On 2020-04-22 13:45, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Fedora 30
>
> How do I fix this?
>
> # dnf upgrade --refresh --disablerepo=brave*
> Fedora Modular 30 - x86_64 2.9 kB/s | 16 kB 00:05
> Fedora Modular 30 - x86_64 - Updates 32 kB/s | 14 kB 00:00
>
Hi All,
Fedora 30
How do I fix this?
# dnf upgrade --refresh --disablerepo=brave*
Fedora Modular 30 - x86_64 2.9 kB/s | 16 kB
00:05
Fedora Modular 30 - x86_64 - Updates 32 kB/s | 14 kB
00:00
Fedora 30 - x86_64 - Updates 34 kB/s | 15 kB
the message come when (using Libre Office) I press the button to print.
Probability /etc/cups/printers.conf need to be configured..
but inside this file I don't see nothing that concern with
"document-format".
The content of> /etc/cups/printers.conf is :
# Printer configuration file for CUPS
On 2020-04-21 21:38, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 2020-04-22 11:46, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Would it hurt anything to remove the old ones?
Hurt? No. Cause you an inconvenience at a later date? Maybe.
Example. Let's say you want to install some SW from an earlier release of
Fedora that was
On 2020-04-22 11:46, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> Would it hurt anything to remove the old ones?
Hurt? No. Cause you an inconvenience at a later date? Maybe.
Example. Let's say you want to install some SW from an earlier release of
Fedora that was dropped. So, you go back and find an
On 2020-04-21 20:19, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
ToddAndMargo via users writes:
Hi Ed,
Ooops. Forgot to reinstall the key. :'(
And now everything works right.
Thank you for sticking this through! You are awesome!
To answer your other questions: the GPG keys for older Fedora releases
are
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 05:21:47PM -0500, David wrote:
> It is not clear to a newbie what is a "ga."
>
> "Go Ahead" ??
>
> Gamma ?
>
> Guaranteed Addition ?
"General Availability" (ie, released to the public)
RC => "Release Candidate" - Something that could be the GA release, but
needs some
ToddAndMargo via users writes:
Hi Ed,
Ooops. Forgot to reinstall the key. :'(
And now everything works right.
Thank you for sticking this through! You are awesome!
To answer your other questions: the GPG keys for older Fedora releases are
harmless.
But I have believed, for quite
For you newbies,
GA
In the software release life cycle, general availability (GA) refers to the
marketing phase when all "practical" developmental activities pertaining to
the Linux distribution have been completed. At this point, the
distribution is allegedly or hopefully available for
On 2020-04-18 00:50, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 4/17/20 4:39 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 4/17/20 4:28 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
I have a scenario where I have a Fedora server at
one location and five Windows workstations, each
at a different location.
The customer wants to give the five
> On 22 Apr 2020, at 06:28, Johannes Kastl wrote:
>
> On 21.04.20 at 01:59 William Brown wrote:
>>> On 21 Apr 2020, at 06:08, Johannes Kastl wrote:
>
>>> *g*
>>
>> Sorry I don't understand this comment?
>
> I knew I should have used my usual smiley instead.
>
> Basically I wanted to show
> On 22 Apr 2020, at 07:38, Mark Reynolds wrote:
>
>
> On 4/20/20 10:29 PM, William Brown wrote:
>>
>>> On 21 Apr 2020, at 06:34, Johannes Kastl wrote:
>>>
>>> On 17.04.20 at 10:38 Johannes Kastl wrote:
Hi again,
I found several links on how to export from 389 to LDIF.
>>>
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 5:22 PM David wrote:
> It is not clear to a newbie what is a "ga."
>
> "Go Ahead" ??
>
> Gamma ?
>
> Guaranteed Addition ?
>
Generally Available? :)
Thanks,
Richard
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
It is not clear to a newbie what is a "ga."
"Go Ahead" ??
Gamma ?
Guaranteed Addition ?
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On 4/20/20 10:29 PM, William Brown wrote:
On 21 Apr 2020, at 06:34, Johannes Kastl wrote:
On 17.04.20 at 10:38 Johannes Kastl wrote:
Hi again,
I found several links on how to export from 389 to LDIF.
On a related note:
On 4/21/20 4:25 PM, Johannes Kastl wrote:
Hi Mark,
On 21.04.20 at 04:05 Mark Reynolds wrote:
The first place you should look is the official documentation, it covers the new
CLI and UI processes, including replication.
