Interesting subject!

I think I'm in Brian's camp on this one -- scalability is most dependent on 
application system and its architecture -- of which the database system is a critical 
component.

I'm wondering where n-tier applications fit into this discussion.  I don't think it's 
a stretch to say that the architecture of most MV applications is at best a 2-tier 
design... and the client tier tends to be very thin.  With such a design, it seems 
reasonable to say that for a well designed 2-tier application, the performance 
characteristics and capability of the database system to use available hardware 
resources are significant factors.

What little bit I know about n-tier architecture tells me the database system is a 
scalability factor, but the addition of other components in the application needed to 
coordinate application functionality across the various tiers plays a HUGE role.  Well 
designed applications that can scale by adding systems seems like a powerful notion.  
But, just like the 2-tier application, scalability is still dependent on the 
capability of the overall application design (including its third-party components) 
and its capable to use the available hardware resources.

N-tier seems like scalability Nirvana to me -- though very difficult to achieve.  Are 
there highly scalable n-tier applications using Universe, Unidata, jBASE, etc?

Tom Firl
Columbia Ultimate

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dawn M. Wolthuis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, April 23, 2004 6:50 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: How far can U2 scale?
> 
> 
> At what point in the life of application software would it be 
> so large that
> you could not (or would not want to) support it with your 
> existing UniData
> or UniVerse database?  
> 
> Is there a point where you would be better served by DB2 or 
> Oracle, for
> example due to the scale you are working with?
> 
> I hear people talk about moving way from U2 in order to do 
> ODBC and use
> standard industry tools (and most find that the grass is not 
> greener for
> those purposes), but I don't hear about switching because of 
> running into
> scaling issues.  However, we sometimes think of PICK as addressing
> small-to-mid size businesses and RDBMS folks sometimes think of their
> products as scaling the best.
> 
> So, what's the cut-off for U2?  Thanks.  --dawn
> 
> Dawn M. Wolthuis
> Tincat Group, Inc.
> www.tincat-group.com
> 
> Take and give some delight today.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> u2-users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
> 
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

Reply via email to