Re: [tg-trunk] extract_messages for *.jinja does not work at all.

2016-10-19 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 19.10.2016 um 07:57 schrieb Mingcai SHEN: I finally find the problem after I changed silent to false: Glad you found it. I thought that silent=false was the default in 2.8, but in fact the default didn't change, you need to set it explicitly. -- Chris -- You received this message

Re: [tg-trunk] extract_messages for *.jinja does not work at all.

2016-10-18 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
2016年10月17日星期一 UTC+8下午9:39:07,Christoph Zwerschke写道: Am 17.10.2016 um 14:56 schrieb Mingcai SHEN: > But it just can extract {% trans %} {% endtrans %} or {{ gettext('') }} > from the template files into the pot file. You meant *can't* extract, not *can* extract, right?

Re: [tg-trunk] extract_messages for *.jinja does not work at all.

2016-10-17 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 17.10.2016 um 14:56 schrieb Mingcai SHEN: But it just can extract {% trans %} {% endtrans %} or {{ gettext('') }} from the template files into the pot file. You meant *can't* extract, not *can* extract, right? I just tried it with a newly created project, and this simple template: {{

Re: [tg-trunk] extract_messages for *.jinja does not work at all.

2016-10-13 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 13.10.2016 um 15:14 schrieb Mingcai SHEN: I'm using TG2.3.9 with Jinja2 templates, and when I run "setup.py extract_messages", it does not extract any strings from jinja files inside {% trans %} block or {{ gettext('') }} etc... This should work. Are you sure your templates have the

Re: [tg-trunk] Supported Versions?

2016-04-26 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 26.04.2016 um 09:41 schrieb Alessandro Molina: I have not used TW1 for years and was planning to remove it from 2.4, it seems to me it's currently unmaintained so keeping it around is probably an huge burden :D It's a bit difficult to migrate from TW1 to TW2 though. I still have one legacy

Re: [tg-trunk] Future of Genshi

2015-02-18 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 18.02.2015 um 10:15 schrieb Alessandro Molina: I'm writing here because I'm fearing we will have to make a clear step regarding genshi in the near future. So I would like to gather as much opinions as possible regarding the matter. First of all, it's very sad that Genshi has stalled. The

Re: [tg-trunk] Tests for tg2devtools

2013-06-27 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 25.06.2013 00:29, schrieb Alessandro Molina: Ok, finally found the reason. While on more recent versions the output for subtests is: tgtest00.tests.functional.test_authentication.TestAuthentication.test_forced_login Anonymous users are forced to login ... ok On Python2.6 the class path

[tg-trunk] Using relative names in quickstarted templates

2013-06-25 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
It sometimes bothers me how often the package name of a TG project is repeated in a controller module, both in import statements like from mylongpackagename.model import MyModelClass and in expose decorators like @expose(mylongpackagename.templates.mypage). So I thought about changing the

Re: [tg-trunk] Tests for tg2devtools

2013-06-24 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 24.06.2013 18:18, schrieb Alessandro Molina: I made some advancements on the testsuite and now is able to pass on Py2.7 on travis: https://travis-ci.org/TurboGears/tg2devtools/builds/8390939 Great. I tried it under Windows and fixed a small issue. Another problem is that some packages like

Re: [tg-trunk] Tests for tg2devtools

2013-06-23 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 23.06.2013 14:51, schrieb Alessandro Molina: The most simple solution would be to specify all the dependencies in tests_require of devtools, but I don't think this is the right solution, the tests should probably install the dependencies depending on the quickstarted app. But then

Re: [tg-trunk] Tests for tg2devtools

2013-06-21 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 21.06.2013 15:12, schrieb Alessandro Molina: 2) What to do on Py3, the current travis env for TG2.3 tests on Py26, 27, 32, 33. But some of the quickstarts don't work on Py3 due to missing libraries (ming, sprox, tgext.admin mostly). What should we test? Should gearbox quickstart create the

Re: [tg-trunk] Tests for tg2devtools

2013-06-20 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 20.06.2013 00:06, schrieb Alessandro Molina: Maybe someone more proficient in nose knows a better way to run the tests of the generated application from inside the testsuite, right now it loads them with nose.run which makes the whole testsuite result as a single test. I found that

