain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 9:58 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re
remm01/09/10 13:44:35
Modified:.build.xml
Log:
- Remove some Ant deprecation messages.
- Modernize build script (now that we switched to 1.4).
Revision ChangesPath
1.36 +2 -2 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/build.xml
Index: build.xml
===
remm01/09/10 13:43:57
Modified:webapps/tomcat-docs build.xml
Log:
- Remove some Ant deprecation messages.
- Modernize build script (now that we switched to 1.4).
Revision ChangesPath
1.10 +3 -3 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/webapps/tomcat-docs/build.xml
Index:
remm01/09/10 13:43:33
Modified:jasper build.xml
Log:
- Remove some Ant deprecation messages.
- Modernize build script (now that we switched to 1.4).
Revision ChangesPath
1.21 +19 -9 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/jasper/build.xml
Index: build.xml
Even if this is a majority vote, and so far we seem to have the votes we
need for the release, I think Jon is right on not releasing unless all
the bugs are evaluated and we fix all the bugs that we think are important
and don't destabilize the release.
For 3.3 there is only one reopened bug ( w
> on 9/10/01 1:14 PM, "Pier Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > To be fair, I see only 12 bugs with Tomcat 3.x, and ONLY ONE on 3.3
>
> I'm also worried about regression testing.
>
> >, whereas
> > there are 26 on Tomcat 4.0 currently open, and you didn't vote -1 on
4.0's
> > release plan.
remm01/09/10 13:30:33
Modified:catalina build.xml
Log:
- Remove some Ant deprecation messages.
- Modernize build script (now that we switched to 1.4).
Revision ChangesPath
1.56 +141 -86 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/build.xml
Index: build.xml
==
on 9/10/01 1:14 PM, "Pier Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To be fair, I see only 12 bugs with Tomcat 3.x, and ONLY ONE on 3.3
I'm also worried about regression testing.
>, whereas
> there are 26 on Tomcat 4.0 currently open, and you didn't vote -1 on 4.0's
> release plan... I'm not tryi
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
> Ok, so since I need to try to be the nice guy over here, let's do it this
> way... It seems apparent that the mailing list want to be notified of bugs
> (lots of +1 and no -1), so this is a simple one
>
> [ ] +1 - I want all messages to a new tomcat-bu
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
> "GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Ryan to became more than just a contributer :
>
> This is the third time we agree on something in less than 24 hours. This
> implies that either I'm getting old, or just plain silly...
Now, if you cou
ccain 01/09/10 13:12:58
Modified:catalina/src/bin digest.bat digest.sh
Log:
DES is not a hashing algorithm ;-)
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +2 -2 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/bin/digest.bat
Index: digest.bat
Are you using Tomcat 3.1.x?
>From the tomcat-users mailing list:
http://www2.real-time.com/pipermail/tomcat-users/2000-October/012931.html
The easiest workarounds are...
Add this line to your $HOME/.tomcatrc:
TOMCAT_OPTS="-Djava.protocol.handler.pkgs=sun.net.www.protocol"
Or add this l
"Jon Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on 9/10/01 9:12 AM, "Christopher Cain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>>> = Tomcat 3.3 Final Release Plan Ballot =
>>> [ ] +1I am in favor of this plan, and will help
>>> [ ] +0I am in favor of this plan, but am unable to help
>>> [ ]
"Jon Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just have to say that it is cute how all of you get your panties into a
> wad when I suggest something and then end up going with my original
> suggestion.
>
> :-)
>
> -jon (runs for cover)
Someone might call it "I'm so freaking tired of it so that
Jon Stevens wrote:
> I just have to say that it is cute how all of you get your panties into a
> wad when I suggest something and then end up going with my original
> suggestion.
>
> :-)
>
> -jon (runs for cover)
>
*sigh* ... ever the diplomat ;-)
- Christopher
/**
* Pleurez, pleurez, mes
I just have to say that it is cute how all of you get your panties into a
wad when I suggest something and then end up going with my original
suggestion.
:-)
-jon (runs for cover)
on 9/10/01 9:12 AM, "Christopher Cain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> = Tomcat 3.3 Final Release Plan Ballot =
>> [ ] +1I am in favor of this plan, and will help
>> [ ] +0I am in favor of this plan, but am unable to help
>> [ ] -0I not in favor of this plan
>> [X] -1I am
Even the pushy non voting bastard (me) agrees that something should
come to the dev list.
