Foundation backing up the community and
ensuring its independence. That would guarantee (or would try to) that the
project is not dependant on a single company the way that has happened (and is
happening) in similar projects.
--
Albert Cervera i Areny
http://www.NaN-tic.com
OpenERP Partners
Tel: +3
*not* have more power
in the decision making process. At the same time, with each release, the
Foundation can publish a small set of statistics showing who has contributed
what. For example: "For this release B2CK has contributed 2000 lines of code
and 400 words in documentation, etc"
[1]
A Dissabte, 16 d'abril de 2011 01:39:11, Albert Cervera i Areny va escriure:
> For example, in KDE e.v [1] they have the rule that in order for a new
> member to be accepted it be proposed by three existing members, and voted
> by the whole of them [2]. I think (maybe I'm w
> > events.
>
> I guess our current size itself is good enough for development sprints. We
> got to start with what we are now to be a big community. The sprints which
> happen with conferences like pycon and europython have lesser participants.
> Infact at pycon 2011 it got so crazy that there were more sprints than
> participants [1]. But all these sprints build a better and strong community
> and definitely better working software.
>
> > --
> > Nicolas Évrard
> >
> > B2CK SPRL
> > rue de Rotterdam, 4
> > 4000 Liège
> > Belgium
> > Tel: +32 472 54 46 59
> > E-mail/Jabber: nicolas.evr...@b2ck.com
> > Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
> >
> > --
> > tryton@googlegroups.com mailing list
>
> [1] http://twitter.com/#!/mitsuhiko/status/47029598667542528
> <http://twitter.com/#!/mitsuhiko/status/47029598667542528>
--
Albert Cervera i Areny
http://www.NaN-tic.com
OpenERP Partners
Tel: +34 93 553 18 03
skype: nan-oficina
http://twitter.com/albertnan
http://www.nan-tic.com/blog
--
tryton@googlegroups.com mailing list
A Diumenge, 17 d'abril de 2011 12:18:33, Cédric Krier va escriure:
> On 17/04/11 12:11 +0200, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
> > I would like to start a wiki page in order to write down everybody's
> > opinion on how the Foundation should be organized. I'd also like
;Hold the Tryton brand." (I'm not sure this is
the right expression, please feel free to change it to proper English :-).
--
Albert Cervera i Areny
http://www.NaN-tic.com
OpenERP Partners
Tel: +34 93 553 18 03
skype: nan-oficina
http://twitter.com/albertnan
http://www.nan-tic.com/blog
--
tryton@googlegroups.com mailing list
menu overview
> dirty. A customer unfolding the submenu lasts the same time than
> double clicking the record view.
I agree.
--
Albert Cervera i Areny
http://www.NaN-tic.com
OpenERP Partners
Tel: +34 93 553 18 03
skype: nan-oficina
http://twitter.com/albertnan
http://www.nan-tic.com/b
sing the GPL license. You would not be forced
to that license if you created an application which communicated with Tryton
using the RPC interface.
--
Albert Cervera i Areny
http://www.NaN-tic.com
OpenERP Partners
Tel: +34 93 553 18 03
http://twitter.com/albertnan
http://www.nan-tic.com/blog
--
tryton@googlegroups.com mailing list
the foundation rules
> :-)
Also, there are other tricks that could be used. Sometimes owners create more
than one "legal" company for fiscal reasons, so a company could have more than
one voice if they wanted to have more votes.
However, we should try to minimize those worries by making t
accepted just because there's no other member of the
foundation from that country. It should be accepted because he/she is commited
to the project. (Unless members decide otherwise :)
--
Albert Cervera i Areny
http://www.NaN-tic.com
OpenERP Partners
Tel: +34 93 553 18 03
http://twitter
d access for default user
> > on sales, purchases and invoices. And give it to only users in the "Sale
> > Group" and/or "Purchase Group" and/or "Invoice Group"?
>
> As already stated on the review: +1 for permissions by groups.
+1
--
Alber
another one may be sponsor but not member. The thing is that
if companies were allowed to be members, should they have the same vote than
individuals? I think it should be this way.
--
Albert Cervera i Areny
http://www.NaN-tic.com
OpenERP Partners
Tel: +34 93 553 18 03
http://twitter.com/
mation regarding production planning should probably go
to this model instead of (or apart from) the higher level production order
itself.
