As an aside, I do store passwords, but I encrypt them first using a method only
I know about. However I am not using a web portal, so there’s that.
Bob S
On Mar 27, 2024, at 3:44 PM, Tim Selander via use-livecode
wrote:
Dear Alex and Pere
Thank you both for your code and and the time you
Dear Alex and Pere
Thank you both for your code and and the time you took to help!
I'm am working through the code you sent, studying out how it
works. Great learning experience.
Also, Alex, your point of not using password log ins is a
philosophical re-frame in my thinking! Thank you!
Hi Tim,
I guess my first response would be - don't.
Specifically, don't store or use passwords. Users have a bad habit of
re-using the same passwords, so even if your site has no personal or
valuable info about your users, the fact that passwords get re-used
means you are storing valuable
cont ( make mistakes pushing tab on keyboard)
full scrip
"
put "window.location='index.html?_e=Error_sin_login';"
put ""
end if
retrive pass from database
put revOpenDatabase ("mysql",
"localhost:3363","reparacion","gsmmax","11*Endimion_grd") into gDbId
put "select
Hi.
To make online log in is quit easy in livecode.
first you need a webpage with a form asking username, email and password )
and submit to a livecode script
Log in
--- method can be to types get or post - normally I use Get
this will send username
Hi all.
As a hobbiest/amateur I continue to plunk away with Livecode, mostly the
server product in my on-rev account.
Can anyone point me to a tutorial or sample of an online log in system
(username, email and password) for a website using Livecode?
I've found some php tutorials, and
to folks
not using LiveCode Server or RevIgniter - I now realise this should have been
posted on the use RevIgniter list.
I’ve now got a basic button that submits a form data post to the Salesforce
authorisation server. However, there are a couple of issues, which are probably
due to me misreading
Hi Ralf,
Thanks for the guidance and updated formHelper script - and apologies to folks
not using LiveCode Server or RevIgniter - I now realise this should have been
posted on the use RevIgniter list.
I’ve now got a basic button that submits a form data post to the Salesforce
authorisation
experience of using OAuth2 with LiveCode server, to log into
third-party data sources for API access?
I am experimenting with a web based utility app that runs on LiveCode server & RevIgniter and I need to be able to log into a Salesforce.com <http://salesforce.com/> account to pull data in
Hi folks,
Does anyone have experience of using OAuth2 with LiveCode server, to log into
third-party data sources for API access?
I am experimenting with a web based utility app that runs on LiveCode server &
RevIgniter and I need to be able to log into a Salesforce.com
<http://salesfo
Hi Matthias,
To answer your questions:
MacintoshHD/Library/WebServer/CGI-Executables/livecode-server
The hard drive is the internal SSD drive.
Apache server and the livecode server are both installed on the same hard drive.
Scripts are in:
Library/Webserver/Documents
and some are forwarded
I am also running Livecode Server with Apache on 13.4 without a problem so far.
Where did you install the software (Apache/Livecode Server)?
Is Livecode Server installed on the same hard drive as Apache server is
installed?
Where are your scripts stored?
I had once problems with external hard
I am running LiveCode Server version 9.6.9,
with apache 2.4.56 under Mac OS 13.4 Ventura
with a Postgresql database.
All of my energy saver settings in the OS are
set so nothing ever sleeps.
When my server hasn’t been getting incoming
connections for a time, for some stupid reason
it goes
excellent revigniter.com
Alex.
On 11/02/2023 18:05, Paul Richards via use-livecode wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've been using Livecode for a number of years, and have had no issues
whatsoever - but recently thought I would give Livecode server a go.
Using another webserver, I can do something like
Hi everyone,
I've been using Livecode for a number of years, and have had no issues
whatsoever - but recently thought I would give Livecode server a go.
Using another webserver, I can do something like this where you can output true
HTML. This example would check if username/password correct
Is there any way without root access to solve the problem of missing
libraries preventing LiveCode server from running in a shared server
environment? I'm getting this error when running the 9.6.6 64 bit server
from the command line.
./livecode-server-pro: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.17
> Am 22.12.2021 um 21:51 schrieb Mark Wieder via use-livecode
> :
>
> Sorry - my Synology server has an arm processor, and there has never been an
> arm build of the server. Plus now it appears that the server build requires a
> separate license.
>
> I take it you've already been through
On 12/21/21 2:54 PM, matthias rebbe via use-livecode wrote:
Hi,
is there someone on the list who is using Livecode Server on a Synology NAS
with Intel cpu? If so, did you manage to get it working also with the webserver
or only from command line?
