My question is this: does Universe handle the random searching of
dynamic arrays (such as VAR1 = VAR2x) better than Unidata?
Apologies if this has already been answered - I deleted a batch of U2 list
emails.
My own researches some time ago suggest that Unidata does not have the
field hints
Martin,
Sounds like something for Better Better to look at...
Martin Phillips wrote:
My question is this: does Universe handle the random searching of
dynamic arrays (such as VAR1 = VAR2x) better than Unidata?
Apologies if this has already been answered - I deleted a batch of U2
list
Mats Carlid wrote:
Thanks for the comments, all. I think Mats and Martin's comments were
kind of what I was expecting, based on what I could remember (been quite
a while since I've paid attention to that kind of stuff!) Dan, thanks
for the shared memory suggestion; we'll definately take a
Hmm... when I see array handling problems in unidata, I start thinking that
maybe shared memory is underconfigured. Do an ipcs -m, grep for sbcs, and if
there is more than one, you need to tune shared memory.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Goo'day,
At 18:44 27/02/07 -0500, you wrote:
Hello, all.
We are in the process of moving to a new ERP solution which runs on
Unidata. Our legacy system runs on Universe. In running some processes
on each system, we are seeing some performance differences; in particular,
running programs
We have taken to using work files on Unidata rather than dynamic arrays.
Whatever you are doing the locate on to build the array becomes the key to the
work file. We cut processing time on some of our large programs from days to
hours switching from dynamic arrays to well sized work files.
Teri,
I'd bet, as cumbersome as it may be, if you pin down the times at which
this error is occurring and can see what other processes are running on
the system at that time you'd probably get a good answer to your
question. However, to prevent this, would it be possible to check and
trap the
We have been using UniVerse 10.1 for at least one year.
--Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bryan Evans
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2006 1:07 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] UniVerse 10.2
On the IBM site, it does not
Bryan
Slightly off topic, but ...
We determined that it was supported on 11.11. We obtained an install CD
and tried to install it. The UV part seemed to work fine, but UVNET does
not talk to 10.0.19. Nor could we get it to talk the other way. We never
tested 10.2 to 10.2.
Trevor
From IBM
http://the.earth.li/~sgtatham/putty/latest/x86/putty.exe
This is the method we use for SSH on PCs. Of course, our Linux
workstations come with it built in.
Karl
quote who=Mike Pflugfelder
Universe 10.1.0, Windows 2000 Server
Does anyone have experience with making a secure telnet connection
Karl,
Are you connecting to a Windows application server or a
Linux/Unix application server?
Thanks,
-Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 1:37 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] Universe
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 1:37 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] Universe Secure Telnet
http://the.earth.li/~sgtatham/putty/latest/x86/putty.exe
This is the method we use for SSH on PCs. Of course, our Linux
Mike
Dynamic Connect, wIntegrate and SBClient support this - otherwise you would
need to adopt one of:
1. use a separate 3rd party product with SSL support.
Or
2. Change the source code of the emulation package of choice to use OpenSSL
(or equivalent) and recompile the emulator source (ask the
It can be done - I once imported a huge corrupted file for investigation and
was able to resize it.
Francis
- Original Message -
From: Brian Leach [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 3:38 AM
Subject: Re: [U2] UniVerse Personal Edition
: [U2] UniVerse Personal Edition
I am trying to use Personal Edition as an emergency backup mode.
Are there any restrictions on say, the VOC file size?
Suggestions would be appreciated.
--Bill
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http
@listserver.u2ug.orgu2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] UniVerse Personal Edition
My version 10.0.4 has maximum modulo 10,007
Francis
- Original Message -
From: jpb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Sent: Wednesday, December
Hi,
You also need to remember that IBM probably monitor this list and use of the
PE in this way is almost certainly a breach of the licence conditions. Keep
the doors locked!!!
Martin Phillips
Ladybridge Systems Ltd
17b Coldstream Lane, Hardingstone, Northampton, NN4 6DB
+44-(0)1604-709200
Uh oh. I sense a slap-on-the-wrist coming.
--
Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ray Methvin
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 11:00 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] UniVerse Personal Edition
Am I understanding
1. License agreements on defunct software are... moot.
2. I had already talked to IBM about splitting our seats among machines for
emergency backup.
We are still weighing alternatives.
3. If Personal Edition is unable to run a big database, then PE is
worthless.
