Angus Robertson - Magenta Systems Ltd wrote:
Ping IPv6 seems to be working now, do you want to test it?
Trace Route to: ipv6.google.com
Ping of 56 bytes took 29 msecs
1 0ms 2a01:348:6:68c::2 PC19
2 8ms 2a01:348:6:68c::1 gw-1677.lon-02.gb.sixxs.net
311ms
Ohh this is awesome! I'll try to test it as well, probably next week too.
Tks!
El 13/02/2013 02:21 p.m., Arno Garrels escribió:
Angus Robertson - Magenta Systems Ltd wrote:
Ping IPv6 seems to be working now, do you want to test it?
Trace Route to: ipv6.google.com
Ping of 56 bytes took 29
Cool, I'll be able to test it a bit next weekend.
No problem, just need to test it with XE3 and 64-bit, and find out why
the sample no longer runs on XP.
Although we've always been used to a blocking ping, it transpires
Microsoft added async ping using a callback with Windows 2000, which I
I'm doing some eval of this components but i found that the
TPing component doesn't support IPv6 at the moment (ICS version 8).
Am i right? or, may be i missed some component initialization call.
Ping IPv6 seems to be working now, do you want to test it?
Trace Route to: ipv6.google.com
Hello!
I'm doing some eval of this components but i found that the TPing
component doesn't support IPv6 at the moment (ICS version 8).
Am i right? or, may be i missed some component initialization call.
Tks!
Mauro
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please
Mauro Ubeda wrote:
Hello!
I'm doing some eval of this components but i found that the TPing
component doesn't support IPv6 at the moment (ICS version 8).
Am i right?
Yes, you are right.
--
Arno
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto
I'm doing some eval of this components but i found that the
TPing component doesn't support IPv6 at the moment (ICS version 8).
I'm planning to update TPing to support IPv6 and the correct DLL in
February, I need for my applications.
Angus
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for
Tks for your support!
El 24/01/2013 03:45 p.m., Arno Garrels escribió:
Mauro Ubeda wrote:
Hello!
I'm doing some eval of this components but i found that the TPing
component doesn't support IPv6 at the moment (ICS version 8).
Am i right?
Yes, you are right.
--
To unsubscribe or change
what is the status of IPv6 with ICS ?
Arno has put a lot of effort into adding IPv6 over the last year in ICS
v8, but I have been very slow to test it.
I got my ICS web server listening on multiple IP addresses including IPv6
last week, and am slowly testing the other components and demos.
what is the status of IPv6 with ICS ?
Already working, thanks to Arno !
See SVN repository branch icsipv6.
--
francois.pie...@overbyte.be
The author of the freeware multi-tier middleware MidWare
The author of the freeware Internet Component Suite (ICS)
http://www.overbyte.be
--
To
Thanks to all
I'll check is this weekend
Paul
- Original Message -
From: François Piette francois.pie...@skynet.be
To: 'ICS support mailing' twsocket@elists.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 9:54 AM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Ipv6
what is the status of IPv6 with ICS ?
Already
Hi,
what is the status of IPv6 with ICS ?
Thanks,
Paul
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
In order to be able to set TWSocket.SocketFamily to anything
else but sfIPv4 you have to tell TWSocket to use winsock DLL v2.2
by setting both properties ReqVerLow and ReqVerHigh to 2.
These are the defaults in ICS IPv6, however if you update
old projects with TWSocket components dropped on forms
Arno Garrels wrote:
There's an IPv6-branch at:
svn://svn.overbyte.be/ics/branches/icsipv6
Both user and password = ics
It lacks recent changes of trunk (a few weeks) and is still
experimental. Feedback is welcome.
I just merged all recent changes from trunk (actually those from march
to
Arno,
On this subject, does ICS team plans to release official support for IPv6?
Eric
-Mensagem Original-
From: Arno Garrels
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 3:16 PM
To: ICS support mailing
Subject: Re: [twsocket] IPv6 support ?
Max Terentiev wrote:
Does ICS v6-v7 support IPv6
On this subject, does ICS team plans to release official support for IPv6?
Arno already done most of the work, so yes it is intended to release it
someday.
We need testers and you are welcome to participate.
As you probably know, Embarcadero is preparing the next release. ICS must be
ready
Hi,
Does ICS v6-v7 support IPv6 ?
Can't find any info about it at overbyte.be
Thanx !
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
There was an effort but IIRC it needs testing. You can download the source
from the SVN repository.