Re: [tg-trunk] Another problem with tests in TG 2.3

2013-06-19 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 19.06.2013 00:27, schrieb Craig Small: Oh, I thought that was done on purpose. I hit that problem when testing things outside the controllers that need models to operate. I basically copied some of the code across to make my own setup but fixing it right would be a better idea. It is fixed

Re: [tg-trunk] Tests for tg2devtools

2013-06-19 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 20.06.2013 00:06, schrieb Alessandro Molina: I tried to implement a more flexible test suite for quickstart, it now runs the quickstart with different options trying to run the test suite for each one of them. You beat me to it, I wanted to do in a similar way. Maybe someone more

[tg-trunk] Use nose2 for TG 2.3

2013-06-18 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Since TG 2.3 requires Py 2.6 already, this would be a good opportunity to move from nose to nose2. What do you think? -- Christoph -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups TurboGears Trunk group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from

[tg-trunk] Another problem with tests in TG 2.3

2013-06-18 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
I found another problem when running tests for a quickstarted project with SQLAlchemy: The test application is only loaded in TestController.setUp() which is only run when the test methods in tests/functional run. When you run only the tests in tests/model, then the application is not loaded,

Re: [tg-trunk] Another problem with tests in TG 2.3

2013-06-18 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 18.06.2013 20:39, schrieb Jorge Vargas: That's what the other tests you found broken were supposed to prevent Yes, I'll try to create a replacement for these as well. -- Christoph -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups TurboGears Trunk group. To

Re: [tg-trunk] Problem with TG functional tests

2013-06-17 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Just noticed that the patch for supporting a 'default' authenticator entry, which was the main problem why the test failed, has not been backported to 2.2 anyway, so it does not make much sense to backport this fix either. I only noticed it because I used a patched version of 2.2 with

[tg-trunk] Tests for tg2devtools

2013-06-17 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
In devtools.test there is a test_pastetemplate which is broken in 2.3 because devtools.pastetemplate does not exist any more. Are there plans to add tests to devtools again before 2.3 is out? -- Christoph -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups TurboGears

Re: [tg-trunk] Problem with TG functional tests

2013-06-14 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 14.06.2013 10:30, schrieb Alessandro Molina: https://github.com/TurboGears/tg2/commit/1c4da8da9fc5bc85023645b72f906d8c3132fc97#L1R888 should fix the issue. It looks like it was introduced by the ('default', None) authenticator feature that changed the original list of authenticators in the

Re: [tg-trunk] Problem with TG functional tests

2013-06-14 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 14.06.2013 16:03, schrieb Alessandro Molina: Thanks, will update it soon, did the patch work for you? Haven't tried it, since my projects are still using TG 2.2. -- Christoph -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups TurboGears Trunk group. To

Re: [tg-trunk] Re: TG Website redesign proposal

2013-06-13 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Nice. I also liked the gears in the background of the old version, but the new version looks cleaner and more modern without them. Everyone likes flat and simple design these days. -- Christoph Am 13.06.2013 15:16, schrieb Alessandro Molina: Added responsive breakpoints to make it also

[tg-trunk] Problem with TG functional tests

2013-06-12 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
I have just run into an ugly problem with TG 2.2.2 that you can reproduce as follows: * Quickstart a project * Set in config/app_cfg.py: base_config.sa_auth.authenticators = [('default', None)] * Run paster setup-app * Run nosestests You get this error: app = setup_auth(app,

Re: [tg-trunk] Re: Repository Combining Idea

2013-04-25 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 25.04.2013 04:46, schrieb Michael Pedersen: Is everybody okay with simply not having tags in the tg2docs repository? But doesn't rtfd.org create the various versions of the docs based on tags in the repository? -- Chris -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Re: [tg-trunk] Re: Repository Combining Idea

2013-04-25 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 25.04.2013 18:52, schrieb Michael Pedersen: If it does, then why not combine everything down into one repository? As for size, we'd be creating a single repository that's about 24M to download/clone/search. For point of reference, the actual repository for tg2 is 7.1M, tg2devtools is 3.1M,

Re: [tg-trunk] Re: 2.3 doc review

2013-01-07 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 07.01.2013 12:47, schrieb Alessandro Molina: Also open to suggestions, I agree that the current theme is a bit depressing for the color scheme :D What else do you expect when you let a German create the theme? ;) -- Christoph -- You received this message because you are subscribed to