--Bill
---
u2-users
- Original Message -
From: Brutzman, Bill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 3:27 PM
Subject: RE: [U2] UniVerse Personal Edition - Licensing
1. License agreements on defunct software are... moot.
2. I had already talked to IBM about
IBM Business Partner
- Original Message -
From: Brutzman, Bill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 1:27 PM
Subject: RE: [U2] UniVerse Personal Edition - Licensing
1. License agreements on defunct software are... moot.
2. I had already
I am trying to use Personal Edition as an emergency backup mode.
Are there any restrictions on say, the VOC file size?
Suggestions would be appreciated.
--Bill
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
, Bill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 5:19 PM
Subject: RE: [U2] UniVerse Personal Edition
I am trying to use Personal Edition as an emergency backup mode.
Are there any restrictions on say, the VOC file size?
Suggestions would be appreciated
My version 10.0.4 has maximum modulo 10,007
Francis
- Original Message -
From: jpb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 9:51 AM
Subject: Re: [U2] UniVerse Personal Edition
Yes I think there is a modulo limit of 1000.
Jerry
And can
time emergency, though shoulder shrug
BobW
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of jpb
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 3:51 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] UniVerse Personal Edition
Yes I think there is a modulo limit
Doug,
You didn't state whether this is a hashed file or a file produced from
some other OS level application which would make some difference, but
there are a number of ways to do this in UniVerse.
If the file you are interested in is a UniVerse hashed file you can try
and open it with the
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Allen Bell
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 8:30 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] Universe Equivalent of the UnIData DIR command
Doug,
You didn't state whether this is a hashed file or a file produced from
some
On windows do dos dir on *nix do sh ls -ailor similar.
Rgds
Symeon.
On 07/11/06, Gordon J Glorfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Doug,
I'm afraid you're out of luck with this one. You'll have to write your
own platform aware replacement. Yet another shortcoming of UniVerse as
compared
Or
.
.
.
LIST UFD
.
.
.
Les Sherlock Hewkin
Senior Developer
Core Systems - 9951
01604 592289
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Symeon Breen
Sent: 08 November 2006 09:45
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] Universe
Universe has a STATUS statement (not the function) and a FILEINFO()
function. I think the STATUS statement will return most of what you are
looking for.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Doug Farmer
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 4:12
Doug,
I'm afraid you're out of luck with this one. You'll have to write your
own platform aware replacement. Yet another shortcoming of UniVerse as
compared to UniData.
Sorry,
Gordon
Gordon J. Glorfield
Sr. Applications Developer
UnitedHealthcare's Mid-Atlantic Health Plans
301-360-8839
I'm not familiar with the Intermec CK30 terminal, but what it sounds like is
that this terminal has its own input buffer that it feeds to the server. If
this is the case then your INPUTCLEAR is clearing the Servers Input Buffer
but the Intermec is still feeding it data.
You could go into a loop
Try:
F
G:\IBM\UV\VOC
G:\IBM\UV\D_VOC
- Original Message -
From: Louis Windsor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Sent: Saturday, September 02, 2006 3:38 PM
Subject: [U2] UniVerse Personal Editions - Help Please
I have UniVerse running on XP Prof (at home).
I have
Hi Louis
I have updated my UniVerse as suggested and I copied the C:\IBM
directory to G: drive before (thank goodness!)
Obviously I have lost my old VOC so I want to copy stuff back from
the backup copy.
Help
If I understand what you have done correctly. If you originally installed
Universe
Worked perfectly.
Thanks.
I thought I had tried all combinations of \, / and : but
obviously I hadn't.
Thanks again.
Louis
- Original Message -
From: Francis Bennett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Sent: Saturday, September 02, 2006 4:21 PM
Subject: Re: [U2
@listserver.u2ug.org
Sent: Saturday, September 02, 2006 4:38 PM
Subject: RE: [U2] UniVerse Personal Editions - Help Please
Hi Louis
I have updated my UniVerse as suggested and I copied the C:\IBM
directory to G: drive before (thank goodness!)
Obviously I have lost my old VOC so I want to copy stuff back
You left the colon for the drive letter out.
F
G/IBM/UV/VOC
D_VOC
should have been
F
G:/IBM/UV/VOC
D_VOC
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
JPB,
Yes and no. This is our second issue, so 'no' it isn't new, but it
has been a long time and this issue has all new content, so 'yes'.
- Chuck Both Sides of the Issue Barouch
jpb wrote:
What U2UG newsletter? Is this something new?
- Original Message - From: David Jordan
Are you anticipating a version of the U2 Web DE 4.3 to be available with the
PE versions of UV anytime in the future?
