Kay C Lan wrote:
Have you tried NeoOffice, based on Open Office but without the need to
install X11.
http://www.neooffice.org/neojava/en/index.php
---
Hi Kay, [Is that correct? You put your initials HTH at the end of your post.]
Recently, Nicolas Cueto wrote:
An application I've made works with 1000's of images (and sounds). Up
to now, I've used:
set the filename of [image object] to [file path]
However, the copyright holder of the images advises me that, should I
wish to share/sell my application, all the
Hello all,
I got SQLite to run in my XP standalone, but I don't understand why - but I
would like to for the next time :-) perhaps someone likes to correct my
approach:
- In Standalone App Settings I selected: Script Library: Database and
Database Support: SQLite
- I don't use
On Tue Jun 5, 2007 Klaus Major klaus at major-k.de wrote:
Hi friends,
I just discoverd strange things here on my PC:
Rev 2.8.1, WIN XP Home SP2.
In the msg:
put the long date - Tuesday, June 5, 2007
which is correct.
put the long system date - Mittwoch, 5. Juni 2007
which tells me it is
This preference doesn't seem to get applied, here. I've had it set
since the feature appeared in the ope-beta, and now in 2.8.1 gm-1
Studio, but all stacks get saved as 2.7, anyway.
It's bugzilla'd as bug 4695 pending.
Mac PB G4, OS 10.4.9
Mark
On 5 Jun 2007, at 18:59, J. Landman Gay
Hi Wilhelm,
On Tue Jun 5, 2007 Klaus Major klaus at major-k.de wrote:
Hi friends,
I just discoverd strange things here on my PC:
Rev 2.8.1, WIN XP Home SP2.
In the msg:
put the long date - Tuesday, June 5, 2007
which is correct.
put the long system date - Mittwoch, 5. Juni 2007
which tells me
Hi,
I tried this but it doesn't work, RunRev doesn't return an error. I
then used the external module that I wrote to get around the 2 GB
File Size Limit and that works *if* I open it with permissions set to
fsRdDenyPerm.
All the Best
Dave
On 30 May 2007, at 19:46, J. Landman Gay
Hi all,
...
Rev 2.8.1, WIN XP Home SP2.
In the msg:
put the long date - Tuesday, June 5, 2007
which is correct.
put the long system date - Mittwoch, 5. Juni 2007
which tells me it is wednesday (Mittwoch), NOT correct
Verified here.
This is an engine bug introduced with version 2.8.1, meaning
From: Peter T. Evensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Microsoft seems to be doing very well without open-sourcing its
development tools.
Indeed and while I'm 100% resistent to the trend for calling for open source
(not talking about people here on this list, but has it ever struck anyone
that when you
On 05/06/07, Richard Gaskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are these young minds concerned about cost, or do they need to modify
the C++ source?
Cost makes little difference to the students I know - if they need a piece
of software in their studies they know how to get it :) Access to the
source
I'm trying to center text in a field within a graphic (circle). The
text can be any font and any size.
I've been experimenting with code to center text within the field and
then set the loc of the circle to the loc of the field. I have yet to
find a method that perfectly centers text of
On 05/06/07, Lynn Fredricks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adobe owns all of the best selling commercial tools for
producing/supporting content for the Flex platform.
And how did they get there - not by selling software but giving away an easy
to install and useful piece of software?
By open
On 06/06/07, Scott Kane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Peter T. Evensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Microsoft seems to be doing very well without open-sourcing its
development tools.
Google seems to be doing better with a business strategy based around open
source software.
On 05/06/07, Randy Will
I see only three reasons for anything to go open source:
1) To attract more users - For example, Revolution Enterprise costs about
600 USD which in turn costs about 1,030 of my Brazilian Reals, the minimum
wage is 404 BRL, students such as me earns less than that per month. For
example, my
From: David Bovill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Google seems to be doing better with a business strategy based around open
source software.
Eh? That is not backed up by installed base and respective profits of the
two companies. MS has the lead in both.
I've heard for years that open source is
From: Andre Garzia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Also if we have a better way to create externals snip
I agree with this. The method to create externals in C++ is a total PITA.
