The log output shows that you have pam_tally or pam_tally2 in your pam
configuration. The preinst fails in order to save you from upgrading
and breaking your system, leaving you with a configuration referencing
an obsolete pam module.
The message says:
you are using pam_tally or pam_tally2 in y
packages in launchpad always build against -proposed. How are you
building this that you're not getting the systemd in proposed?
** Tags removed: regression-release
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in
$ git tag --contains 85c975df2c2
v9.1
v9.2
v9.3
v9.4
$ git tag --contains 92cb8427c53
v9.1
v9.2
v9.3
v9.4
$
Ubuntu 23.10 includes coreutils 9.1, 24.04 LTS will include coreutils
9.4. So this bug is fixed in the latest release of Ubuntu.
** Changed in: coreutils (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed
> This is a significant difference and for a workload we intend to remain as a
> core tested
> and tracked workload. As such I propose we re-introduce core22 and snapd
> snaps to our seed.
I disagree that the image should be optimized by default to prioritize
the one-time startup performance of
You say "Nick's preference", but it's Nick who took the position here
that the default behavior should not change?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2019026
Tit
tmp -type f -mtime +30 | wc -l
130319
$ sudo find /tmp -atime +30 | wc -l
8
$ sudo find /tmp -ctime +30 | wc -l
744
$
So at least on desktop I have something that is regularly changing
ctime/atime on the contents of /tmp and therefore preventing them from being
garbage collected...
--
Ste
On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 06:51:46PM -, Philip Roche wrote:
> @vorlon @jchittum @paelzer given the above findings are you still -1 on
> any snap preseeding? Based on the data, I vote not to preseed any snaps.
That is my position. Thanks for bringing data to this!
--
You received this bug noti
Belated response, but just for the record, Paride's recounting of upstream's
position in the context of the Debian decision was definitive for me:
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 11:47:56AM -, Paride Legovini wrote:
> Back in the day I asked upstream their take on irqbalance usefulness
> with newer ke
** Changed in: base-files (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode (juliank)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to base-files in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054925
Title:
Debootstra
What is the rationale for a gpg package pulling in an MTA at all? I
think this needs assessed.
** Changed in: gnupg2 (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https:
** Tags added: rls-nn-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to base-files in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054925
Title:
Debootstrap fails for Noble with base-files 13ubuntu7
Status in base-files
On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 07:13:30PM -, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> Steve - it is a server package for hosting a web key server, it's
> entirely reasonable for it to depend on a mail transport agent. A WKS
> server, upon uploading a key, sends confirmation emails to the UIDs in
> the key, before
i386 is not supported as a standalone architecture in Ubuntu.
** Changed in: kbd (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to kbd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2052399
** Description changed:
[Impact]
The last couple of days, I have been unable to run a successful debootstrap
for Noble Numbat.
Apparently this is caused by the addition of symlinks (/bin, /lib,
/lib64 and /sbin) in base-files 13ubuntu7. According to debootstrap.log,
it fails to extra
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 10:19:40AM -, Frank Heimes wrote:
> Fix Committed with having:
> pam | 1.5.3-4ubuntu1 | noble-proposed | source
FTR this has been temporarily reverted, but it will be fix-committed again
shortly
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun
The verification of the Stable Release Update for debootstrap has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encount
** Tags added: rls-nn-incoming
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Nick Rosbrook (enr0n)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055806
T
I've sponsored this for noble. For the SRUs, I would like to see a test
case explicitly included that says you will regression-test this on
other bluetooth pairings on other devices: the patch is not a platform-
specific quirk, it is a change to generic bluetooth code, so there
should be explicit
FFe granted
** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056496
Title:
[FFe] AppArmor 4.0-beta2 + promp
** Package changed: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu) => ubuntu-raspi-settings
(Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057822
Title:
Removing irqbalance disables p
mesa bootstrap had not been unwound all the way. Fixed mesa is building
now.
** Package changed: auto-multiple-choice (Ubuntu) => mesa (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: mesa (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
** Changed in: mesa (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Steve Langase
Public bug reported:
click 0.5.2-2 is stuck in -proposed. autopkgtest now fails on armhf,
and possibly on all archs.
armhf binary will be removed from the release pocket.
** Affects: click (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: update-excuse
** Description changed:
[1724567.629003] audit: type=1400 audit(1711133926.877:813):
apparmor="DENIED" operation="file_mmap" class="file"
namespace="root//lxd-noble-armhf_"
profile="/usr/sbin/cups-browsed" name="/usr/sbin/cups-browsed"
pid=876865 comm="cups-browsed" requested_mask="rm" denied_mask="rm"
fsuid=1000110 ouid=
788055 comm="cups-browsed" requested_mask="r" denied_mask="r"
fsuid=1000110 ouid=100
So this is a regression wrt cups-browsed running under apparmor in a
container, and not specific to armhf.