We've also found cases in which one would need (or benefit from) such low-level
production. Cases in which you don't need or want a production order
A Dimecres, 29 de juny de 2011 13:12:19, Cédric Krier va escriure:
> On 29/06/11 13:06 +0200, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
> > A Dimecres, 29 de juny de 2011 12:36:49, Jordi Esteve va escriure:
> > > As I said before, we have a similar opinion, one puts more emphasis in
>
oduction order model, but
from the experience of OpenERP that one has too many things for some simple
cases.
Also the fact that a production order has several subproductions (if we want
to call it that way) is very usual so that should be also easily doable (again
it's important that the
tions. There are companies that work on a per project basis and each one
would have different materials. Forcing users to create a BoM first is not
ideal
for them.
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manufacturing
--
Albert Cervera i Areny
http://www.NaN-tic.com
OpenERP Partners
Tel: +34 93
ny
> more about my neutral position. I'm thinking that existing foundations
> already have these details sorted (they've been around for years after
> all). So again, the question (which remains unanswered) is, why 'yet
> another' foundation?
>From my point of
the comming new improvement of the client (especially the window
> manager [1]), I think finally it is a good idea to remove those "New" menu
> entries because like "nothmann" said it is duplicate functionnality with
> the toolbar.
>
> What do you think about?
+1
--
Albert Cervera i Areny
http://www.NaN-tic.com
OpenERP Partners
Tel: +34 93 553 18 03
http://twitter.com/albertnan
http://www.nan-tic.com/blog
--
tryton@googlegroups.com mailing list
http://www.opt.be/informations/inns_liege__auberge_de_jeunesse_georges_sim
> enon/en/HJ/21502.html
> http://www.accorhotels.com/gb/hotel-1893-hotel-mercure-liege-centre/index.
> shtml http://www.hotelunivers.be/english/
--
Albert Cervera i Areny
http://www.NaN-tic.com
Tel: +34 93 553 18 03
http://twitter.com/albertnan
http://www.nan-tic.com/blog
--
tryton@googlegroups.com mailing list
issues in our server some time ago. Anyway, here's
what we implemented:
http://www.nan-tic.com/en/category/etiquetes/documentation
>
> Anthony
--
Albert Cervera i Areny
http://www.NaN-tic.com
Tel: +34 93 553 18 03
http://twitter.com/albertnan
http://www.nan-tic.com/blog
--
tryton@googlegroups.com mailing list
uld be great to port to Tryton
if the community is interested on it), is that documentation can be inherited
the same way views are. So this means that documentation should be written
with that in mind. Would that be something that the Tryton community would
like to have?
>
>
> Anthony
r future needs.
They have fiscal positions depending on the address of the company emiting the
invoice and the customer receiving it and things like that...
--
Albert Cervera i Areny
http://www.NaN-tic.com
Tel: +34 93 553 18 03
http://twitter.com/albertnan
http://www.nan-tic.com/blog
--
tryto
al charts of
accounts defined in Spain. In fact, the Spanish chart of accounts is really
huge compared to those of other countries (~760 accounts if I'm not mistaken).
--
Albert Cervera i Areny
http://www.NaN-tic.com
Tel: +34 93 553 18 03
http://twitter.com/albertnan
http://www.nan-tic.com
A Dijous, 15 de setembre de 2011 14:17:56, Cédric Krier va escriure:
> On 15/09/11 14:08 +0200, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
> > A Dijous, 15 de setembre de 2011 13:51:09, Cédric Krier va escriure:
> > > In conclusion, my question is:
> > > Is it really a requiremen
ve those duplicated e-mails in
those mailing lists) it is quite hard to remember to press the appropriate
button depending on the mailing list you're in.
> Thanks.
>
> [1] http://linux.sgms-centre.com/misc/netiquette.php#noprivate
--
Albert Cervera i Areny
http://www.NaN-ti
A Dilluns, 19 de setembre de 2011 13:52:45, Cédric Krier va escriure:
> On 19/09/11 13:36 +0200, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
> > A Dilluns, 19 de setembre de 2011 12:31:19, Cédric Krier va escriure:
> > > On 30/06/11 11:44 +0200, Cédric Krier wrote:
> > > > Hi,
>
A Dilluns, 19 de setembre de 2011 14:29:33, Nicolas Évrard va escriure:
> * Albert Cervera i Areny [2011-09-19 13:36 +0200]:
> >> I would like to add attention about the topic #12 [1].