Regards,
SZ
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 18:20, Max Terentiev maxterent...@mail.ru wrote:
Hi,
Does ICS v6-v7 support IPv6 ?
Can't find any info about it at overbyte.be
Thanx !
--
To
Max Terentiev wrote:
Does ICS v6-v7 support IPv6 ?
Current ICSv7 doeas not.
There's an IPv6-branch at:
svn://svn.overbyte.be/ics/branches/icsipv6
Both user and password = ics
It lacks recent changes of trunk (a few weeks) and is still
experimental. Feedback is welcome.
--
Arno Garrels
--
Ok, managed the SVN. Now what should I do for an IPv4 ICS client/server to
upgrade to IPv6? I saw almost no documentation in the source. Can
applications support both protocols with no modification or must one make a
separate listening/target IP per v4 and v6?
Regards,
SZ
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010
Fastream Technologies wrote:
Ok, managed the SVN. Now what should I do for an IPv4 ICS
client/server to upgrade to IPv6? I saw almost no documentation in
the source. Can applications support both protocols with no
modification or must one make a separate listening/target IP per v4
and v6?
I
Hello,
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Arno Garrels arno.garr...@gmx.de wrote:
Fastream Technologies wrote:
Ok, managed the SVN. Now what should I do for an IPv4 ICS
client/server to upgrade to IPv6? I saw almost no documentation in
the source. Can applications support both protocols
Hello,
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Arno Garrels arno.garr...@gmx.de wrote:
Fastream Technologies wrote:
As you said the below function and the design that is forcing it is
not good. Perhaps we should have Addrv6 property which will be null
if Addr (v4) is filled and vice versa.
Please learn to quote:
http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote2.html#ss2.1
Fastream Technologies wrote:
As you said the below function and the design that is forcing it is
not good. Perhaps we should have Addrv6 property which will be null
if Addr (v4) is filled and vice versa.
That's
I have an idea. I think the only time we need multiple listening is with
0.0.0.0;::0 since this is for the all unassigned case in IIS. (In IIS you
cannot enter the IP your self now but select from a combo box.) We can add a
special string handler for the all IPv4/6 unassigned and do the second
Hi Arno,
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Arno Garrels arno.garr...@gmx.de wrote:
Fastream Technologies wrote:
Ok, somehow the packages got mixed and the defines were wrong.
Anyway, can you try to compile the latest IPv6 package with NO_ADV_MT
defined? It bombs in web server component!
Fastream Technologies wrote:
Hi Arno,
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Arno Garrels arno.garr...@gmx.de
wrote:
Fastream Technologies wrote:
Ok, somehow the packages got mixed and the defines were wrong.
Anyway, can you try to compile the latest IPv6 package with
NO_ADV_MT defined? It
Arno, Thanks for the detailed explanation.
SZ
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Arno Garrels arno.garr...@gmx.de wrote:
Fastream Technologies wrote:
Hi Arno,
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Arno Garrels arno.garr...@gmx.de
wrote:
Fastream Technologies wrote:
Ok, somehow the
Fastream Technologies wrote:
Ok, somehow the packages got mixed and the defines were wrong.
Anyway, can you try to compile the latest IPv6 package with NO_ADV_MT
defined? It bombs in web server component!
Thanks, it's fixed now and checked in.
--
Arno Garrels
--
To unsubscribe or change
See subject.
--
Arno Garrels
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
Dear Arno,
Here is the first impression with the new IPv6 code. Package compile with
our defines went well. However in the project, it gave the following error
on Winsock2.hpp:
http://www.fastream.com/ics/icsipv6error.png
Hope you can help. Our unit httpmtsrv inherits from
Also, as I have asked before, can you make:
procedure CheckDelaySetReady; { 09/26/08 ML }
in httpprot.pas as virtual?
Regards,
SZ
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Fastream Technologies
ga...@fastream.comwrote:
Dear Arno,
Here is the first impression with the
Fastream Technologies wrote:
Also, as I have asked before, can you make:
procedure CheckDelaySetReady; { 09/26/08
ML }
in httpprot.pas as virtual?
Done in both trunk and IPv6.
with our defines went well. However in the project, it gave the
following error
Ok that's passed now with what you suggested. I now get the below AV:
http://www.fastream.com/ics/icsipv6error2.png
This is the first listening web server socket, for the admin interface...
