to whatever I want and when I use The Bat!, it too goes right through.
Any other ideas?
Restart spamd? If it works in test and not in production...
BTW, you DO know that The Bat! is a perfectly legit (and very nice) mail
program, don't you? Lots of spammers abuse the name, but there are
I see. The order is really directory order and not so much as file
order. All .cf files within each of the directories are read.
Not quite. The files are read from each directory in the order of the file
names, which is why many of the names start with numbers. Obviously
99anything.cf is
Hi forum,
recently i get a lot of spam emails with very low score mostly are text emails. How can i fine tune my SA in order to catch those emails?
here is an exmple:
Hi,
Not very good erecxction? You are welcome - http://pdahlmjr.com/l/
jockstrap or sporran woven out of, well possibly,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Pepe wrote:
decoder wrote:
Which OCR plugin are you using there? If it is the original
OcrPlugin, then you might try FuzzyOcr instead. The original
OcrPlugin was more proof-of-concept, and will cause you lots of
headaches with the current
Well even your message scored pretty high here. Were this mailing list
not whitelisted, it would have gone to /dev/null
Maybe you should turn on Network tests and configure Razor?
On Tuesday 22 August 2006 23:24, yossim wrote:
Spam detection software, running on the system pen.homeip.net,
Hello John,
Thanks for your quick response.
I am not sure that i understand your answer. Sorry i am not so experinece
with SA.
The score that i got for that specific example was:
score=0.395,required 6.2,
BAYES_20 -0.74, FORGED_RCVD_HELO 0.14,HTML_MESSAGE 1.00)
There are many calculation
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 00:48, yossim wrote:
Hello John,
Thanks for your quick response.
I am not sure that i understand your answer. Sorry i am not so experinece
with SA.
The score that i got for that specific example was:
score=0.395,required 6.2,
BAYES_20 -0.74, FORGED_RCVD_HELO
Daryl C. W. O'Shea writes:
John D. Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 22 Aug 2006, Matt Kettler wrote:
John D. Hardin wrote:
Coders (if any):
Can anybody point me at a code sample showing how to get details into
the report SUMMARY tag from within a plugin?
Like the [IP address etc.] in this:
John D. Hardin writes:
On Tue, 22 Aug 2006, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
I took a casual glance at the code, it seems to be related to the
test_log subroutine, which populates test_log_msgs, that later
gets added to the REPORT and SUMMARY.
I got the same impression, but
Hi there,
Recently we have switched over how our emails get sent. Emails now get sent
from our server at the office, they then get scanned and routed through the
ISP's mail server and then get forwarded on to the end recipients server.
My question is: Due to the configuration, if a customer
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 10:19, aurora wrote:
Basically, we now get alot of customers calling us saying that they have
not received our email and it's because it has been held on their spam
server with a score of 6, even though its a plain text email! We have only
been getting these issues
Duncan Hill wrote:
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 10:19, aurora wrote:
Basically, we now get alot of customers calling us saying that they have
not received our email and it's because it has been held on their spam
server with a score of 6, even though its a plain text email! We have
only
Hi,
aurora wrote:
Duncan Hill wrote:
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 10:19, aurora wrote:
Basically, we now get alot of customers calling us saying that they have
not received our email and it's because it has been held on their spam
server with a score of 6, even though its a plain text email!
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 10:37, aurora wrote:
ISP's SMTP server which then hits the customers SMTP/POP server. In most
cases, your SMTP server will just find a direct route to the destination
server and only the sending server and receiving server will be involved
without a server being in
Anthony Peacock wrote:
Hi,
aurora wrote:
Duncan Hill wrote:
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 10:19, aurora wrote:
Basically, we now get alot of customers calling us saying that they
have
not received our email and it's because it has been held on their spam
server with a score of 6,
Tell me something, is there a pluggin for outlook that would allow me to train spamassassin on the web server?Eg, messages come in, end up in my Junk Mail folder, can i somehow select them, and click a button with this 'addin' and have it find our web server and train spam assassin with the data
Sometimes i get this errors from spamd:
Aug 23 08:48:15 dmz spamd[24977]: syslog() failed: corrupted regexp
program at /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.7/i586-linux-thread-multi/S
ys/Syslog.pm line 320.
Aug 23 08:48:16 dmz spamd[24977]: razor2 check skipped: corrupted
regexp program at
Hi
I'm using spamassassin + qmail-scanner
There is a way to tell qmail-scanner or spamassasin to NOT delivery mail
if spamc failed?
This is beecause sometimes my spamd daemon goes down and all spam
messages are passed...
Any ideas?
Christopher Mills wrote:
Tell me something, is there a pluggin for outlook that would allow me to
train spamassassin on the web server?