Today i installed Livecode Server on my
Hi,
is there someone on the list who is using Livecode Server on a Synology NAS
with Intel cpu? If so, did you manage to get it working also with the webserver
or only from command line?
Today i installed Livecode Server on my Synology NAS with Intel cpu.
I am able to run Livecode scripts from
Of course, right after posting, new ideas come to mind.
Using "put (variable) into URL (server file)" failed, but using
the old
Open file (server file)
write (variable) to file (server file)
close file (server file)
still works fine.
Sorry for the disturbance!
Tim Selander
Tokyo, Japan
Hi,
Several years back, I had a POST web form for our company where I
saved responses to a .csv file on the same server and same folder
as the .lc file. (All hosted on on-rev.com)
That page is long gone, but I now need to do the same thing. But
when I try to write the data to the csv file,
certain inalienable rights… Ahhh. I love cheese.
Bob S
On Jan 24, 2021, at 9:26 AM, Mark Smith via use-livecode
mailto:use-livecode@lists.runrev.com>> wrote:
Thanks for weighing in on this issue Kee. I realize Apple grants unto itself
certain inalienable rights that are not always (in my
Thanks for weighing in on this issue Kee. I realize Apple grants unto itself
certain inalienable rights that are not always (in my opinion) wise, or
justified (ie. they are open to all sorts of corporate bias and malfeasance)
but as you say, “them’s the rules” and if you want to play in their
> On Jan 20, 2021, at 4:20 AM, Mark Smith via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> Thanks Kee, but I am a bit puzzled by the restriction.
>
> That would require complicity from the businesses, which if reputable would
> be a stretch, no?
There is a significantly large number of certified developers.
Andre,
You are probably correct.
Thanks to all of you who have responded to my question about deployment on the
web.
Best,
Bill
William Prothero
http://es.earthednet.org
> On Jan 20, 2021, at 8:22 AM, Andre Garzia wrote:
>
>
> Bill,
>
> :-) that topic is too large for a book to be
Bill,
:-) that topic is too large for a book to be honest.
What I recommend is actually building a desktop standalone. Forget the web
for that app, push for an app.
Best
A
On Wed, 20 Jan 2021 at 16:20, ELS Prothero <
proth...@earthlearningsolutions.org> wrote:
> Thank you, Andre, for you
Thank you, Andre, for you wisdom. What I take from your comments is if I want
to develop dynamic interactive web based apps with Livecode, I should get up to
speed on JavaScript and will need to either use Livecode to generate html5,
compiled with webAssembly, or find another platform to
WebAssembly (aka WASM) is not a silver bullet. It is not something like
"you compile to WebAssembly and then PROFIT".
WebAssembly and ASM.js (which is what the current HTML5 LC Runtime uses)
are very similar. The advantages of WASM is that it is a lot smaller –
since it is bytecode and not
So,
Displaying bundled content only (or mostly) allows Apple's static analysis
tools to take a look at your app. They can also identify outgoing
connections, so they know if you are opening remote pages. If all you do is
display local content, and there is no outgoing connections, then security
> Thanks Kee, but I am a bit puzzled by the restriction.
>
> That would require complicity from the businesses, which if reputable would
> be a stretch, no? For example, if I had an app that linked to course
> selections on University websites, are they going to suggest that these could
> be
Thanks Kee, but I am a bit puzzled by the restriction.
That would require complicity from the businesses, which if reputable would be
a stretch, no? For example, if I had an app that linked to course selections on
University websites, are they going to suggest that these could be portals to
: William Prothero
Subject: Re: Considering work with livecode server
Hmmm…. I see:
"Add WebAssembly build target in HTML5 deployment”, in the"team is working on
right now” category. I guess, given all the delays and getting HTML5 up, I
won’t hold my breath. But, I’ll certainly b
kee nethery wrote:
> On Jan 19, 2021, at 7:58 AM, Mark Smith wrote:
>>
>> Hi Andre, how are “apps to bundled content” different from “apps that
>> are portals to web content" (Jacque’s description)? Or put another
>> way, if someone wanted to design a tourist app that highlighted
>> interesting
William Prothero wrote:
> It would sure be nice if there was some equivalent to shockwave...
For all practical purposes we do:
The Shockwave plugin was an executable engine you could download and
install once, and then play a wide range of scripted interactive media
with it.