Re: [tg-trunk] 1.0/1.1/1.5 Docs

2013-01-05 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 05.01.2013 21:02, schrieb Michael Pedersen: Hey, Christoph? Since you're the one who knows the most about this, I'll ask you: How does one generate the docs for TG 1.0, 1,1, and 1.5? I'm working on a site rebuilding script/tool that I want to have those be part of the process it runs. Since

Re: [tg-trunk] 2.3 doc review

2012-12-31 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Nice, thanks! Minor issue: in the TG 2.1 and 2.2 version of the docs, you could move the sidebar to the right side by grabbing the handle and it would stay there (via cookie). This doesn't seem to work any more in 2.3. -- Chris -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Re: [tg-trunk] Translation of TW2 messages

2012-10-03 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 03.10.2012 11:25, schrieb Alessandro Molina: That's a great work, I ended up having the same issue but I solved it by handling the translation inside my own application, your solution is much more convenient. Ok, so I sent a pull request to get in TW2. Maybe you can then add the Italian

[tg-trunk] Translation of TW2 messages

2012-10-01 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
After replacing FormEncode validators with TW2 validators in a TG2 app I found that the validator messages were not translated any more. I'm proposing the patch at https://github.com/toscawidgets/tw2.core/issues/55 to solve this problem, please let me know what you think. Maybe we could also

[tg-trunk] Re: Switching To GitHub

2012-09-27 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Just want to point out that the move to GitHub has some other positive side-effects. For instance, GitHub makes it much easier for people to fork TurboGears and send in pull requests. Another advantage is that you can connect to the Github issues from Eclipse/Mylyn, for those who are using

Re: [tg-trunk] TurboGears 2.2 and authentication

2012-09-19 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 19.09.2012 05:56, schrieb Michael Pedersen: No need to wait even. The repositories will be copied wholesale, so the push can be done whenever. Ok, I'll only have time next week anyway. Will check that in to the development branch then and merge it back to the branch-2.2 so it will go to

[tg-trunk] TurboGears 2.2 and authentication

2012-09-17 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
While upgrading a project from TG 2.1 to 2.2 I noticed that the authenticators setting (a list of custom authenticators) is handled differently depending on whether authmetadata is defined (new-style config) or not (old style). In new-style configuration, the default authenticator will not be

Re: [tg-trunk] Switching To GitHub

2012-09-10 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 10.09.2012 17:11, schrieb Christophe de Vienne: Have you considered bitbucket too ? IIRC the tg repositories were once hosted there, and it has the same avantages over SF (the ones you mention at least). That would mean switching from git back to hg again. Much easier to stay with git.

Re: [tg-trunk] Switching To GitHub

2012-09-10 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 10.09.2012 20:45, schrieb Kevin Horn: FYI, bitbucket supports git repos now, as well as hg ones. Thanks for the update, that move had indeed slipped under my radar. -- Chris -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups TurboGears Trunk group. To post to

Re: [tg-trunk] Where to report web page and documentation inconsistencies

2012-07-12 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 12.07.2012 15:08, schrieb Eoghan Murray: The SourceForge signup process is heavy handed enough to have turned me away from submitting a simple documentation fix. You don't even need to register, you can login with OpenID using your Google account and a couple of others. -- Christoph --

Re: [tg-trunk] Where to report web page and documentation inconsistencies

2012-07-12 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 12.07.2012 21:05, schrieb Eoghan Murray: I was able to create that SourceForge user from scratch. I can't find a repository for TurboGears 1.5 though The repository is here: https://sourceforge.net/p/turbogears1/code/ If you want to write a page about TurboMail and how it can be used with

Re: [tg-trunk] Re: State of the Gears

2012-07-08 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 08.07.2012 21:20, schrieb Alessandro Molina: Now I don't see any point in bringing it up again, especially considering that the 2.3 pylons less branch has been already under development for 6 months, is now able to serve TurboGears applications three times faster without any required change,

Re: [tg-trunk] Where is latest documentation location?

