-Original Message-
From: Wido den Hollander
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2024 9:16 AM
To: Alex Mattioli ; d...@cloudstack.apache.org;
users@cloudstack.apache.org; adietr...@ussignal.com
Subject: Re: Dynamic routing for routed mode IPv6 and IPv4 Isolated and VPC
networks
Op 22/05/2024 om
Wido den Hollander
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2024 8:22 PM
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; Alex Mattioli ;
users@cloudstack.apache.org; adietr...@ussignal.com
Subject: Re: Dynamic routing for routed mode IPv6 and IPv4 Isolated and VPC
networks
Op 20/05/2024 om 14:45 schreef Alex M
If you are 100% FC/NVME then OCFS2 is probably the best (or least bad) option.
I personally always tried to stick to NFS for KVM, it just works.
Reliability wise, I personally consider CEPH to be more reliable (and
supportable) than OCFS2.
Regards
Alex
From: Kristian Liivak
Sent: Monday, May
utube.com/channel/UCaFBGFfXmHziWGTFqjGzaWw>
IMPORTANT: The contents of this email are confidential. Information is intended
for the named recipient(s) only. If you have received this email by mistake,
please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to anyone
or make copies ther
ication handled at the network configuration, or another more
specific level.
Thanks,
Alex
From: Alex Mattioli
Date: Wednesday, May 15, 2024 at 10:15 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org ,
d...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: Dynamic routing for routed mode IPv6 and IPv4 Isolated and VPC
networ
Wido den Hollander
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2024 5:24 PM
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; Alex Mattioli ;
users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Dynamic routing for routed mode IPv6 and IPv4 Isolated and VPC
networks
My apologies! I totally missed this one. Commments inline.
Op 15/05/2024 om
sociated to a given account are associated to distinct
VRFs and may have different peering IP addresses.
I would like to see the peering IP addresses specific to the networks where
dynamic routing is enabled instead of specifying defaults at the zone level.
* Alex
[__tpx__]
From: Alex Mattioli
Da
y simple and basic dynamic BGP implementation working, after
>that's out there and in use then we definitely should discuss how to enhance
>the >feature with exactly what you pointed out.
Thanks,
Alex Dietrich
[__tpx__]
From: Alex Mattioli
Date: Wednesday, May 15, 2024 at 8:55
From: Alex Mattioli
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2024 3:25 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org; d...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Dynamic routing for routed mode IPv6 and IPv4 Isolated and VPC networks
Hi all,
I'd like to brainstorm dynamic routing in ACS (yes, again... for the newcomers
You can set your upstream router with a static ARP entry for the public IP,
this way if your user changes the IP they'll simply lose their own
connectivity. Should be quite easy to automate.
-Original Message-
From: K B Shiv Kumar
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2024 4:30 PM
To:
Hi all,
I'd like to brainstorm dynamic routing in ACS (yes, again... for the newcomers
to this mailing list - this has been discussed multiple times in the past 10+
years)
ACS 4.17 has introduced routed mode for IPv6 in Isolated networks and VPCs, we
are currently working on extending that to
+1
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2024 1:50 PM
To: dev
Cc: users
Subject: [VOTE] next version 20 instead of 4.20
LS,
This is a vote on dev@c.a.o with cc to users@c.a.o. If you want to be counted
please reply to dev@.
As discussed in [1] we
Hi Rahul,
The project has been tentatively named "OpenSDN", here's the new mailing list:
https://groups.io/g/OpenSDN. There should be a larger update there soon.
Also, here are the meeting notes for the initial discussion around the project:
Hi Tobias,
I'm not sure if it fits your use case (and Wido already gave you all the
necessary advice on Shared networks and IPv6), but I'd like to highlight that
there's support for IPv6 in Isolated Networks and VPCs as well.
Cheers
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Tobias Rehn
There’s a feature to pass a vlan range to an interface, but unfortunately
that’s VMWare. There’s no way that I know of to do that in KVM at the moment,
but it would be a great features.
From: Lewis Di Ciacca
Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2023 11:44 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject:
+1 to that
-Original Message-
From: Stephan Bienek
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2023 9:15 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: VM Firewalls In Between Subnets
Hi Bryan,
sure you can, for example using multiple L2 networks connected to your virtual
appliance.
L2 network
Hi Bryan,
Which type of network are you using?