> >> Don't use the reply-to-all button when answering to the mailing list,
>
A Dilluns, 19 de setembre de 2011 16:16:41, Albert Cervera i Areny va
escriure:
> A Dilluns, 19 de setembre de 2011 14:29:33, Nicolas Évrard va escriure:
> > * Albert Cervera i Areny [2011-09-19 13:36 +0200]:
> > >> I would like to add attention about the topic #12 [1].
A Dilluns, 19 de setembre de 2011 16:44:24, Cédric Krier va escriure:
> On 19/09/11 16:24 +0200, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
> > BTW, I think another reason for using reply-all in those mailing lists is
> > that there's quite a lot of traffic and some hackers cannot follow a
ed.
We already implementated that for OpenERP [1] and explained that to B2CK guys
in a recent meeting in Barcelona. I think there was interest and I think it
should not be very hard to make an initial port to Tryton of the module [2]. I
have other patches pending to finish and very little time
> Also to know the precise number of people attending this supper, can
> you reply to this email so that I can make the booking ?
Count on Àngel and me too.
>
> Thank you.
--
Albert Cervera i Areny
http://www.NaN-tic.com
Tel: +34 93 553 18 03
http://twitter.com/albertnan
to OpenERP, but we'd like
to propose that for Tryton. We think we have the appropriate design to
implement it at stock level, but I think it'll be much easier to discuss in
the unconference. Maybe the production workshop could be a good place to
discuss procurement-related stuff such
com/watch?v=8JnkSA0sevc
>
> Anthony
Could you add the ones that you upload here:
http://code.google.com/p/tryton/wiki/Liege2011#Videos
They will be easier to track :)
--
Albert Cervera i Areny
http://www.NaN-tic.com
Tel: +34 93 553 18 03
http://twitter.com/albertnan
http://www.nan-tic.com/blog
you very much for summarizing the points we discussed at the
TUL.
Given the lack of answers to this e-mail, I think we can probably conclude
that everyone feels we already discussed pretty much everything in Liége. At
least, that's my POV.
--
Albert Cervera i Areny
http://www.NaN-tic.c
ghted by Luis. For me it was clear that the funding paid for the
development of a single feature, but let's try to clear all doubts.
--
Albert Cervera i Areny
http://www.NaN-tic.com
Tel: +34 93 553 18 03
http://twitter.com/albertnan
http://www.nan-tic.com/blog
--
tryton@googlegroups.com mailing list
#x27;s all about ethics.
I also agree on that.
--
Albert Cervera i Areny
http://www.NaN-tic.com
Tel: +34 93 553 18 03
http://twitter.com/albertnan
http://www.nan-tic.com/blog
--
tryton@googlegroups.com mailing list
A Diumenge, 20 de novembre de 2011 10:18:05, Cédric Krier va escriure:
> On 20/11/11 09:08 +0100, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
> > > I would go one step further, we should have the right evaluate the
> > > donors and even deny a donation depending upont the entity that mak
/index.shtml
>
> PS: and no, we will not implement our own pseudo-standard format like
> OpenERP [2].
>
>
> [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_Data_Interchange
> [2] http://www.openerp.com/node/974
--
Albert Cervera i Areny
http://www.NaN-tic.com
Tel: +34 9
>
> Additional Udos question was answered here:
> http://www.carookee.net/forum/bilanzbuchhalter-fachthemen/24837833-0-01113
>
> regarding the precision: Rounding is only allowed on the final sum, with
> the standard business rounding to two digits
Btw, that is also the w
uct for every
> specific assets or expenses.
> So common expenses will be:
>
> - Flights
> - Fuel
> - Hostel
>
> common assets will be:
>
> - Building
> - Cars
>
> Later, I will write a blueprint for amortization of assets.
>
> Commen
h a
> shipment and a return shipment.
This sounds very, very well.
--
Albert Cervera i Areny
http://www.NaN-tic.com
Tel: +34 93 553 18 03
http://twitter.com/albertnan
http://www.nan-tic.com/blog
--
tryton@googlegroups.com mailing list
redit note
> when the "return shipment" is received.