That certainly should be improved and IMHO to the point where a standard dll
(etc) can be referenced without out the hoop
I can't figure out why the following doesn't work:
put (base64encode(URL file:img/000.jpg)) into URL file:img/000.if5
...
put (base64decode(URL file:img/000.if5)) into URL
file:img/000new.jpg
The files 000.if5 and 000new.jpg are created,
and 000.jpg and 000new.jpg are the same size,
but
Hi Nicolas,
Images are binaries: use 'binfile' instead of 'file'.
Le 6 juin 07 à 14:13, Nicolas Cueto a écrit :
I can't figure out why the following doesn't work:
put (base64encode(URL file:img/000.jpg)) into URL file:img/000.if5
...
put (base64decode(URL file:img/000.if5)) into URL
It's 17th October, 2007. Bob goes into his studio and turns on his
Ubuntu computer. As soon as Ubuntu is up and running, a little yellow
icon appears in the top right-hand corner of his screen. He clicks on
it, and Ubuntu tell him that there are some software updates for him to
download. He
The issue with this is that easier to use is a very subjective area.
Generally, in the tech sector, easier to use actually means easier to use
for someone who has been entrenched in the MS Windows world for the last 10
years. This is how MS gets all of their Cost of Ownership studies to work
Hello.
Another option would be to zip up your folder full of images, set it
as a custom property, and at runtime decompress it to a temporary
folder (specialFolderPath will help here), access your images, and
then delete the folder when you're done. As an extra precaution, you
should
Klaus Major wrote:
...
Rev 2.8.1, WIN XP Home SP2.
In the msg:
put the long date - Tuesday, June 5, 2007
which is correct.
put the long system date - Mittwoch, 5. Juni 2007
which tells me it is wednesday (Mittwoch), NOT correct
Verified here.
This is an engine bug introduced with version
Hello Bob,
RevBrowser works with WebKit on the mac and IE engine on windows. It
needs an embedable engine to work, on linux it could use Gecko.
Right now Opera doesn't ship an embedable engine that I know of. You
have opera running on all kinds of machines such as Game Boy Advance
and PCs but
Hi Richard,
Klaus Major wrote:
...
Rev 2.8.1, WIN XP Home SP2.
In the msg:
put the long date - Tuesday, June 5, 2007
which is correct.
put the long system date - Mittwoch, 5. Juni 2007
which tells me it is wednesday (Mittwoch), NOT correct
Verified here.
This is an engine bug introduced with
Yes I confirm here in France...
Rev says we are Thursday 6 :-(
In French...
Le 6 juin 07 à 16:18, Klaus Major a écrit :
Looks like this affects all non english systems.
Mark S. reported this bug first (#5035) with a dutch system.
Best regards from Paris,
Eric Chatonet.
I've heard for years that open source is going to overcome closed
source. I've listened to various people espousing it, heard examples
of where this is said to be taking place - yet it isn't. Open
Source is no more logical than Open Supermarkets where food is
given away. Neither work in what
Bless you, Jacque!
I don't think there is such a property, but you can read the binary
file to see the format. If it starts with REVO then it is the new
format. But for what you are doing, I don't think you'll have to
resort to this.
Thanks to you it was simple for me to create a menuItem
Randy Will wrote:
What all this comes down to is that ease of use is in the eye
of the beholder.
In many areas I would have to agree, but this need not be the case.
There was a time when usability was more the result of research findings
than marketing slogans.
While it's true than even
Adobe owns all of the best selling commercial tools for
producing/supporting content for the Flex platform.
And how did they get there - not by selling software but
giving away an easy to install and useful piece of software?
They got there by the acquisition of Macromedia :-)
Open Source is not how software is written, it's the philosophy
behind it: If what you're given doesn't work for you, you can change
it (yourself, someone else, contracted, free or whatever). It does
not mean that whatever changes are made are forced upon you, as for
that same reason, you
Shari wrote:
I wouldn't want an Open Source Revolution. Where nobody is
ultimately responsible for the bugs they create.
It is hard to beat the incentive of having your daily bread provided by
product revenue. It keeps the food chain simple and direct, and
provides perhaps the ultimate
On 6 Jun 2007, at 15:53, Lynn Fredricks wrote:
NDAs are all required when you get that close to the bone of a
company. But
you don't think its obvious that actual business size/structure and
strength
within its market space have a direct impact on its strategy?