From 4.19 it will be possible to change SourceNAT IP.
You can change the IP of each network and then decommission the "public" range.
To change the IP of the systemVMs you have to disable the zone, destroy the
current systemVMs, remove the
Adding to that, from ACS 4.19 volume snapshots can be copied to other zones
(SnapshotsCopy)
Regards,
Alex
-Original Message-
From: m...@swen.io
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2023 9:58 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: AW: Difference between VM Snapshot and Snapshot
One
I have, with VMWare.
The setup of the cards was done between VMWare and the NICs, CloudSstack didn't
really need to know anything about it.
With KVM you can maybe do the same
Cheers
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Tiang
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2023 3:12 PM
To: Vivek
this firewall manually.
Will this work?
Regards,
Bryan
On 16 Nov 2023 at 1:11 PM +0800, Alex Mattioli ,
wrote:
> I've deployed PaloAlto firewalls as VNFs in CloudStack, but didn't use the
> integration, it seems to have been abandoned as it didn't work with the
> version of PAN-OS I
I've deployed PaloAlto firewalls as VNFs in CloudStack, but didn't use the
integration, it seems to have been abandoned as it didn't work with the version
of PAN-OS I was using. That was back with ACS 4.11, didn't try with later
versions.
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Tiang
Does this PR fix the issues with VRRP?
-Original Message-
From: gabriel.fernan...@scclouds.com.br
Sent: Wednesday, November 8, 2023 3:32 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: Redundant router - Isolated Network
Hello Cristian,
This feature was removed from the UI due to
I doesn’t necessarily get throttled, the added latency will definitely impact
the maximum bandwidth achievable per stream, especially if you are using TCP.
In this case a bandwidth delay calculator can help you find the maximum
theoretical bandwidth for a given latency:
> all snapshots make a local copy to the management server disk before sending
> it to the secondary storage locations, yes.
What exactly do you mean by that?
From: Granwille Strauss
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2023 1:21 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Nikolaos Tsinganos
Subject: Re: Async
Not at the moment.
What's your use case there?
-Original Message-
From: m...@swen.io
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2023 5:31 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: dedicated secondary storage
Hi all,
is it possible to create a secondary storage dedicated to a domain? Thx for a
That's correct, the networks need to be created in CloudStack first.
-Original Message-
From: Jafar Aghabalayev
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2023 12:53 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: VMWare dvSwitch - import port groups to Cloudstack
Hello Rohit,
Thank you for prompt
Hi Remi,
There isn't much, but I'll be giving a presentation on how Tungsten works with
ACS this Thursday (4th) for the CS European User Group. Sign-up and watch, then
if you still have any questions let me know and I can give you more guidance.
Cheers
Alex
-Original Message-
From:
>> CloudStack is considered to be more lightweight and easier to deploy and
>> manage, while OpenStack is more flexible and >>customizable.
I fully agree with the first part of the sentence, but the second isn't really
true, CloudStack is as customizable and flexible as OpenStack. It is less
Adding my 2cents. Inline with your questions.
-Original Message-
From: Axel Baudot
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2023 1:14 AM
To: users
Subject: Arguing for Cloudstack for a HPC oriented datacenter
Hello dear CloudStack users,
As a team sitting at a crossroad to chose a solution to
Interesting, I wonder why it doesn't work on VMWare, where you can actually set
a limit in MHZ
-Original Message-
From: Nux
Sent: 22 March 2023 17:58
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Alex Mattioli
Subject: Re: Adding Tags to Service Offerings in use
The MHz has 2 uses that I
creating new compute offerings with the tags.
One more question, when creating new offerings it is possible to specify "CPU
in MHz)", what is the exact impact on the offering?
Best regards,
Christian
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Alex Mattioli [mailto:alex.matti...@sha
22 March 2023 08:23
To: 'users@cloudstack.apache.org'
Subject: AW: Adding Tags to Service Offerings in use
Hi Alex,
thanks for the feedback, I will try it.
Do you see any problem when doing the same with compute offerings?
Best regards,
Christian
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Sent: 21 March 2023 19:26
To: 'users@cloudstack.apache.org'
Subject: AW: Adding Tags to Service Offerings in use
Hi Alex,
I will add tags to disk offerings to put disks on separate primary storages.
Thanks,
Christian
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Alex Mattioli [mailto:alex.matti
Indeed you can only do that in the DB afaik.