I disagree. Although in our experience this is the most usual behaviour I
think we should be able to work both ways: create a single document or create
two of them.
BTW, We should eventually implement the same for purchases, I
order
point". I think that is more descriptive of what will actually happen.
--
Albert Cervera i Areny
http://www.NaN-tic.com
Tel: +34 93 553 18 03
http://twitter.com/albertnan
http://www.nan-tic.com/blog
--
tryton@googlegroups.com mailing list
; After some days, I find it more annoying than useful, especially since
> there is the search box.
I've been using it these days and I agree it's somewhat annoying. Probably a
small icon on the left to make it popup would be of some help, though.
--
Albert Cervera i Areny
http://ww
ntend to create a new module for that but
Is this something that makes sense to have in the standard account module?
--
Albert Cervera i Areny
http://www.NaN-tic.com
Tel: +34 93 553 18 03
http://twitter.com/albertnan
http://www.nan-tic.com/blog
--
tryton@googlegroups.com mailing list
A Diumenge, 18 de març de 2012 02:08:22, Cédric Krier va escriure:
> On 17/03/12 17:42 +0100, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
> > Hi,
> > we need to add a checkbox to the account definition that if checked
> > ensures that all moves of that account also have the party fill
n is that to determine if the read
> method will be called,
> trytond first searches for a list of (infered from the read method's
> signature) since there are no Order records the database it simply doesn't
> call it, am I correct?,
> Am I lost on my path?
Did you implement the search() function?
--
Albert Cervera i Areny
http://www.NaN-tic.com
Tel: +34 93 553 18 03
http://twitter.com/albertnan
http://www.nan-tic.com/blog
--
tryton@googlegroups.com mailing list
ual password.
>
> Thanks:
I guess the idea is that you can't. It would have no sense otherwise.
--
Albert Cervera i Areny
http://www.NaN-tic.com
Tel: +34 93 553 18 03
http://twitter.com/albertnan
http://www.nan-tic.com/blog
--
tryton@googlegroups.com mailing list
IP6 but nothing precise...
--
Albert Cervera i Areny
http://www.NaN-tic.com
Tel: +34 93 553 18 03
http://twitter.com/albertnan
http://www.nan-tic.com/blog
--
--
tryton@googlegroups.com mailing list
take a look at this:
https://bitbucket.org/ukoma/party_bank/
--
Albert Cervera i Areny
http://www.NaN-tic.com
Tel: +34 93 553 18 03
http://twitter.com/albertnan
http://www.nan-tic.com/blog
--
tryton@googlegroups.com mailing list
allocate proportionally.
Some companies prefer to put the difference in a write-off (unsure if it's the
correct English term) analytic account.
But I agree that having analytic accounting linked to accounting moves is a
good thing.
--
Albert Cervera i Areny
http://www.NaN-tic.com
Tel: +34 93 553 18 03
http://twitter.com/albertnan
http://www.nan-tic.com/blog
--
--
tryton@googlegroups.com mailing list
or occurred...
Unhandled exception.
Details: The API call datastore_v3.RunQuery() required more quota than is
available. [OverQuotaError]
Please post a message to the discussion group if you have any questions.
--
Albert Cervera i Areny
http://www.NaN-tic.com
Tel: +34 93 553 18 03
http://tw
onfig and instructions on
> how to connect the VPN before opening Tryton. This is do-able but may
> intimidate some of the users.
Using NAT could also be an option.
--
Albert Cervera i Areny
http://www.NaN-tic.com
Tel: +34 93 553 18 03
http://twitter.com/albertnan
http://www.nan-tic.com/blog
o
in journal configuration you would only be allowed to select accounts of type
"statement".
I'm not sure I'd call it "statement" though, maybe something like "Cash" or
something like that. I've missed in other cases a similar classification so
d-write. In Koo
we opened in a new tab if the user pressed Control key when clicking on the
folder icon, which is similar to what most web browsers do nowadays.
--
Albert Cervera i Areny
http://www.NaN-tic.com
Tel: +34 93 553 18 03
http://twitter.com/albertnan
http://www.nan-tic.com/blog
--
--
tryton@googlegroups.com mailing list
even
know its name (you may have an e-mail, a telephone...).
Was the management of unqualified leads alread discussed? If so, how was
that designed?
Thanks!