Regards,
SZ
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 2:40 PM, Arno Garrels arno.garr...@gmx.de wrote:
Arno Garrels
Fastream Technologies wrote:
Ok that's passed now with what you suggested. I now get the below AV:
http://www.fastream.com/ics/icsipv6error2.png
This is the first listening web server socket, for the admin
interface...
This call stack makes no sense IMO.
TCustomSocksWSocket.Create calls
Hi again Arno,
Here is what I did:
- renamed the old ICS folder to something like ICS IPv4 backup
- checked out the code to a new folder with the old folder's name
- copied the old BCB2010 package's project files over so that I would not
have to re-enter all the defines
- cleared the project
Fastream Technologies wrote:
Hi again Arno,
Here is what I did:
- renamed the old ICS folder to something like ICS IPv4 backup
- checked out the code to a new folder with the old folder's name
- copied the old BCB2010 package's project files over so that I would
not have to re-enter all
Hello,
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Arno Garrels arno.garr...@gmx.de wrote:
Fastream Technologies wrote:
Hi again Arno,
Here is what I did:
- renamed the old ICS folder to something like ICS IPv4 backup
- checked out the code to a new folder with the old folder's name
- copied
Fastream Technologies wrote:
I have tried what you said but it still gives read of address
.
This is the problematic line:
adminHTTPServer = new THttpServer(NULL);
I know :)
Maybe you call it with a non-null parameter in your tests? But this
should also work because I need
Ok, somehow the packages got mixed and the defines were wrong. Anyway, can
you try to compile the latest IPv6 package with NO_ADV_MT defined? It bombs
in web server component!
Regards,
SZ
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Arno Garrels arno.garr...@gmx.de wrote:
Fastream Technologies wrote:
Hello,
I wonder if the tests that were going to be made for IPv6 support is done. I
have time for help conducting them but our ISP does not provide IPv6
addressing.
Regards,
SZ
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto
Fastream Technologies wrote:
Hello,
I wonder if the tests that were going to be made for IPv6 support is
done. I have time for help conducting them but our ISP does not
provide IPv6 addressing.
1) It would be nice if you test compatibility with standard IPv4.
Does the new source break
I will try to do the test ASAP, most probably on Tuesday. What is the
equivalent of 127.0.0.1 in IPv6?
Unfortunately we have a 5 years old router which does not support IPv6. The
reason we do not upgrade is because our office is so far from the telco
office that we have no chance of getting a
Fastream Technologies wrote:
I will try to do the test ASAP, most probably on Tuesday. What is the
equivalent of 127.0.0.1 in IPv6?
Before you start testing IPv6 you should read:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPv6
IPv6 localhost = ::1
--
Arno Garrels
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings
Thanks and one last question: What is the IPv6 equivalent of 0.0.0.0 ?
SZ
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Arno Garrels arno.garr...@gmx.de wrote:
Fastream Technologies wrote:
I will try to do the test ASAP, most probably on Tuesday. What is the
equivalent of 127.0.0.1 in IPv6?
Before
Fastream Technologies wrote:
Thanks and one last question: What is the IPv6 equivalent of 0.0.0.0 ?
IPv6 unspezified address = :: or ::0.
Including ::1 they are the short representations, zeros may be omitted.
--
Arno Garrels
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing
Hello,
We use TStringList quicksort/binary search routine I wrote for
caching--works so well that I can recommend.
Also, has anybody tested the IPv6 with listening/server components?
Best Regards,
SZ
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 10:04 PM, Francois PIETTE
francois.pie...@skynet.bewrote:
How
Fastream Technologies wrote:
Hello,
We use TStringList quicksort/binary search routine I wrote for
caching--works so well that I can recommend.
With many entries all TList-derrived classes are dog-slow
compared with binary search trees for this purpose!
Also, has anybody tested the IPv6
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Arno Garrels arno.garr...@gmx.de wrote:
Fastream Technologies wrote:
Hello,
We use TStringList quicksort/binary search routine I wrote for
caching--works so well that I can recommend.
With many entries all TList-derrived classes are dog-slow
compared
Fastream Technologies wrote:
We use TStringList quicksort/binary search routine I wrote for
caching--works so well that I can recommend.
With many entries all TList-derrived classes are dog-slow
compared with binary search trees for this purpose!
We are using Sorted=true; while adding
We use TStringList quicksort/binary search routine I wrote for
caching--works so well that I can recommend.
With many entries all TList-derrived classes are dog-slow
compared with binary search trees for this purpose!
