I'm in agreement with Ken on this one. As mainly a PC user, it is obvious to
me that RR is marketing mainly at Mac users. This is because ex-HyperCard
users are the 'low hanging fruit' for RR - and a company like RR with
limited resources wants to make the easy sales first.
While Tom's GOOGLING
Below I pasted a piece of a .asp file off the web. I don't know but I
think the !--display quote-- is a tag but am not sure if it is xml or
what.
What I want to do is capture just that part and add some code to it to
better format the page. right now the !--display paragraphs-- run
together
Frank,
If you want dot notation and equals signs, why wouldn't you just use C, or
VB or Java or any ohter authoring language which has those? That's what
*they do*. At some point, adding same syntax ends up creating same
functionality.
The fact is that the X-talks *are not like those other
Below I pasted a piece of a .asp file off the web.
the asp file gets processed on the server and sent to you as plain html
(same as php and cfm)
think the !--display quote-- is a tag but am not sure if it is xml or
simple little comment tags.. nothing more, nothing less
need to know how
I agree with you Chipp.
I turned down a job doing a Director project and instead talked them
into doing it in REV because I KNEW I could get it done quicker and in
the short time frame they needed. Now D does have its points but XTalk
just works better for these type of projects for me. I can
On 2/9/04 4:31 PM, Thomas McGrath III [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With REV I 'think' about what I want in english
like terms and then start typing.
I think that's what started the thread. Not all developers around the world
think in English-like terms. :)
doug
--- Kurt Kaufman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is an example of an application built
entirely for my own needs:
I recently bought a digital camera capable of
creating short video
clips. Unfortunately, many short clips means
many double-clicks on file
icons, or many trips to the File
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2004 23:09:01 -0700
From: Alex Rice [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: mission critical apps; was Re: cross platform ide
Again: formalize it and be able to explain it to managers and other
programmers. Make a case study for runrev to post on their website. Or
write a HOW-To and
Here's the workflow for the new system:
...
2c-ii) If it cannot be reproduced, a comment is added to the
bug to ask the original submitter if they can come
up with another recipe (since we couldn't reproduce
it) and the status
Alex,
You bring up many excellent points...but I really thing you miss some big
ones.
1) Your inability to answer a question about messaging does not make RR
unfit for work in the Enterprise. Not that I'm saying you aren't smart about
these things, I know just the opposite is true, just looking
Hi Thomas,
What you posted below is just plain old HTML which has been generated from
an ASP script on a Microsoft IIS server.
!-- This is an HTML comment --
just like in Rev:
--This is a Rev comment
the .asp at the end of the URL tells the server what type of file the URL
is. In the case of
Alex Rice wrote:
The questions I intended to bring up were:
1) In a technical interview, or when trying to sell an xtalk solution
to corporate IT dept, you may run into someone who challenges the
xtalk/smalltalk messaging model. I described in a previous post that
interview where the Java
Richard Gaskin wrote:
How many times does an IT request get delivered long after it was
useful?
How many in-house apps get deployed but never used because it's hard
to make
great interfaces quickly in most other tools? How many projects are
over
budget?
How many programs have you all written
Frank Leahy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not supporting these standard statements make the language look a bit
beginner-ish.
You are right. talk statements are way too childish!
Speak of real programer language, not a quiche-eater one!
(here, in fact, it is a bottle-eater one ;-)))
Below is an
Kjetil Rå Hauge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Applescript already has French
No more. And it's *good* ;-)
The french version ws plagued with a number of bugs...
It was funny to play Babelfish with it (fr en fr) ;-)))
As a french speaker, I am *not* disturbed by having to write scripts in
a
On Monday, February 9, 2004, at 07:44 AM,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, if they are xml then can I use rev to parse the info
If not then is my best bet to just search/offset the info and write my
own html for use in rev???
It's not xml, it's just HTML. Don't worry about the fact that the
On Monday, February 9, 2004, at 07:44 AM,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank,
If you want dot notation and equals signs, why wouldn't you just use
C, or
VB or Java or any ohter authoring language which has those? That's what
*they do*. At some point, adding same syntax ends up creating same
From: Dan Shafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It is a hazardeous way to compare Flash and Revolution ; but it is
easy to explain Revolution is superior to Flash beacuse Revolution can
embedd Flash.
