On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 10:10 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've had a request to do an official release that includes the fix for
TUSCANY-2304. I think this is reasonable so would like to do this, it
shouldn't be too hard as its a small fix so its just copying the 1.2 release
tag,
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 11:02 PM, Gilbert Kwan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I got following exception in running where the wsdl defines an
operation without input parameter.
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Pass-by-value is not supported for
the given object
at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12597382#action_12597382
]
Simon Nash commented on TUSCANY-2324:
-
Disclaimer: I haven't yet looked at the code.
...snip
The two sets of SPIs could co-exist for a while with BindingProviders
working with bindings and ServiceProviders (I just made up that name) with
service endpoints.
--
Jean-Sebastien
At r656959 I've just enabled some changes to take a step toward using an
Endpoint representation in
On 5/16/08, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Simon Nash wrote:
... snip
I believe that if we are serious about making OSGi-enablement of Tuscany
a
first class option, we should consider doing 1). For the longer term to
support versioning of 3rd party
Hi Oscar,
My mistake again, the eclipse project files of contribution-impl module were
not uploaded, so you are probably using the modules you have downloaded from
the sca modules. If you remove the tuscany-contribution-impl from your
workspace and add this module from the sandbox it will
Hi,
I've just tried building the latest trunk of Tuscany and I'm getting a
compile failure in the new endpoint module. The error I am getting is:
[INFO]
[INFO] Error for project: Apache Tuscany SCA Default Endpoint
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-1534.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Done as part of the latest round of reference/binding/endpoint changes.
This problem has now been fixed in SVN revision r657009
Thanks,
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Mark Combellack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 May 2008 11:26
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Endpoints was: Re: [BRAINSTORM] Flexibility in distributed
Hi,
Regarding Mike's build breaking comment, one of the reasons for
including this in the main build is to have it break to flag when new
dependencies are being introduced. This will help us focus on
improving Tuscany modularity, but also help us preserve the support
for running in OSGi. It
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 12:44 PM, Graham Charters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
Regarding Mike's build breaking comment, one of the reasons for
including this in the main build is to have it break to flag when new
dependencies are being introduced. This will help us focus on
improving
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 1:05 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 12:44 PM, Graham Charters
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Regarding Mike's build breaking comment, one of the reasons for
including this in the main build is to have it break to flag when new
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-2277:
---
Assignee: Simon Laws (was: Ramkumar Ramalingam)
Standardization of registering msg with
Below are a couple of runs, one taking 2 mins 50s and the second
taking 1 min 8s. Both were done after mvn cleans so the difference is
maybe due to my machine being under spec and paging.
[INFO]
[INFO] Reactor Summary:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12597473#action_12597473
]
Simon Laws commented on TUSCANY-2277:
-
Hi Ram
Was just trying to apply these patches
Graham Charters wrote:
Below are a couple of runs, one taking 2 mins 50s and the second
taking 1 min 8s. Both were done after mvn cleans so the difference is
maybe due to my machine being under spec and paging.
[INFO]
Simon Nash wrote:
I am surprised to hear that. I would expect a different interface
object to be created for each different interface element appearing
in the SCDL.
Hmm, my experience recently with the BPEL code shows that the handling of interfaces within Tuscany
is not so clean.
I'll
For my 1 cent on this point.
The BPEL code is still raw at this stage and I feel it could do with a few more tweaks before it is
really ready for prime time - I certainly still have a lot of trouble getting it to work - and I'm
working on it!!
Yours, Mike.
Luciano Resende wrote:
In the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2247?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12597491#action_12597491
]
Kevin Williams commented on TUSCANY-2247:
-
Leaving this open until resolution of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2092?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-2092:
---
Assignee: Simon Laws (was: Ramkumar Ramalingam)
ConcurrentModificationException in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2092?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-2092.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks for the patch Ram. Committed at 657093
ConcurrentModificationException
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2283?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-2283:
---
Assignee: Simon Laws
Conversation should end due to non-business exception
Hi Raymond,
One minor netiquette comment... Looks like you used a Reply To
button when generating your note (then changed the subject line). Some
mail readers will still group your email in the previous email thread
(one example is Mac OS X Mail). This can cause emails to be lost/cause
Why do we need to be so strict in comparing interfaces?