I was pushing the daily digest thing coming to dev, but after
Christopher rationale (it takes work doing it + don't ask what you
won't do) I sure agree that the practical solution is to have all
the bugs
Whilst on the subject of JspC...does anyone know why no output is obtained when
you run it from the command line?
I am excecuting "java org.apache.jasper.JspC ..." and I never get any output!
Again, is this a bug, or intended behaviour?!
Many thanks,
Dave
Hello,
Does anyone know why JspC pre-compiles all jsp's, even if they have not changed?
I am using Ant to pre-compile and compile my jsps, and it is frustrating that
they are ALL pre-compiled every time.
Is this "intended behaviour" or a bug?
Many thanks,
Dave
I don't have a problem with dynamically registering the SSL provider in
SSLServerSocketFactory, as is done in the patch below. There was
actually some existing code in there which did that, but it was
commented out at some point. Does anyone know why?
Unless anyone objects, I'll include the dynam
-1 for the same reasons.
Amy
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
> "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> [ ] +1 - I want all messages to a new tomcat-bugs mailing list
> >> [X] -1 - I want all messages to tomcat-dev
> >
> > Rationale is: I want other developers to look at the outstanding bugs, a
"Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [ ] +1 - I want all messages to a new tomcat-bugs mailing list
>> [X] -1 - I want all messages to tomcat-dev
>
> Rationale is: I want other developers to look at the outstanding bugs, and
> tomcat-dev is the dev list for Tomcat, so I don't see the p
-- Forwarded Message
> From: "Holscher, David M" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 14:16:22 -0500
> To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: [Bug 3518] - Synchronization problem on startup
>
> I'll RC2 first thing Wednesday.
>
> ___
> Davi
> Hello All,
>
> [Super minor quibble]
>
> While migrating to the new catalina, I see that when starting it up from
> with my debugger (jbuilder4) that things won't run unless I set
> catalina.base. Since the batch files properly set catalina.base =
> cataline.home if catalina.base is included, i
> "Christopher Cain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Also, while I might technically have the ability to call for a vote on
> > anything, it's bad form to call a vote on something that you personally
> > cannot make happen. Since I do not have the ability to set up a new
> > mailing list, it woul
Hello All,
[Super minor quibble]
While migrating to the new catalina, I see that when starting it up from
with my debugger (jbuilder4) that things won't run unless I set
catalina.base. Since the batch files properly set catalina.base =
cataline.home if catalina.base is included, is there any
It itched me a lot that to enable SSL in TC4 a standard JDK has to be modified
(copy JSSE libs into jdk/jre/lib/ext and add
security.provider.3=com.sun.net.ssl.internal.ssl.Provider).
This was not necessary in TC 3.2.x because of different class loading
semantics.
In our environment jdks cannot
-- Forwarded Message
> From: "Holscher, David M" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 13:00:16 -0500
> To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: [Bug 3518] - Synchronization problem on startup
>
>> --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2001-09-10
>>
-- Forwarded Message
> From: Erich Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Organization: method park
> Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 19:45:46 +0200
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Bug 3515] - Processes hanging after stopping Tomcat
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/
"Christopher Cain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also, while I might technically have the ability to call for a vote on
> anything, it's bad form to call a vote on something that you personally
> cannot make happen. Since I do not have the ability to set up a new
> mailing list, it would be the eq
"GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> ++1! I didn't even know it existed anyplace other than JTC. I have
>> been supplying patches recently for it too. Also, having duplicate
>> code anyplace is just a bad idea. I am on a crusade to remove all
>> duplicate code from every code-base thro
Hello, I noticed the following behaviour using JDBC realms on tomcat 4.0-b7
running under windows-NT:
I have protected a directory. When I try to access it the login-form shows
up. After I have successfully logged in, the directory appears to be blank.
After I press the reload button on my browse
"Larry Isaacs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> = Tomcat 3.3 Final Release Plan Ballot =
> [ ] +1I am in favor of this plan, and will help
> [ ] +0I am in favor of this plan, but am unable to help
> [ ] -0I not in favor of this plan
> [ ] -1I am opposed to this plan, and my re
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
>
> "GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I would like to propose Ryan Bloom as commiter
> > in Tomcat, and particulary on jakarta-tomcat-connector.