As any other manual DB manipulation, you need to be extremely careful.
Which tags are you planning on adding and what for exactly? That will help
evaluate how dangerous (or not) it's likely to be.
Cheers
Alex
From: Christian Reichert
Sent: 21 March
Stephan's idea definitely works. That's one of the most popular use cases of
this feature.
-Original Message-
From: Stephan Bienek
Sent: 24 February 2023 11:39
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Multiple public networks per zone ?
Might the available functionality to
Welcome to the community Vishesh.
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Vishesh Jindal
Sent: 01 February 2023 16:45
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Hello
Hi All,
This is Vishesh. I have recently joined ShapeBlue. I am looking forward to
contributing to the cloudstack project and
+1 on that, and especially useful for Edge zones.
-Original Message-
From: Nux
Sent: 24 January 2023 14:43
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org; Apache CloudStack Marketing
Subject: Re: CloudStack and Tungsten Fabric Solution Brief
Thanks Ivet, this is
Amazing @Jamie Pell!! That's probably the most amazing location possible in
London.
-Original Message-
From: Ivet Petrova
Sent: 18 January 2023 08:33
To: Apache CloudStack Marketing
Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Official event location - CloudStack European Users
t; Yes, another physical network.
> > > > I tried to bridge eth0 and eth2 ( both are flat networks, not
> > > > VLANs),
> > but
> > > > got blocked by the telco provider in the datacenter, as eth2 is
> > > > a
> > > physical
> >
or example haproxy doing reverse proxy for
cloudstack ui
- management network ( RFC1918 ) is available only for certain peope via
conditional routing
- public network / wan ( IPv4 pool ) is directly connected to the internet
út 3. 1. 2023 v 14:17 odesílatel Alex Mattioli
napsal:
> Hi Luká
Hi Lukáš,
Definite possible.
You can just add a new "public" IP range to your zone and select the option
"Set Reservation" and then "SystemVM". You then need to destroy your SystemVMs,
they will be recreated with those IPs.
Cheers,
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Lukáš Mrtvý
Sent:
Hi Marty,
You can use a shared network setup with public IPs and configure the upstream
router as the gateway, then another shared network with the gateway on the
firewall and deploy your VMs in that network.
Regards,
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Marty Godsey
Sent: 29
+1 to what Marco said and adding one quite important feature.
* Associated Networks - Self-service Shared Networks and Private Gateways.
(4.17)
Cheers
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Marco Sinhoreli
Sent: 19 December 2022 11:59
To: market...@cloudstack.apache.org;
Which hypervisor is that?
-Original Message-
From: Rafael del Valle
Sent: 06 December 2022 11:38
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org; Rafael del Valle
Subject: Re: VM Volume Limit 1024 GB
Domain limits I don't use, so they are all set as "-1", not
From my experience I had a few issues with RVRs myself, some of those were:
1. They’d fail to elect a master and continuous flip over the connection
2. When going anywhere above 1gbps the Master would fail to send broadcasts
messages and the Backup VR would become master, ending up with 2
Hi,
CloudStack automatically auto scales your SSVMs as necessary, there are two
global settings that control that, namely:
secstorage.capacity.standby The minimal number of command execution
sessions that system is able to serve immediately(standby capacity)
secstorage.session.max The max
That's an intriguing idea.
What kind of capabilities do you see being extended this way?
-Original Message-
From: Ricardo Pertuz
Sent: 30 November 2022 14:33
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Cloud-init Injection on VRs
Hi ACS community,
It would be great when creating a
Hi Bryan,
* San Storages shall Mirror Each Other for full storage redundancy.
I’d highly recommend placing the mirror SAN in a separate rack.
* Additional harddrives to be added to the San Storages as when needed.
Do you plan for disk shelves in the same rack?
* Server Capacity
Hi Jay,
I'd love to hear more about how you implemented the GPU pass-through, and I
think it could be quite useful for the community as well.
Cheers
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Jayanth Reddy
Sent: 13 November 2022 10:43
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Emil Karlsson
Subject:
14:49
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org; Granwille Strauss
Cc: Alex Mattioli
Subject: Re: Multiple NFS Secondary Storage
Thanks Granwille for remember about this.
We try to explain this problem on this issue an year ago
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/5770
Can we reflote it?