Thanks
Tom Dodds
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
513-563-2800 Cincinnati Office
708-234-9608 Chicago Office
630-235-2975 Anywhere Cell
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What U2UG newsletter? Is this something new?
- Original Message -
From: David Jordan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 8:51 PM
Subject: RE: [U2] UniVerse Personal Editions
The next U2UG newsletter, (available soon) will have articles
cc
Subject
Re: [U2] UniVerse Personal Editions
My bad, I found the problem. Was using an old link to the program.
- Original Message -
From: jpb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: u2-users
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Leroy Dreyfuss
Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 8:05 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] UniVerse Personal Editions
All,
Only the two 10.1 servers were updated. There is no need to
download
the clients again until they are replaced
happened, any idea when?
Brenda
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Leroy
Dreyfuss
Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 8:05 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] UniVerse Personal Editions
All,
Only the two
Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 11:55 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] UniVerse Personal Editions
It says right in this email below:
- Original Message -
From: Leroy Dreyfuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 29
I also tried the new UniAdmin and now It won't connect to my servers. One is
the PC I am on, another is our Linux server, and the last is our Solaris
test system. None will connect. What's up?
Jerry
- Original Message -
From: Leroy Dreyfuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
My bad, I found the problem. Was using an old link to the program.
- Original Message -
From: jpb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 3:13 PM
Subject: Re: [U2] UniVerse Personal Editions
I also tried the new UniAdmin and now It won't
to be.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of HENDERSON MIKE,
MR
Sent: Sunday, August 27, 2006 6:24 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [U2] Universe Logins {Unclassified}
John,
I am having the exact same
Hi all,
Does anyone know:
When is 10.2 due out?
What is going to be included? for example Web Service provider.
Regards
Phil.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Leroy Dreyfuss
Sent: Wednesday, 30 August 2006 11:01 a.m.
To:
@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] UniVerse Personal Editions
Hi all,
Does anyone know:
When is 10.2 due out?
What is going to be included? for example Web Service provider.
Regards
Phil.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http
The next U2UG newsletter, (available soon) will have articles about release
10.2
Regards
David Jordan
Hi all,
Does anyone know:
When is 10.2 due out?
What is going to be included? for example Web Service provider.
Regards
Phil.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To
I went to pull a fresh copy -- and the name on the web site is the same as
the last download I did for PE.
As a *suggestion* -- is there any way the ZIP name could contain something
that would be 'unique' like the Expiration date? (I didn't even know there
WAS an expiration date, so I'm glad
DDI: +64 4 2371 828
Fax: +64 4 2371 807
Mob: +64 21 300 654
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Haas, John
Sent: Friday, 25 August 2006 05:37
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Universe Logins
Nope. The name in UV.LOGINS and AD match
Hi John
Check the case (upper/lower/mixed) of the user's name in Active Directory -
If the case there doesn't not match the case in UV.LOGINS, you get this
problem.
For example: In Active Directory username = ArnoldB. In UV.LOGINS,
username = arnoldb causes this.
I learnt this the hard way
Nope. The name in UV.LOGINS and AD match.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Arnold Bosch
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 12:25 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] Universe Logins
Hi John
Check the case (upper/lower/mixed
to provide you
with professional help.
Good luck!
Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Brooks
Sent: Saturday, 12 August 2006 02:02
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Universe ODBC driver performance issues
Make sure the two machines can swap data at network speed with
something as simple as a file copy. If that goes fast(er) then you
know it's something within the database systems, if it's the same then
you have a network issue that needs to be figured out. I've found in
the past that making sure
Chris are you pulling data into SQL Server from UniVerse through an ODBC
connection or are you pushing the data to the SQL Server through BCI.
Regards
David Jordan
Managing Consultant
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chris is transferring on average about 360 (2.6M / 2 / 3600)
records per
second. If the
Of HENDERSON MIKE,
MR
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 6:22 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Universe ODBC driver performance issues {Unclassified}
John,
Chris is transferring on average about 360 (2.6M / 2 / 3600) records per
second. If the records are ~200 chars, then he's
John,
It is abysmal because the NIC and the Ethernet are both gigabit.
Thanks,
Chris
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Hester
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 7:19 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Universe ODBC
David
We are pulling data into SQL Server from UniVerse through an ODBC
connection.
Thanks
Chris
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Jordan
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 4:44 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2
@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Universe ODBC driver performance issues {Unclassified}
Chris are you pulling data into SQL Server from UniVerse through an ODBC
connection or are you pushing the data to the SQL Server through BCI.
