Seems to me a system where
*email (the list) carries on as usual
*All emailed responses are submitted as forum responses
*All forum responses are whooshed out to the list as email
I would whole-heartedly agree with this. BUT I have never seen such an
animal in action myself. I
Two ideas, not entirely original:
1) The techie in me says
It would be an interesting project to create the e-mail and web interfaces
described in an MV system. (What a concept, a database for massive amounts
of structured data...) It wouldn't have the bells and whistles of
established e-mail
hard coded maximum
type 19 files are based on machine limits
Chris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
UniVerse: 10.0.10
Windows: 2000 Server
We've encountered a problem such that when writing records to a Type 1
file, with a Record Id length greater than 41 characters, the Record Id is
truncated to the
Anyone know if there's been talk about a callFTP function? That would be
nice to have.
Currently we're executing unix commands to ftp files around. But parsing the
output to determine whether or not the transfer was successful seems a bit
hap-hazard to me.
If anyone would care to share their ftp
No probes on our Universe 9
i.e
:ED BP 12345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890
New record.
: FILE
12345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890 filed in file BP.
:.X
01 ED BP 12345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890
0 lines long.
Which I realise is not actually a
John,
Type 1 is only there for backward compatibility. Type 19 does the
same job but has fewer complications.
--
Sincerely,
Charles Barouch
www.KeyAlly.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We've encountered a problem such that when writing records
create a new type 19
copy in the type 1
delete the type 1
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Claus Derlien
Sent: 23 April 2004 13:13
To: 'U2 Users Discussion List'
Subject: RE: [UV] Max RecId Length with Type1 files
How do you change a type1
I think I have found the holy grail!
Mr Hogan, Sir
I do believe you have it...
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Mark,
We are running on Windows and use ftp primarily for transferring files and
records between branch or laptop systems and main office systems. We
transfer type 18 files and records from type 19 files.
Because we never truly loose the data, it is always still on the sending
system, we don't
Reddy - please respond to the List (not directory to me).
The Wizard will walk you through most of the Steps, the only fields you
need to set are;
Run: - Enter something like; D:\uv\bin\uvsh.exe PHANTOM RUN BP
PROGRAMNAME
Start In: - Directory Path of UV Account
Run as: - User Name Password
Hi,
Can some one tell me how to schedule the pick basic programs.
tx in advance for the help
regards,
Reddy
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Are you on Unix ?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 23 April 2004 13:38
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: How to schedule Pick basic programs
Hi,
Can some one tell me how to schedule the pick basic programs.
tx in
We use Kermit scripts to allow error trapping of ftp processes. Can't
say it's 100% foolproof, but it's a big improvement. For example:
#!/bin/kermit +
set transfer display crt
if \v(argc) 2 exit 1 Usage: \%0 file
ftp open dest_computer /user:usernm /password:passwd
if fail exit 1
windows 2000
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Branching from your idea:
Funny thing, last week two of us were discussing what a terrible job our
company's spam/virus filter was doing, and concluded it's exactly the
kind of thing MV does best, if only there was a true email interface.
On top of that, many of us have had to make hacks to
Create a .bat file that contains UDT PROGAM.TO.RUN
Use the scheduler on Win2k to call the *.bat file.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 23, 2004 8:49 AM
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: RE: How to schedule Pick basic
Another method would be:
ED VOC SCHEDULE-THIS
0001: PA
0001: LOOP (If you want this to repeat each day)
0002: SLEEP XX:XX (Time you want process to run)
0003: TCL COMMAND
0004: TCL COMMAND
0005: TCL COMMAND
0005: REPEAT (If you want this to repeat each day)
PHANTOM SCHEDULE-THIS
LO
It works
At what point in the life of application software would it be so large that
you could not (or would not want to) support it with your existing UniData
or UniVerse database?
Is there a point where you would be better served by DB2 or Oracle, for
example due to the scale you are working with?
I
Across 3 systems, 7,500(ish) on-line Users, have benchmarked to 20,000+
Users. Spooler struggles and we have re-written parts of it.
-Original Message-
From: Dawn M. Wolthuis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 23 April 2004 14:50
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: How far can U2 scale?
At
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dawn M. Wolthuis
At what point in the life of application software would it be
so large that you could not (or would not want to) support it
with your existing UniData or UniVerse database?
Is
Dawn,
Looking at this from outside, I would suggest that session persistence
creates the overheads, so if you are running a traditional application that
needs to maintain a single session per user (e.g a green screen or UniOjects
application) you are probably limited to several thousand users on
Are you looking to print barcodes as a component of another document, or
independent documents such as shipping labels, warehouse tags, and the like?
Is this something you're looking for dedicated barcode printers to service,
or attempting to leverage your existing HP gear?
--Kevin
[EMAIL
I would whole-heartedly agree with this. BUT I have never
seen such an
animal in action myself. I think it's mythical.
Will
It is not mythical, one of the forums I use works exactly like that.
You do have to be set up as a user and subscribe to the forums you
want to read. But after
If you are just looking to print from One particular printer, there
are also external devices you can hook inline to the printer and the
cable, which will take ASCII codes and translate them to the appropriate
HP codes to produce the bar code.
the 128 barcode from Pick, (David Church's) should be
We will be using our existing HP team printers to generate the barcodes.
Greg Bonebrake with PPI in St Louis sent me some code to generate 128
barcodes that works great.
Thanks again Greg for your quick response.