Regards
your secondary storage
pools:
https://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-feature-deep-dive-secondary-storage-management/
and avoid the manual database changes.
Cheers
Alex
From: Granwille Strauss
Sent: 07 November 2022 14:39
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Alex Mattioli
Subject: Re: Multiple
) table
Cheers
Alex
From: Granwille Strauss
Sent: 07 November 2022 12:12
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Alex Mattioli
Subject: Re: Multiple NFS Secondary Storage
Hi Alex
Thank you for getting back to me. I had one NFS server and all snapshots was
correctly stored on it and I noticed
Hi,
What exactly do you mean by “All three NFS servers are different subnet
servers”?
ACS does indeed “load balance” through multiple secondary storages, but ideally
you’d add additional ones long before the existing ones are full.
If a certain volume already has snapshots in a given secondary
+1 on that Daan, definitely worth waiting a bit longer.
-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav
Sent: 01 November 2022 06:37
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org; dev
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] postpone 4.18 to the new year
+1 Daan, your proposal to postpone to early next year makes sense.
Hi Steve,
I'd assume you have "brbond1" set as the guest traffic label for that zone,
that being the case the other servers need to match that. ACS uses the traffic
labels to map the virtual networks to the physical nics/bonds.
Can you deploy VMs to the new nodes?
Regards,
Alex
or creating a custom Virtual Router template.
Thank you all for your help
Le mer. 21 sept. 2022, 22:18, Alex Mattioli a
écrit :
> You could potentially change the MAC Address in the NICs table in the
> database, but that would be possible only after the VR has been deployed.
> Hope it
You could potentially change the MAC Address in the NICs table in the database,
but that would be possible only after the VR has been deployed.
Hope it works for you.
If you need help with the command I can send you the MySQL statement, let me
know.
Cheers
Alex
-Original Message-
Hi Ricardo,
You set the tag, say "HDD", on the storage offering and on the primary storage
which you want to use for HDD, then do the same for all other storage types.
When creating a volume the end user will select the offering "HDD, SATA or
NVMe" and ACS will place the volume in a storage
+1 on all below, I think you'll be a great RM.
-Original Message-
From: Abhishek Kumar
Sent: 02 August 2022 14:38
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [PROPOSE] CloudStack 4.17.1.0 release and RM
Hi all,
I would like to propose and put myself
Sounds amazing @Ivet Petrova
-Original Message-
From: Daman Arora
Sent: 05 April 2022 16:51
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: users
Subject: Re: CloudStack Collaboration Conference 2022 - November 14-16
Sounds like a good idea to me.
Thanks,
Daman Arora.
On Tue., Apr. 5, 2022,
And bear in mind that this storage network will be used for your secondary
storage, it will have traffic when templates are copied to primary storage and
snapshots are copied to secondary storage. If you are already segregating your
primary storage traffic it is a good idea to then place this
Hi Evgeniy,
Physical networks consist of a mapping between a certain ACS type of networks
(guest, management, storage, public) and the physical NICS.
You can very well have just one physical network for all types of networks, and
many do that, but ideally you would segregate, let me give you a
Hi,
ACS indeed does not support migrating between regions.
If you are using VMWare you can unmanage the VMs from one region and ingest in
another. In the case of KVM and XEN you'll need to export the VM and register
it as a template in the new region, no way to do without downtime.
Regards
Alex
Hi Jamex,
Am glad the guide was of help and it works well for Linux. I'm really not sure
what could be going wrong with the Windows VM though, I suggest you try
installing windows directly on the physical host to see if the card drivers
work at all.
Cheers
Alex
-Original
Hi James,
If the OS can detect the card then it can be passed-through. There's a very
nice article on how to achieve that:
https://lab.piszki.pl/cloudstack-kvm-and-running-vm-with-vgpu/
Let me know if it works for you, am quite curious about it.
Regards
Alex
-Original Message-
Which is the same as the 25MB/s mentioned.
The ACS VF can easily pass 3gpbs of traffic, but you need to change the network
offering.
Regards
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Wei ZHOU
Sent: 27 September 2021 20:16
To: users
Subject: Re: Slow VirtualRouter/NAT (25MB/s)
Hi Nathan,
If
Hi Jonas,
A Region is one instance of the ACS database and a set of management servers,
inside a Region you have Zones.
There are many ways to carve that but one example would be:
Regions: Europe, North America, Asia.