That's where I'd prefer
From: Luis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There is great misconception in the commercial world regarding Open
Source, principally due to the heavy coating of FUD.
And there's absolutely, positively no FUD in the Open Souce community.?
;-)
Scott
___
From: Shari [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Think of the battle that authors of shareware wage against the very
perception of shareware being the equivalent of freeware in the minds of
many. How do you convince someone to buy it, when everybody is telling
your consumers that it's supposed to be free?
A lot of coders I know are moving to the Open Source world for the
simple fact that they can fix it. One case: Seeing RunRev lacking
certain 'facilities' (3D was high on his list, and yes, I am aware
of the plugin from igame3D) he couldn't believe that a modern
'language' didn't have it
There's a little of everyone in each of us. Human nature.
Cheers,
Luis.
On 6 Jun 2007, at 16:18, Scott Kane wrote:
From: Luis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There is great misconception in the commercial world regarding
Open Source, principally due to the heavy coating of FUD.
And there's
On 6 Jun 2007, at 16:32, Shari wrote:
A lot of coders I know are moving to the Open Source world for the
simple fact that they can fix it. One case: Seeing RunRev lacking
certain 'facilities' (3D was high on his list, and yes, I am aware
of the plugin from igame3D) he couldn't believe
Isn't Open Source about the same as creating freeware? Lots of
people enjoy the benefits, one or few people do all the work,
without ever getting paid for it.
Open-source products mustn't necessarily be free. And even if the
software is available to use for free, in many instances, the
Hi Mark,
I agree that the program is launching but I don't know why it's not running. It
runs fine when I double click it in windows and even when I launch it from the
command prompt manually (StartRuncmdexe path).
There must be some other hidden variable that I don't know about, like a
I see many threads on the list about open source but no one is talking
what this move would bring to RunRev...
I don't want to talk about the philosophy of the thing, I like sharing
stuff, everyone here knows that, I just want to make this thread
productive and not some eternal thread about
From: Luis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There's a little of everyone in each of us. Human nature.
Well I can't argue with that. :-)
Scott
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and
From: Andre Garzia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So again, except for the fact that there might be a tsunami that sinks
Scotland and RunRev with it, why do we need open source? We have
engineers and developers working full time in the product. They are paying
their bills and we're paying ours.
Well...
Quick tip:
For some, this might be preferable.
put quote into q
put HTML into h1
put HEAD into h2
put TITLEfsn/TITLE into h3
put /HEAD into h4
put BODY BGCOLOR=q#FFqFONT
FACE=qArialq into h5
put cr !-- d src =qClip Here.movq width =
q480q height=q270q scale
=qtofitq
Hello Friends,
I just saw that about 3500 passwords for Dreamhost company FTP
accounts were compromissed. I know some folks here have accounts there
so this is a note to them to check and maybe switch to a new password
for there may be hackers coming upon their accounts.
andre
Rob Cozens wrote:
Go to preferences, Files and memory pane, and turn off the option
that automatically adds the .rev extension. Also turn on the option
in the same pane that preserves the stack file type when saving a
legacy stack.
Thanks.
I guess this is broken, as per a recent list
Where did you see this? I have a DH account and obviously I'm
concerned about any potential compromise of my data.
On 6/6/07, Andre Garzia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Friends,
I just saw that about 3500 passwords for Dreamhost company FTP
accounts were compromissed. I know some folks here
On Jun 6, 2007, at 7:31 PM, Brent Anderson wrote:
Where did you see this? I have a DH account and obviously I'm
concerned about any potential compromise of my data.
http://daringfireball.net/
http://www.extrapepperoni.com/2007/06/06/dreamhost-screwed-the-pooch/
Quote from the web site
Jim Sims wrote:
On Jun 6, 2007, at 7:31 PM, Brent Anderson wrote:
Where did you see this? I have a DH account and obviously I'm
concerned about any potential compromise of my data.
http://daringfireball.net/
http://www.extrapepperoni.com/2007/06/06/dreamhost-screwed-the-pooch/
Quote from
Not forgetting that any time an object/embed tag appears in the HTML
you'll get activex warnings in IE, :-(
Ian
On 6 Jun 2007, at 18:04, Jim Ault wrote:
Quick tip:
For some, this might be preferable.