> >
> > Ryan is one of the dev leader in Apache 2.0 and
> > contributed many patch for both mod_jk and mod_webapp,
remm01/09/10 11:39:37
Modified:jasper build.xml
Log:
- Add tools.jar to the list. That's needed for building without anything in the
system's
classpath.
Revision ChangesPath
1.20 +1 -1 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/jasper/build.xml
Index: build.xml
=
"GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to propose Ryan Bloom as commiter
> in Tomcat, and particulary on jakarta-tomcat-connector.
>
> Ryan is one of the dev leader in Apache 2.0 and
> contributed many patch for both mod_jk and mod_webapp,
> showing us that connectors avoid poli
keith 01/09/10 11:32:36
Modified:jk/java/org/apache/ajp Ajp13.java
jk/native/apache-1.3 mod_jk.c
jk/native/common jk_ajp_common.c jk_service.h jk_util.c
Log:
Port chunked encoding input support from jakarta-tomcat ajp13.
Revision ChangesPath
> Does this mean that the parser error under Windoze (which was preventing
> the transformation) has been resolved?
It appears to be working fine with Ant 1.4.
Remy
Does this mean that the parser error under Windoze (which was preventing
the transformation) has been resolved?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> craigmcc01/09/09 21:49:52
>
> Modified:.build.xml
>webapps build.xml
>webapps/ROOT build.xml index.html
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Keith Wannamaker wrote:
> I just finished merging all the chunked encoding
> support for ajp13 into j-t-c and was about to checkin.
> I'll hold off until we decide about this:
>
> | Henri - could we undo the ajp13.c changes, for example by copying the
> | current ajp13 from j
I just finished merging all the chunked encoding
support for ajp13 into j-t-c and was about to checkin.
I'll hold off until we decide about this:
| Henri - could we undo the ajp13.c changes, for example by copying the
| current ajp13 from j-t and re-doing the autoconf changes ? Having
Keith
On Monday 10 September 2001 10:23, Christopher Cain wrote:
Thanks for the vote of confidence everybody. I wasn't expecting
such a fast turn-around time on this. I'll try not to muck things
up too badly.
Ryan
> +1
>
> Welcome, Slick!
>
> - Christopher
>
> /**
> * Pleurez, pleurez, mes yeux,
remm01/09/10 10:52:45
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/realm
MemoryRealm.java
Log:
- Fix for bug 3524 (NPE in memory realm).
Revision ChangesPath
1.10 +15 -10
jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/re
remm01/09/10 10:42:51
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/loader
StandardClassLoader.java
Log:
- Apparently the URL class loader is not thread safe, so sync the call to the
superclass must be synced :-(
- Class loader gurus, please revie
I spent some quality time with emacs and merge, comparing j-t-c and j-t
versions of jk.
So far things look very good, all fixes in j-t seems to be already in
j-t-c. The only big difference ( that makes difficult to comapare ) is
ajp13, but it seems we are ok there.
Henri - could we undo the ajp1
Costin,
I think thats a good idea. I want it to work with all versions of TC (3.2.4,
3.3 and 4.0) and I will supply patches to their respective Service
implementations.
Dave
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED
Remy Maucherat wrote:
>
> > That is worse:
> >
> > Have a look to catalina/build.xml (lib/mail.jar).
> >
> > I will test and commit a better patch...
>
> What is the problem with that change (which I already committed) ?
No problem... Just my repository is some hours too old ;-). Next time I wi
Hi David,
I have another point I would like to add to the list: "do we have to
include it in the 'official' 3.3, or would it be better for it to be a
module ?"
Keep in mind that we have a relatively slow release cycle, and any feature
is adding more overhead for each release, and impose constrai
+1
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
>
> I would like to propose Ryan Bloom as commiter
> in Tomcat, and particulary on jakarta-tomcat-connector.
>
> Ryan is one of the dev leader in Apache 2.0 and
> contributed many patch for both mod_jk and mod_webapp,
> showing us that connectors avoid politics :)
>
> Vot
1 - 100 of 167 matches
Mail list logo
