On 26/10/10 3:47 PM, Pierre Sahores psaho...@free.fr wrote:
The way successfully used by the french Credit Agricole bank to make it's
fortune in using a slipknot credit policy to make its cattle's breeders
customers as dependent as possible from the bank. Apple will probably be
successful too
Hi folks,
I've blogged with my take on the Mac App store here:
http://www.runrev.com/company/runrev-blog/
Kind regards,
Kevin
Kevin Miller ~ ke...@runrev.com ~ http://www.runrev.com/
LiveCode - Realize fast, compile-free coding
___
use-revolution
Helpful synthese post, Kevin
Thanks,
Kind regards from southern Europ
Pierre
Le 26 oct. 2010 à 14:14, Kevin Miller a écrit :
Hi folks,
I've blogged with my take on the Mac App store here:
http://www.runrev.com/company/runrev-blog/
Kind regards,
Kevin
Kevin Miller ~
Here here!
Bob
On Oct 23, 2010, at 2:46 AM, Kay C Lan wrote:
Ah, been extremely busy of late and have a brief moment to visit the List to
discover nothing has changed, the old OS wars continues lightly disguised as
Steve is Satan discussion.
On 10/26/2010 06:56 PM, Bob Sneidar wrote:
Here here!
Bob
On Oct 23, 2010, at 2:46 AM, Kay C Lan wrote:
Ah, been extremely busy of late and have a brief moment to visit the List to
discover nothing has changed, the old OS wars continues lightly disguised as
Steve is Satan discussion.
On Oct 26, 2010, at 8:13 PM, Richmond wrote:
where does that leave Kevin Miller, You and Me
Don't know about you or Kevin. I'm thinking Russian Riveria at Jumala, then
Riga to S.Pb by train - Moscow - trans-Sierian RR. Yurts horses.
Off the grid and onto the tracks.
Ciao ciao!
sims
Richmond asked:
This of course leads to the inevitable question: if all computer people
eventually grow
horns where does that leave Kevin Miller, You and Me
Imps.
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World
LiveCode training and consulting: http://www.fourthworld.com
Webzine for LiveCode
Le 26 oct. 2010 à 20:13, Richmond a écrit :
On 10/26/2010 06:56 PM, Bob Sneidar wrote:
Here here!
Bob
On Oct 23, 2010, at 2:46 AM, Kay C Lan wrote:
Ah, been extremely busy of late and have a brief moment to visit the List to
discover nothing has changed, the old OS wars continues
Thanks Chipp. This thread has got so long that I couldn't find the post.
Sent from my iPad
On 25/10/2010, at 12:16 PM, Chipp Walters ch...@chipp.com wrote:
That someone is probably me. Here's my research. Both of these reputable
websites claim iPad apps sell for only about a buck more than
This analogy would hold true, if WalMart charged 30% of the profit margin of
everything sold in it's store, required a registration process before you could
even sell anything through them, but had such awesome security that all but
eliminated shoplifting and employee theft. In an environment
Hi Chipp, Bob,
http://gizmodo.com/5670812/big-brother-apple-and-the-death-of-the-prog
ram?skyline=trues=i
One of the more interesting comments is so appropriately true:
The argument that the app store doesn't bar outside
installations is bogus. It's like making the free market
Hi Sarah - very interesting perspective on the App Store. I was
particularly struck by one point.
On 25/10/2010 01:36, Sarah Reichelt wrote:
The other iOS phenomenon I would expect to see on the Mac, is greater
numbers of small, cheap, single-use apps. LiveCode is ideally suited
to this
This famous study on the impact WalMart has had on small town businesses
certainly debunks your notion both can thrive-- your comments regarding 30%
and other non sequiturs notwithstanding. You may wish to '*take the time to
examine*' it.
Le 26 oct. 2010 à 01:33, Lynn Fredricks a écrit :
The devil suggests Richard's installer
warning, new APIs only available store partners, and interactively modifying
requirements and restrictions whenever there's a new vertical market Apple
can profitably exploit (after proven by third
On 10/21/10 11:34 AM, Scott Rossi wrote:
Recently, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Is there anyone here with apps in the current iOS App Store who can
answer that?
As far as I can tell, no, they only offer tools/Web pages that display
statistical data of your sales.