[1] http://code.google.com/p/tryton/wiki/SaleOpportunity
--
Albert Cervera i Areny
http://www.nan-tic.com
Tel: 93 553 18 03
Twitter:
A Dijous, 27 de desembre de 2012 21:50:07, Cédric Krier va escriure:
> On 24/12/12 09:19 +0100, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
> > In sale_opportunity module party is a required field and in the blueprint
> > [1] nothing is said about the management of unqualified leads. In many
&g
A Dijous, 27 de desembre de 2012 23:38:14, Cédric Krier va escriure:
> On 27/12/12 23:21 +0100, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
> > A Dijous, 27 de desembre de 2012 21:50:07, Cédric Krier va escriure:
> > > On 24/12/12 09:19 +0100, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
> > > &
A Divendres, 28 de desembre de 2012 01:06:20, Cédric Krier va escriure:
> On 27/12/12 23:49 +0100, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
> > > So ok to drop the required on party but then opportunity must have a
> > > code filled by a sequence and party must become required
it or just have a first ok/ko feedback?
>
>
> [1] http://nikola.ralsina.com.ar/
--
Albert Cervera i Areny
http://www.NaN-tic.com
Tel: +34 93 553 18 03
http://twitter.com/albertnan
http://www.nan-tic.com/blog
--
--
tryton@googlegroups.com mailing list
http://foundation.tryton.org/
(*) For transparency we detail current and expected expenses for the first
year:
Notary: 1.200€
Accounting: 800€
Server: 300€
DNS: 15€
Account: 25€
Credit card: 30€
Our goal of 3.000€ will ensure we can go for a higher server for unit
testing.
--
Albert Cervera i Areny
dy ?
I haven't done anything like that but I'd be very interested in your results
if you work on this.
--
Albert Cervera i Areny
http://www.NaN-tic.com
Tel: +34 93 553 18 03
http://twitter.com/albertnan
http://www.nan-tic.com/blog
--
--
tryton@googlegroups.com mailing list
A Dimecres, 2 de gener de 2013 20:05:00, Albert Cervera i Areny va escriure:
> Dear Tryton Community,
>
> Several weeks ago we were pleased to announce the long awaited Tryton
> Foundation [1] which is in charge of the financial needs of the Tryton
> project, including the
e it is difficult anyone can
help you.
--
Albert Cervera i Areny
http://www.NaN-tic.com
Tel: +34 93 553 18 03
http://twitter.com/albertnan
http://www.nan-tic.com/blog
--
--
tryton@googlegroups.com mailing list
for your language.
>
> > The missing news could be added later once the website is live.
>
> I think the website is ready to go live.
> I propose to proceed next week.
--
Albert Cervera i Areny
http://www.NaN-tic.com
Tel: +34 93 553 18 03
http://twitter.com/albertnan
http://www.nan-tic.com/blog
--
--
tryton@googlegroups.com mailing list
hold ASAP because
of the time required for reservations and visas.
So the discussion is open. Other volunteers? Opinions?
--
Albert Cervera i Areny
http://www.NaN-tic.com
Tel: +34 93 553 18 03
http://twitter.com/albertnan
http://www.nan-tic.com/blog
odels (such as purchase.purchase or
purchase.request) and then updating the state of your model with triggers [2]
on those objects, for example.
[1] http://doc.tryton.org/2.6/trytond/doc/ref/models/models.html#workflow
[2]
http://doc.tryton.org/2.6/trytond/doc/ref/models/models.html#trytond.model.ModelStorage
A Dimarts, 2 d'abril de 2013 00:50:38, Albert Cervera i Areny va escriure:
> Hi,
> we (Zikzakmedia + NaN·tic) would like to organize this year's Tryton
> Unconference in Barcelona (TUB). I don't know if there is other people in
> the community interested in holding t
gs. They preferred Tryton over OpenERP
for code quality and architecture, and I think there are lots of chances
Tryton will keep growing because arguments are solid enough when properly
explained.
--
Albert Cervera i Areny
http://www.NaN-tic.com
Tel: +34 93 553 18 03
http://twitter.com/albertnan
http://www.nan-tic.com/blog
d of the base module.
So basically this e-mail is to know if you're interested in such module to be
part of tryton.