___
use-revolution mailing list
I have revved up an older thumbs stack since we started the
discussion about creation and modification dates of images and have
added a slides page to the stack where the images can be displayed
full-screen either step-by-step or as a slide show.
I did a little research and Revolution 2.6.1 will run on Mac OS X
10.0.4, but the download from RunRev is in the new form of DMG that is
not openable on Mac OS X 10.0.
I just tried converting the DMG and even opening it with MacDrive (on
Windows) and burning it to a CD and nothing is working.
What I see as an optimal model for RR isn't far at all from what we have now.
I believe that the engine should stay closed as the core team seems pretty well
able to handle that. I think the plugin structure and SDK needs to be
developed into more of a FOSS community (by this, I mean that Rev
The really terrible part of this is that the common interfaces that we know and
love aren't all that usable. There are substantially better (or should I say
well founded and researched) methods of interfacing, but they require a
learning curve due to insimilarity with what we know already
Andre Garzia wrote:
Hello Bob,
RevBrowser works with WebKit on the mac and IE engine on windows. It
needs an embedable engine to work, on linux it could use Gecko.
Right now Opera doesn't ship an embedable engine that I know of. You
have opera running on all kinds of machines such as Game
Hi List:
Stupid Question...
Is it possible to resize the handler list pane in the script editor?
Thanks Regards,
Scott Rossi
Creative Director
Tactile Media, Multimedia Design
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please
On Jun 6, 2007, at 3:43 AM, Trevor DeVore wrote:
I'm trying to center text in a field within a graphic (circle). The
text can be any font and any size.
Update - I haven't been able to find a reliable means of calculating
the center of text using any field properties so I resorted to
Trevor DeVore wrote:
On Jun 6, 2007, at 3:43 AM, Trevor DeVore wrote:
I'm trying to center text in a field within a graphic (circle). The
text can be any font and any size.
Update - I haven't been able to find a reliable means of calculating the
center of text using any field properties so
On Jun 6, 2007, at 1:21 PM, Scott Rossi wrote:
Hi List:
Stupid Question...
Is it possible to resize the handler list pane in the script editor?
Doesn't work here. But it's needed Sounds like an enhancement
request.
Devin
Devin Asay
Humanities Technology and Research Support Center
Bob Warren wrote:
Report #5121 http://quality.runrev.com/qacenter/show_bug.cgi?id=5121
Attachment #794
http://quality.runrev.com/qacenter/attachment.cgi?id=794action=edit
I've included the whole log (not very long since it's a new computer).
Thanks for doing that, Bob. An update on the guy
On 06/06/07, Randy Will [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I see as an optimal model for RR isn't far at all from what we have
now. I believe that the engine should stay closed as the core team seems
pretty well able to handle that. I think the plugin structure and SDK needs
to be developed into
On 6/6/07 12:21 PM, Scott Rossi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stupid Question...
Is it possible to resize the handler list pane in the script editor?
Short answer is 'yes'. Long answer is what manner to get the solution.
One way is to do the following
This will affect all currently open editor
Wasn't HyperCard semi-open-source way back because of XCMDs and XFCN?... A
tool like CompilIt made it easier for non-C coders to develop an extension
for HC for their own purpose. I don't think Rev has that facility that same
way, but couldn't Rev become semi-open-source by providing a tool like
On Jun 6, 2007, at 1:07 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
Does this work? :
on mouseUp
set the width of fld 1 to the width of grc 1 -- the circle
get the textsize of fld 1
set the textheight of fld 1 to it + (it div 3)
set the height of fld 1 to the formattedheight of fld 1
set the margins
I read a copy of the entire letter (that was posted online, I didn't
get one). They informed those on the servers affected, but didn't
create a panic. I think they handled it professionally.
If you weren't notified by Dreamhost themselves, you may not have
cause for alarm. According to
An application I've made works with 1000's of images (and sounds). Up
to now, I've used:
set the filename of [image object] to [file path]
However, the copyright holder of the images advises me that, should I
wish to share/sell my application, all the images need to be embedded
into
On 6/6/07 12:21 PM, Scott Rossi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi List:
Stupid Question...