** Changed in: cups-browsed (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecid
cupsd 2.0.0-0ubuntu8 contains no sourceful changes vs 2.0.0-0ubuntu3 in
noble release; these are no-change rebuilds only.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058
On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 05:16:57AM -, John Johansen wrote:
> Do we know if there is a difference in the kernel between the runs?
> The 2.0.0.0~0ubuntu3 autopackage run log I was pointed at was on a
> Linux 5.4.0-170-generic #188-Ubuntu
> Do we know what kernel that 2.0.0-0ubuntu7 is failing
Thanks! Since this issue was seen only with the package in -proposed,
I'm closing this bug.
There are other unrelated test failures now blocking the build on
armhf. I will open a separate bug for these.
** Changed in: cups-browsed (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
** Change
privoxy rebuild fails in containers with the same issue.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058866
Title:
proposed-migration for cups-browsed 2.0.0-0ubuntu8
Public bug reported:
multiple cups-related packages are having test failures on armhf after time_t
transition.
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/c/c2esp/noble/armhf
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups-browsed/2.0.0-0ubuntu9
I am suspecting a common cups-based issue.
cups-browsed alr
marking critical because these packages are being allowed into the
release pocket as-is but the printing stack may be broken, which is of
high importance in a server/embedded context.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscrib
** Description changed:
- click 0.5.2-2 is stuck in -proposed. autopkgtest now fails on ppc64el,
- s390x.
+ click 0.5.2-2 is stuck in -proposed. autopkgtest now fails on all archs
+ except amd64.
In order to be able to run the tests without all-proposed=1, glib 2.0 is
needed, which is why
c2esp autopkgtest still fails with the current cups in noble-proposed -
though it appears to fail differently now.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to cups in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059157
Title:
avahi-autoipd still depends on it. But I was sure I uploaded avahi to
drop it?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to isc-dhcp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058242
Title:
Demote isc-dhcp to universe
anyway, this doesn't need an ubuntu-archive bug, it just needs the
dependency removed.
** Package changed: isc-dhcp (Ubuntu) => avahi (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: avahi (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded
packages are provided on i386 only if they are required for binary
compatibility.
** Changed in: nano (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to nano in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launc
Since this bug report was filed, there has been a security update of
gst-plugins-good1.0 in jammy which built successfully. Closing invalid.
** Changed in: gst-plugins-good1.0 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch se
The noble release pocket is currently in an inconsistent state because
of rebuilds for CVE-2024-3094. This is not a bug in the pam package.
** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2024-3094
** Changed in: pam (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug
** Changed in: c2esp (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to cups in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059157
Title:
proposed-migration for cups 2.4.7-1.2ubuntu1
** Changed in: c2esp (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to cups in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059281
Title:
libcupsfilters 2.0.0-0ubuntu6 results in aut
This looks like a good fix to have for 24.04 release but does not look
beta-critical.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059796
Title:
Other Softw
This is targeted to 24.04 and marked as 'in progress' but is definitely
not landing before 24.04 GA on Thursday. What is the overall plan here?
should this go to SRU? (It can, but in that case doesn't benefit users
wrt the corruption issue in the *installer* until 24.04.1.)
--
You received this
recent discussion out-of-band suggested this might have been a rpi-
specific failure, is that accurate?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libcanberra in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060693
Title:
N
** Changed in: webkit2gtk (Ubuntu)
Milestone: ubuntu-24.04 => noble-updates
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2037015
Title:
Screen corruption of webkit2gtk
> ⚠️ Only land this in the release pocket after PPAs have been resigned
I am marking this incomplete, as it is unclear to me what the intended
timeline is for the resigning, or if your comment about the release
pocket should also apply to -updates.
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Noble)
Status:
Hello Leó, or anyone else affected,
Accepted software-properties into noble-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-
properties/0.99.49 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
If there's any bug in Ubuntu here, it's that the release upgrader didn't
try harder to get the system into a consistent state before offering a
reboot. No bug in pam, which is simply one of the packages to be
upgraded.
libpam-modules refused to be upgraded because there were references to
obsolet
Please include as part of the test plan a check that:
- there are no new binary dependencies introduced in the package
- systemd-cryptenroll doesn't have any undefined symbols that prevent it from
running (a simple 'systemd-cryptenroll --help' suffices for this)
- non-TPM use cases of systemd-cryp
ubuntu-meta (1.468) hirsute; urgency=medium
* Refreshed dependencies
* Added media-types to standard
* Removed mime-support from standard
-- Steve Langasek Fri, 16 Apr 2021
21:52:27 +
This dependency was removed a year before this bug report was filed?