[1] https://bitbucket.org/trytonspain/trytond-account_statement_of_account
[2] http://postimg.org/image/4e8ukjfo7/
[3] http://postimg.org/image/u8mk6sbbf/
--
Albert Cerve
ou're using or are interested, please let us know.
[1] http://codereview.tryton.org/853002/
[2] https://groups.google.com/d/topic/tryton/xlNW4CQmRYQ/discussion
--
Albert Cervera i Areny
http://www.NaN-tic.com
Tel: +34 93 553 18 03
http://twitter.com/albertnan
http://www.nan-tic.com/blog
> >
> > Apologies, haven't seen the developer pushed it.
>
> What do you suggest as a name? This is for tryton so we thought to name it
> like this.
Note that thanks to the Tryton classifier, the prefix is irrelevant given that
potential users will find it anyway:
h
1o8Mo/discussion
--
Albert Cervera i Areny
Tel. 93 553 18 03
@albertnan
www.NaN-tic.com
A Divendres 31 Mai 2013 22:01:00, Cédric Krier va escriure:
> On 30/05/13 22:59 -0700, Albert Cervera Areny wrote:
> > El dimarts 28 de maig de 2013 14:21:59 UTC+2, Cédric Krier va escriure:
> > > On 28/05/13 13:19 +0200, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
> > > >
With analytic_account (and analytic_*) it is possible to define that a given
hierarchy is required and all lines in invoices, sales and purchases will
force the user to define an analytic account for that hierarchy. The problem is
that accounts in those lines may not necessarily be revenue/expen
t would be more interesting to add a Many2One field in sale.sale
that refers to the opportunity to which the sale is linked. Maybe the sale
should only be created if no previous quotations have been created and there
are products assigned to the opportunity.
--
Albert Cervera i Areny
Consultor fun
A Dissabte 01 Juny 2013 09:53:02, Cédric Krier va escriure:
> On 01/06/13 01:36 +0200, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
> > With analytic_account (and analytic_*) it is possible to define that a
> > given hierarchy is required and all lines in invoices, sales and
> > purchases w
A Dissabte 01 Juny 2013 09:53:52, Cédric Krier va escriure:
> On 01/06/13 02:07 +0200, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
> > There's something in the workflow of opportunities that I think could be
> > improved. I don't think that the end of the workflow should create a
>
A Dissabte 01 Juny 2013 19:35:46, Cédric Krier va escriure:
> On 01/06/13 17:46 +0200, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
> > A Dissabte 01 Juny 2013 09:53:02, Cédric Krier va escriure:
> > > On 01/06/13 01:36 +0200, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
> > > > With analytic_
A Dissabte 01 Juny 2013 19:31:43, Cédric Krier va escriure:
> On 01/06/13 19:18 +0200, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
> > A Dissabte 01 Juny 2013 09:53:52, Cédric Krier va escriure:
> > > On 01/06/13 02:07 +0200, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
> > > > There&
A Dissabte 01 Juny 2013 23:34:51, Cédric Krier va escriure:
> On 01/06/13 20:11 +0200, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
> > A Dissabte 01 Juny 2013 19:31:43, Cédric Krier va escriure:
> > > On 01/06/13 19:18 +0200, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
> > > > A Dissabte 01 Ju
A Diumenge 02 Juny 2013 01:03:16, Albert Cervera i Areny va escriure:
> A Dissabte 01 Juny 2013 23:34:51, Cédric Krier va escriure:
> > On 01/06/13 20:11 +0200, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
> > > A Dissabte 01 Juny 2013 19:31:43, Cédric Krier va escriure:
> > > > O
eas and implements.
This is generally the right list for discussing such functional suggestions.
Eventually a bug should be filled in the bug tracker.
One e-mail per item, please.
--
Albert Cervera i Areny
Consultor funcional
Tel. 93 553 18 03
@albertnan
www.NaN-tic.com
Avís legal >>
se, if you have access to the wiki [2] you can add yourself to the
section we added and if you don't you can send an e-mail to me or the
mailing list.
Thanks!