Confirmed. I recently had a project with such issue. The result where
Hello,
Has the IPv6 async DNS resolving issue been resolved? How
many socket/threads?
Best Regards,
SZ
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 6:26 PM, Arno Garrels arno.garr...@gmx.de wrote:
Angus Robertson - Magenta Systems Ltd wrote:
FTP also still not supporting IPv6
FTP needs the EPRT and EPSV
Arno Garrels wrote:
Fastream Technologies wrote:
Hello,
Has the IPv6 async DNS resolving issue been resolved? How
many socket/threads?
There is a (hopefully) thread-safe new class which provides
async lookups. One global object of this class is allocated in
unit initialization with the
Hello,
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Arno Garrels arno.garr...@gmx.de wrote:
Arno Garrels wrote:
Fastream Technologies wrote:
Hello,
Has the IPv6 async DNS resolving issue been resolved? How
many socket/threads?
There is a (hopefully) thread-safe new class which provides
async
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Arno Garrels arno.garr...@gmx.de wrote:
Arno Garrels wrote:
Fastream Technologies wrote:
Hello,
Has the IPv6 async DNS resolving issue been resolved? How
many socket/threads?
There is a (hopefully) thread-safe new class which provides
async
Fastream Technologies wrote:
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Arno Garrels arno.garr...@gmx.de
wrote:
Arno Garrels wrote:
Fastream Technologies wrote:
Hello,
Has the IPv6 async DNS resolving issue been resolved? How
many socket/threads?
There is a (hopefully) thread-safe new class
How fast/slow this implementation works with thousands of
concurrent requests is of course untested. One DNS lookup may
take one or even multiple seconds in the worst case.
Shouldn't TWSocket have his own internal cache for DNS lookup ? Or maybe
instead of more complex TWSocket, maybe a
Hi,
I would like to test ICS with the IPv6 Technical Preview for Window 2000,
however cannot find a working download link on the internet.
Can anybody help?
--
Arno Garrels
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto
Arno Garrels wrote:
Hi,
I would like to test ICS with the IPv6 Technical Preview for Window
2000, however cannot find a working download link on the internet.
Can anybody help?
Someone sent me this link:
Angus Robertson - Magenta Systems Ltd wrote:
FTP also still not supporting IPv6
FTP needs the EPRT and EPSV commands to support IP6:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ftpext-ftp-over-ipv6-01
from 1998, but IP6 has been slow arriving. The latest version of
Serv-U supports these IP6
Hi,
When new property SocketFamily is set to sfAny method
DnsLookup may now return a list containing both IPv4 and IPv6
strings. Looks like Windows always returns IPv6 first.
The top item is also copied to string FDnsResult.
Should I change this order?
BTW.: I wrote some helper classes to
Not sure if it is the same issue but with our proxy server code with many
threads, the debugger sometimes gives AV on Wndproc when step run too.
SZ
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Arno Garrels arno.garr...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
When new property SocketFamily is set to sfAny method
DnsLookup
When new property SocketFamily is set to sfAny method
DnsLookup may now return a list containing both IPv4 and IPv6
strings. Looks like Windows always returns IPv6 first.
The top item is also copied to string FDnsResult.
Should I change this order?
An idea: Give the opportunity for the
RTT wrote:
Is happening here too, but only if I continue with the step over
debugging (F8) after the 4 thread are created. Never happened while
they are created. No idea if that's what you want to say with repeat
pressing F8 until the AV is raised.
The debugger will keep stepping the WmTest
I made a very simple test case which triggers the AV on different
hardware and Windows versions in both D7 and D2010 here.
However some German testers were not able to reproduce the issue,
very strange.
I cannot reproduce the issue.
I'm using Vista Ultimate 32 bit with all services packs
Currently I made one breaking change that IMO cannot be prevented without
tons of workaround code.
That is type change of TCustomWSocket public field/property sin from
TSockAddrIn to TSockAddrIn6. TSockAddrIn6 can be passed to all old
functions by typ casting it to TSockAddrIn and passing the
Fastream Technologies wrote:
Maybe it is another 64-bit Windows/debugger API issue? I am using
Win7 Pro x64 and had been using 64-bit XP and Vista for 4 years...