Then say, inside the Europe region you can have the zones: London, Paris,
I second what he said, I've ran ACS zones with 60+ hypervisors and 2,000 VMs
from one single pair of storage servers delivering , all on NFS and no issues
at all.
Just be sure to select the right vendor and size it correctly.
-Original Message-
From: Ivan Kudryavtsev
Sent: 23
Hi all,
Do any of you (or anyone you know of) use Cloudstack to deploy bare metal? If
so, what's the use case?
Thanks,
Alex
Hi,
That would be bandwidth between which hosts? Also, what exactly would you
call normal and excessive bandwidth usage?
Regards
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Saurabh Rapatwar
Sent: 08 September 2021 16:46
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: d...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject:
router ip . In this case ,does not need any BGP router
> .
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Similar concept as IPv4 :
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> /48 subnet of IPv6 is equivalent to current /24
(GPU models are enterprise Nvidia based)
Regards.
From: Alex Mattioli
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2021 19:07
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org ;
d...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Cloudstack GPU
Hi all,
Anyone out there using GPUs with Cloudstack?
If so, with which
multiple GPUs you can assign them to one or more VMs).
>
> I found this old wiki:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/GPU+and+vGPU+su
> pport+for+CloudStack+Guest+VMs (GPU models are enterprise Nvidia
> based)
>
>
> Regards.
>
> _____
Hi all,
Anyone out there using GPUs with Cloudstack?
If so, with which hypervisor and GPU?
Thanks,
Alex
at 8:55 PM Alex Mattioli
wrote:
> Hi Wido,
> That's pretty much in line with our thoughts, thanks for the input. I
> believe we agree on the following points then:
>
> - FRR with BGP (no OSPF)
> - Route /48 (or/56) down to the VR
> - /64 per network
> - SLACC for IP
-
From: Wido den Hollander
Sent: 13 July 2021 15:08
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; Alex Mattioli
Cc: Wei Zhou ; Rohit Yadav ;
Gabriel Beims Bräscher
Subject: Re: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks
On 7/7/21 1:16 PM, Alex Mattioli wrote:
> Hi all,
> @Wei Zhou<mailto:wei.z...@sh
ossibly OSPF)
on the ACS VR.
We are looking for requirements, recommendations, ideas, rants, etc...etc...
Alex Mattioli
+1 on OpenVPN, and then a framework later on.
-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav
Sent: 10 June 2021 10:25
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSS] Moving to OpenVPN as the remote access VPN provider
All,
We've historically supported openswan
Yes, they definitely can.
Cheers,
Alex
-Original Message-
From: 小林 美佳子
Sent: 27 May 2021 13:36
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Can DvSwitch be used for management and storage networks for
CloudStack 4.14?
Hello.
I'm designing a physical network for CloudStack 4.14.
My
in the VDS I have in vCenter. Shouldn't the guest, public,
management, and storage port groups (physical networks) be added to the vCenter
VDS?
Also - I found out that in the Secondary Storage wizard window you don't
include the "/" in the path field.
Mike
-Original Message-----
Storage Fails
Alex,
Rather than me sending out emails to a mailing list, is there a KB or online
bucket of past emails that I can look through for issues similar to mine?
Thanks!
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Alex Mattioli
Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2021 10:53 AM
To: users
Hi Mike,
Is that with NFS?
Can you mount the datastore from all your hosts? (I believe you already stated
that, but just to be sure).
Got a screenshot of the primary storage part of the wizard?
Cheers,
Alex
From: Corey, Mike
Sent: 12 May 2021 16:35
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject:
Hi ,
What is your use case for using non-rfc1918 addresses inside a VPC? Given that
the VPC will NAT those IPs to one from the Zone's public range I can't really
see why'd you want to use public IPs there.
Regards
Alex
-Original Message-
From: 小林 美佳子
Sent: 12 May 2021 11:07
To:
As in, renaming the DC.
From: Alex Mattioli
Sent: 11 May 2021 17:34
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: Failed to add VMware DC...
Hi Mike,
I had the same issue a few times, try to place the custom attribute back and
set it to false.
If that still doesn't work, try renaming
Hi Mike,
I had the same issue a few times, try to place the custom attribute back and
set it to false.
If that still doesn't work, try renaming it and restarting vCenter.