How would it be possible for a
Lynn,
An issue which may be interesting, especially considering Apple's recent foray
into the Mac AppStore.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1323362/Apple-court-claims-teen-models-steamy-pictures-used-consent.html?ITO=1490
It appears Apple is being sued because of an iPhone app
Is there anyone here with apps in the current iOS App Store who can
answer that?
As far as I can tell, no, they only offer tools/Web pages that display
statistical data of your sales.
How would it be possible for a developer to know if someone who calls is
actually eligible for technical
Recently, I wrote:
I am quite a novice in the whole iApp arena, but barring any methods of
cracking I haven't heard about yet, apps are more or less tied to a device
-- you cannot arbitrarily move apps from one device to another, and you
cannot distribute apps outside the app store (aside
That someone is probably me. Here's my research. Both of these reputable
websites claim iPad apps sell for only about a buck more than iPhone apps.
Not the best of news for developers who make a living selling apps.
http://www.tuaw.com/2010/05/04/average-ipad-app-price-is-1-more-than-iphone-apps/
Ah, been extremely busy of late and have a brief moment to visit the List to
discover nothing has changed, the old OS wars continues lightly disguised as
Steve is Satan discussion.
I'm a little surprised we are still alive after the previous apocalyptic
prophesies made about the previous
To most people, this has never had anything to do with OS choice or with
Apple's stock price. It has to do with corporate conduct. It has to do
with the following:-
1) Do you want a society in which your access to applications and thus
increasingly to media is in the control of a few
Kay C Lan wrote:
I believe Steve's last 'will spell the end of Apple' decision was made about
30 April when Apple stock was around $261.09.
Apple's stock price third-party developer revenue.
As a shareholder, I think moving 30% of the Mac world's software revenue
into their own pocket is
On 10/23/2010 05:40 PM, Peter Alcibiades wrote:
To most people, this has never had anything to do with OS choice or with
Apple's stock price. It has to do with corporate conduct. It has to do
with the following:-
1) Do you want a society in which your access to applications and thus
A few times in the past I've bought these discounted bundles, where you get
perhaps a dozen applications for less than the price of the most expensive of
them. It's generally a good deal, especially if there's just one of them that
you were already thinking about buying at full price. Those
On 10/23/2010 07:19 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Kay C Lan wrote:
I believe Steve's last 'will spell the end of Apple' decision was
made about
30 April when Apple stock was around $261.09.
Apple's stock price third-party developer revenue.
As a shareholder, I think moving 30% of the Mac
I believe Steve's last 'will spell the end of Apple'
decision was made
about 30 April when Apple stock was around $261.09.
Apple's stock price third-party developer revenue.
As a shareholder, I think moving 30% of the Mac world's
software revenue into their own pocket is one of the
Kay,
I get it you're a big Apple fan. Good for you. I'm curious, do you
make a living writing and selling Mac software, or just investing in
Apple stock and watching it rise? Perhaps it might help looking at
things from a developer's point of view. Do you think it fair Apple
exchanges a 70%
One more thing. This isn't about OS wars. At least not from the perspective
I believe you may be talking about.
While I certainly don't agree with Steve on many issues, and one may infer
he may be Satan, he's a much smarter Satan than anyone else-- by far.
Just look at how weak the competition
On 10/24/2010 12:14 AM, Chipp Walters wrote:
One more thing. This isn't about OS wars. At least not from the perspective
I believe you may be talking about.
While I certainly don't agree with Steve on many issues, and one may infer
he may be Satan, he's a much smarter Satan than anyone else--
release the new KIM- a social network phone. It sells-- what-- 500
units it's first month? Can anyone seriously even think Apple could
eFF that up as bad? Heck, Apple can rebrand a steaming pile of you
know what and sell more than 500 units in a month.
Umm . . . really; I thought
Exactly. Sharepoint, .NET, SQLServer and other enterprise offerings are all
fine products, offering fine value for corporate America and are
well-supported.
IMO, MS stubbed their toe on WindowsME and Vista. The others were actually
pretty good. In fact, I really like Win7. The same version of
But anything they've done in Smartphones or other 'consumer
like' products like set top boxes (remember WebTV?), they
haven't done as well. The single exception in XBox360-- and
to this day I still don't understand how that one succeeded.
Xbox / Xbox 360 have been much easier to develop
The thought occurs to me that Web Apps are looking far more attractive.
sims
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
Yes, Richard's post is spot on. They have a track record, and this is how it
will start.