2012-07-07 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am Freitag, 6. Juli 2012 04:59:57 UTC+2 schrieb Michael Pedersen: Allow me to apologize for not getting this done sooner. It's been a very busy week for me (just started a new job, and there's all the joys of settling in at a new job work that needs doing). Anyway, the problem turns out to

[tg-trunk] TurboGears 2 doc issues

2012-05-21 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
When I go to http://www.turbogears.org/2.1/docs/, it says TG 2.2.0rc1 docs in the upper left corner. When I go to http://www.turbogears.org/2.2/docs/, it also says TG 2.2.0rc1 docs but the start page is different. When I click on Getting started, both docs talk about TG 2.1.5. Pretty confusing.

Re: [tg-trunk] Jinja Problems

2012-04-20 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 20.04.2012 10:34, schrieb Alessandro Molina: Sorry, my fault. I forgot to rename the templates in the test suite. The strange thing is that I didn't receive any email fron jenkins reporting the failed builds. See the console output: Sending e-mails to: turbogears-trunk@googlegroups.com

Re: [tg-trunk] 2.2 updates

2012-03-26 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 25.03.2012 23:06, schrieb Alessandro Molina: As I'm getting near the end of the targets that got decided for 2.2 release during the last meeting, I decided to write here to update the other development team members of the current status and ask some help with testing. We decided to require

Re: [tg-trunk] Disabling routes by default in TG2.2/2.3

2012-02-29 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 29.02.2012 12:52, schrieb Alessandro Molina: As routes is performed for each request is a performance bottleneck for no benefit in 99% of TG projects, so it is probably fine to disable it and require an enable_routes=True option in app_cfg to enable it again. It would require little effort

Re: [tg-trunk] Style guidelines (was: Making a 2.1.5 bugfix release?)

2012-02-25 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 25.02.2012 16:53, schrieb Alessandro Molina: Merging the branch made me notice just one issue, for future commits please remember to split feature/bugfix commits from pure syntax rearrangement/cleanup ones. You're right, clean-up work should be done in separate commits. I'm particularly

[tg-trunk] Problem installing older TG2 versions

2012-02-25 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
On the tg-users mailing list the problem came up that it seems to be impossible to easy_install non-current TG2 versions even though we have set up special download indexes for these, because the dependency_links setting points to the current index and overrides the -i option of easy_install.

Re: [tg-trunk] What should we do with Dojo?

2012-02-24 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 24.02.2012 05:34, schrieb Michael Pedersen: I have no object to providing ways to use Bootstrap, especially if it's just a set of jQuery plugins. From reading a (very) little about it, though, it looks like it might be an alternative, instead, and that I'll have issues with providing in the

Re: [tg-trunk] What should we do with Dojo?

2012-02-23 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 23.02.2012 04:29, schrieb Michael Pedersen: At this point in web land, jQuery seems to rule the roost, and I'd like to make that the default choice that we tell people to use, and provide ways to use the others. I think that boils down to that somebody needs to bring tw2.jquery back into

Re: [tg-trunk] Making a 2.1.5 bugfix release?

2012-02-23 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 23.02.2012 05:29, schrieb Michael Pedersen: The only issue I have with anything is the seeming belief that we need a special branch for the 2.1 line. We really don't. We do our planned next release work on development. When we have to do a bug-fix release, we branch from the tag that had the

Re: [tg-trunk] Making a 2.1.5 bugfix release?

2012-02-22 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 22.02.2012 10:37, schrieb Alessandro Molina: Anyone is against to this? Is there any reason for not doing this? We always made bugfix releases for older branches in the past, that's a good practice. Also the 2.1 branch is important since we recently decided it's the last one that provides

Re: [tg-trunk] Suggestion to make Chuck Norris happy again

2012-02-16 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Ok, I have now added download directories development and next for the corresponding branches in our Git repository. The development directory contains the Crank package which made Chuck really happy. Is the development branch supposed to work with Python 2.4? There are two issues that

Re: [tg-trunk] Suggestion to make Chuck Norris happy again

2012-02-16 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 16.02.2012 20:15, schrieb Alessandro Molina: I remember Python2.4 support being dropped with the last release. Michael can probably confirm this as I remember him adding version check inside the TG source code. There is only a version check that allows Py2.4 to work by adding pysqlite and

Re: [tg-trunk] Suggestion to make Chuck Norris happy again

2012-02-16 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 16.02.2012 20:45, schrieb Alessandro Molina: I'm currently managing work this way: development branch - 2.2 pylons-less branch - 2.3 python3 branch - whatever will be after that And the next branch is for the next 2.1.x bugfix release, right? -- You received this message because you

Re: [tg-trunk] Suggestion to make Chuck Norris happy again

2012-02-16 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 16.02.2012 23:20, schrieb Alessandro Molina: Actually I always thought that the next branch was only for release process like stated on http://www.turbogears.org/book/appendices/preprelease.html#finalizing-changes-on-next-branch Makes sense, then this is only intended as a temporary branch.