Regards
David Jordan
Managing Consultant
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chris
Hi Chris
Why don't you try pushing the data to SQL server using UvBasis and BCI, this
may overcome some of the inefficiencies of ODBC
Regards
David Jordan
Managing Consultant
David
We are pulling data into SQL Server from UniVerse through an ODBC
connection.
Thanks
Chris
---
u2-users
If it's speed you want, go with a text file dump of the data and then
an SQL bulk insert job. I did much the same thing (though with fewer
records) and improved performance dramatically. Sometimes the good
old tools really are better.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Brooks
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 8:21 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] Universe ODBC driver performance issues
I am new to the group and to UniVerse. We are
data
isn't nearly as simple as it looks. This can cause an unexpectedly
large amount of I/O on the UV side.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Hester
Sent: Friday, 11 August 2006 08:39
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Universe ODBC driver
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
HENDERSON MIKE, MR
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 4:22 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Universe ODBC driver performance issues
{Unclassified}
John,
Chris
I have to get even trickier in SB+ -- which will not
officially run in
Prime and Reality flavored accounts. I can't get to
their source code to
control the verb, so I continuously swap-out the
verb in before-and-after
routines. And of course I avoid using SB+ for
selections when I can.
request.) :)
Susan
--
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 10:52:28 +0100
From: Brian Leach [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [U2] Universe/NT Rel. 10.0.10: How to run a program written and
compiled in one flavor in another flavor?
Dave
|
|
| --
|
| Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 10:52:28 +0100
| From: Brian Leach [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: RE: [U2] Universe/NT Rel. 10.0.10: How to run a program written
| and
| compiled in one flavor in another flavor?
|
| Dave
|
| The program flavor and $OPTIONS statement dictate the way the program is
| compiled
Ok, since this is at least the 2nd time this has been brought up, can
some give some examples
of standard unix utilities that do not support files 2GB ?
Hasn't Linux had 2GB file support for, like 10 years?
Hasn't Windows had 2GB file support since W2K (assuming you are not
using FAT16
, 2006 6:13 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Universe file size limits {Unclassified}
Eugene
UniVerse files can go over 2GB if they are created / resized as
64-bit.
I have done this on UV 10.0 on Win2K3, it works!
You can also use UniVerse distributed files to partition your
For those on AIX, 2gig and higher file sizes are definitely possible
with UV using the
same approach already mentioned, but watch out for one AIX gotcha...
The default max
file size on AIX is set to 1gig less 512 bytes on initial O/S install
(or at least it
was as of v5.1 - maybe IBM has
[snip]
As someone else pointed out, watch out for the standard Unix utilities
that do not support files 2G.
Ok, since this is at least the 2nd time this has been brought up, can
some give some examples of standard unix utilities that do not support
files 2GB ? Hasn't Linux had 2GB file
Dave
The program flavor and $OPTIONS statement dictate the way the program is
compiled: determining the specific object code generated. Which means that
the BASIC code itself will run the same, regardless of the flavor of the
account in which is runs. What won't work the same, of course, are
! (as suggested by IBM tech support).
/Scott Ballinger
Pareto Corporation
Edmonds WA USA
206 713 6006
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of HENDERSON MIKE,
MR
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 4:13 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Universe
Eugene,
Was a OS limit, I have a customers with files of 10GB en HPUX
Regards
-Mensaje original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre de Eugene Perry
Enviado el: Miircoles, 05 de Julio de 2006 05:10 p.m.
Para: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Asunto: [U2] Universe file
Eugene
UniVerse files can go over 2GB if they are created / resized as
64-bit.
I have done this on UV 10.0 on Win2K3, it works!
You can also use UniVerse distributed files to partition your data so
that a set of less-than-2GB files appear as a single logical entity.
This is the approach we took
Yeahbut . . . some unix ( linux?) utilities do not work well with the
2GB files.
I recall trouble using some file moving utilities. Some of these
worked, and some didn't: ftp, rcp, cp, tar, cpio ... I don't remember
which. A couple commercial backup utilities failed, too.
That was 4 years ago.
Might be worth taking a stroll through the archives; Glenn Herbert wrote on the
mechanisms used when files are reshaping themselves (which might include
extending into overflow, creating an oversized record, or dynamic file
split/merge activity. Each of these takes a latch on the file header
It was my understanding that 10.2 was the next scheduled release... some time
3rd quarter of this year.