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sprint_(software_development)
[2] https://code.google.com/p/tryton/wiki/Barcelona2013
--
*Albert
A Diumenge 02 Juny 2013 03:54:45, Sharoon Thomas va escriure:
> On Sun 02 Jun 20 01:41, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
> > By the way, it is even possible, with at least one of our customers that
> > their customer confirms two of the quotations sent because they decide
> > to
A Dilluns 03 Juny 2013 08:51:50, Cédric Krier va escriure:
> On 02/06/13 01:03 +0200, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
> > A Dissabte 01 Juny 2013 23:34:51, Cédric Krier va escriure:
> > > For me, it is wrong to create many Sale/Quotation when you know only
> > > one
A Dilluns 03 Juny 2013 16:58:34, Sergi Almacellas Abellana va escriure:
> Al 03/06/13 16:33, En/na Albert Cervera i Areny ha escrit:
> > A Diumenge 02 Juny 2013 03:54:45, Sharoon Thomas va escriure:
> >> On Sun 02 Jun 20 01:41, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
> >>> B
A Dilluns 03 Juny 2013 16:56:36, Cédric Krier va escriure:
> On 03/06/13 16:38 +0200, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
> > A Dilluns 03 Juny 2013 08:51:50, Cédric Krier va escriure:
> > > On 02/06/13 01:03 +0200, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
> > > > A Dissabte 01 Juny
A Dimarts 04 Juny 2013 10:36:04, Cédric Krier va escriure:
> On 01/06/13 02:07 +0200, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
> > There's something in the workflow of opportunities that I think could be
> > improved. I don't think that the end of the workflow should create a
>
A Dissabte 01 Juny 2013 09:49:25, Cédric Krier va escriure:
> On 01/06/13 00:48 +0200, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
> > The proposal is not about removing the hard link it is changing the way
> > the standard "required" is implemented to allow more flexibility in
> &
ductions.
>
> Please tell me if you have any other applications?
events in calendar module :)
--
Albert Cervera i Areny
Consultor funcional
Tel. 93 553 18 03
@albertnan
www.NaN-tic.com
Avís legal >>
A Dilluns 10 Juny 2013 11:16:48, Sergi Almacellas Abellana va escriure:
> Al 09/06/13 01:25, En/na Cédric Krier ha escrit:
> > On 08/06/13 23:01 +0200, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
> >>> A Dissabte 08 Juny 2013 20:59:19, Cédric Krier va escriure:
> >>>>>
explained.
Would you want your company or one of your customers (with their permission)
be added to this section, please e-mail me the information and I will work on
creating the page.
I think this is a key point for the widespread of Tryton.
Thanks!
--
Albert Cervera i Areny
Tel. 93 553 18 03
be evaluted when the state is won? I think it
should simply sum all confirmed sales.
--
Albert Cervera i Areny
Consultor funcional
Tel. 93 553 18 03
@albertnan
www.NaN-tic.com
er without the need of a
wiki access.
We'll keep you updated.
Please, if you need an invitation to apply for a visa to visit
Barcelona, you can send me an e-mail.
--
Albert Cervera i Areny
Tel. 93 553 18 03
@albertnan
www.NaN-tic.com
We're happy to announce that the website for TUB 2013 has been published [1].
Registration to the event is also available from the site.
And of course, everything is ready for the Beer^W Tryton knowledge
exchange Event!
Please, spread the word!
[1] http://tub2013.tryton.org
--
Albert Ce
2013/8/7 Albert Cervera i Areny :
> We're happy to announce that the website for TUB 2013 has been published [1].
By the way, you can contribute to the site by sending codereviews
against the public mercurial repository:
http://hg.tryton.org/tpf/tub2013
--
Albert Cervera i Areny
C
2013/8/10 Cédric Krier :
> On 07/08/13 18:40 +0200, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
>> Registration to the event is also available from the site.
>
> How can we see the participants?
It is not directly accessible AFAICS. Is it important?
--
Albert Cervera i Areny
Consultor funcio
2013/8/12 Cédric Krier :
> On 12/08/13 09:08 +0200, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
>> 2013/8/10 Cédric Krier :
>> > On 07/08/13 18:40 +0200, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
>> >> Registration to the event is also available from the site.
>> >
>> >
2013/8/12 Cédric Krier :
> On 12/08/13 12:53 +0200, Cédric Krier wrote:
>> On 12/08/13 12:49 +0200, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
>> > 2013/8/12 Cédric Krier :
>> > > On 12/08/13 09:08 +0200, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
>> > >> 2013/8/10 Cédric Krie
1 - 100 of 238 matches
Mail list logo