[tg-trunk] Suggestion to make Chuck Norris happy again

2012-02-10 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
The TG 2.1 tests on the Jenkins server are currently failing and Chuck Norris really does not like it. It looks like this is caused by the fact that we now use Crank which is missing in the current index. This also reveals an issue with the test setup in general. The Jenkins script is

Re: [tg-trunk] Re: Experimental Pylons-less branch

2011-12-11 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 12.12.2011 00:20, schrieb Alessandro Molina: Now pylons-less branch passes all the tests both with and without pylons installed and is now a bit faster than the pylons based branch. Congratulations! This is really a big step forward. Did you run some real-life TG apps with that branch?

Re: [tg-trunk] Few questions about new release

2011-12-05 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 05.12.2011 11:55, schrieb Alessandro Molina: I was thinking about the idea of having a bunch of fake packages like tgproject-sqla, tgproject-ming and so on so that people can place as a dependency for their project in setup.py. Having tgproject-sqla==2.1.1 would provide all the right packages

Re: [tg-trunk] Few questions about new release

2011-12-05 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 05.12.2011 15:03, schrieb Alessandro Molina: Any other idea on how to avoid people having to manage a hube bunch of packages they really don't care about? We could add upper limits to the version numbers in addition to the lower limits. Sure, in reality, even slight changes can break a

[tg-trunk] [ANN] TurboGears 1.5.1 released

2011-11-27 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
upgrading to 2.x. New TurboGears projects should start with TurboGears 2 which is the current, actively maintained variant of the TurboGears web-framework, based on Pylons instead of CherryPy. Have fun with TurboGears and let us know if there are any problems. -- Christoph Zwerschke -- You

[tg-trunk] [ANN] TurboGears 1.5.1 released

2011-11-27 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
upgrading to 2.x. New TurboGears projects should start with TurboGears 2 which is the current, actively maintained variant of the TurboGears web-framework, based on Pylons instead of CherryPy. Have fun with TurboGears and let us know if there are any problems. -- Christoph Zwerschke -- You

Re: [tg-trunk] Request For Feedback

2011-11-18 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 18.11.2011 21:06, schrieb Michael Pedersen: First up: Python 2.4. I've said it in the past few months, but it's starting to look like we must address this sooner rather than later. Other projects are dropping support for it (for instance, WebOb, as of 1.1b1, has dropped support). I'm even

Re: [tg-trunk] Thought About planet.turbogears.org

2011-09-23 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Michael, I would not include tickets or changesets in the feed, as it will be too much noise and people will quickly unsubscribe. But maybe we could activate the Blog tool on the SourceForge project page and post some summary about what we're doing on that Blog, similarly to what you have

[tg-trunk] FormEncode sprint

2011-09-01 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
There will be a IRC sprint for FormEncode on the weekend of Sep 24 for closing the accumulated issues on the bug tracker. Please join us if you want to help out. Mailing list is here: http://www.formencode.org/en/latest/community.html Btw, the FormEncode docs have moved to Read The Docs and the

Re: [tg-trunk] Offline For Unknown Time

2011-08-28 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Good luck to you and all the others out there. -- Christoph -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups TurboGears Trunk group. To post to this group, send email to turbogears-trunk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

Re: [tg-trunk] Content-Type in tg quickstart

2011-07-29 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 28.07.2011 21:56 schrieb Alessandro Molina: I just did a few changes to render.py, decorators.py and master.html and I'm now able to render pages in both xhtml and application/xhtml+xml by simply specifying it inside the expose decorator like: @expose('app.templates.index') - outputs xhtml