Can't we argue essentially the same point in the case with we have a Java
client w/ reference w/ Java intf with a binding.ws?
So, following this logic, it's suggested that the NS calculated per-JAXWS
for the Java intf must match the
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 4:45 PM, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Is there interest in tighter integration between Tuscany/Geronimo? Would
there be interest in generating a Tuscany Plugin for Geronimo? Running
Tuscany as a service?
--kevan
Yes! I think that would be really
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dan Becker updated TUSCANY-2290:
Attachment: TUSCANY-2290.1.patch
New patch generated based on comments in Tuscany dev group.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dan Becker updated TUSCANY-2290:
Attachment: (was: TUSCANY-2290.patch)
Java 2 Security enablement for Tuscany sample (part
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
I'd like to suggest the following:
- Keep the Java2 security blocks in test case classes
- Don't put them in sample program classes
Hmmm but looking at these test cases, could you help me understand why
we need these technical API calls to the jmsBroker at all?
Mike Edwards wrote:
For my 1 cent on this point.
The BPEL code is still raw at this stage and I feel it could do with a
few more tweaks before it is really ready for prime time - I certainly
still have a lot of trouble getting it to work - and I'm working on it!!
I'm not familiar with the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12597544#action_12597544
]
Ramkumar Ramalingam commented on TUSCANY-2277:
--
Hi Simon,
The issue seems to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ramkumar Ramalingam updated TUSCANY-2277:
-
Attachment: TUSCANY-2277-Part1-New.rtf
Standardization of registering msg
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ramkumar Ramalingam updated TUSCANY-2277:
-
Attachment: (was: TUSCANY-2277-Part1-New.rtf)
Standardization of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ramkumar Ramalingam updated TUSCANY-2277:
-
Attachment: TUSCANY-2277-Part1-New.patch
Standardization of registering msg
Scott Kurz wrote:
Why do we need to be so strict in comparing interfaces?
Can't we argue essentially the same point in the case with we have a Java
client w/ reference w/ Java intf with a binding.ws?
So, following this logic, it's suggested that the NS calculated per-JAXWS
for the Java intf
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ramkumar Ramalingam updated TUSCANY-2277:
-
Attachment: (was: TUSCANY-2277-Part1-New.patch)
Standardization of
Please see my comments below.
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 1:26 AM
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Endpoints was: Re: [BRAINSTORM] Flexibility in distributed
operation and extension
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ramkumar Ramalingam updated TUSCANY-2277:
-
Attachment: TUSCANY-2277-Part2-New.patch
Standardization of registering msg
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ramkumar Ramalingam updated TUSCANY-2277:
-
Attachment: TUSCANY-2277-Part3-New.patch
Standardization of registering msg
Hi,
Which version of Tuscany are you trying? It seems that something went wrong
in the bootstrap (we need to dig out the root cause of the exception). Can
you also try on Tomcat 6.x?
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: Magnus Stoveland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I'm starting to look into the performance improvements in the JAXB/AXIOM
data transformation. It seems that the Axis2 1.4 has done a lot of good work
there. If possible, I would like to leverage the latest AXIOM and Axis2 code
base ASAP. The dependency might be only AXIOM but mixing the
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 1:04 PM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scott Kurz wrote:
Why do we need to be so strict in comparing interfaces?
Can't we argue essentially the same point in the case with we have a Java
client w/ reference w/ Java intf with a binding.ws?
So, following this
Scott Kurz wrote:
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 1:04 PM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scott Kurz wrote:
Why do we need to be so strict in comparing interfaces?
Can't we argue essentially the same point in the case with we have a Java
client w/ reference w/ Java intf with a binding.ws?
So,
Schema validation does not register the exception with the Problem, yet Problem
looks for it and finds it to be not-null
Key: TUSCANY-2325
Ant mentioned rampart is not ready yet. Doesen't that require us to wait?
-Original Message-
From: Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 11:14 AM
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Tuscany support for Axis 1.4
Hi,
I'm starting to look into
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2295?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Luciano Resende resolved TUSCANY-2295.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed by using DefaultValidationSchemaExtensionPoint that will
45 matches
Mail list logo