Is it possible to resize the handler list pane in the script editor?
Of course, one workaround is to use the handler menu instead of the handler
list.
Jim Ault
Las Vegas
Trevor DeVore wrote:
Unfortunately it won't work in all cases. Using a field with the text
set to 1 and the textfont set to webdings is a good test case. The
problem is that even though you may have the textsize set to 100, the
vertical space taken up by the character is only 70 pixels (on my
Jim Carwardine wrote:
Wasn't HyperCard semi-open-source way back because of XCMDs and XFCN?... A
tool like CompilIt made it easier for non-C coders to develop an extension
for HC for their own purpose. I don't think Rev has that facility that same
way, but couldn't Rev become semi-open-source
On Jun 6, 2007, at 4:01 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
Version 2:
on mouseUp
set the width of fld 1 to the width of grc 1
get the textsize of fld 1
if it 20 then add 5 to it
set the textheight of fld 1 to it
set the height of fld 1 to it
set the loc of fld 1 to the loc of grc 1
end
Trevor DeVore wrote:
On Jun 6, 2007, at 4:01 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
Version 2:
on mouseUp
set the width of fld 1 to the width of grc 1
get the textsize of fld 1
if it 20 then add 5 to it
set the textheight of fld 1 to it
set the height of fld 1 to it
set the loc of fld 1 to
If you had a Home stack in Rev like there was in HyperCard, what would
you use it for?
Keep in mind that Rev is a different beast than HC, so let your
imagination run wild: What would you expect to see in a Rev Home stack?
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World Media Corporation
David Bovill wrote:
On 06/06/07, Randy Will randyw at uwm.edu wrote:
What I see as an optimal model for RR isn't far at all from what we have
now. I believe that the engine should stay closed as the core team seems
pretty well able to handle that. I think the plugin structure and SDK needs
some quick demo of the features:
1) couple casual games such as the ones Malte builds :D
2) couple network related desktop apps, that are better than web
browsers based apps.
3) quick PIM just so that people know it's easy.
4) some video testimonial by us! :D where the user could browse
Would be nice to have a list of Rev installed components, where, and what
they are used for. Rev is so different, why not give new users a picture
(and a tour) of the Rev neighborhood.
Little descriptions about the included plugins, how do you get them to work,
put them away, make your own, add
Joe Lewis Wilkins wrote:
I realize it would take a lot of initial work, but you guys seem up for
it: why not just use a lookup table with the exact values you need for
each font condition listed?
Geek rule #26: It isn't cool unless you can build an algorithm to do it. ;)
--
Jacqueline
Derek Bump wrote:
I did a little research and Revolution 2.6.1 will run on Mac OS X
10.0.4, but the download from RunRev is in the new form of DMG that is
not openable on Mac OS X 10.0.
I just tried converting the DMG and even opening it with MacDrive (on
Windows) and burning it to a CD and
Doug-
Wednesday, June 6, 2007, 8:44:10 AM, you wrote:
I agree that the program is launching but I don't know why it's
not running. It runs fine when I double click it in windows and even
when I launch it from the command prompt manually
(StartRuncmdexe path).
Well, it's a little hard to
The problem I have with runrev is not open source per se but that
with a paid model the incentive
is for the developer to release feature updates that sound good to
justify paying upgrade fees but
that for the most part are not nearly as valuable to a developer as
maintaining stable quality
I'm hoping someone has a clue to this:
I wrote an app for a client 3 years ago which has the ability to loop
through a list of .mov files, playing one after another in sequence. The
.mov files are audio-only, played via a player object, and require
QuickTime. In the Rev version I compiled it
I did, but that archive contains the Classic version of Revolution, not
the OS X version.
All in all it doesn't matter. It turns out that Revolution 2.6.1 is NOT
compatible with Mac OS X 10.0. My information that it was came from the
listing on VersionTracker.com, but it must have been an
Jacque,
Sounds as if the same sort of thing is occuring as when we call
multiple beeps and only hear one unless we build in a delay. Why not
try playing several from the message box with a built in delay when
one ends? I'm probably being a bit naive, but sometimes the simplest
things are
On 6/6/07, Luis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It does
not mean that whatever changes are made are forced upon you, as for
that same reason, you can change it.