** Changed in: ubuntu-meta
The isc-dhcp-client dependency exists to ensure support for network
configuration from within an initramfs, for which systemd-networkd is
not currently a replacement since we don't run systemd in the initramfs.
See also https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-
devel/2022-May/042080.html ff regard
> As a component of GNOME core,
How do I confirm that this is the case?
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/GNOME points to
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-build-
meta/-/tree/master/elements/core which does not list it. It does not
appear in the discourse discussion at
https://disco
** Also affects: evolution (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Hello Lukas, or anyone else affected,
Accepted systemd into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/249.11-0ubuntu3.3 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://
Hello Alejandro, or anyone else affected,
Accepted systemd into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/249.11-0ubuntu3.3 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
http
Hello Nick, or anyone else affected,
Accepted systemd into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/249.11-0ubuntu3.3 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://w
Hello Dean, or anyone else affected,
Accepted systemd into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/249.11-0ubuntu3.3 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://w
> "libssl3", but fortunately that one is already installed by default,
> so should still be fine.
For changes to so fundamental of a package, I think we want to be
careful to have a higher standard than just "installed by default".
In fact it is not possible to remove libssl3 from a jammy system
Hello Matthias, or anyone else affected,
Accepted icu into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/icu/70.1-2ubuntu1 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.ubun
Public bug reported:
Looking at memory utilization in a pristine Ubuntu lxd container (top -o
RES), I see that ModemManager is running, which I was surprised to see
is present at all in the stock image.
Tracking this I find that fwupd depends on libmm-glib0, which in turn
Recommends: modemmanager
I've also just discovered that in addition to the second-largest running
process (ModemManager), fwupd is responsible for the third-largest
running process (udisksd). Perhaps it would be expedient to revisit the
inclusion of fwupd in the seed used for cloud and container images?
--
You received
> For the first time, I made failures in the build tests for most of gstreamer
> fail the build for amd64 & arm64. I did this to try to better comply
> with the SRU guidelines.
I appreciate this; it's not required by any means but it is a welcome
improvement.
> There is longstanding precedent fo
impish has gone EOL without any further security updates to openssh,
therefore I am removing this package from -proposed and closing this bug
wontfix as part of the EOL process.
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu Impish)
Status: Fix Committed => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification
This package has now been dropped, the rationale for a separate source
package no longer applies. This will be integrated into alsa-plugins
directly.
** Changed in: alsa-plugins-extra (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Won't Fix
** Also affects: alsa-plugins (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
** Changed in: alsa-plugins (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Changed in: alsa-plugins (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Steve Langasek (vorlon)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed t
Public bug reported:
On a default idle Ubuntu kinetic container, the second largest process
by resident memory is '/usr/share/unattended-upgrades/unattended-
upgrade-shutdown --wait-for-signal'.
We want unattended-upgrades to be installed by default in all container
images, but this process is he
fwupd it happens pulls in not only ModemManager but also udisks2, so
there are two daemons running in every container as a result of fwupd's
presence.
Having discussed with the CPC team, it doesn't make sense to include
fwupd in any cloud or container images, unless there's a particular
partner im
** Also affects: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: modemmanager (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: fwupd (Ubunt
The message in the terminal output explains that pam_tally is obsolete,
and must be replaced in your config before you can upgrade.
Did you use do-release-upgrade for this upgrade or was it manual?
** Changed in: pam (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notificatio
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1977493 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1977493
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1977493
Upgrade from Ubuntu 21.10 to 22.04 fails - unmet dependencies: libpam-modules
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu
This fix was incomplete; because all of these packages were installed as
part of a task (ubuntu-server), they are all marked as manually
installed. So additional changes are needed to remove the packages
pulled in by fwupd.
** Changed in: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released => In P
** Changed in: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1981109
Title:
server image pulls in M
Hello bugproxy, or anyone else affected,
Accepted htslib into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/htslib/1.10.2-3ubuntu0.1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https:/
Hello bugproxy, or anyone else affected,
Accepted zlib into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zlib/1:1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu1.4 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
http
** Package changed: busybox (Ubuntu Jammy) => isc-dhcp (Ubuntu Jammy)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to isc-dhcp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1937110
Title:
dhcp option 121 & 249
Status in subiq
(Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Steve Langasek (vorlon)
** Changed in: isc-dhcp (Ubuntu Jammy)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Steve Langasek (vorlon)
** Changed in: isc-dhcp (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are
Hello Pedro, or anyone else affected,
Accepted isc-dhcp into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/isc-
dhcp/4.4.1-2.3ubuntu2.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
http
The question regarding partner usage of dhclient is in progress
elsewhere and does not block this SRU.