Reminds me of the old religious language wars between Prolog and LISP.
The LISPers always thought they could
While you all debate the pros and con of win/mac/lin and the rest...
Top 12 Things A Klingon Programmer Would Say
12. Specifications are for the weak and timid!
11. This machine is a piece of GAGH! I need dual Pentium processors if I am to
do battle with this code!
10. You cannot
Le 9 févr. 04, à 08:34, Doug Lerner a écrit :
On 2/9/04 4:31 PM, Thomas McGrath III [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With REV I 'think' about what I want in english
like terms and then start typing.
I think that's what started the thread. Not all developers around the
world
think in English-like
I know that a lot of colleagues would rather not use a Mac tool...
Not that they like Microsoft tool better but what PC, SUN, Unix, Linux
marketing have they seen? They surely dont look at mac stuff...
While the Mac market is important, Im sure they're missing about
90% of the programmer's
On Monday, February 9, 2004, at 10:35 AM,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the argument against the xTalk messaging model?
Richard,
In most any other dev environment, the only messages your app gets
are mouse and keyboard events, and possibly network events/messages --
otherwise you are in
Doug Lerner a *crit :
On 2/9/04 4:31 PM, Thomas McGrath III [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With REV I 'think' about what I want in english
like terms and then start typing.
I think that's what started the thread. Not all developers around the world
think in English-like terms. :)
AFAIR
(BOn Monday, February 9, 2004, at 06:47 AM,
(B[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(B
(B From: UDI [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B Subject: Re: xTalk JPEG parser?
(B To: How to use Revolution [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-2022-JP"
(B
(B Stephen
From: Pierre Sahores [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Agreed ! The English-like syntax of Transcript seem me to be one of the
main parts of the XTalk paradigm : As long as Rev will support this VHLL
feature, we will stay able to code transcript handlers, even without
running computers : i like to feel me
Doug Lerner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that's what started the thread. Not all developers around the world
think in English-like terms. :)
You are wrong. In spite of my sig, when I am scripting I think directly
in pig-english ;-)
In fact, I am almost speaking in my head while typing --
At 8:33 PM +0100 2/7/04, Dom wrote:
About visually impaired persons: it's a pain for me to read those tiny
chars in the Help ;-
This ought to be a choice!
Sorry. It was difficult to design this in, because the way styles in
fields are architected currently, any change to font, size, style,
or
On Feb 7, 2004, at 12:22 PM, Jeanne A. E. DeVoto wrote:
Increasing the delay might work, as a workaround.
Oh god. Is this an engine bug or an IDE bug? Surely go next isn't broken?
cmd-3 etc used to be in a frontscript of IDE (commandkeydown handler
if I recall). I haven't looked at the current
I english orientation language of RunRev love.
Jim
___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
On Saturday, February 7, 2004, at 07:32 PM, Robert Brenstein wrote:
That's right. If my product uses somebody else's library, I
should/could include a mention of it in my About box but otherwise
it should not be (in typical program) explicitely visible to the
end user. However, as someone said
On 9/2/04 2:22 am, Ken Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought Kevin dealt well with that one the other day. If
anyone has a
perception that Rev is a Mac tool, there's not much that can
be done to
help them. The MacWorld (UK?) reviewer who said that obviously had
spent little or no time
On 02/09/2004 at 08:06 AM, Claude [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If Revolution can speak the same langage as JavaScript, Flash (and
tomorrow Director) that can help thousands of programmer to test it and
to
adopt it.
Claude
This brings an idea to mind... If we can do fld 1 as AppleScript, can
Thank you, Xavier. This explains a lot... Microsoft actually comes from the
alpha quadrant.
/H
Top 12 Things A Klingon Programmer Would Say
12.Specifications are for the weak and timid!
11.This machine is a piece of GAGH! I need dual Pentium processors if I
am to
do battle with
Thank you, Xavier. This simly confirms the widespread suspicions that
Microsoft in fact originated in the alpha quadrant.
/H
___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
On 9/2/04 09:23 AM, Kevin Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Without in any way losing our great Mac
support, we're working hard on our presence on other platforms.