I do not think it's related to 64-Bit Windows. I tested and got the AV
with Delphi 7 and Delphi 2010 on XP-Pro SP3 (fully patched),
I said so because I had faced a WinXP/Vista x64 issue (BLUE SCREEN) which MS
fixed in Win7. I thought it might be something similar. BTW, did you see the
message I sent to you privately? It's been a while since I heard back from
you to my replies and I am beginning to think that it could be a spam
Fastream Technologies wrote:
I said so because I had faced a WinXP/Vista x64 issue (BLUE SCREEN)
which MS fixed in Win7. I thought it might be something similar. BTW,
did you see the message I sent to you privately? It's been a while
since I heard back from you to my replies and I am beginning
Fastream Technologies wrote:
Ok, no problem. BTW, we are very interested in OpenSSL accelerators
It's already included as an experimental feature since a while,
however there was zero feedback from developers owning accelerator
hardware yet. All you need to test is a system with an accelerator
Turned out to be more work than initially planned.
Maybe we should create a svn branch for it?
What makes you think another branch would be useful ?
--
francois.pie...@overbyte.be
http://www.overbyte.be
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto
Francois PIETTE wrote:
Turned out to be more work than initially planned.
Maybe we should create a svn branch for it?
What makes you think another branch would be useful ?
Better testing before it's finally commited to the main
branch. I did some general cleanup including removal of
all old
Turned out to be more work than initially planned.
Maybe we should create a svn branch for it?
What makes you think another branch would be useful ?
Better testing before it's finally commited to the main
branch.
OK, go on.
--
francois.pie...@overbyte.be
The author of the freeware
FTP also still not supporting IPv6
FTP needs the EPRT and EPSV commands to support IP6:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ftpext-ftp-over-ipv6-01
from 1998, but IP6 has been slow arriving. The latest version of Serv-U
supports these IP6 commands.
I did check with my ISP about IP6,
Are there any plans for the near future ?
Paul
- Original Message -
From: Francois Piette francois.pie...@skynet.be
To: ICS support mailing twsocket@elists.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 11:53 AM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Ipv6
Any plans yet ?
Not yet.
btw: Does OpenSSL support
Paul
- Original Message -
From: Francois Piette francois.pie...@skynet.be
To: ICS support mailing twsocket@elists.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 11:53 AM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Ipv6
Any plans yet ?
Not yet.
btw: Does OpenSSL support IPv6 ?
--
francois.pie...@overbyte.be
Hi , i'm using the MultipartHttpDownloader component in my application ,But
i want to know how to be able to download multiple Files
--
Many thanks
-
Yours Randy
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto
Arno said...
If ICS shall not die very soon it has to be implemented anyway!
Wow! Scared of that statement! What do you mean by that? Is ICS in danger
of going away?
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto
Hi , i'm using the MultipartHttpDownloader component in my application
,But
i want to know how to be able to download multiple Files
As with regular HTTP client: use one component per file.
--
francois.pie...@overbyte.be
The author of the freeware multi-tier middleware MidWare
The author of
If ICS shall not die very soon it has to be implemented anyway!
Wow! Scared of that statement! What do you mean by that?
Is ICS in danger of going away?
Not at all.
--
francois.pie...@overbyte.be
The author of the freeware multi-tier middleware MidWare
The author of the freeware Internet
Hoby Smith wrote:
Arno said...
If ICS shall not die very soon it has to be implemented anyway!
Wow! Scared of that statement! What do you mean by that? Is ICS in
danger of going away?
No, not as long as there are people using and supporting it actively.
However users will move to another
I don't think it's very urgent, but the complaint I got from a US customer
says that it's use is on the way.
Paul
- Original Message -
From: Arno Garrels arno.garr...@gmx.de
No, not as long as there are people using and supporting it actively.
However users will move to another
Hello!
No, not as long as there are people using and supporting it actively.
However users will move to another component suite when they need basic
features not included in ICS. IMO IPv6 will become such a basic feature
rather soon. Competitors of ICS already support IPv6.
And IMAP4 :
--
Piotr Dałek wrote:
Hello!
No, not as long as there are people using and supporting it actively.
However users will move to another component suite when they need
basic
features not included in ICS. IMO IPv6 will become such a basic
feature rather soon. Competitors of ICS already support
Any plans yet ?
I got my first complaint from a customer
Paul
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
Any plans yet ?
Not yet.
btw: Does OpenSSL support IPv6 ?
--
francois.pie...@overbyte.be
Author of ICS (Internet Component Suite, freeware)
Author of MidWare (Multi-tier framework, freeware)
http://www.overbyte.be
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto
86 matches
Mail list logo