Cheers,
Alex
From: Corey, Mike
Sent: 11 May 2021 17:08
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Failed to add VMware
p one or more physical networks. Each
network corresponds to a NIC on the hypervisor. Each physical network can carry
one or more types of traffic, with certain restrictions on how they may be
combined. Add or remove one or more traffic types onto each physical network."
From: Alex Mattioli
Sen
Hi Mike,
The trafficlabel is in the format "vSwtichName,VLAN,typeofswitch", the default
for ESX being " vSwitch0,,vmwaresvs"
In your case it would be something like "dvs_Storage,21,vmwaredvs" for your
storage traffic label (assuming you are using VLAN 21). In the old UI it was a
bit
vmk. (In my case I've used that in production for monitoring
and backups, but could be for vMotion as well).
Hope that helps,
Btw, what bandwidth do you have on those links?
Cheers,
Alex
From: Corey, Mike
Sent: 10 May 2021 22:15
To: Alex Mattioli
Subject: VMware VDS Specifics
Hi Alex,
I'm
are actually in ACCESS with specific VLAN, how can I add an IP
with a tagged VLAN on xenserver?
On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 10:29 AM Alex Mattioli
wrote:
> Hi Alessandro,
>
> Is the new iSCSI subnet present in the same L2 switching fabric? In
> that case you just need a VLAN interface o
Hi Alessandro,
Is the new iSCSI subnet present in the same L2 switching fabric? In that case
you just need a VLAN interface on the 10.0.0.x network. If it is in a separate
switching fabric then you can add a couple extra NICs to your host and connect
to that network.
Migration wise, as long
Hi Hean,
What type of network and hypervisor are you using? Also, which version of ACS?
Regards,
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Hean Seng
Sent: 30 April 2021 08:34
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: IPv6 Issue in Cloudstack
Hi
I setup the IPv6 in VM. Outbound form VM is
Hi Matt,
Adding from a more practical experience side of things (I've implemented a
rather large ACS deployed across 17 datacenters around the world, so had quite
a bit of experience with that)
Assuming it's VMWare I'd echo what Rohit said and say that you really should go
with dVS. I'd say
there. If you run into any issues
just let me know and I’d be glad to help.
Cheers,
Alex
From: Andrija Panic
Sent: 26 April 2021 22:55
To: users ; Alex Mattioli
Subject: Re: VMware VDS Updates on 4.15?
Hi Mike,
I'll ask my colleague @Alex Mattioli to comment - I believe both are achievable
As far as I know not, but sounds like a very interesting future feature to me.
Alex
alex.matti...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
3 London Bridge Street, 3rd floor, News Building, London SE1 9SGUK
@shapeblue
-Original Message-
From: anonymousjones666
Sent: 15 April 2021 17:09
he guestnetwork.
> > I have attached a screenshot of what we did but the second IP range
> > cannot be used when deploying an instance Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
> > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> > On Thursday, April 15, 2021 11:09 AM, Alex Mattioli
> > alex
Hi Mr 666.
Let me see if I got it right. You have two /28s with Public IPs and want your
VM to have one IP from each?
Cheers
Alex
alex.matti...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
3 London Bridge Street, 3rd floor, News Building, London SE1 9SGUK
@shapeblue
-Original Message-
is created (but editable and applied when the network is restarted with
clean-up).
I'll consult with my colleagues what's the best way forward and get back to you.
Cheers,
Alex
From: Rafael del Valle
Sent: 25 March 2021 09:06
To: Alex Mattioli
Cc: d...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: RE: RE: Virutal
for MTU tunning on VRs?
I would be to contribute and implement it.
Regards,
On Wed, 2021-03-24 09:39 AM, Alex Mattioli wrote:
>
Hi R,
>
> There's no ACS setting for the VR's MTU size.
> Unless you are running storage traffic s in that network then jumbo frames
> aren't of muc
Hi R,
There's no ACS setting for the VR's MTU size.
Unless you are running storage traffic s in that network then jumbo frames
aren't of much use. I've ran some tests at the request of some customers in my
previous job, and with some very busy VRs and the performance gains for an MTU
of 9000
Hi Felipe,
As far as I know baremetal in ACS hasn't been used much, the code should still
be functional but without much new.
If you can share your use can then we might be able to assist further.
Cheers,
Alexandre Mattioli
alex.matti...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
3 London Bridge
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