Eg, messages come in, end up in my Junk Mail folder, can i somehow
select them, and click a button with this 'addin' and have it find our
web server and
I have just upgraded my Spamassassin on Debian Stable to 3.1.3
(backports) from 3.0.3 and I get this message in Exim's paniclog:
spam acl condition: cannot parse spamd output
That is not the case with every message. Does
My Exim4-acl's:
warn message = X-Spam-Score: $spam_score ($spam_bar)
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 02:28:38PM +0200, Johann Spies wrote:
I have just upgraded my Spamassassin on Debian Stable to 3.1.3
(backports) from 3.0.3 and I get this message in Exim's paniclog:
spam acl condition: cannot parse spamd output
At the same time the /var/log/exim4/paniclog reports
Christopher Mills wrote:
Tell me something, is there a pluggin for outlook that would allow me to
train spamassassin on the web server?
Eg, messages come in, end up in my Junk Mail folder, can i somehow
select them, and click a button with this 'addin' and have it find our
web server and train
Hmm Maybe if I post with a more obvious subject line
What is the notation for writing a whitelist_from or whitelist_from_rcvd
when the sender is ? (As in MAIL FROM: )
Thanks,
-Philip
Philip Prindeville wrote:
Well, I have the following issue. When I report abuse to [EMAIL
IMAP2MBOX
You take the mail from the junk folder ,
run imap2mbox, take that mbox file and use it to train SA
But Im not sure what you are
referring to as far as the web server
From: Christopher
Mills [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006
8:07 AM
To:
On Tue, 22 Aug 2006, Loren Wilton wrote:
BTW, you DO know that The Bat! is a perfectly legit (and very
nice) mail program, don't you? Lots of spammers abuse the name,
but there are any number of people that use it to send real mail.
I mention that since the score I saw you assigning was
Has anyone experienced SPF_* rules not actually being scored
?
In the debug I see that it comes back as result: none
shouldnt this come back as SPF_NEUTRAL ?
We are setting up SA with amavisd, and when running amavis
in debug mode
(amavisd u amavis g amavis debug-sa) I
can see
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006, Philip Prindeville wrote:
Hmm Maybe if I post with a more obvious subject line
What is the notation for writing a whitelist_from or
whitelist_from_rcvd when the sender is ? (As in MAIL FROM:
)
Are you sure you want to use that broad a brush? There is a *lot*
On 8/23/06, Michael Grey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone experienced SPF_* rules not actually being scored ?
In the debug I see that it comes back as 'result: none' – shouldn't this
come back as SPF_NEUTRAL ?
When the domain does not publish SPF records you get result: none.
Test
Since this is not a production system, we have had to do some MX magic on a
remote domain to push mail through this new system... that domain doesn't
have SPF enabled (curse you Network Solutions !)
So the big question is really this : Should NONE get an SPF score ?
Thanks
Mike
-Original
On 23-Aug-06, at 12:45 PM, Michael Grey wrote:
Since this is not a production system, we have had to do some MX
magic on a
remote domain to push mail through this new system... that domain
doesn't
have SPF enabled (curse you Network Solutions !)
So the big question is really this : Should
Sorry, I was too philosophical in my question... to rephrase;
In the standard SA config, should I expect to see an SPF_* rule hit returned
when the SPF return value is 'none' ?
Thanks
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Gino Cerullo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006, Gino Cerullo wrote:
So the big question is really this : Should NONE get an SPF score ?
That is a matter of internal policy on your part. If you want to
penalize domains for not having an SPF record you could give it a
negative score. On the other hand, if you wish to
On 23-Aug-06, at 1:09 PM, John D. Hardin wrote:
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006, Gino Cerullo wrote:
So the big question is really this : Should NONE get an SPF
score ?
That is a matter of internal policy on your part. If you want to
penalize domains for not having an SPF record you could give it a
On 23-Aug-06, at 1:01 PM, Michael Grey wrote:
Sorry, I was too philosophical in my question... to rephrase;
In the standard SA config, should I expect to see an SPF_* rule hit
returned
when the SPF return value is 'none' ?
This is from the latest 50_scores.cf
# SPF
# Note that the
Matt Yackley wrote/co-authored (not sure which), a plugin for Outlook
that moves the messages to a public folder (spam and ham).. Maybe he'll
share?
From there, a central server could attach to those public folders,
create RFC822 text files out of them, and then learn them via a simple
perl
What I do here, is that I tell my users to DRAG / MOVE any spam into a
public folder, then I run IMAP2MBOX once that is done I then train SA
using the mbox file--
Fairly simple , just make sure the users do NOT FORWARD the messages to the
public folder
-Original Message-
From:
Your timing is perfect. I just
implemented this yesterday!
The script you may be looking for is
imap-sa-learn.pl from: http://www.gagravarr.org/code/
The how-to is here: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/spamassassin-users/200406.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Users then drag (very
SLOW DOWN!! Thats sounds
like an awful lot when you can just let imap2mbox do it all.
Imap2mbox does everything for you , except
moving the messages to the folder
http://www.byteplant.com/support/nospamtoday/howtolearnexchange.html
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I am proud to be able to announce a new release of FuzzyOcr with lots
of new features and changes.
You can download it at http://users.own-hero.net/~decoder/fuzzyocr/
Before installing this plugin, make sure to read the INSTALL file.