A LiveCode
> On Jan 19, 2021, at 7:58 AM, Mark Smith via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> Hi Andre, how are “apps to bundled content” different from “apps that are
> portals to web content" (Jacque’s description)? Or put another way, if
> someone wanted to design a tourist app that highlighted interesting
Hmmm…. I see:
"Add WebAssembly build target in HTML5 deployment”, in the"team is working on
right now” category. I guess, given all the delays and getting HTML5 up, I
won’t hold my breath. But, I’ll certainly be watching for it. Gaads, another
subscription to purchase. But getting real livecode
WebAssembly is on the roadmap.
https://livecode.com/resources/roadmap/
> Op 19 jan. 2021 om 20:43 heeft William Prothero via use-livecode
> het volgende geschreven:
>
> Dan:
> I just did a bit of Googling and wow! It sounds like a capability to compile
> to WebAssembly would put LiveCode
Dan:
I just did a bit of Googling and wow! It sounds like a capability to compile to
WebAssembly would put LiveCode in the big time. I wonder if there is any
interest from the dev team. Sounds much more useful than HTML5.
Best,
Bill
> On Jan 19, 2021, at 11:13 AM, Dan Brown wrote:
>
> When
When livecode supports WebAssembly as a build target you'll be able to do
what you've asked
On Tue, 19 Jan 2021, 20:46 William Prothero via use-livecode, <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> Thanks, all, for your comments. It would sure be nice if there was some
> equivalent to shockwave,
Thanks, all, for your comments. It would sure be nice if there was some
equivalent to shockwave, back in the days. Of course, downloadable plug-ins
like shockwave and flash apparently have too many security issues and are not
allowed anymore.
HTML5 eventually? I assume HTML5 apps would run in
If only!
Bob S
On Jan 19, 2021, at 5:56 AM, Andre Garzia via use-livecode
mailto:use-livecode@lists.runrev.com>> wrote:
A website from 1995
needs to be just as valid to the browser as one from 2021.
___
use-livecode mailing list
Hi Andre, how are “apps to bundled content” different from “apps that are
portals to web content" (Jacque’s description)? Or put another way, if someone
wanted to design a tourist app that highlighted interesting local tourist
destinations near them with a link you can click on to purchase
Andre Garzia wrote:
> But apps that are browsers to bundled content are OK. That is how you
> get Apache Cordova and Phonegap to work.
>
> On Tue, 19 Jan 2021 at 02:06, Mark Wieder wrote:
>>
>>> On 1/18/21 2:20 PM, William Prothero via use-livecode wrote:
>>> Building a single web-based app that
Bill,
Let me second what Richard said, you'd be better served by building desktop
stack apps than by building web apps. There is no silver bullet for doing
web work, there is no magical technology that makes it as easy as LC. The
Web is a design by committee with various multi-billion companies
But apps that are browsers to bundled content are OK. That is how you get
Apache Cordova and Phonegap to work.
On Tue, 19 Jan 2021 at 02:06, Mark Wieder via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> On 1/18/21 2:20 PM, William Prothero via use-livecode wrote:
>
> > Building a single
That's right. Apps that are just portals to web content are forbidden.
--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
On January 18, 2021 8:07:08 PM Mark Wieder via use-livecode
wrote:
On 1/18/21 2:20 PM, William Prothero via
On 1/18/21 2:20 PM, William Prothero via use-livecode wrote:
Building a single web-based app that avoids the world of all the mobile apps
and desktop idiosyncrasies is attractive.
I thought mobile stores (Apple, etc) explicitly disallowed apps that
were essentially just web browsers to
William Prothero wrote:
> Richard,
> I did understand that the server was pretty much like php, but I
> didn’t know how much beyond that it could go in terms of dynamic
> interaction with screen objects.
LC Server does have the ability to export graphics, but being at the far
end of an HTTP
Hi Bill,
If you just want to put together good-looking quick and dirty webpages
that don’t need database interaction, you might want to use Apple’s
Keynote software. You can put together a presentation with links
from one page to another, and just export the whole thing as HTML.
It works really
Richard,
I did understand that the server was pretty much like php, but I didn’t know
how much beyond that it could go in terms of dynamic interaction with screen
objects.
The reason I wanted to look into it’s use in a browser is that for education,
lower level grades use a lot of browser
Bill Prothero wrote:
> I’m considering doing some work with LiveCode server.
...
> Can I position and drag graphic images around. For example, I’m
> thinking of the capability to create an image with various parts
> that I can click to hide and position based on mouse drags
Folks:
I’m considering doing some work with LiveCode server. It looks like revigniter
would be a good startng place, but I have questions before I invest a lot of
time in it.