Re: [tg-trunk] Content-Type in tg quickstart

2011-07-25 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 25.07.2011 21:31 schrieb Alessandro Molina: Otherwise there might be cases where the controller reports a content-type and the meta tag another one if the users switched content type from the controller without making the template content type dependent from a variable. Actually if you're

[tg-trunk] [ANN] TurboGears 1.5 released

2011-07-14 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
of the TurboGears web-framework, based on Pylons instead of CherryPy. Have fun with TurboGears and let us know on the mailing list if there are any problems. -- Christoph Zwerschke -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups TurboGears Trunk group. To post

Re: [tg-trunk] TG1 and Jenkins

2011-05-25 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 25.05.2011 22:54 schrieb Michael Pedersen: As you can see, something's not quite right with TG1.1 and TG1.5. The error messages in the build output looked like genuine issues, and not problems with the build environment, so I have to forward this along. Ok, I'll try to look into this

Re: [tg-trunk] Python 2.4 Support

2011-05-20 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 20.05.2011 06:02 schrieb Michael Pedersen: Our current development tree provides support for Kajiki. Kajiki does not support Python 2.4. Can't we just provide support for Kajiki as an option without dropping support for Python 2.4? Genshi would continue to be the default because it's

Re: [tg-trunk] Python 2.4 Support

2011-05-20 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 20.05.2011 17:40 schrieb Michael Pedersen: This option didn't even cross my mind. The reason it didn't is because it violates another goal: 100% testing coverage. To test that Kajiki works, we have to test it. In order to test it, we have to render a page. On Python 2.4, we can't do that.

Re: [tg-trunk] few improvements for the website

2011-05-17 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 17.05.2011 14:47 schrieb Alessandro Molina: Inside it there are two Of /2.1 and Of /2.0 links that when opened load an apache directory index instead of any page. Also the SiteLink is quite confusionary as it appears having both Documentation and Turbogears Documentation links one pointing to

Re: [tg-trunk] TG2 Status Update - May 9, 2011

2011-05-10 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 10.05.2011 05:38 schrieb Michael Pedersen: Christoph, once we get the Jenkins instance working the way we expect it to, would you mind working out the details of getting TG1 projects properly building there? I'd like to have all of our projects showing up properly. Ok, I'll care for that.

Re: [tg-trunk] TG2 Status Update - Apr 18, 2011

2011-04-25 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 25.04.2011 18:08 schrieb Christoph Zwerschke: It will be good to have a virtual host anyway, so that we can do some redirects to better mimic the old MoinMoin wiki (e.g. redirect URLs without .html suffix). Also, docs.turbogears.org should redirect to the page at http://beta.turbogears.org

Re: [tg-trunk] TG2 Status Update - Apr 18, 2011

2011-04-19 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 19.04.2011 06:01 schrieb Michael Pedersen: Christoph, will you be able to get through the 1.x docs this week? And it's okay to say no, I'm just wanting to find out if we can plan the DNS changeover for the coming weekend. I'll try to do it tomorrow, but it would help if I can get some

Re: [tg-trunk] Re: [TurboGears] TG2 Status Update April 11, 2011

2011-04-17 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Today I worked on the MoinMoin - Sphinx conversion. Even though we already used ReST format, it was still quite time-consuming, particularly because I tried to retain as much material as possible (we can still throw parts of it away later, but I wanted to have it archived in the repository).

Re: [tg-trunk] Just seen new doc

2011-04-05 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 06.04.2011 00:49 schrieb Alessandro Molina: I have just seen http://beta.turbogears.org/2.1/docs/ and I think that it is awesome. Great work. An absolute improvement over the current 2.1 doc theme. Yes, thanks for merging that in, Mike. I had invested some time work into this new layout

Re: [tg-trunk] TG Trac and a Request

2011-04-04 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 04.04.2011 05:06 schrieb Michael Pedersen: Evening all. I'd like to ask people to do some simple tests for me overnight/tomorrow (i want to have this done before I send out my next status report). Looks good (enough) to me. -- Christoph -- You received this message because you are

Re: [tg-trunk] TG Project home on SF.net

2011-03-31 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 31.03.2011 15:02 schrieb Alessandro Molina: I have just noticed that turbogears.sf.net is currently set as the project home for TG2 project on sf.net. It might have sense to update that to http://turbogears.org/ to avoid problems for new users that found the project searching for a framework