Peter
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/OT-Mac-App-Store-tp3004425p3006723.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
It will certainly become the most agnostic way to provide win-win next step
solutions to agnostic customers ...
Best,
Pierre
Le 22 oct. 2010 à 08:53, Jim Sims a écrit :
The thought occurs to me that Web Apps are looking far more attractive.
sims
On 10/22/2010 12:58 PM, Pierre Sahores wrote:
It will certainly become the most agnostic way to provide win-win next step
solutions to agnostic customers ...
Best,
Pierre
Le 22 oct. 2010 à 08:53, Jim Sims a écrit :
The thought occurs to me that Web Apps are looking far more attractive.
I'm currently working on a project and now thinking of using the old CGI rev
engine, not the plugin.
You can do a lot with the CGI engine - even more if you throw a connecting
standalone into the mix.
I was going to use a different setup but all seems clearer now.
sims
Le 22 oct. 2010 à 00:06, Lynn Fredricks a écrit :
A very interesting blog post about the Oracle v.s. Google
lawsuit (hint: it revolves around Java ownership and its
impact on android)
http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2010/08/14/how-oracle-might-kill
Le 22 oct. 2010 à 01:10, Chipp Walters a écrit :
Nice article, Lynn.
One thing it made me think of, is the incredible role the Internet has played
in software business development models. Previous to the Internet, the
software Kingmakers consisted primarily of the MacWorlds, MacUsers,
Sems me that this will stay the way to go as long as the password protected
stack's library support will not be added to the LiveCode cgi-based
application's server engine :-/
Would be great to get this feature added to the server engine as soon as
possible. A timeline info would greatly help
Yep. Thanks François
Pierre
Le 21 oct. 2010 à 23:15, François Chaplais a écrit :
A very interesting blog post about the Oracle v.s. Google lawsuit (hint: it
revolves around Java ownership and its impact on android)
Scott,
Congratulations on making to the new and noteworthy pane on the AppStore!!!
Just a few reviews and there you are. I can not imagine any other way to get
that kind of exposure that quickly. And to think this could happen for desktop
apps still seems a good thing to me. It levels the
Nice article, Lynn.
Thanks Chipp!
Heck, I first purchased TechSmith's SnagIt years ago, then
Camtasia soon after it launched. I now get an email every so
often with an upgrade discount offer I can't resist. They
receive 100% of the revenue, all for the cost of a single
email. This
Hi Lynn,
Saw an interesting post over at Gizmodo today.
http://gizmodo.com/5670812/big-brother-apple-and-the-death-of-the-program?skyline=trues=i
One of the more interesting comments is so appropriately true:
The argument that the app store doesn't bar outside installations is bogus.
It's
I think this article says it really well.
http://www.macobserver.com/tmo/article/
what_the_pundits_are_getting_wrong_about_the_new_macbook_air/
The MacBook Air is indeed Apple’s answer to the netbook. (One of
them, anyway — more on that later.) But the answer they’ve given is
“you’re doing
Bill,
That article is at mac observer-- so I'm thinking it could be a bit biased?
But, you are correct on a couple points. Netbooks are typically up to 1/8
the cost of the new MacBooks, and they have more USB and other external
ports.
Even so, my original point was you really can't believe
Chipp Walters wrote:
Jeez, how long before you have to JAILBREAK your Mac in order to put
your
own programs on it? I believe it's just around the corner..haven't been
wrong yet.
We all have to decide, its both a personal thing and a society thing. The
personal thing
is do we
From a posting on my company blog. Some points made with help and ideas from
this list. Thanks to you all.
---
Apple really is a remarkable company. Without a doubt, they provide flagship
innovation and thought leadership for the rest of the industry and the world
(Google, are
On 10/21/2010 10:27 AM, Peter Alcibiades wrote:
Chipp Walters wrote:
Jeez, how long before you have to JAILBREAK your Mac in order to put
your
own programs on it? I believe it's just around the corner..haven't been
wrong yet.
We all have to decide, its both a personal thing and a
Richmond wrote:
On 10/21/2010 10:27 AM, Peter Alcibiades wrote:
So the problem society has with Apple is not whether it will close down OSX,
I think Chipp is right, it will just as soon as it thinks it can.
I think they will end up shooting themselves in the bottom if they do this;
sooner or
Is is possible with iOS apps to require registration? I
would hate to
think that Apple should have my customer information but not be
allowed to know who my customers are, or not.
