Asad Habib wrote:
.NET and PHP may have better development/deployment environments, but
quite frankly I would rather use Java than C# or PHP to develop web
applications. Just look at the robust Java open-source frameworks that
exist (i.e. Spring, Turbine, Struts, JSF) just to name a few. Also, .N
To re-start tomcat, I start a second instance running on a different port and
after the second instance is running, change the port forwarding to activate
it.
> If so is there an advantage to doing that over clustering?
It's a simple configuration that only requires one machine.
As nice as clu
.NET and PHP may have better development/deployment environments, but
quite frankly I would rather use Java than C# or PHP to develop web
applications. Just look at the robust Java open-source frameworks that
exist (i.e. Spring, Turbine, Struts, JSF) just to name a few. Also, .NET
applications are
Allistair Crossley wrote:
we used to just schedule updates and let all our staff know there would be a
small amount of downtime (for our intranet) but you can't do this on external
production servers, so you need to go with either load balancing/clustering
that allows you to close a node down
Mikolaj Rydzewski wrote:
Seth Ladd wrote:
The frequency is so much that the uptime of all of our applications is
affected as we continually take down Tomcat servers in production to
deploy a new application (or new version of the application). Because
hot deploy does not work (the old favori
Sorry still not following. If Tomcat is being restarted how do you not
have start up time? Is it that you have two instances of Tocmat and you
are having the firewall just point to one instance while you bounce the
second?
If so is there an advantage to doing that over clustering?
George
The net effect is that users have to re-login, but there is no down time. They
get bounced, but can immediately log back in.
Right now, startup time for my hosted machine is running in the area of 5
minutes. So, I'm eliminating a 5 minute startup cycle.
I'm running 60 virtual hosts on one machi
Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: Advice for Hosting Many Individual Webapps?
>
>
>
> I think I missed something here. Are you not still bouncing Tomcat
> here? If so isnt the service still going down? What is the
> benifit of
> changign the ports around? I h
Seth Ladd wrote:
The frequency is so much that the uptime of all of our applications is
affected as we continually take down Tomcat servers in production to
deploy a new application (or new version of the application). Because
hot deploy does not work (the old favorite OOM error w/ too many
I think I missed something here. Are you not still bouncing Tomcat
here? If so isnt the service still going down? What is the benifit of
changign the ports around? I have a feeling I missed something in the
expliation.
George Sexton wrote:
The technique I use is this:
Run the HTTP con
My solution for this is not elegant. I run 8 apps on one instance of
Tomcat and it will be growing to 12 soon. All of those apps are set
with autoReload set to true. When I need to update something I
manually copy the individual class or JSP file to the proper folder to
over write the exis
Hi,
I very often deploy client's applications in multiple tomcat instances.
It is normal and each application does not affect another. You just need
a strong multiprocessor server with a lot of memory to sustain the last
:) The only difference is that I often configure a separate apache
instance f
The technique I use is this:
Run the HTTP connector on port 8080.
Forward port 80 to port 8080.
To re-start the system:
edit the server.xml and run the HTTP connector on port 7080
Change the shutdown port to 8006
Start tomcat, and wait till it comes up.
Re-run the firewall script to forward p
13 matches
Mail list logo