GPL has given
us Linux, Firefox, etc.
OOPS, not so fast...have you seen the stir GPL 3 is causing? Turns out if
you plan on using GPL 3
Funny you should ask, Richard ;-)
I've been pondering this very thing for the ED-MEDIA attendees.
I'd personally like to see an intro to the product, that used commented
scripts that the user could 'take apart' too see how
strategically-employed basics worked. I'd like to see an updated version
Nothing. Absolutely Nothing. Any stack which launches everytime Rev does,
goes into the memory footprint and possibly adds frontscripts, backscripts
providing more opportunity to mess with the fragile IDE. Until the IDE runs
in it's own thread, I'd rather see some good demo stacks than a Home
On 6/6/07, Samuel M. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem I have with runrev is not open source per se but that
with a paid model the incentive
is for the developer to release feature updates that sound good to
justify paying upgrade fees but
that for the most part are not nearly as
On 6/6/07, J. Landman Gay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joe Lewis Wilkins wrote:
I realize it would take a lot of initial work, but you guys seem up for
it: why not just use a lookup table with the exact values you need for
each font condition listed?
Geek rule #26: It isn't cool unless you can
Chipp Walters wrote:
Nothing. Absolutely Nothing. Any stack which launches everytime Rev does,
goes into the memory footprint and possibly adds frontscripts, backscripts
providing more opportunity to mess with the fragile IDE.
...
There certainly must be a better way to create a strong first
If I have some code written in C that was used in HyperCard
and want to rewrite it for Revolution is the best program to
use for the job Apple XCode 2.
Where can I find the best examples of XCode 2 being used
in Revolution.
Are there versions of Codewarrior that work in OS X and will
do the
Samuel M. Smith wrote:
The problem I have with runrev is not open source per se but that
with a paid model the incentive is for the developer to release
feature updates that sound good to justify paying upgrade fees but
that for the most part are not nearly as valuable to a developer as
Depending upon the audience, RevOnline is too disorganized and
unintuitive. Plus, you have to hunt for it.
Judy
On Wed, 6 Jun 2007, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Chipp Walters wrote:
There certainly must be a better way to create a strong first time user
experience?
Would that include
You can turn RevOnline off...In fact it's the first thing I do when I launch
a new version of Rev. If you could turn the 'Home' stack off..would it still
be a Home stack?
On 6/6/07, Richard Gaskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would that include RevOnline?
Bob Warren wrote:
Report #5121 http://quality.runrev.com/qacenter/show_bug.cgi?id=5121
Attachment #794
http://quality.runrev.com/qacenter/attachment.cgi?id=794action=edit
I've included the whole log (not very long since it's a new computer).
Jacque wrote:
Thanks for doing that,
I agree completely with Chipp. Good readily and obviously available
template stacks much as Judy outlined them would be far more useful
and much less dangerous.
Joe Wilkins
On Jun 6, 2007, at 8:23 PM, Chipp Walters wrote:
Nothing. Absolutely Nothing. Any stack which launches everytime Rev
Chipp Walters wrote:
You can turn RevOnline off...In fact it's the first thing I do when I launch
a new version of Rev. If you could turn the 'Home' stack off..would it still
be a Home stack?
One could close the HC's Home stack, at least if some other stack was open.
As for any new Home
On 6/6/07, Richard Gaskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As for any new Home stack, at the moment this is just a thought
experiment so the definition of Home stack for the 21st century is in
flux, to be determined by whatever people here express. :)
Here's the backstory:
SNIP
OK, I understand
Joe Lewis Wilkins wrote:
On Jun 6, 2007, at 8:23 PM, Chipp Walters wrote:
Any stack which launches everytime Rev does, goes into the
memory footprint and possibly adds frontscripts, backscripts
providing more opportunity to mess with the fragile IDE.
I agree completely with Chipp. Good
I know it sounds like a contradiction, but yes I can get Revolution to launch
my program, but I does not run as if I double-cliced it in Windows. Let me
explain. It is a command line program, so when I double-click the exe, it
runs meaning that a black window pops up and a welcome message and
97 matches
Mail list logo