If
Imap2mbox resides on a windows server and
only converts the imap format into an mbox format. Reading the links you
provided there is an executable and external batch files to run on a windows
machine. So that would/could be a solution if your environment is windows
only. We are running a
Hello all.I searched my archive of the list, and couldn't find a similar issue. This is probably something I've misconfigured, but here goes. Running SA 3.14 via the Mail::SpamAssassin Perl plugin from amavisd-new. Have been running into a problem where some dynamic RBL lists are firing just
Using spamd started from .procmailrc, it logs to syslog and ends up in
/var/log/mail.log, along with postfix's log and courier-imap's log.
How can I get some analysis of this?, eg positives per day, etc.
Have googled a bit, and looked in the archives, a lot of people talk
about their stats, not
Nick Rout wrote:
So I take it USER_IN_WHITELIST also checks Return-Path? I wonder where
Return-Path is being set? Is it likely to be set by the spammer? Or is
my system adding it in somewhere (probably in error).
Return-Path is usually added by the receiving system, and contains the
envelope
My setup is
FREEBSD 5.4 SA EXIM CLAMAV filters
all incoming mail, once SA CLAMAV clean
the mail it goes to exchange
The imap2mbox DOES NOT run on the exchange
server, I run from my pc as follows
D:\imap2mboximap2mbox.exe
--path=public folders/ --folder=1spam
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 14:49:19 -0700
Kelson wrote:
Nick Rout wrote:
So I take it USER_IN_WHITELIST also checks Return-Path? I wonder where
Return-Path is being set? Is it likely to be set by the spammer? Or is
my system adding it in somewhere (probably in error).
Return-Path is usually
Hi,
This is to notify you about another SARE channel with the most used
rules available as a single channel. If you're not the type to try
every single rule in SARE and manually select them, you can instead use
this single channel instead.
OpenProtect's Sa-update channel for SARE
Well
met,
Just activated
SpamAssassin on my website (by my web hosting provider) and wanted to do some
simple tests which I read from the Wiki site and FAQ. When it didn't run I
opened a ticket with my provider and he said he didn't support it and I needed
to find help else where. So here
As a quick guess, you probably need to fix your Trust Path:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/TrustPath
D.J. wrote:
Hello all.
I searched my archive of the list, and couldn't find a similar issue.
This is probably something I've misconfigured, but here goes. Running
SA 3.14 via the
From: Nick Rout [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using spamd started from .procmailrc, it logs to syslog and ends up in
/var/log/mail.log, along with postfix's log and courier-imap's log.
How can I get some analysis of this?, eg positives per day, etc.
Have googled a bit, and looked in the archives, a lot
Joseph, may I make a slight suggestion for you?
For the rewrite try something about the same size that makes eyeball
filtering ham out of the spam folder much easier:
rewrite_header subject * Rated SPAM: _SCORE(00) *
Then the header subject will start with something like this:
* Rated SPAM:
anyone know what this is/does?
http://cia.navi.cx/stats/project/FreeBSD/.message/32ba98d/xml
--j.
John D. Hardin wrote:
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006, Philip Prindeville wrote:
Hmm Maybe if I post with a more obvious subject line
What is the notation for writing a whitelist_from or
whitelist_from_rcvd when the sender is ? (As in MAIL FROM:
)
Are you sure you want to use that
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006, Philip Prindeville wrote:
John D. Hardin wrote:
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006, Philip Prindeville wrote:
What is the notation for writing a whitelist_from or
whitelist_from_rcvd when the sender is ? (As in MAIL FROM:
)
Are you sure you want to use that broad a brush?
I don't know if anyone other than me does this but thought I'd ask if anyone
else is having problems with them. I keep getting these bounces, but not on
all messages:
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following
Hi people, Have any of you used the SpamAss-Milter ?I am still having hell getting all our inbound mail into spamassassin. Mail going to local mailboxes gets scanned, but if they are being forwarded to external addresses (like
[EMAIL PROTECTED]) are not. This is frustrating the hell out of me
Hey list,
Sorry if this has been covered before. We recently upgraded to SA
3.14 - and I today ran a
spamassassin -D --lint
to check everything. I saw several lines like the following:
[31579] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has undefined
dependency 'PYZOR_CHECK'
So, does this
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 06:33:03PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry if this has been covered before. We recently upgraded to SA
3.14 - and I today ran a
it has. :)
[31579] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has undefined
dependency 'PYZOR_CHECK'
So, does this undefined
From: Christopher Mills [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi people,
Have any of you used the
SpamAss-Milterhttp://www.sendmail.com/partners/milter/milter.detail/#SpamAss-Milter?
I am still having hell getting all our inbound mail into spamassassin. Mail
going to local mailboxes gets scanned, but if they are
Hello,Since upgrading to 3.14, when I turn on bayes auto-learn with:bayes_auto_learn 1and I set the learn boundaries with:bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam -3.5bayes_auto_learn_threshold_spam 15.5I get unexpected auto-learning. Example: I just saw a spam come through that scored 9.9,
59 matches
Mail list logo