Can I position and drag graphic images around. For example, I’m thinking of the
capability to create an image
David Bovill wrote:
> The server return 400 Not Found when routing for a *.json file, while
> 200 OK when routing for a *.txt file - all other conditions seem the
> same.
...
> The .htaccess in the $DOCUMENT_ROOT folder does not mention json file
> endings.
Ah, we may have been looking at this
Thanks for the tips Richard:
On 18 Dec 2020, 21:05 +, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode
, wrote:
> David Bovill wrote:
>
> > I have a Livecode server running Revigniter under Apache on Ubuntu. I
> > installed it 8 years ago or so, and it is causing redirect problems
>
David Bovill wrote:
> I have a Livecode server running Revigniter under Apache on Ubuntu. I
> installed it 8 years ago or so, and it is causing redirect problems
> with files ending in .json. I am assuming that a long time ago a set
> the configuration somewhere to handle
I have a Livecode server running Revigniter under Apache on Ubuntu. I installed
it 8 years ago or so, and it is causing redirect problems with files ending in
.json. I am assuming that a long time ago a set the configuration somewhere to
handle .json files in a particular way, but I can’t track
heriberto harrumphed
>3) Today's macOS is descended from NeXT (which Apple acquired and
> transitioned macOS to in 1999)
And they got a free Jobs to go with it!
Or did they buy a Jobs, and get a free OS. I’ve never quite been clear . .
> 6) The Mach microkernel was replaced with the
difficult could it be porting Livecode Server to ARM? I tried to
do this last year using the source code but I got this error: Unknown
platform.
I tried to remove from the source code the target platform check but it
didn't work.
Best,
Hery
On 10/29/20 1:57 PM, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode
Not very sure, but months ago I read this (but he seems to talk about
BSD user utils more than the Kernel).
https://www.quora.com/Is-macOS-considered-to-be-a-BSD-UNIX
Yes, Apple’s macOS can be considered to be a BSD UNIX.
1) Apple’s macOS is an officially certified UNIX, that takes care of
of Livecode
server for Raspberry.
Livecode currently compiles for many ARM versions.
How difficult could it be to adapt Livecode Server to these versions?
On 10/28/20 11:06 PM, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode wrote:
Heriberto Torrado wrote:
> So, here is my idea: What about to create non offic
Brian Milby wrote:
> On Oct 28, 2020, at 11:57 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
>> But Heriberto's up for an adventure, one enhancement that would lower
>> RAM use and speed things up a bit is this one:
>>
>> https://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=14115
>>
>> Heriberto, if that's interesting to
Are we sure about this?? I thought Apple had moved completely away from BSD a
long while back.
Bob S
> On Oct 28, 2020, at 12:53 , Heriberto Torrado via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> Thanks Andre,
>
> I realized that BSD kernels are not the same as MacOS kernels.
> As you say: MacOS has a
Gaskin
Subject: Re: Livecode server UNIX version (not Linux).
What is the workaround that you ended up using? I looked at the code once but
it quickly went over my head. I couldn’t see where the fonts were pulled in,
at least not where it could be cleanly intercepted.
Sent from my iPhone
What is the workaround that you ended up using? I looked at the code once but
it quickly went over my head. I couldn’t see where the fonts were pulled in,
at least not where it could be cleanly intercepted.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 28, 2020, at 11:57 PM, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode
Hey Friends,
I'm enjoying this thread a lot. I'll not be the person to tell someone not
to port LC to some new ISA or OS, I think it would be great if LC would run
in BSD. Personally, I don't have the time or even the skillset to help
this, but I'd love to benefit from it. Incidentally this is
Pi Digital wrote:
> Here’s my take (for what it’s worth). Although Unix is used in 71.6%
> (source: w3techs.com) of all known websites as of today and Linux only
> 29.0%, at least we have ‘a’ distro that works on some server.
That struck me as odd, so I took a moment to see how they derived
Heriberto Torrado wrote:
> So, here is my idea: What about to create non official versions of
> Livecode server (for scripting purposes) for other platforms not yet
> supported?
> I think it could be good for RunRev: They won't have to work
> supporting those versions and Li
ial versions of Livecode
> server (for scripting purposes) for other platforms not yet supported?
> I think it could be good for RunRev: They won't have to work supporting those
> versions and Livecode language will spread to other fields.