Lee J Messenger
Sr VP Operations
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
DLT Transportation Services,
In my 15 years of printing/using bar codes, I've concluded that it's best to
not re-invent the wheel and purchase printers that are bar code capable.
Thus, you don't really make up the bar code lines themselves, you just send
an escape sequence telling the printer what kind of code, orientation,
This is so simple. Wish we would have discovered it 4 years ago. We've
been doing it the hard way (batch/script file in Scheduler/cron in
Windoze/AIX) up to now. Why didn't UV Support ever tell us about this?
:-(
Thanks George!
Now, if you still want to use the batch file approach you may
In a message dated 4/23/2004 4:16:59 AM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
So will the U2 user group, like to look at this solution? This would give us
both a web and mail list presence and would make ALL of us happy. It will
also show that this community is happy to embrace new
I like the scheduled approach (NT). A phantom in UniVerse like is shown
below with the LOOP/REPEAT gets lost when the server is restarted. So
you need to have a procedure that restarts the job. If you use the NT
scheduler, it is always going to run -- even after a restart.
Dick Kryka
Director
Will,
I'm always happy to nominate someone else to do work. :)
I second Will's motion.
- Charles Where There's a Will... Barouch
-- Original Message -
Subject: Re: We need a web based Forum!
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 12:46:44 -0400
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
Interesting subject!
I think I'm in Brian's camp on this one -- scalability is most dependent on
application system and its architecture -- of which the database system is a critical
component.
I'm wondering where n-tier applications fit into this discussion. I don't think it's
a stretch to
Actually, this method has been in the documentation for at least 10
years. Though you'd think it would be documented in the UniVerse User
Reference manual under 'uv', it's actually found under UV.LOGIN. Go
figure. At least it still appears in the rev10 documentation in the same
place.
At
what I do for that is I have a script I run when either of UV admins
logs in which checks the status of any phantoms that are supposed to
be running on a daily basis, and if not, reports that they are not running.
which is much easier in *NIX (with the ps command). I don't know what
you would use
In a message dated 4/23/2004 11:32:32 AM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
I would whole-heartedly agree with this. BUT I have never
seen such an
animal in action myself. I think it's mythical.
Will
It is not mythical, one of the forums I use works exactly
like
So, I am doing a kind of odd ball thing. I wrote some UV Basic programs to
create batch files that are run via the scheduled tasks. I don't want
Universe running on my machine all the time. So, I created a couple of
'.bat' files to start and stop universe, which are also set up as scheduled
this is proper sequence of shutting UV off
net stop uvtelnet
net stop universe
net stop hsrexec
net stop unirpc
this is proper sequence of starting UV up
net start universe
net start uvtelnet
net start unirpc
net start hsrexec
Sergey Eremenko
-Original
I use the same technique for starting D3, mvBASE, IIS, and other services
form desktop shortcuts. Stopping services with a kill um all, let God sort
um out macro like this can be problematic, it really depends on the
service, but it's a nice way to free resources. You may see the command
window
Tony,
Willing to share any of those scripts? Also, does anyone have a UinData version of
these start/shutdown scripts?
- Charles Scripted Barouch
From: Tony Gravagno [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I use the same technique for starting D3, mvBASE, IIS, and other services form
desktop shortcuts.
OK I just did it your way and I got the same results.
I did a startuv, logged in via telnet, did a stopuv - telnet session is
still alive and well. The book says you can use 'net' commands via the
actual program or by using the 'description'. They should both do the same
thing no ?
Anthony
OK. I've done some testing. It appears that your telnet connection to
localhost UV will stay alive until you will leave that connection. Even if
universe itself stopped, you still able to run simple commands like LISTU,
LISTF, so on. I think that if you want to perform smooth clean and
no-troubles
Tony,
Willing to share any of those scripts? Also, does anyone
have a UinData version of these start/shutdown scripts?
- Charles Scripted Barouch
It's not rocket science, but here are some examples. Just create the
scripts in a standard directory, then drag shortcuts to your desktop,
That's the problem. Telnet isn't being kicked out. I am doing this
(start/stop) from the command line already. No big deal though. I just
thought it was kind of odd. We run the 'real' system on unix and linux
where I don't have such troubles.
Anthony
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
(I'm talking about UV / NT tandem - I'm not Unix guru)
Unfortunately, stopping of UV telnet service will not log users out; it will
just prevent future logons via telnet.
Untill tl_server.exe process (corresponded to your connection to local UV)
is not terminating by something, it will stay here
Design plays a big role. Some banks have massive systems, because all
the customer data is in one spot even though customers are spread over
several cities and states. To me if you live in City A you conduct most
of your transactions in city A and occasionaly on business or holiday
you may do
Dear Friends,
As previously announced, after about nine years of hosting what has
become the u2-users list, I have decided to pass the baton to a new
host. I plan to use the time to pursue some other writing projects.
One of these is to resume writing my column previously published in
There are quite a few sites running upwards of 2000 users in my region (Asia Pacific).
The model is many small users (such as insurance brokers, accountants, tax agents,
etc.) having dial-in access. One site is licensed for 3300 users, and sustains a load
over 3000 users most of the day with
I would imagine in any of the scenarios that has been given, if some form of local
(client side) intelligence is employed, coupled with a non-persistent connection
scheme to the central database, that the numbers that have been quoted here (2-10,000)
could easily be multiplied by a factor of
47 matches
Mail list logo
