Hey.
I'm trying to use TWSocket to send UDP messages to many different hosts. I
want to create the TWSocket dynamically, and I don't want to have to use
Connect/Close every time I send a UDP message. I thought I could use the
SendTo() procedure to do this, but I have had no success. This is
Francois,
Just found the problem.
There were lots of messages generated due to a wrong reference.
Paul
- Original Message -
From: "Francois PIETTE" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ICS support mailing"
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 7:47 PM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Weird problem sending htt
> I have a routine to send a stream with http (Post).
> The first time I send a stream, there is a delay of about 20 seconds
> between the PostAsync instruction end the triggering of the
> onRequestdone event.
> No errors detected
> During this time, there is no traffic.
When is the stream data se
That's an interesting contribution !
Thank you.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.overbyte.be
- Original Message -
From: "Fastream Technologies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ICS support mailing"
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 1:50 PM
Subject: [twsocket] THttpServer Digest Auth implemented with
TNX
Roberto Della Pasqua
Http: www.dellapasqua.com
Email/Msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aol/Yahoo: DellaPasquaR
Icq: 164672275
-
This e-mail and any attachment contain information which is privileged and
confidential and is intended for the addressee only. If you have
I run into something weird.
I have a routine to send a stream with http (Post).
The first time I send a stream, there is a delay of about 20 seconds
between the PostAsync instruction end the triggering of the
onRequestdone event.
No errors detected
During this time, there is no traffic.
If this f
> Is the latest ICS sure for overflow attacks?
Yes, it is. But some application may not be secure if not correctly
developed ! The application programmer _muust_ take care of many problems
the component can't do for him. For example, if your application receive
data and buffer incomming data wa
Arno Garrels wrote:
> Maurizio Lotauro wrote:
>> Scrive Arno Garrels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> I think they arn't so smart, but just calling LogOnUser() note
>>> that [EMAIL PROTECTED] valid, not only for FTP-proxies.
>>
>> I don't think that the server use LogOnUser to authenticat
Maurizio Lotauro wrote:
> Scrive Arno Garrels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> [...]
>
>> I think they arn't so smart, but just calling LogOnUser() note
>> that [EMAIL PROTECTED] valid, not only for FTP-proxies.
>
> I don't think that the server use LogOnUser to authenticate the request
> because with N
Arno Garrels schrieb:
>
> Stadin, Benjamin wrote:
>
> > I think it should be handled without
> > a new property.
>
> Why not just copy what NTLM implementation as well as function
> LogonUser() already provide? Even Internet Explorer pops up a
> dialog with an additional Domain-field upon NTLM auth
Scrive Arno Garrels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[...]
> I think they arn't so smart, but just calling LogOnUser() note
> that [EMAIL PROTECTED] valid, not only for FTP-proxies.
I don't think that the server use LogOnUser to authenticate the request
because with NTLM it will not receive the password i
Scrive Tibor Csonka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I would like to correct the bug report I posted before:
[...]
> A new property for the domain can be added for proxy auth and
> separatelly for web auth or a property in which users can set the domain
> name separator this can be one for each of the
Hi dear developers,
Please check the thread in borland.public.delphi.non-technical (borland nntp
server)
First post:
"Hi all,
We know that by using the standart VCL functions it is impossible to create
a stack overflow condition in delphi-written applications.But how about Heap
Based overflo
Scrive Francois PIETTE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > That is what I ment also. Now the question is that should or should not
> > ICS allow other separators than backslash?
>
> Should ICS be responsible for domain/user parsing out of a single property
> or should a new property with domain added ?
I
Scrive Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> You can't know what the proxy wants,
> so you have to test all possible situations and
> pick the one that works
> As Maurizio said, some users have to add the domain
> and some not (on the same proxy!)
Is it possible for you to test with proxy that need [EMAIL
Scrive Tibor Csonka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[...]
> >You have a similar situation with IIS? I mean, if you don't include the
> domain
> >you will be authenticated?
> >
> >
> It seemes to me that you have the same problem as me. Try to separe the
> user and the domain. If it works let me know so
Stadin, Benjamin wrote:
> I think it should be handled without
> a new property.
Why not just copy what NTLM implementation as well as function
LogonUser() already provide? Even Internet Explorer pops up a
dialog with an additional Domain-field upon NTLM authentications.