Kevin,
Does that include SGI Irix? I still don't see any current Rev software
available for all of the supposedly supported
I like xObject as a name. Sort of an 'xTalk' based upon object models
for RAD.
I only think of stack, card and controls as objects anyway. I don't
even 'get' the metaphor anymore. Of course, I don't 'get' the stage,
players either. I mean deep in my mind when I am planning a new project
I
Thank you, Xavier. This simly confirms the widespread suspicions that
Microsoft in fact originated in the alpha quadrant.
/H
___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
This is Bill of the Borg,
To debug is futile (we sold it already!).
8X
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2004 15:37
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Klingon scripting code revolution
I once heard that AppleScript was localizable into other languages --
French, I think. I even heard that they produced, but never released, a
C dialect of AppleScript to make the serious programmers happy. ;-)
regards,
Geoff Canyon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Feb 8, 2004, at 3:09 PM, Stephen Quinn
Thank you, Xavier. This simly confirms the widespread suspicions that
Microsoft in fact originated in the alpha quadrant.
/H
___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
When I
set the angle of image test to 50
The image rotates correctly but the resulting image has a black
background. I basically want to take one word text fields, convert them
to images , rotate (or in this case set the angle) them and place the
resulting rotated images side by side creating
x = y + z (instead of put y + z into x)
x += 1 (instead of add 1 to x)
x.myProperty = foo (instead of set myProperty of x to foo)
Not supporting these standard statements make the language look a
bit beginner-ish
Gee Frank,
If memory serves, none of these standard statements would pass a
If Revolution can speak the same langage as JavaScript, Flash (and
tomorrow Director) that can help thousands of programmer to test it
and to adopt it.
If JavaScript, Flash, (and tomorrow Director) programmers would learn
Transcript, they might find themselves in possession of new
capabilities
On 2/9/04 7:31 AM, Frank Leahy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I seem to recall a discussion a month or so ago about how to set a
window's size before it opens -- but I can't find it via Google.
All of my windows want to resize themselves smaller when they open, and
so I've taken to resetting the
All of my windows want to resize themselves smaller when they open,
and so I've taken to resetting the height on preOpenStack, and
because that doesn't always work,
Frank,
On Mac platforms at least, there are two things one should NOT do in
preOpenStack: (1.) Reference a stack menu control
Setting the size of your stack in a preOpenStack handler should work fine
(been doing it for years without a problem).
Are you running stacks with menus on Mac OS, Scott?
I find stack height is often wrong unless I adjust it in openStack.
Try opening the Distribution Builder and loading several
Frank Leahy wrote:
In most any other dev environment, the only messages your app gets
are mouse and keyboard events, and possibly network events/messages --
otherwise you are in control of everything else, from what gets drawn
on the screen to what user interaction occurs.
...requiring you
On Feb 9, 2004, at 4:16 AM, Frank Leahy wrote:
Richard wrote:
What is the argument against the xTalk messaging model?
I'll keep repeating it: the argument is you don't know at until runtime
if the message goes where you think it will go. One way to state it is
throwing a message out for some
On Feb 9, 2004, at 12:46 AM, Chipp Walters wrote:
1) Your inability to answer a question about messaging does not make RR
unfit for work in the Enterprise.
I didn't mean to imply that. I said: I mean where $, property, or
safety is actually at stake. ... It's a legitimate question, issue, and
Recently, Rob Cozens wrote:
Setting the size of your stack in a preOpenStack handler should work fine
(been doing it for years without a problem).
Are you running stacks with menus on Mac OS, Scott?
I find stack height is often wrong unless I adjust it in openStack.
Try opening the
On Feb 9, 2004, at 2:11 AM, Ian Wood wrote:
How many programs have you all written quickly in Revolution that
would have taken much too long with another tool/language?
Like I said to Chipp: Don't appeal to programmer productivity. I
already know runrev is the most productive tool for me. That's
Thank you, Xavier. This simly confirms the widespread suspicions that
Microsoft in fact originated in the alpha quadrant.
/H
___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Thank you, Xavier. This simly confirms the widespread suspicions that
Microsoft in fact originated in the alpha quadrant.
