RE: Re:Re: [TruthTalk] Yes, to claim the law is not a curse is to sin

2003-02-13 Thread ShieldsFamily
Not in the Revised Gary Edition. (RGE) In that edition, sleeping with your daughters comes under the heading of walking with God, and not being under the Law. :-) Izzy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Terry Clifton Sent: Wednesday,

RE: Re:Re: [TruthTalk] Yes, to claim the law is not a curse is to sin

2003-02-13 Thread Charles P. Locke
Hi Izzy. I was on your family website, and read your statement of faith, which, of course, is a reprint of that of your church. I was particulary interested in whether that statement mentioned that Christians are under the law or under grace, i.e., under the old covenant or the new covenant.

Re: [TruthTalk] Yes, to claim the law is not a curse is to sin

2003-02-13 Thread ttxpress
Gen 6:9 On Thu, 13 Feb 2003 00:38:45 + "Charles P. Locke" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:the verse that tells about Noah walking withGod?

Re: Re: [TruthTalk] Yes, to claim the law is not a curse is to sin

2003-02-13 Thread ttxpress
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003 00:42:24 + "Charles P. Locke" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:"when did Noah get drunk and sleep with his offspring " apologies for the confusion--sorry, my bad -- regardless, the main point endures--(already 'righteous') Noah didn't gain from following laws and he knew

RE: Re:Re: [TruthTalk] Yes, to claim the law is not a curse is to sin

2003-02-13 Thread ShieldsFamily
Perry, Obviously I am saved by the grace of God through faith in the shed Blood of Jesus Christ. Not one thing I do can erase a single sin from my life. She who is forgiven much, loves much, and I have been forgiven of much! I never claimed to be under the Law as you and your

Re: [TruthTalk] Yes, to claim the law is not a curse is to sin

2003-02-13 Thread Charles P. Locke
Thanks. I read right over it. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Yes, to claim the law is not a curse is to sin Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 08:07:44 -0700 Gen 6:9 On Thu, 13 Feb 2003 00:38:45 + Charles P. Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Re:Re: [TruthTalk] Yes, to claim the law is not a curse is to sin

2003-02-13 Thread Charles P. Locke
Izzy, Thanks for the response. My mother has been a quilter since I was a tyke, and my wife has recently taken up quilting. I look forward to seeing them on you website. I agree with most that you say, and am not really itching-for-an-argument. There are several in this group that feel

Re: Re:Re: [TruthTalk] Yes, to claim the law is not a curse is to sin

2003-02-13 Thread ttxpress
the title of the thread, above, captures the dark side of the issue--which plagues legalism; let's not stray too far from the topic e.g., re: below, but what do you do when you 'disobey'? unfortunately 'righteous' but law abidin' Noah cursed his family (partic Ham) why not repent(?); God

RE: Re:Re: [TruthTalk] Yes, to claim the law is not a curse is to sin

2003-02-13 Thread ShieldsFamily
Of course I repent when I sin. Is that the question? Izzy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 12:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Re:Re: [TruthTalk] Yes, to claim the law

RE: Re:Re: [TruthTalk] Yes, to claim the law is not a curse is to sin

2003-02-13 Thread ShieldsFamily
PS; Your wife and I need to talk! (about quilting; not you!) Izzy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Charles P. Locke Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 11:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Re:Re: [TruthTalk] Yes, to claim the law is

RE: Re:Re: [TruthTalk] Yes, to claim the law is not a curse is to sin

2003-02-13 Thread Charles P. Locke
I live in Corona...if you take the 10 east out of PS, to Hwy 91, then go about 25 miles on the 91 S (to the Interstate 15 intersection) you are in Corona. I am 35 minutes from Newport Beach. From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE:

RE: Re:Re: [TruthTalk] Yes, to claim the law is not a curse is to sin

2003-02-13 Thread ShieldsFamily
I AM NOT THE LEAST BIT JEALOUS. :-) How did you get so darned lucky to live there Izzy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Charles P. Locke Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 1:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Re:Re: [TruthTalk]

Re: Re:Re: [TruthTalk] Yes, to claim the law is not a curse is to sin

2003-02-13 Thread ttxpress
ask DavidM On Thu, 13 Feb 2003 12:35:30 -0600 "ShieldsFamily" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Of course I repent when I sin. Is that the question? Izzy -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]glory.org [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent:

Re: [TruthTalk] Yes, to claim the law is not a curse is to sin

2003-02-13 Thread CHamm56114
In a message dated 2/13/2003 10:04:15 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Perry, Obviously I am saved by the grace of God through faith in the shed Blood of Jesus Christ. Not one thing I do can erase a single sin from my life. "She who is forgiven much, loves much," and I have

Re: [TruthTalk] Yes, to claim the law is not a curse is to sin

2003-02-12 Thread Marlin Halverson
I cannot help your enmity against God's law. Because the carnal mind [is] enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be.ROM 8:7 You will either love Him, or your own image of Him which is idolatry. Little children, keep yourselves from idols.