>
> What do you guys think? Do you think
Thanks Andre,
I realized that BSD kernels are not the same as MacOS kernels.
As you say: MacOS has a hybrid kernel based on XNU and some parts of BSD.
I'm only interested in running the Livecode server version and not the IDE.
So, I think that compiling could be the best solution.
I have been
thinking about tinkering with a FreeBSD server and LiveCode server,
> > but I didn't see a "UNIX" version, so I suppose that I have to compile
> it.
> > Have any of you installed LiveCode server on FreeBSD (or Solaris)?
> >
>
> As others mentioned, this is dated informatio
>
> OS X, Windows 95 through Windows 10, Raspberry Pi and "several variations
> of Unix (I think is just means Linux)".
>
> I'm thinking about tinkering with a FreeBSD server and LiveCode server,
> but I didn't see a "UNIX" version, so I suppose that I
I have a question. It's not a very important question and I don’t
want
to bother you y 'all, so if you think is off-topic, feel free to not to
respond, I'm just curious.
I've been working with Livecode for almost five years, and I never
saw a
LiveCode server "UNIX" version.
T
nt question and I don’t want
to bother you y 'all, so if you think is off-topic, feel free to not to
respond, I'm just curious.
I've been working with Livecode for almost five years, and I never saw a
LiveCode server "UNIX" version.
The LiveCode Wikipedia’s article says this: LiveCode
Which is why my sentence finishes with "... to be in a situation to take on
this level of complexity." :-)
Apple first bought the domain iphone.org in 1999. That the iPhone was under
development was even being discussed by mainstream media such as the New
York Times in 2002. The public
spond, I'm just curious.
I've been working with Livecode for almost five years, and I never saw a
LiveCode server "UNIX" version.
The LiveCode Wikipedia’s article says this: LiveCode runs on iOS, Android,
OS X, Windows 95 through Windows 10, Raspberry Pi and "several variations
of Un
com> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I have a question. It's not a very important question and I don’t want
> to bother you y 'all, so if you think is off-topic, feel free to not to
> respond, I'm just curious.
>
> I've been working with Livecode for almost five years, and I ne
Dear all,
I have a question. It's not a very important question and I don’t want to
bother you y 'all, so if you think is off-topic, feel free to not to respond,
I'm just curious.
I've been working with Livecode for almost five years, and I never saw a
LiveCode server "UNIX&quo
;>> IT Director
>>> Evergreen Information Services
>>> rdim...@evergreeninfo.net
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: use-livecode [mailto:use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com] On Behalf
>>> Of Keith Clarke via use-livecode
&
Original Message-
From: use-livecode [mailto:use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com] On Behalf
Of Keith Clarke via use-livecode
Sent: Monday, October 12, 2020 3:18 AM
To: use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Cc: Keith Clarke
Subject: LiveCode server IDE
Hi folks,
What is the current state of the art r
-
From: use-livecode [mailto:use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com] On Behalf
Of Keith Clarke via use-livecode
Sent: Monday, October 12, 2020 10:49 AM
To: use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Cc: Keith Clarke
Subject: Re: LiveCode server IDE
Thanks for the response, Ralph.
I've struggled to retain/regain
livecode
> Sent: Monday, October 12, 2020 3:18 AM
> To: use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Cc: Keith Clarke
> Subject: LiveCode server IDE
>
> Hi folks,
> What is the current state of the art regarding LiveCode server IDE -
> searching around, this seems down to personal preferen
12, 2020 3:18 AM
To: use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Cc: Keith Clarke
Subject: LiveCode server IDE
Hi folks,
What is the current state of the art regarding LiveCode server IDE -
searching around, this seems down to personal preference of text editor plus
FTP?
I'm Mac-based and looking to experiment
vices
rdim...@evergreeninfo.net
-Original Message-
From: use-livecode [mailto:use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com] On Behalf
Of Keith Clarke via use-livecode
Sent: Monday, October 12, 2020 3:18 AM
To: use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Cc: Keith Clarke
Subject: LiveCode server IDE
Hi f
Hi folks,
What is the current state of the art regarding LiveCode server IDE - searching
around, this seems down to personal preference of text editor plus FTP?
I'm Mac-based and looking to experiment with web services.