Re: [tg-trunk] TG2 Status Update - Mar 21, 2011

2011-03-26 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
I have now migrated the Subversion repository from the old TurboGears server (http://svn.turbogears.org) to SourceForge (https://sourceforge.net/p/turbogears1/code/). The transfer took several hours since the SVN repository is huge: It contains the hisotry of the complete website with all the

Re: [tg-trunk] TG2 Status Update - Mar 21, 2011

2011-03-24 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Thanks. I hope we can then finish the Trac migration this weekend. -- Christoph Am 24.03.2011 05:08 schrieb Mark Ramm: That should be fixed now. Rabbitmq failures at the time of the ticket entry meant they were in mongo but not solr. New updates to allura should mean this will never happen

Re: [tg-trunk] Minor Mid Week Update

2011-03-11 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 11.03.2011 05:25 schrieb Michael Pedersen: DNS updates are propagating right now. Tomorrow morning we'll be able to switch beta.turbogears.org http://beta.turbogears.org to the new server, and begin working on the details of what content goes where. It's important that docs.turbgoears.org

Re: [tg-trunk] Minor Mid Week Update

2011-03-10 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Hi Michael, I've created a similar TG1 tracker on SF now and also started moving the tickets. I'm always adding a link to the SF ticket as a comment in the Trac ticket, and then close the Trac ticket as duplicate. I suggest we do the same with the TG2 tickets, so we can see which tickets have

Re: [tg-trunk] (1.5) Trac rejections

2011-03-09 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 09.03.2011 05:44, schrieb Ken Kuhlman: Unfortunately Trac has decided that I'm a spammer, so I can't create, assign, or note tickets. Should I wait until we're using Allura? I see there's a turbogears1 project on sourceforge now. Anything I can do to help? Right, I've closed a few TG1

Re: [tg-trunk] Re: tg 2.1+ and nosetests

2011-03-09 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 09.03.2011 05:55 schrieb Michael Pedersen: Now that my test cases are finally passing cleanly, I can get to work on migrating tickets and applying patches as appropriate. Thanks, Michael. It's important to keep our test suite clean. We should install Hudson/Jenkins on Florent's server once

Re: [tg-trunk] Another suggestion for the Trac migration

2011-03-07 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 07.03.2011 02:15 schrieb Mark Ramm: I have no objections to this approach. As for the TG2 as sf.net location, I'm partial to /p/turbogears2/ but can be persuaded by somebody with a strong argument/ Ok, so let's follow that plan now. I'm also for using turbogears1 and turbogears2 as

Re: [tg-trunk] Another suggestion for the Trac migration

2011-03-06 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 05.03.2011 19:43 schrieb Michael Pedersen: I'm not about to leave you alone for it. I'll help. I'll start looking at the 2.x tickets tonight. Does that mean you agree with me that we should start on SF with a clean plate? We could then create these new Allura trackers for TG1 and TG2

[tg-trunk] Another suggestion for the Trac migration

2011-03-05 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
As already posted, one of the things that is hampering us for too long already is the migration of our old Trac. We actually wanted to move to SF to minimize the admin work, but it turned out to make more work as expected, and I'm still doubt how faithful/useful the migrated tickets and

Re: [tg-trunk] Another suggestion for the Trac migration

2011-03-05 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 05.03.2011 13:19 schrieb Christoph Zwerschke: * simple - do it immediately and close * more complex - manually enter them in Allura and close in Trac * irrelevant, outdated, not reproducable etc. - just close In the last category, we could already clarify the tickets, add ideas for solutions

Re: [tg-trunk] Re: Trac Migration Status Update

2011-02-27 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 27.02.2011 04:42 schrieb Christopher Arndt: You can run Trac on a read-only slave of a repository. I've done that in the past. If needed, I can look for the necessary scripts to set up a Subversion repository replication. Actually our goal was to simplify the infrastructure, not complicate

Re: [tg-trunk] Re: Trac Migration Status Update

2011-02-27 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 27.02.2011 18:12 schrieb Felix Schwarz: So if you have problems/questions I'm glad if I can help out (also speaking as a Trac/Babel/Bitten developer). Thanks, Felix. The current status is that Mark wants to give Allura another chance. So I'm waiting for the outcome of that since it's our