With two new Domain-prope
At my former working place we had an MS Exchange email server and several NT
Domains. The domains had different trustships between each other. In the
exchange webmail you are only asked for username and password. Users who
don't belong to the main domain but one of the trusted domains had to use
"d
> Yes, but those are not NTLM proxies imo.
> They are just transparent FTP proxies.
I have run into problems with Http NTLM proxies
Paul
- Original Message -
From: "Francois PIETTE" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ICS support mailing"
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 12:51 PM
Subject: Re: [twso
Hello Francois and Everybody,
We (me and Peter Nikolow) worked on Digest authentication for ICS
THttpServer. We used Delphi and ICS v5 (unit version 1.38) for the
httpsrv.pas and C++ for the test unit. We (fastream.com) want to donate the
code to our very community. I urge you (Francois) to mak
Arno Garrels wrote:
>
>> From MSDN:
>
> "lpszUsername
> [in] A pointer to a null-terminated string that specifies the name of the
> user. This is the name of the user account to log on to. If you use the
> user principal name (UPN) format, [EMAIL PROTECTED], the lpszDomain
> parameter must be NUL
Francois PIETTE wrote:
>>> Should ICS be responsible for domain/user parsing out of a single
>>> property
>>> or should a new property with domain added ?
>>
>> I think not, unless the component itself test for the combination that
>> works.
>
> That's not logical. The NTLM message has two differ
I would like to correct the bug report I posted before:
There is no way to set domain for NTLM authentication neither for web
server or proxy in ICS HttpProt.
A mechanism should be included in the future releases.
A new property for the domain can be added for proxy auth and
separatelly for web
>>Should ICS be responsible for domain/user parsing out of a single property
>>or should a new property with domain added ?
>>
>>
> I can see your point here. For me is more simpler for now to leave it
> like that, but I think ICS _should not_ handle the separation; it is
> much better to expose se
>> Should ICS be responsible for domain/user parsing out of a single
>> property
>> or should a new property with domain added ?
>
> I think not, unless the component itself test for the combination that
> works.
That's not logical. The NTLM message has two different parts for domain name
and us
>> Paul, can you give me examples, where you can configure Proxy/Web server
>> with NTLM in the way you pointed out?
>
> You won't find this strange format in M$ proxies, but there lots of
> proxies
> available.
> The ones that requires [EMAIL PROTECTED] are mostly used with ftp
Yes, but those ar
>Should ICS be responsible for domain/user parsing out of a single property
>or should a new property with domain added ?
>
>
I can see your point here. For me is more simpler for now to leave it
like that, but I think ICS _should not_ handle the separation; it is
much better to expose separa
Anyway the user tweaks like this separation character should not be the
concern of ICS but of the application with the functionality.
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website at http://www.ov
> Should ICS be responsible for domain/user parsing out of a single property
> or should a new property with domain added ?
I think not, unless the component itself test for the combination that
works.
PAul
- Original Message -
From: "Francois PIETTE" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ICS suppo
> Personally I didn't saw usernames like [EMAIL PROTECTED] until now in windows.
> Paul, can you give me examples, where you can configure Proxy/Web server
> with NTLM in the way you pointed out?
You won't find this strange format in M$ proxies, but there lots of proxies
available.
The ones that r
> That is what I ment also. Now the question is that should or should not
> ICS allow other separators than backslash?
Should ICS be responsible for domain/user parsing out of a single property
or should a new property with domain added ?
> And the second question that on the proxy authenticatio
That is what I ment also. Now the question is that should or should not
ICS allow other separators than backslash?
And the second question that on the proxy authentication part should we
use the same technique?
Personally I didn't saw usernames like [EMAIL PROTECTED] until now in windows.
Paul,
> is it possible to create a form with a message loop with api
> and still use the http async methods ?
>
> This will shrink the total application size with almost 300K
as I understand, what you want/need is not a form (a form is a Delphi object
derived from TForm). It is a window (It is a Window
> It seemes to me that you have the same problem as me. Try to separe the
> user and the domain. If it works let me know so I can patch the proxy
> part of NTLM auth too.
> Without domain the user will not be authenticated, I tried.
I think you are right. Since NtlmGetMessage3 has provision for do
Hello Mac,
> How i implement a timeout control in HttpCli...
Use async call's and a timer. when timer expires call abort, when request
is done disable timer.
> I using HttpCli in sync mode, because i need to run it in Thread..
You can use async mode in a thread as well. There is no differen
35 matches
Mail list logo