How does that work with iOS?
It's hard to imagine they could be so Draconian.
We are just finalizing
On 10/21/2010 05:39 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Richmond wrote:
On 10/21/2010 10:27 AM, Peter Alcibiades wrote:
So the problem society has with Apple is not whether it will close
down OSX,
I think Chipp is right, it will just as soon as it thinks it can.
I think they will end up shooting
On 10/21/2010 07:16 PM, Lynn Fredricks wrote:
Is is possible with iOS apps to require registration? I
would hate to
think that Apple should have my customer information but not be
allowed to know who my customers are, or not.
How does that work with iOS?
It's hard to imagine they could be so
Developers chime in on the implications of the Mac App Store:
Paul Kafasis, CEO of Rogue Amoeba, a developer of Mac audio
software, expressed some reservations about the terms.
Thirty percent isn't particularly reasonable, but it's not
unexpected either, he said in an e-mail. For
Lynn Fredricks wrote:
I think there is a simple question to ask -
Do I get to own or have access to the registration data for users of my
product?
Is there anyone here with apps in the current iOS App Store who can
answer that?
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World
LiveCode training and
On Oct 21, 2010, at 7:36 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Ambrosia Software president Andrew Welch voiced similar concerns.
Ambrosia is certainly interested in the idea of a centralized
Mac application store,
With VersionTracker gone, folded into download.com, download.com is abysmal as
far
Recently, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Do I get to own or have access to the registration data for users of my
product?
Is there anyone here with apps in the current iOS App Store who can
answer that?
As far as I can tell, no, they only offer tools/Web pages that display
statistical data of your
Maybe I have missed something, but is anyone saying that this will be the ONLY
WAY to get apps for Mac? How are they going to pull that off?? They would have
to abolish all I/O ports for drives, usb devices and cd/dvd drives. Is this
really where we think Apple is going to go?
I rather see
On Oct 21, 2010, at 12:18 PM, Richmond wrote:
On 10/21/2010 05:39 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Richmond wrote:
On 10/21/2010 10:27 AM, Peter Alcibiades wrote:
So the problem society has with Apple is not whether it will
close down OSX,
I think Chipp is right, it will just as soon as it
On 10/21/2010 08:51 PM, Jim Sims wrote:
On Oct 21, 2010, at 7:36 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Ambrosia Software president Andrew Welch voiced similar concerns.
Ambrosia is certainly interested in the idea of a centralized
Mac application store,
With VersionTracker gone, folded into
Wait just a daggum minute. I thought that Apple was building advertising into
the app model. So how are advertisers going to get the information? Are we
thinking that ads in the iDevices will not be able to link to a website? How
about a splash screen on your app asking users to register with
The thing about the Ambrosia apps is that they all need to patch the system in
order to work. It ought to still be possible to make the apps work in a way
that on first launch they then do the patch, and maybe require a restart. But
in general I thing the app store would be geared towards apps
On 10/21/2010 09:00 PM, Peter Brigham MD wrote:
On Oct 21, 2010, at 12:18 PM, Richmond wrote:
On 10/21/2010 05:39 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Richmond wrote:
On 10/21/2010 10:27 AM, Peter Alcibiades wrote:
So the problem society has with Apple is not whether it will close
down OSX,
I think
On Oct 21, 2010, at 8:04 PM, Richmond wrote:
market it your way
Sure, that's real easy to do. f]pfff.
Good luck in that - getting lots of people to see your product is not easy.
At least when VersionTracker and MacUpdate were around you had a couple of
central places where users would
Andre Garzia an...@... writes:
Folks,
check out: http://www.apple.com/mac/app-store/
http://www.apple.com/mac/app-store/Will our LiveCode apps be featured
there? So far we do not know since the thing was announced 10 minutes ago,
but one can only hope!
Andre
I agree with other
On 10/21/2010 09:15 PM, Jim Sims wrote:
On Oct 21, 2010, at 8:04 PM, Richmond wrote:
market it your way
Sure, that's real easy to do. f]pfff.
Good luck in that - getting lots of people to see your product is not easy.
At least when VersionTracker and MacUpdate
MacUpdate is still
Scott Rossi wrote:
Recently, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Do I get to own or have access to the registration data for users of my
product?
Is there anyone here with apps in the current iOS App Store who can
answer that?