/H
___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
2) There are many factors which go into tool selection. Unfortunately for
RR, there are many which would seem to disqualify it before even starting.
Good points
Alex and original poster: Don't give me an Andy Ihnatko
generalities, list these factors.
--
Rob Cozens
CCW, Serendipity Software
Not supporting these standard statements make the language look a
bit beginner-ish
Frank, et al:
Is there something inherently inferior about a programming
environment that can be used productively by someone who doesn't have
a degree in computer science?
Do professional developers feel
On Feb 9, 2004, at 9:00 AM, Rob Cozens wrote:
Alex and original poster: Don't give me an Andy Ihnatko
generalities, list these factors.
http://lists.runrev.com/pipermail/use-revolution/2004-February/
030969.html
--
Alex Rice | Mindlube Software | http://mindlube.com
Apologies for multiple posts... Email system is giving me grief. A lot.
/H
___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Stephen Quinn Barncard wrote:
Why this big negative about using Apple technologies? Quicktime works
well, and is free.
...
All Windoze and Linux users have all benefited from Apple raising
the bar and should admit it.
Where is QuickTime for Linux?
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World Media
Hi all,
On Feb 9, 2004, at 10:24 AM, Stephen Quinn Barncard wrote:
Why this big negative about using Apple technologies? Quicktime works
well, and is free.
Quicktime is not available for Linux.
That's sad but true :-(
But there might be light at the end of the tunnel :-)
This is from
You might want to try seeing if you can create a resizing problem with the
IDE suspended.
Good suggestion, Scott. I will do so.
--
Rob Cozens
CCW, Serendipity Software Company
http://www.oenolog.net/who.htm
And I, which was two fooles, do so grow three;
Who are a little wise, the best fooles bee.
I asked: How are you going to sell xtalks in a corporate
environment where reliability and correctness is _more important
than programmer productivity_ ?
Alex,
You're probably not; so those corporate environments, which never
have never will embrace cutting-edge technology until it is passe
On Feb 9, 2004, at 10:36 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
My question was:
Can you think of a way to address those concerns while retaining
the essential flavor of the language?
How would you like it to work, and have you submitted an enhancement
request
for it?
I have no solutions. It cannot be
Alex and original poster: Don't give me an Andy Ihnatko
generalities, list these factors.
http://lists.runrev.com/pipermail/use-revolution/2004-February/ 030969.html
Thanks, Alex...
Now can you tell me which thread to search; there are a lot of
messages at the URL
--
Rob Cozens
CCW,
On Feb 9, 2004, at 9:48 AM, Rob Cozens wrote:
You are quite welcome to deal with corporate idiots such as these,
Alex, but let's not drag Transcript down to curry favor with
no-nothings.
Sounds like politics to me. I am raising a hypothetical question.
Suppose you were trying to bring xtalk
On Feb 9, 2004, at 9:55 AM, Rob Cozens wrote:
Alex and original poster: Don't give me an Andy Ihnatko
generalities, list these factors.
http://lists.runrev.com/pipermail/use-revolution/2004-February/
030969.html
Thanks, Alex...
Now can you tell me which thread to search; there are a lot of
Le 9 févr. 04, à 18:39, Richard Gaskin a écrit :
Stephen Quinn Barncard wrote:
Why this big negative about using Apple technologies? Quicktime works
well, and is free.
...
All Windoze and Linux users have all benefited from Apple raising
the bar and should admit it.
Where is QuickTime for Linux?
Le 9 févr. 04, à 17:23, Rob Cozens a écrit :
You might want to try seeing if you can create a resizing problem
with the
IDE suspended.
When I have troubles with resizing stack window on Mac OS X, I simply
hide the group menubar
it does appear altough I've hidden the mnnubar and the stack size
Stephen Quinn Barncard wrote:
Why this big negative about using Apple technologies? Quicktime works
well, and is free. All this Applephobia is getting really dumb. Does
Sony think they will sell more videocams because they call Firewire
iLink, even though Apple created it?