Re: [tg-trunk] Re: TG2 Weekly Status Update - February 14, 2011

2011-02-22 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 22.02.2011 11:34, schrieb Florent Aide: As I said above we wanted a TG2 showcase and we wanted flexibility. I think that some of the applications that we have on this server can still be usefull. Thanks, Florent. I think we should follow that route, we already wanted to do that a long time

Re: [tg-trunk] Re: TG2 Weekly Status Update - February 14, 2011

2011-02-17 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 17.02.2011 16:18 schrieb Michael Pedersen: So, what's the difference between using Trac tasks and flow.io http://flow.io? Especially if we throw in something like a gantt chart plugin? (I have seen that one, even used it, so I know it exists and does well). Especially since people can be on

Re: [tg-trunk] Re: TG2 Weekly Status Update - February 14, 2011

2011-02-17 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 17.02.2011 17:50 schrieb Michael Pedersen: I'll get myself logged into it tonight and check it out. I'm not going to promise anything. I will say that it looks promising, though. Then again, github looks promising, too. Part of me wonders if we might not be better off with github vs SF, too.

Re: [tg-trunk] Re: TG2 Weekly Status Update - February 14, 2011

2011-02-17 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 17.02.2011 23:36 schrieb Mark Ramm: I'll talk to folks on this end and make sure we get the migration API docs pushed out into a publicly accessible place. Thanks, Mark. Maybe the export/import scripts are already sufficient for our needs, but that would help anyway. We probably need to

Re: [tg-trunk] Re: TG2 Weekly Status Update - February 14, 2011

2011-02-16 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 16.02.2011 03:47 schrieb Michael Pedersen: You missed the documentation being fixed. That, in fact, is the only item on my list that you didn't mention. We're definitely agreeing on the needs of TG2. Right, documentation is also important for me. Btw, don't forget I've already worked on

Re: [tg-trunk] Re: TG2 Weekly Status Update - February 14, 2011

2011-02-16 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 17.02.2011 04:48 schrieb Michael Pedersen: I'll admit to being confused still: Which machine is Florent's? Where does the current www.turbogears.org http://www.turbogears.org actually point? Ok, that obviously needs clarification: www.turbogears.org is our old server where all of the

Re: [tg-trunk] Re: TG2 Weekly Status Update - February 14, 2011

2011-02-15 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 15.02.2011 14:47, schrieb Alessandro Molina: On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 2:34 PM, jorge.var...@gmail.com jorge.var...@gmail.com wrote: Both the methods you suggest have been tried before and both have failed. Forcing our pypi index, has the opposite problem, if there is a mayor security

Re: [tg-trunk] Re: TG2 Weekly Status Update - February 14, 2011

2011-02-15 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 15.02.2011 16:15, schrieb Michael Pedersen: This is a viable way of specifying the requirements, definitely. I'd actually go with 0.7 and 0.8, though. The problem with that is that setuptools considers 0.7a1, 0.7b1, 0.7rc1 all 0.7 (which makes some sense). So 0.7a1 is probably what you

Re: [tg-trunk] Re: TG2 Weekly Status Update - February 14, 2011

2011-02-15 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 15.02.2011 16:46, schrieb Christophe de Vienne: What about 0.7dev ? Right, 0.7dev is sorted even before 0.7a with the current setuptools and distutils: from pkg_resources import parse_version as V V('0.7.dev1') == V('0.7dev1') V('0.7a1') V('0.7b1') V('0.7') True However, 0.7dev is not

Re: [tg-trunk] TG2.1 Weekly Status Update, Feb 7, 2011

2011-02-13 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 12.02.2011 22:04 schrieb Michael Pedersen: Okay, I've managed to get logged into the sf.net http://sf.net web, and tested out uploading data to it. I've been able to upload a test page, and retrieve it afterwards. Another progress I just noticed is that the hosted apps and other tools have

Re: [tg-trunk] TG2.1 Weekly Status Update, Feb 7, 2011

2011-02-08 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Thanks for the update, Mike. Such updates are helpful even if not much has been done so as to identify where things are hanging. Regarding the migration of tickets we're currently stuck because as far as I see Trac has not yet been activated on SF (must be done manually by SF staff for the

  1   2   3   4   >