** Changed in: isc-dhcp (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: Incomplete => Fix Committed
** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy
--
You received this bug notification because you
Hello bugproxy, or anyone else affected,
Accepted bedtools into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bedtools/2.30.0+dfsg-2ubuntu0.1 in
a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. Se
Hello bugproxy, or anyone else affected,
Accepted zlib into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zlib/1:1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu9.1 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
http
This does not look like an Ubuntu bug. You have the most recent jammy
version of dpkg installed on your system according to your bug report,
however the upgrade failure shows an internal error when trying to
invoke 'dpkg --valiate-version' from dpkg-maintscript-helper.
What does `which dpkg` retu
Someone needs to update gst-plugins-bad1.0 to not depend on this before
the removal can proceed.
** Also affects: cog (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: gst-plugins-bad1.0 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: wpewebkit (Ubuntu)
I don't believe MIR is required for binary packages unless they have
been excluded from main for a reason as part of a prior MIR. You should
only need to seed it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to krb5 in Ubuntu
This bug report lacks the 'Where problems could occur' section of the
SRU bug template.
** Changed in: sudo (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: Fix Committed => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to sudo in Ubu
Hello Jeremy, or anyone else affected,
Accepted evolution-data-server into jammy-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution-data-
server/3.44.4-0ubuntu1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing thi
Hello Sergio, or anyone else affected,
Accepted openldap into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/2.5.13+dfsg-0ubuntu0.22.04.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
The version of shadow in the proposed pocket of Xenial that was
purported to fix this bug report has been removed because the bugs that
were to be fixed by the upload were not verified in a timely (105 days)
fashion.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch s
The version of shadow in the proposed pocket of Xenial that was
purported to fix this bug report has been removed because the bugs that
were to be fixed by the upload were not verified in a timely (105 days)
fashion.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch s
The version of shadow in the proposed pocket of Xenial that was
purported to fix this bug report has been removed because the bugs that
were to be fixed by the upload were not verified in a timely (105 days)
fashion.
** Tags removed: verification-needed-xenial
** Changed in: shadow (Ubuntu Xenial
The version of shadow in the proposed pocket of Xenial that was
purported to fix this bug report has been removed because the bugs that
were to be fixed by the upload were not verified in a timely (105 days)
fashion.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch s
An upload of isc-dhcp to jammy-proposed has been rejected from the
upload queue for the following reason: "reuploading with the correct fix
from kinetic".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to isc-dhcp in Ubuntu.
htt
No, this is only about removing it from container and cloud images.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1981109
Title:
server image pulls in ModemManager vi
Removing packages from kinetic:
cog 0.14.0-1 in kinetic
cog 0.14.0-1 in kinetic amd64
cog 0.14.0-1 in kinetic arm64
cog 0.14.0-1 in kinetic armhf
cog 0.14.0-1 in kinetic ppc64el
cog 0.14.0-1 in kinetic riscv64
(and blacklisted)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gst-plugins-bad1.0 in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1981592
Title:
Please remove wpewebkit and block syncs from Debian
Status in cog package in Ub
Removing packages from kinetic:
wpewebkit 2.36.6-1 in kinetic
libwpewebkit-1.0-doc 2.36.6-1 in kinetic amd64
libwpewebkit-1.0-doc 2.36.6-1 in kinetic arm64
libwpewebkit-1.0-doc 2.36.6-1 in kinetic armhf
libwpewebkit-1.0-doc 2.3
An upload of apport to jammy-proposed has been rejected from the upload
queue for the following reason: "contains bugfixes without bug
references or test cases, does not meet SRU policy".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subs
An upload of apport to jammy-proposed has been rejected from the upload
queue for the following reason: "contains bugfixes without bug
references or test cases, does not meet SRU policy".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subs
An upload of apport to jammy-proposed has been rejected from the upload
queue for the following reason: "contains bugfixes without bug
references or test cases, does not meet SRU policy".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subs
An upload of apport to jammy-proposed has been rejected from the upload
queue for the following reason: "contains bugfixes without bug
references or test cases, does not meet SRU policy".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subs
An upload of apport to jammy-proposed has been rejected from the upload
queue for the following reason: "contains bugfixes without bug
references or test cases, does not meet SRU policy".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subs
An upload of apport to jammy-proposed has been rejected from the upload
queue for the following reason: "contains bugfixes without bug
references or test cases, does not meet SRU policy".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subs
An upload of apport to jammy-proposed has been rejected from the upload
queue for the following reason: "contains bugfixes without bug
references or test cases, does not meet SRU policy".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subs
1 - 100 of 3358 matches
Mail list logo