RE: [TruthTalk] Yes, to claim the law is not a curse is to sin

2003-02-12 Thread ShieldsFamily
g, What does that mean to you? That they took walks together? How do you interpret that? Izzy -Original Message- that Noah walked with God

Re:Re: [TruthTalk] Yes, to claim the law is not a curse is to sin

2003-02-12 Thread ttxpress
..[your] carnal mind is enmity against God..--Marlin to g ok, maybe it is or, perhaps, was; however, i doubt anyones' mind is/was more or less carnal than Noah's and Noah did not gain from following laws think about it, e.G.: when did Noah get drunk and sleep with his offspring (acc to

RE: [TruthTalk] Yes, to claim the law is not a curse is to sin

2003-02-12 Thread Charles P. Locke
Can someone refer me to the verse that tells about Noah walking with God? I remember that Adam did, and Enoch did, but I don't remember reading that Noah did. Perry From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Yes, to claim

Re:Re: [TruthTalk] Yes, to claim the law is not a curse is to sin

2003-02-12 Thread Charles P. Locke
Wasn't that Lot that got drunk and slept with his daughters? Didn't Noah just expose his nakedness? I need a scripture reference for when did Noah get drunk and sleep with his offspring please. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re:Re:

Re: Re:Re: [TruthTalk] Yes, to claim the law is not a curse is to sin

2003-02-12 Thread Terry Clifton
Charles: It was Lot, not Noah. Terry - Original Message - From: Charles P. Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 6:42 PM Subject: Re:Re: [TruthTalk] Yes, to claim the law is not a curse is to sin Wasn't that Lot that got drunk and slept with

Re: [TruthTalk] Yes, to claim the law is not a curse is to sin

2003-02-11 Thread Terry Clifton
All God's instructions to Christians are in the Holy Bible. If it is not there, I would advise you to fergedaboudit. Terry - Original Message - From: Charles P. Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 10:08 PM Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Yes, to

Re: [TruthTalk] Yes, to claim the law is not a curse is to sin

2003-02-11 Thread Charles P. Locke
The book does not state whether it is pre- or ante- deluvial, but mentioned that the Noahide Law is also called the Seven Laws of the Sons of Noah in the Talmudic and Midrashic sources. This might suggest that it is antediluvial. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL

Re: [TruthTalk] Yes, to claim the law is not a curse is to sin

2003-02-11 Thread David Miller
g wrote: which side of the deluge did this come from? The Noahide laws were deduced from a study of Gen. 9, which would be after the deluge. This is the first time we find murder being a capital offense. Peace be with you. David Miller, Beverly Hills, Florida USA -- Let your speech

Re: [TruthTalk] Yes, to claim the law is not a curse is to sin

2003-02-11 Thread Terry Clifton
Ah, I am not certain that I get your point,but Paul tells us that the OT has value for us all. It is all about the Jews, but it is also about a promised savior. If it (OT) were not important, Matthew would not have started with the geneology of Jesus. To me, every word in The Word is

RE: [TruthTalk] Yes, to claim the law is not a curse is to sin

2003-02-11 Thread ShieldsFamily
Galatians 3 29 And if (1) you belong to Christ, then you are Abraham's descendants, heirs according to (2) promise. Izzy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Charles P. Locke Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 7:58 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [TruthTalk] Yes, to claim the law is not a curse is to sin

2003-02-11 Thread ShieldsFamily
Amen, Terry. Izzy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Terry Clifton Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 3:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Yes, to claim the law is not a curse is to sin Ah, I am not

Re: [TruthTalk] Yes, to claim the law is not a curse is to sin

2003-02-11 Thread Charles P. Locke
I do not at all downplay the importance of the OT, but throughout the NT the new covenant is mentioned by Christ, and discussed extensively by the Apostles. When there is a new covenant the old covenant disappears (Heb 8:13), does it not? Why have a new covenant if nothing has changed from the

Re: [TruthTalk] Yes, to claim the law is not a curse is to sin

2003-02-11 Thread Terry Clifton
Hey Marlin. I cannot believe it. We actually agree on something! Terry Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Yes, to claim the law is not a curse is to sin The Jews are only one of several tribes originating from the seed ofAbraham! The "OT" is a history of the origins of all people, from Adamonward,

Re: [TruthTalk] Yes, to claim the law is not a curse is to sin

2003-02-11 Thread ttxpress
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003 10:36:31 -0500 "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: g wrote: ..which side of the deluge did this come from? [DavidM:]The Noahide laws were deduced from a study of Gen. 9, which would be after the deluge. Then,as the Apostles argue (correctly) about themselves

Re: [TruthTalk] Yes, to claim the law is not a curse is to sin

2003-02-11 Thread Marlin Halverson
What a gift the law is! It clearly defines evil. But, with or without the written law, men have always been responsible for knowing in his conscience good and evil. Men have chosen evil to their own hurt. GEN 3:22 ΒΆ And the LORD God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know

Re: [TruthTalk] Yes, to claim the law is not a curse is to sin

2003-02-11 Thread Marlin Halverson
The old covenant promissed the new covenant, therefore the latter is the result of the former, but with better promisses. We are not only promissed long life for obedience, but eternal life. We are not only promissed blessings and persecutions in this life for obedience, but in the life to come,

Re: [TruthTalk] Yes, to claim the law is not a curse is to sin

2003-02-11 Thread ttxpress
that Noah walked with God ain't good enough for you, Marlin(?); what are you tryin' to do, be more Christian than Christ? On Tue, 11 Feb 2003 22:32:27 -0500 "Marlin Halverson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What a gift the law is!

Re: [TruthTalk] Yes, to claim the law is not a curse is to sin

2003-02-10 Thread Marlin Halverson
When was the Sabbath created? - Original Message - From: Charles P. Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 10:08 PM Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Yes, to claim the law is not a curse is to sin I posted this some time ago, and thought some who have