As far as I can tell, no, they only offer tools/Web pages that display
Recently, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Is there anyone here with apps in the current iOS App Store who can
answer that?
As far as I can tell, no, they only offer tools/Web pages that display
statistical data of your sales.
How would it be possible for a developer to know if someone who calls is
I read somewhere that Java apps would NOT be allowed. Not sure that bodes well
for Rev.
On Oct 21, 2010, at 1:09 PM, Colin Holgate co...@verizon.net wrote:
I think that LiveCode standalones ought to come under that ok.
___
use-revolution mailing
On Oct 21, 2010, at 2:44 PM, Chipp Walters wrote:
I read somewhere that Java apps would NOT be allowed. Not sure that bodes
well for Rev.
Rev is in Java?
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to
On Oct 21, 2010, at 11:23 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Scott Rossi wrote:
Recently, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Do I get to own or have access to the registration data for users of my
product?
Is there anyone here with apps in the current iOS App Store who can
answer that?
As far as I can
Bob Sneidar wrote:
Maybe I have missed something, but is anyone saying that this will
be the ONLY WAY to get apps for Mac?
Not currently. In fact, Mr. Jobs went out of his way to note that it
won't be the only way to get apps.
But once traction gets hold and the marketing machine ramps
I think Java apps are not self-contained and require a separate runtime on
the machine.
On 21 October 2010 11:44, Chipp Walters ch...@altuit.com wrote:
I read somewhere that Java apps would NOT be allowed. Not sure that bodes
well for Rev.
On Oct 21, 2010, at 1:09 PM, Colin Holgate
I read somewhere that Java apps would NOT be allowed. Not sure that bodes well
for rev.
I think that might be because Java for Mac is deprecated now. As far as I read,
Apple will no longer deliver the VM with Mac OsX (Desktop edition) but only
with OsX Server.
Not really; there was an update to Java for mac OS 10.6 that was released today
or yesterday
the link to the french page is here:
http://support.apple.com/kb/DL972?viewlocale=fr_FR
Not that I am a java expert, I have never used it to my knowledge. But, well, I
do the updating...
Best,
Forgive me, but this view of the future seems apocalyptic. I never read any of
this in the book of Revelation. (WHOOPS! Reference to religion!!!) heh heh j/k
You might be right, but it all hinges on whether or not I presently agree with
you.
Quote from the book of Me
Bob
On Oct 21, 2010, at
Hi Francois:
From the releasenotes to said update:
Java Deprecation
As of the release of Java for Mac OS X 10.6 Update 3, the version of Java
that is ported by Apple, and that ships with Mac OS X, is deprecated.
This means that the Apple-produced runtime will not be maintained at the
Maybe I have missed something, but is anyone saying that this
will be the ONLY WAY to get apps for Mac? How are they going
to pull that off?? They would have to abolish all I/O ports
for drives, usb devices and cd/dvd drives. Is this really
where we think Apple is going to go?
I
Apocalyptic? Not sure that's the right word, unless one's world revolves around
Apple and what they will do.
Consider it was mere months ago when Steve told us all, Netbooks aren't better
than anything, they're just cheap laptops and yesterday he announces Apple's
first netbook.
Also from a
As far as I can tell, no, they only offer tools/Web pages
that display
statistical data of your sales.
How would it be possible for a developer to know if someone
who calls is actually eligible for technical support?
Most software developers I work with have this to think about, plus
Your analogy would work only if Apple had announced that if you bought another
netbook other than an Apple netbook, it would void your iPad warranty. Hmmm...
seems a little overstated, don't you think? Apple is of course, looking out for
their own interests. Shafting the vast majority of app
This means that the Apple-produced runtime will not be
maintained at the same level, and may be removed from future
versions of Mac OS X. The Java runtime shipping in Mac OS X
10.6 Snow Leopard, and Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard, will continue
to be supported and maintained through the standard
For your interest, the TUAW blog post some early reactions from developers to
the coming of the Mac App store:
http://www.tuaw.com/2010/10/21/developer-reactions-to-the-mac-app-store/
Much shorter, and authored by a pioneer of iPhone jailbreaking (that is, before
there was an SDK and an App
A very interesting blog post about the Oracle v.s. Google lawsuit (hint: it
revolves around Java ownership and its impact on android)
http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2010/08/14/how-oracle-might-kill-googles-android-and-software-patents-all-at-once/
A word of warning: the author is an Apple fanboy
Is the the future of what our customers will see at our software sites?
http://livecodejournal.com/blog.irv?pid=1287696062.654893
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World
LiveCode training and consulting: http://www.fourthworld.com
Webzine for LiveCode developers: http://www.LiveCodeJournal.com
I am going to create my own software store and will lock steve out of it!