On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 14:27:18 -0500 Roger Heflin wrote:
> I would check the rating on your HDMI cable, the older ones aren't
> supposed to be able to support greater than 1080p rates, so if you
> cable is very old it may not support the speed.
>
> There is probably something written on the cable
On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 17:47:14 -0300 "George N. White III"
wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 at 16:30, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 11:49:59 -0700 stan via users <
> > users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 12:40:30 -0500
> > > Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> >
On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 at 16:30, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 11:49:59 -0700 stan via users <
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 12:40:30 -0500
> > Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 12:17:24 -0500 Ranjan Maitra
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >
On 21.04.20 at 01:59 William Brown wrote:
>> On 21 Apr 2020, at 06:08, Johannes Kastl wrote:
>> *g*
>
> Sorry I don't understand this comment?
I knew I should have used my usual smiley instead.
Basically I wanted to show that this indeed a valid reason for not using
pam-config...
Johannes
Hi Mark,
On 21.04.20 at 04:05 Mark Reynolds wrote:
> The first place you should look is the official documentation, it covers the
> new
> CLI and UI processes, including replication.
>
> https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_directory_server/11/
Thanks for the answer. Will
On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 11:49:59 -0700 stan via users
wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 12:40:30 -0500
> Ranjan Maitra wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 12:17:24 -0500 Ranjan Maitra
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I recently got myself a UHD monitor.
> > >
> > >
I would check the rating on your HDMI cable, the older ones aren't
supposed to be able to support greater than 1080p rates, so if you
cable is very old it may not support the speed.
There is probably something written on the cable ends and/or the side
of the cable itself. Mine says high speed on
On 4/21/20 1:23 AM, Angelo Moreschini wrote:
after I reinstalled cups service, my printer not works any more ; I get
this message:
"couldn't start the printer
please check your printer configuration"
Where do you see this message?
in the journalctl they are some rows that I think are
On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 12:40:30 -0500
Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 12:17:24 -0500 Ranjan Maitra
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I recently got myself a UHD monitor.
> >
> >
On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 12:17:24 -0500 Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recently got myself a UHD monitor.
>
> https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07JXCR263?tag=aboutcom02lifewire-20=ogi=1=1=4138562%7Cneef17e57867342f0bc4b3af20a9ba60801
>
> However, when I connect to my 3840x2160 resolution laptop and use
On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 11:23:44 +0300
Angelo Moreschini wrote:
> after I reinstalled cups service, my printer not works any more ; I
> get this message:
> "couldn't start the printer
> please check your printer configuration"
> Apr 21 10:26:42 pluto cupsd[1023]: REQUEST localhost - - "POST
>
Hi,
I recently got myself a UHD monitor.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07JXCR263?tag=aboutcom02lifewire-20=ogi=1=1=4138562%7Cneef17e57867342f0bc4b3af20a9ba60801
However, when I connect to my 3840x2160 resolution laptop and use xrandr
(through HDMI, supplied with the monitor) I do not even get an
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 12:23 PM bruce wrote:
>
> Hey Ed.
>
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> Regarding the security/monitoring issue.
>
> Here's my use case:
>
> I'm looking to have multiple servers.
> Servers would be running different apps for different purposes.
> All Servers running Fed
> -DB
Hey Ed.
Thanks for the reply.
Regarding the security/monitoring issue.
Here's my use case:
I'm looking to have multiple servers.
Servers would be running different apps for different purposes.
All Servers running Fed
-DB Server -mysql/mariadb
-Server running webapps/httpd
-Servers running
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 9:48 AM Tom Horsley wrote:
>
> I looked at the fedora-announce list archives and there was
> only about one message a month or so old.
>
The logistics[1], devel-announce[2], and test-announce[3], all get
announcements of Go/No-Go decision. I also publish a weekly post on
On 2020-04-21 21:33, bruce wrote:
> Not willing to step on toes. Is asking for opinions on tools to do
> system/security monitoring off topic? Been doing research, thought I'd ask
> here as well - if it's acceptable?
Not off topic at all.
Fedora supplies tools used in the area. So, all you
On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 21:28:36 +0800
Ed Greshko wrote:
> The following was sent to the announce list on Friday last.