The FireWire name is
I can give you a concrete reason why some of my Win only friends are
edgy about having to install quicktime, and it is for the same reason I
am edgy about having to install any product from Real media: there is,
or at least has been in past installers, a tendency for QT to hijack
media
On Feb 9, 2004, at 4:16 AM, Frank Leahy wrote:
Richard wrote:
What is the argument against the xTalk messaging model?
I'll keep repeating it: the argument is you don't know at until runtime
if the message goes where you think it will go. One way to state it is
throwing a message out for
I'm using Rev 2.1.2 under Mac OS X 10.3.2 to build an app. If I run
the app inside the development environment, or as a standalone
Classic app, then it works fine. However, if I run the OS X app
built at the same time, then it fails to locate the support folder
and files in the same folder
I have been looking at the Runtime Revolution XML API it seems similar to expat and
several others I have used. However, I have failed to locate any examples or
tutorials are there any? If so where might I find them?
K
___
Join Excite! -
On Feb 4, 2004, at 2:33 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
I like your comments on ways to improve the RunRev Web site and would
encourage you to forward them to Lorin Rivers at [EMAIL PROTECTED] as
I'm
sure that refining Web site is an ongoing interest.
Lorin Rivers was VP of Marketing for REAL Software
On Feb 9, 2004, at 11:12 AM, tuviah snyder wrote:
Well in some frameworks/languages this is a feature..but it would
greatly
improve engine speed to be able to resolve which object gets the
message and
prepare the parameters at compile time for certain user defined
functions/handlers.enabling Rev
On Monday, February 9, 2004, at 03:34 AM, Frank Leahy wrote:
I think you're confusing the language (xTalk), with the development
and runtime environment (call it HyperCard++ for the moment).
HyperCard++ is a Rapid Application Development environment that uses
the concepts of stacks, cards and
Where might I locate the SDB/libIPC (to edcuate myself)?
K
--- On Mon 02/09, Alex Rice [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Alex Rice [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 11:41:13 -0700
Subject: Re: mission critical apps; was Re: cross platform ide
brOn Feb
On Monday, February 9, 2004, at 06:24 AM, Robert Brenstein wrote:
This will be possible only when text attributes will become truly
inherited. I mean individually inherited. As it is now, they are
object/chunk attributes are now stored in sets (bundles of font name,
size, and style). This
I sense you feel threatened by this thread because SDB and libIPC
are geared towards a more business like, maybe mission-critical
applications?
Sorry if it comes off looking that way, Alex. As IS manager for
several corporate governmental organizations, I did my home work
and provided senior
Christopher Mitchell wrote:
I can give you a concrete reason why some of my Win only friends are
edgy about having to install quicktime, and it is for the same reason I
am edgy about having to install any product from Real media: there is,
or at least has been in past installers, a tendency
On Monday, February 9, 2004, at 11:12 AM, tuviah snyder wrote:
So I'm for any syntax which would enable me to precompile some
functions
(such as math functions, ect) without losing the flexibility in cases
where
I may want to dynamically intercept messages like mousemove in a
backscript.
Where might I locate the SDB/libIPC (to edcuate myself)?
http://www.oenolog.net/ftp/serendipity_downloader.htm
Enjoy!
--
Rob Cozens
CCW, Serendipity Software Company
http://www.oenolog.net/who.htm
And I, which was two fooles, do so grow three;
Who are a little wise, the best fooles bee.
from The
Alex Rice wrote:
On Feb 4, 2004, at 2:33 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
I like your comments on ways to improve the RunRev Web site and would
encourage you to forward them to Lorin Rivers at [EMAIL PROTECTED] as
I'm
sure that refining Web site is an ongoing interest.
Lorin Rivers was VP of
On Feb 9, 2004, at 11:43 AM, Alex Rice wrote:
I know- but for someone who didn't cut their teeth with metacard, and
all they have experienced is the runrev IDE, then it's blind faith
that the engine is as bulletproof as it's reputed to be.
Sorry cut their teeth is probably a poor expression to
Hi Alex,
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 10:35:14 -0700
From: Alex Rice [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: REV and multimedia
On Feb 9, 2004, at 10:24 AM, Stephen Quinn Barncard wrote:
Why this big negative about using Apple technologies? Quicktime works
well, and is free.