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 7:27 PM, Richard Gaskin
ambassa...@fourthworld.comwrote:
Is the the future of what our customers will see at our software sites?
http://livecodejournal.com/blog.irv?pid=1287696062.654893
--
Is the the future of what our customers will see at our
software sites?
http://livecodejournal.com/blog.irv?pid=1287696062.654893
Hilarious, Richard :-)
But you forgot one thing.
...not containing viruses or porn.
Best regards,
Lynn Fredricks
President
Proactive International, LLC
-
Oh heck, no one is gonna put up with that!
Bob
On Oct 21, 2010, at 2:50 PM, Lynn Fredricks wrote:
Is the the future of what our customers will see at our
software sites?
http://livecodejournal.com/blog.irv?pid=1287696062.654893
Hilarious, Richard :-)
But you forgot one thing.
Oh heck, no one is gonna put up with that!
The lack of porn? ;-)
Best regards,
Lynn Fredricks
President
Proactive International, LLC
- Because it is about who you know.(tm)
http://www.proactive-intl.com
___
use-revolution mailing list
It is the Year Of Penguins in the Neo-Chinese calendar, the year we'll set
our computers free from the bad quality of windows and the ungrokkable mood
swings of Steve Jobs of Sith... now, let me install ubuntu again after
buying my iphone 4...
Jokes aside, I believe they would not be so drastic
A very interesting blog post about the Oracle v.s. Google
lawsuit (hint: it revolves around Java ownership and its
impact on android)
http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2010/08/14/how-oracle-might-kill
-googles-android-and-software-patents-all-at-once/
A word of warning: the author is an Apple
Bob Sneidar wrote:
Is the the future of what our customers will see at our
software sites?
http://livecodejournal.com/blog.irv?pid=1287696062.654893
Oh heck, no one is gonna put up with that!
Hard to say.
After all, it's just looking out for the user, providing as much
security and
Not to carry on this post forever, but the model of the present iTunes app
store is small apps that do one thing well that anyone (if approved) can use
for free, or else pay a fee for commercial use. Enterprise app developers are
simply not going to go with the model that Apple is presenting,
Nice article, Lynn.
One thing it made me think of, is the incredible role the Internet has played
in software business development models. Previous to the Internet, the software
Kingmakers consisted primarily of the MacWorlds, MacUsers, etc. and companies
with deep enough pockets to advertise
Le 21 oct. 2010 à 23:58, Andre Garzia a écrit :
It is the Year Of Penguins in the Neo-Chinese calendar, the year we'll set
our computers free from the bad quality of windows and the ungrokkable mood
swings of Steve Jobs of Sith... now, let me install ubuntu again after
buying my iphone 4...
Nothing to add :-/
Best,
Pierre
Le 21 oct. 2010 à 23:27, Richard Gaskin a écrit :
Is the the future of what our customers will see at our software sites?
http://livecodejournal.com/blog.irv?pid=1287696062.654893
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World
LiveCode training and consulting:
For myself, I'm not sure enough details are available to really know whether
this is a good thing or not. I would agree that first impression seems kind
of questionable. Apple controlling everything seems undesirable.
On the other hand, my little iPad game is currently being featured under the
check out: http://www.apple.com/mac/app-store/
Given how awful software is in the channel here in the USA, I think this is
a good thing for Mac developers. It will be interesting to see what sort of
restrictions or requirements there will be. A 30% margin to retail is about
right, provided there
This is very interesting and seems to be a huge opportunity for RR/LC
developers. It appears that regular executables will work on the Apple Mac
Store.
Tom McGrath III
Lazy River Software
http://lazyriver.on-rev.com
3mcgr...@comcast.net
I Can Speak - Communication for the rest of us...
Recently, Andre Garzia wrote:
check out: http://www.apple.com/mac/app-store/
http://www.apple.com/mac/app-store/Will our LiveCode apps be featured
there? So far we do not know since the thing was announced 10 minutes ago,
but one can only hope!
I read sometime in November...
Regards,
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