I looked at the fedora-announce list archives and there was
only about one message a month or so old.
But I just found the fedora-test-announce list archives :-).
So now I know
Hey.
Not willing to step on toes. Is asking for opinions on tools to do
system/security monitoring off topic? Been doing research, thought I'd ask
here as well - if it's acceptable?
thanks
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On 2020-04-21 21:14, Tom Horsley wrote:
> I haven't been able to find anything that looks like an
> official delay announcement, just a schedule listing with
> the obscure info about today being the preferred target
> and the 28th being the current target. I can't tell what
> that means :-).
The
I haven't been able to find anything that looks like an
official delay announcement, just a schedule listing with
the obscure info about today being the preferred target
and the 28th being the current target. I can't tell what
that means :-).
___
users
cryptsetup reencrypt --hash sha512 /dev/sdx
This works but it will re-encrypt the entire device.
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 1:30 PM Sreyan Chakravarty
wrote:
> Is it possible to re-encrypt a partition with the
>
> cryptsetup reencrypt
>
> command, to use the SHA-512 hash ?
>
> Currently, my
On 2020-04-21 02:34, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 2020-04-21 17:25, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
You still don't have
c2d4e821-5e7252b8 Brave Software public key
a.k.a. gpg-pubkey-c2d4e821-5e7252b8
installed.
How did
sudo rpm --import
On Mon, 2020-04-20 at 19:55 -0400, Stephen Perkins wrote:
> This horse is dead. Beating it will add nothing to Fedora users
> lives. I buy on Swanson using FF and have NO problems.
+1
Entertaining though it is, little if any of this thread has to do with
Fedora.
poc
On 2020-04-21 17:25, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
>
>> You still don't have
>>
>> c2d4e821-5e7252b8 Brave Software public key
>> a.k.a. gpg-pubkey-c2d4e821-5e7252b8
>>
>> installed.
>>
>> How did
>>
>> sudo rpm --import
>> https://brave-browser-rpm-release.s3.brave.com/brave-core.asc
>>
>>
On 2020-04-21 02:15, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 2020-04-21 16:55, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 2020-04-21 01:33, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 2020-04-21 16:02, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 2020-04-20 23:13, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 2020-04-21 14:07, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Still getting
On 2020-04-21 16:55, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> On 2020-04-21 01:33, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 2020-04-21 16:02, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
>>> On 2020-04-20 23:13, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 2020-04-21 14:07, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> Still getting
>
> warning:
>
On 2020-04-21 01:33, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 2020-04-21 16:02, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 2020-04-20 23:13, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 2020-04-21 14:07, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Still getting
warning:
On 2020-04-21 16:02, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> On 2020-04-20 23:13, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 2020-04-21 14:07, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
>>> Still getting
>>>
>>> warning:
>>>
after I reinstalled cups service, my printer not works any more ; I get
this message:
"couldn't start the printer
please check your printer configuration"
in the journalctl they are some rows that I think are connected with this
problem:
--
Apr 21 10:25:04 pluto cupsd[1023]: REQUEST
On 2020-04-20 23:13, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 2020-04-21 14:07, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Still getting
warning:
/var/cache/dnf/brave-browser-rpm-release.s3.brave.com_x86_64_-d55d330619c02b48/packages/brave-browser-1.7.92-1.x86_64.rpm:
Header V4 RSA/SHA512 Signature, key ID 82d3dc6c: NOKEY
Is it possible to re-encrypt a partition with the
cryptsetup reencrypt
command, to use the SHA-512 hash ?
Currently, my partition uses SHA-256, so I want to reencrypt without losing
any data. I have heard that the cryptsetup reencrypt does online
re-encryption, but the man page is not clear
On 2020-04-21 14:07, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> Still getting
>
> warning:
> /var/cache/dnf/brave-browser-rpm-release.s3.brave.com_x86_64_-d55d330619c02b48/packages/brave-browser-1.7.92-1.x86_64.rpm:
> Header V4 RSA/SHA512 Signature, key ID 82d3dc6c: NOKEY
> Public key for
On 2020-04-20 18:29, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 2020-04-19 03:30, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 2020-04-18 11:10, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Hi All,
To get FC32 to upgrade on on eof my VM's, I have to add
--disablerepo=brave*
to the following:
#dnf --enablerepo=* update --refresh
49 matches
Mail list logo