Quicktime is not
On Feb 9, 2004, at 11:06 AM, Rob Cozens wrote:
1. If you have reliability concerns, check with the MetaCard community
2. If you cannot become comfortable with message passing, you will
always be uncomfortable with any flavor of X-Talk.
Sounds like good advice
Thanks,
--
Alex Rice | Mindlube
Rob Cozens wrote:
And, by the way, reliability is not an issue from my perspective.
How long has the underlying MetaCard engine been on the market?
Rev's VM has been field-tested for more than 13 years.
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World Media Corporation
I sense you feel threatened by this thread because SDB and libIPC
are geared towards a more business like, maybe mission-critical
applications?
Thank you, Alex, for the excuse for a little PR.
1. SDB libIPC are free and open source
2. My concern is that they do the job for my applications, as
It's the same Lorin Rivers. He's no longer with REALbasic, obviously.
-Jerry
On Feb 9, 2004, at 1:13 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Alex Rice wrote:
On Feb 4, 2004, at 2:33 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
I like your comments on ways to improve the RunRev Web site and would
encourage you to forward them
Simple syntax/support question I would like to put a array into the element of
another array then access it. How would this be done?
put myArray into otherArray[ARRAY_KEY]
If so can t be accessed via
put otherArray[ARRAY_KEY][0] into myVariable?
K
On Feb 9, 2004, at 12:19 PM, Ken Norris wrote:
What's the alternative for scripting movies in Rev?
I think AVI is the other movie format that Rev supports, aside from
Quicktime. And animated GIF of course.
How about PNG animations (MNG)? http://www.libpng.org/pub/mng/
--
Alex Rice | Mindlube
On Feb 9, 2004, at 11:49 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been looking at the Runtime Revolution XML API it seems similar
to expat and several others I have used. However, I have failed to
locate any examples or tutorials are there any? If so where might I
find them?
In the Revolution
On Feb 9, 2004, at 1:18 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simple syntax/support question I would like to put a array into the
element of another array then access it. How would this be done?
put myArray into otherArray[ARRAY_KEY]
If so can t be accessed via
put otherArray[ARRAY_KEY][0] into
Does the access Array[ key1, key2 ] expand all elements of the array to have the same
number of cells or is this dynamic? I gues the qestion is is the array actually
implemented as a list?
K
--- On Mon 02/09, Trevor DeVore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Trevor DeVore [mailto: [EMAIL
On Feb 4, 2004, at 2:33 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
I like your comments on ways to improve the RunRev Web site and would
encourage you to forward them to Lorin Rivers at [EMAIL PROTECTED] as
I'm sure that refining Web site is an ongoing interest.
Lorin Rivers was VP of Marketing for REAL Software
On Feb 9, 2004, at 1:36 PM, Kevin wrote:
Does the access Array[ key1, key2 ] expand all elements of the array
to have the same number of cells or is this dynamic? I gues the
qestion is is the array actually implemented as a list?
I believe it is dynamic.
--
Trevor DeVore
Blue Mango Multimedia
--- Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My problem is that a custom property would be a
global type setting. I am attempting to create a
structure that can be passed from message to message
(a type of secession information). I require a
parameters array to be a member of a secession
array
On Feb 9, 2004, at 1:43 PM, Kevin wrote:
My problem is that a custom property would be a global type setting.
I am attempting to create a structure that can be passed from message
to message (a type of secession information). I require a
parameters array to be a member of a secession array
Ken Norris asked:
Rob,
In the product I'm working on with a client right now, we keep track of
birthdates. And the way we manage it is by setting the centuryCutoff to
one less than the current year (so right now it's 03). This means that
as long as someone is 99 years old or less, we're OK. It's
Thanks for the suggestion I will try several and see how they work out.
Kevin
--- On Mon 02/09, Trevor DeVore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Trevor DeVore [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 14:09:44 -0700
Subject: Re: Setting a element of a array equal
Alex,
My first mission critical app was written in SuperCard! It was a
Jumbotron display controller for the NBA called JIVES and it
controlled the big screen TV's for NBA teams. As many advertisers
use the Jumbotron, $$$ were at stake if it didn't work properly.
In over 5 years of use, to my
1 - 100 of 154 matches
Mail list logo