Thanks and regards,
Keith
Sent from my iPad
catch my interest.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Rick
>
> > On May 27, 2020, at 11:44 AM, Håkan Liljegren via use-livecode
> > wrote:
> >
> > Ouch,
> >
> > Hit send to early, new try:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was trying to get LiveCode
> Am 27.05.2020 um 17:44 schrieb Håkan Liljegren via use-livecode
> > :
> >
> > Ouch,
> >
> > Hit send to early, new try:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was trying to get LiveCode server up and running under MAMP in macOS
> > Catalina a
>
> I was trying to get LiveCode server up and running under MAMP in macOS
> Catalina and if anyone is interested. This is what I did to get it running.
>
> 1. Download and unpack LiveCode Server
> 2. Move livecode-server, drivers folder and externals folder into the cgi-bin
>
Did you get MAMP to work with SSL?
If you do, let me know as then you might catch my interest.
Thanks,
Rick
> On May 27, 2020, at 11:44 AM, Håkan Liljegren via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> Ouch,
>
> Hit send to early, new try:
>
> Hi,
>
> I was trying to get
Ouch,
Hit send to early, new try:
Hi,
I was trying to get LiveCode server up and running under MAMP in macOS Catalina
and if anyone is interested. This is what I did to get it running.
1. Download and unpack LiveCode Server
2. Move livecode-server, drivers folder and externals folder
Hi,
I was trying to get LiveCode server up and running under MAMP in macOS Catalina
and if anyone is interested. This is what I did to get it running.
1. Download and unpack LiveCode Server
2. Move livecode-server, drivers folder and externals folder into the cgi-bin
folder in MAMP
Hello, Kieth.
My health problems have kept me from really participating on the list
for a long time but I stayed as I want to get back to using Livecode at
some point. Your question about linux distros for server use on old
hardware though is something I can comment on.
Sorry I did not post
Which distro(s) would you recommend for a Linux newbie as the easiest
>> way to repurpose an old PC, Mac Laptop or Mini to host Livecode Server
>> for lightweight ‘LAMP/LAML' dev/test dabbling?
>> I’ve never had a Linux desktop machine and server-wise, never had to
>> delve
On 5/9/20 6:46 AM, Keith Clarke via use-livecode wrote:
Hi folks,
Which distro(s) would you recommend for a Linux newbie as the easiest way to
repurpose an old PC, Mac Laptop or Mini to host Livecode Server for lightweight
‘LAMP/LAML' dev/test dabbling?
I’ve never had a Linux desktop machine
Keith Clarke via use-livecode:
Hi folks,
Which distro(s) would you recommend for a Linux newbie as the easiest way to
repurpose an old PC, Mac Laptop or Mini to host Livecode Server for lightweight
‘LAMP/LAML' dev/test dabbling?
I’ve never had a Linux desktop machine and server-wise, never had
Keith Clarke wrote:
> Hi folks,
> Which distro(s) would you recommend for a Linux newbie as the easiest
> way to repurpose an old PC, Mac Laptop or Mini to host Livecode Server
> for lightweight ‘LAMP/LAML' dev/test dabbling?
>
> I’ve never had a Linux desktop machine and serv
Hi folks,
Which distro(s) would you recommend for a Linux newbie as the easiest way to
repurpose an old PC, Mac Laptop or Mini to host Livecode Server for lightweight
‘LAMP/LAML' dev/test dabbling?
I’ve never had a Linux desktop machine and server-wise, never had to delve
below C-Panel &
I have a email CGI from a very old cgi for the days when "revolution" was the
server
Now with LiveCode server, Ubuntu 18+ does have
/usr/sbin/sendmail
installed, at least I see that, but this old process does not work
put "/usr/sbin/sendmail -t" into mprocess
open proces
Thanks for the info Todd. This explains why I had
an issue on Mac OS. I once added the directive to .htaccess.
Ralf
> On 19. Oct 2019, at 06:08, Todd Fabacher via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> GOOD NEWS - Got it to work. Someone should take note an issue with
> Apache 2 and
ache 2.conf. the lesson should
>updated as it is no longer valid.
>
>Todd Fabacher via use-livecode schreef
>op 19 oktober 2019 06:08:03 CEST:
>>GOOD NEWS - Got it to work. Someone should take note an issue with
>>Apache 2 and LiveCode server
>>
>>SetEnvIf
ake note an issue with
>Apache 2 and LiveCode server
>
>SetEnvIf Authorization "(.*)" HTTP_AUTHORIZATION=$1
>
>For Linux in /etc/apache2/apache2.conf
>
>For Mac (using Homebrew) in /usr/local/etc/httpd/httpd.conf
>
>Adding this to .htaccess didn't work for
1 - 100 of 581 matches
Mail list logo