Mark Hennessey
snip
Does anyone know when this {UniVerse 11} is scheduled for release ?
/snip
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit
in August if it is released or not.
Brenda Price
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hennessey, Mark
F.
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 9:07 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Universe 11
It was my understanding that 10.2
Also, the instructor was calling it 11 not 10.2.
Brenda
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hennessey, Mark
F.
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 9:07 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Universe 11
It was my understanding
Rodrigo,
The current highest available version is 10.1.18, but there are a number
of lower versions that are also compatible with Win2003 and still
available as well.
The easiest way to find this information at any time is to use the
Product Availability matrix provided thru the U2TechConnect
Rodrigo:
I just went through some pain when I moved to Win:2003 so I wanted to
share my experience.
We originally installed UV 10 on the new 2003 machine. Everything
appeared to function perfectly except one thing... The break key was
unable to be assigned and would not 'stick'. This was a
Rodrigo,
You can install the latest version. As far as I know this version is
compiled on a 64 bit machine, but is NOT 64 bit written. This came from an
instructor in Denver. Hope this helps.
Cheers,
Angelo Collazo
System Administrator
Silver Line Building Products Corporation
One Silver Line
I dont know if it's relevant to 2003 but there was a special ts_service that was
required for the break key to work with w2k
sure hope I remembered this correctly we initially went thru this in early 2002
Rich
Ray Buchner wrote:
Rodrigo:
I just went through some pain when I moved to
See http://www.pickwiki.com/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?Date_Conversion_With_ICONV for a
discussion of how ICONV deals with wholly numeric external dates.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Sounds like you have hit the problem where, depending on the UDT.OPTIONS
82 value, the system will evaluate to external format first. If you
change the UDT.OPTIONS 82 value then you should find it will work.
The manual states that this should only happen with dates starting 10,
11 or 12... But
It's simply because 14001 through 14365 will resolve in the D2
conversion. That is a bad programming practice to use a DICT item with
D2 and force internal format data for the compare. Just to be clear,
this is not a problem with the system as all, this is just someone using
the system
Hmm
14001 through 14365 are a valid julian dates (14001 = 1 Jan 2014)
So it is reading these as external dates in your selection. 14000 is not a
valid julian date, so it is reading it as internal.
Just why are you trying to force selection using an internal date when you
have a date conversion?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We just ran into a strange issue where LIST/SELECT cannot resolve an
internal date - and it's for a block of one full year.
SNIP
SELECT TESTFILE WITH DATE 14366
Bad data 14366 for conversion D2/. Unconverted data used for
selection.
SNIP
I can't replicate your
Snyder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 June 2006 16:03
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] UniVerse Internal Date Blackout
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/09/2006 10:16:08 AM:
SELECT TESTFILE WITH DATE 14000
Bad data 14000 for conversion D2/. Unconverted data used
Subject
Re: [U2] UniVerse Internal Date
06/09/2006 11:02 Blackout
AM
] cc
stserver.u2ug.org
Subject
RE: [U2] UniVerse Internal Date
06/09/2006 11:00 Blackout
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/09/2006 11:40:36 AM:
Pointing out the obvious was very helpful, thanks. Gives me great
confidence in dealing with IBM on odd issues such as this.
We're dealing with report code written by a vendor (who knows what
bizarre
reason they had), and found the issue
@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] UniVerse Internal Date Blackout
Pointing out the obvious was very helpful, thanks. Gives me great
confidence in dealing with IBM on odd issues such as this.
We're dealing with report code written by a vendor (who knows what
bizarre
reason they had), and found the issue when
u2logic is ok, but it doesn't color syntax:(
and you have to have uv.account for user, so it's useless if you have
one uv.account, for example in Globus implementation.
Maybe something else is avaiable?
2006/5/30, D Averch [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
If you are using Eclipse you can get a free plug-in
, 2006 11:13 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] Universe Jav
u2logic is ok, but it doesn't color syntax:(
and you have to have uv.account for user, so it's useless if you have
one uv.account, for example in Globus implementation.
Maybe something else is avaiable?
2006/5/30, D
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of D Averch
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 10:42 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Universe Java
If you are using Eclipse you can get a free plug-in Editor for Universe
and Unidata from our web site
AM:
This answer helps a lot. Thanks.
--Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Adrian Merrall
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 6:10 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] Universe Java Web Client
Bill,
Did one trial app using
901 - 1000 of 1519 matches
Mail list logo
